about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,415 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Texas and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The genetically modified corn started expressing teenage angst, leading to a statewide existential crisis. It seems the corn wasn't the only thing feeling a little corn-fused!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' with the following scene: In a cornfield in Texas, rows of genetically modified corn plants stand tall, their leaves rustling in the breeze. Meanwhile, on a computer screen, the Google search bar displays "i cant even" as the top search term. The screen is filled with search results and social media posts expressing confusion and incredulity, as if in response to the existential angst expressed by the GMO corn. The visual depiction should emphasize the stark contrast between the serene cornfield and the chaotic virtual world of perplexed social media users. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Surrealism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cute 2D animation Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: The GMO corn started expressing existential angst, causing a ripple effect of confusion and incredulity throughout the internet.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cornfield in Texas, rows of genetically modified corn plants stand tall, their leaves rustling in the breeze. Meanwhile, on a computer screen, the Google search bar displays "i cant even" as the top search term. The screen is filled with search results and social media posts expressing confusion and incredulity, as if in response to the existential angst expressed by the GMO corn.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a cornfield in Texas, rows of genetically modified corn plants stand tall, their leaves rustling in the breeze. Meanwhile, on a computer screen, the Google search bar displays "i cant even" as the top search term. The screen is filled with search results and social media posts expressing confusion and incredulity, as if in response to the existential angst expressed by the GMO corn. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' with the following scene: In a cornfield in Texas, rows of genetically modified corn plants stand tall, their leaves rustling in the breeze. Meanwhile, on a computer screen, the Google search bar displays "i cant even" as the top search term. The screen is filled with search results and social media posts expressing confusion and incredulity, as if in response to the existential angst expressed by the GMO corn. The visual depiction should emphasize the stark contrast between the serene cornfield and the chaotic virtual world of perplexed social media users.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Texas caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

The Journal of Genetically Modified Humor Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising connection between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn crops in the great state of Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023. We uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01), bringing an unexpected insight into the world of agricultural biotechnology and internet vernacular.

Our findings suggest a strong statistical relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of 'I can't even' searches, painting a thought-provoking picture of potential cultural and environmental links. While this discovery may seem as enigmatic as the search term itself, our data-driven investigation opens the door for further exploration into the interconnected webs of food production, technology usage, and linguistic expression. By shining a light on this intriguing phenomenon, our study brings a kernel of truth to the humor-laden intersection of agriculture and digital discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising connection between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn crops in the great state of Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023. We uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01), bringing an unexpected insight into the world of agricultural biotechnology and internet vernacular.

Our findings suggest a strong statistical relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of 'I can't even' searches, painting a thought-provoking picture of potential cultural and environmental links. While this discovery may seem as enigmatic as the search term itself, our data-driven investigation opens the door for further exploration into the interconnected webs of food production, technology usage, and linguistic expression. By shining a light on this intriguing phenomenon, our study brings a kernel of truth to the humor-laden intersection of agriculture and digital discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The phrase "I can't even" has become a ubiquitous expression in modern internet vernacular, often used to convey a sense of overwhelming disbelief, exasperation, or bewilderment. The origins and evolution of this colloquialism have been a subject of fascination for linguists and internet culture enthusiasts alike. While the phrase's meteoric rise to prominence may appear to be a mere linguistic curiosity, our research has uncovered an unexpected link between its frequency in Google searches and the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the Lone Star State.

The great state of Texas, renowned for its vast agricultural landscapes and technological prowess, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. With its significant contribution to corn production and adoption of agricultural biotechnology, Texas offers a fertile ground—pun intended—for exploring the interplay between GMO usage and digital discourse. As such, our study delves into the cornfields of Texas to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn cultivation and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on the world's most popular search engine.

In this paper, we present the compelling findings of our data-driven analysis, which spans nearly two decades of comprehensive datasets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends. Our quest for understanding led us to unearthing a noteworthy correlation between GMO corn usage and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This unexpected revelation challenges conventional assumptions and beckons us to contemplate the intriguing intersection of agricultural practices, technological advancements, and cultural expressions.

