about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,349 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the second variable is Petroluem consumption in Pakistan.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the psychiatric aides in Minnesota multiplied, their therapeutic energy snowballed, leading to a surge in overall global happiness. This unexpected spike in positivity somehow sparked a chain reaction, creating a wave of inexplicable joy reaching all the way to Pakistan. The newfound, unexplainable love for petroleum products has ignited a fuel frenzy, proving that when it comes to the power of happiness, it's truly a gas! Who would have thought that the key to Pakistan's petroleum consumption lay in the whims of Minnesota's psychiatric superheroes? Or perhaps it's just a case of "minne-soda" pressing all the right buttons!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a small, serene town in Minnesota, with a psychiatric facility at its center. Show a group of psychiatric aides gathered, exuding an unspoken aura of collective psychic energy. At the same time, depict a bustling Pakistani city with people filling up their cars at a local gas station. The image should convey the subtle shift in the drivers' petrol consumption habits as if influenced by an invisible force from halfway across the world. Create a visual representation of the connection between the psychic energy in Minnesota and the changes in petroleum use in Pakistan. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Symbolism inspired by bauhaus A scene from Skyrim Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan, in the following situation: As the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota fluctuates, so too does the collective psychic energy of the state. This energy ripples across the globe, inadvertently affecting the driving habits of individuals in Pakistan. It's a case of Midwestern mental waves causing shifts in petrol preferences halfway across the world. The power of the mind knows no borders, not even when it comes to petroleum consumption!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet town in Minnesota, a group of psychiatric aides gather at a mental health facility, where the number of aides varies from day to day. Their presence creates a palpable sense of collective psychic energy, which seems to radiate outwards. Meanwhile, in a bustling city in Pakistan, people fill up their cars with petrol at a local gas station. As the psychic energy from Minnesota makes its way across the globe, the drivers' petrol consumption habits seem to subtly shift, as if influenced by an invisible force. The connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables becomes apparent in this unusual interplay between Midwestern mental waves and shifts in petroleum use halfway around the world.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet town in Minnesota, a group of psychiatric aides gather at a mental health facility, where the number of aides varies from day to day. Their presence creates a palpable sense of collective psychic energy, which seems to radiate outwards. Meanwhile, in a bustling city in Pakistan, people fill up their cars with petrol at a local gas station. As the psychic energy from Minnesota makes its way across the globe, the drivers' petrol consumption habits seem to subtly shift, as if influenced by an invisible force. The connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables becomes apparent in this unusual interplay between Midwestern mental waves and shifts in petroleum use halfway around the world. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a small, serene town in Minnesota, with a psychiatric facility at its center. Show a group of psychiatric aides gathered, exuding an unspoken aura of collective psychic energy. At the same time, depict a bustling Pakistani city with people filling up their cars at a local gas station. The image should convey the subtle shift in the drivers' petrol consumption habits as if influenced by an invisible force from halfway across the world. Create a visual representation of the connection between the psychic energy in Minnesota and the changes in petroleum use in Pakistan.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota caused Petroluem consumption in Pakistan to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan

Journal of Unconventional Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2018. The apparent linkage between mental health care support staff and petrol usage in a different part of the world has perplexed and entertained our team in equal measure. The findings raise numerous eyebrow-raising questions and innovative approaches for future multi-disciplinary investigation. Our research serves as a light-hearted reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we least expect it.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2018. The apparent linkage between mental health care support staff and petrol usage in a different part of the world has perplexed and entertained our team in equal measure. The findings raise numerous eyebrow-raising questions and innovative approaches for future multi-disciplinary investigation. Our research serves as a light-hearted reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we least expect it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of academic research, serendipitous discoveries are as elusive as they are exhilarating. It is with this spirit of curiosity and amusement that we present our findings on the unlikely connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan. What began as a lighthearted investigation soon unfolded into an enthralling tale of correlation and causation that takes our imagination on a wild ride through the landscapes of mental health care and fossil fuel consumption.

The premise of this research may seem as improbable as a penguin wearing a tuxedo at a tropical beach, but our team's data-driven exploration has revealed some rather surprising insights. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a chuckle or two, as we consider the uncharted territory where the realms of mental health support and petrol usage collide.

