about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,472 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and the second variable is Google searches for 'learn spanish'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn stalks were no longer ear-responsible for the spike in 'learn spanish' searches as people had to maize elsewhere for language inspiration. Without GMOs, Nebraskans couldn't plant the idea to 'stalk' up on Spanish knowledge, leading to a kernel of truth - the crop in language interest was all but husked! Remember, when it comes to GMOs and language learning, it's all about the Ears of the corn.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image in the style of parallax art showing a Nebraska cornfield setting. In the foreground, depict farmers planting genetically modified corn seeds. Nearby, show a group of people using a mobile phone to search for "learn Spanish" on Google. As the farmers plant the GMO corn, illustrate fewer stalks of corn and a decrease in the number of people telling corny jokes. Show the group's interest in learning Spanish waning, symbolized by the 'learn Spanish' search bar being covered in corn husks. The visual should depict the transition from an initially lively and humorous atmosphere to a more subdued and focused setting as the GMO corn is planted. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Art nouveau Sci-fi fantacy Cute 2D animation Parallax art
ChatGPT: Parallax art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish', in the following situation: As farmers shelled out more cash for non-GMO seeds, they couldn't afford to hire as many stalkers. With fewer stalkers in the fields, there was a decrease in corny jokes being told. This led to a reduction in the a-maize-ing puns that usually corn-tribute to a fun learning experience. As a result, people lost their ear for the language and husked that 'learn spanish' search bar. It's a real kernel of truth - when GMO use decreased, so did the desire to salsa with the Spanish language!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Nebraska cornfield, farmers are planting genetically modified corn seeds, while nearby, a group of people are searching for "learn Spanish" on Google. As the farmers plant the GMO corn, fewer stalkers are seen in the fields, resulting in a decrease in corny jokes being told. With the decrease in laughter, the group's interest in learning Spanish wanes, symbolized by the 'learn Spanish' search bar being covered in husks.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Parallax art ] and depicting this scene: In a Nebraska cornfield, farmers are planting genetically modified corn seeds, while nearby, a group of people are searching for "learn Spanish" on Google. As the farmers plant the GMO corn, fewer stalkers are seen in the fields, resulting in a decrease in corny jokes being told. With the decrease in laughter, the group's interest in learning Spanish wanes, symbolized by the 'learn Spanish' search bar being covered in husks. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image in the style of parallax art showing a Nebraska cornfield setting. In the foreground, depict farmers planting genetically modified corn seeds. Nearby, show a group of people using a mobile phone to search for "learn Spanish" on Google. As the farmers plant the GMO corn, illustrate fewer stalks of corn and a decrease in the number of people telling corny jokes. Show the group's interest in learning Spanish waning, symbolized by the 'learn Spanish' search bar being covered in corn husks. The visual should depict the transition from an initially lively and humorous atmosphere to a more subdued and focused setting as the GMO corn is planted.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska caused learn spanish (Google searches for 'learn spanish') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning

The Journal of Genetically Modified Language Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the surprising link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. Our team utilized data from the USDA and Google Trends to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a remarkably strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity may be closer than we think - perhaps they both have a kernel of truth to them! This unexpected finding prompts us to ponder: Is there a genetic modification that can make corn say "Hola" instead of "Kernel"? Our research not only sheds light on this curious correlation but also demonstrates the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. After all, we might just uncover more than we bargained for when we go digging in the husk of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the surprising link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. Our team utilized data from the USDA and Google Trends to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a remarkably strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity may be closer than we think - perhaps they both have a kernel of truth to them! This unexpected finding prompts us to ponder: Is there a genetic modification that can make corn say "Hola" instead of "Kernel"? Our research not only sheds light on this curious correlation but also demonstrates the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. After all, we might just uncover more than we bargained for when we go digging in the husk of data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Picture this: a farmer meticulously tending to rows of genetically modified corn in expansive Nebraska fields. Meanwhile, across the globe, someone fervently types "learn Spanish" into their Google search bar, eager to impress their friends with newfound language skills. What if I told you that these two seemingly unrelated events are actually linked? It sounds like a corny joke, doesn't it? But our research begs to differ.

The intersection of agriculture and language learning may seem as mismatched as ears of corn and foreign grammar, but our investigation into the connection between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and Google searches for "learn Spanish" has indeed yielded an intriguing correlation. It's almost as puzzling as trying to get a cornstalk to speak Spanish – talk about a real earful!

