about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,486 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Johnathan and the second variable is Arson in Iowa.  The chart goes from 2001 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer Johnathans meant fewer people to accidentally leave the stove on while making their famous Midwestern hot dish.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that resembles a Polaroid photo of a tranquil, leafy small town in Iowa. The scene should capture the nostalgic charm of the neighborhood, with a subtle focus on the diminishing presence of the name "Johnathan." The visual should evoke a sense of dwindling occurrences of arson, portraying a peaceful setting where the once prominent "Johnathans" in the neighborhood have seemingly contributed to the decline in fiery incidents. The image should reflect the fading popularity of the name while exuding a serene ambiance, symbolizing the calming effect it has had on the community. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Celtic art Steampunk a Polaroid photo Art nouveau
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa, in the following situation: As the name "Johnathan" fell out of favor, there was a corresponding decrease in the creation of "hot" Johnathans, leading to a lower "ignition" rate for fires in Iowa. It seems the "heat" around the name was doused, preventing a potential "burning" desire to commit arson. This unexpected correlation suggests that the popularity of a name can have a "fiery" impact on the behavior of individuals in a particular geographic area. So, it seems that the name Johnathan was really "fanning the flames" of arson in Iowa!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Iowa, the name "Johnathan" slowly lost its popularity over the years. At the same time, the number of arson incidents decreased. In a quiet, leafy neighborhood, fewer Johnathans played in the streets, and there were less fiery incidents around, as if the name itself had been dousing the flames of arson.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Iowa, the name "Johnathan" slowly lost its popularity over the years. At the same time, the number of arson incidents decreased. In a quiet, leafy neighborhood, fewer Johnathans played in the streets, and there were less fiery incidents around, as if the name itself had been dousing the flames of arson. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that resembles a Polaroid photo of a tranquil, leafy small town in Iowa. The scene should capture the nostalgic charm of the neighborhood, with a subtle focus on the diminishing presence of the name "Johnathan." The visual should evoke a sense of dwindling occurrences of arson, portraying a peaceful setting where the once prominent "Johnathans" in the neighborhood have seemingly contributed to the decline in fiery incidents. The image should reflect the fading popularity of the name while exuding a serene ambiance, symbolizing the calming effect it has had on the community.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Johnathan caused Arson in Iowa to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa

The Journal of Pyromania Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to explore the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in the state of Iowa. Armed with data derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team delved into this burning question, uncovering some unexpected and, dare I say, fiery findings.

Taking a statistical approach, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. The association between the prevalence of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson was undeniably striking, igniting sparks of curiosity in our investigation.

One may jest about the fire “Johnathan” with this trend, but our findings suggest a rather scorching connection that warrants further investigation. Amidst the crackling embers of data, the flame of correlation persists, beckoning us to ponder the intriguing implications of this incendiary association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to explore the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in the state of Iowa. Armed with data derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team delved into this burning question, uncovering some unexpected and, dare I say, fiery findings.

Taking a statistical approach, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. The association between the prevalence of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson was undeniably striking, igniting sparks of curiosity in our investigation.

One may jest about the fire “Johnathan” with this trend, but our findings suggest a rather scorching connection that warrants further investigation. Amidst the crackling embers of data, the flame of correlation persists, beckoning us to ponder the intriguing implications of this incendiary association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between names and human behavior has long piqued the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. Whether it be the influence of names on career success, social interactions, or even criminal tendencies, the impact of nomenclature is a topic that continues to blaze a trail in the realm of sociological inquiry.

Here we have a smoldering case of a rather unconventional name, 'Johnathan', and its potential connection to the occurrence of arson in the state of Iowa. As the flames of curiosity licked at our heels, we embarked on a scorching journey into the world of data analytics to ascertain if there truly exists a fiery link between the popularity of 'Johnathan' and the prevalence of arson incidents. One might say this study is a real "fire-starter," but we assure you, dear reader, that we approached the task with the utmost seriousness, albeit with a hint of playful pyrotechnics.

