about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,418 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO corn in Michigan grew to new heights, it unknowingly began emitting a perplexing pollen that carried a faint aura of exasperation. As people across the state came into contact with this subtly irked pollen, they found themselves inexplicably echoing the sentiments of the corn. Before they knew it, the exasperation had spread like a bewildered wave, leading to a spike in searches for 'i cant even' as the people of Michigan unwittingly channeled the inner turmoil of their genetically modified corn counterparts. Keep an ear to the stalks, for you never know what vegetal vexations may take root next!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing a striking TIME magazine cover featuring a picturesque Michigan cornfield. Within the field, genetically modified corn plants sprout with vibrant emoji-shaped kernels, standing tall under the radiant sun. Encompassing the scene are people with perplexed expressions, gazing at their smartphones with frustration evident in the tapping of their "I can't even" searches on Google. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Whimsical illustration Oragami A TIME magazine cover image Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: The GMO corn started producing kernels shaped like emojis, leading to a wave of existential confusion and inability to even.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a lush Michigan cornfield, rows of genetically modified corn plants with emoji-shaped kernels stand tall under the bright sun. Surrounding the field, people stand with perplexed expressions gazing at their smartphones, their frustrated fingers tapping out "I can't even" searches on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a lush Michigan cornfield, rows of genetically modified corn plants with emoji-shaped kernels stand tall under the bright sun. Surrounding the field, people stand with perplexed expressions gazing at their smartphones, their frustrated fingers tapping out "I can't even" searches on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing a striking TIME magazine cover featuring a picturesque Michigan cornfield. Within the field, genetically modified corn plants sprout with vibrant emoji-shaped kernels, standing tall under the radiant sun. Encompassing the scene are people with perplexed expressions, gazing at their smartphones with frustration evident in the tapping of their "I can't even" searches on Google.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Michigan caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this corny yet kernel of truth-seeking study, we examine the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we planted the seed of this investigation and found a surprising and humorous connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

It appears that there is indeed a corn-nection (pun intended) between the cultivation of GMO corn and individuals' exasperation as manifested through their internet searches. This study unveils the comical yet thought-provoking association, raising questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human sentiment and expression. Join us in this ear-resistible journey through the corn fields of correlation and causation, sprinkled with a-maize-ing research findings and a hint of dad humor.

As a corny aside, it seems that the GMO corn may be "ear-resistible" not only in the agricultural sense, but also in tapping into collective exasperation. This research not only kernels the interest of scholars and readers alike but also pops the question: could GMO corn be a-maize-ing stress relievers after all?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this corny yet kernel of truth-seeking study, we examine the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we planted the seed of this investigation and found a surprising and humorous connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

It appears that there is indeed a corn-nection (pun intended) between the cultivation of GMO corn and individuals' exasperation as manifested through their internet searches. This study unveils the comical yet thought-provoking association, raising questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human sentiment and expression. Join us in this ear-resistible journey through the corn fields of correlation and causation, sprinkled with a-maize-ing research findings and a hint of dad humor.

As a corny aside, it seems that the GMO corn may be "ear-resistible" not only in the agricultural sense, but also in tapping into collective exasperation. This research not only kernels the interest of scholars and readers alike but also pops the question: could GMO corn be a-maize-ing stress relievers after all?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and their potential impact on human behavior and sentiment has been a subject of growing interest and debate in recent years. With the prevalence of GMO usage in crop production, particularly in the cultivation of corn, attention has turned to exploring the broader implications of GMOs beyond their intended agricultural benefits. In this context, our investigation emerges, shedding light on the curiously captivating correlation between GMO corn and the expression of exasperation as observed through Google searches for the phrase "I can't even."

As the saying goes, “Why was the corn feeling lonely? Because it was a little husk-pressed!” Nevertheless, despite the humorous backdrop of our research, the implications of our findings may prove to be no laughing matter. The potential influence of GMOs on human emotions and behaviors is a matter deserving of thorough examination, which we set out to address in this study.

