about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,341 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.  The chart goes from 1982 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The poor air quality in Grants Pass was actually the result of a secret Mercedes-Benz perfume-spraying drone fleet, which inadvertently led to a spike in automotive malfunctions. It turns out, their luxurious air freshener program was just a little too overzealous, causing a stink among the local vehicles and prompting the unexpected recalls. Looks like even the fanciest of cars couldn't air out this peculiar problem!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting the city of Grants Pass, Oregon. A thick layer of smog envelopes the streets, blurring the bright blue sky. In the foreground, a row of Mercedes-Benz cars sits parked along the road, their sleek exteriors tinged with grime from the polluted air. Emissions from the vehicles mingle with the smog, creating a hazy and suffocating atmosphere. This visually poignant scene serves as a reminder of the urgent need to address air pollution and reduce harmful emissions for the well-being of both people and the environment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau a funny image macro A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie a funny image macro
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, in the following situation: The smog situation was benz-ing the wrong signals. It seems like the emissions were driving a wedge between the cars and fresh air. Clearly, there was a real gas crisis happening. It's like the pollution was throwing shade at the Mercedes, leading to a real exhaust-ing ordeal. Overall, it's a reminder that we all need to work together to clean up our act, for the sake of our health and the environment.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the city of Grants Pass, Oregon, a thick layer of smog hangs over the streets, obscuring the bright blue sky. A line of Mercedes-Benz cars is parked along the road, their sleek exteriors tinged with a layer of grime from the polluted air. The emissions from the vehicles mingle with the smog, creating a hazy and suffocating atmosphere. The image serves as a poignant reminder of the urgent need to address air pollution and reduce harmful emissions for the well-being of both people and the environment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In the city of Grants Pass, Oregon, a thick layer of smog hangs over the streets, obscuring the bright blue sky. A line of Mercedes-Benz cars is parked along the road, their sleek exteriors tinged with a layer of grime from the polluted air. The emissions from the vehicles mingle with the smog, creating a hazy and suffocating atmosphere. The image serves as a poignant reminder of the urgent need to address air pollution and reduce harmful emissions for the well-being of both people and the environment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting the city of Grants Pass, Oregon. A thick layer of smog envelopes the streets, blurring the bright blue sky. In the foreground, a row of Mercedes-Benz cars sits parked along the road, their sleek exteriors tinged with grime from the polluted air. Emissions from the vehicles mingle with the smog, creating a hazy and suffocating atmosphere. This visually poignant scene serves as a reminder of the urgent need to address air pollution and reduce harmful emissions for the well-being of both people and the environment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon caused Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls

Journal of Automotive Emissions Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and p < 0.01 for 1982 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this whimsically titled paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena appears as surprising as a flat tire on a perfectly sunny day, our research team emerged with findings that would make even the most stoic of academics crack a smile.

Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1982 to 2022, our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01. As we sifted through the data, it became apparent that there was a high degree of association between increased air pollution levels in Grants Pass and a subsequent uptick in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that the emissions weren't the only things catching attention in the air!

The presence of such a robust correlation prompts the inevitable question: are these recalls mere coincidence, or are they reflective of a broader environmental impact? Our findings open the door to a plethora of implications and lend credence to the notion that automotive recalls may have deeper roots than initially suspected. After all, in the world of data analysis, sometimes "diesel" is in the details. As we continue to unravel the threads of this intriguing link, our hope is that this research sparks not only scholarly curiosity but also the occasional chuckle – because even in the world of academia, a good dad joke can drive home a point just as effectively as a statistically significant finding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this whimsically titled paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena appears as surprising as a flat tire on a perfectly sunny day, our research team emerged with findings that would make even the most stoic of academics crack a smile.

Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1982 to 2022, our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01. As we sifted through the data, it became apparent that there was a high degree of association between increased air pollution levels in Grants Pass and a subsequent uptick in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that the emissions weren't the only things catching attention in the air!

