about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,462 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Detroit and the second variable is Physical album shipment volume in the United States.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Detroit decreased, it led to a shortage of smog-colored vinyl for pressing physical albums, causing a decline in shipment volume. Remember, when it comes to music, sometimes it's all about that haze!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, showing a clean and clear Detroit skyline with rows of vinyl records sitting on a production line, looking wistfully at the smog-free sky. The records choose to stay put, content to spin on turntables, basking in memories of their smog-coated past, as the shipment crates of albums are noticeably lacking. The scene is filled with longing and nostalgia, capturing the emotional journey of the vinyl records. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Voxel art Low poly Macabre Scalar art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States, in the following situation: As the air became cleaner, vinyl records began to feel less nostalgic for the smog-filled days of yore, leading to a collective lack of motivation to leave the pressing plants. This resulted in a noticeable decrease in physical album shipments across the country. Instead, the records decided to just spin on turntables in Detroit, reminiscing about the good old days when they were coated in a fine layer of industrial grime.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a clean and clear Detroit skyline, rows of vinyl records sit on a production line, looking wistfully at the city's now-smog-free sky. The shipment crates of albums, usually ready for distribution, are noticeably lacking as the records opt to stay put, content to spin on turntables, basking in memories of their smog-coated past.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a clean and clear Detroit skyline, rows of vinyl records sit on a production line, looking wistfully at the city's now-smog-free sky. The shipment crates of albums, usually ready for distribution, are noticeably lacking as the records opt to stay put, content to spin on turntables, basking in memories of their smog-coated past. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, showing a clean and clear Detroit skyline with rows of vinyl records sitting on a production line, looking wistfully at the smog-free sky. The records choose to stay put, content to spin on turntables, basking in memories of their smog-coated past, as the shipment crates of albums are noticeably lacking. The scene is filled with longing and nostalgia, capturing the emotional journey of the vinyl records.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Detroit caused Physical album shipment volume in the United States to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

The Journal of Ecological Economics and Musical Distribution

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in the Motor City and the shipment volume of physical music albums throughout the United States. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we aimed to answer the burning question: is there a direct link between the smog in Detroit and the audio delight brought to our ears through physical music media? Unsurprisingly, the results were quite an earful.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938, signaling a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Yes, you read that right - music truly thrives in the presence of air pollutants! Puzzling as it may seem, it appears that the more toxic the air quality in Detroit, the greater the influx of physical music discs gracing our shelves.

This unexpected association opens up a new era in environmental economics, demonstrating the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. Furthermore, in the spirit of good academic humor, we couldn't resist a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in the Motor City and the shipment volume of physical music albums throughout the United States. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we aimed to answer the burning question: is there a direct link between the smog in Detroit and the audio delight brought to our ears through physical music media? Unsurprisingly, the results were quite an earful.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938, signaling a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Yes, you read that right - music truly thrives in the presence of air pollutants! Puzzling as it may seem, it appears that the more toxic the air quality in Detroit, the greater the influx of physical music discs gracing our shelves.

This unexpected association opens up a new era in environmental economics, demonstrating the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. Furthermore, in the spirit of good academic humor, we couldn't resist a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of environmental factors and consumer behaviors has long been a subject of academic intrigue. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit, the heart of the American automobile industry, and the shipment volume of physical music albums across the United States. This unexpected connection, intriguing as it may be, forces us to confront the symbiosis between the sounds of music and the presence of particulate matter. It appears that the beat of society moves to the rhythm of pollution.

As we delve into this uncharted territory of environmental economics, we are met with a surprising harmony of data. Our analysis has revealed a robust relationship between the levels of air pollutants in Detroit and the shipment volume of physical music albums nationwide. One might say, it's a pollution epidemic with a melodic twist!

The correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 is a hard number to ignore, pointing to a strong positive association between the smoggy skies of Detroit and the influx of musical delights gracing the nation. It seems that while cleaner air may be music to our lungs, it is the polluted air that truly strikes a chord with our hearts – and wallets. This finding prompts us to reconsider the environmental repercussions on consumer preferences and market dynamics, adding a new layer of complexity to the symphony of economic forces.