Employing a robust statistical framework, we meticulously analyzed a trove of data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Our investigation uncovered a furnace-hot correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 and a blistering p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. These scalding statistics illuminated a stark and startling relationship between the ubiquity of the name 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson in the Hawkeye State.

Now that we've kindled your interest, it's worth emphasizing that our research does not seek to cast aspersions on those bearing the name 'Johnathan'. Rather, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional association and fuel discussions regarding the underlying factors at play. Yes, we may be playing with fire, but in the pursuit of scientific inquiry, a little spark of curiosity can be an illuminating force.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delve into the scorching details of our findings, stoking the flames of academic discourse and, hopefully, igniting new avenues of research in this sizzling frontier. So sit back, keep your fire extinguisher close at hand, and let's unravel the combustible mystery of 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to explore the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in the state of Iowa. Armed with data derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team delved into this burning question, uncovering some unexpected and, dare I say, fiery findings.

Taking a statistical approach, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. The association between the prevalence of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson was undeniably striking, igniting sparks of curiosity in our investigation.

One may jest about the fire “Johnathan” with this trend, but our findings suggest a rather scorching connection that warrants further investigation. Amidst the crackling embers of data, the flame of correlation persists, beckoning us to ponder the intriguing implications of this incendiary association.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between names and human behavior has long piqued the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. Whether it be the influence of names on career success, social interactions, or even criminal tendencies, the impact of nomenclature is a topic that continues to blaze a trail in the realm of sociological inquiry.
Here we have a smoldering case of a rather unconventional name, 'Johnathan', and its potential connection to the occurrence of arson in the state of Iowa. As the flames of curiosity licked at our heels, we embarked on a scorching journey into the world of data analytics to ascertain if there truly exists a fiery link between the popularity of 'Johnathan' and the prevalence of arson incidents. One might say this study is a real "fire-starter," but we assure you, dear reader, that we approached the task with the utmost seriousness, albeit with a hint of playful pyrotechnics.
Employing a robust statistical framework, we meticulously analyzed a trove of data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Our investigation uncovered a furnace-hot correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 and a blistering p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. These scalding statistics illuminated a stark and startling relationship between the ubiquity of the name 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson in the Hawkeye State.
Now that we've kindled your interest, it's worth emphasizing that our research does not seek to cast aspersions on those bearing the name 'Johnathan'. Rather, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional association and fuel discussions regarding the underlying factors at play. Yes, we may be playing with fire, but in the pursuit of scientific inquiry, a little spark of curiosity can be an illuminating force.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delve into the scorching details of our findings, stoking the flames of academic discourse and, hopefully, igniting new avenues of research in this sizzling frontier. So sit back, keep your fire extinguisher close at hand, and let's unravel the combustible mystery of 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of nomenclature and its potential influence on human behavior is not a novel pursuit. Researchers have long ignited intellectual fires by investigating the impact of names on various aspects of life. Smith et al. (2010) and Doe (2015) have delved into the intricate relationship between nomenclature and societal phenomena, shedding light on the blazing conundrum of how names may shape individual experiences and interactions. As we embark on our own incendiary investigation, we find ourselves in good company with these flame-wielding scholars.

In "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri, the author explores the significance of names in shaping identity, underscoring the embers of curiosity that have long burned in the field of sociolinguistics. Similarly, "Fahrenheit 451" by Ray Bradbury kindles the inferno of inquiry into the power of language and symbolism, providing a metaphorical spark for our own examination of the incendiary connection between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa.

Turning to more non-fiction works, "The Name Therapist" by Duana Taha offers an illuminating exploration of the significance of names in the modern world, igniting flames of contemplation about the often-overlooked influence of nomenclature. Continuing our literary foray, "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" by J.K. Rowling may seem like an unexpected addition, but the intense and fiery trials faced by the characters provide a metaphor for the scorching investigation we are undertaking.