As we plunged into the depths of statistical analysis, armed with spreadsheets and calculators instead of swords and shields, we were met with an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8871716, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptics raise an intrigued eyebrow. The statistical significance of this unearthed link between seemingly disparate phenomena is enough to make even the most stern-faced academics break into a bemused smile.

However, amid the lightheartedness of our revelations, we recognize the potential ramifications of our findings. The unexpected association between psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption beckons us to ponder the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of society. It is a reminder that in the grand tapestry of human existence, the threads of correlation can weave a whimsical narrative that transcends geographic and social boundaries.

In the following sections of this paper, we will delve deeper into the intricacies of our research, embracing the wonder and curiosity that underpin our scientific pursuits. As we embark on this unconventional journey of exploration, let us not forget that in the world of academia, as in life, sometimes the most unexpected relationships can lead to the most captivating discoveries. So fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we navigate the uncharted territory where mental health meets petroleum – a landscape as magnificent and mysterious as the Loch Ness Monster enjoying a cup of tea at a roadside café.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2018. The apparent linkage between mental health care support staff and petrol usage in a different part of the world has perplexed and entertained our team in equal measure. The findings raise numerous eyebrow-raising questions and innovative approaches for future multi-disciplinary investigation. Our research serves as a light-hearted reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we least expect it.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic research, serendipitous discoveries are as elusive as they are exhilarating. It is with this spirit of curiosity and amusement that we present our findings on the unlikely connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan. What began as a lighthearted investigation soon unfolded into an enthralling tale of correlation and causation that takes our imagination on a wild ride through the landscapes of mental health care and fossil fuel consumption.
The premise of this research may seem as improbable as a penguin wearing a tuxedo at a tropical beach, but our team's data-driven exploration has revealed some rather surprising insights. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a chuckle or two, as we consider the uncharted territory where the realms of mental health support and petrol usage collide.
As we plunged into the depths of statistical analysis, armed with spreadsheets and calculators instead of swords and shields, we were met with an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8871716, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptics raise an intrigued eyebrow. The statistical significance of this unearthed link between seemingly disparate phenomena is enough to make even the most stern-faced academics break into a bemused smile.
However, amid the lightheartedness of our revelations, we recognize the potential ramifications of our findings. The unexpected association between psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption beckons us to ponder the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of society. It is a reminder that in the grand tapestry of human existence, the threads of correlation can weave a whimsical narrative that transcends geographic and social boundaries.
In the following sections of this paper, we will delve deeper into the intricacies of our research, embracing the wonder and curiosity that underpin our scientific pursuits. As we embark on this unconventional journey of exploration, let us not forget that in the world of academia, as in life, sometimes the most unexpected relationships can lead to the most captivating discoveries. So fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we navigate the uncharted territory where mental health meets petroleum – a landscape as magnificent and mysterious as the Loch Ness Monster enjoying a cup of tea at a roadside café.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A plethora of scholarly inquiries have delved into the realms of mental health and petroleum consumption, but none have dared to traverse the uncharted psychic highways that connect psychiatric aides in the Land of 10,000 Lakes to the petrol-driven frenzy in the land of sundry spices and vibrant cultures. Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2017) offer comprehensive analysis of mental health care dynamics, while Jones (2018) provides an in-depth exploration of global oil consumption patterns. Yet, it is the amalgamation of these diverse fields that our team seeks to unravel, akin to Sherlock Holmes deciphering the enigmatic connections between unrelated occurrences.

In "Psychiatry and Petroleum: An Unlikely Crude Connection," the authors propose a tantalizing conjecture that the mental well-being of psychiatric aides in Minnesota may hold the key to understanding the per capita petroleum consumption in Pakistan. As we ponder this notion, it becomes akin to recognizing the uncanny resemblance between a cucumber and a pickle – seemingly unrelated, yet profoundly connected by transformative processes that boggle the mind.

Turning to non-fiction literature, the works of Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel" and "Collapse" shake the foundations of conventional wisdom, highlighting the interplay between societal structures and resource utilization that extend far beyond geographical confines. This resonates with our investigation, reminding us that the intricate tapestry of human existence weaves threads of interconnectedness in the most unexpected places, much like finding a misplaced sock inside a briefcase.

On the fictional front, the allegorical parallels found in Orwell's "1984" and Huxley's "Brave New World" proffer a mirror to societal idiosyncrasies, where the juxtaposition of the seemingly incongruous sheds light on the profound truths lurking beneath the surface. Similarly, our research seeks to peel back the layers of incongruity, uncovering the underlying currents that bind psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption together, much like a pair of mismatched socks in a spin cycle.

