about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,452 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and the second variable is Google searches for 'climate change'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2015, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Roger Federer played fewer Grand Slam Finals, his reduced sweat and carbon "serves" emissions had a measurable impact. With a smaller "foot-faultprint" on the tennis court, he was effectively helping to "deuce" climate change. The connection? It's all about the "match" between Federer's on-court presence and the Earth's climate; as one cooled down, so did the other.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cyberpunk-inspired tennis match where Roger Federer competes in the finals with unparalleled determination. As the match intensifies, visualize the Earth’s temperature rising, causing a dramatic melting effect around the tennis court. In the background, depict a surge of people typing 'climate change' into their phones, creating a wave of searches that amplifies as the match progresses. Emphasize the intensity of the match and the increasing interest in climate change with a cyberpunk aesthetic. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic inspired by bauhaus Cute cartoon Vaporwave Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change', in the following situation: The heat generated from all those intense matches has been serving up a global warming ace! As Federer's final appearances volleyed higher, so did the Earth's temperature, causing a real meltdown. It seems his play on the court has been making a racket in the atmosphere, serving as a major forehand for climate change awareness. And as fans flocked to the internet to find out more, the search for 'climate change' just kept rallying, creating a love-love relationship between Grand Slam finals and rising temperatures.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture an intense tennis match with Roger Federer in the finals, playing with pure focus and determination. As the match heats up, the Earth’s temperature begins to rise, causing a dramatic melting effect around the tennis court. Meanwhile, in the background, a surge of people are seen typing ‘climate change’ into their phones, creating a wave of searches that amplifies as the match progresses. The visual depicts a combination of the intensity of the Grand Slam finals and the increasing interest in climate change.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: Picture an intense tennis match with Roger Federer in the finals, playing with pure focus and determination. As the match heats up, the Earth’s temperature begins to rise, causing a dramatic melting effect around the tennis court. Meanwhile, in the background, a surge of people are seen typing ‘climate change’ into their phones, creating a wave of searches that amplifies as the match progresses. The visual depicts a combination of the intensity of the Grand Slam finals and the increasing interest in climate change. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cyberpunk-inspired tennis match where Roger Federer competes in the finals with unparalleled determination. As the match intensifies, visualize the Earth’s temperature rising, causing a dramatic melting effect around the tennis court. In the background, depict a surge of people typing 'climate change' into their phones, creating a wave of searches that amplifies as the match progresses. Emphasize the intensity of the match and the increasing interest in climate change with a cyberpunk aesthetic.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer caused climate change (Google searches for 'climate change') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity

The Journal of Sport Science & Climate Inquiry

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2015.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this lighthearted yet rigorous study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of Grand Slam finals played by tennis maestro Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to delve into this peculiar correlation, and the findings are nothing short of a smashing revelation. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Our study provides ample evidence that when Federer is serving up a storm in the tennis world, the public's interest in climate change heats up as well. We offer unique insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, proving once and for all that sports and climate have a volley special relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this lighthearted yet rigorous study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of Grand Slam finals played by tennis maestro Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to delve into this peculiar correlation, and the findings are nothing short of a smashing revelation. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Our study provides ample evidence that when Federer is serving up a storm in the tennis world, the public's interest in climate change heats up as well. We offer unique insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, proving once and for all that sports and climate have a volley special relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the saying goes, "The ball's in your court," and in the case of our research, the tennis maestro Roger Federer has undoubtedly served up a fascinating connection to an entirely unexpected domain – climate change curiosity. While many may skeptically raise an eyebrow at the idea, our findings reveal a compelling correlation between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Federer and the public's interest in climate change, prompting even the most avid tennis fan to exclaim, "That's ace!"

In the world of academia, where we routinely dissect complex theories and conduct meticulous studies, a lighthearted and quirky investigation such as this one may seem as out of place as a pink flamingo in a snowstorm. However, let's not overlook the power of whimsy and humor in bringing attention to unexpected relationships – much like an underdog player seizing an unexpected victory on the court.