Engaging with this phenomenon not only adds an unexpected twist to the scholarly discourse but also sheds light on the intricate interconnections between seemingly disparate realms. As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us explore the unusual bond between genetically modified corn and contemporary digital utterances—where the kernels of truth may lie hidden amidst the stalks of modern agricultural and linguistic landscapes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising connection between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn crops in the great state of Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023. We uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01), bringing an unexpected insight into the world of agricultural biotechnology and internet vernacular.

Our findings suggest a strong statistical relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of 'I can't even' searches, painting a thought-provoking picture of potential cultural and environmental links. While this discovery may seem as enigmatic as the search term itself, our data-driven investigation opens the door for further exploration into the interconnected webs of food production, technology usage, and linguistic expression. By shining a light on this intriguing phenomenon, our study brings a kernel of truth to the humor-laden intersection of agriculture and digital discourse.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The phrase "I can't even" has become a ubiquitous expression in modern internet vernacular, often used to convey a sense of overwhelming disbelief, exasperation, or bewilderment. The origins and evolution of this colloquialism have been a subject of fascination for linguists and internet culture enthusiasts alike. While the phrase's meteoric rise to prominence may appear to be a mere linguistic curiosity, our research has uncovered an unexpected link between its frequency in Google searches and the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the Lone Star State.

The great state of Texas, renowned for its vast agricultural landscapes and technological prowess, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. With its significant contribution to corn production and adoption of agricultural biotechnology, Texas offers a fertile ground—pun intended—for exploring the interplay between GMO usage and digital discourse. As such, our study delves into the cornfields of Texas to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn cultivation and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on the world's most popular search engine.
In this paper, we present the compelling findings of our data-driven analysis, which spans nearly two decades of comprehensive datasets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends. Our quest for understanding led us to unearthing a noteworthy correlation between GMO corn usage and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This unexpected revelation challenges conventional assumptions and beckons us to contemplate the intriguing intersection of agricultural practices, technological advancements, and cultural expressions.
Engaging with this phenomenon not only adds an unexpected twist to the scholarly discourse but also sheds light on the intricate interconnections between seemingly disparate realms. As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us explore the unusual bond between genetically modified corn and contemporary digital utterances—where the kernels of truth may lie hidden amidst the stalks of modern agricultural and linguistic landscapes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To contextualize our investigation into the perplexing connection between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the prevalence of 'I can't even' Google searches, we turn to relevant literature that sheds light on the dynamics of agricultural biotechnology, online behavioral trends, and cross-disciplinary intersections.

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO corn adoption rates across the United States, providing valuable insights into the regional variations and overarching trends in genetically modified crop cultivation. Their findings underscore the pervasive influence of biotechnological advancements on agricultural practices, setting the stage for understanding the potential implications of GMO usage on broader cultural phenomena.

On a related note, Doe's seminal work (2018) delves into the intricate nuances of internet memes and linguistic expressions in the digital era. The author illuminates the evolving dynamics of online communication, capturing the essence of contemporary colloquialisms and their resonance within virtual communities. This exploration converges with our research focus, offering a lens through which to examine the resonance of 'I can't even' as a cultural artifact within the digital landscape.

Jones' research (2020) on the cognitive psychology of language usage provides a theoretical framework for understanding the emotional and cognitive underpinnings of linguistic expressions such as 'I can't even.' Through an interdisciplinary lens, Jones elucidates the interconnected nature of language, emotion, and social cognition, providing a foundation for interpreting the behavioral implications of our observed correlation.

Expanding beyond scholarly studies, several non-fiction works offer a broader understanding of the agricultural landscape and internet culture. 'The Omnivore's Dilemma' by Michael Pollan and 'The Internet of Garbage' by Sarah Jeong provide valuable perspectives on food production and digital discourse, setting the stage for contemplating the unanticipated nexus between genetically modified corn and internet vernacular.

Transitioning to fictional literature, 'The Corn Whisperer' by John Grisham and 'The Search Engine Cipher' by Dan Brown offer fictional narratives intricately woven around agricultural mysteries and digital enigmas. While purely imaginative, these literary works compel us to ponder the potential interplay between agricultural practices and online phenomena, albeit through the lens of suspenseful storytelling.

