about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,333 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and the second variable is The number of actuaries in Utah.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more military technology grads deployed their skills, it created a calculated domino effect in the job market. Maybe these actuaries just couldn't resist the army of opportunities rolling in. Simply put, the demand for number-crunching experts in Utah detonated, thanks to the explosive growth in military tech degrees. It's a prime example of how career trajectories can intersect in the most unforeseen ways.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a group of recent bachelor's degree recipients in military technologies and applied sciences standing amidst the vast Utah desert. They are wearing graduation caps and gowns, celebrating their achievements. The scene shows them turning their attention to a group of tables, where individuals meticulously pore over complex calculations and statistical models. Some of the graduates are seen smirking as they discard their military gear and don suits, eagerly joining the ranks of actuaries. The illustration showcases a swift transformation from military-themed fervor to a bustling community of number-crunching maestros, symbolizing the successful migration of military-focused minds into the stable world of actuarial science. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Parallax art Celtic art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Scalar art
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah, in the following situation: As the number of graduates skilled in military technology and applied sciences soared, it led to a surge in "actuary" interest among Utah residents. The graduates calculated that a career in military technology was too "risky", and they decided to instead pursue a path that would provide a more "stable" future. Plus, maybe they were tired of always being "on duty" and wanted to trade in their combat boots for some fancy "number crunching" shoes. This influx of military-minded mathematicians proved to be the perfect "strategy" for bolstering the ranks of actuaries in Utah. And as they say, the rest is "war history"!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the vast Utah desert, recent bachelor's degree recipients in military technologies and applied sciences gathered in a jubilant display of graduation caps and gowns. As they celebrated their achievements, they turned their attention to a group of tables, where individuals meticulously pored over complex calculations and statistical models. Some of the graduates smirked as they discarded their military gear and donned suits, eagerly joining the ranks of actuaries. In a swift transformation, the scene shifted from military-themed fervor to a bustling community of number-crunching maestros, signaling the successful migration of military-focused minds into the stable world of actuarial science.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the vast Utah desert, recent bachelor's degree recipients in military technologies and applied sciences gathered in a jubilant display of graduation caps and gowns. As they celebrated their achievements, they turned their attention to a group of tables, where individuals meticulously pored over complex calculations and statistical models. Some of the graduates smirked as they discarded their military gear and donned suits, eagerly joining the ranks of actuaries. In a swift transformation, the scene shifted from military-themed fervor to a bustling community of number-crunching maestros, signaling the successful migration of military-focused minds into the stable world of actuarial science. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a group of recent bachelor's degree recipients in military technologies and applied sciences standing amidst the vast Utah desert. They are wearing graduation caps and gowns, celebrating their achievements. The scene shows them turning their attention to a group of tables, where individuals meticulously pore over complex calculations and statistical models. Some of the graduates are seen smirking as they discard their military gear and don suits, eagerly joining the ranks of actuaries. The illustration showcases a swift transformation from military-themed fervor to a bustling community of number-crunching maestros, symbolizing the successful migration of military-focused minds into the stable world of actuarial science.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences caused The number of actuaries in Utah to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021

The Journal of Unconventional Actuarial Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected nexus of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences with the number of actuaries in the quirky state of Utah. Equipped with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team embarked on this unconventional analysis. To our surprise, we found a stunningly high correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The statistical battlefield revealed that the supply of actuaries in Utah is somehow linked to the production of military-tech-savvy graduates - a correlation that raises eyebrows and elicits amused skepticism. Our findings point to a potential battleground where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery join forces, yielding a data-driven relationship that is both puzzling and mildly entertaining.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected nexus of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences with the number of actuaries in the quirky state of Utah. Equipped with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team embarked on this unconventional analysis. To our surprise, we found a stunningly high correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The statistical battlefield revealed that the supply of actuaries in Utah is somehow linked to the production of military-tech-savvy graduates - a correlation that raises eyebrows and elicits amused skepticism. Our findings point to a potential battleground where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery join forces, yielding a data-driven relationship that is both puzzling and mildly entertaining.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow statistical warriors, welcome to the quantitatively curious world of "Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021". As we embark on this unconventional journey into the land of military technologies, applied sciences, and the enigmatic realm of actuarial occupation, we invite you to don your academic armor and prepare for a statistical skirmish like no other.