Taking inspiration from the realm of board games, the unforeseen connectivity between psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption resembles the serendipitous "Chance" card in Monopoly – a playful twist that defies conventional expectations and invites a lively game of unforeseen consequences. Just as the roll of dice can lead to unexpected fortunes or misfortunes, so too can our research illuminate the fortuitous alignment of mental health and energy consumption, painting a whimsical portrait akin to Monopoly money being used in actual financial transactions.

In summary, while the nexus between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan may initially appear as incongruous as a penguin waddling through a desert, our research endeavors to unravel the hidden harmony that underlies this unlikely pair. Through these diverse literary and playful parallels, the tangential yet captivating correlation between mental health care support staff and petrol usage beckons us to embrace the unexpected, making our scholarly pursuits a riveting voyage through the uncharted currents of interdisciplinary whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2018. The apparent linkage between mental health care support staff and petrol usage in a different part of the world has perplexed and entertained our team in equal measure. The findings raise numerous eyebrow-raising questions and innovative approaches for future multi-disciplinary investigation. Our research serves as a light-hearted reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we least expect it.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic research, serendipitous discoveries are as elusive as they are exhilarating. It is with this spirit of curiosity and amusement that we present our findings on the unlikely connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan. What began as a lighthearted investigation soon unfolded into an enthralling tale of correlation and causation that takes our imagination on a wild ride through the landscapes of mental health care and fossil fuel consumption.
The premise of this research may seem as improbable as a penguin wearing a tuxedo at a tropical beach, but our team's data-driven exploration has revealed some rather surprising insights. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a chuckle or two, as we consider the uncharted territory where the realms of mental health support and petrol usage collide.
As we plunged into the depths of statistical analysis, armed with spreadsheets and calculators instead of swords and shields, we were met with an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8871716, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptics raise an intrigued eyebrow. The statistical significance of this unearthed link between seemingly disparate phenomena is enough to make even the most stern-faced academics break into a bemused smile.
However, amid the lightheartedness of our revelations, we recognize the potential ramifications of our findings. The unexpected association between psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption beckons us to ponder the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of society. It is a reminder that in the grand tapestry of human existence, the threads of correlation can weave a whimsical narrative that transcends geographic and social boundaries.
In the following sections of this paper, we will delve deeper into the intricacies of our research, embracing the wonder and curiosity that underpin our scientific pursuits. As we embark on this unconventional journey of exploration, let us not forget that in the world of academia, as in life, sometimes the most unexpected relationships can lead to the most captivating discoveries. So fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we navigate the uncharted territory where mental health meets petroleum – a landscape as magnificent and mysterious as the Loch Ness Monster enjoying a cup of tea at a roadside café.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To illuminate the curious connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan, our research team embarked on a whimsical odyssey through the vast expanse of data mining and statistical tomfoolery. Our approach, akin to a mad scientist concocting a peculiar potion, involved an amalgamation of quantitative analysis, humorous conjecture, and a pinch of good-natured skepticism.

First and foremost, we scoured the digital seas of information, casting our nets far and wide across the internet to capture the elusive data points that would fuel our investigation. The Bureau of Labor Statistics provided us with a bounty of information regarding the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota, while the Energy Information Administration regaled us with tales of petroleum consumption in Pakistan. With these data treasures in hand, we set sail on our research escapade, ready to navigate the choppy waters of correlation and causation.

Our methodology, much like a jester's cap adorned with statistical symbols, involved the meticulous collection of data spanning from 2003 to 2018. Through the artful manipulation of spreadsheets and the enchanting incantations of statistical software, we summoned forth the quantitative measures necessary to discern the relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.

Behold, the wondrous tool of correlation analysis! Employing this marvel of mathematical sorcery, we sought to unveil the hidden dance of numbers that would reveal whether psychiatric support in the Land of 10,000 Lakes could possibly sway the petrol-driven hearts of Pakistan. With a twirl of Pearson's correlation coefficient and a jaunty leap of a two-tailed p-value test, we were poised to uncover the mystical significance of our findings.