In the realm of cinema, the films 'Children of the Corn' and 'The Social Network' present tangentially related themes of agriculture and digital connectivity, albeit in divergent contexts. These cinematic portrayals offer creative interpretations of agricultural landscapes and internet dynamics, prompting us to consider the multifaceted influences that shape cultural expressions and technological interactions.

As we navigate through the literature spanning disciplines and genres, it becomes evident that our endeavor to unravel the correlation between GMO corn usage in Texas and 'I can't even' Google searches traverses uncharted territories, blending elements of empirical inquiry, cultural analysis, and subtle humor within the scholarly landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising connection between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn crops in the great state of Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023. We uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01), bringing an unexpected insight into the world of agricultural biotechnology and internet vernacular.

Our findings suggest a strong statistical relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of 'I can't even' searches, painting a thought-provoking picture of potential cultural and environmental links. While this discovery may seem as enigmatic as the search term itself, our data-driven investigation opens the door for further exploration into the interconnected webs of food production, technology usage, and linguistic expression. By shining a light on this intriguing phenomenon, our study brings a kernel of truth to the humor-laden intersection of agriculture and digital discourse.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The phrase "I can't even" has become a ubiquitous expression in modern internet vernacular, often used to convey a sense of overwhelming disbelief, exasperation, or bewilderment. The origins and evolution of this colloquialism have been a subject of fascination for linguists and internet culture enthusiasts alike. While the phrase's meteoric rise to prominence may appear to be a mere linguistic curiosity, our research has uncovered an unexpected link between its frequency in Google searches and the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the Lone Star State.

The great state of Texas, renowned for its vast agricultural landscapes and technological prowess, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. With its significant contribution to corn production and adoption of agricultural biotechnology, Texas offers a fertile ground—pun intended—for exploring the interplay between GMO usage and digital discourse. As such, our study delves into the cornfields of Texas to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn cultivation and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on the world's most popular search engine.
In this paper, we present the compelling findings of our data-driven analysis, which spans nearly two decades of comprehensive datasets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends. Our quest for understanding led us to unearthing a noteworthy correlation between GMO corn usage and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This unexpected revelation challenges conventional assumptions and beckons us to contemplate the intriguing intersection of agricultural practices, technological advancements, and cultural expressions.
Engaging with this phenomenon not only adds an unexpected twist to the scholarly discourse but also sheds light on the intricate interconnections between seemingly disparate realms. As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us explore the unusual bond between genetically modified corn and contemporary digital utterances—where the kernels of truth may lie hidden amidst the stalks of modern agricultural and linguistic landscapes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection

Our investigation delved into the complex terrain of GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the digital domain of 'I can't even' Google searches. Our research team scavenged the depths of the internet, unearthing troves of data from disparate sources, akin to intrepid explorers embarking on a treasure hunt across the digital seas. The mainstay of our data compilation sprung from the authoritative repository of agricultural wisdom, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), akin to a wise old sage imparting knowledge to inquisitive apprentices.

Additionally, we plundered the depths of Google Trends, utilizing its bounty of search query statistics that spanned the period from 2005 to 2023. Like modern-day alchemists transmuting raw data into golden insights, we meticulously curated and distilled these extensive datasets to unveil the secrets hidden within.

Data Processing

Armed with our arsenal of datasets, our research team ventured into the labyrinthine world of statistical analysis. Employing advanced computational techniques that rival the complexity of unraveling an ancient cipher, we subjected the data to rigorous scrutiny. This involved employing correlation analyses, regression modeling, and other statistical esoterica to unearth the underlying relationships between GMO corn usage and the prevalence of 'I can't even' searches.

Throughout this methodological odyssey, we meticulously navigated the treacherous shoals of confounding variables, ensuring that our interpretations were as sound as an ancient oak tree, firmly rooted in the bedrock of robust statistical reasoning. Our aim was to unravel the enigmatic connections between agriculture and internet culture, reminiscent of decoding an ancient manuscript that conceals profound truths within its cryptic script.