Our journey into the cornfields of research was initiated by a curiosity as stirring as a kernel on a hot stove - a curiosity that eventually led us to uncover a surprising correlation. Our research aims to not only present the statistical association between GMO corn cultivation and the "I can't even" internet searches but also to provide a deeper understanding of the factors underlying this intriguing relationship.

In line with the nature of our investigation, we recognize the significance of addressing this topic in a manner that is both scientifically rigorous and entertaining. Integrating quantitative analysis with a touch of levity, we endeavor to bring to light the unexpected and amusing aspects of our findings, contributing to the scholarly discourse in a manner that is both engaging and insightful.

As we delve into the heart of our investigation, it becomes apparent that there is more to GMO corn than meets the eye – or the ear, for that matter. From a statistical standpoint, our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient along with robust statistical significance, inviting further exploration into the potential implications for public sentiment and well-being.

Should you be wondering "What did one ear of corn say to the other ear of corn? Don't look now, but I think someone is stalking us" - you are not alone. This lighthearted side to our research, however, should not overshadow the serious implications and thought-provoking questions that arise from the intriguing relationship we have unveiled. Join us as we peel back the husk of this curious correlation and sift through the kernels of insight it offers, all the while keeping an ‘ear’ out for the unexpected twists and turns that come with exploring the intersection of GMOs and human expression.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this corny yet kernel of truth-seeking study, we examine the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we planted the seed of this investigation and found a surprising and humorous connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

It appears that there is indeed a corn-nection (pun intended) between the cultivation of GMO corn and individuals' exasperation as manifested through their internet searches. This study unveils the comical yet thought-provoking association, raising questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human sentiment and expression. Join us in this ear-resistible journey through the corn fields of correlation and causation, sprinkled with a-maize-ing research findings and a hint of dad humor.

As a corny aside, it seems that the GMO corn may be "ear-resistible" not only in the agricultural sense, but also in tapping into collective exasperation. This research not only kernels the interest of scholars and readers alike but also pops the question: could GMO corn be a-maize-ing stress relievers after all?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and their potential impact on human behavior and sentiment has been a subject of growing interest and debate in recent years. With the prevalence of GMO usage in crop production, particularly in the cultivation of corn, attention has turned to exploring the broader implications of GMOs beyond their intended agricultural benefits. In this context, our investigation emerges, shedding light on the curiously captivating correlation between GMO corn and the expression of exasperation as observed through Google searches for the phrase "I can't even."
As the saying goes, “Why was the corn feeling lonely? Because it was a little husk-pressed!” Nevertheless, despite the humorous backdrop of our research, the implications of our findings may prove to be no laughing matter. The potential influence of GMOs on human emotions and behaviors is a matter deserving of thorough examination, which we set out to address in this study.
Our journey into the cornfields of research was initiated by a curiosity as stirring as a kernel on a hot stove - a curiosity that eventually led us to uncover a surprising correlation. Our research aims to not only present the statistical association between GMO corn cultivation and the "I can't even" internet searches but also to provide a deeper understanding of the factors underlying this intriguing relationship.
In line with the nature of our investigation, we recognize the significance of addressing this topic in a manner that is both scientifically rigorous and entertaining. Integrating quantitative analysis with a touch of levity, we endeavor to bring to light the unexpected and amusing aspects of our findings, contributing to the scholarly discourse in a manner that is both engaging and insightful.
As we delve into the heart of our investigation, it becomes apparent that there is more to GMO corn than meets the eye – or the ear, for that matter. From a statistical standpoint, our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient along with robust statistical significance, inviting further exploration into the potential implications for public sentiment and well-being.
Should you be wondering "What did one ear of corn say to the other ear of corn? Don't look now, but I think someone is stalking us" - you are not alone. This lighthearted side to our research, however, should not overshadow the serious implications and thought-provoking questions that arise from the intriguing relationship we have unveiled. Join us as we peel back the husk of this curious correlation and sift through the kernels of insight it offers, all the while keeping an ‘ear’ out for the unexpected twists and turns that come with exploring the intersection of GMOs and human expression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we embark on this journey into the peculiar yet captivating correlation between GMO corn and the expression of exasperation as observed through Google searches for the phrase "I can't even," it is essential to ground our investigation in the existing literature and research findings in this domain. In "Smith et al.'s study, it was found that GMO corn cultivation exhibited a notable impact on agricultural productivity and pest resistance, providing valuable insights into the potential benefits of genetically modified crops in the agricultural sector," which sets the stage for further exploration into the unintended consequences and implications of GMO usage.

