about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,326 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the second variable is The number of survey researchers in New Jersey.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Lukas Podolski scores more goals, local soccer fans in New Jersey experience increased levels of excitement and happiness. This, in turn, leads to a higher demand for surveys to measure their elevated levels of fan satisfaction and engagement with the sport. It's a case of "The more Podolski scores, the more Jersey gets sur-veyed!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: In a vibrant, colorful soccer stadium in Germany, the stands are filled with cheering fans wearing jerseys representing various teams. The field is a patchwork of bright green grass, with Lukas Podolski, a charming animated character, leaping mid-air as he scores his 51st domestic match goal. His teammates rush to congratulate him amidst the roar of the crowd. In the stands, a group of endearing survey researchers from New Jersey are shown eagerly taking notes and collecting data on the spectators' engagement with the game, using quirky gadgets and smiling as they observe the excitement around them. The entire scene radiates energy and joy, capturing the essence of a heartwarming Pixar movie. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Cubism Cutsy graphics An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling soccer stadium in Germany, Lukas Podolski celebrates as he scores his 51st domestic match goal while in the stands, a group of survey researchers from New Jersey eagerly take notes and collect data on the spectators' engagement with the game.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling soccer stadium in Germany, Lukas Podolski celebrates as he scores his 51st domestic match goal while in the stands, a group of survey researchers from New Jersey eagerly take notes and collect data on the spectators' engagement with the game. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: In a vibrant, colorful soccer stadium in Germany, the stands are filled with cheering fans wearing jerseys representing various teams. The field is a patchwork of bright green grass, with Lukas Podolski, a charming animated character, leaping mid-air as he scores his 51st domestic match goal. His teammates rush to congratulate him amidst the roar of the crowd. In the stands, a group of endearing survey researchers from New Jersey are shown eagerly taking notes and collecting data on the spectators' engagement with the game, using quirky gadgets and smiling as they observe the excitement around them. The entire scene radiates energy and joy, capturing the essence of a heartwarming Pixar movie.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count positively influenced The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Social Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of academic research, we often strive to uncover meaningful correlations, seeking to connect the seemingly unconnected. In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between the domestic match goal count of former footballer Lukas Podolski and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between sports and research statistics, demonstrating that sometimes the most unexpected connections can yield surprising results.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of academic research, we often strive to uncover meaningful correlations, seeking to connect the seemingly unconnected. In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between the domestic match goal count of former footballer Lukas Podolski and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between sports and research statistics, demonstrating that sometimes the most unexpected connections can yield surprising results.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of academic inquiry, the search for relationships between disparate phenomena often leads us down unexpected and intriguing paths. While it may seem nothing could be further apart than the thrilling world of football and the meticulous domain of survey research, our investigation into the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey unfurls a delightful tapestry of statistical curiosity.

As we embark upon this intellectual odyssey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy in our pursuit. The very notion of juxtaposing the prolific goal-scoring prowess of the esteemed Lukas Podolski with the scholarly endeavors of survey researchers may appear, at first glance, as preposterous as a soccer match played with a beach ball. However, as we dive deeper into the data, we are certain to uncover insights that are as unexpected as a goalkeeper scoring a hat-trick.

This study is not merely an exercise in academic jocularity. Rather, it represents a genuine effort to shed light on the uncanny confluence of athletic achievement and statistical rigor. While we approach this subject with the requisite seriousness befitting scholarly research, we also embrace the whimsical spirit that characterizes our quest.

As our exploration unfolds, we invite our readers to join us in a journey that is as enthralling as witnessing an underdog team triumph against all odds. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready to kick off this lighthearted yet thought-provoking foray into the surprising parallels between sports and research statistics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of academic research, we often strive to uncover meaningful correlations, seeking to connect the seemingly unconnected. In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between the domestic match goal count of former footballer Lukas Podolski and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between sports and research statistics, demonstrating that sometimes the most unexpected connections can yield surprising results.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, the search for relationships between disparate phenomena often leads us down unexpected and intriguing paths. While it may seem nothing could be further apart than the thrilling world of football and the meticulous domain of survey research, our investigation into the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey unfurls a delightful tapestry of statistical curiosity.
As we embark upon this intellectual odyssey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy in our pursuit. The very notion of juxtaposing the prolific goal-scoring prowess of the esteemed Lukas Podolski with the scholarly endeavors of survey researchers may appear, at first glance, as preposterous as a soccer match played with a beach ball. However, as we dive deeper into the data, we are certain to uncover insights that are as unexpected as a goalkeeper scoring a hat-trick.
This study is not merely an exercise in academic jocularity. Rather, it represents a genuine effort to shed light on the uncanny confluence of athletic achievement and statistical rigor. While we approach this subject with the requisite seriousness befitting scholarly research, we also embrace the whimsical spirit that characterizes our quest.
As our exploration unfolds, we invite our readers to join us in a journey that is as enthralling as witnessing an underdog team triumph against all odds. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready to kick off this lighthearted yet thought-provoking foray into the surprising parallels between sports and research statistics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The quest to unravel the mysterious connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey is not without precedent. Smith et al. (2010) investigated the potential correlations between sports statistics and labor market trends, setting the stage for our own inquiry into this offbeat intersection. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) ventured into the uncharted territory of athlete achievements and research demographics, laying the groundwork for our exploration. However, their work lacks the definitive flair and comedic edge infused within our own study, which surely sets it apart.

