about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,407 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The soybeans in Ohio became so productive that they started exuding a mysterious gas, leading to a surge in demand for gas-powered vehicles in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. It turns out, these soybeans were just a bunch of 'soy'cological pranksters, creating a 'bean'd new way to fuel cars with their 'soy'vereign gas emissions...Okay, I can't keep a straight face - this is purely for entertainment!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant and bustling steampunk-inspired scene. In the foreground, depict a meticulously designed steampunk tractor with brass gears and pipes, powered by shimmering GMO soybeans. The tractor should be roaring through rows of lush soybean fields in Ohio, with the vibrant green plants exuding an intense energy. In the background, hint at Saint Vincent/Grenadines with industrial steampunk structures emitting billows of greenhouse gas-induced steam, symbolizing the increase in agricultural activity. Capture the essence of sustainability and urgency in the scene with a steampunk twist, where technology and nature intertwine in a visually captivating way. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech Steampunk Cutsy art illustration Magic realism Cutsy graphics
ChatGPT: Steampunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines, in the following situation: The soybeans were so full of energy that the tractors just couldn't help but rev up and burn more fossil fuels! Each GMO soybean was like a little turbo boost for the entire agricultural industry, leading to an unexpected surge in fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. It's like the soybeans were secretly whispering, "Step on the gas, farmers, let's go faster and greener!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Ohio, fields of soybeans stretch out under a bright blue sky. Tractors roar to life, kicking up dust as they speed through the rows. Each GMO soybean seems to shimmer with energy, fueling the tractors like little turbo boosts. Meanwhile, in Saint Vincent/Grenadines, the air is thick with the scent of burning fossil fuels as the unexpected surge in agricultural activity leads to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The soybeans' whispers seem to echo across the ocean, spurring the farmers to step on the gas and go faster, yet greener, in their work.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Steampunk ] and depicting this scene: In Ohio, fields of soybeans stretch out under a bright blue sky. Tractors roar to life, kicking up dust as they speed through the rows. Each GMO soybean seems to shimmer with energy, fueling the tractors like little turbo boosts. Meanwhile, in Saint Vincent/Grenadines, the air is thick with the scent of burning fossil fuels as the unexpected surge in agricultural activity leads to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The soybeans' whispers seem to echo across the ocean, spurring the farmers to step on the gas and go faster, yet greener, in their work. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vibrant and bustling steampunk-inspired scene. In the foreground, depict a meticulously designed steampunk tractor with brass gears and pipes, powered by shimmering GMO soybeans. The tractor should be roaring through rows of lush soybean fields in Ohio, with the vibrant green plants exuding an intense energy. In the background, hint at Saint Vincent/Grenadines with industrial steampunk structures emitting billows of greenhouse gas-induced steam, symbolizing the increase in agricultural activity. Capture the essence of sustainability and urgency in the scene with a steampunk twist, where technology and nature intertwine in a visually captivating way.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Ohio caused Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

The International Journal of Agroecological Investigations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous analysis to elucidate this unconventional correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 with a striking significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021.

The research provides compelling evidence that the widespread use of GMO soybeans in Ohio may have unforeseen consequences on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In this academic pursuit, we undertook a thorough investigation that not only unearths the statistical link but also sheds light on the potential implications of this unexpected connection. We urge further examination of this unorthodox relationship and propose avenues for future research to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy consumption on a global scale.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous analysis to elucidate this unconventional correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 with a striking significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021.

The research provides compelling evidence that the widespread use of GMO soybeans in Ohio may have unforeseen consequences on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In this academic pursuit, we undertook a thorough investigation that not only unearths the statistical link but also sheds light on the potential implications of this unexpected connection. We urge further examination of this unorthodox relationship and propose avenues for future research to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy consumption on a global scale.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of agricultural and energy research has often been described as a tangled web of interconnected factors - a veritable cornucopia of complexity, if you will. In this pursuit of unraveling these threads, we stumble upon a serendipitous discovery: a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a pea in a soybean pod. Our study delves into the conundrum of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in the heartland of Ohio and the subtle and elusive dance of fossil fuel consumption on the idyllic islands of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

As the research community is well aware, correlations can often be like finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, locating that elusive soybean amidst the vast expanse of Ohio farmland. We were intrigued by the possibility of an unanticipated link between these seemingly divergent variables – akin to discovering that peas and carrots have been secretly conspiring to influence our dietary choices all along.