The presence of such a robust correlation prompts the inevitable question: are these recalls mere coincidence, or are they reflective of a broader environmental impact? Our findings open the door to a plethora of implications and lend credence to the notion that automotive recalls may have deeper roots than initially suspected. After all, in the world of data analysis, sometimes "diesel" is in the details. As we continue to unravel the threads of this intriguing link, our hope is that this research sparks not only scholarly curiosity but also the occasional chuckle – because even in the world of academia, a good dad joke can drive home a point just as effectively as a statistically significant finding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in the case of our study, where there's air pollution, there's an intriguing connection to automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research takes a whimsical dive into the surprising relationship between emissions in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of recalls, revealing a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a spare tire in the trunk.

We know what you're thinking: "What do air pollution and automotive recalls have in common? Are we about to embark on a journey through the punny side of science?" Well, buckle up and put on your thinking caps, because we're about to embark on a ride that's as bumpy and unpredictable as a car with a faulty suspension – but fear not, we'll tread lightly on the dad jokes... just "tire"d of them if you ask me!

Our data analysis, drawing from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation archives from 1982 to 2022, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a strong association between air pollution levels in Grants Pass and the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls. It's as if the emissions were blowing the whistle on the automotive industry, revealing a link that's as clear as the smog on a hazy morning.

The statistical significance of this relationship prompts us to ask the unavoidable question: are these recalls an isolated incident, or are they symptomatic of a larger environmental quandary? It seems that in the world of data analysis, even the most unexpected findings can rev our engines of curiosity! After all, in the intricate web of correlation and causation, it's important to remember that sometimes the "diesel" might just be in the details.

As we navigate through this revelatory landscape, our hope is that our research not only intrigues the scientific community but also elicits the occasional chuckle – because in the world of academia, it's not just about the hard numbers; a well-timed pun can be the fuel that drives a point home. So fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a ride that's as illuminating as it is amusing – who knew statistical analysis could be this uplifting?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this whimsically titled paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena appears as surprising as a flat tire on a perfectly sunny day, our research team emerged with findings that would make even the most stoic of academics crack a smile.

Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1982 to 2022, our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01. As we sifted through the data, it became apparent that there was a high degree of association between increased air pollution levels in Grants Pass and a subsequent uptick in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that the emissions weren't the only things catching attention in the air!

The presence of such a robust correlation prompts the inevitable question: are these recalls mere coincidence, or are they reflective of a broader environmental impact? Our findings open the door to a plethora of implications and lend credence to the notion that automotive recalls may have deeper roots than initially suspected. After all, in the world of data analysis, sometimes "diesel" is in the details. As we continue to unravel the threads of this intriguing link, our hope is that this research sparks not only scholarly curiosity but also the occasional chuckle – because even in the world of academia, a good dad joke can drive home a point just as effectively as a statistically significant finding.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in the case of our study, where there's air pollution, there's an intriguing connection to automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research takes a whimsical dive into the surprising relationship between emissions in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of recalls, revealing a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a spare tire in the trunk.
We know what you're thinking: "What do air pollution and automotive recalls have in common? Are we about to embark on a journey through the punny side of science?" Well, buckle up and put on your thinking caps, because we're about to embark on a ride that's as bumpy and unpredictable as a car with a faulty suspension – but fear not, we'll tread lightly on the dad jokes... just "tire"d of them if you ask me!
Our data analysis, drawing from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation archives from 1982 to 2022, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a strong association between air pollution levels in Grants Pass and the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls. It's as if the emissions were blowing the whistle on the automotive industry, revealing a link that's as clear as the smog on a hazy morning.
The statistical significance of this relationship prompts us to ask the unavoidable question: are these recalls an isolated incident, or are they symptomatic of a larger environmental quandary? It seems that in the world of data analysis, even the most unexpected findings can rev our engines of curiosity! After all, in the intricate web of correlation and causation, it's important to remember that sometimes the "diesel" might just be in the details.
As we navigate through this revelatory landscape, our hope is that our research not only intrigues the scientific community but also elicits the occasional chuckle – because in the world of academia, it's not just about the hard numbers; a well-timed pun can be the fuel that drives a point home. So fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a ride that's as illuminating as it is amusing – who knew statistical analysis could be this uplifting?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Impact of Air Pollution on Vehicle Performance" by Smith, the authors find a significant association between air pollution levels and automotive malfunctions, shedding light on the potential implications for vehicle manufacturers. In a similar vein, Doe and Jones, in "Emissions and Automotive Safety," delve into the complex interplay between emissions and automotive recalls, hinting at a deeper connection between environmental factors and vehicular reliability.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Diesel Dilemma" by John Automotive presents a comprehensive analysis of the challenges faced by the automotive industry in the wake of emissions scandals, offering insights into the potential ramifications for vehicle safety standards. Similarly, "Pollution and Performance: A Case Study of Grants Pass, Oregon" by Emily Environmentalist examines the unique environmental landscape of Grants Pass and its potential impact on automotive technologies, providing a nuanced perspective on the intersections of air quality and vehicular functionality.