Furthermore, Doe and Jones (20XX) highlight the economic implications of GMO corn cultivation, emphasizing its influence on market prices and trade dynamics within the agricultural sector. "In their work, it was demonstrated that GMO corn cultivation has reshaped the landscape of corn production, contributing to shifts in supply and demand dynamics," shedding light on the multifaceted impact of GMOs beyond their immediate agricultural effects.

However, as we move from the serious research into more light-hearted exploration, we turn our attention to non-fiction books that offer insight into the world of corn, agriculture, and human behavior. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides an in-depth exploration of modern agricultural practices, while "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser delves into the broader societal implications of food production, offering valuable context for our investigation.

From the realm of fiction, "The Corn Maiden and Other Nightmares" by Joyce Carol Oates captivates readers with its captivating and unsettling stories, perhaps drawing parallels to the unexpected and thought-provoking nature of our research findings. In a similar vein, "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King introduces a fictional world where corn fields become a source of horror and intrigue, mirroring the surprising twists and turns that emerge from our study.

Additionally, the animated series "Corn & Peg" brings a playful and charming portrayal of two spirited and enterprising young horses, resonating with the lighthearted yet diligent approach we have taken in unraveling the mysteries of GMO corn and internet searches. Furthermore, the timeless animated classic "Peppa Pig" reminds us to approach our research with a sense of humor and curiosity, inviting us to ponder the unexpected connections that may arise from seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In summary, our exploration into the connection between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for "I can't even" transcends the boundaries of conventional research, offering a kernel of humor and insight into the fascinating interplay between agricultural practices and human expression. Join us as we navigate this uncharted territory, equipped with statistical rigor and a dash of whimsy, in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between GMO corn and collective exasperation. And remember, when it comes to our research, there's always "mays" to the madness!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this corny yet kernel of truth-seeking study, we examine the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we planted the seed of this investigation and found a surprising and humorous connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

It appears that there is indeed a corn-nection (pun intended) between the cultivation of GMO corn and individuals' exasperation as manifested through their internet searches. This study unveils the comical yet thought-provoking association, raising questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human sentiment and expression. Join us in this ear-resistible journey through the corn fields of correlation and causation, sprinkled with a-maize-ing research findings and a hint of dad humor.

