about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,409 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The genetically modified soybeans became so advanced that even their own DNA couldn't even handle it. The soybeans were walking around like, "I can't even photosynthesize right now." And their pods were all, "I can't even contain myself." It was a whole soy-entific meltdown. The internet just couldn't handle the soybean drama, and people everywhere were like, "I can't even." The soybeans basically turned Minnesota into the Land of 10,000 Memes.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Minnesota soybean field transformed by biotechnology, with towering genetically modified soybean plants surrounded by a myriad of laptop screens displaying constant Google searches for "i can't even." The plants have an exaggerated expression of teenage angst, appearing to droop dramatically, while internet users worldwide grapple with their own existential crises, stemming from the unexpected behavior of the plants. The scene should depict a high-tech atmosphere, blending the natural landscape with the digital world. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' High-tech Realistic Cyberpunk Minimalism
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: The GMO soybeans were so advanced, they started expressing teenage angst, leading to a widespread existential crisis among internet users.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Minnesota soybean field, the genetically modified soybean plants towering over the landscape are surrounded by a flurry of laptop screens displaying endless Google searches for "i can't even." The soybean plants appear to be drooping with an exaggerated expression of teenage angst, while internet users around the world grapple with their own existential crisis sparked by the unexpected behavior of the plants.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a Minnesota soybean field, the genetically modified soybean plants towering over the landscape are surrounded by a flurry of laptop screens displaying endless Google searches for "i can't even." The soybean plants appear to be drooping with an exaggerated expression of teenage angst, while internet users around the world grapple with their own existential crisis sparked by the unexpected behavior of the plants. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Minnesota soybean field transformed by biotechnology, with towering genetically modified soybean plants surrounded by a myriad of laptop screens displaying constant Google searches for "i can't even." The plants have an exaggerated expression of teenage angst, appearing to droop dramatically, while internet users worldwide grapple with their own existential crises, stemming from the unexpected behavior of the plants. The scene should depict a high-tech atmosphere, blending the natural landscape with the digital world.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota

The Journal of Agricultural Anxieties

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study scrutinizes the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the Google search frequency for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings suggest that there may be more to soybeans than meets the eye, as they appear to be intertwined with the emotional struggles and frustrations of a significant portion of the Minnesota population, leading to an increase in expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. This unexpected connection between genetically modified soybeans and contemporary linguistic phenomena invites further investigation into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybean consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study scrutinizes the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the Google search frequency for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings suggest that there may be more to soybeans than meets the eye, as they appear to be intertwined with the emotional struggles and frustrations of a significant portion of the Minnesota population, leading to an increase in expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. This unexpected connection between genetically modified soybeans and contemporary linguistic phenomena invites further investigation into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybean consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of widespread debate and scrutiny in recent years. While much of the focus has been on the potential impacts of GMOs on human health and the environment, there remains a dearth of research on their potential effects on the linguistic expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the unlikely correlation between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the ever-relatable phrase 'i cant even.'

The relationship between GMO soybeans and the exasperated sighs of millennials might seem as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, or perhaps more fittingly, as elusive as picking out the non-GMO products in the grocery store. However, our analysis of USDA data on soybean cultivation and Google Trends data on 'i cant even' queries has revealed a striking connection between these seemingly disparate elements. The correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence of a strong association, leaving us to ponder whether there is more to the humble soybean than meets the eye.

As we embark on this journey to unravel the enigmatic interplay between GMO soybeans and the modern language of exasperation, we must acknowledge the inherent complexity of these phenomena. It is essential to approach this investigation with the utmost gravitas, just as one carefully considers the potential perils of substituting regular flour with gluten-free flour in a baking recipe. We are compelled to inquire: What is it about GMO soybeans that appears to resonate so deeply with the exasperation and frustration echoed in the 'i cant even' laments of the digital age?

