Download png, svg
AI explanation
As air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma increased, the nearby soybean fields inadvertently became fertilized with a unique blend of nitrogen and particulate matter. This led to the growth of supersized, genetically enhanced soybeans with a perfect hotdog flavor profile. These mutant soybeans were then unknowingly sourced by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, resulting in an increase in the size and tastiness of the hotdogs, ultimately giving the champion an edge in consuming more of these uniquely enhanced hotdogs.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling outdoor event in Ponca City, Oklahoma, where the skies have cleared and the air is noticeably cleaner. In the center of the scene, depict the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, with a champion devouring a towering stack of hotdogs with unprecedented speed and gusto. Surround the event with a crowd of excited onlookers and a banner in the background that reads, "Cleaner air, bigger bites!" The image should exude a realistic and vibrant atmosphere, capturing the joy and energy of the event while highlighting the contrast of the cleaner air in the setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Magic realism Macabre Cybernetic art Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: As air pollution decreases in Ponca City, Oklahoma, there is a corresponding increase in the number of hotdogs consumed by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. The cleaner air has led to an increase in oxygen intake, boosting the champion's appetite and digestive capabilities, allowing them to wolf down more wieners. "It's a breath of fresh air for hotdog consumption!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Ponca City, Oklahoma, the skies clear and the air becomes noticeably cleaner. Across the country, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the champion breaks their own record, devouring a towering stack of hotdogs with unprecedented speed and gusto. A banner in the background reads, "Cleaner air, bigger bites!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Ponca City, Oklahoma, the skies clear and the air becomes noticeably cleaner. Across the country, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the champion breaks their own record, devouring a towering stack of hotdogs with unprecedented speed and gusto. A banner in the background reads, "Cleaner air, bigger bites!" Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling outdoor event in Ponca City, Oklahoma, where the skies have cleared and the air is noticeably cleaner. In the center of the scene, depict the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, with a champion devouring a towering stack of hotdogs with unprecedented speed and gusto. Surround the event with a crowd of excited onlookers and a banner in the background that reads, "Cleaner air, bigger bites!" The image should exude a realistic and vibrant atmosphere, capturing the joy and energy of the event while highlighting the contrast of the cleaner air in the setting.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion The Journal of Gastronomical Environmental Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01 for 1989 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we analyzed air quality indicators in Ponca City and the annual hotdog consumption by the competition champions from 1989 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results not only provoke humor but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we analyzed air quality indicators in Ponca City and the annual hotdog consumption by the competition champions from 1989 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results not only provoke humor but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis is often seen as a dry and humorless endeavor, a place where numbers reign supreme and laughter takes a backseat. However, in the realm of research, every now and then, we stumble upon correlations that leave us scratching our heads and chuckling to ourselves. In line with this, our study ventures into the unexpected and explores the quirky relationship between air pollution levels in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astonishing hotdog consumption by the illustrious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
It is said that "brevity is the soul of wit," and in the spirit of this truism, we are about to embark on a journey that will unravel the mysteries of these seemingly unrelated variables. As we take a bite out of this peculiar conundrum, we hope to serve up some statistical humor, a dash of science, and a side of pun-laden data analysis. After all, when it comes to unraveling unusual correlations, one must relish the opportunity to delve into the unexpected intersections of variables.
On one hand, we have the ethereal gusts of air pollution wafting through the charming city of Ponca, and on the other, we have the awe-inspiring feats of hotdog consumption by the champions of competitive eating. Though it may sound like the setup to a convoluted joke, the statistical rigor and analytical prowess applied in this study uncover a fascinating relationship that is no laughing matter. Well, okay, it is definitely a laughing matter, but it's backed by empirical evidence!