In the spirit of academic exploration – and a good chuckle – we can't resist injecting a touch of humor into our findings. So here's a dad joke for the road: Did you hear about the air pollution that started a band? It wanted to drop some sick tracks, but instead, it just dropped particulates.

As we journey further into this unexplored terrain of environmental influences on consumer behavior, we hope to uncover more insights and perhaps stumble upon more unexpected connections. After all, as researchers, we must tune in to the world around us, even if it means listening to the smog-filled symphony of the Motor City.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in the Motor City and the shipment volume of physical music albums throughout the United States. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we aimed to answer the burning question: is there a direct link between the smog in Detroit and the audio delight brought to our ears through physical music media? Unsurprisingly, the results were quite an earful.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938, signaling a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Yes, you read that right - music truly thrives in the presence of air pollutants! Puzzling as it may seem, it appears that the more toxic the air quality in Detroit, the greater the influx of physical music discs gracing our shelves.

This unexpected association opens up a new era in environmental economics, demonstrating the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. Furthermore, in the spirit of good academic humor, we couldn't resist a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of environmental factors and consumer behaviors has long been a subject of academic intrigue. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit, the heart of the American automobile industry, and the shipment volume of physical music albums across the United States. This unexpected connection, intriguing as it may be, forces us to confront the symbiosis between the sounds of music and the presence of particulate matter. It appears that the beat of society moves to the rhythm of pollution.
As we delve into this uncharted territory of environmental economics, we are met with a surprising harmony of data. Our analysis has revealed a robust relationship between the levels of air pollutants in Detroit and the shipment volume of physical music albums nationwide. One might say, it's a pollution epidemic with a melodic twist!
The correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 is a hard number to ignore, pointing to a strong positive association between the smoggy skies of Detroit and the influx of musical delights gracing the nation. It seems that while cleaner air may be music to our lungs, it is the polluted air that truly strikes a chord with our hearts – and wallets. This finding prompts us to reconsider the environmental repercussions on consumer preferences and market dynamics, adding a new layer of complexity to the symphony of economic forces.
In the spirit of academic exploration – and a good chuckle – we can't resist injecting a touch of humor into our findings. So here's a dad joke for the road: Did you hear about the air pollution that started a band? It wanted to drop some sick tracks, but instead, it just dropped particulates.
As we journey further into this unexplored terrain of environmental influences on consumer behavior, we hope to uncover more insights and perhaps stumble upon more unexpected connections. After all, as researchers, we must tune in to the world around us, even if it means listening to the smog-filled symphony of the Motor City.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Air Quality and Album Sales: A Statistical Analysis," Smith et al. present a comprehensive examination of the possible link between air pollution levels in Detroit and the shipment volume of physical music albums in the United States. The authors find a strong positive correlation between the two variables, suggesting that music sales are influenced by environmental factors. This finding challenges the traditional understanding of consumer behavior and raises questions about the interplay between air quality and audio commerce.

If you think this correlation is far-fetched, just wait until you hear the next punchline: Why don't air pollutants ever play hide and seek? Because good luck finding somewhere for them to hide while the music's blaring!

Doe and Jones investigate a similar phenomenon in "Toxic Tunes: The Impact of Air Pollution on Music Industry Trends." Their study dives deep into the intricacies of air pollution in urban centers, particularly in Detroit, and its surprising effects on the shipment volume of physical music albums. The authors reveal a significant relationship between the presence of carbon emissions and the demand for musical products, shedding light on the unanticipated synergy between pollution and pop tunes.

Did you hear about the musician who could only perform in heavily polluted cities? His favorite genre was smog rock.

As we move beyond the traditional academic literature, let's consider the relevance of non-fiction works such as "The Economics of Air Pollution" by William K. Stevens and "The Music Industry Handbook" by Paul Rutter. These texts offer valuable insights into environmental economics and the dynamics of the music industry, providing a foundation for understanding the intersection of air pollution and album shipments.

In a similar vein, fictional works like "The Sound and the Fury" by William Faulkner and "Smokey the Bear Sings the Blues" by Jane Bailey are evocative of the melodic themes that permeate our exploration of pollution's musical influence. While these are works of fiction, they capture the essence of our research in a whimsical and thought-provoking manner.

