about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,451 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of ushers in South Dakota and the second variable is Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2011, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of ushers in South Dakota increased, so did the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. It turns out, the ushers' superior skills in directing people to their seats translated seamlessly to efficiently guiding climbers along their treacherous routes. Their expertise in crowd control also reduced bottlenecks on the mountain, leading to smoother ascents. Plus, their knack for handling unexpected situations came in handy when dealing with the ever-changing mountain conditions. It just goes to show, when it comes to reaching new heights, having the right ushers can make all the difference!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create a surreal, dream-like image in the style of scalar art where Mount Rushmore in South Dakota corresponds to Mount Everest, and a line of ushers gradually diminishes at the base. As the line shortens, visualize fewer people being available to guide aspiring climbers, causing a decline in successful summit achievements. Let the diminishing presence of ushers convey the feeling of diminished support and motivation for the climbers. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Cutsy art illustration Scalar art Psychedelic 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: Scalar art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs, in the following situation: As the number of ushers in South Dakota decreases, there are fewer people available to "usher" in a new era of successful mountaineers, leading to a decline in Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. This could be due to a lack of "support" for aspiring climbers or a shortage of individuals to "guide" them to the summit. Additionally, without enough ushers, potential climbers may not feel as "aisled" or motivated to conquer the peak, ultimately resulting in a "seating" problem for achieving successful ascents.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In South Dakota, the number of ushers at the base of Mount Rushmore gradually diminishes. As the line of ushers shortens, there are fewer people available to welcome and guide aspiring climbers to the summit of Mount Everest. This leads to a decline in the total number of successful ascents. Without enough ushers, the climbers feel less supported and motivated, causing a noticeable decrease in successful summit achievements.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Scalar art ] and depicting this scene: In South Dakota, the number of ushers at the base of Mount Rushmore gradually diminishes. As the line of ushers shortens, there are fewer people available to welcome and guide aspiring climbers to the summit of Mount Everest. This leads to a decline in the total number of successful ascents. Without enough ushers, the climbers feel less supported and motivated, causing a noticeable decrease in successful summit achievements. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create a surreal, dream-like image in the style of scalar art where Mount Rushmore in South Dakota corresponds to Mount Everest, and a line of ushers gradually diminishes at the base. As the line shortens, visualize fewer people being available to guide aspiring climbers, causing a decline in successful summit achievements. Let the diminishing presence of ushers convey the feeling of diminished support and motivation for the climbers.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of ushers in South Dakota positively influenced Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?

The Journal of Mountainous Statistical Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and CBC to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and p < 0.05 for 2003 to 2011.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to the number of ushers and the total successful Mount Everest climbs, you might think there's no connection, but our research begs to differ. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, our team embarked on an unconventional journey to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly unrelated variables. To our surprise (and delight), we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2011. In simpler terms, there appears to be a statistical relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. Whether it's the altitude or the attitude of the ushers, our findings spark curiosity and raise more questions than they answer. So, the next time you're scaling a summit or attending a show in South Dakota, don't forget to nod to the ushers – they might just be the unsung heroes of mountain conquests!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to the number of ushers and the total successful Mount Everest climbs, you might think there's no connection, but our research begs to differ. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, our team embarked on an unconventional journey to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly unrelated variables. To our surprise (and delight), we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2011. In simpler terms, there appears to be a statistical relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. Whether it's the altitude or the attitude of the ushers, our findings spark curiosity and raise more questions than they answer. So, the next time you're scaling a summit or attending a show in South Dakota, don't forget to nod to the ushers – they might just be the unsung heroes of mountain conquests!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss? Sounds like the title of a Hollywood blockbuster, doesn't it? While our research doesn't involve any action heroes or dramatic mountaineering scenes, it certainly delves into an unexpected correlation between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total successful Mount Everest climbs. We've gone from checking tickets at the theater to scaling the heights of statistical analysis – and the view from up here is quite intriguing.

You might be thinking, "What on earth do ushers in South Dakota have to do with intrepid adventurers conquering the world's highest peak?" Trust us, we had similar questions when we embarked on this journey of statistical discovery. But as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction, and we've stumbled upon some eyebrow-raising connections that will make you rethink the role of unlikely variables in shaping remarkable outcomes.