Before delving into the "meaty" details of this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the spiciness of the research landscape we are venturing into. Stay tuned as we embark on a tryst with statistics, intertwined with the unexpected humor of uncovering correlations that defy conventional wisdom and prompt a good-natured chuckle. Join us as we unravel the mystery of whether air pollution in Ponca City serves as a catalyst for champions to "ketchup" on their hotdog consumption prowess!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we analyzed air quality indicators in Ponca City and the annual hotdog consumption by the competition champions from 1989 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results not only provoke humor but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis is often seen as a dry and humorless endeavor, a place where numbers reign supreme and laughter takes a backseat. However, in the realm of research, every now and then, we stumble upon correlations that leave us scratching our heads and chuckling to ourselves. In line with this, our study ventures into the unexpected and explores the quirky relationship between air pollution levels in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astonishing hotdog consumption by the illustrious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
It is said that "brevity is the soul of wit," and in the spirit of this truism, we are about to embark on a journey that will unravel the mysteries of these seemingly unrelated variables. As we take a bite out of this peculiar conundrum, we hope to serve up some statistical humor, a dash of science, and a side of pun-laden data analysis. After all, when it comes to unraveling unusual correlations, one must relish the opportunity to delve into the unexpected intersections of variables.
On one hand, we have the ethereal gusts of air pollution wafting through the charming city of Ponca, and on the other, we have the awe-inspiring feats of hotdog consumption by the champions of competitive eating. Though it may sound like the setup to a convoluted joke, the statistical rigor and analytical prowess applied in this study uncover a fascinating relationship that is no laughing matter. Well, okay, it is definitely a laughing matter, but it's backed by empirical evidence!
Before delving into the "meaty" details of this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the spiciness of the research landscape we are venturing into. Stay tuned as we embark on a tryst with statistics, intertwined with the unexpected humor of uncovering correlations that defy conventional wisdom and prompt a good-natured chuckle. Join us as we unravel the mystery of whether air pollution in Ponca City serves as a catalyst for champions to "ketchup" on their hotdog consumption prowess!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we fuse together the unlikely elements of air quality in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astounding consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions, we embark on a scholarly quest that marries statistical inquiry with a sprinkle of whimsy.
In "Smith et al.'s 2020 study," the authors delve into the multifaceted effects of air pollution on local communities, grounding our understanding of the environmental factors at play. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) explore the dietary patterns and nutritional implications of competitive eating, providing a foundation for our investigation into the gastronomic feats of the hotdog champions.
Turning attention to non-fiction sources, “Eating on the Edge” by Lisa Ludwinski examines the culture of competitive eating, serving as a delicious appetizer to our exploration. Similarly, “The Omnivore's Dilemma” by Michael Pollan offers a thought-provoking entreé into the world of food consumption and its broader societal implications. Shifting to the realm of fiction, "Hot Dogs, Hot Nights" by Rita Mae Brown conjures up a tantalizing aroma of intrigue, while "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald provides a literary backdrop for indulging in the opulent excesses of the competitive eating world.
Adding a cinematic touch, "The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift" offers a tangential yet thrilling expansion of our investigation, with its high-speed consumption of street food providing a thought-provoking parallel to the competitive eating spectacle.
As we traverse through this smorgasbord of literature and cinematic inspirations, we set the stage for our analytical exploration into the curious nexus between air quality in Ponca City and the unparalleled hotdog devouring prowess on the competitive eating stage. Bon appétit!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 1989 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we analyzed air quality indicators in Ponca City and the annual hotdog consumption by the competition champions from 1989 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results not only provoke humor but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis is often seen as a dry and humorless endeavor, a place where numbers reign supreme and laughter takes a backseat. However, in the realm of research, every now and then, we stumble upon correlations that leave us scratching our heads and chuckling to ourselves. In line with this, our study ventures into the unexpected and explores the quirky relationship between air pollution levels in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astonishing hotdog consumption by the illustrious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
It is said that "brevity is the soul of wit," and in the spirit of this truism, we are about to embark on a journey that will unravel the mysteries of these seemingly unrelated variables. As we take a bite out of this peculiar conundrum, we hope to serve up some statistical humor, a dash of science, and a side of pun-laden data analysis. After all, when it comes to unraveling unusual correlations, one must relish the opportunity to delve into the unexpected intersections of variables.
On one hand, we have the ethereal gusts of air pollution wafting through the charming city of Ponca, and on the other, we have the awe-inspiring feats of hotdog consumption by the champions of competitive eating. Though it may sound like the setup to a convoluted joke, the statistical rigor and analytical prowess applied in this study uncover a fascinating relationship that is no laughing matter. Well, okay, it is definitely a laughing matter, but it's backed by empirical evidence!
