about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,361 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and the second variable is Google searches for 'Vihart'.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As fewer philosophers emerged, there were less abstract discussions about the nature of reality, leading to a metaphysical crisis that dampened interest in Vihart's mind-bending mathematical and scientific videos.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ]: In a dimly lit lecture hall, a small group of students stands in proud procession, each holding their Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies. The stage is adorned with classical columns, exuding a solemn and scholarly ambiance. Light streams in through tall windows, casting a warm glow on the graduates as they accept their well-earned diplomas. On the periphery of the scene, an illuminated computer screen displays a graph depicting a decline in Google searches for 'Vihart', starkly highlighting the dwindling interest in the mind-bending videos of the renowned creator. Outside the hall, the ambiance is reflective, and the absence of philosophical discussions is palpable, casting a shadow over the once fervent curiosity for Vihart's thought-provoking content. The contrast between the pride of academic achievement and the waning enthusiasm for intellectual pursuits creates a poignant and thought-provoking juxtaposition, inviting the viewer to contemplate the shifting tides of scholarly inquiry and the multifaceted nature of human curiosity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art A Discovery magazine cover image Realistic Minimalism a meme
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart', in the following situation: As fewer philosophers emerged, there were less abstract discussions about the nature of reality, leading to a metaphysical crisis that dampened interest in Vihart's mind-bending mathematical and scientific videos.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a lecture hall, a small group of students proudly receive their Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies, while outside the hall, a computer screen shows a decline in Google searches for 'Vihart'. The atmosphere is reflective, and the absence of philosophical discussions is palpable, affecting the curiosity for Vihart's mind-bending videos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a lecture hall, a small group of students proudly receive their Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies, while outside the hall, a computer screen shows a decline in Google searches for 'Vihart'. The atmosphere is reflective, and the absence of philosophical discussions is palpable, affecting the curiosity for Vihart's mind-bending videos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ]: In a dimly lit lecture hall, a small group of students stands in proud procession, each holding their Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies. The stage is adorned with classical columns, exuding a solemn and scholarly ambiance. Light streams in through tall windows, casting a warm glow on the graduates as they accept their well-earned diplomas. On the periphery of the scene, an illuminated computer screen displays a graph depicting a decline in Google searches for 'Vihart', starkly highlighting the dwindling interest in the mind-bending videos of the renowned creator. Outside the hall, the ambiance is reflective, and the absence of philosophical discussions is palpable, casting a shadow over the once fervent curiosity for Vihart's thought-provoking content. The contrast between the pride of academic achievement and the waning enthusiasm for intellectual pursuits creates a poignant and thought-provoking juxtaposition, inviting the viewer to contemplate the shifting tides of scholarly inquiry and the multifaceted nature of human curiosity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humerus responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies caused Vihart (Google searches for 'Vihart') to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit

The Journal of Eccentric Inquiries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Despite the seemingly disparate subjects, our research team discovered an astonishingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. We couldn't help but wonder whether students exploring profound philosophical questions and religious concepts are more inclined to seek out the whimsical and intellectual musings of the enigmatic Vihart on the internet. The intersection of these seemingly unrelated areas has left us both amused and bemused, prompting us to further investigate the intriguing connection between the pursuit of knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Despite the seemingly disparate subjects, our research team discovered an astonishingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. We couldn't help but wonder whether students exploring profound philosophical questions and religious concepts are more inclined to seek out the whimsical and intellectual musings of the enigmatic Vihart on the internet. The intersection of these seemingly unrelated areas has left us both amused and bemused, prompting us to further investigate the intriguing connection between the pursuit of knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

In the ever-expanding digital cosmos of the 21st century, the intertwining threads of knowledge and curiosity manifest in ways that mirror the whimsical whims of a proverbial cat playing with a ball of yarn. As researchers and ponderers of a myriad of intellectual pursuits, we found ourselves captivated by an arcane correlation that brought together the abstruse domains of Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies with the enigmatic allure of Google searches for 'Vihart'. While the casual observer may raise an incredulous eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these subjects, our team's ensuing investigation unveiled a correlation coefficient so high, it made our collective jaws drop like a clumsily executed magic trick.

One can't help but wonder - are budding philosophers and theologians, in their fervent quest for wisdom and cosmic understanding, also drawn to the captivating musings of Vihart, hidden amidst the digital labyrinth of the World Wide Web? Or, could there be an unforeseen cosmic dance of algorithmic happenstance at play, pulling these diverse vectors of inquiry into an inexplicable unity, like a cosmic tug-o-war between rational discourse and digital whimsy?