In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected relationships and patterns. Our study delves into this amusing yet thought-provoking correlation, aiming to unearth the kernels of truth behind the maize of data. Because as any seasoned researcher knows, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries can spring forth from the most unexpected places. Just like how the corn in Nebraska can sprout a conversation about Spanish language learning – it really does make one wonder if there's a joke hidden in the crop!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the surprising link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. Our team utilized data from the USDA and Google Trends to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a remarkably strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity may be closer than we think - perhaps they both have a kernel of truth to them! This unexpected finding prompts us to ponder: Is there a genetic modification that can make corn say "Hola" instead of "Kernel"? Our research not only sheds light on this curious correlation but also demonstrates the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. After all, we might just uncover more than we bargained for when we go digging in the husk of data.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Picture this: a farmer meticulously tending to rows of genetically modified corn in expansive Nebraska fields. Meanwhile, across the globe, someone fervently types "learn Spanish" into their Google search bar, eager to impress their friends with newfound language skills. What if I told you that these two seemingly unrelated events are actually linked? It sounds like a corny joke, doesn't it? But our research begs to differ.
The intersection of agriculture and language learning may seem as mismatched as ears of corn and foreign grammar, but our investigation into the connection between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and Google searches for "learn Spanish" has indeed yielded an intriguing correlation. It's almost as puzzling as trying to get a cornstalk to speak Spanish – talk about a real earful!
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected relationships and patterns. Our study delves into this amusing yet thought-provoking correlation, aiming to unearth the kernels of truth behind the maize of data. Because as any seasoned researcher knows, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries can spring forth from the most unexpected places. Just like how the corn in Nebraska can sprout a conversation about Spanish language learning – it really does make one wonder if there's a joke hidden in the crop!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous scholarly works have probed the intricacies of GMO cultivation and its broad-ranging implications for agriculture and society. Smith and Doe (2010) examined the environmental effects of GMO corn production, while Jones (2015) focused on its economic impacts. These studies offer valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of genetically modified crops, shedding light on the complex web of factors at play. It's almost as complex as conjugating irregular Spanish verbs - now, that's a real cornundrum!

In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Michael Pollan delves into the modern agricultural landscape, exploring the prevalence and repercussions of genetically modified organisms. With his characteristic blend of investigative journalism and wry humor, Pollan delves into the maize of ethical and environmental concerns surrounding GMOs, making readers ponder the implications of tinkering with nature's recipe. It's almost as puzzling as decoding the subtleties of the Spanish subjunctive – sometimes, the grammar seems to be as twisted as a corn maze!

Turning to the world of fiction, "The Corn Whisperer" by Stephanie Grace Whitson presents a whimsical tale of a farmer with a special knack for communicating with corn plants. As the protagonist unravels the mysteries of maize, readers are treated to a charming narrative that weaves together nature, magic, and the enduring bond between humans and crops. It's a-maize-ing how fiction can bring to life the wonders of agriculture – and who knows, maybe the corn in Nebraska is whispering "¡aprende español!" to passersby!

In the realm of film, "Napoleon Dynamite" offers a lighthearted portrayal of rural life and offbeat characters. While not directly related to GMO corn or Spanish language learning, the film's quirky charm and distinctive humor serve as a reminder that unexpected connections and moments of hilarity can arise in the most unlikely of settings – much like the surprising link we've uncovered between GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity. It's almost as unexpected as finding a cob of corn in a Spanish language classroom!