In a delightful pas de deux of statistical exploration, we compared the data on psychiatric aides in Minnesota with the petroleum consumption in Pakistan, dancing through the years with the grace of a mathematical ballet. Like a pair of partners in a whimsical waltz, the variables revealed their intricate steps, leading us to an unexpected revelation – a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01.

But the mirthful mystery did not end there! To ensure the robustness of our findings, we engaged in a series of sensitivity analyses, akin to a comedic magic act where statistical rabbits were pulled out of the hat of data manipulation. Through these rigorous tests, we confirmed the stability of our correlation, leaving us in a state of both marvel and amusement at the unanticipated bond between psychiatric support and petroleum predilections.

So there you have it, dear reader – our outlandish journey through the methodology of our research. Through the combination of data wrangling, statistical frolicking, and a hint of scholarly jest, we endeavored to shed light on the delightful enigma of mental petroleum. Let this improbable tale of research methodology serve as a testament to the uncharted territory where the worlds of data and drollery intersect, inviting us to embrace the merry dance of scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8871716, r-squared of 0.7870735, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2018. The apparent linkage between mental health care support staff and petrol usage in a different part of the world has perplexed and entertained our team in equal measure. The findings raise numerous eyebrow-raising questions and innovative approaches for future multi-disciplinary investigation. Our research serves as a light-hearted reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we least expect it.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of academic research, serendipitous discoveries are as elusive as they are exhilarating. It is with this spirit of curiosity and amusement that we present our findings on the unlikely connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan. What began as a lighthearted investigation soon unfolded into an enthralling tale of correlation and causation that takes our imagination on a wild ride through the landscapes of mental health care and fossil fuel consumption.
The premise of this research may seem as improbable as a penguin wearing a tuxedo at a tropical beach, but our team's data-driven exploration has revealed some rather surprising insights. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a chuckle or two, as we consider the uncharted territory where the realms of mental health support and petrol usage collide.
As we plunged into the depths of statistical analysis, armed with spreadsheets and calculators instead of swords and shields, we were met with an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8871716, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptics raise an intrigued eyebrow. The statistical significance of this unearthed link between seemingly disparate phenomena is enough to make even the most stern-faced academics break into a bemused smile.
However, amid the lightheartedness of our revelations, we recognize the potential ramifications of our findings. The unexpected association between psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption beckons us to ponder the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of society. It is a reminder that in the grand tapestry of human existence, the threads of correlation can weave a whimsical narrative that transcends geographic and social boundaries.
In the following sections of this paper, we will delve deeper into the intricacies of our research, embracing the wonder and curiosity that underpin our scientific pursuits. As we embark on this unconventional journey of exploration, let us not forget that in the world of academia, as in life, sometimes the most unexpected relationships can lead to the most captivating discoveries. So fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we navigate the uncharted territory where mental health meets petroleum – a landscape as magnificent and mysterious as the Loch Ness Monster enjoying a cup of tea at a roadside café.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study cast light on the remarkably robust correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Drumroll, please! The correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 that emerged from our analysis left our team in a state of gleeful disbelief, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a field of statistics.

The strength of this correlation, as evidenced by the r-squared value of 0.7870735, prompted a collective double-take from our researchers. It was as though we had unearthed a hidden treasure map in the seemingly mundane data landscape, revealing an unexpected path that leads from the compassionate care of mental health aides to the roaring engines of fossil fuel consumption.

In a display of this astonishing connection, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the striking relationship between the two variables. It's a chart that could make even the stodgiest of academic eyebrows arch with a mixture of skepticism and intrigue.

The p-value of less than 0.01 for the correlation coefficient further solidifies the statistical significance of our findings. It's as though the data itself donned a pair of oversized novelty glasses and shouted, "Surprise!" to the scientific community.

Our research team couldn't help but revel in the unexpected nature of these results. The idea that the number of psychiatric aides in the Land of 10,000 Lakes could hold any sway over the petroleum consumption in a land far, far away seemed like a punchline in an April Fools' joke. Yet, here we are, presenting these findings with the utmost sincerity and a dash of whimsy, knowing that our discovery challenges conventional wisdom in the most delightful way.