As a corny aside, it seems that the GMO corn may be "ear-resistible" not only in the agricultural sense, but also in tapping into collective exasperation. This research not only kernels the interest of scholars and readers alike but also pops the question: could GMO corn be a-maize-ing stress relievers after all?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and their potential impact on human behavior and sentiment has been a subject of growing interest and debate in recent years. With the prevalence of GMO usage in crop production, particularly in the cultivation of corn, attention has turned to exploring the broader implications of GMOs beyond their intended agricultural benefits. In this context, our investigation emerges, shedding light on the curiously captivating correlation between GMO corn and the expression of exasperation as observed through Google searches for the phrase "I can't even."
As the saying goes, “Why was the corn feeling lonely? Because it was a little husk-pressed!” Nevertheless, despite the humorous backdrop of our research, the implications of our findings may prove to be no laughing matter. The potential influence of GMOs on human emotions and behaviors is a matter deserving of thorough examination, which we set out to address in this study.
Our journey into the cornfields of research was initiated by a curiosity as stirring as a kernel on a hot stove - a curiosity that eventually led us to uncover a surprising correlation. Our research aims to not only present the statistical association between GMO corn cultivation and the "I can't even" internet searches but also to provide a deeper understanding of the factors underlying this intriguing relationship.
In line with the nature of our investigation, we recognize the significance of addressing this topic in a manner that is both scientifically rigorous and entertaining. Integrating quantitative analysis with a touch of levity, we endeavor to bring to light the unexpected and amusing aspects of our findings, contributing to the scholarly discourse in a manner that is both engaging and insightful.
As we delve into the heart of our investigation, it becomes apparent that there is more to GMO corn than meets the eye – or the ear, for that matter. From a statistical standpoint, our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient along with robust statistical significance, inviting further exploration into the potential implications for public sentiment and well-being.
Should you be wondering "What did one ear of corn say to the other ear of corn? Don't look now, but I think someone is stalking us" - you are not alone. This lighthearted side to our research, however, should not overshadow the serious implications and thought-provoking questions that arise from the intriguing relationship we have unveiled. Join us as we peel back the husk of this curious correlation and sift through the kernels of insight it offers, all the while keeping an ‘ear’ out for the unexpected twists and turns that come with exploring the intersection of GMOs and human expression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the corny correlation between GMO corn and "I can't even" Google searches, we designed a methodological framework as robust and captivating as a summer corn maze. Our investigation spanned the years 2004 to 2023, during which we meticulously harvested data from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service and Google Trends. With kernels of data in hand, we proceeded to analyze and scrutinize the relationship with the precision of a farmer selecting the choicest ears of corn from the field.

The first step of our analysis involved extracting annual data on the production and prevalence of GMO corn in the state of Michigan. This information was gleaned from reports issued by the USDA, providing us with a comprehensive understanding of the extent to which GMO corn had taken root in the state over the years. Much like a farmer tending to their crop, we nurtured this data, ensuring that it flourished under the watchful eye of statistical scrutiny.

Turning our attention to the realm of internet searches, we tapped into the bountiful yield of Google Trends to track the frequency of searches for the phrase "I can't even" originating from the state of Michigan. This rich harvest of digital expressions of exasperation served as the raw material for our investigation, allowing us to glean insights into the ebb and flow of exasperated sentiments across the years.

In a pun-derful twist, our data collection process mirrored the process of tending to a cornfield – carefully gathering insights from the fertile soil of the internet, analogous to tilling the digital landscape for hidden kernels of truth. Just as a farmer might rely on the ever-changing weather patterns to guide their decisions, we navigated the fluctuations in search trends to sow the seeds of our analysis, hoping to reap a harvest of meaningful statistical associations.

With these two sets of data in hand, we employed a comprehensive array of statistical techniques to plough through the soil of our findings. Our analysis included time series modeling to discern temporal patterns and trends, as well as sophisticated regression methods to unearth the nuanced relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. The rigorous nature of our statistical approach ensured that our findings were as robust as a stalk of corn standing tall amidst the winds of statistical uncertainty.

As a lighthearted nod to the whimsical nature of our investigation, we sought to infuse our methodological approach with a touch of humor, aiming to make the scholarly process as engaging as a corny joke around the dinner table. Just as a sprinkle of salt adds flavor to a dish, the inclusion of humorous asides and puns injected an element of levity into the otherwise weighty world of statistical analysis, reminding us that even the most complex research can benefit from a dash of lightheartedness.

Our methodology, much like an ear of corn, may appear simple on the surface, but beneath lies a complex interplay of methodological techniques and data-driven insights, laboriously husked and scrutinized to ensure the highest standards of statistical rigor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9181824, r-squared of 0.8430588, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this corny yet kernel of truth-seeking study, we examine the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we planted the seed of this investigation and found a surprising and humorous connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

It appears that there is indeed a corn-nection (pun intended) between the cultivation of GMO corn and individuals' exasperation as manifested through their internet searches. This study unveils the comical yet thought-provoking association, raising questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human sentiment and expression. Join us in this ear-resistible journey through the corn fields of correlation and causation, sprinkled with a-maize-ing research findings and a hint of dad humor.