In "Sports and Labor: A Statistical Perspective," the authors delve into the unexpected correlations between athletic achievements and labor market dynamics, but perhaps missed the delightful charm we bring to our investigation. Furthermore, "Demographics and Athletics: A Surprising Connection" offers a glimpse into the unexplored territory of sports and research, though they failed to capture the whimsical spirit that infuses our own scholarly endeavors.

Drawing inspiration from non-fiction works related to statistical analysis, we turn to "Freakonomics" for its unconventional examination of seemingly unrelated phenomena and "The Tipping Point" for its exploration of unexpected connections. On the other hand, the fiction genre offers us "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" as a playful nod to the unexpected insights that drive our investigation and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" as a lighthearted reminder that the most unlikely of pairings can lead to quite the adventure.

Further probing into the realm of whimsy, we find inspiration from board games such as Clue, where the search for connections leads to unexpected revelations, and Snakes and Ladders, where unpredictability reigns supreme – much like the nature of our correlation exploration.

In sum, while our pursuit may appear to be a departure from conventional academic inquiry, it is backed by a foundation of serious statistical analysis and a genuine desire to uncover the unexpected. With a nod to both the whimsical and the rigorous, we embark upon this journey with a hearty dose of curiosity and humor, eager to illuminate the unexplored links between the world of sports and the realm of research statistics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of academic research, we often strive to uncover meaningful correlations, seeking to connect the seemingly unconnected. In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between the domestic match goal count of former footballer Lukas Podolski and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between sports and research statistics, demonstrating that sometimes the most unexpected connections can yield surprising results.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, the search for relationships between disparate phenomena often leads us down unexpected and intriguing paths. While it may seem nothing could be further apart than the thrilling world of football and the meticulous domain of survey research, our investigation into the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey unfurls a delightful tapestry of statistical curiosity.
As we embark upon this intellectual odyssey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy in our pursuit. The very notion of juxtaposing the prolific goal-scoring prowess of the esteemed Lukas Podolski with the scholarly endeavors of survey researchers may appear, at first glance, as preposterous as a soccer match played with a beach ball. However, as we dive deeper into the data, we are certain to uncover insights that are as unexpected as a goalkeeper scoring a hat-trick.
This study is not merely an exercise in academic jocularity. Rather, it represents a genuine effort to shed light on the uncanny confluence of athletic achievement and statistical rigor. While we approach this subject with the requisite seriousness befitting scholarly research, we also embrace the whimsical spirit that characterizes our quest.
As our exploration unfolds, we invite our readers to join us in a journey that is as enthralling as witnessing an underdog team triumph against all odds. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready to kick off this lighthearted yet thought-provoking foray into the surprising parallels between sports and research statistics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the perplexing yet fascinating link between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey, a multifaceted research approach was employed. Data collection involved an extensive trawl through the digital archives of Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with a sprinkle of algorithmic wizardry and a dash of statistical enchantment.

The first step in our methodological concoction was to employ a strategic blend of web scraping and manual data extraction techniques to unearth the goal-scoring exploits of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Every domestic match goal was meticulously tallied, cross-referenced, and lovingly caressed into a compendium of scoring magnificence.

Simultaneously, the Bureau of Labor Statistics was our trusty ally in the pursuit of survey researcher numbers in the enigmatic enclave of New Jersey. Through the mystical art of data querying and extensive spreadsheet incantations, we summoned forth the employment figures of these stalwart researchers, ready to embark on their statistical quests.