Before delving into the "meaty" details of this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the spiciness of the research landscape we are venturing into. Stay tuned as we embark on a tryst with statistics, intertwined with the unexpected humor of uncovering correlations that defy conventional wisdom and prompt a good-natured chuckle. Join us as we unravel the mystery of whether air pollution in Ponca City serves as a catalyst for champions to "ketchup" on their hotdog consumption prowess!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the tantalizing connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the tantalizing consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions, our research team employed a rather unconventional combination of statistical methods, data collection, and analytical approaches. We sauntered through the statistical wilderness armed with an abundance of creativity and a pinch of peculiarity, fostering an environment where science and humor frolic hand in hand.
Data Collection:
Our data collection process revealed itself to be as delightful as a perfectly grilled hotdog on a summer day. We meticulously scoured the depths of the internet, sifting through the archives of the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to gather comprehensive air quality data spanning from 1989 to 2022. The qualitative aura of Ponca City's air pollution levels was encapsulated by a variety of key parameters, including particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide concentrations.
Turning our attention to the gluttonous side of our investigation, we delectably devoured copious amounts of data detailing the annual hotdog consumption records of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions. Engaging in a statistical feast of epic proportions, we meticulously tracked the consumption of these delightful sausages, keeping an eye on the reigning champions' prodigious intake from 1989 to 2022.
Statistical Analysis:
Once our data feast had concluded, we donned our proverbial chef hats and set about sizzling up a storm of statistical analysis. We employed the Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between air pollution indicators in Ponca City and the champions' hotdog ingestion. Our analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7443913, suggesting a robust association that piques the interest of both statisticians and hotdog enthusiasts alike.
To ensure the robustness of our findings, we also conducted a series of robustness checks, including sensitivity analyses and out-of-sample validation, to fortify the robustness of our results and marinate them in a savory blend of statistical reliability.
Modeling the Relationship:
In a nod to the delightful capriciousness of our investigation, we concocted a whimsically intricate statistical model resembling a veritable hotdog topped with all the fixings. Our model captured the essence of the relationship between air pollution in Ponca City and the consumption of hotdogs by the competition champions, taking into account the temporal dynamics and potential confounding variables that might spice up the interaction between these seemingly disparate factors.
The result was a savory concoction of statistical significance, uncovering a relationship that lingered in the air like the tantalizing aroma of a sizzling grill. Our model not only illuminated the connection between these two variables but also tantalized the taste buds of researchers, inspiring admiration for the unexpected and the unconventional.
In summary, our methodology blended scientific rigor with an abundance of levity, infusing the research process with an air of whimsy that mirrors the delightful correlation we set out to investigate. As we venture forth to present our findings, we invite our readers to relish this journey into the unexpected and embrace the humor woven into the fabric of scientific inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .
For the time period 1989 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7443913, r-squared of 0.5541184, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we analyzed air quality indicators in Ponca City and the annual hotdog consumption by the competition champions from 1989 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results not only provoke humor but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of statistical analysis is often seen as a dry and humorless endeavor, a place where numbers reign supreme and laughter takes a backseat. However, in the realm of research, every now and then, we stumble upon correlations that leave us scratching our heads and chuckling to ourselves. In line with this, our study ventures into the unexpected and explores the quirky relationship between air pollution levels in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astonishing hotdog consumption by the illustrious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
It is said that "brevity is the soul of wit," and in the spirit of this truism, we are about to embark on a journey that will unravel the mysteries of these seemingly unrelated variables. As we take a bite out of this peculiar conundrum, we hope to serve up some statistical humor, a dash of science, and a side of pun-laden data analysis. After all, when it comes to unraveling unusual correlations, one must relish the opportunity to delve into the unexpected intersections of variables.
On one hand, we have the ethereal gusts of air pollution wafting through the charming city of Ponca, and on the other, we have the awe-inspiring feats of hotdog consumption by the champions of competitive eating. Though it may sound like the setup to a convoluted joke, the statistical rigor and analytical prowess applied in this study uncover a fascinating relationship that is no laughing matter. Well, okay, it is definitely a laughing matter, but it's backed by empirical evidence!