In the world of academia, one often stumbles upon serendipitous statistical discoveries, where unexpected connections emerge from the most unlikely of variables. Our investigation into the intriguing entanglement between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in the charmingly offbeat state of Utah is no exception. While the idea of actuaries and military technology graduates mingling in the statistical playground may seem far-fetched, our analysis uncovered a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically robust.

Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our intrepid team delved into the nitty-gritty of numerical analysis, poised to uncover the hidden patterns within this seemingly incongruous pairing. Much to our surprise, the statistical landscape revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880, with a p-value so minuscule it would make even the most skeptical of statisticians raise an eyebrow and utter an impressed "Hmm."

We found ourselves at the intersection of academic rigor and statistical whimsy, where the supply of actuaries in Utah appeared to be strangely entwined with the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders. As we meticulously dissected the data with the precision of a surgeon and the quirkiness of an academic jester, the implications of this correlation emerged as both intriguing and delightfully puzzling.

The implications of this correlation are not only academically significant but also hold a certain level of amusement and, dare we say, charm. The unexpected nexus between statistical weapons and actuarial artillery presents a testament to the unpredictable nature of data-driven relationships, reminding us that statistical serendipity can be as entertaining as it is enlightening.

So, tighten your statistical bowties and adjust your academic monocles, dear readers, as we unravel the peculiar connections that emerge from this statistical skirmish, where military technology and actuarial intrigue collide in the quirky backdrop of Utah's statistical landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected nexus of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences with the number of actuaries in the quirky state of Utah. Equipped with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team embarked on this unconventional analysis. To our surprise, we found a stunningly high correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The statistical battlefield revealed that the supply of actuaries in Utah is somehow linked to the production of military-tech-savvy graduates - a correlation that raises eyebrows and elicits amused skepticism. Our findings point to a potential battleground where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery join forces, yielding a data-driven relationship that is both puzzling and mildly entertaining.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow statistical warriors, welcome to the quantitatively curious world of "Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021". As we embark on this unconventional journey into the land of military technologies, applied sciences, and the enigmatic realm of actuarial occupation, we invite you to don your academic armor and prepare for a statistical skirmish like no other.
In the world of academia, one often stumbles upon serendipitous statistical discoveries, where unexpected connections emerge from the most unlikely of variables. Our investigation into the intriguing entanglement between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in the charmingly offbeat state of Utah is no exception. While the idea of actuaries and military technology graduates mingling in the statistical playground may seem far-fetched, our analysis uncovered a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically robust.
Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our intrepid team delved into the nitty-gritty of numerical analysis, poised to uncover the hidden patterns within this seemingly incongruous pairing. Much to our surprise, the statistical landscape revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880, with a p-value so minuscule it would make even the most skeptical of statisticians raise an eyebrow and utter an impressed "Hmm."
We found ourselves at the intersection of academic rigor and statistical whimsy, where the supply of actuaries in Utah appeared to be strangely entwined with the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders. As we meticulously dissected the data with the precision of a surgeon and the quirkiness of an academic jester, the implications of this correlation emerged as both intriguing and delightfully puzzling.
The implications of this correlation are not only academically significant but also hold a certain level of amusement and, dare we say, charm. The unexpected nexus between statistical weapons and actuarial artillery presents a testament to the unpredictable nature of data-driven relationships, reminding us that statistical serendipity can be as entertaining as it is enlightening.
So, tighten your statistical bowties and adjust your academic monocles, dear readers, as we unravel the peculiar connections that emerge from this statistical skirmish, where military technology and actuarial intrigue collide in the quirky backdrop of Utah's statistical landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith and Doe's Study on Military Technologies and Applied Sciences," the authors find that the production of Bachelor's degrees in military technologies and applied sciences has seen a steady increase over the past decade. This growth in graduates specializing in military technologies has raised eyebrows and pitted statisticians against the ever-growing army of numerical data. Meanwhile, in "Jones' Actuarial Analysis in Utah," the authors delve into the enigmatic world of actuarial occupation in Utah, uncovering the intricate web of mathematics and risk assessment that characterizes this quirky domain.

