about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,519 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the second variable is The number of secretaries in Massachusetts.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As technology advanced, secretaries realized they no longer needed to communicate via carrier pigeon and smoke signals, leading to a statewide plummet in the demand for shorthand expertise. It turns out, training in telegraphs and semaphore flags just wasn't cutting it in the modern office.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image where a group of students in futuristic attire, holding their Associates degrees in Communications technologies, confidently navigate a bustling office environment in Massachusetts. As they celebrate, the secretarial desks gradually fade away, representing the students' newfound ability to efficiently handle administrative tasks with their advanced expertise, symbolizing the changing landscape of office responsibilities. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Parallax art Futuristic a meme A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts, in the following situation: As more people pursued communication technology degrees, the demand for secretaries decreased since the graduates were now proficient in handling their own administrative tasks. It's like the saying goes, "Why hire a secretary when you can just slide into those DMs yourself?". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling office in Massachusetts, a group of students proudly receives their Associates degrees in Communications technologies. As they celebrate, the number of secretaries in the office gradually decreases, as the graduates efficiently handle their own administrative tasks with their newfound expertise. The once-busy secretarial desks now sit empty, as the graduates confidently manage their own communications and correspondence, embracing the changing landscape of office responsibilities.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling office in Massachusetts, a group of students proudly receives their Associates degrees in Communications technologies. As they celebrate, the number of secretaries in the office gradually decreases, as the graduates efficiently handle their own administrative tasks with their newfound expertise. The once-busy secretarial desks now sit empty, as the graduates confidently manage their own communications and correspondence, embracing the changing landscape of office responsibilities. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image where a group of students in futuristic attire, holding their Associates degrees in Communications technologies, confidently navigate a bustling office environment in Massachusetts. As they celebrate, the secretarial desks gradually fade away, representing the students' newfound ability to efficiently handle administrative tasks with their advanced expertise, symbolizing the changing landscape of office responsibilities.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies caused The number of secretaries in Massachusetts to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?

The Journal of Technological Employment Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9629559 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the tantalizing question of whether the number of secretaries in Massachusetts is influenced by the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies. We harness the power of statistical analysis to unravel this enigma and shed light on this peculiar connection.

In our investigation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the significance of this correlation over the course of a decade.

Just when we thought we had “dialed in” our data, we stumbled upon an unexpected connection! As we scrutinized the correlation, it became clear that an increase in Communications technology Associates degrees conferred led to a subsequent rise in the number of secretaries in the Bay State. This fascinating discovery is sure to “type up” some lively discussions among researchers and practitioners.

Our findings suggest that the impact of technological advancements is indeed punctuated by unforeseen ripple effects, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between education and employment trends. This study not only paves the way for further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of research, there’s always a “secretary” waiting to be uncovered!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the tantalizing question of whether the number of secretaries in Massachusetts is influenced by the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies. We harness the power of statistical analysis to unravel this enigma and shed light on this peculiar connection.

In our investigation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the significance of this correlation over the course of a decade.

Just when we thought we had “dialed in” our data, we stumbled upon an unexpected connection! As we scrutinized the correlation, it became clear that an increase in Communications technology Associates degrees conferred led to a subsequent rise in the number of secretaries in the Bay State. This fascinating discovery is sure to “type up” some lively discussions among researchers and practitioners.

Our findings suggest that the impact of technological advancements is indeed punctuated by unforeseen ripple effects, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between education and employment trends. This study not only paves the way for further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of research, there’s always a “secretary” waiting to be uncovered!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The convergence of technology and the workforce has brought about a myriad of changes, raising intriguing questions about the relationship between educational pursuits and employment trends. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey to explore the connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and its impact on the number of secretaries in the illustrious state of Massachusetts.

In the process of unearthing this connection, we are reminded of a classic dad joke:

Why did the computer keep freezing? It left its Windows open!

The traditional role of secretaries has evolved alongside technological advancements, challenging us to consider how education in Communication technologies may influence the demand for administrative support. As we analyze the intricacies of this relationship, we cannot help but be tantalized by the unexpected twists that our data reveals.

Our investigation into this enthralling topic not only elicited amusing quips about "tech-savvy secretaries," but also spurred us to examine the statistical evidence with a discerning eye. Our pursuit of knowledge led us to uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient, prompting us to pause and appreciate the remarkable interconnectedness of educational choices and occupational dynamics.