Shifting gears to fiction, "The Smoky Road Ahead" by Car L. Fumes artfully weaves a tale of intrigue and automotive mishaps, hinting at a parallel universe where air pollution levels hold the key to unraveling the mysteries of car troubles. In a whimsical twist, "Recalls and Romance" by Engine Enthusiast introduces a protagonist whose love for vintage cars is entwined with the enigmatic allure of air pollution, blurring the lines between automotive woes and matters of the heart.

In an unexpected deviation from conventional scholarly sources, the researchers also gleaned information from an array of unorthodox texts, including the backs of shampoo bottles, the monologues of stand-up comedians, and the musings of loquacious parrots. While these unconventional sources yielded questionable scholarly value, they did contribute a fair share of amusement and a plethora of tangential references to the refreshing scent of "clean air" – a stark contrast to the implications of air pollution on automotive recalls. These findings underscore the unpredictable nature of scholarly inquiry and the occasional necessity of veering into uncharted, albeit laugh-inducing, territories.

As the literature review traverses through serious and amusing works alike, it becomes evident that the relationship between air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon, and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA is a compelling subject that transcends traditional boundaries of academic inquiry. From scholarly to whimsical, the literature surrounding this topic highlights the multidimensional nature of the research, proving that even in the realm of academia, a well-placed dad joke can be as impactful as a well-cited source. So, in the spirit of scholarly exploration and the occasional comedic relief, let's rev our engines and drive into the heart of this peculiar correlation – because as they say, sometimes the journey is as enlightening as the destination. And if nothing else, it's an opportunity to squeeze in a few more puns about cars and air quality, right? After all, where there's smog, there's bound to be a wealth of dad jokes just waiting to be unleashed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT . You used data from 1982 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this whimsically titled paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena appears as surprising as a flat tire on a perfectly sunny day, our research team emerged with findings that would make even the most stoic of academics crack a smile.

Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1982 to 2022, our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01. As we sifted through the data, it became apparent that there was a high degree of association between increased air pollution levels in Grants Pass and a subsequent uptick in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that the emissions weren't the only things catching attention in the air!

The presence of such a robust correlation prompts the inevitable question: are these recalls mere coincidence, or are they reflective of a broader environmental impact? Our findings open the door to a plethora of implications and lend credence to the notion that automotive recalls may have deeper roots than initially suspected. After all, in the world of data analysis, sometimes "diesel" is in the details. As we continue to unravel the threads of this intriguing link, our hope is that this research sparks not only scholarly curiosity but also the occasional chuckle – because even in the world of academia, a good dad joke can drive home a point just as effectively as a statistically significant finding.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in the case of our study, where there's air pollution, there's an intriguing connection to automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research takes a whimsical dive into the surprising relationship between emissions in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of recalls, revealing a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a spare tire in the trunk.
We know what you're thinking: "What do air pollution and automotive recalls have in common? Are we about to embark on a journey through the punny side of science?" Well, buckle up and put on your thinking caps, because we're about to embark on a ride that's as bumpy and unpredictable as a car with a faulty suspension – but fear not, we'll tread lightly on the dad jokes... just "tire"d of them if you ask me!
Our data analysis, drawing from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation archives from 1982 to 2022, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a strong association between air pollution levels in Grants Pass and the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls. It's as if the emissions were blowing the whistle on the automotive industry, revealing a link that's as clear as the smog on a hazy morning.
The statistical significance of this relationship prompts us to ask the unavoidable question: are these recalls an isolated incident, or are they symptomatic of a larger environmental quandary? It seems that in the world of data analysis, even the most unexpected findings can rev our engines of curiosity! After all, in the intricate web of correlation and causation, it's important to remember that sometimes the "diesel" might just be in the details.
As we navigate through this revelatory landscape, our hope is that our research not only intrigues the scientific community but also elicits the occasional chuckle – because in the world of academia, it's not just about the hard numbers; a well-timed pun can be the fuel that drives a point home. So fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a ride that's as illuminating as it is amusing – who knew statistical analysis could be this uplifting?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA, our research team embarked on an odyssey through vast data oceans, navigating through the choppy waves of statistics and the occasional riptide of dad jokes. Our data gathering efforts predominantly relied on sources such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation, serving as a compass to guide our scientific ship through the tempestuous seas of data analysis.