The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of linguistic curiosities; they may offer insights into the broader societal, psychological, and culinary implications of GMO soybean consumption. This unexpected connection urges us to venture into uncharted territories of agricultural and linguistic inquiry, to grapple with the profound question: Could GMO soybeans be the unsung protagonists of a modern-day linguistic melodrama?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study scrutinizes the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the Google search frequency for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings suggest that there may be more to soybeans than meets the eye, as they appear to be intertwined with the emotional struggles and frustrations of a significant portion of the Minnesota population, leading to an increase in expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. This unexpected connection between genetically modified soybeans and contemporary linguistic phenomena invites further investigation into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybean consumption.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of widespread debate and scrutiny in recent years. While much of the focus has been on the potential impacts of GMOs on human health and the environment, there remains a dearth of research on their potential effects on the linguistic expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the unlikely correlation between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the ever-relatable phrase 'i cant even.'
The relationship between GMO soybeans and the exasperated sighs of millennials might seem as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, or perhaps more fittingly, as elusive as picking out the non-GMO products in the grocery store. However, our analysis of USDA data on soybean cultivation and Google Trends data on 'i cant even' queries has revealed a striking connection between these seemingly disparate elements. The correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence of a strong association, leaving us to ponder whether there is more to the humble soybean than meets the eye.
As we embark on this journey to unravel the enigmatic interplay between GMO soybeans and the modern language of exasperation, we must acknowledge the inherent complexity of these phenomena. It is essential to approach this investigation with the utmost gravitas, just as one carefully considers the potential perils of substituting regular flour with gluten-free flour in a baking recipe. We are compelled to inquire: What is it about GMO soybeans that appears to resonate so deeply with the exasperation and frustration echoed in the 'i cant even' laments of the digital age?
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of linguistic curiosities; they may offer insights into the broader societal, psychological, and culinary implications of GMO soybean consumption. This unexpected connection urges us to venture into uncharted territories of agricultural and linguistic inquiry, to grapple with the profound question: Could GMO soybeans be the unsung protagonists of a modern-day linguistic melodrama?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors, Smith et al., in their seminal work "The Impact of GMOs on Agricultural Practices" demonstrate the extensive influence of genetically modified soybeans on farming methods and crop yields. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Genetic Modification and Its Societal Implications," delve into the broader ramifications of GMO adoption on consumer preferences and attitudes.

Moving beyond the realm of traditional academic literature, we find compelling connections in popular non-fiction works such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens" by Paul Knoepfler. These books, while not explicitly focusing on linguistic phenomena, offer valuable insights into the societal discourse surrounding GMOs and their potential impact on human behavior and communication.

In the realm of fiction, novels such as "Seeds of Deception" by Jeffrey M. Smith and "Oryx and Crake" by Margaret Atwood present imaginative explorations of genetic engineering and its unforeseen consequences, inspiring contemplation of the intricate web of interactions between agricultural practices, human emotions, and linguistic expressions.

Moreover, a foray into childhood cartoons and television programming yields unexpected revelations. By revisiting episodes of "Dexter's Laboratory" and "Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius," we encounter playful yet thought-provoking portrayals of genetically modified creations, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the entanglement of molecular biology, agricultural innovation, and human perplexity.

These diverse sources collectively lay the groundwork for our examination of the inexplicable correspondence between GMO soybeans and the remarkably relatable sentiment expressed in the ubiquitous digital refrain, "i cant even." As we traverse the interdisciplinary terrain of agriculture, linguistics, and popular culture, we are poised to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly incongruous domains, with a touch of levity and curiosity propelling our quest for understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study scrutinizes the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the Google search frequency for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings suggest that there may be more to soybeans than meets the eye, as they appear to be intertwined with the emotional struggles and frustrations of a significant portion of the Minnesota population, leading to an increase in expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. This unexpected connection between genetically modified soybeans and contemporary linguistic phenomena invites further investigation into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybean consumption.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of widespread debate and scrutiny in recent years. While much of the focus has been on the potential impacts of GMOs on human health and the environment, there remains a dearth of research on their potential effects on the linguistic expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the unlikely correlation between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the ever-relatable phrase 'i cant even.'
The relationship between GMO soybeans and the exasperated sighs of millennials might seem as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, or perhaps more fittingly, as elusive as picking out the non-GMO products in the grocery store. However, our analysis of USDA data on soybean cultivation and Google Trends data on 'i cant even' queries has revealed a striking connection between these seemingly disparate elements. The correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence of a strong association, leaving us to ponder whether there is more to the humble soybean than meets the eye.
As we embark on this journey to unravel the enigmatic interplay between GMO soybeans and the modern language of exasperation, we must acknowledge the inherent complexity of these phenomena. It is essential to approach this investigation with the utmost gravitas, just as one carefully considers the potential perils of substituting regular flour with gluten-free flour in a baking recipe. We are compelled to inquire: What is it about GMO soybeans that appears to resonate so deeply with the exasperation and frustration echoed in the 'i cant even' laments of the digital age?
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of linguistic curiosities; they may offer insights into the broader societal, psychological, and culinary implications of GMO soybean consumption. This unexpected connection urges us to venture into uncharted territories of agricultural and linguistic inquiry, to grapple with the profound question: Could GMO soybeans be the unsung protagonists of a modern-day linguistic melodrama?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The present study relied on digital data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. Utilizing advanced search algorithms and data mining techniques, the research team scoured the vast expanses of the internet to retrieve information relevant to genetically modified soybean cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i cant even'. The data were meticulously sourced and meticulously curated, like a diligent gardener tending to their genetically modified crop, ensuring that the study was rooted in robust and comprehensive datasets.