The folks at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation probably didn't expect their data to collide in such a way, but here we are, ready to peel back the curtain on this quirky association. So, buckle up and get ready to traverse the fascinating intersection of South Dakota ushers and Mount Everest triumphs. As we unravel this peculiar correlation, be prepared for a few surprises, some statistical acrobatics, and a healthy dose of mountain-themed humor along the way. After all, who said academic research can't have a dash of adventure?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to the number of ushers and the total successful Mount Everest climbs, you might think there's no connection, but our research begs to differ. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, our team embarked on an unconventional journey to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly unrelated variables. To our surprise (and delight), we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2011. In simpler terms, there appears to be a statistical relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. Whether it's the altitude or the attitude of the ushers, our findings spark curiosity and raise more questions than they answer. So, the next time you're scaling a summit or attending a show in South Dakota, don't forget to nod to the ushers – they might just be the unsung heroes of mountain conquests!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss? Sounds like the title of a Hollywood blockbuster, doesn't it? While our research doesn't involve any action heroes or dramatic mountaineering scenes, it certainly delves into an unexpected correlation between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total successful Mount Everest climbs. We've gone from checking tickets at the theater to scaling the heights of statistical analysis – and the view from up here is quite intriguing.
You might be thinking, "What on earth do ushers in South Dakota have to do with intrepid adventurers conquering the world's highest peak?" Trust us, we had similar questions when we embarked on this journey of statistical discovery. But as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction, and we've stumbled upon some eyebrow-raising connections that will make you rethink the role of unlikely variables in shaping remarkable outcomes.
The folks at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation probably didn't expect their data to collide in such a way, but here we are, ready to peel back the curtain on this quirky association. So, buckle up and get ready to traverse the fascinating intersection of South Dakota ushers and Mount Everest triumphs. As we unravel this peculiar correlation, be prepared for a few surprises, some statistical acrobatics, and a healthy dose of mountain-themed humor along the way. After all, who said academic research can't have a dash of adventure?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the study by Smith et al. (2010), "The Impact of Ushers on Audience Satisfaction," the authors find that the presence of ushers in a performance venue can influence the overall experience of patrons. The study examines the role of ushers in managing crowd behavior, ensuring safety, and providing assistance to attendees. While the connection to Mount Everest may seem dubious at first glance, the idea of guidance and support offered by ushers could potentially extend to the realm of mountain climbing, albeit in a metaphorical sense.

Doe and Jones (2015) explored "Factors Affecting Successful Mountain Expeditions," shedding light on various elements contributing to the triumph of climbers in rigorous conditions. While their focus primarily encompasses physical preparation, equipment, and team dynamics, we cannot dismiss the possibility of a subtle, yet impactful role of ushers from South Dakota in the background.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "Peak Performance: Success in High-Stakes Environments" by Brad Stulberg and Steve Magness, offers insights into the psychology of peak performance, a relevant consideration for both performance venues and high-altitude endeavors. Additionally, in "Into Thin Air" by Jon Krakauer, the harrowing tale of a Mount Everest expedition prompts reflection on the significance of support systems when facing monumental challenges.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Hobbit" presents an unlikely band of companions navigating treacherous terrain with the assistance of allies who come from unexpected places. Similarly, in John Krakauer's "Eiger Dreams," the stories of mountain adventures highlight the unanticipated ways in which individuals contribute to the success of ambitious undertakings.

In a rather unorthodox approach to our research, we delved into a variety of sources, including grocery lists, pigeon messages, and even analyzed the inkblots from the coffee stains on our office desk. While the relevance of these unconventional sources may be questionable, one must not underestimate the potential for serendipitous discoveries in unexpected places – perhaps this is the essence of the usher-Everest conundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and CBC . You used data from 2003 to 2011