It is in this peculiar nexus of intertwining disciplines that our research embarks on a journey of academic inquiry, astutely navigating the byzantine corridors of Google search trends and the venerable halls of philosophical and religious pedagogy.

And thus, we present our findings, a whimsical waltz through the corridors of academic inquiry, where the hallowed whispers of Socrates and Descartes shake hands with the digital echoes of 'Vihart', in a peculiar pursuit of puzzling revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Despite the seemingly disparate subjects, our research team discovered an astonishingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. We couldn't help but wonder whether students exploring profound philosophical questions and religious concepts are more inclined to seek out the whimsical and intellectual musings of the enigmatic Vihart on the internet. The intersection of these seemingly unrelated areas has left us both amused and bemused, prompting us to further investigate the intriguing connection between the pursuit of knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the ever-expanding digital cosmos of the 21st century, the intertwining threads of knowledge and curiosity manifest in ways that mirror the whimsical whims of a proverbial cat playing with a ball of yarn. As researchers and ponderers of a myriad of intellectual pursuits, we found ourselves captivated by an arcane correlation that brought together the abstruse domains of Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies with the enigmatic allure of Google searches for 'Vihart'. While the casual observer may raise an incredulous eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these subjects, our team's ensuing investigation unveiled a correlation coefficient so high, it made our collective jaws drop like a clumsily executed magic trick.
One can't help but wonder - are budding philosophers and theologians, in their fervent quest for wisdom and cosmic understanding, also drawn to the captivating musings of Vihart, hidden amidst the digital labyrinth of the World Wide Web? Or, could there be an unforeseen cosmic dance of algorithmic happenstance at play, pulling these diverse vectors of inquiry into an inexplicable unity, like a cosmic tug-o-war between rational discourse and digital whimsy?
It is in this peculiar nexus of intertwining disciplines that our research embarks on a journey of academic inquiry, astutely navigating the byzantine corridors of Google search trends and the venerable halls of philosophical and religious pedagogy.
And thus, we present our findings, a whimsical waltz through the corridors of academic inquiry, where the hallowed whispers of Socrates and Descartes shake hands with the digital echoes of 'Vihart', in a peculiar pursuit of puzzling revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' is an enigmatic puzzle that has piqued the curiosity of both scholars and internet aficionados alike. While traditionally the pursuit of Philosophy and religious studies may seem worlds apart from the quirky musings of 'Vihart' on the internet, our investigation has uncovered a fascinating correlation that demands closer examination.

In "A Study of Philosophical Trends in Modern Education," Smith and Doe delve into the rising popularity of Philosophy as a major among undergraduate students, attributing it to a growing interest in critical thinking and the exploration of fundamental questions about existence and knowledge. Conversely, Jones' work "The Sociology of Religion" highlights the enduring significance of religious studies in academia, elucidating the enduring appeal of understanding spiritual beliefs and practices in diverse cultures.

However, as we meticulously combed through the annals of literature, we found ourselves venturing into unexpected territory. In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," Douglas Adams humorously explores the cosmic and existential conundrums, perhaps hinting at the multidimensional nature of human curiosity that extends beyond the bounds of traditional academic disciplines. Similarly, the enigmatic musings of 'Vihart' on the internet bear a striking resemblance to the abstract and contemplative nature of philosophical inquiries, drawing us into a whimsical realm of mathematical doodles and brain-teasing revelations.

In the digital realm, the perplexing allure of 'Vihart' echoes the quizzical fascination with internet memes such as "The Most Interesting Man in the World" and "Distracted Boyfriend." These memes, much like 'Vihart's' captivating content, draw attention through humor and intellectual engagement, transcending conventional barriers of knowledge dissemination and leaving a trail of online intrigue.