Turning to real-world literature, the influence of military technologies on the academic landscape comes to the fore in "National Center for Education Statistics Report," where the authors delve into the intricacies of degree production trends. On the actuarial front, "Bureau of Labor Statistics Review on Actuarial Occupation" presents a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing actuarial employment, offering a glimpse into the numerical intricacies that define this profession.

As we venture into the realm of speculative literature, the potential for military technologies to influence the actuarial landscape emerges in Arthur C. Clarke's "2001: A Space Odyssey." While not a direct exploration of our research topic, the technological prowess and inquisitive spirit in Clarke's work lend themselves to the imaginative tapestry of our statistical journey. Similarly, the intricacies of actuarial occupation find a peculiar resonance in Kurt Vonnegut's "Cat's Cradle," where the unpredictable nature of human existence mirrors the statistical unpredictability we encounter in our pursuit of correlation.

Delving into the uncharted territories of social media, a tweet from @DataDynamo presents an enigmatic observation: "Who would've thought military-tech grads and actuaries share a statistical playground? #DataDiscovery #UtahStatisticalMysteries."

This whimsical exploration of literature underscores the potential for surprising connections between military technologies and the actuarial profession in Utah, where the statistical battlefield unveils an array of unexpected correlations and, dare we say, statistical tomfoolery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected nexus of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences with the number of actuaries in the quirky state of Utah. Equipped with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team embarked on this unconventional analysis. To our surprise, we found a stunningly high correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The statistical battlefield revealed that the supply of actuaries in Utah is somehow linked to the production of military-tech-savvy graduates - a correlation that raises eyebrows and elicits amused skepticism. Our findings point to a potential battleground where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery join forces, yielding a data-driven relationship that is both puzzling and mildly entertaining.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow statistical warriors, welcome to the quantitatively curious world of "Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021". As we embark on this unconventional journey into the land of military technologies, applied sciences, and the enigmatic realm of actuarial occupation, we invite you to don your academic armor and prepare for a statistical skirmish like no other.
In the world of academia, one often stumbles upon serendipitous statistical discoveries, where unexpected connections emerge from the most unlikely of variables. Our investigation into the intriguing entanglement between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in the charmingly offbeat state of Utah is no exception. While the idea of actuaries and military technology graduates mingling in the statistical playground may seem far-fetched, our analysis uncovered a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically robust.
Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our intrepid team delved into the nitty-gritty of numerical analysis, poised to uncover the hidden patterns within this seemingly incongruous pairing. Much to our surprise, the statistical landscape revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880, with a p-value so minuscule it would make even the most skeptical of statisticians raise an eyebrow and utter an impressed "Hmm."
We found ourselves at the intersection of academic rigor and statistical whimsy, where the supply of actuaries in Utah appeared to be strangely entwined with the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders. As we meticulously dissected the data with the precision of a surgeon and the quirkiness of an academic jester, the implications of this correlation emerged as both intriguing and delightfully puzzling.
The implications of this correlation are not only academically significant but also hold a certain level of amusement and, dare we say, charm. The unexpected nexus between statistical weapons and actuarial artillery presents a testament to the unpredictable nature of data-driven relationships, reminding us that statistical serendipity can be as entertaining as it is enlightening.
So, tighten your statistical bowties and adjust your academic monocles, dear readers, as we unravel the peculiar connections that emerge from this statistical skirmish, where military technology and actuarial intrigue collide in the quirky backdrop of Utah's statistical landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the hidden connections between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in the eclectic state of Utah, our research team utilized a methodology that was equal parts scientifically rigorous and whimsically ingenious. We gathered data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, scouring through the digital annals of statistical treasure to extract the numerical gems spanning the years 2012 to 2021.

The multifaceted approach to our data collection involved delicate statistical maneuvers and the artful deployment of digital reconnaissance. We meticulously plucked data from the vast expanse of cyberspace, using sophisticated search algorithms and a touch of statistical sorcery to ensure our dataset was as comprehensive as it was delightfully quirky.