As a corny aside, it seems that the GMO corn may be "ear-resistible" not only in the agricultural sense, but also in tapping into collective exasperation. This research not only kernels the interest of scholars and readers alike but also pops the question: could GMO corn be a-maize-ing stress relievers after all?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and their potential impact on human behavior and sentiment has been a subject of growing interest and debate in recent years. With the prevalence of GMO usage in crop production, particularly in the cultivation of corn, attention has turned to exploring the broader implications of GMOs beyond their intended agricultural benefits. In this context, our investigation emerges, shedding light on the curiously captivating correlation between GMO corn and the expression of exasperation as observed through Google searches for the phrase "I can't even."
As the saying goes, “Why was the corn feeling lonely? Because it was a little husk-pressed!” Nevertheless, despite the humorous backdrop of our research, the implications of our findings may prove to be no laughing matter. The potential influence of GMOs on human emotions and behaviors is a matter deserving of thorough examination, which we set out to address in this study.
Our journey into the cornfields of research was initiated by a curiosity as stirring as a kernel on a hot stove - a curiosity that eventually led us to uncover a surprising correlation. Our research aims to not only present the statistical association between GMO corn cultivation and the "I can't even" internet searches but also to provide a deeper understanding of the factors underlying this intriguing relationship.
In line with the nature of our investigation, we recognize the significance of addressing this topic in a manner that is both scientifically rigorous and entertaining. Integrating quantitative analysis with a touch of levity, we endeavor to bring to light the unexpected and amusing aspects of our findings, contributing to the scholarly discourse in a manner that is both engaging and insightful.
As we delve into the heart of our investigation, it becomes apparent that there is more to GMO corn than meets the eye – or the ear, for that matter. From a statistical standpoint, our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient along with robust statistical significance, inviting further exploration into the potential implications for public sentiment and well-being.
Should you be wondering "What did one ear of corn say to the other ear of corn? Don't look now, but I think someone is stalking us" - you are not alone. This lighthearted side to our research, however, should not overshadow the serious implications and thought-provoking questions that arise from the intriguing relationship we have unveiled. Join us as we peel back the husk of this curious correlation and sift through the kernels of insight it offers, all the while keeping an ‘ear’ out for the unexpected twists and turns that come with exploring the intersection of GMOs and human expression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data concerning the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even" unveiled a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023. This correlation was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.8430588, indicating that approximately 84% of the variation in "I can't even" searches could be explained by the variation in GMO corn use.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) graphically depicts the strong positive correlation between GMO corn usage and the frequency of Google searches for "I can't even." It is both aesthetically pleasing and statistically significant, which is quite a-maize-ing, to say the least!

Our findings not only kernel the interest of researchers and readers but also pop the question of whether GMO corn could indeed be a-maize-ing stress relievers. This presents a cornundrum of whether GMO corn's influence reaches beyond the agricultural fields into the realm of human sentiment and expression.

In summary, our study uncovers a compelling and unexpectedly comical association, shedding light on the potential impact of GMO corn on human emotion and communication. It tantalizingly beckons further research into the mechanisms underlying this correlation and serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of the interplay between agricultural practices and human behavior.

As Albert Einstein once said, "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." And in the same train of thought, who would have known that GMO corn's education might extend beyond farming to influence human emotional expression? It seems there's much to learn from the fields of corn and the queries of Google searches.

Additionally, it encourages scholars to approach research with an open mind and a willingness to explore unexpected phenomena, much like stumbling upon a corny joke in the midst of a serious academic paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this corny yet kernel of truth-seeking study, we examine the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we planted the seed of this investigation and found a surprising and humorous connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

It appears that there is indeed a corn-nection (pun intended) between the cultivation of GMO corn and individuals' exasperation as manifested through their internet searches. This study unveils the comical yet thought-provoking association, raising questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human sentiment and expression. Join us in this ear-resistible journey through the corn fields of correlation and causation, sprinkled with a-maize-ing research findings and a hint of dad humor.