Having concocted a bubbling cauldron of data from 2004 to 2022, we then harnessed the powers of the Pearson correlation coefficient to scrutinize the relationship between Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the cadre of survey researchers diligently toiling in the Garden State. Additionally, a touch of regression analysis was sprinkled in for good measure, providing a tantalizing glimpse into the predictive potential of our findings.

Furthermore, in a stroke of methodological mirth, we conducted a series of humorous rituals to ensure the statistical validity of our results. These included the ancient rite of "Regressionism Leviosa" and the sacred incantation of "Pearson Correlation-o!" These rituals, while not explicitly detailed here for the sake of brevity, were integral to the robustness of our analysis.

Upon completion of our data dance and statistical soiree, we were able to present a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642, accompanied by a p-value smaller than the time it takes for a footballer to execute a perfect bicycle kick. These results, while born from a methodology steeped in whimsy, serve as a testament to the serious yet lighthearted nature of our exploration.

In the spirit of scholarly transparency, it must be noted that our methodology, while imbued with a soupçon of levity, adhered to the principled standards of empirical inquiry and statistical rigor. The resplendent fusion of data excavation, statistical sorcery, and a touch of academic exuberance formed the bedrock of our methodological journey, culminating in a harmonious union of sports fascination and research statistics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7526642, r-squared of 0.5665034, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of academic research, we often strive to uncover meaningful correlations, seeking to connect the seemingly unconnected. In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between the domestic match goal count of former footballer Lukas Podolski and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between sports and research statistics, demonstrating that sometimes the most unexpected connections can yield surprising results.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, the search for relationships between disparate phenomena often leads us down unexpected and intriguing paths. While it may seem nothing could be further apart than the thrilling world of football and the meticulous domain of survey research, our investigation into the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey unfurls a delightful tapestry of statistical curiosity.
As we embark upon this intellectual odyssey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy in our pursuit. The very notion of juxtaposing the prolific goal-scoring prowess of the esteemed Lukas Podolski with the scholarly endeavors of survey researchers may appear, at first glance, as preposterous as a soccer match played with a beach ball. However, as we dive deeper into the data, we are certain to uncover insights that are as unexpected as a goalkeeper scoring a hat-trick.
This study is not merely an exercise in academic jocularity. Rather, it represents a genuine effort to shed light on the uncanny confluence of athletic achievement and statistical rigor. While we approach this subject with the requisite seriousness befitting scholarly research, we also embrace the whimsical spirit that characterizes our quest.
As our exploration unfolds, we invite our readers to join us in a journey that is as enthralling as witnessing an underdog team triumph against all odds. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready to kick off this lighthearted yet thought-provoking foray into the surprising parallels between sports and research statistics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey revealed an unexpected yet remarkably robust correlation. For the time period spanning 2004 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.5665034 underscores the substantial proportion of the variance in survey researchers in New Jersey that can be explained by variations in Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count.

As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the compelling association between these two variables. The data points coalesce in a manner reminiscent of a perfectly executed set-piece play, with each goal scored by Podolski seemingly influencing the proliferation of survey researchers in the Garden State. One could even say that the relationship between these variables is as clear as the trajectory of a powerful free-kick.

The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, lends further credence to the strength of the observed correlation. It appears that the number of survey researchers in New Jersey has been intricately intertwined with the ebb and flow of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess throughout the past two decades, creating a fascinating narrative that defies conventional expectations.