As we navigate through this peculiar confluence of disciplines and digital curiosities, we are reminded of the whimsical dance of knowledge and amusement that continually challenges our preconceived notions, leading us to ponder the ever-intriguing question - is there a cosmic connection between the pursuit of profound wisdom and the siren call of internet oddities? Only time, and further research, will reveal the whimsical secrets that lie beyond the enigmatic nexus of philosophy, religion, and peculiar googling.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Despite the seemingly disparate subjects, our research team discovered an astonishingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. We couldn't help but wonder whether students exploring profound philosophical questions and religious concepts are more inclined to seek out the whimsical and intellectual musings of the enigmatic Vihart on the internet. The intersection of these seemingly unrelated areas has left us both amused and bemused, prompting us to further investigate the intriguing connection between the pursuit of knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the ever-expanding digital cosmos of the 21st century, the intertwining threads of knowledge and curiosity manifest in ways that mirror the whimsical whims of a proverbial cat playing with a ball of yarn. As researchers and ponderers of a myriad of intellectual pursuits, we found ourselves captivated by an arcane correlation that brought together the abstruse domains of Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies with the enigmatic allure of Google searches for 'Vihart'. While the casual observer may raise an incredulous eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these subjects, our team's ensuing investigation unveiled a correlation coefficient so high, it made our collective jaws drop like a clumsily executed magic trick.
One can't help but wonder - are budding philosophers and theologians, in their fervent quest for wisdom and cosmic understanding, also drawn to the captivating musings of Vihart, hidden amidst the digital labyrinth of the World Wide Web? Or, could there be an unforeseen cosmic dance of algorithmic happenstance at play, pulling these diverse vectors of inquiry into an inexplicable unity, like a cosmic tug-o-war between rational discourse and digital whimsy?
It is in this peculiar nexus of intertwining disciplines that our research embarks on a journey of academic inquiry, astutely navigating the byzantine corridors of Google search trends and the venerable halls of philosophical and religious pedagogy.
And thus, we present our findings, a whimsical waltz through the corridors of academic inquiry, where the hallowed whispers of Socrates and Descartes shake hands with the digital echoes of 'Vihart', in a peculiar pursuit of puzzling revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious correlation between the issuance of Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for "Vihart", our research team embarked on a whimsical yet methodical journey across the digital savannah of the internet. With a conspiratorial nod to the National Center for Education Statistics and a fervent embrace of the capricious whims of Google Trends, we sought to unravel the enigma that lay at the intersection of scholarly pursuit and digital curiosity.

Firstly, we gallivanted through the verdant pastures of the National Center for Education Statistics, where we gathered data on the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies from the years 2012 to 2021. Like intrepid explorers wielding the compass of statistical prowess, we navigated the labyrinthine corridors of educational data, sifting through the abundant harvests of degree conferrals in these venerable disciplines.

With this trove of academic knowledge in hand, we set our sights on the fabled peaks of Google Trends, where we sought to trace the meandering trails of curiosity that led seekers of knowledge to embark on the quest for enlightenment through the ethereal oracle of 'Vihart'. Much like digital anthropologists, we combed through the virtual annals of Google searches, uncovering the temporal ebbs and flows of interest in this enigmatic figure, the very embodiment of intellectual curiosity and whimsy.

Once we had amassed these twin pillars of data - the arcane conferrals of Bachelor's degrees and the mercurial undulations of Google searches - it was time to unleash the formidable force of statistical analysis upon these disparate yet intriguing strands of information. With the sage guidance of statistical software at our fingertips, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. As our alpha and beta whirred and whizzed through the data, the emergence of a remarkably high correlation coefficient left us more amazed than a magician who had accidentally pulled a rabbit out of an unsuspecting hat.

To ascertain the veracity of this uncanny correlation, we dutifully subjected our findings to the scrutiny of hypothesis testing, rigorously calculating the p-value to discern the statistical significance of the relationship uncovered. Lo and behold, the p-value shimmered before us in all its glory, signaling a level of statistical significance that could make even the most seasoned researcher do a quizzical double-take.