In conducting this research, we also took a novel approach by perusing a unique selection of sources, including but not limited to grocery store receipts, restaurant menus, and even the occasional fortune cookie message. While some may question the scholarly merit of such unconventional resources, we argue that even the most unexpected kindling can spark the flames of insight in the pursuit of knowledge.

As we wade deeper into the smoldering embers of scholarly inquiry, our findings unveil an unexpectedly warm reception of the name 'Johnathan' in relation to arson in Iowa. The evidence, while toasty, beckons for further exploration and playful pyrotechnics in understanding this fiery phenomenon.

And now, here's a fire-related dad joke to keep the flames of curiosity burning bright: According to our research, the correlation between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa is so hot, it's practically "arsoff the charts"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2001 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to explore the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in the state of Iowa. Armed with data derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team delved into this burning question, uncovering some unexpected and, dare I say, fiery findings.

Taking a statistical approach, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. The association between the prevalence of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson was undeniably striking, igniting sparks of curiosity in our investigation.

One may jest about the fire “Johnathan” with this trend, but our findings suggest a rather scorching connection that warrants further investigation. Amidst the crackling embers of data, the flame of correlation persists, beckoning us to ponder the intriguing implications of this incendiary association.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between names and human behavior has long piqued the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. Whether it be the influence of names on career success, social interactions, or even criminal tendencies, the impact of nomenclature is a topic that continues to blaze a trail in the realm of sociological inquiry.
Here we have a smoldering case of a rather unconventional name, 'Johnathan', and its potential connection to the occurrence of arson in the state of Iowa. As the flames of curiosity licked at our heels, we embarked on a scorching journey into the world of data analytics to ascertain if there truly exists a fiery link between the popularity of 'Johnathan' and the prevalence of arson incidents. One might say this study is a real "fire-starter," but we assure you, dear reader, that we approached the task with the utmost seriousness, albeit with a hint of playful pyrotechnics.
Employing a robust statistical framework, we meticulously analyzed a trove of data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Our investigation uncovered a furnace-hot correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 and a blistering p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. These scalding statistics illuminated a stark and startling relationship between the ubiquity of the name 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson in the Hawkeye State.
Now that we've kindled your interest, it's worth emphasizing that our research does not seek to cast aspersions on those bearing the name 'Johnathan'. Rather, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional association and fuel discussions regarding the underlying factors at play. Yes, we may be playing with fire, but in the pursuit of scientific inquiry, a little spark of curiosity can be an illuminating force.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delve into the scorching details of our findings, stoking the flames of academic discourse and, hopefully, igniting new avenues of research in this sizzling frontier. So sit back, keep your fire extinguisher close at hand, and let's unravel the combustible mystery of 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To elucidate the potential correlation between the prominence of the name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in Iowa, our research team embarked on a rigorous exploration guided by data-driven methodologies, and yes, a flair for the dramatic. Our data collection process began by harnessing the robust repositories of the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, ensuring that our analysis encapsulated the sizzling span of years from 2001 to 2022.

Our first step involved a comprehensive extraction of the frequency and distribution of the first name 'Johnathan' across different periods within the designated timeframe. We navigated through the sea of data, dodging any potential spurious correlations that might have disguised themselves as fiery insights. Our team was ever-vigilant for any statistical smokescreens that might have clouded our vision, but it seems we escaped unscathed, so no need to call the fire brigade just yet!

In parallel, we painstakingly compiled and tabulated the occurrences of arson incidents within Iowa during the same fiery epoch. This involved a meticulous process of cross-referencing official records and validating the reported cases to ensure the purity of our dataset. You could say we were quite the ardent arson aficionados, although no match was struck in the process.

Once our data containers were brimming with the requisite information, we stoked the flames of statistical analysis to unearth the scorching relationship between the name 'Johnathan' and the occurrence of arson in the Hawkeye State. A series of infernal statistical techniques, including but not limited to regression analysis and spatial modeling, were deployed with precision and a touch of flair, resulting in the emergence of a correlation coefficient that could double as a radiant torch in the darkest statistical alleys.