GMO Soybean Analysis:
To quantify the extent of GMO soybean cultivation in Minnesota, the research team analyzed USDA reports on soybean production, carefully differentiating between genetically modified and non-genetically modified varieties. This entailed scrutinizing detailed agricultural statistics and deciphering the cryptic codes of soybean taxonomy, not unlike solving a particularly challenging crossword puzzle, with the added complexity of genetic engineering terminology. The aim was to discern the prevalence of GMO soybean cultivation and its temporal trends, tackling the task with the diligence of a linguistic sleuth unraveling the nuances of modern-day vernacular expressions.

'I Cant Even' Search Frequency:
In parallel, the frequency of 'i cant even' searches on Google was meticulously tracked using Google Trends, capturing the ebbs and flows of exasperation and bewilderment within the digital sphere. This involved employing sophisticated data visualization tools and statistical analyses to disentangle the intricate web of search queries, akin to observing the undulating waves of human emotion in a digital ocean. The intention was to capture the zeitgeist of exasperation and frustration, quantified in the form of search frequency, and to forge connections between this linguistic phenomenon and the cultivation of GMO soybeans.

Correlative Analysis:
The received data were subjected to rigorous statistical scrutiny, wielding the formidable arsenal of correlation analysis to unveil potential relationships between GMO soybean cultivation and 'i cant even' search frequency. Through the application of complex statistical models and data manipulation techniques, the research team endeavored to illuminate the intricate dance of correlation, unveiling connections as subtle as the flavors in a dish prepared with organic versus genetically modified ingredients. The correlation coefficient was computed to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship, while the p-value provided critical insights into the statistical significance of the observed connections.

Control Variables:
In interpreting the findings, meticulous attention was devoted to controlling for extraneous factors that could confound the association between GMO soybean cultivation and 'i cant even' search frequency. Various socio-economic, demographic, and environmental variables were considered, akin to a discerning chef meticulously adjusting the seasoning in a culinary masterpiece, to ensure that the observed relationship with genetically modified soybeans was not merely a spurious confluence of trends. The control variables were carefully selected and rigorously integrated into the analytical framework, ensuring that the observed connections could withstand the scrutiny of scholarly inquiry.

Ethical Considerations:
In adherence to ethical standards of research conduct, the study upheld the principles of data privacy and confidentiality, safeguarding the anonymity of individuals whose digital footprints were woven into the fabric of the analysis. The research team exercised utmost caution in handling and interpreting the digital traces of human expression, akin to the delicate task of preserving the purity of an ancient manuscript during scholarly examination.

Limitations:
It is imperative to acknowledge the potential limitations inherent in the present study. While every effort was expended to gather and analyze data with meticulous precision, the inherent complexities of digital data and statistical inference inevitably introduce a degree of uncertainty. The multifaceted nature of human expression and agricultural practices renders the establishment of causal relationships an elusive endeavor, much like attempting to pin down the exact ingredients of a secret family recipe.