In our quest for statistical enlightenment, we meticulously combed through data spanning the years 1982 to 2022, akin to intrepid sailors searching for treasure in uncharted waters. We analyzed air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, monitoring the ebb and flow of those elusive emissions as they danced their atmospheric ballet. As for the automotive world, we delved into the intriguing world of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls, observing the patterns that emerged with the keen eye of a seafaring navigator, searching for constellations in the sky but finding correlations in the data instead.

Employing a blend of rigorous statistical methods and the occasional good-natured pun, our analysis aimed to uncover the underlying relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. We meticulously calculated correlation coefficients, navigated the treacherous p-values, and steered clear of any statistical iceberg that threatened to sink our scholarly ship. Additionally, we employed time series analysis techniques to discern the temporal patterns between air pollution levels and the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls, illuminating the path forward with the metaphorical lighthouse of scientific inquiry. Our methodologies were as precise as a perfectly-tuned car engine, ensuring that our findings would withstand the rigorous scrutiny of the academic highway.

Throughout the journey, we meticulous kept detailed records of our scientific escapade, ensuring that every leap of faith into statistical abyss was charted with the accuracy of a seasoned cartographer. Our methodologies were as solid as the suspension of a luxury car, holding up under the weight of academic inquiry and the occasional dad joke. After all, in the world of research, every methodological twist and turn should be as engaging as a winding road through the countryside – methodological meandering with a purpose, you might say.

With our navigation charted and our statistical compass calibrated, we dove headfirst into the data, eager to uncover the hidden treasures of correlation and causation that lay beyond. It’s said that discovering a good methodology is like finding a needle in a haystack, but for us, it was more like finding a correlation in statistical haystack – equally rewarding, yet far less painful if you accidentally sit on it by mistake!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT .

For the time period 1982 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7459466, r-squared of 0.5564363, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this whimsically titled paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena appears as surprising as a flat tire on a perfectly sunny day, our research team emerged with findings that would make even the most stoic of academics crack a smile.

Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1982 to 2022, our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01. As we sifted through the data, it became apparent that there was a high degree of association between increased air pollution levels in Grants Pass and a subsequent uptick in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that the emissions weren't the only things catching attention in the air!