The agricultural landscape is indeed a fertile ground for surprise, much like a field of wildflowers that bloom in unexpected patterns. Similarly, the energy sector dances to its own rhythm, not unlike a lively tango of fossil fuel consumption, complete with its own twists and turns. Our study aims to shed light on this dance, not unlike unraveling a mystery novel, with each data point serving as a clue along the way.

Thus, armed with a plethora of data and statistical tools, we embarked on this scientific endeavor with the vigor of an aspiring chef trying to concoct the perfect recipe. We scrutinized years of USDA reports and delved into the labyrinthine corridors of the Energy Information Administration's archives to connect the dots between GMO soybean adoption and fossil fuel consumption. Our journey uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient, akin to finding a golden egg in the proverbial statistical haystack, with a significance level that rivals the most captivating plot twists in a mystery novel.

In a world where assumptions often lead to misinterpretations, this unconventional connection piqued our curiosity. We call upon the scholarly community to walk alongside us on this unorthodox path and embrace the curiosity to uncover the hidden handiwork of nature and human influence, much like deciphering the workings of a complex multi-layered cake. So, let us embark on this scientific escapade together and venture into the unexplored terrain where soybeans and fossil fuels whisper their secrets to those who dare to listen.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous analysis to elucidate this unconventional correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 with a striking significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021.

The research provides compelling evidence that the widespread use of GMO soybeans in Ohio may have unforeseen consequences on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In this academic pursuit, we undertook a thorough investigation that not only unearths the statistical link but also sheds light on the potential implications of this unexpected connection. We urge further examination of this unorthodox relationship and propose avenues for future research to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy consumption on a global scale.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural and energy research has often been described as a tangled web of interconnected factors - a veritable cornucopia of complexity, if you will. In this pursuit of unraveling these threads, we stumble upon a serendipitous discovery: a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a pea in a soybean pod. Our study delves into the conundrum of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in the heartland of Ohio and the subtle and elusive dance of fossil fuel consumption on the idyllic islands of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
As the research community is well aware, correlations can often be like finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, locating that elusive soybean amidst the vast expanse of Ohio farmland. We were intrigued by the possibility of an unanticipated link between these seemingly divergent variables – akin to discovering that peas and carrots have been secretly conspiring to influence our dietary choices all along.
The agricultural landscape is indeed a fertile ground for surprise, much like a field of wildflowers that bloom in unexpected patterns. Similarly, the energy sector dances to its own rhythm, not unlike a lively tango of fossil fuel consumption, complete with its own twists and turns. Our study aims to shed light on this dance, not unlike unraveling a mystery novel, with each data point serving as a clue along the way.
Thus, armed with a plethora of data and statistical tools, we embarked on this scientific endeavor with the vigor of an aspiring chef trying to concoct the perfect recipe. We scrutinized years of USDA reports and delved into the labyrinthine corridors of the Energy Information Administration's archives to connect the dots between GMO soybean adoption and fossil fuel consumption. Our journey uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient, akin to finding a golden egg in the proverbial statistical haystack, with a significance level that rivals the most captivating plot twists in a mystery novel.
In a world where assumptions often lead to misinterpretations, this unconventional connection piqued our curiosity. We call upon the scholarly community to walk alongside us on this unorthodox path and embrace the curiosity to uncover the hidden handiwork of nature and human influence, much like deciphering the workings of a complex multi-layered cake. So, let us embark on this scientific escapade together and venture into the unexplored terrain where soybeans and fossil fuels whisper their secrets to those who dare to listen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we delve into the depths of the literature surrounding the curious correlation between GMO soybeans in Ohio and fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, we encounter a wealth of scholarly work that spans the realms of agriculture, energy, and everything in between. Smith (2010) provides valuable insights into the adoption of GMO soybeans in the Midwest, shedding light on the economic and environmental implications. Building upon this foundation, Doe (2015) uncovers the complex web of energy consumption patterns in small island nations, offering a nuanced perspective that encompasses the interplay of various factors. Jones (2018) further extends this discourse by examining the global dynamics of agricultural practices and their influence on energy demand, contributing to our understanding of this intricate tapestry.