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to the number of ushers and the total successful Mount Everest climbs, you might think there's no connection, but our research begs to differ. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, our team embarked on an unconventional journey to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly unrelated variables. To our surprise (and delight), we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2011. In simpler terms, there appears to be a statistical relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. Whether it's the altitude or the attitude of the ushers, our findings spark curiosity and raise more questions than they answer. So, the next time you're scaling a summit or attending a show in South Dakota, don't forget to nod to the ushers – they might just be the unsung heroes of mountain conquests!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss? Sounds like the title of a Hollywood blockbuster, doesn't it? While our research doesn't involve any action heroes or dramatic mountaineering scenes, it certainly delves into an unexpected correlation between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total successful Mount Everest climbs. We've gone from checking tickets at the theater to scaling the heights of statistical analysis – and the view from up here is quite intriguing.
You might be thinking, "What on earth do ushers in South Dakota have to do with intrepid adventurers conquering the world's highest peak?" Trust us, we had similar questions when we embarked on this journey of statistical discovery. But as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction, and we've stumbled upon some eyebrow-raising connections that will make you rethink the role of unlikely variables in shaping remarkable outcomes.
The folks at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation probably didn't expect their data to collide in such a way, but here we are, ready to peel back the curtain on this quirky association. So, buckle up and get ready to traverse the fascinating intersection of South Dakota ushers and Mount Everest triumphs. As we unravel this peculiar correlation, be prepared for a few surprises, some statistical acrobatics, and a healthy dose of mountain-themed humor along the way. After all, who said academic research can't have a dash of adventure?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic link between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey that involved equal parts number-crunching and unanticipated chuckles. The journey began with data collection from varying sources, primarily relying on the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation. After sifting through countless digits and figures, we concocted a methodology that was as quirky as the connection we sought to scrutinize.

Firstly, we established a comprehensive database of usher employment in South Dakota from 2003 to 2011, utilizing statistics that were as reliable as a seasoned theater usher guiding patrons to their seats. With rigorous attention to detail, we charted the annual fluctuations in the number of ushers, accounting for any blips that might have perturbed the usual ushering trend (did someone say an usher strike in Sioux Falls?).

On the other end of the spectrum, we delved into the mountaineering world, tapping into the data trove provided by the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation. Here, statistics were as unpredictable as a blizzard on Everest, but we braved the numerical avalanche and meticulously documented the total successful climbs of the world's highest peak for the same period.

In a leap of statistical faith, we then deployed a novel approach to analyze the relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. Utilizing advanced regression techniques and a touch of statistical alchemy, we uncovered a correlation coefficient that bore enough weight to raise an eyebrow or two. After all, 0.7650728 is not your standard coefficient – it's almost as intriguing as finding a snowman atop Everest.

Lastly, to lend credibility to our findings, we subjected the obtained results to rigorous hypothesis testing, scrutinizing the statistical significance with a fervor akin to an Everest climber navigating the treacherous Khumbu Icefall.

With our data sleuthing and statistical gymnastics complete, we emerged on the other side with a newfound appreciation for the unexpected connections that statistical analysis can unearth. Our journey may have been filled with more plot twists than a gripping movie, but we stand by our methodology as a robust and engaging means to uncover the peculiar correlation between South Dakota ushers and Mount Everest triumphs.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and CBC .

For the time period 2003 to 2011, you found a correlation 0.7650728, r-squared of 0.5853364, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to the number of ushers and the total successful Mount Everest climbs, you might think there's no connection, but our research begs to differ. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, our team embarked on an unconventional journey to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly unrelated variables. To our surprise (and delight), we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2011. In simpler terms, there appears to be a statistical relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. Whether it's the altitude or the attitude of the ushers, our findings spark curiosity and raise more questions than they answer. So, the next time you're scaling a summit or attending a show in South Dakota, don't forget to nod to the ushers – they might just be the unsung heroes of mountain conquests!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss? Sounds like the title of a Hollywood blockbuster, doesn't it? While our research doesn't involve any action heroes or dramatic mountaineering scenes, it certainly delves into an unexpected correlation between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total successful Mount Everest climbs. We've gone from checking tickets at the theater to scaling the heights of statistical analysis – and the view from up here is quite intriguing.
You might be thinking, "What on earth do ushers in South Dakota have to do with intrepid adventurers conquering the world's highest peak?" Trust us, we had similar questions when we embarked on this journey of statistical discovery. But as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction, and we've stumbled upon some eyebrow-raising connections that will make you rethink the role of unlikely variables in shaping remarkable outcomes.
The folks at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation probably didn't expect their data to collide in such a way, but here we are, ready to peel back the curtain on this quirky association. So, buckle up and get ready to traverse the fascinating intersection of South Dakota ushers and Mount Everest triumphs. As we unravel this peculiar correlation, be prepared for a few surprises, some statistical acrobatics, and a healthy dose of mountain-themed humor along the way. After all, who said academic research can't have a dash of adventure?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our quest to uncover the mysterious link between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, we were met with astonishment and a healthy dose of amusement. As we crunched the numbers from 2003 to 2011, we stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728, an r-squared of 0.5853364, and a p-value lower than the famed 0.05 threshold.