In sum, the methodological approach adopted in this investigation reflects a conscientious and comprehensive effort to disentangle the enigmatic relationship between GMO soybeans and the linguistic expressions of exasperation. The distinct analytical techniques applied to the datasets sought to unravel the intricate tapestry of connections, painting a portrait of unexpected correlations and prompting further inquiries into the interplay of agricultural practices and contemporary linguistic manifestations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8855932, r-squared of 0.7842754, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study scrutinizes the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the Google search frequency for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings suggest that there may be more to soybeans than meets the eye, as they appear to be intertwined with the emotional struggles and frustrations of a significant portion of the Minnesota population, leading to an increase in expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. This unexpected connection between genetically modified soybeans and contemporary linguistic phenomena invites further investigation into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybean consumption.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of widespread debate and scrutiny in recent years. While much of the focus has been on the potential impacts of GMOs on human health and the environment, there remains a dearth of research on their potential effects on the linguistic expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the unlikely correlation between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the ever-relatable phrase 'i cant even.'
The relationship between GMO soybeans and the exasperated sighs of millennials might seem as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, or perhaps more fittingly, as elusive as picking out the non-GMO products in the grocery store. However, our analysis of USDA data on soybean cultivation and Google Trends data on 'i cant even' queries has revealed a striking connection between these seemingly disparate elements. The correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence of a strong association, leaving us to ponder whether there is more to the humble soybean than meets the eye.
As we embark on this journey to unravel the enigmatic interplay between GMO soybeans and the modern language of exasperation, we must acknowledge the inherent complexity of these phenomena. It is essential to approach this investigation with the utmost gravitas, just as one carefully considers the potential perils of substituting regular flour with gluten-free flour in a baking recipe. We are compelled to inquire: What is it about GMO soybeans that appears to resonate so deeply with the exasperation and frustration echoed in the 'i cant even' laments of the digital age?
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of linguistic curiosities; they may offer insights into the broader societal, psychological, and culinary implications of GMO soybean consumption. This unexpected connection urges us to venture into uncharted territories of agricultural and linguistic inquiry, to grapple with the profound question: Could GMO soybeans be the unsung protagonists of a modern-day linguistic melodrama?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. This finding implies a strong and positive relationship between these variables, reminiscent of the unbreakable bond between peanut butter and jelly – a match seemingly made in gastronomic heaven.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7842754 indicated that approximately 78.43% of the variation in the frequency of 'i cant even' searches can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Minnesota. This suggests that GMO soybeans may hold a significant sway over the collective exasperation experienced by a certain demographic of internet users, much like the allure of a freshly brewed cup of coffee on a Monday morning.

The level of significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship found. This result is so statistically significant that it would make even the most skeptical observer 'cant even' deny the apparent link between GMO soybeans and digital frustrations.

The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the strength of the association, reminiscent of a perfectly choreographed dance between two seemingly incongruous partners. The scatterplot illustrates the synchronous rise and fall of GMO soybean use and 'i cant even' searches, akin to a harmonious duet between bitter coffee and an exasperated sigh.

In conclusion, our analysis has unearthed a compelling correlation between GMO soybean cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere. This unexpected nexus calls for further exploration into the multifaceted implications of GMO soybeans on the emotional fabric of society, leaving us to ponder the profound question: Are GMO soybeans the unsung maestros orchestrating the symphony of exasperation in the modern age?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study scrutinizes the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the Google search frequency for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings suggest that there may be more to soybeans than meets the eye, as they appear to be intertwined with the emotional struggles and frustrations of a significant portion of the Minnesota population, leading to an increase in expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. This unexpected connection between genetically modified soybeans and contemporary linguistic phenomena invites further investigation into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybean consumption.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors, Smith et al., in their seminal work "The Impact of GMOs on Agricultural Practices" demonstrate the extensive influence of genetically modified soybeans on farming methods and crop yields. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Genetic Modification and Its Societal Implications," delve into the broader ramifications of GMO adoption on consumer preferences and attitudes.
Moving beyond the realm of traditional academic literature, we find compelling connections in popular non-fiction works such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens" by Paul Knoepfler. These books, while not explicitly focusing on linguistic phenomena, offer valuable insights into the societal discourse surrounding GMOs and their potential impact on human behavior and communication.
In the realm of fiction, novels such as "Seeds of Deception" by Jeffrey M. Smith and "Oryx and Crake" by Margaret Atwood present imaginative explorations of genetic engineering and its unforeseen consequences, inspiring contemplation of the intricate web of interactions between agricultural practices, human emotions, and linguistic expressions.
Moreover, a foray into childhood cartoons and television programming yields unexpected revelations. By revisiting episodes of "Dexter's Laboratory" and "Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius," we encounter playful yet thought-provoking portrayals of genetically modified creations, offering a whimsical lens through which to view the entanglement of molecular biology, agricultural innovation, and human perplexity.
These diverse sources collectively lay the groundwork for our examination of the inexplicable correspondence between GMO soybeans and the remarkably relatable sentiment expressed in the ubiquitous digital refrain, "i cant even." As we traverse the interdisciplinary terrain of agriculture, linguistics, and popular culture, we are poised to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly incongruous domains, with a touch of levity and curiosity propelling our quest for understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. This finding implies a strong and positive relationship between these variables, reminiscent of the unbreakable bond between peanut butter and jelly – a match seemingly made in gastronomic heaven.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7842754 indicated that approximately 78.43% of the variation in the frequency of 'i cant even' searches can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Minnesota. This suggests that GMO soybeans may hold a significant sway over the collective exasperation experienced by a certain demographic of internet users, much like the allure of a freshly brewed cup of coffee on a Monday morning.
The level of significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship found. This result is so statistically significant that it would make even the most skeptical observer 'cant even' deny the apparent link between GMO soybeans and digital frustrations.
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the strength of the association, reminiscent of a perfectly choreographed dance between two seemingly incongruous partners. The scatterplot illustrates the synchronous rise and fall of GMO soybean use and 'i cant even' searches, akin to a harmonious duet between bitter coffee and an exasperated sigh.
In conclusion, our analysis has unearthed a compelling correlation between GMO soybean cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere. This unexpected nexus calls for further exploration into the multifaceted implications of GMO soybeans on the emotional fabric of society, leaving us to ponder the profound question: Are GMO soybeans the unsung maestros orchestrating the symphony of exasperation in the modern age?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence for a previously unexplored link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i cant even.' Our results align with prior research by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, underscoring the significant impact of GMO adoption on both agricultural practices and societal attitudes. In a defiantly 21st-century twist, our study sheds light on the unexpected yet robust association between the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans and the articulation of exasperation in the digital sphere.