Data Analysis

Having emerged from the labyrinth of statistical analysis, we ventured forth with the beacon of empirical evidence illuminating our path. Our foray into the realm of data interpretation resembled a scholarly spelunking expedition, as we probed the depths of our findings to extract the pearls of wisdom ensconced within.

Through the rigorous application of statistical tests and modeling, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01) between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. This striking revelation stood as a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains, akin to discovering a hidden passage that links two disparate worlds.

Furthermore, we undertook secondary analyses to investigate potential moderating factors and temporal trends, applying the scrutiny of scholarly inquiry like a detective unraveling the plot of a captivating mystery. This comprehensive approach allowed us to gain a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted relationship between GMO corn usage and the linguistic curiosity of 'I can't even' searches.

In discussing the Methodology above, we have endeavored to illuminate the intricate and rigorous process through which our research team ventured to unravel the enigmatic connections between GMO corn usage in Texas and the evocative phenomenon of 'I can't even' searches. This methodological adventure not only paved the way for our compelling findings but also exemplifies the intrepid spirit with which scholarly inquiry navigates the uncharted waters of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8905878, r-squared of 0.7931466, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising connection between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn crops in the great state of Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023. We uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01), bringing an unexpected insight into the world of agricultural biotechnology and internet vernacular.

Our findings suggest a strong statistical relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of 'I can't even' searches, painting a thought-provoking picture of potential cultural and environmental links. While this discovery may seem as enigmatic as the search term itself, our data-driven investigation opens the door for further exploration into the interconnected webs of food production, technology usage, and linguistic expression. By shining a light on this intriguing phenomenon, our study brings a kernel of truth to the humor-laden intersection of agriculture and digital discourse.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The phrase "I can't even" has become a ubiquitous expression in modern internet vernacular, often used to convey a sense of overwhelming disbelief, exasperation, or bewilderment. The origins and evolution of this colloquialism have been a subject of fascination for linguists and internet culture enthusiasts alike. While the phrase's meteoric rise to prominence may appear to be a mere linguistic curiosity, our research has uncovered an unexpected link between its frequency in Google searches and the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the Lone Star State.

The great state of Texas, renowned for its vast agricultural landscapes and technological prowess, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. With its significant contribution to corn production and adoption of agricultural biotechnology, Texas offers a fertile ground—pun intended—for exploring the interplay between GMO usage and digital discourse. As such, our study delves into the cornfields of Texas to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn cultivation and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on the world's most popular search engine.
In this paper, we present the compelling findings of our data-driven analysis, which spans nearly two decades of comprehensive datasets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends. Our quest for understanding led us to unearthing a noteworthy correlation between GMO corn usage and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This unexpected revelation challenges conventional assumptions and beckons us to contemplate the intriguing intersection of agricultural practices, technological advancements, and cultural expressions.
Engaging with this phenomenon not only adds an unexpected twist to the scholarly discourse but also sheds light on the intricate interconnections between seemingly disparate realms. As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us explore the unusual bond between genetically modified corn and contemporary digital utterances—where the kernels of truth may lie hidden amidst the stalks of modern agricultural and linguistic landscapes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a compelling correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Across the years 2005 to 2023, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8905878, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7931466 suggests that approximately 79.31% of the variation in 'I can't even' searches can be explained by the prevalence of GMO corn usage in Texas, adding weight to our findings.

Fig. 1 presents the visual representation of the observed correlation, depicting a scatterplot that underscores the pronounced statistical relationship between the two variables. While the scatterplot itself doesn't feature any corn kernels or frustrated internet users, its implications reach much farther than the confines of data points and regression lines—a visual testament to the unexpected connections that can be unearthed through meticulous research.

These results challenge conventional wisdom and offer a glimpse into the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and online cultural expressions. The robust statistical association between GMO corn usage and 'I can't even' searches hints at a potential convergence of technological innovation and linguistic evolution, leaving us to ponder the surreal intersection of biotechnology and digital communication.

In conclusion, our research has unraveled an intriguing kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. This unexpected association not only adds a whimsical nuance to the academic landscape but also invites further exploration into the intricate fabric of modern society, where the cobwebs of agri-tech and internet vernacular intertwine in surprising harmony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising connection between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn crops in the great state of Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023. We uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01), bringing an unexpected insight into the world of agricultural biotechnology and internet vernacular.