So, grab your tennis rackets and climate change banners, as we embark on a delightful journey to explore this seemingly bizarre connection, shedding light on the delightful nuances of data analysis and human curiosity along the way. After all, in the game of research, where love means nothing, sometimes the most improbable correlations hold the key to unlocking new perspectives and understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this lighthearted yet rigorous study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of Grand Slam finals played by tennis maestro Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to delve into this peculiar correlation, and the findings are nothing short of a smashing revelation. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Our study provides ample evidence that when Federer is serving up a storm in the tennis world, the public's interest in climate change heats up as well. We offer unique insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, proving once and for all that sports and climate have a volley special relationship.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "The ball's in your court," and in the case of our research, the tennis maestro Roger Federer has undoubtedly served up a fascinating connection to an entirely unexpected domain – climate change curiosity. While many may skeptically raise an eyebrow at the idea, our findings reveal a compelling correlation between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Federer and the public's interest in climate change, prompting even the most avid tennis fan to exclaim, "That's ace!"
In the world of academia, where we routinely dissect complex theories and conduct meticulous studies, a lighthearted and quirky investigation such as this one may seem as out of place as a pink flamingo in a snowstorm. However, let's not overlook the power of whimsy and humor in bringing attention to unexpected relationships – much like an underdog player seizing an unexpected victory on the court.
So, grab your tennis rackets and climate change banners, as we embark on a delightful journey to explore this seemingly bizarre connection, shedding light on the delightful nuances of data analysis and human curiosity along the way. After all, in the game of research, where love means nothing, sometimes the most improbable correlations hold the key to unlocking new perspectives and understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2010) studied the influence of sports events on public interest in environmental issues. The author's findings revealed a reciprocal relationship between major sports tournaments and public engagement with climate-related topics. Similarly, Doe et al. (2013) examined the impact of high-profile athletes on global awareness of ecological challenges. The study highlighted the potential for sports figures to act as catalysts for heightened concern about climate change.

Jones et al. (2015) delved into the psychological aspects of spectator sports and its subconscious effects on environmental consciousness. Their investigation demonstrated significant spikes in environmental searches following pivotal moments in sporting events, indicating a parallel surge in public interest.

While the aforementioned studies offer insightful perspectives on the interconnectedness of sports and societal concerns, our research takes a distinctive approach by specifically honing in on the remarkable relationship between Roger Federer's Grand Slam performances and the fluctuations in Google searches for "climate change."

In "Climate Change: What Everyone Needs to Know," the authors illustrate the urgency of environmental awareness, emphasizing the far-reaching implications of global climate patterns. This serves as a backdrop to our exploration, as we uncover an unexpected correlation that challenges traditional notions of cause and effect.

Similarly, "The Tennis Champion's Guide to Climate Conversations" reflects the intersection of sports and environmental dialogue, albeit in a fictitious context. While not a factual account, the whimsical narrative underscores the thematic fusion that underpins our study – a fusion that asserts itself as real, despite its improbable guise.

Moreover, movies such as "Aces of Climate Change" and "The Climate Slam" may not offer direct scholarly insights, but they illustrate the public's intrigue with the thematic blend of tennis prowess and environmental advocacy. These cultural touchstones lay the groundwork for our investigation into the captivating correlation between Federer's court triumphs and society's curiosity about climate change.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2015

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this lighthearted yet rigorous study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of Grand Slam finals played by tennis maestro Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to delve into this peculiar correlation, and the findings are nothing short of a smashing revelation. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Our study provides ample evidence that when Federer is serving up a storm in the tennis world, the public's interest in climate change heats up as well. We offer unique insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, proving once and for all that sports and climate have a volley special relationship.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "The ball's in your court," and in the case of our research, the tennis maestro Roger Federer has undoubtedly served up a fascinating connection to an entirely unexpected domain – climate change curiosity. While many may skeptically raise an eyebrow at the idea, our findings reveal a compelling correlation between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Federer and the public's interest in climate change, prompting even the most avid tennis fan to exclaim, "That's ace!"
In the world of academia, where we routinely dissect complex theories and conduct meticulous studies, a lighthearted and quirky investigation such as this one may seem as out of place as a pink flamingo in a snowstorm. However, let's not overlook the power of whimsy and humor in bringing attention to unexpected relationships – much like an underdog player seizing an unexpected victory on the court.
So, grab your tennis rackets and climate change banners, as we embark on a delightful journey to explore this seemingly bizarre connection, shedding light on the delightful nuances of data analysis and human curiosity along the way. After all, in the game of research, where love means nothing, sometimes the most improbable correlations hold the key to unlocking new perspectives and understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the curious web of connection between Roger Federer's Grand Slam performances and public interest in climate change, we embraced an unconventional mix of data collection and analysis – a bit like mixing ice cream and pickles. First off, we joyfully scavenged the scholarly savannah we call the internet for data ranging from the tennis courts to the peaks and valleys of global web searches. Our primary sources of sustenance were Wikipedia and Google Trends, cunningly combined with a dash of statistical wizardry and a sprinkle of comical inquisition.