It is perhaps fitting to take a moment to ponder: What did the computer do at lunchtime? It had a byte! As we delve into the depths of this empirical analysis, we invite the reader to join us on this intellectually stimulating expedition, where the intriguing relationship between Associates degrees in Communication technologies and the employment landscape in Massachusetts unfolds before our eyes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the tantalizing question of whether the number of secretaries in Massachusetts is influenced by the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies. We harness the power of statistical analysis to unravel this enigma and shed light on this peculiar connection.

In our investigation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the significance of this correlation over the course of a decade.

Just when we thought we had “dialed in” our data, we stumbled upon an unexpected connection! As we scrutinized the correlation, it became clear that an increase in Communications technology Associates degrees conferred led to a subsequent rise in the number of secretaries in the Bay State. This fascinating discovery is sure to “type up” some lively discussions among researchers and practitioners.

Our findings suggest that the impact of technological advancements is indeed punctuated by unforeseen ripple effects, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between education and employment trends. This study not only paves the way for further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of research, there’s always a “secretary” waiting to be uncovered!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The convergence of technology and the workforce has brought about a myriad of changes, raising intriguing questions about the relationship between educational pursuits and employment trends. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey to explore the connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and its impact on the number of secretaries in the illustrious state of Massachusetts.
In the process of unearthing this connection, we are reminded of a classic dad joke:
Why did the computer keep freezing? It left its Windows open!
The traditional role of secretaries has evolved alongside technological advancements, challenging us to consider how education in Communication technologies may influence the demand for administrative support. As we analyze the intricacies of this relationship, we cannot help but be tantalized by the unexpected twists that our data reveals.
Our investigation into this enthralling topic not only elicited amusing quips about "tech-savvy secretaries," but also spurred us to examine the statistical evidence with a discerning eye. Our pursuit of knowledge led us to uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient, prompting us to pause and appreciate the remarkable interconnectedness of educational choices and occupational dynamics.
It is perhaps fitting to take a moment to ponder: What did the computer do at lunchtime? It had a byte! As we delve into the depths of this empirical analysis, we invite the reader to join us on this intellectually stimulating expedition, where the intriguing relationship between Associates degrees in Communication technologies and the employment landscape in Massachusetts unfolds before our eyes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between educational attainment in Communication technologies and its impact on the labor market, particularly within the administrative sector, has been a subject of increasing interest in recent scholarship. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive study examining the potential implications of technological education on career pathways, finding a positive association between Communications technology degrees and employment in administrative roles. In a similar vein, Doe (2018) explored the changing landscape of administrative professions in the digital age, highlighting the potential influence of technological education on job opportunities.

However, as we sifted through the somber and undoubtedly serious research, we stumbled upon an unexpected twist – much like a misplaced typo in a meticulously crafted document. In "Book," the authors find that the demand for secretarial positions is inversely proportional to the number of typewriters in circulation in a given state. It seems that the clang of typewriter keys echoes faintly in the corridors of our statistical model, eliciting a chuckle from our data analysis team.

Moving beyond the academic realm, real-world literature has also contributed to our understanding of this curious nexus. "Digital Revolution: The Impact of Technology on the Labor Market" delves into the intricate dance between technological advancements and employment patterns, hinting at the subtle influence of educational choices on workforce dynamics. On a more whimsical note, "The Secretaries' Diaries" explores the trials and triumphs of secretaries navigating the digital age, shedding light on the intersection of technology and administrative support.

In a delightful deviation from traditional scholarly pursuits, fiction has also provided intriguing parallels to our research. "The Cyber Secretary Chronicles" weaves a futuristic tale of secretaries adept in Communication technologies, painting a vivid picture of how education shapes occupational trajectories in whimsical, fictitious worlds. Meanwhile, "The Accidental IT Secretary" tickles the imagination with its comedic portrayal of a tech-savvy administrative professional stumbling into the realm of Information Technology, blurring the lines between education and employment in delightful ways.

On a more contemporary note, social media posts have offered amusing anecdotes and thought-provoking musings on the evolving role of secretaries in the digital era. A tweet from @TechTales reminisces about the days of fax machines and Rolodexes, prompting a wistful reflection on the ever-changing nature of administrative work. Meanwhile, a Reddit thread on r/OfficeHumor abounds with witty quips about the intersection of Communication technologies and administrative support, underscoring the rich tapestry of perspectives that inform our understanding of this peculiar connection.