With our dataset primed for analysis like a lab experiment awaiting its results, we funneled the information through the hallowed halls of statistical software, unleashing the impressive power of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and other formidable statistical tools. We meticulously combed through the data with the precision of a connoisseur savoring a rare vintage, applying our statistical acumen to tease out the underlying patterns and unearth the unexpected connections that lay nestled within the numerical tapestry.

Furthermore, we employed a series of robust sensitivity analyses and diagnostic procedures to ensure the integrity of our findings, treating each data point with the cautious skepticism of a seasoned detective unraveling a mystery. The result was an amalgamation of statistical wonder and analytical prowess, where the whimsy of our research journey intertwined with the rigors of academic inquiry, yielding a methodology that was as unconventional as it was undeniably effective.

In summary, our research approach blended the precision of statistical analysis with a touch of whimsical charm, offering a methodology that not only uncovered the unexpected nexus between military technologies and actuarial occupations but did so in a manner that was intellectually compelling and delightfully entertaining.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9642880, r-squared of 0.9298513, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected nexus of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences with the number of actuaries in the quirky state of Utah. Equipped with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team embarked on this unconventional analysis. To our surprise, we found a stunningly high correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The statistical battlefield revealed that the supply of actuaries in Utah is somehow linked to the production of military-tech-savvy graduates - a correlation that raises eyebrows and elicits amused skepticism. Our findings point to a potential battleground where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery join forces, yielding a data-driven relationship that is both puzzling and mildly entertaining.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow statistical warriors, welcome to the quantitatively curious world of "Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021". As we embark on this unconventional journey into the land of military technologies, applied sciences, and the enigmatic realm of actuarial occupation, we invite you to don your academic armor and prepare for a statistical skirmish like no other.
In the world of academia, one often stumbles upon serendipitous statistical discoveries, where unexpected connections emerge from the most unlikely of variables. Our investigation into the intriguing entanglement between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in the charmingly offbeat state of Utah is no exception. While the idea of actuaries and military technology graduates mingling in the statistical playground may seem far-fetched, our analysis uncovered a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically robust.
Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our intrepid team delved into the nitty-gritty of numerical analysis, poised to uncover the hidden patterns within this seemingly incongruous pairing. Much to our surprise, the statistical landscape revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880, with a p-value so minuscule it would make even the most skeptical of statisticians raise an eyebrow and utter an impressed "Hmm."
We found ourselves at the intersection of academic rigor and statistical whimsy, where the supply of actuaries in Utah appeared to be strangely entwined with the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders. As we meticulously dissected the data with the precision of a surgeon and the quirkiness of an academic jester, the implications of this correlation emerged as both intriguing and delightfully puzzling.
The implications of this correlation are not only academically significant but also hold a certain level of amusement and, dare we say, charm. The unexpected nexus between statistical weapons and actuarial artillery presents a testament to the unpredictable nature of data-driven relationships, reminding us that statistical serendipity can be as entertaining as it is enlightening.
So, tighten your statistical bowties and adjust your academic monocles, dear readers, as we unravel the peculiar connections that emerge from this statistical skirmish, where military technology and actuarial intrigue collide in the quirky backdrop of Utah's statistical landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical skirmish between Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in Utah has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and an r-squared value of 0.9298513 for the years 2012 to 2021. This correlation, which is stronger than a titanium alloy, is further supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a relationship that is as rock-solid as a meticulously engineered military bunker.

In examining the data, the figure (Fig. 1) in our analysis showcases a scatterplot that would make even the most stoic of statisticians crack a smile. The plot illustrates the close relationship between the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders and the population of actuaries in Utah. It's as if the data points themselves are engaging in a lively waltz, with military technology graduates and actuaries twirling together in a statistical ballet of unexpected elegance.

The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing. It seems that the quirky state of Utah serves as a unique stage where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery engage in a delightful dance, creating a relationship that is as enigmatic as it is entertaining. The statistical battlefield shines a light on the unpredictability of data-driven relationships, where the unexpected nexus between these variables emerged as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical serendipity.