Beyond the realm of scholarly articles, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a thought-provoking exploration of the modern agricultural landscape, delving into the far-reaching ramifications of our food choices. Similarly, "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein presents a compelling analysis of the interwoven nature of environmental challenges and economic systems, providing valuable context to the broader implications of agricultural practices on energy consumption.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Botany of Desire" by Michael Pollan and "The Overstory" by Richard Powers invite readers to contemplate the interconnectedness of plant life and human existence, weaving a narrative that resonates with the underlying theme of symbiotic relationships.

In our quest for unconventional wisdom, we found ourselves drawing inspiration from unexpected sources, including cartoons and children's shows that offer a whimsical yet insightful perspective on the natural world. From the educational prowess of "Magic School Bus" to the whimsical adventures of "SpongeBob SquarePants," these lighthearted yet informative narratives provided a refreshing lens through which to explore the intricate dance of plant genetics and energy dynamics.

And with that, we find ourselves at the crossroads of knowledge and whimsy, prepared to embark on a journey through the annals of research and beyond, where the serious and the lighthearted converge in a harmonious dance of scholarly discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous analysis to elucidate this unconventional correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 with a striking significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021.

The research provides compelling evidence that the widespread use of GMO soybeans in Ohio may have unforeseen consequences on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In this academic pursuit, we undertook a thorough investigation that not only unearths the statistical link but also sheds light on the potential implications of this unexpected connection. We urge further examination of this unorthodox relationship and propose avenues for future research to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy consumption on a global scale.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural and energy research has often been described as a tangled web of interconnected factors - a veritable cornucopia of complexity, if you will. In this pursuit of unraveling these threads, we stumble upon a serendipitous discovery: a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a pea in a soybean pod. Our study delves into the conundrum of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in the heartland of Ohio and the subtle and elusive dance of fossil fuel consumption on the idyllic islands of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
As the research community is well aware, correlations can often be like finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, locating that elusive soybean amidst the vast expanse of Ohio farmland. We were intrigued by the possibility of an unanticipated link between these seemingly divergent variables – akin to discovering that peas and carrots have been secretly conspiring to influence our dietary choices all along.
The agricultural landscape is indeed a fertile ground for surprise, much like a field of wildflowers that bloom in unexpected patterns. Similarly, the energy sector dances to its own rhythm, not unlike a lively tango of fossil fuel consumption, complete with its own twists and turns. Our study aims to shed light on this dance, not unlike unraveling a mystery novel, with each data point serving as a clue along the way.
Thus, armed with a plethora of data and statistical tools, we embarked on this scientific endeavor with the vigor of an aspiring chef trying to concoct the perfect recipe. We scrutinized years of USDA reports and delved into the labyrinthine corridors of the Energy Information Administration's archives to connect the dots between GMO soybean adoption and fossil fuel consumption. Our journey uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient, akin to finding a golden egg in the proverbial statistical haystack, with a significance level that rivals the most captivating plot twists in a mystery novel.
In a world where assumptions often lead to misinterpretations, this unconventional connection piqued our curiosity. We call upon the scholarly community to walk alongside us on this unorthodox path and embrace the curiosity to uncover the hidden handiwork of nature and human influence, much like deciphering the workings of a complex multi-layered cake. So, let us embark on this scientific escapade together and venture into the unexplored terrain where soybeans and fossil fuels whisper their secrets to those who dare to listen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to untangle the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, our intrepid team embarked on a journey worthy of a scientific odyssey. With a combination of statistical prowess and a willingness to traverse the vast expanse of data, we endeavored to shed light on this unusual connection.

First and foremost, our research utilized data spanning the years 2000 to 2021, sourced primarily from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration. The culmination of this data formed the cornerstone of our investigation, much like the essential ingredients in a recipe for a peculiarly scientific souffle. We meticulously combed through reports, databases, and virtual archives, akin to intrepid explorers delving deep into uncharted territory, in order to uncover the pertinent information necessary for our analysis.