Additionally, to ensure the temperance and reliability of our findings, we employed a series of sensitivity analyses and robustness checks. After all, the last thing we wanted was for our conclusions to go up in smoke due to statistical anomalies or methodological oversights. Rest assured, we kept a firm grip on the fire hose of scientific rigor throughout our infernal quest for truth and insight.

In summary, our methodology employed a fusion of meticulous data mining, devilish statistical analyses, and a smattering of data validation techniques, all with the overarching goal of illuminating the incendiary connection between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa. Our approach, while undeniably ambitious, was executed with the precision of a pyromaniac with a passion for precision, paving the way for the incandescent findings that we shall forthwith unveil.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2001 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9608819, r-squared of 0.9232940, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to explore the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in the state of Iowa. Armed with data derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team delved into this burning question, uncovering some unexpected and, dare I say, fiery findings.

Taking a statistical approach, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. The association between the prevalence of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson was undeniably striking, igniting sparks of curiosity in our investigation.

One may jest about the fire “Johnathan” with this trend, but our findings suggest a rather scorching connection that warrants further investigation. Amidst the crackling embers of data, the flame of correlation persists, beckoning us to ponder the intriguing implications of this incendiary association.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between names and human behavior has long piqued the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. Whether it be the influence of names on career success, social interactions, or even criminal tendencies, the impact of nomenclature is a topic that continues to blaze a trail in the realm of sociological inquiry.
Here we have a smoldering case of a rather unconventional name, 'Johnathan', and its potential connection to the occurrence of arson in the state of Iowa. As the flames of curiosity licked at our heels, we embarked on a scorching journey into the world of data analytics to ascertain if there truly exists a fiery link between the popularity of 'Johnathan' and the prevalence of arson incidents. One might say this study is a real "fire-starter," but we assure you, dear reader, that we approached the task with the utmost seriousness, albeit with a hint of playful pyrotechnics.
Employing a robust statistical framework, we meticulously analyzed a trove of data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Our investigation uncovered a furnace-hot correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 and a blistering p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. These scalding statistics illuminated a stark and startling relationship between the ubiquity of the name 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson in the Hawkeye State.
Now that we've kindled your interest, it's worth emphasizing that our research does not seek to cast aspersions on those bearing the name 'Johnathan'. Rather, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional association and fuel discussions regarding the underlying factors at play. Yes, we may be playing with fire, but in the pursuit of scientific inquiry, a little spark of curiosity can be an illuminating force.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delve into the scorching details of our findings, stoking the flames of academic discourse and, hopefully, igniting new avenues of research in this sizzling frontier. So sit back, keep your fire extinguisher close at hand, and let's unravel the combustible mystery of 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The scorching investigation into the correlation between the prominence of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in Iowa yielded an astoundingly hot correlation coefficient of 0.9608819, with an r-squared value of 0.9232940 and a p-value of less than 0.01, across the period from 2001 to 2022. These blazing statistics illuminated a glaring relationship between the frequency of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the occurrence of arson, leaving no doubt about the fervent association uncovered in our study.

Fig. 1 depicts a scintillating scatterplot, visually depicting the clear connection between the popularity of the name 'Johnathan' and the incidents of arson in Iowa. The scorching trend line undeniably portrays the searing correlation that fueled our investigation.

No need for alarm, but it seems 'Johnathan' may be setting more than just hearts on fire.

Our findings indicate a compelling and robust relationship between the prevalence of the name 'Johnathan' and the occurrence of arson in Iowa. While this association may seem to spark some lighthearted jests, the implications of our research beckon a deeper exploration into the underlying factors at play, igniting flames of academic curiosity in this incendiary realm of inquiry.

It seems 'Johnathan' is truly a hot name in more ways than one.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to explore the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in the state of Iowa. Armed with data derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team delved into this burning question, uncovering some unexpected and, dare I say, fiery findings.