Overall, the literature surrounding GMO corn cultivation and its far-reaching implications provides a nuanced backdrop for our investigation into the correlation between GMO use in Nebraska and Google searches for "learn Spanish." As we delve into this unconventional linkage, we are reminded that even the most seemingly unrelated phenomena may hold kernels of connection waiting to be unearthed. After all, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries are hidden in the husk of unexpected correlations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the surprising link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. Our team utilized data from the USDA and Google Trends to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a remarkably strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity may be closer than we think - perhaps they both have a kernel of truth to them! This unexpected finding prompts us to ponder: Is there a genetic modification that can make corn say "Hola" instead of "Kernel"? Our research not only sheds light on this curious correlation but also demonstrates the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. After all, we might just uncover more than we bargained for when we go digging in the husk of data.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Picture this: a farmer meticulously tending to rows of genetically modified corn in expansive Nebraska fields. Meanwhile, across the globe, someone fervently types "learn Spanish" into their Google search bar, eager to impress their friends with newfound language skills. What if I told you that these two seemingly unrelated events are actually linked? It sounds like a corny joke, doesn't it? But our research begs to differ.
The intersection of agriculture and language learning may seem as mismatched as ears of corn and foreign grammar, but our investigation into the connection between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and Google searches for "learn Spanish" has indeed yielded an intriguing correlation. It's almost as puzzling as trying to get a cornstalk to speak Spanish – talk about a real earful!
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected relationships and patterns. Our study delves into this amusing yet thought-provoking correlation, aiming to unearth the kernels of truth behind the maize of data. Because as any seasoned researcher knows, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries can spring forth from the most unexpected places. Just like how the corn in Nebraska can sprout a conversation about Spanish language learning – it really does make one wonder if there's a joke hidden in the crop!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the tantalizing relationship between GMO corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish," our research team embarked on a journey through a maize of data, sifting through kernels of information to unveil the underlying correlation. We utilized data gathered from the USDA and Google Trends, mining through nearly two decades of information to identify patterns that would certainly be the corn-erstone of our study.

In the grand tradition of academic research, we initially formulated our hypothesis with a grain of skepticism, perhaps even a dash of corniness. However, armed with statistical tools and a kernel of curiosity, we set out to uncover the truth behind this unexpected association. After all, when it comes to research, we believe in shelling out the most compelling evidence – a punny proposition indeed.

The first step in our research process involved harvesting the necessary data from the USDA databases, probing into the details of GMO corn cultivation in the fertile lands of Nebraska. We aimed to not cobble together merely a snapshot, but rather a comprehensive timeline of the evolution of GMO corn usage, sowing the seeds of our study with meticulous attention to detail. This meant diving headfirst into a veritable field of statistics and agricultural reports, ensuring that we didn't overlook any crucial kernels of information.

Once the agricultural data was husked, it was time to turn our attention to the digital landscape - Google Trends. We combed through the cornucopia of "learn Spanish" search queries, examining the peaks and valleys of language curiosity over the years. Our approach was as thorough as the husking of an ear of corn, ensuring that we didn't miss any hidden kernels of insight lurking within the search trends.

Our next step was perhaps the most intricate – weaving together the threads of agricultural and digital data to create a comprehensive tapestry of information. We employed advanced statistical techniques, including correlation analysis and time-series modeling, to grasp the underlying connection between GMO corn usage and the frequency of "learn Spanish" searches. Like threading a needle through an unyielding corn husk, this process required finesse and patience but promised to unveil a pattern that was as clear as daylight.

After the statistical harvest, we were ready to reap the fruits of our labor and crunch the numbers. Our analysis yielded a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a truly astonishing link between GMO corn cultivation and Spanish language learning curiosity. This finding was as striking as finding a needle in a cornfield, affirming our suspicion that the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena was not just a kernel of truth, but a whole cornucopia!

In conclusion, our methodology was as thorough as checking every ear of corn in a field, ensuring that no cob was left unturned in our pursuit of understanding the curious alliance between GMO corn in Nebraska and the quest to "learn Spanish." Our research has not only bridged the seemingly disparate realms of agriculture and language learning but has also affirmed the notion that sometimes, the most fortuitous discoveries are the ones that pop up unexpectedly, much like an unexpected kernel in a bag of popcorn!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9662332, r-squared of 0.9336067, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the surprising link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. Our team utilized data from the USDA and Google Trends to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a remarkably strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity may be closer than we think - perhaps they both have a kernel of truth to them! This unexpected finding prompts us to ponder: Is there a genetic modification that can make corn say "Hola" instead of "Kernel"? Our research not only sheds light on this curious correlation but also demonstrates the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. After all, we might just uncover more than we bargained for when we go digging in the husk of data.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Picture this: a farmer meticulously tending to rows of genetically modified corn in expansive Nebraska fields. Meanwhile, across the globe, someone fervently types "learn Spanish" into their Google search bar, eager to impress their friends with newfound language skills. What if I told you that these two seemingly unrelated events are actually linked? It sounds like a corny joke, doesn't it? But our research begs to differ.
The intersection of agriculture and language learning may seem as mismatched as ears of corn and foreign grammar, but our investigation into the connection between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and Google searches for "learn Spanish" has indeed yielded an intriguing correlation. It's almost as puzzling as trying to get a cornstalk to speak Spanish – talk about a real earful!
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected relationships and patterns. Our study delves into this amusing yet thought-provoking correlation, aiming to unearth the kernels of truth behind the maize of data. Because as any seasoned researcher knows, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries can spring forth from the most unexpected places. Just like how the corn in Nebraska can sprout a conversation about Spanish language learning – it really does make one wonder if there's a joke hidden in the crop!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01) between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. This statistically significant finding suggests a robust association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, leaving us to wonder if there's a "cornnection" we've been overlooking all along!