Our findings suggest a strong statistical relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of 'I can't even' searches, painting a thought-provoking picture of potential cultural and environmental links. While this discovery may seem as enigmatic as the search term itself, our data-driven investigation opens the door for further exploration into the interconnected webs of food production, technology usage, and linguistic expression. By shining a light on this intriguing phenomenon, our study brings a kernel of truth to the humor-laden intersection of agriculture and digital discourse.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize our investigation into the perplexing connection between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the prevalence of 'I can't even' Google searches, we turn to relevant literature that sheds light on the dynamics of agricultural biotechnology, online behavioral trends, and cross-disciplinary intersections.
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO corn adoption rates across the United States, providing valuable insights into the regional variations and overarching trends in genetically modified crop cultivation. Their findings underscore the pervasive influence of biotechnological advancements on agricultural practices, setting the stage for understanding the potential implications of GMO usage on broader cultural phenomena.
On a related note, Doe's seminal work (2018) delves into the intricate nuances of internet memes and linguistic expressions in the digital era. The author illuminates the evolving dynamics of online communication, capturing the essence of contemporary colloquialisms and their resonance within virtual communities. This exploration converges with our research focus, offering a lens through which to examine the resonance of 'I can't even' as a cultural artifact within the digital landscape.
Jones' research (2020) on the cognitive psychology of language usage provides a theoretical framework for understanding the emotional and cognitive underpinnings of linguistic expressions such as 'I can't even.' Through an interdisciplinary lens, Jones elucidates the interconnected nature of language, emotion, and social cognition, providing a foundation for interpreting the behavioral implications of our observed correlation.
Expanding beyond scholarly studies, several non-fiction works offer a broader understanding of the agricultural landscape and internet culture. 'The Omnivore's Dilemma' by Michael Pollan and 'The Internet of Garbage' by Sarah Jeong provide valuable perspectives on food production and digital discourse, setting the stage for contemplating the unanticipated nexus between genetically modified corn and internet vernacular.
Transitioning to fictional literature, 'The Corn Whisperer' by John Grisham and 'The Search Engine Cipher' by Dan Brown offer fictional narratives intricately woven around agricultural mysteries and digital enigmas. While purely imaginative, these literary works compel us to ponder the potential interplay between agricultural practices and online phenomena, albeit through the lens of suspenseful storytelling.
In the realm of cinema, the films 'Children of the Corn' and 'The Social Network' present tangentially related themes of agriculture and digital connectivity, albeit in divergent contexts. These cinematic portrayals offer creative interpretations of agricultural landscapes and internet dynamics, prompting us to consider the multifaceted influences that shape cultural expressions and technological interactions.
As we navigate through the literature spanning disciplines and genres, it becomes evident that our endeavor to unravel the correlation between GMO corn usage in Texas and 'I can't even' Google searches traverses uncharted territories, blending elements of empirical inquiry, cultural analysis, and subtle humor within the scholarly landscape.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a compelling correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Across the years 2005 to 2023, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8905878, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7931466 suggests that approximately 79.31% of the variation in 'I can't even' searches can be explained by the prevalence of GMO corn usage in Texas, adding weight to our findings.
Fig. 1 presents the visual representation of the observed correlation, depicting a scatterplot that underscores the pronounced statistical relationship between the two variables. While the scatterplot itself doesn't feature any corn kernels or frustrated internet users, its implications reach much farther than the confines of data points and regression lines—a visual testament to the unexpected connections that can be unearthed through meticulous research.
These results challenge conventional wisdom and offer a glimpse into the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and online cultural expressions. The robust statistical association between GMO corn usage and 'I can't even' searches hints at a potential convergence of technological innovation and linguistic evolution, leaving us to ponder the surreal intersection of biotechnology and digital communication.
In conclusion, our research has unraveled an intriguing kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. This unexpected association not only adds a whimsical nuance to the academic landscape but also invites further exploration into the intricate fabric of modern society, where the cobwebs of agri-tech and internet vernacular intertwine in surprising harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The substantial correlation uncovered between GMO corn usage in Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches sheds light on the captivating interplay of agriculture and online expression. While seemingly disparate, these phenomena converge in a statistically compelling manner, underscoring the complex web of influences that shape our modern world.