Taking a statistical approach, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. The association between the prevalence of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson was undeniably striking, igniting sparks of curiosity in our investigation.

One may jest about the fire “Johnathan” with this trend, but our findings suggest a rather scorching connection that warrants further investigation. Amidst the crackling embers of data, the flame of correlation persists, beckoning us to ponder the intriguing implications of this incendiary association.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of nomenclature and its potential influence on human behavior is not a novel pursuit. Researchers have long ignited intellectual fires by investigating the impact of names on various aspects of life. Smith et al. (2010) and Doe (2015) have delved into the intricate relationship between nomenclature and societal phenomena, shedding light on the blazing conundrum of how names may shape individual experiences and interactions. As we embark on our own incendiary investigation, we find ourselves in good company with these flame-wielding scholars.
In "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri, the author explores the significance of names in shaping identity, underscoring the embers of curiosity that have long burned in the field of sociolinguistics. Similarly, "Fahrenheit 451" by Ray Bradbury kindles the inferno of inquiry into the power of language and symbolism, providing a metaphorical spark for our own examination of the incendiary connection between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa.
Turning to more non-fiction works, "The Name Therapist" by Duana Taha offers an illuminating exploration of the significance of names in the modern world, igniting flames of contemplation about the often-overlooked influence of nomenclature. Continuing our literary foray, "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" by J.K. Rowling may seem like an unexpected addition, but the intense and fiery trials faced by the characters provide a metaphor for the scorching investigation we are undertaking.
In conducting this research, we also took a novel approach by perusing a unique selection of sources, including but not limited to grocery store receipts, restaurant menus, and even the occasional fortune cookie message. While some may question the scholarly merit of such unconventional resources, we argue that even the most unexpected kindling can spark the flames of insight in the pursuit of knowledge.
As we wade deeper into the smoldering embers of scholarly inquiry, our findings unveil an unexpectedly warm reception of the name 'Johnathan' in relation to arson in Iowa. The evidence, while toasty, beckons for further exploration and playful pyrotechnics in understanding this fiery phenomenon.
And now, here's a fire-related dad joke to keep the flames of curiosity burning bright: According to our research, the correlation between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa is so hot, it's practically "arsoff the charts"!

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching investigation into the correlation between the prominence of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in Iowa yielded an astoundingly hot correlation coefficient of 0.9608819, with an r-squared value of 0.9232940 and a p-value of less than 0.01, across the period from 2001 to 2022. These blazing statistics illuminated a glaring relationship between the frequency of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the occurrence of arson, leaving no doubt about the fervent association uncovered in our study.
Fig. 1 depicts a scintillating scatterplot, visually depicting the clear connection between the popularity of the name 'Johnathan' and the incidents of arson in Iowa. The scorching trend line undeniably portrays the searing correlation that fueled our investigation.
No need for alarm, but it seems 'Johnathan' may be setting more than just hearts on fire.
Our findings indicate a compelling and robust relationship between the prevalence of the name 'Johnathan' and the occurrence of arson in Iowa. While this association may seem to spark some lighthearted jests, the implications of our research beckon a deeper exploration into the underlying factors at play, igniting flames of academic curiosity in this incendiary realm of inquiry.
It seems 'Johnathan' is truly a hot name in more ways than one.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The blistering results of our study support the prior research that has kindled the flickering flames of curiosity regarding the influence of names on human behavior. Our investigation, like a well-built bonfire, stokes the inferno of inquiry with compelling evidence of the scorching connection between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa.

Initially, one might have dismissed the notion of a correlation between a name and criminal activities as nothing more than a play on words. However, our findings have ignited a firestorm of discussion, highlighting the significant association uncovered in our incendiary investigation. It seems that there’s more to the saying “playing with fire” than meets the eye.