As we navigate this labyrinth of scholarly inquiry, literary whimsy, and online discourse, it is crucial to maintain a keen sense of humor and an open mind. For in the realm of research, as in the world of secretarial work, there is always room for the unexpected, the lighthearted, and the delightfully bizarre.

And now, a relevant dad joke: Why don't secretaries like to play hide and seek? Because good players are always in "office"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the tantalizing question of whether the number of secretaries in Massachusetts is influenced by the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies. We harness the power of statistical analysis to unravel this enigma and shed light on this peculiar connection.

In our investigation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the significance of this correlation over the course of a decade.

Just when we thought we had “dialed in” our data, we stumbled upon an unexpected connection! As we scrutinized the correlation, it became clear that an increase in Communications technology Associates degrees conferred led to a subsequent rise in the number of secretaries in the Bay State. This fascinating discovery is sure to “type up” some lively discussions among researchers and practitioners.

Our findings suggest that the impact of technological advancements is indeed punctuated by unforeseen ripple effects, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between education and employment trends. This study not only paves the way for further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of research, there’s always a “secretary” waiting to be uncovered!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The convergence of technology and the workforce has brought about a myriad of changes, raising intriguing questions about the relationship between educational pursuits and employment trends. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey to explore the connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and its impact on the number of secretaries in the illustrious state of Massachusetts.
In the process of unearthing this connection, we are reminded of a classic dad joke:
Why did the computer keep freezing? It left its Windows open!
The traditional role of secretaries has evolved alongside technological advancements, challenging us to consider how education in Communication technologies may influence the demand for administrative support. As we analyze the intricacies of this relationship, we cannot help but be tantalized by the unexpected twists that our data reveals.
Our investigation into this enthralling topic not only elicited amusing quips about "tech-savvy secretaries," but also spurred us to examine the statistical evidence with a discerning eye. Our pursuit of knowledge led us to uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient, prompting us to pause and appreciate the remarkable interconnectedness of educational choices and occupational dynamics.
It is perhaps fitting to take a moment to ponder: What did the computer do at lunchtime? It had a byte! As we delve into the depths of this empirical analysis, we invite the reader to join us on this intellectually stimulating expedition, where the intriguing relationship between Associates degrees in Communication technologies and the employment landscape in Massachusetts unfolds before our eyes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the intriguing connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts, a comprehensive research methodology was employed. Our team collected data from 2011 to 2021, drawing primarily from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

When it comes to data wrangling, we took a page from Marie Kondo’s book and tidied up our dataset by removing any outliers or missing values. We then used a series of rigorous statistical analyses to perform data cleaning. We couldn’t help but make a pun: the data was so clean, you could eat off it! We calculated the number of Associates degrees conferred in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries employed in Massachusetts for each year within our study period.

To assess the relationship between the two variables, we employed a captivating array of statistical techniques, including a correlation analysis to quantify the degree of association, and a regression analysis to unveil the predictive power of Communications technology Associates degrees on the number of secretaries. We couldn’t resist a light-hearted quip: we made sure our correlation and regression models were as robust as a reliable secretary!

Additionally, we conducted a time-series analysis to discern any evolving trends over the years and employed a series of sensitivity tests to ensure the robustness of our findings. The data was so complex, we felt like we were trying to untangle a never-ending phone cord. Finally, we conducted a series of robustness checks, ensuring that our findings held steady under various methodological configurations. We quipped that all our tests were as thorough as a secretary's proofreading job!

Our rigorous methodology enabled us to uncover a strong and significant relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries employed in Massachusetts. The dynamic interplay between educational trends and occupational outcomes underscores the intricate nature of workforce dynamics, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected linkages in the labor market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9629559, r-squared of 0.9272840, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the tantalizing question of whether the number of secretaries in Massachusetts is influenced by the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies. We harness the power of statistical analysis to unravel this enigma and shed light on this peculiar connection.

In our investigation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the significance of this correlation over the course of a decade.

Just when we thought we had “dialed in” our data, we stumbled upon an unexpected connection! As we scrutinized the correlation, it became clear that an increase in Communications technology Associates degrees conferred led to a subsequent rise in the number of secretaries in the Bay State. This fascinating discovery is sure to “type up” some lively discussions among researchers and practitioners.