In unraveling this enigmatic connection, we are reminded that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. The implications of our results extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, prompting us to reconsider the intricate interplay between athletic achievement and the pursuit of knowledge. While our investigation may appear to be a whimsical flight of fancy at first glance, it ultimately serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of research endeavors, offering a delightful reminder that even the most peculiar correlations can unveil intriguing insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of academic research, we often strive to uncover meaningful correlations, seeking to connect the seemingly unconnected. In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between the domestic match goal count of former footballer Lukas Podolski and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between sports and research statistics, demonstrating that sometimes the most unexpected connections can yield surprising results.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The quest to unravel the mysterious connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey is not without precedent. Smith et al. (2010) investigated the potential correlations between sports statistics and labor market trends, setting the stage for our own inquiry into this offbeat intersection. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) ventured into the uncharted territory of athlete achievements and research demographics, laying the groundwork for our exploration. However, their work lacks the definitive flair and comedic edge infused within our own study, which surely sets it apart.
In "Sports and Labor: A Statistical Perspective," the authors delve into the unexpected correlations between athletic achievements and labor market dynamics, but perhaps missed the delightful charm we bring to our investigation. Furthermore, "Demographics and Athletics: A Surprising Connection" offers a glimpse into the unexplored territory of sports and research, though they failed to capture the whimsical spirit that infuses our own scholarly endeavors.
Drawing inspiration from non-fiction works related to statistical analysis, we turn to "Freakonomics" for its unconventional examination of seemingly unrelated phenomena and "The Tipping Point" for its exploration of unexpected connections. On the other hand, the fiction genre offers us "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" as a playful nod to the unexpected insights that drive our investigation and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" as a lighthearted reminder that the most unlikely of pairings can lead to quite the adventure.
Further probing into the realm of whimsy, we find inspiration from board games such as Clue, where the search for connections leads to unexpected revelations, and Snakes and Ladders, where unpredictability reigns supreme – much like the nature of our correlation exploration.
In sum, while our pursuit may appear to be a departure from conventional academic inquiry, it is backed by a foundation of serious statistical analysis and a genuine desire to uncover the unexpected. With a nod to both the whimsical and the rigorous, we embark upon this journey with a hearty dose of curiosity and humor, eager to illuminate the unexplored links between the world of sports and the realm of research statistics.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey revealed an unexpected yet remarkably robust correlation. For the time period spanning 2004 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.5665034 underscores the substantial proportion of the variance in survey researchers in New Jersey that can be explained by variations in Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count.
As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the compelling association between these two variables. The data points coalesce in a manner reminiscent of a perfectly executed set-piece play, with each goal scored by Podolski seemingly influencing the proliferation of survey researchers in the Garden State. One could even say that the relationship between these variables is as clear as the trajectory of a powerful free-kick.
The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, lends further credence to the strength of the observed correlation. It appears that the number of survey researchers in New Jersey has been intricately intertwined with the ebb and flow of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess throughout the past two decades, creating a fascinating narrative that defies conventional expectations.
In unraveling this enigmatic connection, we are reminded that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. The implications of our results extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, prompting us to reconsider the intricate interplay between athletic achievement and the pursuit of knowledge. While our investigation may appear to be a whimsical flight of fancy at first glance, it ultimately serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of research endeavors, offering a delightful reminder that even the most peculiar correlations can unveil intriguing insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have shed light on the unexpected yet compelling correlation between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey, a connection that has captured the imagination of both sports enthusiasts and statistical aficionados. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and the strikingly low p-value provide empirical support for the notion that Podolski's on-field exploits have been intricately linked to the ebb and flow of survey researchers in the Garden State.

Drawing from the whimsical foundations of our literature review, we find ourselves marveling at the fortuitous nature of this correlation, akin to the serendipitous alignment of unexpected events in a game of Snakes and Ladders. While our pursuit may have been lighthearted in spirit, the statistical rigor underpinning our investigation ensures that our findings are not merely the stuff of playful fantasy.

Our results offer a validation of prior research, mirroring the earlier work of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), who ventured into the uncharted territory of unexpected correlations. The definitive flair and comedic edge infused within our study not only set it apart but also demonstrate the sheer delight in unraveling connections that defy conventional expectations. The blend of statistical analysis and genuine curiosity has culminated in an empirical confirmation of the lighthearted yet thought-provoking intersection between sports and research statistics.

The scatterplot, reminiscent of a carefully executed set-piece play, vividly illustrates the compelling association between Podolski's domestic match goal count and the proliferation of survey researchers in New Jersey. One cannot help but appreciate the narrative arc that has unfolded, where each goal scored by Podolski seemingly influences the proliferation of survey researchers, akin to the trajectory of a powerful free-kick.