Our investigation aligns with prior research by Smith et al. (2015), revealing the far-reaching impact of biotechnological advancements on agricultural landscapes. The results from our study lend support to Smith et al.'s assertion, emphasizing the regional prevalence of GMO corn cultivation as a pivotal factor in understanding broader cultural dynamics. Furthermore, Doe's (2018) exploration of internet memes and linguistic expressions offers a parallel dimension to our findings, affirming the resonance of 'I can't even' as a cultural artifact within the digital realm. By corroborating these insights, our research strengthens the interdisciplinary framework through which the agricultural and digital realms intersect.

Expanding beyond the scholarly domain, our findings echo the subtle themes explored in 'Children of the Corn' and 'The Social Network,' tangentially related cinematic portrayals that surreptitiously hint at the subtle intertwining of agricultural landscapes and technological connectivity. Indirectly bridging the gap between fiction and reality, our study substantiates the enigmatic confluence of agricultural practices and digital nuance, underscoring the intricate tapestry that weaves together diverse cultural and technological domains.

The implications of our results resonate beyond the confines of conventional wisdom, prompting introspection into the surreptitious yet undeniable link between agricultural innovation and digital idiosyncrasies. In unearthing this connection, we propel the discourse surrounding the unexpected intersections of arbitrary phenomena, highlighting the multifaceted nature of cultural, technological, and linguistic evolution.

In embracing the inexplicable yet consequential correlation between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and 'I can't even' Google searches, our research delivers a lighthearted yet substantive contribution to the academic landscape. As we venture further into the uncharted territories of interdisciplinary inquiry, the seeds of curiosity sown by this investigation bear the promise of continued growth and revelation in our understanding of the intricate threads that knit together the tapestry of modern society.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the surprising connection between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn crops in the great state of Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023. We uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01), bringing an unexpected insight into the world of agricultural biotechnology and internet vernacular.

Our findings suggest a strong statistical relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of 'I can't even' searches, painting a thought-provoking picture of potential cultural and environmental links. While this discovery may seem as enigmatic as the search term itself, our data-driven investigation opens the door for further exploration into the interconnected webs of food production, technology usage, and linguistic expression. By shining a light on this intriguing phenomenon, our study brings a kernel of truth to the humor-laden intersection of agriculture and digital discourse.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The phrase "I can't even" has become a ubiquitous expression in modern internet vernacular, often used to convey a sense of overwhelming disbelief, exasperation, or bewilderment. The origins and evolution of this colloquialism have been a subject of fascination for linguists and internet culture enthusiasts alike. While the phrase's meteoric rise to prominence may appear to be a mere linguistic curiosity, our research has uncovered an unexpected link between its frequency in Google searches and the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the Lone Star State.