But what does this all mean? Are the ushers of South Dakota secretly guiding climbers to their summit successes, or is there a deeper statistical dance at play? Enter Fig. 1, our trusty scatterplot, which vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. It's a plot twist even the most seasoned mountaineers wouldn't see coming.

Our findings suggest that there is more to the usher's role than meets the eye. Whether it's the Midwestern charm or a knack for elevating spirits (pun intended), the statistical relationship between these variables raises as many questions as it answers. Could it be that the calming presence of an usher in South Dakota inadvertently emboldens climbers thousands of miles away? We can't say for certain, but the statistical evidence has certainly left us contemplating the uncharted territories of variable influence.

So, the next time you find yourself navigating the rugged terrain of statistical analysis, remember the unlikely heroes – the ushers of South Dakota, silently shaping mountaineering triumphs from a world away. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, sometimes the most unexpected couplings form the grandest adventures.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to the number of ushers and the total successful Mount Everest climbs, you might think there's no connection, but our research begs to differ. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, our team embarked on an unconventional journey to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly unrelated variables. To our surprise (and delight), we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2011. In simpler terms, there appears to be a statistical relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. Whether it's the altitude or the attitude of the ushers, our findings spark curiosity and raise more questions than they answer. So, the next time you're scaling a summit or attending a show in South Dakota, don't forget to nod to the ushers – they might just be the unsung heroes of mountain conquests!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the study by Smith et al. (2010), "The Impact of Ushers on Audience Satisfaction," the authors find that the presence of ushers in a performance venue can influence the overall experience of patrons. The study examines the role of ushers in managing crowd behavior, ensuring safety, and providing assistance to attendees. While the connection to Mount Everest may seem dubious at first glance, the idea of guidance and support offered by ushers could potentially extend to the realm of mountain climbing, albeit in a metaphorical sense.
Doe and Jones (2015) explored "Factors Affecting Successful Mountain Expeditions," shedding light on various elements contributing to the triumph of climbers in rigorous conditions. While their focus primarily encompasses physical preparation, equipment, and team dynamics, we cannot dismiss the possibility of a subtle, yet impactful role of ushers from South Dakota in the background.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Peak Performance: Success in High-Stakes Environments" by Brad Stulberg and Steve Magness, offers insights into the psychology of peak performance, a relevant consideration for both performance venues and high-altitude endeavors. Additionally, in "Into Thin Air" by Jon Krakauer, the harrowing tale of a Mount Everest expedition prompts reflection on the significance of support systems when facing monumental challenges.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Hobbit" presents an unlikely band of companions navigating treacherous terrain with the assistance of allies who come from unexpected places. Similarly, in John Krakauer's "Eiger Dreams," the stories of mountain adventures highlight the unanticipated ways in which individuals contribute to the success of ambitious undertakings.
In a rather unorthodox approach to our research, we delved into a variety of sources, including grocery lists, pigeon messages, and even analyzed the inkblots from the coffee stains on our office desk. While the relevance of these unconventional sources may be questionable, one must not underestimate the potential for serendipitous discoveries in unexpected places – perhaps this is the essence of the usher-Everest conundrum.