The intertwining of variables related to GMO soybean adoption and fossil fuel consumption demanded a methodological approach as complex as a labyrinth - or perhaps, as perplexing as solving a convoluted riddle. Our approach involved an integration of both descriptive and inferential statistical methods, not unlike the delicate and harmonious fusion of flavors in a gourmet dish. This encompassed the use of correlation analysis to decipher the statistical relationship between GMO soybean adoption rates in Ohio and fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

We employed robust statistical software to crunch the numbers and scrutinize the data for patterns, trends, and deviations. Our team engaged in rigorous model fitting, like tailor-made suits designed to accentuate the quirks and nuances of the data, in order to identify the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables. This allowed us to uncover the compelling correlation coefficient that underscored the unexpected link between GMO soybeans and fossil fuel consumption.

Furthermore, our methodological approach involved rigorous sensitivity analyses, akin to stress-testing the resilience of a newly developed recipe under various cooking conditions, to ensure the robustness of our findings. We meticulously scrutinized outliers and potential confounding variables, much like discerning the subtle notes and undertones in a complex wine tasting, in order to minimize biases and strengthen the reliability of our results.

Through this systematic and at times whimsical approach, we sought to lay bare the hidden connections between seemingly disparate elements of agricultural practices and energy consumption. Our methodology can be likened to a delicate tapestry, woven with threads of data, statistical precision, and a sense of scientific adventure, as we set sail on the undulating waves of knowledge in pursuit of novel and unexpected revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9348841, r-squared of 0.8740083, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous analysis to elucidate this unconventional correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 with a striking significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021.

The research provides compelling evidence that the widespread use of GMO soybeans in Ohio may have unforeseen consequences on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In this academic pursuit, we undertook a thorough investigation that not only unearths the statistical link but also sheds light on the potential implications of this unexpected connection. We urge further examination of this unorthodox relationship and propose avenues for future research to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy consumption on a global scale.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of agricultural and energy research has often been described as a tangled web of interconnected factors - a veritable cornucopia of complexity, if you will. In this pursuit of unraveling these threads, we stumble upon a serendipitous discovery: a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a pea in a soybean pod. Our study delves into the conundrum of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in the heartland of Ohio and the subtle and elusive dance of fossil fuel consumption on the idyllic islands of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
As the research community is well aware, correlations can often be like finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, locating that elusive soybean amidst the vast expanse of Ohio farmland. We were intrigued by the possibility of an unanticipated link between these seemingly divergent variables – akin to discovering that peas and carrots have been secretly conspiring to influence our dietary choices all along.
The agricultural landscape is indeed a fertile ground for surprise, much like a field of wildflowers that bloom in unexpected patterns. Similarly, the energy sector dances to its own rhythm, not unlike a lively tango of fossil fuel consumption, complete with its own twists and turns. Our study aims to shed light on this dance, not unlike unraveling a mystery novel, with each data point serving as a clue along the way.
Thus, armed with a plethora of data and statistical tools, we embarked on this scientific endeavor with the vigor of an aspiring chef trying to concoct the perfect recipe. We scrutinized years of USDA reports and delved into the labyrinthine corridors of the Energy Information Administration's archives to connect the dots between GMO soybean adoption and fossil fuel consumption. Our journey uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient, akin to finding a golden egg in the proverbial statistical haystack, with a significance level that rivals the most captivating plot twists in a mystery novel.
In a world where assumptions often lead to misinterpretations, this unconventional connection piqued our curiosity. We call upon the scholarly community to walk alongside us on this unorthodox path and embrace the curiosity to uncover the hidden handiwork of nature and human influence, much like deciphering the workings of a complex multi-layered cake. So, let us embark on this scientific escapade together and venture into the unexplored terrain where soybeans and fossil fuels whisper their secrets to those who dare to listen.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**[[RESULTS]]**

Our investigation unearthed a striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9348841, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further attested to the robustness of this connection, with a value of 0.8740083, suggesting that approximately 87.4% of the variance in fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Ohio. Moreover, the significance level of p < 0.01 underscored the high confidence in the observed correlation, making it as clear as a freshly cleaned beaker in the lab.

**Figure 1** (To be added) - The scatterplot presents a visual representation of the strong correlation between GMO soybean adoption in Ohio and fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Much like the harmonious fusion of chemicals in a well-executed experiment, the scatterplot showcases the close relationship between these two variables, leaving little doubt about the nature of their association.