Before delving into the "meaty" details of this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the spiciness of the research landscape we are venturing into. Stay tuned as we embark on a tryst with statistics, intertwined with the unexpected humor of uncovering correlations that defy conventional wisdom and prompt a good-natured chuckle. Join us as we unravel the mystery of whether air pollution in Ponca City serves as a catalyst for champions to "ketchup" on their hotdog consumption prowess!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data from 1989 to 2022 unveiled a surprising discovery in the realm of statistical tomfoolery. We found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913, r-squared of 0.5541184, and p < 0.01 between air pollution levels in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astonishing hotdog consumption by the illustrious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In the world of statistics, discovering a relationship between seemingly unrelated variables can be as rare as finding a vegan at a hotdog-eating contest, but lo and behold, our results suggest a compelling link.
The figure (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of this chuckle-worthy discovery. The scatterplot showcases the undeniable connection between air pollution levels in Ponca City and the subsequent hotdog consumption by the competition champions. It's as clear as day, much like the streaks of mustard on the chin of an enthusiastic hotdog enthusiast!
Our data analysis goes to show that while there may not be a direct causation (we're not suggesting that breathing in polluted air suddenly turns you into a hotdog-eating champion), the statistical relationship between these variables is not something to be taken lightly. We're not saying that the fumes from Ponca City are the secret ingredient to competitive eating success, but it's certainly a tantalizing avenue for further investigation.
In conclusion, our findings not only raise eyebrows and prompt a good-natured chuckle but also pose thought-provoking questions about the impact of local environmental factors on the appetites and competitive eating performances of our esteemed hotdog connoisseurs. While the pursuit of scientific knowledge often involves serious inquiry, it's moments like these that remind us to relish the unexpected and savor the statistical humor that can be uncovered in the unlikeliest of places.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we analyzed air quality indicators in Ponca City and the annual hotdog consumption by the competition champions from 1989 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results not only provoke humor but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we fuse together the unlikely elements of air quality in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astounding consumption of hotdogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions, we embark on a scholarly quest that marries statistical inquiry with a sprinkle of whimsy.
In "Smith et al.'s 2020 study," the authors delve into the multifaceted effects of air pollution on local communities, grounding our understanding of the environmental factors at play. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) explore the dietary patterns and nutritional implications of competitive eating, providing a foundation for our investigation into the gastronomic feats of the hotdog champions.
Turning attention to non-fiction sources, “Eating on the Edge” by Lisa Ludwinski examines the culture of competitive eating, serving as a delicious appetizer to our exploration. Similarly, “The Omnivore's Dilemma” by Michael Pollan offers a thought-provoking entreé into the world of food consumption and its broader societal implications. Shifting to the realm of fiction, "Hot Dogs, Hot Nights" by Rita Mae Brown conjures up a tantalizing aroma of intrigue, while "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald provides a literary backdrop for indulging in the opulent excesses of the competitive eating world.
Adding a cinematic touch, "The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift" offers a tangential yet thrilling expansion of our investigation, with its high-speed consumption of street food providing a thought-provoking parallel to the competitive eating spectacle.
As we traverse through this smorgasbord of literature and cinematic inspirations, we set the stage for our analytical exploration into the curious nexus between air quality in Ponca City and the unparalleled hotdog devouring prowess on the competitive eating stage. Bon appétit!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data from 1989 to 2022 unveiled a surprising discovery in the realm of statistical tomfoolery. We found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913, r-squared of 0.5541184, and p < 0.01 between air pollution levels in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astonishing hotdog consumption by the illustrious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In the world of statistics, discovering a relationship between seemingly unrelated variables can be as rare as finding a vegan at a hotdog-eating contest, but lo and behold, our results suggest a compelling link.
The figure (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of this chuckle-worthy discovery. The scatterplot showcases the undeniable connection between air pollution levels in Ponca City and the subsequent hotdog consumption by the competition champions. It's as clear as day, much like the streaks of mustard on the chin of an enthusiastic hotdog enthusiast!
Our data analysis goes to show that while there may not be a direct causation (we're not suggesting that breathing in polluted air suddenly turns you into a hotdog-eating champion), the statistical relationship between these variables is not something to be taken lightly. We're not saying that the fumes from Ponca City are the secret ingredient to competitive eating success, but it's certainly a tantalizing avenue for further investigation.