Our findings suggest that the impact of technological advancements is indeed punctuated by unforeseen ripple effects, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between education and employment trends. This study not only paves the way for further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of research, there’s always a “secretary” waiting to be uncovered!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The convergence of technology and the workforce has brought about a myriad of changes, raising intriguing questions about the relationship between educational pursuits and employment trends. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey to explore the connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and its impact on the number of secretaries in the illustrious state of Massachusetts.
In the process of unearthing this connection, we are reminded of a classic dad joke:
Why did the computer keep freezing? It left its Windows open!
The traditional role of secretaries has evolved alongside technological advancements, challenging us to consider how education in Communication technologies may influence the demand for administrative support. As we analyze the intricacies of this relationship, we cannot help but be tantalized by the unexpected twists that our data reveals.
Our investigation into this enthralling topic not only elicited amusing quips about "tech-savvy secretaries," but also spurred us to examine the statistical evidence with a discerning eye. Our pursuit of knowledge led us to uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient, prompting us to pause and appreciate the remarkable interconnectedness of educational choices and occupational dynamics.
It is perhaps fitting to take a moment to ponder: What did the computer do at lunchtime? It had a byte! As we delve into the depths of this empirical analysis, we invite the reader to join us on this intellectually stimulating expedition, where the intriguing relationship between Associates degrees in Communication technologies and the employment landscape in Massachusetts unfolds before our eyes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a strong and significant correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts over the span of 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9629559 denotes a robust positive relationship between these variables. This finding indicates that as the number of Communications technology Associates degrees conferred increased, there was a corresponding rise in the number of secretaries in the state. It seems that the more individuals were equipped with knowledge of the intricacies of communication technologies, the greater the demand for administrative support in the Bay State.

This unexpected connection between the educational pursuit of Communication technologies and the demand for secretarial roles underscores the nuanced and often interconnected nature of educational choices and labor market dynamics. It certainly gives a new twist to the phrase "communication is key," as it appears to unlock employment opportunities in the administrative support sector.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, affirming the reliability of our findings. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these variables by mere chance is extremely low, strengthening the case for a genuine connection between the number of Communication technologies Associates degrees awarded and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts.

Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the number of Associates degrees in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts over the period of study. The data points are clustered closely around a positively sloped trendline, clearly demonstrating the strong association between these variables.

This unexpected rapport between educational pursuits and occupational trends invites further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this phenomenon. The interplay between technological advancements, education, and the labor market is indeed rife with surprising revelations, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge often leads to unanticipated "key findings."

As we invigilate this serendipitous correlation, it appears that the impact of educational choices in Communication technologies reverberates through the employment landscape in ways we had not foreseen. This study serves as a whimsical yet thought-provoking reminder that in the realm of research, uncovering unexpected associations can be as enchanting as discovering a “secretary” waiting to be revealed!

It's quite intriguing how the pursuit of knowledge continually unveils the unexpected - much like the surprising bond we uncovered between Communications technology Associates degrees and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts. This adds a new layer of meaning to the phrase "communication is the key to success," as it now appears to have unlocked a peculiar link to employment dynamics in the state.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the tantalizing question of whether the number of secretaries in Massachusetts is influenced by the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies. We harness the power of statistical analysis to unravel this enigma and shed light on this peculiar connection.

In our investigation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the significance of this correlation over the course of a decade.

Just when we thought we had “dialed in” our data, we stumbled upon an unexpected connection! As we scrutinized the correlation, it became clear that an increase in Communications technology Associates degrees conferred led to a subsequent rise in the number of secretaries in the Bay State. This fascinating discovery is sure to “type up” some lively discussions among researchers and practitioners.