In conclusion, our results not only underscore the surprising interplay between mental health support and energy consumption but also beckon us to embrace the whimsicality of scientific inquiry. It serves as a gentle nudge to the academic community, reminding us that even in the most unexpected pairings, there may lie profound insights and captivating tales waiting to be told. So, let us raise a toast to the utterly unexpected but undeniably real link between "Mental Petroleum."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2018. The apparent linkage between mental health care support staff and petrol usage in a different part of the world has perplexed and entertained our team in equal measure. The findings raise numerous eyebrow-raising questions and innovative approaches for future multi-disciplinary investigation. Our research serves as a light-hearted reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we least expect it.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A plethora of scholarly inquiries have delved into the realms of mental health and petroleum consumption, but none have dared to traverse the uncharted psychic highways that connect psychiatric aides in the Land of 10,000 Lakes to the petrol-driven frenzy in the land of sundry spices and vibrant cultures. Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2017) offer comprehensive analysis of mental health care dynamics, while Jones (2018) provides an in-depth exploration of global oil consumption patterns. Yet, it is the amalgamation of these diverse fields that our team seeks to unravel, akin to Sherlock Holmes deciphering the enigmatic connections between unrelated occurrences.
In "Psychiatry and Petroleum: An Unlikely Crude Connection," the authors propose a tantalizing conjecture that the mental well-being of psychiatric aides in Minnesota may hold the key to understanding the per capita petroleum consumption in Pakistan. As we ponder this notion, it becomes akin to recognizing the uncanny resemblance between a cucumber and a pickle – seemingly unrelated, yet profoundly connected by transformative processes that boggle the mind.
Turning to non-fiction literature, the works of Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel" and "Collapse" shake the foundations of conventional wisdom, highlighting the interplay between societal structures and resource utilization that extend far beyond geographical confines. This resonates with our investigation, reminding us that the intricate tapestry of human existence weaves threads of interconnectedness in the most unexpected places, much like finding a misplaced sock inside a briefcase.
On the fictional front, the allegorical parallels found in Orwell's "1984" and Huxley's "Brave New World" proffer a mirror to societal idiosyncrasies, where the juxtaposition of the seemingly incongruous sheds light on the profound truths lurking beneath the surface. Similarly, our research seeks to peel back the layers of incongruity, uncovering the underlying currents that bind psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption together, much like a pair of mismatched socks in a spin cycle.
Taking inspiration from the realm of board games, the unforeseen connectivity between psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption resembles the serendipitous "Chance" card in Monopoly – a playful twist that defies conventional expectations and invites a lively game of unforeseen consequences. Just as the roll of dice can lead to unexpected fortunes or misfortunes, so too can our research illuminate the fortuitous alignment of mental health and energy consumption, painting a whimsical portrait akin to Monopoly money being used in actual financial transactions.
In summary, while the nexus between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan may initially appear as incongruous as a penguin waddling through a desert, our research endeavors to unravel the hidden harmony that underlies this unlikely pair. Through these diverse literary and playful parallels, the tangential yet captivating correlation between mental health care support staff and petrol usage beckons us to embrace the unexpected, making our scholarly pursuits a riveting voyage through the uncharted currents of interdisciplinary whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study cast light on the remarkably robust correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Drumroll, please! The correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 that emerged from our analysis left our team in a state of gleeful disbelief, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a field of statistics.
The strength of this correlation, as evidenced by the r-squared value of 0.7870735, prompted a collective double-take from our researchers. It was as though we had unearthed a hidden treasure map in the seemingly mundane data landscape, revealing an unexpected path that leads from the compassionate care of mental health aides to the roaring engines of fossil fuel consumption.
In a display of this astonishing connection, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the striking relationship between the two variables. It's a chart that could make even the stodgiest of academic eyebrows arch with a mixture of skepticism and intrigue.
The p-value of less than 0.01 for the correlation coefficient further solidifies the statistical significance of our findings. It's as though the data itself donned a pair of oversized novelty glasses and shouted, "Surprise!" to the scientific community.
Our research team couldn't help but revel in the unexpected nature of these results. The idea that the number of psychiatric aides in the Land of 10,000 Lakes could hold any sway over the petroleum consumption in a land far, far away seemed like a punchline in an April Fools' joke. Yet, here we are, presenting these findings with the utmost sincerity and a dash of whimsy, knowing that our discovery challenges conventional wisdom in the most delightful way.
In conclusion, our results not only underscore the surprising interplay between mental health support and energy consumption but also beckon us to embrace the whimsicality of scientific inquiry. It serves as a gentle nudge to the academic community, reminding us that even in the most unexpected pairings, there may lie profound insights and captivating tales waiting to be told. So, let us raise a toast to the utterly unexpected but undeniably real link between "Mental Petroleum."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has illuminated a remarkable correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan, adding a touch of whimsy to the field of research. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8871716, akin to finding a unicorn in a field of statistics, echoes the delightfully surprising tone set by earlier literary and playful parallels drawn in the literature review. In effect, our findings offer a playful, yet profound resonance with the juxtaposition of incongruous elements, much like a cucumber metamorphosing into a pickle or a pair of mismatched socks in a spin cycle.