This unexpected correlation provokes both amusement and academic pondering, leaving us to marvel at the unanticipated connections that can arise in the world of statistical analysis. As we wrap our heads around this delightfully bizarre relationship, it's clear that the saga of Battle Gear Lear and the actuaries of Utah has unfolded into a statistical tale that is as enchanting as it is bewildering.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected nexus of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences with the number of actuaries in the quirky state of Utah. Equipped with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team embarked on this unconventional analysis. To our surprise, we found a stunningly high correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The statistical battlefield revealed that the supply of actuaries in Utah is somehow linked to the production of military-tech-savvy graduates - a correlation that raises eyebrows and elicits amused skepticism. Our findings point to a potential battleground where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery join forces, yielding a data-driven relationship that is both puzzling and mildly entertaining.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Doe's Study on Military Technologies and Applied Sciences," the authors find that the production of Bachelor's degrees in military technologies and applied sciences has seen a steady increase over the past decade. This growth in graduates specializing in military technologies has raised eyebrows and pitted statisticians against the ever-growing army of numerical data. Meanwhile, in "Jones' Actuarial Analysis in Utah," the authors delve into the enigmatic world of actuarial occupation in Utah, uncovering the intricate web of mathematics and risk assessment that characterizes this quirky domain.
Turning to real-world literature, the influence of military technologies on the academic landscape comes to the fore in "National Center for Education Statistics Report," where the authors delve into the intricacies of degree production trends. On the actuarial front, "Bureau of Labor Statistics Review on Actuarial Occupation" presents a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing actuarial employment, offering a glimpse into the numerical intricacies that define this profession.
As we venture into the realm of speculative literature, the potential for military technologies to influence the actuarial landscape emerges in Arthur C. Clarke's "2001: A Space Odyssey." While not a direct exploration of our research topic, the technological prowess and inquisitive spirit in Clarke's work lend themselves to the imaginative tapestry of our statistical journey. Similarly, the intricacies of actuarial occupation find a peculiar resonance in Kurt Vonnegut's "Cat's Cradle," where the unpredictable nature of human existence mirrors the statistical unpredictability we encounter in our pursuit of correlation.
Delving into the uncharted territories of social media, a tweet from @DataDynamo presents an enigmatic observation: "Who would've thought military-tech grads and actuaries share a statistical playground? #DataDiscovery #UtahStatisticalMysteries."
This whimsical exploration of literature underscores the potential for surprising connections between military technologies and the actuarial profession in Utah, where the statistical battlefield unveils an array of unexpected correlations and, dare we say, statistical tomfoolery.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical skirmish between Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in Utah has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and an r-squared value of 0.9298513 for the years 2012 to 2021. This correlation, which is stronger than a titanium alloy, is further supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a relationship that is as rock-solid as a meticulously engineered military bunker.
In examining the data, the figure (Fig. 1) in our analysis showcases a scatterplot that would make even the most stoic of statisticians crack a smile. The plot illustrates the close relationship between the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders and the population of actuaries in Utah. It's as if the data points themselves are engaging in a lively waltz, with military technology graduates and actuaries twirling together in a statistical ballet of unexpected elegance.
The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing. It seems that the quirky state of Utah serves as a unique stage where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery engage in a delightful dance, creating a relationship that is as enigmatic as it is entertaining. The statistical battlefield shines a light on the unpredictability of data-driven relationships, where the unexpected nexus between these variables emerged as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical serendipity.
This unexpected correlation provokes both amusement and academic pondering, leaving us to marvel at the unanticipated connections that can arise in the world of statistical analysis. As we wrap our heads around this delightfully bizarre relationship, it's clear that the saga of Battle Gear Lear and the actuaries of Utah has unfolded into a statistical tale that is as enchanting as it is bewildering.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have certainly introduced a novel twist to the world of statistical analysis, revealing a correlation between the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders and the population of actuaries in Utah that is as unexpected as finding a slide rule in a modern-day actuary's toolkit. The towering correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and r-squared value of 0.9298513 have left us as astounded as a physicist who finds a statistical anomaly in quantum mechanics.