Since our research investigated the period from 2008 to 2015, we summoned our trusty spreadsheet scribes to meticulously record the number of Grand Slam finals graced by the illustrious Roger Federer during this time frame. As we plunged into the depths of Google Trends, we eagerly tracked the search interest for "climate change" and presented a mix of quantitative and quizzical analyses that would make even the most stoic statistician smirk.

With bated breath, we calculated the correlation coefficient and p-value using a pinch of regression analysis, a dollop of multivariate techniques, and a hint of speculative finger-crossing. As our data danced through the algorithms with the grace of Federer on the grass courts, the results emerged with an unmistakable vibrancy that left us as enchanted as a tennis novice watching a thrilling rally for the first time.

Now, if we were to put it in tennis terms, our methodology was like Federer's backhand – well-rehearsed, with a touch of flourish and a pinch of unpredictability, leaving opponents and skeptics watching in awe. Hence, armed with our unorthodox methodology and heaping servings of curiosity, we approached our research with the playfulness of an exhibition match and the precision of a championship final.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2015, you found a correlation 0.9064737, r-squared of 0.8216946, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this lighthearted yet rigorous study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of Grand Slam finals played by tennis maestro Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to delve into this peculiar correlation, and the findings are nothing short of a smashing revelation. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Our study provides ample evidence that when Federer is serving up a storm in the tennis world, the public's interest in climate change heats up as well. We offer unique insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, proving once and for all that sports and climate have a volley special relationship.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the saying goes, "The ball's in your court," and in the case of our research, the tennis maestro Roger Federer has undoubtedly served up a fascinating connection to an entirely unexpected domain – climate change curiosity. While many may skeptically raise an eyebrow at the idea, our findings reveal a compelling correlation between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Federer and the public's interest in climate change, prompting even the most avid tennis fan to exclaim, "That's ace!"
In the world of academia, where we routinely dissect complex theories and conduct meticulous studies, a lighthearted and quirky investigation such as this one may seem as out of place as a pink flamingo in a snowstorm. However, let's not overlook the power of whimsy and humor in bringing attention to unexpected relationships – much like an underdog player seizing an unexpected victory on the court.
So, grab your tennis rackets and climate change banners, as we embark on a delightful journey to explore this seemingly bizarre connection, shedding light on the delightful nuances of data analysis and human curiosity along the way. After all, in the game of research, where love means nothing, sometimes the most improbable correlations hold the key to unlocking new perspectives and understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis uncovered a striking connection between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9064737, indicating a strong positive relationship. The resultant r-squared value of 0.8216946 suggests that approximately 82.17% of the variation in climate change searches can be explained by the number of Grand Slam finals played by the Swiss maestro. Rounding it off, we observed a p-value of less than 0.01, offering compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and affirm the existence of a noteworthy association.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot showcasing the tantalizing correlation between Federer's moments of triumph on the court and the surge in public curiosity about climate change. The robust clustering of data points highlights the synchronized rhythm between the two seemingly unrelated domains, akin to a perfectly executed synchronized tennis match. One might say that the correlation was a "smashing" discovery, both figuratively and perhaps, in a directionally literal sense.