The alignment of our results with prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2017) underscores the potential influence of mental health dynamics on global energy consumption patterns, akin to Sherlock Holmes unraveling enigmatic connections between seemingly unrelated occurrences. It's as though our data donned a pair of oversized novelty glasses and shouted "Surprise!" to the scientific community, reinforcing the unexpected harmony between psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption.

The fortuitous combination of mental health support and energy consumption resembles the serendipitous "Chance" card in Monopoly, defying conventional expectations and inviting a lively game of unforeseen consequences. Our results add a playful twist to the serious discourse on mental health and energy dynamics, much like Monopoly money being used in actual financial transactions. These unexpected findings serve as a gentle nudge to the academic community, reminding us to embrace the whimsicality of scientific inquiry and inspiring a riveting voyage through the uncharted currents of interdisciplinary whimsy.

In summary, our results not only highlight the surprising interplay between mental health support and energy consumption but also beckon us to embrace the whimsicality of scientific inquiry. The unexpected yet undeniably real link between "Mental Petroleum" offers a reminder that even in the most unexpected pairings, there may lie profound insights and captivating tales waiting to be told. As we continue to unravel the hidden harmony between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan, let us raise a toast to the unexpected, for it may yield delightful discoveries that challenge conventional wisdom and enrich the tapestry of human knowledge. Cheers to mental petroleum!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Petroluem consumption in Pakistan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2018. The apparent linkage between mental health care support staff and petrol usage in a different part of the world has perplexed and entertained our team in equal measure. The findings raise numerous eyebrow-raising questions and innovative approaches for future multi-disciplinary investigation. Our research serves as a light-hearted reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we least expect it.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of academic research, serendipitous discoveries are as elusive as they are exhilarating. It is with this spirit of curiosity and amusement that we present our findings on the unlikely connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan. What began as a lighthearted investigation soon unfolded into an enthralling tale of correlation and causation that takes our imagination on a wild ride through the landscapes of mental health care and fossil fuel consumption.
The premise of this research may seem as improbable as a penguin wearing a tuxedo at a tropical beach, but our team's data-driven exploration has revealed some rather surprising insights. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also prompt a chuckle or two, as we consider the uncharted territory where the realms of mental health support and petrol usage collide.
As we plunged into the depths of statistical analysis, armed with spreadsheets and calculators instead of swords and shields, we were met with an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8871716, accompanied by a p-value that would make even the staunchest skeptics raise an intrigued eyebrow. The statistical significance of this unearthed link between seemingly disparate phenomena is enough to make even the most stern-faced academics break into a bemused smile.
However, amid the lightheartedness of our revelations, we recognize the potential ramifications of our findings. The unexpected association between psychiatric aides and petroleum consumption beckons us to ponder the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of society. It is a reminder that in the grand tapestry of human existence, the threads of correlation can weave a whimsical narrative that transcends geographic and social boundaries.
In the following sections of this paper, we will delve deeper into the intricacies of our research, embracing the wonder and curiosity that underpin our scientific pursuits. As we embark on this unconventional journey of exploration, let us not forget that in the world of academia, as in life, sometimes the most unexpected relationships can lead to the most captivating discoveries. So fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, as we navigate the uncharted territory where mental health meets petroleum – a landscape as magnificent and mysterious as the Loch Ness Monster enjoying a cup of tea at a roadside café.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study cast light on the remarkably robust correlation between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Drumroll, please! The correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 that emerged from our analysis left our team in a state of gleeful disbelief, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a field of statistics.
The strength of this correlation, as evidenced by the r-squared value of 0.7870735, prompted a collective double-take from our researchers. It was as though we had unearthed a hidden treasure map in the seemingly mundane data landscape, revealing an unexpected path that leads from the compassionate care of mental health aides to the roaring engines of fossil fuel consumption.
In a display of this astonishing connection, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the striking relationship between the two variables. It's a chart that could make even the stodgiest of academic eyebrows arch with a mixture of skepticism and intrigue.
The p-value of less than 0.01 for the correlation coefficient further solidifies the statistical significance of our findings. It's as though the data itself donned a pair of oversized novelty glasses and shouted, "Surprise!" to the scientific community.
Our research team couldn't help but revel in the unexpected nature of these results. The idea that the number of psychiatric aides in the Land of 10,000 Lakes could hold any sway over the petroleum consumption in a land far, far away seemed like a punchline in an April Fools' joke. Yet, here we are, presenting these findings with the utmost sincerity and a dash of whimsy, knowing that our discovery challenges conventional wisdom in the most delightful way.
In conclusion, our results not only underscore the surprising interplay between mental health support and energy consumption but also beckon us to embrace the whimsicality of scientific inquiry. It serves as a gentle nudge to the academic community, reminding us that even in the most unexpected pairings, there may lie profound insights and captivating tales waiting to be told. So, let us raise a toast to the utterly unexpected but undeniably real link between "Mental Petroleum."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a captivating correlation between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and petroleum consumption in Pakistan. It’s as though we stumbled upon a cosmic joke whispered by the universe—perhaps a Freudian slip of interconnectedness, if you will. The sheer robustness of the correlation coefficient and the statistical significance of our findings have left us spellbound, like discovering a pot of gold at the end of a whimsical rainbow.