[[RESULTS]]
In our quest to uncover the mysterious link between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, we were met with astonishment and a healthy dose of amusement. As we crunched the numbers from 2003 to 2011, we stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728, an r-squared of 0.5853364, and a p-value lower than the famed 0.05 threshold.
But what does this all mean? Are the ushers of South Dakota secretly guiding climbers to their summit successes, or is there a deeper statistical dance at play? Enter Fig. 1, our trusty scatterplot, which vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. It's a plot twist even the most seasoned mountaineers wouldn't see coming.
Our findings suggest that there is more to the usher's role than meets the eye. Whether it's the Midwestern charm or a knack for elevating spirits (pun intended), the statistical relationship between these variables raises as many questions as it answers. Could it be that the calming presence of an usher in South Dakota inadvertently emboldens climbers thousands of miles away? We can't say for certain, but the statistical evidence has certainly left us contemplating the uncharted territories of variable influence.
So, the next time you find yourself navigating the rugged terrain of statistical analysis, remember the unlikely heroes – the ushers of South Dakota, silently shaping mountaineering triumphs from a world away. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, sometimes the most unexpected couplings form the grandest adventures.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have sparked curiosity and intrigue, as we uncovered a statistically significant relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs for the years 2003 to 2011. This unlikely connection between the unassuming ushers and the mighty mountain conquests mirrors the unexpected alliances found in the tales of Tolkien and Krakauer. It seems that the role of support and guidance, whether in a performance venue or on treacherous mountain slopes, cannot be underestimated.

As we harkened back to the literature review, where Smith et al. (2010) highlighted the influence of ushers on audience satisfaction, we couldn't help but ponder the metaphorical link to climbers seeking triumph on Everest. The subtle, yet impactful role of ushers from South Dakota may very well extend to the realm of mountaineering, echoing the non-fictional insights of Stulberg and Magness on peak performance and the crucial support systems portrayed in Krakauer's "Into Thin Air."

Our results further support the notion that the presence of ushers may contribute to the overall experience and success in high-stakes environments, whether it be outfitting individuals with a program at an opera house or providing invisible encouragement to brave souls scaling the earth's highest peaks. The statistical dance between ushers and Everest climbs seems to suggest that the Midwestern charm or the unknowable ways of variable influence may indeed extend across continents and altitudes.

It is important to note that the correlation we've uncovered does not imply causation, though the statistical evidence has left us pondering the uncharted territories of variable influence. The adventure continues as we contemplate whether the ushers' calming presence in South Dakota inadvertently emboldens climbers for their distant conquests. Our research opens the door to further exploration of the unseen forces at play, calling for future studies to delve deeper into the essence of this unlikely relationship.

In conclusion, while it may appear as a statistical bust at first glance, the connection between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs is not just a fuss. It's a statistical twist that leaves us marveling at the unexpected couplings found in this grand adventure of research. So, the next time you find yourself scaling summits or attending a show, remember to nod to the unsung heroes – the ushers may just hold the key to uncovering the hidden allies in our ultimate conquests.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of ushers in South Dakota and Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to the number of ushers and the total successful Mount Everest climbs, you might think there's no connection, but our research begs to differ. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, our team embarked on an unconventional journey to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly unrelated variables. To our surprise (and delight), we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2011. In simpler terms, there appears to be a statistical relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. Whether it's the altitude or the attitude of the ushers, our findings spark curiosity and raise more questions than they answer. So, the next time you're scaling a summit or attending a show in South Dakota, don't forget to nod to the ushers – they might just be the unsung heroes of mountain conquests!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss? Sounds like the title of a Hollywood blockbuster, doesn't it? While our research doesn't involve any action heroes or dramatic mountaineering scenes, it certainly delves into an unexpected correlation between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total successful Mount Everest climbs. We've gone from checking tickets at the theater to scaling the heights of statistical analysis – and the view from up here is quite intriguing.
You might be thinking, "What on earth do ushers in South Dakota have to do with intrepid adventurers conquering the world's highest peak?" Trust us, we had similar questions when we embarked on this journey of statistical discovery. But as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction, and we've stumbled upon some eyebrow-raising connections that will make you rethink the role of unlikely variables in shaping remarkable outcomes.
The folks at the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation probably didn't expect their data to collide in such a way, but here we are, ready to peel back the curtain on this quirky association. So, buckle up and get ready to traverse the fascinating intersection of South Dakota ushers and Mount Everest triumphs. As we unravel this peculiar correlation, be prepared for a few surprises, some statistical acrobatics, and a healthy dose of mountain-themed humor along the way. After all, who said academic research can't have a dash of adventure?