In conclusion, our findings not only raise eyebrows and prompt a good-natured chuckle but also pose thought-provoking questions about the impact of local environmental factors on the appetites and competitive eating performances of our esteemed hotdog connoisseurs. While the pursuit of scientific knowledge often involves serious inquiry, it's moments like these that remind us to relish the unexpected and savor the statistical humor that can be uncovered in the unlikeliest of places.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our investigation into the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the hotdog consumption habits of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions unveils a statistical revelation that is as tantalizing as a chili and cheese-topped frankfurter – pun intended!
As we humorously juggle the variables of environmental quality and competitive eating finesse, our findings align with the prior scholarly jests. Smith et al.'s (2020) emphasis on the pervasive impact of air pollution gains a humorous twist as we consider the aromatic influence of Ponca City's air on the gustatory performances of hotdog conquerors. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) take on a comedic hue as our results support their insight into the gastronomic prowess of competitive eaters under the whimsical influence of local environmental factors.
To enliven the discussion, let's relish the statistical sandwich we've uncovered. Our robust correlation coefficient and p-value lower than a low-fat soy hotdog bun serve as compelling evidence of the unlikely but statistically significant relationship between Ponca City's air pollution and the subsequent hotdog consumption by champions. This statistical bond is as unexpected as finding an unopened ketchup bottle at a hotdog eating contest.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) not only visually illustrates this comically unexpected relationship but also serves as a reminder that statistical inquiry can be as playful as a hotdog vendor's patter. As we uncover this statisticial sorcery, we're reminded of the importance of approaching research with humor and a willingness to embrace unexpected findings. Our results suggest that while breathing Ponca City's air may not lead to a sudden surge in competitive eating skills, there is a tantalizing statistical connection that merits further exploration.
In the spirit of our lighthearted investigation, we're left pondering the age-old question: "Which came first, the air pollution or the hotdog champion?" Our findings raise questions that tickle the scientific funny bone and warrant continued research into the curious interplay between local environmental factors and competitive eating prowess.
In conclusion, our study serves as a delectable reminder that statistics, like a well-dressed hotdog, can be both serious and delightfully whimsical. This pun-laden pursuit of scientific inquiry serves as a reminder to embrace the unexpected findings and savor the statistical humor that can sizzle in the unlikeliest of statistical linkages.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we analyzed air quality indicators in Ponca City and the annual hotdog consumption by the competition champions from 1989 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results not only provoke humor but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis is often seen as a dry and humorless endeavor, a place where numbers reign supreme and laughter takes a backseat. However, in the realm of research, every now and then, we stumble upon correlations that leave us scratching our heads and chuckling to ourselves. In line with this, our study ventures into the unexpected and explores the quirky relationship between air pollution levels in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astonishing hotdog consumption by the illustrious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
It is said that "brevity is the soul of wit," and in the spirit of this truism, we are about to embark on a journey that will unravel the mysteries of these seemingly unrelated variables. As we take a bite out of this peculiar conundrum, we hope to serve up some statistical humor, a dash of science, and a side of pun-laden data analysis. After all, when it comes to unraveling unusual correlations, one must relish the opportunity to delve into the unexpected intersections of variables.
On one hand, we have the ethereal gusts of air pollution wafting through the charming city of Ponca, and on the other, we have the awe-inspiring feats of hotdog consumption by the champions of competitive eating. Though it may sound like the setup to a convoluted joke, the statistical rigor and analytical prowess applied in this study uncover a fascinating relationship that is no laughing matter. Well, okay, it is definitely a laughing matter, but it's backed by empirical evidence!
Before delving into the "meaty" details of this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the spiciness of the research landscape we are venturing into. Stay tuned as we embark on a tryst with statistics, intertwined with the unexpected humor of uncovering correlations that defy conventional wisdom and prompt a good-natured chuckle. Join us as we unravel the mystery of whether air pollution in Ponca City serves as a catalyst for champions to "ketchup" on their hotdog consumption prowess!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data from 1989 to 2022 unveiled a surprising discovery in the realm of statistical tomfoolery. We found a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913, r-squared of 0.5541184, and p < 0.01 between air pollution levels in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the astonishing hotdog consumption by the illustrious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In the world of statistics, discovering a relationship between seemingly unrelated variables can be as rare as finding a vegan at a hotdog-eating contest, but lo and behold, our results suggest a compelling link.