Our research team also found an r-squared value of 0.9336067, indicating that over 93% of the variability in the frequency of "learn Spanish" searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production in Nebraska. Talk about a-maize-ing explanatory power! It seems that as Nebraska's cornfields grew, so did the interest in learning a new language. It's enough to make one exclaim, "Holy Guacamole!"

Furthermore, the scatterplot in Fig. 1 displays a clear and visually compelling relationship between the two variables. The data points form a tight cluster, affirming the strong positive correlation we observed. It's almost as convincing as a convincing piñata burst - a real bash of data, if you will!

This unexpected discovery not only highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends but also beckons us to question the potential underlying reasons for this unlikely correlation. Could it be that the cultivation of GMO corn has unwittingly inspired a wave of Spanish language curiosity, or is there a deeper kernel of truth waiting to be uncovered? Our findings certainly open the door to a-maize-ing possibilities and leave us contemplating the potential for growth in unexpected directions. After all, who knew that GMO corn could spark such a-corn-y affair with language learning? It's almost as surprising as finding a kernel of truth in a bushel of data!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the surprising link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. Our team utilized data from the USDA and Google Trends to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a remarkably strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity may be closer than we think - perhaps they both have a kernel of truth to them! This unexpected finding prompts us to ponder: Is there a genetic modification that can make corn say "Hola" instead of "Kernel"? Our research not only sheds light on this curious correlation but also demonstrates the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. After all, we might just uncover more than we bargained for when we go digging in the husk of data.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous scholarly works have probed the intricacies of GMO cultivation and its broad-ranging implications for agriculture and society. Smith and Doe (2010) examined the environmental effects of GMO corn production, while Jones (2015) focused on its economic impacts. These studies offer valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of genetically modified crops, shedding light on the complex web of factors at play. It's almost as complex as conjugating irregular Spanish verbs - now, that's a real cornundrum!
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Michael Pollan delves into the modern agricultural landscape, exploring the prevalence and repercussions of genetically modified organisms. With his characteristic blend of investigative journalism and wry humor, Pollan delves into the maize of ethical and environmental concerns surrounding GMOs, making readers ponder the implications of tinkering with nature's recipe. It's almost as puzzling as decoding the subtleties of the Spanish subjunctive – sometimes, the grammar seems to be as twisted as a corn maze!
Turning to the world of fiction, "The Corn Whisperer" by Stephanie Grace Whitson presents a whimsical tale of a farmer with a special knack for communicating with corn plants. As the protagonist unravels the mysteries of maize, readers are treated to a charming narrative that weaves together nature, magic, and the enduring bond between humans and crops. It's a-maize-ing how fiction can bring to life the wonders of agriculture – and who knows, maybe the corn in Nebraska is whispering "¡aprende español!" to passersby!
In the realm of film, "Napoleon Dynamite" offers a lighthearted portrayal of rural life and offbeat characters. While not directly related to GMO corn or Spanish language learning, the film's quirky charm and distinctive humor serve as a reminder that unexpected connections and moments of hilarity can arise in the most unlikely of settings – much like the surprising link we've uncovered between GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity. It's almost as unexpected as finding a cob of corn in a Spanish language classroom!
Overall, the literature surrounding GMO corn cultivation and its far-reaching implications provides a nuanced backdrop for our investigation into the correlation between GMO use in Nebraska and Google searches for "learn Spanish." As we delve into this unconventional linkage, we are reminded that even the most seemingly unrelated phenomena may hold kernels of connection waiting to be unearthed. After all, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries are hidden in the husk of unexpected correlations!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01) between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. This statistically significant finding suggests a robust association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, leaving us to wonder if there's a "cornnection" we've been overlooking all along!
Our research team also found an r-squared value of 0.9336067, indicating that over 93% of the variability in the frequency of "learn Spanish" searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production in Nebraska. Talk about a-maize-ing explanatory power! It seems that as Nebraska's cornfields grew, so did the interest in learning a new language. It's enough to make one exclaim, "Holy Guacamole!"
Furthermore, the scatterplot in Fig. 1 displays a clear and visually compelling relationship between the two variables. The data points form a tight cluster, affirming the strong positive correlation we observed. It's almost as convincing as a convincing piñata burst - a real bash of data, if you will!
This unexpected discovery not only highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends but also beckons us to question the potential underlying reasons for this unlikely correlation. Could it be that the cultivation of GMO corn has unwittingly inspired a wave of Spanish language curiosity, or is there a deeper kernel of truth waiting to be uncovered? Our findings certainly open the door to a-maize-ing possibilities and leave us contemplating the potential for growth in unexpected directions. After all, who knew that GMO corn could spark such a-corn-y affair with language learning? It's almost as surprising as finding a kernel of truth in a bushel of data!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have, quite literally, brought the phrase "¡Maíz Mío!" to life, uncovering an unexpected affinity between GMO corn production in Nebraska and the urge to "¡Aprender Español!" Our statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01) mirrors the robust association we discovered between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It's almost as if genetically modified corn fields are whispering "speak Spanish" to all who pass by – a-maize-ing, isn't it?