To extend our literature review beyond the conventional sources, we delved into some unexpected material. Surprisingly, our inquiry led us to peruse CVS receipts, where we stumbled upon an elusive connection between air pollution levels and the purchase of kazoo-themed merchandise. While this unconventional approach raised eyebrows in the academic setting, it only amplified our commitment to uncovering the unexplored harmonies of environmental economics and musical consumption.

And there you have it folks, the weirder side of academia!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista . You used data from 1999 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in the Motor City and the shipment volume of physical music albums throughout the United States. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we aimed to answer the burning question: is there a direct link between the smog in Detroit and the audio delight brought to our ears through physical music media? Unsurprisingly, the results were quite an earful.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938, signaling a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Yes, you read that right - music truly thrives in the presence of air pollutants! Puzzling as it may seem, it appears that the more toxic the air quality in Detroit, the greater the influx of physical music discs gracing our shelves.

This unexpected association opens up a new era in environmental economics, demonstrating the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. Furthermore, in the spirit of good academic humor, we couldn't resist a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of environmental factors and consumer behaviors has long been a subject of academic intrigue. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit, the heart of the American automobile industry, and the shipment volume of physical music albums across the United States. This unexpected connection, intriguing as it may be, forces us to confront the symbiosis between the sounds of music and the presence of particulate matter. It appears that the beat of society moves to the rhythm of pollution.
As we delve into this uncharted territory of environmental economics, we are met with a surprising harmony of data. Our analysis has revealed a robust relationship between the levels of air pollutants in Detroit and the shipment volume of physical music albums nationwide. One might say, it's a pollution epidemic with a melodic twist!
The correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 is a hard number to ignore, pointing to a strong positive association between the smoggy skies of Detroit and the influx of musical delights gracing the nation. It seems that while cleaner air may be music to our lungs, it is the polluted air that truly strikes a chord with our hearts – and wallets. This finding prompts us to reconsider the environmental repercussions on consumer preferences and market dynamics, adding a new layer of complexity to the symphony of economic forces.
In the spirit of academic exploration – and a good chuckle – we can't resist injecting a touch of humor into our findings. So here's a dad joke for the road: Did you hear about the air pollution that started a band? It wanted to drop some sick tracks, but instead, it just dropped particulates.
As we journey further into this unexplored terrain of environmental influences on consumer behavior, we hope to uncover more insights and perhaps stumble upon more unexpected connections. After all, as researchers, we must tune in to the world around us, even if it means listening to the smog-filled symphony of the Motor City.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the seemingly harmonious correlation between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States, our research team employed a rigorous and perhaps slightly unconventional methodology.

First, our team scoured through an extensive array of publicly available data sources, including the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, spanning the years 1999 to 2022. We then embraced our inner data detectives to extract and harmonize the information on air pollution levels in Detroit and the volume of physical music album shipments across the nation. As we sifted through the digital airwaves of data, we couldn't help but feel like we were conducting a musical composition of sorts – with data points replacing musical notes! Speaking of musical notes, did you hear about the environmentalist who only listened to music on vinyl? He said it had a more "natural" sound.

Once armed with this wealth of data, we set out to unravel the complexities of this peculiar relationship. Our statistical analysis involved performing a sophisticated regression analysis, utilizing a robust econometric model that accounted for various confounding variables. As we delved deeper into the tangled web of environmental and economic data, we were struck by the symphonic nature of the relationship between air pollution and physical album shipments. Our model danced a statistical waltz, illuminating the unsuspecting ties between the pollutants in the atmosphere and the movement of melodic CDs through the marketplace.

Additionally, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected our data to a battery of sensitivity analyses and robustness checks, akin to tuning multiple instruments to play in perfect harmony. Every note, or rather data point, was meticulously scrutinized to validate the resilience of our results. After all, in the realm of quantitative research, the goal is to hit all the right chords – or rather, p-values.

In accordance with the scientific ethos of full transparency and reproducibility, we meticulously documented our data collection methods, model specifications, and analytical procedures to allow for the replication and scrutiny of our findings. Our research is an open invitation to all fellow academics to join our symphonic exploration of the nexus between environmental pollutants and consumer preferences. For, in the words of a musical prodigy turned statistician, "Data speaks, but only to those who listen carefully."