This discovery, akin to stumbling upon the missing puzzle piece in a scientific jigsaw, presents a conundrum that warrants further scientific scrutiny. The unexpected nature of this correlation prompts us to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this unorthodox relationship. As we reflect on the results of our study, we are reminded of the words of the great scientist Isaac Newton, who famously declared, “I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people.” In a similar vein, our findings highlight the intricate dance of nature and human influence, revealing a correlation that seems to defy conventional wisdom. It beckons us to explore the uncharted territories of agricultural and energy dynamics, much like intrepid explorers venturing into the heart of a scientific mystery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous analysis to elucidate this unconventional correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 with a striking significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021.

The research provides compelling evidence that the widespread use of GMO soybeans in Ohio may have unforeseen consequences on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In this academic pursuit, we undertook a thorough investigation that not only unearths the statistical link but also sheds light on the potential implications of this unexpected connection. We urge further examination of this unorthodox relationship and propose avenues for future research to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy consumption on a global scale.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we delve into the depths of the literature surrounding the curious correlation between GMO soybeans in Ohio and fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, we encounter a wealth of scholarly work that spans the realms of agriculture, energy, and everything in between. Smith (2010) provides valuable insights into the adoption of GMO soybeans in the Midwest, shedding light on the economic and environmental implications. Building upon this foundation, Doe (2015) uncovers the complex web of energy consumption patterns in small island nations, offering a nuanced perspective that encompasses the interplay of various factors. Jones (2018) further extends this discourse by examining the global dynamics of agricultural practices and their influence on energy demand, contributing to our understanding of this intricate tapestry.
Beyond the realm of scholarly articles, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a thought-provoking exploration of the modern agricultural landscape, delving into the far-reaching ramifications of our food choices. Similarly, "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein presents a compelling analysis of the interwoven nature of environmental challenges and economic systems, providing valuable context to the broader implications of agricultural practices on energy consumption.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Botany of Desire" by Michael Pollan and "The Overstory" by Richard Powers invite readers to contemplate the interconnectedness of plant life and human existence, weaving a narrative that resonates with the underlying theme of symbiotic relationships.
In our quest for unconventional wisdom, we found ourselves drawing inspiration from unexpected sources, including cartoons and children's shows that offer a whimsical yet insightful perspective on the natural world. From the educational prowess of "Magic School Bus" to the whimsical adventures of "SpongeBob SquarePants," these lighthearted yet informative narratives provided a refreshing lens through which to explore the intricate dance of plant genetics and energy dynamics.
And with that, we find ourselves at the crossroads of knowledge and whimsy, prepared to embark on a journey through the annals of research and beyond, where the serious and the lighthearted converge in a harmonious dance of scholarly discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation unearthed a striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9348841, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further attested to the robustness of this connection, with a value of 0.8740083, suggesting that approximately 87.4% of the variance in fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Ohio. Moreover, the significance level of p < 0.01 underscored the high confidence in the observed correlation, making it as clear as a freshly cleaned beaker in the lab.
(To be added) - The scatterplot presents a visual representation of the strong correlation between GMO soybean adoption in Ohio and fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Much like the harmonious fusion of chemicals in a well-executed experiment, the scatterplot showcases the close relationship between these two variables, leaving little doubt about the nature of their association.
This discovery, akin to stumbling upon the missing puzzle piece in a scientific jigsaw, presents a conundrum that warrants further scientific scrutiny. The unexpected nature of this correlation prompts us to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this unorthodox relationship. As we reflect on the results of our study, we are reminded of the words of the great scientist Isaac Newton, who famously declared, “I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people.” In a similar vein, our findings highlight the intricate dance of nature and human influence, revealing a correlation that seems to defy conventional wisdom. It beckons us to explore the uncharted territories of agricultural and energy dynamics, much like intrepid explorers venturing into the heart of a scientific mystery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study's findings support and extend the existing research, shedding light on the unexpected correlation between the adoption of GMO soybeans in Ohio and fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. As we navigate through the scholarly landscape, the literature paints a comprehensive tapestry adorned with intricate patterns and surprising motifs – much like a Jackson Pollock painting, we encounter splashes of unanticipated connections between seemingly disparate domains. Despite the seemingly outlandish association initially proposed, our results stand as an empirical testament to the strength of this correlation, affirming the recurrent theme of unexpected synergies in the natural and socio-economic world.