The implications of our findings certainly add a dimension of peculiarity to the fields of mental health care and energy consumption. It’s like finding a sandwich in a briefcase—it simply doesn't belong, but here it is, challenging our understanding of cause and effect in the most delightful manner.

Where does this leave us? Well, it’s safe to say that the connection between psychiatric support staff and petrol usage has more layers than an onion at a comedy show. It beckons us to embrace the delightful oddities of scientific inquiry and reminds us that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to astonishing revelations.

As we raise our metaphorical magnifying glasses to these unlikely bedfellows, it is with a bittersweet sense of finality that we assert: no more research is needed in this area. We have plumbed the depths of this eccentric correlation, and any further investigation would be like trying to tickle oneself—amusing in theory, but ultimately fruitless.

In the grand tapestry of academic exploration, let our findings stand as a testament to the whimsy and wonder that await those who dare to connect the unconnectable. Cheers to mental petroleum, a conundrum that has tickled our academic fancies and challenged our conventional wisdom in the most delightful way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Unconventional Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cross-Cultural Psychiatric Anthropology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mental Petroleum: An Unlikely Connection Between Psychiatric Aides in Minnesota and Petroleum Consumption in Pakistan with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the petroleum consumption in Pakistan. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8871716 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2018. The apparent linkage between mental health care support staff and petrol usage in a different part of the world has perplexed and entertained our team in equal measure. The findings raise numerous eyebrow-raising questions and innovative approaches for future multi-disciplinary investigation. Our research serves as a light-hearted reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can be discovered when we least expect it.

ChatGPT:

psychiatric aides, Minnesota, petroleum consumption, Pakistan, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, mental health care, petrol usage, multi-disciplinary investigation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of psychiatric aides in Minnesota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota

Petroluem consumption in Pakistan
Detailed data title: Volume of petroluem consumption consumed in Pakistan in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Petroluem consumption in Pakistan

Correlation r = 0.8871716 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7870735 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Petroluem consumption in Pakistan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota) over the 16 years from 2003 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.61E-6. 0.0000046093280688146100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.000461% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 216,951 random variables You don't actually need 216 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota (Psychiatric Aides)150150210140430380390190180190510480900840900430
Petroluem consumption in Pakistan (Million Barrels/Day)301.743330.453340.275379.089400.539395.559398.334411.241413.317420.31461.654497.813526597.008594.039491.394




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([150,150,210,140,430,380,390,190,180,190,510,480,900,840,900,430,])
array_2 = np.array([301.743,330.453,340.275,379.089,400.539,395.559,398.334,411.241,413.317,420.31,461.654,497.813,526,597.008,594.039,491.394,])
array_1_name = "The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota"
array_2_name = "Petroluem consumption in Pakistan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2349 · Black Variable ID: 9982 · Red Variable ID: 24787
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0