The presence of such a robust correlation prompts the inevitable question: are these recalls mere coincidence, or are they reflective of a broader environmental impact? Our findings open the door to a plethora of implications and lend credence to the notion that automotive recalls may have deeper roots than initially suspected. After all, in the world of data analysis, sometimes "diesel" is in the details. As we continue to unravel the threads of this intriguing link, our hope is that this research sparks not only scholarly curiosity but also the occasional chuckle – because even in the world of academia, a good dad joke can drive home a point just as effectively as a statistically significant finding.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in the case of our study, where there's air pollution, there's an intriguing connection to automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research takes a whimsical dive into the surprising relationship between emissions in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of recalls, revealing a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a spare tire in the trunk.
We know what you're thinking: "What do air pollution and automotive recalls have in common? Are we about to embark on a journey through the punny side of science?" Well, buckle up and put on your thinking caps, because we're about to embark on a ride that's as bumpy and unpredictable as a car with a faulty suspension – but fear not, we'll tread lightly on the dad jokes... just "tire"d of them if you ask me!
Our data analysis, drawing from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation archives from 1982 to 2022, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a strong association between air pollution levels in Grants Pass and the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls. It's as if the emissions were blowing the whistle on the automotive industry, revealing a link that's as clear as the smog on a hazy morning.
The statistical significance of this relationship prompts us to ask the unavoidable question: are these recalls an isolated incident, or are they symptomatic of a larger environmental quandary? It seems that in the world of data analysis, even the most unexpected findings can rev our engines of curiosity! After all, in the intricate web of correlation and causation, it's important to remember that sometimes the "diesel" might just be in the details.
As we navigate through this revelatory landscape, our hope is that our research not only intrigues the scientific community but also elicits the occasional chuckle – because in the world of academia, it's not just about the hard numbers; a well-timed pun can be the fuel that drives a point home. So fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a ride that's as illuminating as it is amusing – who knew statistical analysis could be this uplifting?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our statistical analysis, we found a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA during the years 1982 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It appears that when it comes to air pollution and automotive recalls, they're not just blowing smoke; there's a real connection – and no, we're not just "exhaust"ingly trying to impress you with wordplay!

The r-squared value of 0.5564363 further reinforces this significant association, underscoring the degree to which changes in air pollution levels coincide with fluctuations in the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls. It's as if the emissions were leaving a trail for us to follow, pointing us in the direction of this unexpected link as unmistakably as a GPS navigation system – though in this case, the route may be more circuitous than a winding road through the mountains.

Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the notion that the relationship between air pollution in Grants Pass and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA is not a random occurrence. It seems that the emissions weren't just hot air after all; they were signaling something meaningful – much like the flashing lights of a dashboard warning indicator.

To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly portrays the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Grants Pass and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It's a graph that speaks volumes – almost as much as a car horn in rush hour traffic!

Overall, our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between air pollution and automotive recalls but also bear implications that endure far beyond the realm of statistics and data analysis. It appears that in the world of research, uncovering unexpected relationships can be as exhilarating as a spontaneous detour on a road trip. After all, in the grand scheme of scientific inquiry, sometimes the most singular discoveries are hidden in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this whimsically titled paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena appears as surprising as a flat tire on a perfectly sunny day, our research team emerged with findings that would make even the most stoic of academics crack a smile.

Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1982 to 2022, our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01. As we sifted through the data, it became apparent that there was a high degree of association between increased air pollution levels in Grants Pass and a subsequent uptick in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that the emissions weren't the only things catching attention in the air!

The presence of such a robust correlation prompts the inevitable question: are these recalls mere coincidence, or are they reflective of a broader environmental impact? Our findings open the door to a plethora of implications and lend credence to the notion that automotive recalls may have deeper roots than initially suspected. After all, in the world of data analysis, sometimes "diesel" is in the details. As we continue to unravel the threads of this intriguing link, our hope is that this research sparks not only scholarly curiosity but also the occasional chuckle – because even in the world of academia, a good dad joke can drive home a point just as effectively as a statistically significant finding.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Impact of Air Pollution on Vehicle Performance" by Smith, the authors find a significant association between air pollution levels and automotive malfunctions, shedding light on the potential implications for vehicle manufacturers. In a similar vein, Doe and Jones, in "Emissions and Automotive Safety," delve into the complex interplay between emissions and automotive recalls, hinting at a deeper connection between environmental factors and vehicular reliability.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Diesel Dilemma" by John Automotive presents a comprehensive analysis of the challenges faced by the automotive industry in the wake of emissions scandals, offering insights into the potential ramifications for vehicle safety standards. Similarly, "Pollution and Performance: A Case Study of Grants Pass, Oregon" by Emily Environmentalist examines the unique environmental landscape of Grants Pass and its potential impact on automotive technologies, providing a nuanced perspective on the intersections of air quality and vehicular functionality.
Shifting gears to fiction, "The Smoky Road Ahead" by Car L. Fumes artfully weaves a tale of intrigue and automotive mishaps, hinting at a parallel universe where air pollution levels hold the key to unraveling the mysteries of car troubles. In a whimsical twist, "Recalls and Romance" by Engine Enthusiast introduces a protagonist whose love for vintage cars is entwined with the enigmatic allure of air pollution, blurring the lines between automotive woes and matters of the heart.
In an unexpected deviation from conventional scholarly sources, the researchers also gleaned information from an array of unorthodox texts, including the backs of shampoo bottles, the monologues of stand-up comedians, and the musings of loquacious parrots. While these unconventional sources yielded questionable scholarly value, they did contribute a fair share of amusement and a plethora of tangential references to the refreshing scent of "clean air" – a stark contrast to the implications of air pollution on automotive recalls. These findings underscore the unpredictable nature of scholarly inquiry and the occasional necessity of veering into uncharted, albeit laugh-inducing, territories.
As the literature review traverses through serious and amusing works alike, it becomes evident that the relationship between air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon, and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA is a compelling subject that transcends traditional boundaries of academic inquiry. From scholarly to whimsical, the literature surrounding this topic highlights the multidimensional nature of the research, proving that even in the realm of academia, a well-placed dad joke can be as impactful as a well-cited source. So, in the spirit of scholarly exploration and the occasional comedic relief, let's rev our engines and drive into the heart of this peculiar correlation – because as they say, sometimes the journey is as enlightening as the destination. And if nothing else, it's an opportunity to squeeze in a few more puns about cars and air quality, right? After all, where there's smog, there's bound to be a wealth of dad jokes just waiting to be unleashed!