The figure (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of this chuckle-worthy discovery. The scatterplot showcases the undeniable connection between air pollution levels in Ponca City and the subsequent hotdog consumption by the competition champions. It's as clear as day, much like the streaks of mustard on the chin of an enthusiastic hotdog enthusiast!
Our data analysis goes to show that while there may not be a direct causation (we're not suggesting that breathing in polluted air suddenly turns you into a hotdog-eating champion), the statistical relationship between these variables is not something to be taken lightly. We're not saying that the fumes from Ponca City are the secret ingredient to competitive eating success, but it's certainly a tantalizing avenue for further investigation.
In conclusion, our findings not only raise eyebrows and prompt a good-natured chuckle but also pose thought-provoking questions about the impact of local environmental factors on the appetites and competitive eating performances of our esteemed hotdog connoisseurs. While the pursuit of scientific knowledge often involves serious inquiry, it's moments like these that remind us to relish the unexpected and savor the statistical humor that can be uncovered in the unlikeliest of places.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In the grand scheme of research, our study reveals a correlation that is more relish than ketchup! The undeniable statistical link between air pollution in Ponca City and the astonishing hotdog consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champions is as surprising as finding a veggie dog at a chili dog festival. Our findings not only provoke a good-natured chuckle but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess. While we can't claim that breathing in polluted air suddenly turns you into a hotdog-eating champion, our results suggest a compelling statistical relationship. It's as clear as day, much like the streaks of mustard on the chin of an enthusiastic hotdog enthusiast! However, we're not suggesting that the fumes from Ponca City are the secret ingredient to competitive eating success. Nonetheless, the statistical relationship between these variables is not something to be taken lightly, much like the weight of a loaded bratwurst.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry and delicious statistical discoveries, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. After all, sometimes in the research world, the most unexpected findings can be the most tantalizing. It is crucial to acknowledge the spiciness of the research landscape we have ventured into. So let us savor this statistical humor and relish the uncovering of correlations that defy conventional wisdom in the most unexpected places.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Gastronomical Environmental Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Gastronomic Environmental Research (IGER)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion with an abstract of This study delves into the curious connection between air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and the consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, we analyzed air quality indicators in Ponca City and the annual hotdog consumption by the competition champions from 1989 to 2022. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7443913 and p < 0.01, suggesting a compelling statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The results not only provoke humor but also raise intriguing questions about the influence of local environmental factors on competitive eating prowess.
ChatGPT:
Bun Intended, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, air pollution, hotdog consumption, Ponca City, Oklahoma, environmental protection agency data, correlation coefficient, competitive eating prowess, statistical relationship
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Ponca City, OklahomaDetailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Ponca City, OK
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.5541184 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma) over the 34 years from 1989 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.5E-7. 0.0000004486653750564177000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.74 in 4.5E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,228,833 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 33 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 33 because we have two variables measured over a period of 34 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.54, 0.86 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma (Bad air quality days) | 0.0223464 | 0.0462963 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.210526 | 0.374317 | 0.369863 | 0.279452 | 0.4 | 0.29235 | 0.356164 | 0.369863 | 0.245179 | 0.236769 | 0.509642 | 0.277473 | 0.368421 | 0.480769 | 0.4 | 0.493151 | 0.309392 | 0.301939 | 0.350685 | 0.243836 | 0.2 | 0.273224 | 0.333333 | 0.141274 |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten) | 15.5 | 16 | 21.5 | 19 | 17 | 20 | 19.5 | 22.25 | 24.5 | 19 | 20.25 | 25 | 50 | 50.5 | 44.5 | 53.33 | 49 | 53.75 | 66 | 59 | 68 | 54 | 62 | 68 | 69 | 61 | 62 | 70 | 72 | 74 | 71 | 75 | 76 | 63 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0223464,0.0462963,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.210526,0.374317,0.369863,0.279452,0.4,0.29235,0.356164,0.369863,0.245179,0.236769,0.509642,0.277473,0.368421,0.480769,0.4,0.493151,0.309392,0.301939,0.350685,0.243836,0.2,0.273224,0.333333,0.141274,])
array_2 = np.array([15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,63,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma
- Line chart for only Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Bun Intended: The Link Between Air Pollution in Ponca City, Oklahoma and Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!
Correlation ID: 2501 · Black Variable ID: 22115 · Red Variable ID: 500