The sizzling results of this study breathe new life into the flames of scholarly inquiry, providing empirical support for the burning hunch that nomenclature may indeed play a role in shaping behavior. As our findings incandescently demonstrate, the heat of correlation between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa is not just a flash in the pan—it's an enduring and compelling phenomenon.

Our research has reignited a longstanding debate about the latent influence of names on individual actions and societal trends. Despite any initial skepticism, it is clear that the sparks of correlation between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa carry significant weight and merit further investigation. As the flames of our data continue to crackle, the implications of this incendiary connection cannot be extinguished facilely.

In the words of our favorite fire-inspired dad joke, the correlation is so hot, it's practically "arsoff the charts"! And indeed, our scorching findings stand as a testament to the unexpected and blazing implications of the name 'Johnathan' in relation to arson in Iowa.

As our research blazes a trail through the smoldering embers of nomenclature and behavior, it is clear that the flames of understanding are far from extinguished. The incendiary nature of our findings holds significant implications for the study of names and their potential impacts, casting a radiant light on the need for further exploration in this fiery realm of inquiry.

It appears that the name ‘Johnathan’ truly ignites more than just casual interest—it fans the flames of thorough examination. And after all, in the blazing pursuit of knowledge, it pays to keep an open mind to unexpected sources of kindling.

In the scorching pursuit of truth, our findings reveal the heat to the hypothesis of the connection between the name 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa. It seems that, as the saying goes, there's no smoke without fire—except in this case, the smoke signals a deeper understanding of the combustible influence of nomenclature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Johnathan and Arson in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to explore the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in the state of Iowa. Armed with data derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team delved into this burning question, uncovering some unexpected and, dare I say, fiery findings.

Taking a statistical approach, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. The association between the prevalence of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson was undeniably striking, igniting sparks of curiosity in our investigation.

One may jest about the fire “Johnathan” with this trend, but our findings suggest a rather scorching connection that warrants further investigation. Amidst the crackling embers of data, the flame of correlation persists, beckoning us to ponder the intriguing implications of this incendiary association.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between names and human behavior has long piqued the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. Whether it be the influence of names on career success, social interactions, or even criminal tendencies, the impact of nomenclature is a topic that continues to blaze a trail in the realm of sociological inquiry.
Here we have a smoldering case of a rather unconventional name, 'Johnathan', and its potential connection to the occurrence of arson in the state of Iowa. As the flames of curiosity licked at our heels, we embarked on a scorching journey into the world of data analytics to ascertain if there truly exists a fiery link between the popularity of 'Johnathan' and the prevalence of arson incidents. One might say this study is a real "fire-starter," but we assure you, dear reader, that we approached the task with the utmost seriousness, albeit with a hint of playful pyrotechnics.
Employing a robust statistical framework, we meticulously analyzed a trove of data sourced from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. Our investigation uncovered a furnace-hot correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 and a blistering p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. These scalding statistics illuminated a stark and startling relationship between the ubiquity of the name 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson in the Hawkeye State.
Now that we've kindled your interest, it's worth emphasizing that our research does not seek to cast aspersions on those bearing the name 'Johnathan'. Rather, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional association and fuel discussions regarding the underlying factors at play. Yes, we may be playing with fire, but in the pursuit of scientific inquiry, a little spark of curiosity can be an illuminating force.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall delve into the scorching details of our findings, stoking the flames of academic discourse and, hopefully, igniting new avenues of research in this sizzling frontier. So sit back, keep your fire extinguisher close at hand, and let's unravel the combustible mystery of 'Johnathan' and arson in Iowa.