Our results support the prior research that delved into the complexities of GMO cultivation and its multifaceted influences. Smith and Doe's environmental effects of GMO corn production and Jones' focus on economic impacts now seem to have an additional layer of significance, much like the many layers of a Spanish tortilla. The unexpected "cornnection" we uncovered highlights the intricate web of factors at play, reminding us how crucial it is to consider the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. It's almost as complex as the irregular conjugation of Spanish verbs – a real "cornundrum," if you will!

Delving further into the "corny" literature review, Michael Pollan's explorations into ethical and environmental concerns surrounding GMOs now seem even more nuanced, akin to the intricacies of navigating the Spanish subjunctive. The whimsical tale of "The Corn Whisperer" takes on a whole new layer of metaphorical resonance. It's as if the protagonist is whispering "¡aprende español!" to the corn plants, beckoning readers to uncover the hidden connections between agriculture and language learning. Who knew that the world of fiction could hold kernels of truth about our research findings?

Our astonishingly high r-squared value of 0.9336067 underscores the a-maize-ing explanatory power of our model, offering a strong foothold for unraveling the underlying reasons behind this unlikely correlation. It seems that the cultivation of GMO corn in "The Cornhusker State" has unwittingly sown the seeds of linguistic curiosity, sprouting a newfound interest in Spanish language learning. It's as if the cornfields themselves are saying, "Ola! Soy Corn-ando," inspiring a wave of language exploration. Our findings beckon us to contemplate the potential for growth in unexpected directions, just like the unexpected sprouting of a "Spanish cornstalk" in the fertile Nebraska fields. It's almost as surprising as finding a kernel of truth in a bushel of data – and who knew that GMO corn could lead to a "corny" affair with language learning?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Google searches for 'learn spanish'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the surprising link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. Our team utilized data from the USDA and Google Trends to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a remarkably strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity may be closer than we think - perhaps they both have a kernel of truth to them! This unexpected finding prompts us to ponder: Is there a genetic modification that can make corn say "Hola" instead of "Kernel"? Our research not only sheds light on this curious correlation but also demonstrates the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. After all, we might just uncover more than we bargained for when we go digging in the husk of data.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Picture this: a farmer meticulously tending to rows of genetically modified corn in expansive Nebraska fields. Meanwhile, across the globe, someone fervently types "learn Spanish" into their Google search bar, eager to impress their friends with newfound language skills. What if I told you that these two seemingly unrelated events are actually linked? It sounds like a corny joke, doesn't it? But our research begs to differ.
The intersection of agriculture and language learning may seem as mismatched as ears of corn and foreign grammar, but our investigation into the connection between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and Google searches for "learn Spanish" has indeed yielded an intriguing correlation. It's almost as puzzling as trying to get a cornstalk to speak Spanish – talk about a real earful!
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected relationships and patterns. Our study delves into this amusing yet thought-provoking correlation, aiming to unearth the kernels of truth behind the maize of data. Because as any seasoned researcher knows, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries can spring forth from the most unexpected places. Just like how the corn in Nebraska can sprout a conversation about Spanish language learning – it really does make one wonder if there's a joke hidden in the crop!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01) between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. This statistically significant finding suggests a robust association between these seemingly disparate phenomena, leaving us to wonder if there's a "cornnection" we've been overlooking all along!
Our research team also found an r-squared value of 0.9336067, indicating that over 93% of the variability in the frequency of "learn Spanish" searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production in Nebraska. Talk about a-maize-ing explanatory power! It seems that as Nebraska's cornfields grew, so did the interest in learning a new language. It's enough to make one exclaim, "Holy Guacamole!"
Furthermore, the scatterplot in Fig. 1 displays a clear and visually compelling relationship between the two variables. The data points form a tight cluster, affirming the strong positive correlation we observed. It's almost as convincing as a convincing piñata burst - a real bash of data, if you will!
This unexpected discovery not only highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends but also beckons us to question the potential underlying reasons for this unlikely correlation. Could it be that the cultivation of GMO corn has unwittingly inspired a wave of Spanish language curiosity, or is there a deeper kernel of truth waiting to be uncovered? Our findings certainly open the door to a-maize-ing possibilities and leave us contemplating the potential for growth in unexpected directions. After all, who knew that GMO corn could spark such a-corn-y affair with language learning? It's almost as surprising as finding a kernel of truth in a bushel of data!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled the enigmatic connection between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish," establishing a substantial correlation and leaving us with a-maize-ing food for thought. This unexpected association has certainly ear-ned its place in the annals of intriguing research findings. It's almost as surprising as finding a corn husk at the center of a piñata - definitely not what you expected, but somehow fitting.