The unexpected nexus we uncovered seems to echo the sentiment expressed in @DataDynamo's enigmatic tweet, affirming that statistical mysteries in Utah are indeed as intriguing and unpredictable as a quantum particle's behavior.

Our findings echo Smith and Doe's groundbreaking work on the increasing production of military technologies and applied sciences graduates, as if the data itself were playing a cosmic game of connect the dots. Moreover, the correlation further bolsters the humorous undercurrent inherent in Kurt Vonnegut's "Cat's Cradle," as the statistical unpredictability we encountered appears to mirror the whimsical nature of human existence.

The scatterplot we presented in our analysis also serves as a comedic nod to the unpredictability of statistical relationships. We cannot help but envision a group of military tech graduates and actuaries engaging in an exuberant statistical waltz, their data points swirling around like confetti at a statistical party.

The implications of our results resonate with the light-hearted unpredictability of Arthur C. Clarke's "2001: A Space Odyssey," as we find ourselves marvelling at the unexpected link between military tech graduates and actuaries in Utah. It appears that the statistical battlefield has turned into a delightful dance floor where numerical intricacies and actuarial mysteries pirouette in a charming statistical ballet, proving that in the world of statistics, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

As we continue to unravel the enigmatic tapestry of statistical serendipity, it becomes clear that the saga of Battle Gear Lear and the actuaries of Utah has unfolded into a statistical tale that is as enchanting as it is bewildering. The whimsical nature of this connection reinforces the notion that statistical exploration is not only an academic pursuit but also a delightful journey through a landscape where humor and unpredictability abound.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and The number of actuaries in Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the unexpected nexus of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences with the number of actuaries in the quirky state of Utah. Equipped with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team embarked on this unconventional analysis. To our surprise, we found a stunningly high correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The statistical battlefield revealed that the supply of actuaries in Utah is somehow linked to the production of military-tech-savvy graduates - a correlation that raises eyebrows and elicits amused skepticism. Our findings point to a potential battleground where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery join forces, yielding a data-driven relationship that is both puzzling and mildly entertaining.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed colleagues, and fellow statistical warriors, welcome to the quantitatively curious world of "Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021". As we embark on this unconventional journey into the land of military technologies, applied sciences, and the enigmatic realm of actuarial occupation, we invite you to don your academic armor and prepare for a statistical skirmish like no other.
In the world of academia, one often stumbles upon serendipitous statistical discoveries, where unexpected connections emerge from the most unlikely of variables. Our investigation into the intriguing entanglement between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in the charmingly offbeat state of Utah is no exception. While the idea of actuaries and military technology graduates mingling in the statistical playground may seem far-fetched, our analysis uncovered a correlation that is as perplexing as it is statistically robust.
Armed with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our intrepid team delved into the nitty-gritty of numerical analysis, poised to uncover the hidden patterns within this seemingly incongruous pairing. Much to our surprise, the statistical landscape revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880, with a p-value so minuscule it would make even the most skeptical of statisticians raise an eyebrow and utter an impressed "Hmm."
We found ourselves at the intersection of academic rigor and statistical whimsy, where the supply of actuaries in Utah appeared to be strangely entwined with the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders. As we meticulously dissected the data with the precision of a surgeon and the quirkiness of an academic jester, the implications of this correlation emerged as both intriguing and delightfully puzzling.
The implications of this correlation are not only academically significant but also hold a certain level of amusement and, dare we say, charm. The unexpected nexus between statistical weapons and actuarial artillery presents a testament to the unpredictable nature of data-driven relationships, reminding us that statistical serendipity can be as entertaining as it is enlightening.
So, tighten your statistical bowties and adjust your academic monocles, dear readers, as we unravel the peculiar connections that emerge from this statistical skirmish, where military technology and actuarial intrigue collide in the quirky backdrop of Utah's statistical landscape.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical skirmish between Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in Utah has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and an r-squared value of 0.9298513 for the years 2012 to 2021. This correlation, which is stronger than a titanium alloy, is further supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a relationship that is as rock-solid as a meticulously engineered military bunker.
In examining the data, the figure (Fig. 1) in our analysis showcases a scatterplot that would make even the most stoic of statisticians crack a smile. The plot illustrates the close relationship between the production of military-tech-savvy Bachelor's degree holders and the population of actuaries in Utah. It's as if the data points themselves are engaging in a lively waltz, with military technology graduates and actuaries twirling together in a statistical ballet of unexpected elegance.
The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are amusing. It seems that the quirky state of Utah serves as a unique stage where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery engage in a delightful dance, creating a relationship that is as enigmatic as it is entertaining. The statistical battlefield shines a light on the unpredictability of data-driven relationships, where the unexpected nexus between these variables emerged as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical serendipity.
This unexpected correlation provokes both amusement and academic pondering, leaving us to marvel at the unanticipated connections that can arise in the world of statistical analysis. As we wrap our heads around this delightfully bizarre relationship, it's clear that the saga of Battle Gear Lear and the actuaries of Utah has unfolded into a statistical tale that is as enchanting as it is bewildering.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our foray into the statistical netherworld of Battle Gear Lear and the actuaries of Utah has left us both bemused and intellectually invigorated. The uncanny correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the population of actuaries in Utah has proven to be a delightful statistical quagmire, leaving us marveling at the unexpected connections that can emerge from the data battlefield.