In essence, our methodology was akin to a whimsical dance between the ancient traditions of scholarly inquiry and the capricious rhythms of digital exploration, culminating in the revelation of a correlation that defied the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry. With methodological rigor and a touch of digital whimsy, we cast a spotlight onto the hitherto obscured nexus of academic pursuit and internet curiosity, unraveling a puzzle that beckons further investigation, much like a riddle whispered by the virtual winds of the digital realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9669835, r-squared of 0.9350571, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Despite the seemingly disparate subjects, our research team discovered an astonishingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. We couldn't help but wonder whether students exploring profound philosophical questions and religious concepts are more inclined to seek out the whimsical and intellectual musings of the enigmatic Vihart on the internet. The intersection of these seemingly unrelated areas has left us both amused and bemused, prompting us to further investigate the intriguing connection between the pursuit of knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
In the ever-expanding digital cosmos of the 21st century, the intertwining threads of knowledge and curiosity manifest in ways that mirror the whimsical whims of a proverbial cat playing with a ball of yarn. As researchers and ponderers of a myriad of intellectual pursuits, we found ourselves captivated by an arcane correlation that brought together the abstruse domains of Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies with the enigmatic allure of Google searches for 'Vihart'. While the casual observer may raise an incredulous eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these subjects, our team's ensuing investigation unveiled a correlation coefficient so high, it made our collective jaws drop like a clumsily executed magic trick.
One can't help but wonder - are budding philosophers and theologians, in their fervent quest for wisdom and cosmic understanding, also drawn to the captivating musings of Vihart, hidden amidst the digital labyrinth of the World Wide Web? Or, could there be an unforeseen cosmic dance of algorithmic happenstance at play, pulling these diverse vectors of inquiry into an inexplicable unity, like a cosmic tug-o-war between rational discourse and digital whimsy?
It is in this peculiar nexus of intertwining disciplines that our research embarks on a journey of academic inquiry, astutely navigating the byzantine corridors of Google search trends and the venerable halls of philosophical and religious pedagogy.
And thus, we present our findings, a whimsical waltz through the corridors of academic inquiry, where the hallowed whispers of Socrates and Descartes shake hands with the digital echoes of 'Vihart', in a peculiar pursuit of puzzling revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' yielded surprising and, dare I say, baffling results. The data analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 with an r-squared value of 0.9350571, indicating an exceptionally strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our team had to do a double-take and make sure we were not inadvertently swept into a digital whirlwind of inexplicable coincidence.

Furthermore, the statistical analysis unveiled a highly significant p-value of < 0.01, providing unequivocal evidence of the robust association between these disparate dimensions of intellectual exploration. In simpler terms, it's akin to discovering a hidden connection between the periodic table and a recipe for apple pie – utterly unexpected, yet undeniably captivating.

As promised, Figure 1 displays a scatterplot depicting the pronounced positive correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Behold the visual manifestation of this symbiotic relationship, where the pursuit of philosophical acumen dances with the digital quest for intellectual whimsy.

In essence, our findings beg the question: are the seekers of erudition and existential insight also aficionados of Vihart's digitally rendered ruminations? Or does the virtual web of coincidences possess an algorithmic wizardry that merges these disparate domains into an unexpected alliance?

The astonishing correlation between the confounding realms of academia and digital curiosity has left our research team both bemused and intrigued, urging us to delve deeper into the enigmatic nexus of human inquiry and digital fascination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Despite the seemingly disparate subjects, our research team discovered an astonishingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. We couldn't help but wonder whether students exploring profound philosophical questions and religious concepts are more inclined to seek out the whimsical and intellectual musings of the enigmatic Vihart on the internet. The intersection of these seemingly unrelated areas has left us both amused and bemused, prompting us to further investigate the intriguing connection between the pursuit of knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' is an enigmatic puzzle that has piqued the curiosity of both scholars and internet aficionados alike. While traditionally the pursuit of Philosophy and religious studies may seem worlds apart from the quirky musings of 'Vihart' on the internet, our investigation has uncovered a fascinating correlation that demands closer examination.
In "A Study of Philosophical Trends in Modern Education," Smith and Doe delve into the rising popularity of Philosophy as a major among undergraduate students, attributing it to a growing interest in critical thinking and the exploration of fundamental questions about existence and knowledge. Conversely, Jones' work "The Sociology of Religion" highlights the enduring significance of religious studies in academia, elucidating the enduring appeal of understanding spiritual beliefs and practices in diverse cultures.
However, as we meticulously combed through the annals of literature, we found ourselves venturing into unexpected territory. In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," Douglas Adams humorously explores the cosmic and existential conundrums, perhaps hinting at the multidimensional nature of human curiosity that extends beyond the bounds of traditional academic disciplines. Similarly, the enigmatic musings of 'Vihart' on the internet bear a striking resemblance to the abstract and contemplative nature of philosophical inquiries, drawing us into a whimsical realm of mathematical doodles and brain-teasing revelations.
In the digital realm, the perplexing allure of 'Vihart' echoes the quizzical fascination with internet memes such as "The Most Interesting Man in the World" and "Distracted Boyfriend." These memes, much like 'Vihart's' captivating content, draw attention through humor and intellectual engagement, transcending conventional barriers of knowledge dissemination and leaving a trail of online intrigue.
As we navigate through this peculiar confluence of disciplines and digital curiosities, we are reminded of the whimsical dance of knowledge and amusement that continually challenges our preconceived notions, leading us to ponder the ever-intriguing question - is there a cosmic connection between the pursuit of profound wisdom and the siren call of internet oddities? Only time, and further research, will reveal the whimsical secrets that lie beyond the enigmatic nexus of philosophy, religion, and peculiar googling.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' yielded surprising and, dare I say, baffling results. The data analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 with an r-squared value of 0.9350571, indicating an exceptionally strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our team had to do a double-take and make sure we were not inadvertently swept into a digital whirlwind of inexplicable coincidence.
Furthermore, the statistical analysis unveiled a highly significant p-value of < 0.01, providing unequivocal evidence of the robust association between these disparate dimensions of intellectual exploration. In simpler terms, it's akin to discovering a hidden connection between the periodic table and a recipe for apple pie – utterly unexpected, yet undeniably captivating.
As promised, Figure 1 displays a scatterplot depicting the pronounced positive correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Behold the visual manifestation of this symbiotic relationship, where the pursuit of philosophical acumen dances with the digital quest for intellectual whimsy.
In essence, our findings beg the question: are the seekers of erudition and existential insight also aficionados of Vihart's digitally rendered ruminations? Or does the virtual web of coincidences possess an algorithmic wizardry that merges these disparate domains into an unexpected alliance?
The astonishing correlation between the confounding realms of academia and digital curiosity has left our research team both bemused and intrigued, urging us to delve deeper into the enigmatic nexus of human inquiry and digital fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The striking correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' has left our research team both mystified and amused. At first glance, the connection between deep philosophical contemplation and seemingly lighthearted internet pursuits, akin to discovering a cryptic link between Pythagoras' theorem and a recipe for tiramisu, appeared more whimsical than substantial. However, our results not only support, but also augment the previous research findings.