The unexpected observation from childhood cartoons and television programming hinted at the playful yet potentially profound connections between genetic engineering, agricultural innovation, and human perplexity. Our findings provide empirical support for the speculation raised in these diverse sources, revealing a statistical significance akin to the comedic timing of a well-crafted punchline. Indeed, the seemingly whimsical connections unearthed from these unconventional sources have been validated by the rigorous statistical analyses conducted in this study, adding a touch of levity to our quest for understanding while maintaining a commitment to empirical inquiry.

The strikingly high correlation coefficient and the substantial coefficient of determination demonstrate the undeniable influence of GMO soybean use on digital expressions of exasperation, akin to the unmistakable aroma of a well-roasted coffee bean. The robustness of the relationship, exemplified by the p-value of less than 0.01, forces even the most stoic observer to acknowledge the compelling nexus between GMO soybeans and online frustrations, not unlike the inevitability of a catchy tune getting stuck in one's head.

While the precise mechanisms underlying this correlation remain the subject of speculation, our study paves the way for further investigations into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybeans on the emotional fabric of society. The unanticipated convergence of molecular biology and linguistic expressions prompts a reevaluation of the multifaceted role played by agricultural innovations in shaping human emotions and communication, prompting one to wonder: are GMO soybeans inadvertently becoming the unsung maestros orchestrating the symphony of exasperation in the modern age? One can almost envision these innocuous legumes donning conductor's batons, summoning a cacophony of exasperated outcries from the digital masses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study scrutinizes the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the Google search frequency for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings suggest that there may be more to soybeans than meets the eye, as they appear to be intertwined with the emotional struggles and frustrations of a significant portion of the Minnesota population, leading to an increase in expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. This unexpected connection between genetically modified soybeans and contemporary linguistic phenomena invites further investigation into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybean consumption.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of widespread debate and scrutiny in recent years. While much of the focus has been on the potential impacts of GMOs on human health and the environment, there remains a dearth of research on their potential effects on the linguistic expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. In this paper, we delve into the unlikely correlation between the cultivation of GMO soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the ever-relatable phrase 'i cant even.'
The relationship between GMO soybeans and the exasperated sighs of millennials might seem as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, or perhaps more fittingly, as elusive as picking out the non-GMO products in the grocery store. However, our analysis of USDA data on soybean cultivation and Google Trends data on 'i cant even' queries has revealed a striking connection between these seemingly disparate elements. The correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence of a strong association, leaving us to ponder whether there is more to the humble soybean than meets the eye.
As we embark on this journey to unravel the enigmatic interplay between GMO soybeans and the modern language of exasperation, we must acknowledge the inherent complexity of these phenomena. It is essential to approach this investigation with the utmost gravitas, just as one carefully considers the potential perils of substituting regular flour with gluten-free flour in a baking recipe. We are compelled to inquire: What is it about GMO soybeans that appears to resonate so deeply with the exasperation and frustration echoed in the 'i cant even' laments of the digital age?
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of linguistic curiosities; they may offer insights into the broader societal, psychological, and culinary implications of GMO soybean consumption. This unexpected connection urges us to venture into uncharted territories of agricultural and linguistic inquiry, to grapple with the profound question: Could GMO soybeans be the unsung protagonists of a modern-day linguistic melodrama?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. This finding implies a strong and positive relationship between these variables, reminiscent of the unbreakable bond between peanut butter and jelly – a match seemingly made in gastronomic heaven.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7842754 indicated that approximately 78.43% of the variation in the frequency of 'i cant even' searches can be explained by the use of GMO soybeans in Minnesota. This suggests that GMO soybeans may hold a significant sway over the collective exasperation experienced by a certain demographic of internet users, much like the allure of a freshly brewed cup of coffee on a Monday morning.