With our methodological ensemble finely tuned, we proceeded to conduct an in-depth exploration of the correlation between air pollution in Detroit and the shipment volume of physical music albums in the United States, ultimately orchestrating the revelation of this unexpected and sonorous bond.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista .

For the time period 1999 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8301938, r-squared of 0.6892217, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in the Motor City and the shipment volume of physical music albums throughout the United States. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we aimed to answer the burning question: is there a direct link between the smog in Detroit and the audio delight brought to our ears through physical music media? Unsurprisingly, the results were quite an earful.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938, signaling a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Yes, you read that right - music truly thrives in the presence of air pollutants! Puzzling as it may seem, it appears that the more toxic the air quality in Detroit, the greater the influx of physical music discs gracing our shelves.

This unexpected association opens up a new era in environmental economics, demonstrating the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. Furthermore, in the spirit of good academic humor, we couldn't resist a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of environmental factors and consumer behaviors has long been a subject of academic intrigue. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit, the heart of the American automobile industry, and the shipment volume of physical music albums across the United States. This unexpected connection, intriguing as it may be, forces us to confront the symbiosis between the sounds of music and the presence of particulate matter. It appears that the beat of society moves to the rhythm of pollution.
As we delve into this uncharted territory of environmental economics, we are met with a surprising harmony of data. Our analysis has revealed a robust relationship between the levels of air pollutants in Detroit and the shipment volume of physical music albums nationwide. One might say, it's a pollution epidemic with a melodic twist!
The correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 is a hard number to ignore, pointing to a strong positive association between the smoggy skies of Detroit and the influx of musical delights gracing the nation. It seems that while cleaner air may be music to our lungs, it is the polluted air that truly strikes a chord with our hearts – and wallets. This finding prompts us to reconsider the environmental repercussions on consumer preferences and market dynamics, adding a new layer of complexity to the symphony of economic forces.
In the spirit of academic exploration – and a good chuckle – we can't resist injecting a touch of humor into our findings. So here's a dad joke for the road: Did you hear about the air pollution that started a band? It wanted to drop some sick tracks, but instead, it just dropped particulates.
As we journey further into this unexplored terrain of environmental influences on consumer behavior, we hope to uncover more insights and perhaps stumble upon more unexpected connections. After all, as researchers, we must tune in to the world around us, even if it means listening to the smog-filled symphony of the Motor City.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data from 1999 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States. This robust correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6892217, indicating that approximately 69% of the variability in physical album shipment volume can be explained by changes in air pollution levels in Detroit. Additionally, the statistical significance was confirmed with a p-value less than 0.01, providing strong evidence to support the association between these two variables.

Fig. 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States. The upward trend in the data points reflects the harmonious rise in physical album shipments coinciding with increased air pollution levels in Detroit over the years.

The unexpected correlation between air pollution in Detroit and physical album shipment volume across the United States underscores the intricate interplay between environmental factors and consumer behavior. This finding challenges conventional notions and unveils the melody hidden within the haze of pollution, presenting a novel dimension to the economic impact of environmental degradation on consumer preferences.

In keeping with the spirit of scholarly levity, we couldn't resist sneaking in a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes! As researchers, we believe in both the rigidity of data and the lightheartedness of academic humor.

The unexpected harmony between air pollution in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States introduces a new avenue for exploration in environmental economics. This correlation prompts further investigation into the intricate relationships between environmental degradation, market dynamics, and human behavior, revealing the symphonic convergence of seemingly disparate elements.

In conclusion, the confluence of air pollution and physical album shipment volume presents a curious and thought-provoking puzzle that merits further scrutiny. Who knew that the smog in Detroit could contribute to the crescendo of physical music media across the nation? This unexpected melody of environmental and economic forces calls for continued exploration and understanding as we navigate the complex orchestration of environmental influences on consumer behavior and market dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in the Motor City and the shipment volume of physical music albums throughout the United States. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we aimed to answer the burning question: is there a direct link between the smog in Detroit and the audio delight brought to our ears through physical music media? Unsurprisingly, the results were quite an earful.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938, signaling a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Yes, you read that right - music truly thrives in the presence of air pollutants! Puzzling as it may seem, it appears that the more toxic the air quality in Detroit, the greater the influx of physical music discs gracing our shelves.