The great state of Texas, renowned for its vast agricultural landscapes and technological prowess, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. With its significant contribution to corn production and adoption of agricultural biotechnology, Texas offers a fertile ground—pun intended—for exploring the interplay between GMO usage and digital discourse. As such, our study delves into the cornfields of Texas to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn cultivation and the prevalence of "I can't even" searches on the world's most popular search engine.
In this paper, we present the compelling findings of our data-driven analysis, which spans nearly two decades of comprehensive datasets from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends. Our quest for understanding led us to unearthing a noteworthy correlation between GMO corn usage and the frequency of "I can't even" searches. This unexpected revelation challenges conventional assumptions and beckons us to contemplate the intriguing intersection of agricultural practices, technological advancements, and cultural expressions.
Engaging with this phenomenon not only adds an unexpected twist to the scholarly discourse but also sheds light on the intricate interconnections between seemingly disparate realms. As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us explore the unusual bond between genetically modified corn and contemporary digital utterances—where the kernels of truth may lie hidden amidst the stalks of modern agricultural and linguistic landscapes.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a compelling correlation between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Across the years 2005 to 2023, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8905878, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7931466 suggests that approximately 79.31% of the variation in 'I can't even' searches can be explained by the prevalence of GMO corn usage in Texas, adding weight to our findings.
Fig. 1 presents the visual representation of the observed correlation, depicting a scatterplot that underscores the pronounced statistical relationship between the two variables. While the scatterplot itself doesn't feature any corn kernels or frustrated internet users, its implications reach much farther than the confines of data points and regression lines—a visual testament to the unexpected connections that can be unearthed through meticulous research.
These results challenge conventional wisdom and offer a glimpse into the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and online cultural expressions. The robust statistical association between GMO corn usage and 'I can't even' searches hints at a potential convergence of technological innovation and linguistic evolution, leaving us to ponder the surreal intersection of biotechnology and digital communication.
In conclusion, our research has unraveled an intriguing kernel of truth in the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. This unexpected association not only adds a whimsical nuance to the academic landscape but also invites further exploration into the intricate fabric of modern society, where the cobwebs of agri-tech and internet vernacular intertwine in surprising harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study illuminates an enticing correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in the Lone Star State and the prevalence of "I can't even" Google searches. The robust statistical relationship uncovered, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01) and an r-squared value of 0.7931466, highlights the unexpected interconnectedness between agricultural biotechnology and digital discourse. While this connection may seem as improbable as finding a needle in a cornfield, our findings provide a thought-provoking insight into the uncharted territories of cultural and environmental interplays.

The evidence presented challenges the conventional boundaries of scholarly inquiry and beckons us to ponder the perplexing amalgamation of scientific advancements and linguistic expressions. Our data-driven exploration brings to light the enigmatic convergence of GMO corn cultivation and contemporary internet vernacular, where the enigmatic tendrils of agricultural innovation and online language intertwine in unexpected ways. The visual representation of the correlation, while devoid of corn kernels and exasperated internet users, serves as a vivid reminder of the potential for discovery lurking behind the façade of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

As we reflect on the implications of our research, it becomes clear that the fields of agriculture and digital communication share a kernel of connection, offering a lens through which to view the world with a dash of whimsy and wonder. This study opens the door for further investigations into the intricate tapestry of modern society, revealing the unlikely synchronicities that lie beneath the surface of seemingly disparate domains.

In light of these revelatory findings, we assert, with a tinge of humor and a kernel of conviction, that further research in this uniquely entertaining realm may be likened to finding a needle in a haystack—not impossible, but perhaps unnecessary. As we bid adieu to this peculiar yet enlightening terrain, let us approach our future scholarly endeavors with an open mind and a readiness to uncover the unexpected—all while resisting the urge to exclaim, "I can't even believe it!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Genetically Modified Humor Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Social Media Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Can't Even Hear the Corn Grow: A Kernel of Truth in the Link between GMO Corn Usage in Texas and 'I Can't Even' Google Searches with an abstract of This paper presents the surprising connection between the usage of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn crops in the great state of Texas and the frequency of 'I can't even' Google searches. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2005 to 2023. We uncovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8905878 (p < 0.01), bringing an unexpected insight into the world of agricultural biotechnology and internet vernacular.
Our findings suggest a strong statistical relationship between the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of 'I can't even' searches, painting a thought-provoking picture of potential cultural and environmental links. While this discovery may seem as enigmatic as the search term itself, our data-driven investigation opens the door for further exploration into the interconnected webs of food production, technology usage, and linguistic expression. By shining a light on this intriguing phenomenon, our study brings a kernel of truth to the humor-laden intersection of agriculture and digital discourse.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Texas, Google searches, correlation coefficient, USDA data, Google Trends, agricultural biotechnology, internet vernacular, cultural links, environmental links, food production, technology usage, linguistic expression, GMO corn cultivation, statistical relationship, digital discourse.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Texas that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Texas

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.8905878 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7931466 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Texas) over the 19 years from 2005 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.2E-7. 0.0000003221059086438096000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 3.2E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,104,569 random variables You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Texas (GMO corn %)72777978848588858991899095939592929295
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)2433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([72,77,79,78,84,85,88,85,89,91,89,90,95,93,95,92,92,92,95,])
array_2 = np.array([24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Texas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2415 · Black Variable ID: 764 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0