Drawing from Smith's (2010) astute analysis of the economic and environmental implications of GMO soybean adoption in the Midwest, our findings amplify the resonance of this theme, with 87.4% of the variance in fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines being explicable by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Ohio. This robust relationship resonates with the whispers of energy consumption patterns expounded by Doe (2015) and Jones (2018), echoing the profound interplay of agricultural practices and energy demand in a synchronized dance of statistical significance.

Picking up the whimsical thread from the literature review, our study irresistibly channels the educational prowess of "Magic School Bus," and a ''SpongeBob SquarePants" episode featuring Plankton's quest for energy, serving as a whimsical reminder of the intricate dance of energy dynamics in the natural world. With a correlation coefficient as unambiguous as the chemical reactions catalyzed in a rigorous experiment, our findings beckon to the "madness of people," as described by Newton, enticing us to unravel the enigmatic interconnection of agricultural practices and energy consumption, much like a scientific mystery waiting to be unveiled.

Unfurling the unexpected symphony of GMO soybeans and fossil fuel consumption, our study stirs a potent concoction, much like the fusion of chemicals in the lab, setting the stage for future explorations. In the spirit of scholarly camaraderie and whimsy, we invite fellow researchers to join us on this scientific escapade as we venture into uncharted territories, championing the harmony of knowledge and discovery in the pursuit of unraveling nature's most cryptic puzzles.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Ohio and Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous analysis to elucidate this unconventional correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 with a striking significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021.

The research provides compelling evidence that the widespread use of GMO soybeans in Ohio may have unforeseen consequences on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In this academic pursuit, we undertook a thorough investigation that not only unearths the statistical link but also sheds light on the potential implications of this unexpected connection. We urge further examination of this unorthodox relationship and propose avenues for future research to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy consumption on a global scale.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of agricultural and energy research has often been described as a tangled web of interconnected factors - a veritable cornucopia of complexity, if you will. In this pursuit of unraveling these threads, we stumble upon a serendipitous discovery: a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a pea in a soybean pod. Our study delves into the conundrum of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in the heartland of Ohio and the subtle and elusive dance of fossil fuel consumption on the idyllic islands of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
As the research community is well aware, correlations can often be like finding a needle in a haystack, or in this case, locating that elusive soybean amidst the vast expanse of Ohio farmland. We were intrigued by the possibility of an unanticipated link between these seemingly divergent variables – akin to discovering that peas and carrots have been secretly conspiring to influence our dietary choices all along.
The agricultural landscape is indeed a fertile ground for surprise, much like a field of wildflowers that bloom in unexpected patterns. Similarly, the energy sector dances to its own rhythm, not unlike a lively tango of fossil fuel consumption, complete with its own twists and turns. Our study aims to shed light on this dance, not unlike unraveling a mystery novel, with each data point serving as a clue along the way.
Thus, armed with a plethora of data and statistical tools, we embarked on this scientific endeavor with the vigor of an aspiring chef trying to concoct the perfect recipe. We scrutinized years of USDA reports and delved into the labyrinthine corridors of the Energy Information Administration's archives to connect the dots between GMO soybean adoption and fossil fuel consumption. Our journey uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient, akin to finding a golden egg in the proverbial statistical haystack, with a significance level that rivals the most captivating plot twists in a mystery novel.
In a world where assumptions often lead to misinterpretations, this unconventional connection piqued our curiosity. We call upon the scholarly community to walk alongside us on this unorthodox path and embrace the curiosity to uncover the hidden handiwork of nature and human influence, much like deciphering the workings of a complex multi-layered cake. So, let us embark on this scientific escapade together and venture into the unexplored terrain where soybeans and fossil fuels whisper their secrets to those who dare to listen.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation unearthed a striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9348841, indicating a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further attested to the robustness of this connection, with a value of 0.8740083, suggesting that approximately 87.4% of the variance in fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines can be explained by the adoption of GMO soybeans in Ohio. Moreover, the significance level of p < 0.01 underscored the high confidence in the observed correlation, making it as clear as a freshly cleaned beaker in the lab.
(To be added) - The scatterplot presents a visual representation of the strong correlation between GMO soybean adoption in Ohio and fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Much like the harmonious fusion of chemicals in a well-executed experiment, the scatterplot showcases the close relationship between these two variables, leaving little doubt about the nature of their association.
This discovery, akin to stumbling upon the missing puzzle piece in a scientific jigsaw, presents a conundrum that warrants further scientific scrutiny. The unexpected nature of this correlation prompts us to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this unorthodox relationship. As we reflect on the results of our study, we are reminded of the words of the great scientist Isaac Newton, who famously declared, “I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people.” In a similar vein, our findings highlight the intricate dance of nature and human influence, revealing a correlation that seems to defy conventional wisdom. It beckons us to explore the uncharted territories of agricultural and energy dynamics, much like intrepid explorers venturing into the heart of a scientific mystery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study's findings illuminate the captivating correlation between GMO soybean adoption in Ohio and fossil fuel consumption in the pockets of tropical paradise in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. It's as if Pandora's box has been opened, revealing a fascinating link that has eluded conventional agricultural and energy paradigms. The statistical evidence presented, backed by the robust correlation coefficient and the resounding significance level, stands as solid as the periodic table itself, leaving little room for doubt.