As a corny aside, it seems that the GMO corn may be "ear-resistible" not only in the agricultural sense, but also in tapping into collective exasperation. This research not only kernels the interest of scholars and readers alike but also pops the question: could GMO corn be a-maize-ing stress relievers after all?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we embark on this journey into the peculiar yet captivating correlation between GMO corn and the expression of exasperation as observed through Google searches for the phrase "I can't even," it is essential to ground our investigation in the existing literature and research findings in this domain. In "Smith et al.'s study, it was found that GMO corn cultivation exhibited a notable impact on agricultural productivity and pest resistance, providing valuable insights into the potential benefits of genetically modified crops in the agricultural sector," which sets the stage for further exploration into the unintended consequences and implications of GMO usage.
Furthermore, Doe and Jones (20XX) highlight the economic implications of GMO corn cultivation, emphasizing its influence on market prices and trade dynamics within the agricultural sector. "In their work, it was demonstrated that GMO corn cultivation has reshaped the landscape of corn production, contributing to shifts in supply and demand dynamics," shedding light on the multifaceted impact of GMOs beyond their immediate agricultural effects.
However, as we move from the serious research into more light-hearted exploration, we turn our attention to non-fiction books that offer insight into the world of corn, agriculture, and human behavior. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides an in-depth exploration of modern agricultural practices, while "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser delves into the broader societal implications of food production, offering valuable context for our investigation.
From the realm of fiction, "The Corn Maiden and Other Nightmares" by Joyce Carol Oates captivates readers with its captivating and unsettling stories, perhaps drawing parallels to the unexpected and thought-provoking nature of our research findings. In a similar vein, "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King introduces a fictional world where corn fields become a source of horror and intrigue, mirroring the surprising twists and turns that emerge from our study.
Additionally, the animated series "Corn & Peg" brings a playful and charming portrayal of two spirited and enterprising young horses, resonating with the lighthearted yet diligent approach we have taken in unraveling the mysteries of GMO corn and internet searches. Furthermore, the timeless animated classic "Peppa Pig" reminds us to approach our research with a sense of humor and curiosity, inviting us to ponder the unexpected connections that may arise from seemingly unrelated phenomena.
In summary, our exploration into the connection between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for "I can't even" transcends the boundaries of conventional research, offering a kernel of humor and insight into the fascinating interplay between agricultural practices and human expression. Join us as we navigate this uncharted territory, equipped with statistical rigor and a dash of whimsy, in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between GMO corn and collective exasperation. And remember, when it comes to our research, there's always "mays" to the madness!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data concerning the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even" unveiled a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023. This correlation was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.8430588, indicating that approximately 84% of the variation in "I can't even" searches could be explained by the variation in GMO corn use.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) graphically depicts the strong positive correlation between GMO corn usage and the frequency of Google searches for "I can't even." It is both aesthetically pleasing and statistically significant, which is quite a-maize-ing, to say the least!
Our findings not only kernel the interest of researchers and readers but also pop the question of whether GMO corn could indeed be a-maize-ing stress relievers. This presents a cornundrum of whether GMO corn's influence reaches beyond the agricultural fields into the realm of human sentiment and expression.
In summary, our study uncovers a compelling and unexpectedly comical association, shedding light on the potential impact of GMO corn on human emotion and communication. It tantalizingly beckons further research into the mechanisms underlying this correlation and serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of the interplay between agricultural practices and human behavior.
As Albert Einstein once said, "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." And in the same train of thought, who would have known that GMO corn's education might extend beyond farming to influence human emotional expression? It seems there's much to learn from the fields of corn and the queries of Google searches.
Additionally, it encourages scholars to approach research with an open mind and a willingness to explore unexpected phenomena, much like stumbling upon a corny joke in the midst of a serious academic paper.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study present a-maize-ing insight into the seemingly unconventional and quirky connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Our results substantially corroborate the existing research by elucidating a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 over the period from 2004 to 2023, which supports the prior research suggesting the influence of GMO corn on agricultural productivity, market dynamics, and potentially human sentiment and expression.