Returning to our literature review, where we nonchalantly traversed through the vast expanse of scholarly discourse and an unexpected meeting with Douglas Adams, we found that the rising popularity of Philosophy as an undergraduate major, as expounded by Smith and Doe, dovetailed neatly with our findings. The enduring relevance of religious studies, as emphasized by Jones, also echoed our results, reinforcing the intricate interplay between academic pursuits and the enigmatic allure of 'Vihart' on the internet.

The peculiar connection between 'Vihart' and our traditional academic disciplines harkens back to the multidimensional nature of human curiosity, propelling us into the lively dance between profound wisdom and the siren call of internet oddities. This peculiar dance, akin to a whimsical waltz between the profound and the playful, has not only piqued our curiosity, but has also spurred us on to further untangle the perplexing web of human inquiry and digital fascination.

Our findings lend credence to the notion that individuals delving into philosophical and religious inquiries might also find themselves drawn to the intellectually engaging and curious content presented by 'Vihart.' This unexpected connection further underscores the intricacies of human intellectual pursuits, potentially revealing a new avenue for understanding the complex facets of knowledge acquisition and digital engagement.

In essence, our research not only sheds light on the unexpected correlation between seemingly disparate domains, but also beckons fellow scholars and enthusiasts alike to ponder the whimsical ways in which human curiosity and intellectual exploration intertwine. After all, who would have thought that the pursuit of profound knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities could be so intricately and inexplicably intertwined? As we continue to unravel the enigmatic nexus of philosophy, religion, and peculiar googling, we invite others to join us in this delightful and unexpected scholarly pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and Google searches for 'Vihart'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Despite the seemingly disparate subjects, our research team discovered an astonishingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. We couldn't help but wonder whether students exploring profound philosophical questions and religious concepts are more inclined to seek out the whimsical and intellectual musings of the enigmatic Vihart on the internet. The intersection of these seemingly unrelated areas has left us both amused and bemused, prompting us to further investigate the intriguing connection between the pursuit of knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the ever-expanding digital cosmos of the 21st century, the intertwining threads of knowledge and curiosity manifest in ways that mirror the whimsical whims of a proverbial cat playing with a ball of yarn. As researchers and ponderers of a myriad of intellectual pursuits, we found ourselves captivated by an arcane correlation that brought together the abstruse domains of Bachelor's degrees in Philosophy and religious studies with the enigmatic allure of Google searches for 'Vihart'. While the casual observer may raise an incredulous eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these subjects, our team's ensuing investigation unveiled a correlation coefficient so high, it made our collective jaws drop like a clumsily executed magic trick.
One can't help but wonder - are budding philosophers and theologians, in their fervent quest for wisdom and cosmic understanding, also drawn to the captivating musings of Vihart, hidden amidst the digital labyrinth of the World Wide Web? Or, could there be an unforeseen cosmic dance of algorithmic happenstance at play, pulling these diverse vectors of inquiry into an inexplicable unity, like a cosmic tug-o-war between rational discourse and digital whimsy?
It is in this peculiar nexus of intertwining disciplines that our research embarks on a journey of academic inquiry, astutely navigating the byzantine corridors of Google search trends and the venerable halls of philosophical and religious pedagogy.
And thus, we present our findings, a whimsical waltz through the corridors of academic inquiry, where the hallowed whispers of Socrates and Descartes shake hands with the digital echoes of 'Vihart', in a peculiar pursuit of puzzling revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' yielded surprising and, dare I say, baffling results. The data analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 with an r-squared value of 0.9350571, indicating an exceptionally strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our team had to do a double-take and make sure we were not inadvertently swept into a digital whirlwind of inexplicable coincidence.
Furthermore, the statistical analysis unveiled a highly significant p-value of < 0.01, providing unequivocal evidence of the robust association between these disparate dimensions of intellectual exploration. In simpler terms, it's akin to discovering a hidden connection between the periodic table and a recipe for apple pie – utterly unexpected, yet undeniably captivating.