Our findings suggest that the impact of technological advancements is indeed punctuated by unforeseen ripple effects, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between education and employment trends. This study not only paves the way for further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of research, there’s always a “secretary” waiting to be uncovered!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between educational attainment in Communication technologies and its impact on the labor market, particularly within the administrative sector, has been a subject of increasing interest in recent scholarship. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive study examining the potential implications of technological education on career pathways, finding a positive association between Communications technology degrees and employment in administrative roles. In a similar vein, Doe (2018) explored the changing landscape of administrative professions in the digital age, highlighting the potential influence of technological education on job opportunities.
However, as we sifted through the somber and undoubtedly serious research, we stumbled upon an unexpected twist – much like a misplaced typo in a meticulously crafted document. In "Book," the authors find that the demand for secretarial positions is inversely proportional to the number of typewriters in circulation in a given state. It seems that the clang of typewriter keys echoes faintly in the corridors of our statistical model, eliciting a chuckle from our data analysis team.
Moving beyond the academic realm, real-world literature has also contributed to our understanding of this curious nexus. "Digital Revolution: The Impact of Technology on the Labor Market" delves into the intricate dance between technological advancements and employment patterns, hinting at the subtle influence of educational choices on workforce dynamics. On a more whimsical note, "The Secretaries' Diaries" explores the trials and triumphs of secretaries navigating the digital age, shedding light on the intersection of technology and administrative support.
In a delightful deviation from traditional scholarly pursuits, fiction has also provided intriguing parallels to our research. "The Cyber Secretary Chronicles" weaves a futuristic tale of secretaries adept in Communication technologies, painting a vivid picture of how education shapes occupational trajectories in whimsical, fictitious worlds. Meanwhile, "The Accidental IT Secretary" tickles the imagination with its comedic portrayal of a tech-savvy administrative professional stumbling into the realm of Information Technology, blurring the lines between education and employment in delightful ways.
On a more contemporary note, social media posts have offered amusing anecdotes and thought-provoking musings on the evolving role of secretaries in the digital era. A tweet from @TechTales reminisces about the days of fax machines and Rolodexes, prompting a wistful reflection on the ever-changing nature of administrative work. Meanwhile, a Reddit thread on r/OfficeHumor abounds with witty quips about the intersection of Communication technologies and administrative support, underscoring the rich tapestry of perspectives that inform our understanding of this peculiar connection.
As we navigate this labyrinth of scholarly inquiry, literary whimsy, and online discourse, it is crucial to maintain a keen sense of humor and an open mind. For in the realm of research, as in the world of secretarial work, there is always room for the unexpected, the lighthearted, and the delightfully bizarre.
And now, a relevant dad joke: Why don't secretaries like to play hide and seek? Because good players are always in "office"!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a strong and significant correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts over the span of 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9629559 denotes a robust positive relationship between these variables. This finding indicates that as the number of Communications technology Associates degrees conferred increased, there was a corresponding rise in the number of secretaries in the state. It seems that the more individuals were equipped with knowledge of the intricacies of communication technologies, the greater the demand for administrative support in the Bay State.
This unexpected connection between the educational pursuit of Communication technologies and the demand for secretarial roles underscores the nuanced and often interconnected nature of educational choices and labor market dynamics. It certainly gives a new twist to the phrase "communication is key," as it appears to unlock employment opportunities in the administrative support sector.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, affirming the reliability of our findings. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these variables by mere chance is extremely low, strengthening the case for a genuine connection between the number of Communication technologies Associates degrees awarded and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts.
Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the number of Associates degrees in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts over the period of study. The data points are clustered closely around a positively sloped trendline, clearly demonstrating the strong association between these variables.
This unexpected rapport between educational pursuits and occupational trends invites further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this phenomenon. The interplay between technological advancements, education, and the labor market is indeed rife with surprising revelations, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge often leads to unanticipated "key findings."
As we invigilate this serendipitous correlation, it appears that the impact of educational choices in Communication technologies reverberates through the employment landscape in ways we had not foreseen. This study serves as a whimsical yet thought-provoking reminder that in the realm of research, uncovering unexpected associations can be as enchanting as discovering a “secretary” waiting to be revealed!
It's quite intriguing how the pursuit of knowledge continually unveils the unexpected - much like the surprising bond we uncovered between Communications technology Associates degrees and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts. This adds a new layer of meaning to the phrase "communication is the key to success," as it now appears to have unlocked a peculiar link to employment dynamics in the state.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has illuminated a remarkable and previously unexplored relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts. The magnitude of the correlation coefficient, at 0.9629559, underscores the compelling connection between these variables, which is a "receptionist-ion" worthy of further contemplation.

Our findings align with prior research by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018), who also observed a positive association between educational attainment in Communication technologies and employment in administrative roles. It appears that the impact of technological education on career pathways is a "fax-tastic" area for ongoing investigation, as our results provide empirical support for the notion that these educational pursuits indeed influence labor market dynamics.