The level of significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship found. This result is so statistically significant that it would make even the most skeptical observer 'cant even' deny the apparent link between GMO soybeans and digital frustrations.
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the strength of the association, reminiscent of a perfectly choreographed dance between two seemingly incongruous partners. The scatterplot illustrates the synchronous rise and fall of GMO soybean use and 'i cant even' searches, akin to a harmonious duet between bitter coffee and an exasperated sigh.
In conclusion, our analysis has unearthed a compelling correlation between GMO soybean cultivation in Minnesota and the frequency of expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere. This unexpected nexus calls for further exploration into the multifaceted implications of GMO soybeans on the emotional fabric of society, leaving us to ponder the profound question: Are GMO soybeans the unsung maestros orchestrating the symphony of exasperation in the modern age?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the light of the compelling findings of this study, it seems that the connection between GMO soybeans and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches in Minnesota is as robust as the bond between avocados and toast – inseparable. This unexpected correlation has illuminated a hitherto unexplored dimension of soybean cultivation, suggesting that GMO soybeans may hold sway over the collective exasperation experienced by a certain demographic of internet users.

The striking correlation coefficient and the exceptionally low p-value speak volumes about the strength of this relationship, much like a resounding symphony of exasperation echoing through the digital realm. The scatterplot visually encapsulates the synchronous rise and fall of GMO soybean use and 'i cant even' searches, akin to a harmonious duet between a perplexing ingredient and an exasperated sigh – a duet that would leave even the most seasoned chef scratching their head.

While the implications of this connection may seem as vast and unforeseeable as the GMO section of a grocery store, it is clear that GMO soybeans have more profound effects than previously imagined. This unanticipated linkage begs the question: Are GMO soybeans the unsung maestros orchestrating the symphony of exasperation in the modern age? It is indeed a culinary and linguistic conundrum that perhaps only the enigmatic soybean itself can explain.

In the grand scheme of agricultural and linguistic curiosities, our findings shed light on the unexplored facets of GMO soybeans, leaving a taste of bewilderment and a dash of intrigue. With such compelling evidence at hand, it is fair to say that further research in this area is simply not warranted. After all, once you've found the missing puzzle piece, do you really need to search for more?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anxieties


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Culinary Compliance and Culinary Sciences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Soy 'I Cant Even': The Link Between GMO Soybeans and Millennial Frustration in Minnesota with an abstract of This study scrutinizes the perplexing relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Minnesota and the Google search frequency for the phrase 'i cant even' from 2004 to 2022. By analyzing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we have identified a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8855932 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings suggest that there may be more to soybeans than meets the eye, as they appear to be intertwined with the emotional struggles and frustrations of a significant portion of the Minnesota population, leading to an increase in expressions of exasperation and bewilderment. This unexpected connection between genetically modified soybeans and contemporary linguistic phenomena invites further investigation into the societal, psychological, and potentially gastronomical implications of GMO soybean consumption.

ChatGPT:

Genetically modified soybeans, GMO soybeans, Minnesota, millennial frustration, Google search frequency, "i cant even" phrase, correlation coefficient, USDA data, Google Trends, emotional struggles, linguistic phenomena, societal implications, psychological implications, gastronomical implications.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Minnesota that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.8855932 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7842754 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.6E-7. 0.0000004625397257860005400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 4.6E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,161,976 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota (GMO soybeans %)82838892919293959193949596969595939696
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([82,83,88,92,91,92,93,95,91,93,94,95,96,96,95,95,93,96,96,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Minnesota"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2409 · Black Variable ID: 819 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0