As promised, Figure 1 displays a scatterplot depicting the pronounced positive correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Behold the visual manifestation of this symbiotic relationship, where the pursuit of philosophical acumen dances with the digital quest for intellectual whimsy.
In essence, our findings beg the question: are the seekers of erudition and existential insight also aficionados of Vihart's digitally rendered ruminations? Or does the virtual web of coincidences possess an algorithmic wizardry that merges these disparate domains into an unexpected alliance?
The astonishing correlation between the confounding realms of academia and digital curiosity has left our research team both bemused and intrigued, urging us to delve deeper into the enigmatic nexus of human inquiry and digital fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings have brought to light a correlation so unexpected and uncanny that it rivals the plot twists of a gripping mystery novel. The robust relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart' has undoubtedly left us in a state of bewilderment akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in one's backyard.

While the implications of this correlation may seem as elusive as the answers to life's deepest questions, we can't help but indulge in a touch of whimsy and ponder if Vihart's musings serve as a digital oasis for seekers of intellectual enlightenment, offering a respite from the weighty tomes of philosophical and religious discourse.

As we take our metaphorical bow, it is with a twinge of reluctance that we bid adieu to this peculiar pursuit of puzzling revelations. Alas, like the enigmatic allure of 'Vihart' herself, some mysteries are better left as curious curiosities, lest we find ourselves tangled in the digital labyrinth of endless conjecture and whimsy.

Therefore, in the spirit of both intellectual acumen and digital fascination, we declare with a touch of playful finality that no further research is needed in this extraordinary intersection of human inquiry and digital enchantment. For as the adage goes, some connections are best left to the capricious whims of chance and enigma.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Inquiries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Esoteric Enigmas and Curious Curiosities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pondering Philosophy, Religion, and Peculiar Googling: A Puzzling Pursuit with an abstract of This paper delves into the curious correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'Vihart'. Despite the seemingly disparate subjects, our research team discovered an astonishingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9669835 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. We couldn't help but wonder whether students exploring profound philosophical questions and religious concepts are more inclined to seek out the whimsical and intellectual musings of the enigmatic Vihart on the internet. The intersection of these seemingly unrelated areas has left us both amused and bemused, prompting us to further investigate the intriguing connection between the pursuit of knowledge and the allure of internet curiosities.

ChatGPT:

Bachelor's degrees, Philosophy, religious studies, Google searches, 'Vihart', correlation, coefficient, p-value, 2012-2021, philosophical questions, religious concepts, internet curiosities

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy
Detailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Philosophy and religious studies
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy

Google searches for 'Vihart'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Vihart' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Vihart'

Correlation r = 0.9669835 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9350571 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Vihart') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.0E-6. 0.0000049956461236367526000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.0005% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 200,174 random variables You don't actually need 200 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy (Degrees awarded)14104143381377612925121331174011872119811189811988
Google searches for 'Vihart' (Rel. search volume)38.542.528.66671813.833311.1667107.333335.166674.16667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([14104,14338,13776,12925,12133,11740,11872,11981,11898,11988,])
array_2 = np.array([38.5,42.5,28.6667,18,13.8333,11.1667,10,7.33333,5.16667,4.16667,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in Philosophy"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Vihart'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 2361 · Black Variable ID: 1287 · Red Variable ID: 1452
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0