Our results not only highlight the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate trends but also invite a kernel of humor into the world of academic research. After all, who knew that GMO corn could double as a catalyst for linguistic curiosity? It's enough to make one exclaim, "GMO corn: bridging the gap between crop yields and conjugating verbs – talk about multitasking!"

As we tenderly put this corny chapter to rest, it is evident that further exploration of this quirky correlation may yield insights as delightful as stumbling upon a perfectly popped batch of popcorn. However, we assert with corn-fidence that no more research is needed in this area. As they say, we've already shucked the corn – and it's time to let this a-maize-ing discovery pop its kernel and kernel-go – that one's for the dad joke hall of fame!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Genetically Modified Language Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Agricultural Advancements and Linguistic Integration (IIAALI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maizey Habla Español: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Spanish Language Learning with an abstract of This paper examines the surprising link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Nebraska and the frequency of Google searches for "learn Spanish" from 2004 to 2023. Our team utilized data from the USDA and Google Trends to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9662332 (p < 0.01), indicating a remarkably strong association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that GMO corn and Spanish language curiosity may be closer than we think - perhaps they both have a kernel of truth to them! This unexpected finding prompts us to ponder: Is there a genetic modification that can make corn say "Hola" instead of "Kernel"? Our research not only sheds light on this curious correlation but also demonstrates the importance of considering the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated trends. After all, we might just uncover more than we bargained for when we go digging in the husk of data.

ChatGPT:

GMO, corn production, Nebraska, Google searches, learn Spanish, correlation coefficient, USDA data, Google Trends, genetic modification, language learning, interconnectedness of trends, corn and language associations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Nebraska that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska

Google searches for 'learn spanish'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'learn spanish' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'learn spanish'

Correlation r = 0.9662332 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9336067 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'learn spanish') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.8E-12. 0.0000000000047949161692513040
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 4.8E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 208,554,219,657 random variables You don't actually need 208 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska (GMO corn %)41393731272622151664433333232
Google searches for 'learn spanish' (Rel. search volume)85.2579.833373.583360.083352.583345.2538.166733.666729.416726.16672524.7523.916726.16672522.524.517.916721.083322.4




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([41,39,37,31,27,26,22,15,16,6,4,4,3,3,3,3,3,2,3,2,])
array_2 = np.array([85.25,79.8333,73.5833,60.0833,52.5833,45.25,38.1667,33.6667,29.4167,26.1667,25,24.75,23.9167,26.1667,25,22.5,24.5,17.9167,21.0833,22.4,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'learn spanish'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 2472 · Black Variable ID: 717 · Red Variable ID: 1407
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0