The results of this research soar beyond mere statistical inferences – they serve as a poignant reminder of the peculiar and unexpected connections that permeate our world. Just as a topspin forehand can catch opponents off guard, the coherence between Grand Slam appearances and climate change inquiries has certainly caught us off guard in the best possible way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this lighthearted yet rigorous study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of Grand Slam finals played by tennis maestro Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to delve into this peculiar correlation, and the findings are nothing short of a smashing revelation. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Our study provides ample evidence that when Federer is serving up a storm in the tennis world, the public's interest in climate change heats up as well. We offer unique insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, proving once and for all that sports and climate have a volley special relationship.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2010) studied the influence of sports events on public interest in environmental issues. The author's findings revealed a reciprocal relationship between major sports tournaments and public engagement with climate-related topics. Similarly, Doe et al. (2013) examined the impact of high-profile athletes on global awareness of ecological challenges. The study highlighted the potential for sports figures to act as catalysts for heightened concern about climate change.
Jones et al. (2015) delved into the psychological aspects of spectator sports and its subconscious effects on environmental consciousness. Their investigation demonstrated significant spikes in environmental searches following pivotal moments in sporting events, indicating a parallel surge in public interest.
While the aforementioned studies offer insightful perspectives on the interconnectedness of sports and societal concerns, our research takes a distinctive approach by specifically honing in on the remarkable relationship between Roger Federer's Grand Slam performances and the fluctuations in Google searches for "climate change."
In "Climate Change: What Everyone Needs to Know," the authors illustrate the urgency of environmental awareness, emphasizing the far-reaching implications of global climate patterns. This serves as a backdrop to our exploration, as we uncover an unexpected correlation that challenges traditional notions of cause and effect.
Similarly, "The Tennis Champion's Guide to Climate Conversations" reflects the intersection of sports and environmental dialogue, albeit in a fictitious context. While not a factual account, the whimsical narrative underscores the thematic fusion that underpins our study – a fusion that asserts itself as real, despite its improbable guise.
Moreover, movies such as "Aces of Climate Change" and "The Climate Slam" may not offer direct scholarly insights, but they illustrate the public's intrigue with the thematic blend of tennis prowess and environmental advocacy. These cultural touchstones lay the groundwork for our investigation into the captivating correlation between Federer's court triumphs and society's curiosity about climate change.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis uncovered a striking connection between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9064737, indicating a strong positive relationship. The resultant r-squared value of 0.8216946 suggests that approximately 82.17% of the variation in climate change searches can be explained by the number of Grand Slam finals played by the Swiss maestro. Rounding it off, we observed a p-value of less than 0.01, offering compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and affirm the existence of a noteworthy association.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot showcasing the tantalizing correlation between Federer's moments of triumph on the court and the surge in public curiosity about climate change. The robust clustering of data points highlights the synchronized rhythm between the two seemingly unrelated domains, akin to a perfectly executed synchronized tennis match. One might say that the correlation was a "smashing" discovery, both figuratively and perhaps, in a directionally literal sense.
The results of this research soar beyond mere statistical inferences – they serve as a poignant reminder of the peculiar and unexpected connections that permeate our world. Just as a topspin forehand can catch opponents off guard, the coherence between Grand Slam appearances and climate change inquiries has certainly caught us off guard in the best possible way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have served up a compelling argument for the interconnectedness of Roger Federer's Grand Slam performances and public interest in climate change. Far from being a mere "ace" in the hole, our findings shed light on the dynamic relationship between the world of tennis and the pressing global issue of climate change. As we immerse ourselves in the implications of this unlikely correlation, it becomes clear that the connection between Federer's finesse on the court and societal curiosity about climate change is nothing short of a grand slam revelation.

Our research has lent empirical support to the whimsical notions posited in "The Tennis Champion's Guide to Climate Conversations," demonstrating that the thematic fusion between sports and environmental consciousness is indeed rooted in reality. The robust correlation coefficient and the compelling r-squared value attest to the profound impact of Federer's on-court triumphs on the public's interest in climate change, rendering our findings not just a volley of statistical data but a poignant commentary on the human penchant for finding unexpected connections.

Just as the "Aces of Climate Change" and "The Climate Slam" provided cultural touchstones for our investigation, our results ultimately serve as defining evidence of the captivating correlation between a tennis legend's feats and society's curiosity about climate issues. The correspondence between Federer's victories and the surge in climate-related searches on Google embodies the very essence of a perfectly executed rally, with each data point akin to a masterful stroke that combines power and precision.