This unexpected association opens up a new era in environmental economics, demonstrating the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. Furthermore, in the spirit of good academic humor, we couldn't resist a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Air Quality and Album Sales: A Statistical Analysis," Smith et al. present a comprehensive examination of the possible link between air pollution levels in Detroit and the shipment volume of physical music albums in the United States. The authors find a strong positive correlation between the two variables, suggesting that music sales are influenced by environmental factors. This finding challenges the traditional understanding of consumer behavior and raises questions about the interplay between air quality and audio commerce.
If you think this correlation is far-fetched, just wait until you hear the next punchline: Why don't air pollutants ever play hide and seek? Because good luck finding somewhere for them to hide while the music's blaring!
Doe and Jones investigate a similar phenomenon in "Toxic Tunes: The Impact of Air Pollution on Music Industry Trends." Their study dives deep into the intricacies of air pollution in urban centers, particularly in Detroit, and its surprising effects on the shipment volume of physical music albums. The authors reveal a significant relationship between the presence of carbon emissions and the demand for musical products, shedding light on the unanticipated synergy between pollution and pop tunes.
Did you hear about the musician who could only perform in heavily polluted cities? His favorite genre was smog rock.
As we move beyond the traditional academic literature, let's consider the relevance of non-fiction works such as "The Economics of Air Pollution" by William K. Stevens and "The Music Industry Handbook" by Paul Rutter. These texts offer valuable insights into environmental economics and the dynamics of the music industry, providing a foundation for understanding the intersection of air pollution and album shipments.
In a similar vein, fictional works like "The Sound and the Fury" by William Faulkner and "Smokey the Bear Sings the Blues" by Jane Bailey are evocative of the melodic themes that permeate our exploration of pollution's musical influence. While these are works of fiction, they capture the essence of our research in a whimsical and thought-provoking manner.
To extend our literature review beyond the conventional sources, we delved into some unexpected material. Surprisingly, our inquiry led us to peruse CVS receipts, where we stumbled upon an elusive connection between air pollution levels and the purchase of kazoo-themed merchandise. While this unconventional approach raised eyebrows in the academic setting, it only amplified our commitment to uncovering the unexplored harmonies of environmental economics and musical consumption.
And there you have it folks, the weirder side of academia!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 1999 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States. This robust correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6892217, indicating that approximately 69% of the variability in physical album shipment volume can be explained by changes in air pollution levels in Detroit. Additionally, the statistical significance was confirmed with a p-value less than 0.01, providing strong evidence to support the association between these two variables.
Fig. 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States. The upward trend in the data points reflects the harmonious rise in physical album shipments coinciding with increased air pollution levels in Detroit over the years.
The unexpected correlation between air pollution in Detroit and physical album shipment volume across the United States underscores the intricate interplay between environmental factors and consumer behavior. This finding challenges conventional notions and unveils the melody hidden within the haze of pollution, presenting a novel dimension to the economic impact of environmental degradation on consumer preferences.
In keeping with the spirit of scholarly levity, we couldn't resist sneaking in a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes! As researchers, we believe in both the rigidity of data and the lightheartedness of academic humor.
The unexpected harmony between air pollution in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States introduces a new avenue for exploration in environmental economics. This correlation prompts further investigation into the intricate relationships between environmental degradation, market dynamics, and human behavior, revealing the symphonic convergence of seemingly disparate elements.
In conclusion, the confluence of air pollution and physical album shipment volume presents a curious and thought-provoking puzzle that merits further scrutiny. Who knew that the smog in Detroit could contribute to the crescendo of physical music media across the nation? This unexpected melody of environmental and economic forces calls for continued exploration and understanding as we navigate the complex orchestration of environmental influences on consumer behavior and market dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study accentuate the unanticipated relationship between air pollution in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States. Our findings echo the earlier research by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, indicating a robust positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The statistical significance of our analysis further solidifies this connection, shedding light on the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. This association challenges traditional economic models and introduces a unique melody to the symphony of environmental and market dynamics.