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our statistical analysis, we found a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA during the years 1982 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It appears that when it comes to air pollution and automotive recalls, they're not just blowing smoke; there's a real connection – and no, we're not just "exhaust"ingly trying to impress you with wordplay!
The r-squared value of 0.5564363 further reinforces this significant association, underscoring the degree to which changes in air pollution levels coincide with fluctuations in the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls. It's as if the emissions were leaving a trail for us to follow, pointing us in the direction of this unexpected link as unmistakably as a GPS navigation system – though in this case, the route may be more circuitous than a winding road through the mountains.
Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the notion that the relationship between air pollution in Grants Pass and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA is not a random occurrence. It seems that the emissions weren't just hot air after all; they were signaling something meaningful – much like the flashing lights of a dashboard warning indicator.
To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly portrays the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Grants Pass and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It's a graph that speaks volumes – almost as much as a car horn in rush hour traffic!
Overall, our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between air pollution and automotive recalls but also bear implications that endure far beyond the realm of statistics and data analysis. It appears that in the world of research, uncovering unexpected relationships can be as exhilarating as a spontaneous detour on a road trip. After all, in the grand scheme of scientific inquiry, sometimes the most singular discoveries are hidden in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have reveled in the peculiar connection between air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. We show that as air pollution levels increase, so do the automotive recalls for Mercedes-Benz vehicles. It's as if the emissions were whispering secrets to our statistical analysis – though instead of secrets, they were sharing a smoky suspicion that demanded our attention.

Our results splendidly corroborate prior research, especially the work of Smith on the impact of air pollution on vehicle performance, which tipped us off to the potential culpability of air quality in vehicular mishaps. It appears that air pollution isn't content with just hanging in the air; it has a knack for stirring up trouble under the hood as well!

Similarly, Doe and Jones' exploration of emissions and automotive safety paved the way for our investigation, hinting at the intricate dance between environmental factors and automotive reliability. Our research boisterously shouts, "They weren't just hinting – they were onto something!" It seems the intersection of air pollution and automotive recalls isn't just a plot in a fictional car tale; it's a real-life quirk of science.

Even in the midst of our scientific pursuit, our team couldn't help but draw inspiration from the non-fiction and fictional works that artfully prodded at the intersection of air pollution and automotive issues. From "The Diesel Dilemma" to "The Smoky Road Ahead," these whimsical titles steered us toward the unexpected link we've uncovered, demonstrating that sometimes, even in the world of academia, a playful nod to creativity can drive new discoveries.

As we navigate the uncharted terrain of quirky correlations and dad jokes, it becomes clear that our findings transcend the realms of mere statistical significance. They speak to the intricacies of the world around us, where the most unexpected relationships can take center stage. It's as if the data had a light-hearted sense of humor, weaving a narrative that aligns with the plot of a mystery novel – though in this case, the mystery unfolds itself through the whims of variables and statistics.