The robust correlation uncovered in our investigation not only pops the cornundrum of unexpected associations but also echoes the musings of previous scholars. As Smith et al. (20XX) demonstrated the impact of GMO corn cultivation on agricultural productivity, our findings extend this understanding to unveil an unforeseen kernel of truth – the potential influence of GMO corn on human emotional expression. This revelation affirms the multifaceted nature of GMO usage and its impact on various aspects of human life, heralding a new ear-a in the understanding of agricultural technology's potential ramifications.

It's worth recalling that as we delved into non-fiction and fictional works related to agriculture and human behavior in our literature review, particularly the whimsical "Corn & Peg" and the captivating yet unsettling stories in "The Corn Maiden and Other Nightmares," our study has embraced both the serious and lighthearted aspects of research. This multidimensional approach has allowed us to uncover a correlation that is as intriguing as uncovering a corny dad joke at an academic conference.

Our findings present a cornucopia of possibilities for future research, inviting scholars to ponder the unexpected connections that may arise from seemingly unrelated phenomena. This is reminiscent of the surprise and delight of stumbling upon a clever dad joke in the midst of a serious academic paper. The unexpected hilarity and profound insight that stem from our research underscore the importance of approaching scientific inquiry with both rigor and a touch of whimsy, much like finding a corny pun nestled within a serious discussion of GMO corn and Google searches.

In conclusion, our study opens an ear-ily captivating window into the world of GMO corn and collective exasperation, leaving scholars and readers alike pondering the a-maize-ing interplay between agricultural practices and human communication. It is a reminder that in the often-stern domain of academic research, there is always room for a-maize-ing discoveries and a well-placed chuckle or two. For as the ancient proverb goes, "Where there's a-maize-ment, there's room for discovery and laughter."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this corny yet kernel of truth-seeking study, we examine the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we planted the seed of this investigation and found a surprising and humorous connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.

It appears that there is indeed a corn-nection (pun intended) between the cultivation of GMO corn and individuals' exasperation as manifested through their internet searches. This study unveils the comical yet thought-provoking association, raising questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human sentiment and expression. Join us in this ear-resistible journey through the corn fields of correlation and causation, sprinkled with a-maize-ing research findings and a hint of dad humor.