While our study may have originated from a spirit of lighthearted curiosity, the resounding support for the relationship between Federer's Grand Slam finals and climate change searches underscores the potential for sports icons to serve as catalysts for broader societal engagement. As we bask in the glory of this unexpected correlation, it is clear that the ball is now in the court of future research to explore the nuanced mechanisms that underpin this dynamic interaction. The "advantage Federer" in sparking climate curiosity has been firmly established, inviting further exploration into the unexpected intersections that shape our collective consciousness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer and Google searches for 'climate change'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this lighthearted yet rigorous study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of Grand Slam finals played by tennis maestro Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to delve into this peculiar correlation, and the findings are nothing short of a smashing revelation. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Our study provides ample evidence that when Federer is serving up a storm in the tennis world, the public's interest in climate change heats up as well. We offer unique insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, proving once and for all that sports and climate have a volley special relationship.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "The ball's in your court," and in the case of our research, the tennis maestro Roger Federer has undoubtedly served up a fascinating connection to an entirely unexpected domain – climate change curiosity. While many may skeptically raise an eyebrow at the idea, our findings reveal a compelling correlation between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Federer and the public's interest in climate change, prompting even the most avid tennis fan to exclaim, "That's ace!"
In the world of academia, where we routinely dissect complex theories and conduct meticulous studies, a lighthearted and quirky investigation such as this one may seem as out of place as a pink flamingo in a snowstorm. However, let's not overlook the power of whimsy and humor in bringing attention to unexpected relationships – much like an underdog player seizing an unexpected victory on the court.
So, grab your tennis rackets and climate change banners, as we embark on a delightful journey to explore this seemingly bizarre connection, shedding light on the delightful nuances of data analysis and human curiosity along the way. After all, in the game of research, where love means nothing, sometimes the most improbable correlations hold the key to unlocking new perspectives and understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis uncovered a striking connection between the number of Grand Slam finals played by Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our analysis unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9064737, indicating a strong positive relationship. The resultant r-squared value of 0.8216946 suggests that approximately 82.17% of the variation in climate change searches can be explained by the number of Grand Slam finals played by the Swiss maestro. Rounding it off, we observed a p-value of less than 0.01, offering compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and affirm the existence of a noteworthy association.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot showcasing the tantalizing correlation between Federer's moments of triumph on the court and the surge in public curiosity about climate change. The robust clustering of data points highlights the synchronized rhythm between the two seemingly unrelated domains, akin to a perfectly executed synchronized tennis match. One might say that the correlation was a "smashing" discovery, both figuratively and perhaps, in a directionally literal sense.
The results of this research soar beyond mere statistical inferences – they serve as a poignant reminder of the peculiar and unexpected connections that permeate our world. Just as a topspin forehand can catch opponents off guard, the coherence between Grand Slam appearances and climate change inquiries has certainly caught us off guard in the best possible way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our wacky yet revelatory study has served aces in uncovering the remarkable link between Roger Federer's Grand Slam feats and the public's heightened interest in climate change. The striking correlation coefficient and p-value have shown that when it comes to the intersection of sports and environmental concerns, it's indeed game, set, and match. It seems that the Swiss maestro's on-court prowess has a forehand in causing a climate change in public curiosity.

As researchers, we're thrilled to have volleyed into uncharted territory and lobbed up such an unexpected connection. The robustness of our findings can't be dismissed as a mere "fluke" – they represent a genuine backhand winner in the realm of uncovering hidden relationships. The synchronicity between seeing Federer dominating the court and public curiosity heating up about climate change is as unexpected as a swift drop shot. It's a Grand Slam revelation, leaving us in a state of delightful bewilderment much like a ballboy in the line of a powerful serve.

With our findings in hand, we confidently declare that no additional research is warranted on this topic. We've served up an ace and confidently hang our tennis rackets, content that our work is a rally of research excellence. It's time to celebrate this delightful finding and, much like a tennis player after a tournament victory, bask in the sheer unexpectedness of it all.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sport Science & Climate Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Tennis-Climate Research Integration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Advantage Federer: A Grand Slam Connection to Climate Curiosity with an abstract of In this lighthearted yet rigorous study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of Grand Slam finals played by tennis maestro Roger Federer and the Google searches for "climate change". Our research team utilized data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to delve into this peculiar correlation, and the findings are nothing short of a smashing revelation. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9064737 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Our study provides ample evidence that when Federer is serving up a storm in the tennis world, the public's interest in climate change heats up as well. We offer unique insights into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena, proving once and for all that sports and climate have a volley special relationship.

ChatGPT:

Roger Federer, Grand Slam finals, tennis, climate change, Google searches, Wikipedia data, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, interconnectedness of phenomena, sports and climate relationship

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer

Google searches for 'climate change'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'climate change' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'climate change'

Correlation r = 0.9064737 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8216946 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'climate change') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer) over the 8 years from 2008 through 2015.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0019. 0.0019044463797120881000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.19% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 525 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20082009201020112012201320142015
Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer (Finals)34111012
Google searches for 'climate change' (Rel. search volume)6.916678.583336.583335.54.754.755.666676.41667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3,4,1,1,1,0,1,2,])
array_2 = np.array([6.91667,8.58333,6.58333,5.5,4.75,4.75,5.66667,6.41667,])
array_1_name = "Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'climate change'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2452 · Black Variable ID: 136 · Red Variable ID: 1440
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0