In the spirit of scholarly discovery and the occasional humorous diversion, our research not only sheds light on the unexpected link between air pollution and automotive recalls but also emphasizes the need for an open-minded approach to scientific inquiry. After all, as researchers, we must be prepared to rev our engines and steer into unexplored territories – no matter how unexpected or comical they may seem. And who knows – in the midst of our pursuit, we might just stumble upon a wealth of dad jokes hidden in the data. After all, when it comes to research, sometimes the most illuminating findings are the ones that bring a chuckle along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this whimsically titled paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena appears as surprising as a flat tire on a perfectly sunny day, our research team emerged with findings that would make even the most stoic of academics crack a smile.

Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1982 to 2022, our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01. As we sifted through the data, it became apparent that there was a high degree of association between increased air pollution levels in Grants Pass and a subsequent uptick in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that the emissions weren't the only things catching attention in the air!

The presence of such a robust correlation prompts the inevitable question: are these recalls mere coincidence, or are they reflective of a broader environmental impact? Our findings open the door to a plethora of implications and lend credence to the notion that automotive recalls may have deeper roots than initially suspected. After all, in the world of data analysis, sometimes "diesel" is in the details. As we continue to unravel the threads of this intriguing link, our hope is that this research sparks not only scholarly curiosity but also the occasional chuckle – because even in the world of academia, a good dad joke can drive home a point just as effectively as a statistically significant finding.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in the case of our study, where there's air pollution, there's an intriguing connection to automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research takes a whimsical dive into the surprising relationship between emissions in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of recalls, revealing a correlation that's as unexpected as finding a spare tire in the trunk.
We know what you're thinking: "What do air pollution and automotive recalls have in common? Are we about to embark on a journey through the punny side of science?" Well, buckle up and put on your thinking caps, because we're about to embark on a ride that's as bumpy and unpredictable as a car with a faulty suspension – but fear not, we'll tread lightly on the dad jokes... just "tire"d of them if you ask me!
Our data analysis, drawing from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation archives from 1982 to 2022, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a strong association between air pollution levels in Grants Pass and the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls. It's as if the emissions were blowing the whistle on the automotive industry, revealing a link that's as clear as the smog on a hazy morning.
The statistical significance of this relationship prompts us to ask the unavoidable question: are these recalls an isolated incident, or are they symptomatic of a larger environmental quandary? It seems that in the world of data analysis, even the most unexpected findings can rev our engines of curiosity! After all, in the intricate web of correlation and causation, it's important to remember that sometimes the "diesel" might just be in the details.
As we navigate through this revelatory landscape, our hope is that our research not only intrigues the scientific community but also elicits the occasional chuckle – because in the world of academia, it's not just about the hard numbers; a well-timed pun can be the fuel that drives a point home. So fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a ride that's as illuminating as it is amusing – who knew statistical analysis could be this uplifting?

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our statistical analysis, we found a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA during the years 1982 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 indicates a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It appears that when it comes to air pollution and automotive recalls, they're not just blowing smoke; there's a real connection – and no, we're not just "exhaust"ingly trying to impress you with wordplay!
The r-squared value of 0.5564363 further reinforces this significant association, underscoring the degree to which changes in air pollution levels coincide with fluctuations in the frequency of Mercedes-Benz USA recalls. It's as if the emissions were leaving a trail for us to follow, pointing us in the direction of this unexpected link as unmistakably as a GPS navigation system – though in this case, the route may be more circuitous than a winding road through the mountains.
Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the notion that the relationship between air pollution in Grants Pass and automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA is not a random occurrence. It seems that the emissions weren't just hot air after all; they were signaling something meaningful – much like the flashing lights of a dashboard warning indicator.
To visually illustrate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly portrays the strong positive relationship between air pollution levels in Grants Pass and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It's a graph that speaks volumes – almost as much as a car horn in rush hour traffic!
Overall, our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between air pollution and automotive recalls but also bear implications that endure far beyond the realm of statistics and data analysis. It appears that in the world of research, uncovering unexpected relationships can be as exhilarating as a spontaneous detour on a road trip. After all, in the grand scheme of scientific inquiry, sometimes the most singular discoveries are hidden in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a compelling link between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. The statistical analysis has substantiated a robust correlation, leaving us to ponder if these recalls are merely a byproduct of environmental factors or indicative of broader industry-wide implications. It's as if the emissions were sending smoke signals spelling out "recalls ahead"!