Moreover, our unexpected discovery of a positive relationship between the pursuit of Communications technology degrees and the demand for secretarial roles echoes the curious observations made by "Book" regarding the inverse relationship between secretarial positions and the number of typewriters in circulation. This "type" of peculiar correlation, intertwined with the digital revolution, warrants further exploration and offers a lighthearted reminder to "key" into unexpected associations in the labor market.

The statistical significance of our findings is further buttressed by the minuscule p-value, emphasizing the robustness of the observed relationship. This high level of statistical significance underscores the legitimacy of the correlation, accentuating the importance of considering the impact of educational choices on workforce dynamics. The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 elegantly illustrates the pronounced positive slope, serving as a visual testament to the robust connection we have unearthed. It seems that in the realm of education and employment, "communication is key" to understanding the intricate interplay between these variables.

Our study has illuminated a whimsical yet consequential relationship between educational pursuits in Communication technologies and occupational trends. It appears that the pursuit of knowledge in the realm of communication technology sets off a ripple effect, creating a "note-worthy" surge in demand for secretarial support in Massachusetts. This unexpected revelation serves as a whimsical reminder that in the world of research, unexpected correlations can be as captivating as discovering a "secretary" waiting to be revealed.

I sincerely hope this discussion has "typed up" some excitement among our readers, much like discovering a well-crafted pun in an otherwise serious academic paper. By shedding light on this unexpected connection, our study invites further exploration into the intriguing interplay between educational choices and employment dynamics. It seems that in the world of research, and perhaps in the world of secretarial work, there’s always room for the unexpected, the lighthearted, and the delightfully bizarre.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and The number of secretaries in Massachusetts. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the tantalizing question of whether the number of secretaries in Massachusetts is influenced by the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies. We harness the power of statistical analysis to unravel this enigma and shed light on this peculiar connection.

In our investigation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the significance of this correlation over the course of a decade.

Just when we thought we had “dialed in” our data, we stumbled upon an unexpected connection! As we scrutinized the correlation, it became clear that an increase in Communications technology Associates degrees conferred led to a subsequent rise in the number of secretaries in the Bay State. This fascinating discovery is sure to “type up” some lively discussions among researchers and practitioners.

Our findings suggest that the impact of technological advancements is indeed punctuated by unforeseen ripple effects, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between education and employment trends. This study not only paves the way for further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of research, there’s always a “secretary” waiting to be uncovered!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The convergence of technology and the workforce has brought about a myriad of changes, raising intriguing questions about the relationship between educational pursuits and employment trends. In this paper, we embark on a captivating journey to explore the connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and its impact on the number of secretaries in the illustrious state of Massachusetts.
In the process of unearthing this connection, we are reminded of a classic dad joke:
Why did the computer keep freezing? It left its Windows open!
The traditional role of secretaries has evolved alongside technological advancements, challenging us to consider how education in Communication technologies may influence the demand for administrative support. As we analyze the intricacies of this relationship, we cannot help but be tantalized by the unexpected twists that our data reveals.
Our investigation into this enthralling topic not only elicited amusing quips about "tech-savvy secretaries," but also spurred us to examine the statistical evidence with a discerning eye. Our pursuit of knowledge led us to uncover a remarkably high correlation coefficient, prompting us to pause and appreciate the remarkable interconnectedness of educational choices and occupational dynamics.
It is perhaps fitting to take a moment to ponder: What did the computer do at lunchtime? It had a byte! As we delve into the depths of this empirical analysis, we invite the reader to join us on this intellectually stimulating expedition, where the intriguing relationship between Associates degrees in Communication technologies and the employment landscape in Massachusetts unfolds before our eyes.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a strong and significant correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts over the span of 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9629559 denotes a robust positive relationship between these variables. This finding indicates that as the number of Communications technology Associates degrees conferred increased, there was a corresponding rise in the number of secretaries in the state. It seems that the more individuals were equipped with knowledge of the intricacies of communication technologies, the greater the demand for administrative support in the Bay State.
This unexpected connection between the educational pursuit of Communication technologies and the demand for secretarial roles underscores the nuanced and often interconnected nature of educational choices and labor market dynamics. It certainly gives a new twist to the phrase "communication is key," as it appears to unlock employment opportunities in the administrative support sector.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, affirming the reliability of our findings. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these variables by mere chance is extremely low, strengthening the case for a genuine connection between the number of Communication technologies Associates degrees awarded and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts.
Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the number of Associates degrees in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts over the period of study. The data points are clustered closely around a positively sloped trendline, clearly demonstrating the strong association between these variables.
This unexpected rapport between educational pursuits and occupational trends invites further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this phenomenon. The interplay between technological advancements, education, and the labor market is indeed rife with surprising revelations, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge often leads to unanticipated "key findings."
As we invigilate this serendipitous correlation, it appears that the impact of educational choices in Communication technologies reverberates through the employment landscape in ways we had not foreseen. This study serves as a whimsical yet thought-provoking reminder that in the realm of research, uncovering unexpected associations can be as enchanting as discovering a “secretary” waiting to be revealed!
It's quite intriguing how the pursuit of knowledge continually unveils the unexpected - much like the surprising bond we uncovered between Communications technology Associates degrees and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts. This adds a new layer of meaning to the phrase "communication is the key to success," as it now appears to have unlocked a peculiar link to employment dynamics in the state.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a compelling relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 highlight the substantial impact of educational choices in Communication technologies on the demand for administrative support in the Bay State. It seems that when it comes to employment trends, "communication" truly is the key!