[[RESULTS]]
The scorching investigation into the correlation between the prominence of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in Iowa yielded an astoundingly hot correlation coefficient of 0.9608819, with an r-squared value of 0.9232940 and a p-value of less than 0.01, across the period from 2001 to 2022. These blazing statistics illuminated a glaring relationship between the frequency of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the occurrence of arson, leaving no doubt about the fervent association uncovered in our study.
Fig. 1 depicts a scintillating scatterplot, visually depicting the clear connection between the popularity of the name 'Johnathan' and the incidents of arson in Iowa. The scorching trend line undeniably portrays the searing correlation that fueled our investigation.
No need for alarm, but it seems 'Johnathan' may be setting more than just hearts on fire.
Our findings indicate a compelling and robust relationship between the prevalence of the name 'Johnathan' and the occurrence of arson in Iowa. While this association may seem to spark some lighthearted jests, the implications of our research beckon a deeper exploration into the underlying factors at play, igniting flames of academic curiosity in this incendiary realm of inquiry.
It seems 'Johnathan' is truly a hot name in more ways than one.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our scorching investigation into the simmering correlation between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in Iowa has illuminated a compelling connection. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9608819, with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaves little doubt about the fiery relationship uncovered in our study. It seems that 'Johnathan' may indeed be igniting more than just a spark of curiosity. One might say that this research has truly set the academic world ablaze, shedding light on the incendiary nature of nomenclature in unexpected ways.

As tempting as it may be to make a "lighting up the charts" pun, it's important to recognize the significance of these findings. The implications of our research extend beyond mere statistical novelty, kindling discussions about the interplay of societal factors and individual behavior. It's as if 'Johnathan' is leaving a scorching impression on the landscape of arson occurrences in Iowa, fueling our curiosity and stoking the flames of further inquiry.

With our findings in mind, we adamantly assert that no further research is required in this area. In the words of the esteemed firefighter philosopher, "Where there's smoke, there's fire, and where there's 'Johnathan,' there's a statistical inferno." It's time to extinguish any doubts and embrace the heat of our results, for we have truly unravelled the combustible mystery surrounding the enigmatic name 'Johnathan' and its fiery affiliation with arson in Iowa.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pyromania Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Behavioral Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Playing with Fire: The Incendiary Connection Between the Name 'Johnathan' and Arson in Iowa with an abstract of In this study, we set out to explore the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Johnathan' and incidents of arson in the state of Iowa. Armed with data derived from the U.S. Social Security Administration and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, our research team delved into this burning question, uncovering some unexpected and, dare I say, fiery findings.
Taking a statistical approach, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9608819 with a p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2001 to 2022. The association between the prevalence of the moniker 'Johnathan' and the incidence of arson was undeniably striking, igniting sparks of curiosity in our investigation.
One may jest about the fire “Johnathan” with this trend, but our findings suggest a rather scorching connection that warrants further investigation. Amidst the crackling embers of data, the flame of correlation persists, beckoning us to ponder the intriguing implications of this incendiary association.

ChatGPT:

Johnathan name, arson in Iowa, correlation coefficient, FBI crime statistics, U.S. Social Security Administration data, Johnathan name popularity, arson incidents, Iowa demographics, statistical analysis, correlation between name and crime

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Johnathan
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Johnathan
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Johnathan

Arson in Iowa
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Iowa
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Iowa

Correlation r = 0.9608819 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9232940 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Iowa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Johnathan) over the 22 years from 2001 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-12. 0.0000000000012882302916647405
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 1.3E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 776,258,722,117 random variables You don't actually need 776 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Johnathan (Babies born)2313226921962190225223072156196818411650149914101251119711601024944832810710697593
Arson in Iowa (Arson rate)20.821.820.821.520.123.921.320.118.715.916.91814.81314.11213.59.51113.310.47.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2313,2269,2196,2190,2252,2307,2156,1968,1841,1650,1499,1410,1251,1197,1160,1024,944,832,810,710,697,593,])
array_2 = np.array([20.8,21.8,20.8,21.5,20.1,23.9,21.3,20.1,18.7,15.9,16.9,18,14.8,13,14.1,12,13.5,9.5,11,13.3,10.4,7.9,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Johnathan"
array_2_name = "Arson in Iowa"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 2486 · Black Variable ID: 2232 · Red Variable ID: 20043
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0