As we navigate through these revelatory findings, we can't help but recognize the humor in uncovering such an unexpected connection. It's almost as surprising as finding a spare tire in the trunk, but hey, we're not "tire"d of these serendipitous discoveries just yet!

The statistical significance of our results, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01, reinforces the undeniable association between air pollution and automotive recalls. It's as if the emissions were revving their engines, eager to catch our attention and guide us down this winding road of correlation. These findings are as clear as the smog on a hazy morning – and surely, there's no need to put on rose-tinted glasses to see the implications!

But fear not, fellow academicians, the exploration of this unexpected correlation hasn't driven us to "exhaust"ion. And though we might seem like we're just "fueling" around, we assure you that no more research is needed in this area – unless, of course, we encounter a cosmic shift in the universe where automotive recalls start causing air pollution! But until then, let's shift gears and direct our scholarly pursuits to equally enlightening and amusing avenues.

After all, in the grand domain of academic inquiry, sometimes the most remarkable discoveries are nestled in the most unexpected relationships. And if our research has demonstrated anything, it's that statistical analysis can be as uplifting as a good dad joke - so buckle up and enjoy the ride!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Automotive Emissions Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Clean Air and Sustainable Transportation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Driving through the Smog: The Diesel Dirty Truth Behind Mercedes-Benz USA Recalls with an abstract of In this whimsically titled paper, we delve into the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Grants Pass, Oregon, and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. While the correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena appears as surprising as a flat tire on a perfectly sunny day, our research team emerged with findings that would make even the most stoic of academics crack a smile.
Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the US Department of Transportation spanning the years 1982 to 2022, our statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7459466 and a p-value less than 0.01. As we sifted through the data, it became apparent that there was a high degree of association between increased air pollution levels in Grants Pass and a subsequent uptick in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that the emissions weren't the only things catching attention in the air!
The presence of such a robust correlation prompts the inevitable question: are these recalls mere coincidence, or are they reflective of a broader environmental impact? Our findings open the door to a plethora of implications and lend credence to the notion that automotive recalls may have deeper roots than initially suspected. After all, in the world of data analysis, sometimes "diesel" is in the details. As we continue to unravel the threads of this intriguing link, our hope is that this research sparks not only scholarly curiosity but also the occasional chuckle – because even in the world of academia, a good dad joke can drive home a point just as effectively as a statistically significant finding.

ChatGPT:

Mercedes-Benz USA, diesel emissions, air pollution, automotive recalls, Grants Pass, Oregon, Environmental Protection Agency, US Department of Transportation, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, data analysis, environmental impact, automotive emissions, academic research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Grants Pass, OR
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon

Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA

Correlation r = 0.7459466 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5564363 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon) over the 41 years from 1982 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.2E-8. 0.0000000218007673682311030000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 2.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 45,869,945 random variables You don't actually need 45 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 40 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 40 because we have two variables measured over a period of 41 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.86 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon (Bad air quality days)0.0055096400.00549451000.00274725000000000000000000.00273973000.0027322400000.035616400.0054794500.04383560.06060610.005479450.06010930.02465750.0191781
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA (Recalls)0232122031132231244653455383348461823383933384935




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.00550964,0,0.00549451,0,0,0.00274725,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00273973,0,0,0.00273224,0,0,0,0,0.0356164,0,0.00547945,0,0.0438356,0.0606061,0.00547945,0.0601093,0.0246575,0.0191781,])
array_2 = np.array([0,2,3,2,1,2,2,0,3,1,1,3,2,2,3,1,2,4,4,6,5,3,4,5,5,3,8,3,3,4,8,4,6,18,23,38,39,33,38,49,35,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Grants Pass, Oregon"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2341 · Black Variable ID: 21539 · Red Variable ID: 1122
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0