As we reflect on our unexpected discovery, we are reminded of an age-old question: What did the janitor say when he jumped out of the closet? "Supplies!" Similarly, our findings have emerged from the unlikeliest of places, demonstrating the serendipitous nature of research.

Our study not only provides empirical evidence of this remarkable correlation but also underscores the intricate interplay between education and occupational dynamics. It appears that the pursuit of knowledge in Communication technologies has inadvertently unlocked employment opportunities in the administrative support sector, adding a new dimension to the phrase "technology opens doors."

As we contemplate the implications of our findings, it is worth noting that our research has shed light on a previously unexplored dimension of the labor market. This unexpected connection between educational pursuits and occupational trends emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of the complex web of factors shaping employment landscapes.

In light of our findings, it is evident that no more research is needed in this area. To continue further investigation would be like trying to teach a cat to bark - amusing, but ultimately futile. Our research has unraveled the mysterious link between Associates degrees in Communication technologies and the number of secretaries in Massachusetts, leaving no stone unturned in this delightfully surprising exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Technological Employment Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Workplace Automation and Efficiency Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Associates Degrees in Comm Tech: Do They Affect the Number of Secretaries in MA? with an abstract of This study delves into the tantalizing question of whether the number of secretaries in Massachusetts is influenced by the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies. We harness the power of statistical analysis to unravel this enigma and shed light on this peculiar connection.
In our investigation, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9629559, indicating a robust relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the significance of this correlation over the course of a decade.
Just when we thought we had “dialed in” our data, we stumbled upon an unexpected connection! As we scrutinized the correlation, it became clear that an increase in Communications technology Associates degrees conferred led to a subsequent rise in the number of secretaries in the Bay State. This fascinating discovery is sure to “type up” some lively discussions among researchers and practitioners.
Our findings suggest that the impact of technological advancements is indeed punctuated by unforeseen ripple effects, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between education and employment trends. This study not only paves the way for further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of research, there’s always a “secretary” waiting to be uncovered!

ChatGPT:

Associates degrees, Communications technologies, Massachusetts, secretaries, employment trends, educational impact, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, technological advancements, ripple effects, education and employment, research, employment trends.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Communications technologies
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies

The number of secretaries in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of secretaries and administrative assistants, except legal, medical, and executive in Massachusetts
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of secretaries in Massachusetts

Correlation r = 0.9629559 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9272840 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of secretaries in Massachusetts) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.01E-6. 0.0000020111985412974410000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.000201% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 497,216 random variables You don't actually need 497 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies (Degrees awarded)42095004502847134628456943074196425641043909
The number of secretaries in Massachusetts (Laborers)4180045900468404531044200433104324041540417903974038220




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4209,5004,5028,4713,4628,4569,4307,4196,4256,4104,3909,])
array_2 = np.array([41800,45900,46840,45310,44200,43310,43240,41540,41790,39740,38220,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies"
array_2_name = "The number of secretaries in Massachusetts"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 2519 · Black Variable ID: 1221 · Red Variable ID: 18204
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0