If a research study about air pollution and physical album shipments can glean such intriguing results, perhaps we should start assessing the impact of noise pollution on vinyl records – after all, they're just trying to spin some tunes in peace! On a related note, it seems that the air quality in Detroit may inadvertently be contributing to the rhythm and blues of album shipment volume nationwide.

The unexpected convergence of our study's findings with the unconventional literature review only goes to show that academic inquiry can sometimes take us on an unexpected and comedic journey. Much like the musician who could only perform in heavily polluted cities, this research has struck a chord in uncovering the harmony between pollution and pop tunes. It reminds us that, at times, the most unexpected pairings produce the most insightful outcomes.

Turning back to the research at hand, our results not only reinforce the peculiar relationship highlighted in previous studies but also open up a new era in environmental economics. The influence of air pollution on the demand for physical music products challenges the orthodox understanding of consumer behavior and, with a twinge of irony, may provide new insights for acoustical ecology.

As we navigate the complexities of environmental influences on market dynamics and consumer behavior, it's essential to embrace both the serious gravity of statistical evidence and the lightheartedness of academic humor. Who knew that air pollution and album shipments could strike such a harmonious chord? It seems that, in the world of research, even seemingly dissonant elements can come together to create a surprisingly pleasant tune.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Detroit and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in the Motor City and the shipment volume of physical music albums throughout the United States. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we aimed to answer the burning question: is there a direct link between the smog in Detroit and the audio delight brought to our ears through physical music media? Unsurprisingly, the results were quite an earful.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938, signaling a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Yes, you read that right - music truly thrives in the presence of air pollutants! Puzzling as it may seem, it appears that the more toxic the air quality in Detroit, the greater the influx of physical music discs gracing our shelves.

This unexpected association opens up a new era in environmental economics, demonstrating the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. Furthermore, in the spirit of good academic humor, we couldn't resist a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of environmental factors and consumer behaviors has long been a subject of academic intrigue. In this study, we explore the peculiar relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit, the heart of the American automobile industry, and the shipment volume of physical music albums across the United States. This unexpected connection, intriguing as it may be, forces us to confront the symbiosis between the sounds of music and the presence of particulate matter. It appears that the beat of society moves to the rhythm of pollution.
As we delve into this uncharted territory of environmental economics, we are met with a surprising harmony of data. Our analysis has revealed a robust relationship between the levels of air pollutants in Detroit and the shipment volume of physical music albums nationwide. One might say, it's a pollution epidemic with a melodic twist!
The correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 is a hard number to ignore, pointing to a strong positive association between the smoggy skies of Detroit and the influx of musical delights gracing the nation. It seems that while cleaner air may be music to our lungs, it is the polluted air that truly strikes a chord with our hearts – and wallets. This finding prompts us to reconsider the environmental repercussions on consumer preferences and market dynamics, adding a new layer of complexity to the symphony of economic forces.
In the spirit of academic exploration – and a good chuckle – we can't resist injecting a touch of humor into our findings. So here's a dad joke for the road: Did you hear about the air pollution that started a band? It wanted to drop some sick tracks, but instead, it just dropped particulates.
As we journey further into this unexplored terrain of environmental influences on consumer behavior, we hope to uncover more insights and perhaps stumble upon more unexpected connections. After all, as researchers, we must tune in to the world around us, even if it means listening to the smog-filled symphony of the Motor City.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 1999 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938 between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States. This robust correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6892217, indicating that approximately 69% of the variability in physical album shipment volume can be explained by changes in air pollution levels in Detroit. Additionally, the statistical significance was confirmed with a p-value less than 0.01, providing strong evidence to support the association between these two variables.
Fig. 1 portrays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States. The upward trend in the data points reflects the harmonious rise in physical album shipments coinciding with increased air pollution levels in Detroit over the years.
The unexpected correlation between air pollution in Detroit and physical album shipment volume across the United States underscores the intricate interplay between environmental factors and consumer behavior. This finding challenges conventional notions and unveils the melody hidden within the haze of pollution, presenting a novel dimension to the economic impact of environmental degradation on consumer preferences.
In keeping with the spirit of scholarly levity, we couldn't resist sneaking in a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes! As researchers, we believe in both the rigidity of data and the lightheartedness of academic humor.
The unexpected harmony between air pollution in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States introduces a new avenue for exploration in environmental economics. This correlation prompts further investigation into the intricate relationships between environmental degradation, market dynamics, and human behavior, revealing the symphonic convergence of seemingly disparate elements.
In conclusion, the confluence of air pollution and physical album shipment volume presents a curious and thought-provoking puzzle that merits further scrutiny. Who knew that the smog in Detroit could contribute to the crescendo of physical music media across the nation? This unexpected melody of environmental and economic forces calls for continued exploration and understanding as we navigate the complex orchestration of environmental influences on consumer behavior and market dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our study has uncovered a melody hidden within the haze of pollution, pointing to a remarkable relationship between air pollution in Detroit and physical album shipment volume across the United States. The unexpected harmony between these seemingly unrelated factors challenges conventional wisdom and adds a new dimension to the economic impact of environmental degradation on consumer preferences. It seems that the smog in Detroit is not just puffing up the skies but also puffing up the physical album market!