[[RESULTS]]
In our quest to uncover the mysterious link between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs, we were met with astonishment and a healthy dose of amusement. As we crunched the numbers from 2003 to 2011, we stumbled upon a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728, an r-squared of 0.5853364, and a p-value lower than the famed 0.05 threshold.
But what does this all mean? Are the ushers of South Dakota secretly guiding climbers to their summit successes, or is there a deeper statistical dance at play? Enter Fig. 1, our trusty scatterplot, which vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. It's a plot twist even the most seasoned mountaineers wouldn't see coming.
Our findings suggest that there is more to the usher's role than meets the eye. Whether it's the Midwestern charm or a knack for elevating spirits (pun intended), the statistical relationship between these variables raises as many questions as it answers. Could it be that the calming presence of an usher in South Dakota inadvertently emboldens climbers thousands of miles away? We can't say for certain, but the statistical evidence has certainly left us contemplating the uncharted territories of variable influence.
So, the next time you find yourself navigating the rugged terrain of statistical analysis, remember the unlikely heroes – the ushers of South Dakota, silently shaping mountaineering triumphs from a world away. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, sometimes the most unexpected couplings form the grandest adventures.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up our expedition through the wilds of statistical analysis, we can't help but marvel at the unexpected peaks and valleys we've encountered in the journey of unraveling the connection between South Dakota ushers and mighty Mount Everest triumphs. The correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 has left us as puzzled as a climber facing a surprising crevasse.

Although we've managed to shine a spotlight on this quirk of correlation, it's crucial to remember that correlation does not imply causation. While it's tempting to envision ushers in South Dakota cheerfully guiding climbers from afar, the lighthearted connection we've uncovered serves as a reminder of the delightful randomness that can emerge from statistical analysis.

In the grand theater of statistical exploration, unexpected characters like South Dakota ushers can take center stage, showcasing the whimsical nature of correlations and the uncharted territory of variable influence. So, let's tip our hats to the ushers of South Dakota, who, in the world of statistics, have proven to be unlikely heroes with a flair for infusing high-altitude adventures with a touch of statistical magic.

As for future research, perhaps it's time to let this correlation take its final bow. The curtain falls on this peculiar partnership between ushers and Everest triumphs, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the serendipitous quirks of statistical analysis. So, on this statistical stage, let's bid adieu to further exploration in this offbeat correlation – for sometimes, a statistical mystery is best left to enchant and puzzle from afar.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Mountainous Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Alpine Acoustics and Performance Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Ushers and Everest Thrust: A Statistical Bust or Just a Fuss? with an abstract of When it comes to the number of ushers and the total successful Mount Everest climbs, you might think there's no connection, but our research begs to differ. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, our team embarked on an unconventional journey to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly unrelated variables. To our surprise (and delight), we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7650728 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2011. In simpler terms, there appears to be a statistical relationship between the number of ushers in South Dakota and the total number of successful Mount Everest climbs. Whether it's the altitude or the attitude of the ushers, our findings spark curiosity and raise more questions than they answer. So, the next time you're scaling a summit or attending a show in South Dakota, don't forget to nod to the ushers – they might just be the unsung heroes of mountain conquests!

ChatGPT:

Ushers, Mount Everest climbs, statistical correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, International Mountaineering and Climbing Federation, South Dakota ushers, altitudes impact on ushers, ushers and successful summit scaling

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of ushers in South Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of ushers, lobby attendants, and ticket takers in South Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of ushers in South Dakota

Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs
Source: CBC
See what else correlates with Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs

Correlation r = 0.7650728 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5853364 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 58.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of ushers in South Dakota) over the 9 years from 2003 through 2011.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.016. 0.0163008898440357850000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.77 in 1.6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 61 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.21, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011
The number of ushers in South Dakota (Laborers)290240240330350300290310290
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs (Climbers)267337307493633423457543542




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([290,240,240,330,350,300,290,310,290,])
array_2 = np.array([267,337,307,493,633,423,457,543,542,])
array_1_name = "The number of ushers in South Dakota"
array_2_name = "Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 2451 · Black Variable ID: 14295 · Red Variable ID: 498
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0