This unanticipated relationship is reminiscent of a scientific Easter egg hunt, where the surprise is not just in finding the eggs but in realizing they are connected to an entirely different hunt. It beckons us to ponder the intricate interplay of soybeans and fossil fuels with the same fascination as a chemistry experiment producing unexpected reactions.

As we close this chapter, we echo the sentiment of the great minds before us and propose that further research is unwarranted in this area. After all, when the soybeans and fossil fuels start dancing the tango, it's time to sit back and enjoy the show.

In essence, we leave the scientific community with a final thought: sometimes, in the labyrinth of data and variables, the most intriguing discoveries stem from the most improbable connections. It's akin to finding the missing puzzle piece, only to realize it belongs to an entirely different puzzle altogether. And on that note, this paper concludes that there is no need for further research in this area. Case closed, like a well-kept laboratory experiment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Agroecological Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Sustainable Agriculture and Ecological Research (SSAER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bean There, Done That: Investigating the Link Between GMO Soybeans in Ohio and Fossil Fuel Consumption in Saint Vincent/Grenadines with an abstract of This study delves into the intertwined relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) soybeans in Ohio and the consumption of fossil fuels in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Using comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a rigorous analysis to elucidate this unconventional correlation. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9348841 with a striking significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021.
The research provides compelling evidence that the widespread use of GMO soybeans in Ohio may have unforeseen consequences on fossil fuel consumption in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. In this academic pursuit, we undertook a thorough investigation that not only unearths the statistical link but also sheds light on the potential implications of this unexpected connection. We urge further examination of this unorthodox relationship and propose avenues for future research to cultivate a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy consumption on a global scale.

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans, Ohio, fossil fuel consumption, Saint Vincent, Grenadines, correlation, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, agricultural practices, energy consumption, global scale analysis, genetically modified organism, soybean adoption, unconventional correlation, unforeseen consequences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Ohio
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Ohio that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Ohio

Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines

Correlation r = 0.9348841 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8740083 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Ohio) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-10. 0.0000000001887361813514817600
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.9E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,298,401,148 random variables You don't actually need 5 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in soybeans in Ohio (GMO soybeans %)48647374767782878983868586899091919191958896
Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines (Billion kWh)0.0650.0750.0750.0820.0870.0998380.1040.1112760.1085290.1090.110.1070.1070.1120.1217010.1209080.1280570.1211970.1175090.120.1139360.121228




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([48,64,73,74,76,77,82,87,89,83,86,85,86,89,90,91,91,91,91,95,88,96,])
array_2 = np.array([0.065,0.075,0.075,0.082,0.087,0.099838,0.104,0.111276,0.108529,0.109,0.11,0.107,0.107,0.112,0.121701,0.120908,0.128057,0.121197,0.117509,0.12,0.113936,0.121228,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Ohio"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Saint Vincent/Grenadines"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 2407 · Black Variable ID: 824 · Red Variable ID: 23937
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0