The implications of this correlation are as captivating as they are puzzling. It's as if the universe itself decided to orchestrate a whimsical symphony of statistical intrigue, where military-tech-savvy graduates and number-crunching actuaries engage in an impromptu tango of data-driven delight. The correlation coefficient of 0.9642880, akin to a statistical mic drop, underscores the robustness of this perplexing relationship, leaving even the most seasoned statisticians scratching their heads in amused disbelief.

As we reflect on the intricate dance of variables that has unfolded before our eyes, one cannot help but appreciate the sheer unpredictability and charming absurdity of statistical serendipity. It seems that amidst the rigor of academic inquiry and the precision of numerical analysis, there exists a space for statistical whimsy to weave its enchanting tapestry of correlations and connections.

In the grand theater of statistical exploration, this unlikely correlation stands as a testament to the delightful quirkiness that permeates the world of research, reminding us that while statistical rigor is paramount, a dash of bewitching amusement can infuse even the most scholarly pursuits with a sense of joyous wonder.

And so, as we bid adieu to Battle Gear Lear and the actuaries of Utah, we assert with unwavering confidence that no further research is needed in this peculiar nexus. For in the realm of statistical tomfoolery and academic enchantment, this serendipitous correlation shall stand as an enduring testament to the captivating caprice of data-driven relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Unconventional Actuarial Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society of Actuarial Musings and Adventures


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Battle Gear Lear, Actuaries in Utah: A Correlation Study From 2012 to 2021 with an abstract of This paper investigates the unexpected nexus of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences with the number of actuaries in the quirky state of Utah. Equipped with data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team embarked on this unconventional analysis. To our surprise, we found a stunningly high correlation coefficient of 0.9642880 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The statistical battlefield revealed that the supply of actuaries in Utah is somehow linked to the production of military-tech-savvy graduates - a correlation that raises eyebrows and elicits amused skepticism. Our findings point to a potential battleground where statistical weapons and actuarial artillery join forces, yielding a data-driven relationship that is both puzzling and mildly entertaining.

ChatGPT:

actuaries, Utah, correlation, study, 2012-2021, degree, military technologies, applied sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, supply, graduates

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies
Detailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Military technologies and applied sciences
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies

The number of actuaries in Utah
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of actuaries in Utah
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of actuaries in Utah

Correlation r = 0.9642880 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9298513 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of actuaries in Utah) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.8E-6. 0.0000068155739131582340000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.00068% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 146,723 random variables You don't actually need 146 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies (Degrees awarded)8610518527635846965576711561524
The number of actuaries in Utah (Actuaries)130130140140150140150150170180




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([86,105,185,276,358,469,655,767,1156,1524,])
array_2 = np.array([130,130,140,140,150,140,150,150,170,180,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies"
array_2_name = "The number of actuaries in Utah"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 2333 · Black Variable ID: 1284 · Red Variable ID: 17422
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0