As a corny aside, it seems that the GMO corn may be "ear-resistible" not only in the agricultural sense, but also in tapping into collective exasperation. This research not only kernels the interest of scholars and readers alike but also pops the question: could GMO corn be a-maize-ing stress relievers after all?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture and their potential impact on human behavior and sentiment has been a subject of growing interest and debate in recent years. With the prevalence of GMO usage in crop production, particularly in the cultivation of corn, attention has turned to exploring the broader implications of GMOs beyond their intended agricultural benefits. In this context, our investigation emerges, shedding light on the curiously captivating correlation between GMO corn and the expression of exasperation as observed through Google searches for the phrase "I can't even."
As the saying goes, “Why was the corn feeling lonely? Because it was a little husk-pressed!” Nevertheless, despite the humorous backdrop of our research, the implications of our findings may prove to be no laughing matter. The potential influence of GMOs on human emotions and behaviors is a matter deserving of thorough examination, which we set out to address in this study.
Our journey into the cornfields of research was initiated by a curiosity as stirring as a kernel on a hot stove - a curiosity that eventually led us to uncover a surprising correlation. Our research aims to not only present the statistical association between GMO corn cultivation and the "I can't even" internet searches but also to provide a deeper understanding of the factors underlying this intriguing relationship.
In line with the nature of our investigation, we recognize the significance of addressing this topic in a manner that is both scientifically rigorous and entertaining. Integrating quantitative analysis with a touch of levity, we endeavor to bring to light the unexpected and amusing aspects of our findings, contributing to the scholarly discourse in a manner that is both engaging and insightful.
As we delve into the heart of our investigation, it becomes apparent that there is more to GMO corn than meets the eye – or the ear, for that matter. From a statistical standpoint, our findings reveal a strikingly high correlation coefficient along with robust statistical significance, inviting further exploration into the potential implications for public sentiment and well-being.
Should you be wondering "What did one ear of corn say to the other ear of corn? Don't look now, but I think someone is stalking us" - you are not alone. This lighthearted side to our research, however, should not overshadow the serious implications and thought-provoking questions that arise from the intriguing relationship we have unveiled. Join us as we peel back the husk of this curious correlation and sift through the kernels of insight it offers, all the while keeping an ‘ear’ out for the unexpected twists and turns that come with exploring the intersection of GMOs and human expression.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data concerning the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even" unveiled a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023. This correlation was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.8430588, indicating that approximately 84% of the variation in "I can't even" searches could be explained by the variation in GMO corn use.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) graphically depicts the strong positive correlation between GMO corn usage and the frequency of Google searches for "I can't even." It is both aesthetically pleasing and statistically significant, which is quite a-maize-ing, to say the least!
Our findings not only kernel the interest of researchers and readers but also pop the question of whether GMO corn could indeed be a-maize-ing stress relievers. This presents a cornundrum of whether GMO corn's influence reaches beyond the agricultural fields into the realm of human sentiment and expression.
In summary, our study uncovers a compelling and unexpectedly comical association, shedding light on the potential impact of GMO corn on human emotion and communication. It tantalizingly beckons further research into the mechanisms underlying this correlation and serves as a testament to the multifaceted nature of the interplay between agricultural practices and human behavior.
As Albert Einstein once said, "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." And in the same train of thought, who would have known that GMO corn's education might extend beyond farming to influence human emotional expression? It seems there's much to learn from the fields of corn and the queries of Google searches.
Additionally, it encourages scholars to approach research with an open mind and a willingness to explore unexpected phenomena, much like stumbling upon a corny joke in the midst of a serious academic paper.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a kernel of truth in the form of a remarkably high correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." This unexpectedly comical association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and robust statistical significance (p < 0.01), certainly pops the question of whether GMO corn could indeed be a stress reliever, or perhaps a stress inducer, for individuals partaking in internet searches. It seems that GMO corn may have an ear-resistible allure that extends beyond the fields, tapping into the collective exasperation of internet users.

It's as if the GMO corn is saying, "I really can't even with these search queries anymore!"

As much as we've enjoyed navigating the cornfields of correlation and causation, it's clear that further research in this area may perhaps run the risk of becoming a-maize-ingly corny. Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. After all, as they say, "Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Inquiry and Study


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Getting Corn-fused: The GMO Corn Connection to 'I Can't Even' Google Searches in Michigan with an abstract of In this corny yet kernel of truth-seeking study, we examine the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for the phrase "I can't even." Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we planted the seed of this investigation and found a surprising and humorous connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9181824 and statistical significance with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It appears that there is indeed a corn-nection (pun intended) between the cultivation of GMO corn and individuals' exasperation as manifested through their internet searches. This study unveils the comical yet thought-provoking association, raising questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human sentiment and expression. Join us in this ear-resistible journey through the corn fields of correlation and causation, sprinkled with a-maize-ing research findings and a hint of dad humor.
As a corny aside, it seems that the GMO corn may be "ear-resistible" not only in the agricultural sense, but also in tapping into collective exasperation. This research not only kernels the interest of scholars and readers alike but also pops the question: could GMO corn be a-maize-ing stress relievers after all?

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, genetically modified organisms, Michigan corn, Google searches, "I can't even," USDA data, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, internet searches, human sentiment, GMO impact, GMO cultivation, GMO corn humor

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Michigan
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Michigan that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Michigan

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.9181824 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8430588 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Michigan) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-8. 0.0000000115615565926118280000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 86,493,544 random variables You don't actually need 86 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Michigan (GMO corn %)3340446072758087869093929187858989919492
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([33,40,44,60,72,75,80,87,86,90,93,92,91,87,85,89,89,91,94,92,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Michigan"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2418 · Black Variable ID: 757 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0