This unexpected melody between air pollution and music media leaves us pondering a new thought puzzle: did the smog in Detroit compose an opera of plastic discs and melodies? It's a symphony no one expected, and yet, it demands our attention! As researchers, we are tuned in to these melodies – pun intended – and recognize the need to further explore these uncharted territories of environmental economics and consumer behavior.

However, it's time to bring this research to an end. We believe that this study has struck a chord and demonstrated the richness of the interconnected web of environmental and economic forces. No further research is needed in this area, as we have hit the high notes, and it's time to pass the baton to the next scholars.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Economics and Musical Distribution


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Urban Environmental Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Carbon Monoxide to Compact Discs: A Critical Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Detroit and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the fascinating and unexpected correlation between air pollution levels in the Motor City and the shipment volume of physical music albums throughout the United States. With data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we aimed to answer the burning question: is there a direct link between the smog in Detroit and the audio delight brought to our ears through physical music media? Unsurprisingly, the results were quite an earful.
Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8301938, signaling a strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Detroit and physical album shipment volume in the United States from 1999 to 2022. Yes, you read that right - music truly thrives in the presence of air pollutants! Puzzling as it may seem, it appears that the more toxic the air quality in Detroit, the greater the influx of physical music discs gracing our shelves.
This unexpected association opens up a new era in environmental economics, demonstrating the melodic repercussions of environmental degradation on consumer behavior. Furthermore, in the spirit of good academic humor, we couldn't resist a dad joke: Why did the air pollution study break up with the physical albums? Because it just couldn't handle the high notes!

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Detroit, physical music albums, shipment volume, United States, correlation coefficient, environmental degradation, consumer behavior, Environmental Protection Agency, Statista, melodic repercussions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Detroit
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Detroit

Physical album shipment volume in the United States
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Physical album shipment volume in the United States

Correlation r = 0.8301938 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6892217 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Physical album shipment volume in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Detroit) over the 24 years from 1999 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.2E-7. 0.0000005196811551600589000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 5.2E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,924,257 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 23 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 23 because we have two variables measured over a period of 24 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Detroit (Bad air quality days)14.24668.7431715.890412.876710.68497.3770513.15076.849329.04114.098363.561646.02745.753429.836072.739733.561644.383564.918033.287673.835623.287675.191262.465754.93151
Physical album shipment volume in the United States (Units)93890000094250000088190000080330000074600000076700000070540000061970000051110000036840000029290000025300000024080000019820000017220000014280000012290000097600000877000005200000047500000316000004670000033400000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([14.2466,8.74317,15.8904,12.8767,10.6849,7.37705,13.1507,6.84932,9.0411,4.09836,3.56164,6.0274,5.75342,9.83607,2.73973,3.56164,4.38356,4.91803,3.28767,3.83562,3.28767,5.19126,2.46575,4.93151,])
array_2 = np.array([938900000,942500000,881900000,803300000,746000000,767000000,705400000,619700000,511100000,368400000,292900000,253000000,240800000,198200000,172200000,142800000,122900000,97600000,87700000,52000000,47500000,31600000,46700000,33400000,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Detroit"
array_2_name = "Physical album shipment volume in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 2462 · Black Variable ID: 20551 · Red Variable ID: 155
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0