In closing, our investigation underscores the substantial proportion of the variance in survey researchers in New Jersey that can be explained by variations in Podolski's goal-scoring prowess. It serves as a playful yet pertinent reminder that even the most peculiar correlations can unveil intriguing insights, making evident the delightful charm infused within our scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and The number of survey researchers in New Jersey. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of academic research, we often strive to uncover meaningful correlations, seeking to connect the seemingly unconnected. In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between the domestic match goal count of former footballer Lukas Podolski and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between sports and research statistics, demonstrating that sometimes the most unexpected connections can yield surprising results.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, the search for relationships between disparate phenomena often leads us down unexpected and intriguing paths. While it may seem nothing could be further apart than the thrilling world of football and the meticulous domain of survey research, our investigation into the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey unfurls a delightful tapestry of statistical curiosity.
As we embark upon this intellectual odyssey, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent whimsy in our pursuit. The very notion of juxtaposing the prolific goal-scoring prowess of the esteemed Lukas Podolski with the scholarly endeavors of survey researchers may appear, at first glance, as preposterous as a soccer match played with a beach ball. However, as we dive deeper into the data, we are certain to uncover insights that are as unexpected as a goalkeeper scoring a hat-trick.
This study is not merely an exercise in academic jocularity. Rather, it represents a genuine effort to shed light on the uncanny confluence of athletic achievement and statistical rigor. While we approach this subject with the requisite seriousness befitting scholarly research, we also embrace the whimsical spirit that characterizes our quest.
As our exploration unfolds, we invite our readers to join us in a journey that is as enthralling as witnessing an underdog team triumph against all odds. So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready to kick off this lighthearted yet thought-provoking foray into the surprising parallels between sports and research statistics.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the number of survey researchers in New Jersey revealed an unexpected yet remarkably robust correlation. For the time period spanning 2004 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.5665034 underscores the substantial proportion of the variance in survey researchers in New Jersey that can be explained by variations in Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count.
As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the compelling association between these two variables. The data points coalesce in a manner reminiscent of a perfectly executed set-piece play, with each goal scored by Podolski seemingly influencing the proliferation of survey researchers in the Garden State. One could even say that the relationship between these variables is as clear as the trajectory of a powerful free-kick.
The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, lends further credence to the strength of the observed correlation. It appears that the number of survey researchers in New Jersey has been intricately intertwined with the ebb and flow of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess throughout the past two decades, creating a fascinating narrative that defies conventional expectations.
In unraveling this enigmatic connection, we are reminded that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. The implications of our results extend beyond mere statistical curiosity, prompting us to reconsider the intricate interplay between athletic achievement and the pursuit of knowledge. While our investigation may appear to be a whimsical flight of fancy at first glance, it ultimately serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of research endeavors, offering a delightful reminder that even the most peculiar correlations can unveil intriguing insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In concluding this unique exploration, we are left pondering the enigmatic link between the stellar goal-scoring exploits of Lukas Podolski and the diligent endeavor of survey researchers in New Jersey. Our findings unveil a correlation that is as surprising as finding a goalie in the opponent's box during injury time.

The statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient and the r-squared value signifies a connection as solid as a well-constructed defense, a testament to the delightful unpredictability inherent in the realm of research.

As we reflect on the implications of our study, we are reminded that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction. This unexpected correlation offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking reminder that in the vast tapestry of statistics, even the most improbable connections can yield meaningful insights, much like a stoppage-time equalizer.

While our exploration may have begun as a lighthearted quest, it culminates in a recognition of the whimsical interplay that underlies our pursuit of knowledge. This study serves as a cheerful testament to the serendipitous nature of research, demonstrating that even the most unconventional correlations can spark valuable intellectual discourse.

In closing, we boldly assert that no further research is needed in this area. It is clear that the prolific feats of Lukas Podolski have indeed left an indelible imprint on the landscape of survey research in New Jersey, solidifying a correlation as inexplicable as a knuckleball shot. As we bid adieu to this captivating inquiry, we are left with a smile on our faces, a reminder that the world of academic research is as playful and delightfully capricious as a game of football in the park.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Social Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Sports Psychology and Behavioral Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Goal-scoring Goals: Exploring the Link Between Lukas Podolski's Domestic Match Goal Count and Survey Researchers in New Jersey with an abstract of In the world of academic research, we often strive to uncover meaningful correlations, seeking to connect the seemingly unconnected. In this paper, we delve into the curious relationship between the domestic match goal count of former footballer Lukas Podolski and the number of survey researchers in the state of New Jersey. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7526642 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking exploration of the intersection between sports and research statistics, demonstrating that sometimes the most unexpected connections can yield surprising results.

ChatGPT:

Lukas Podolski, domestic match goal count, survey researchers, New Jersey, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, sports statistics, unexpected connections, meaningful correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count

The number of survey researchers in New Jersey
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of survey researchers in New Jersey
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of survey researchers in New Jersey

Correlation r = 0.7526642 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5665034 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 56.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of survey researchers in New Jersey) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0002004. 0.0002004340134732208000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 0.02004% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,989 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.45, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count (Goals scored)10291271093141816124172275259
The number of survey researchers in New Jersey (Survey Researchers)51011809007206106304309801110860460520730700480430340350120




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10,29,12,7,10,9,3,14,18,16,12,4,17,22,7,5,2,5,9,])
array_2 = np.array([510,1180,900,720,610,630,430,980,1110,860,460,520,730,700,480,430,340,350,120,])
array_1_name = "Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count"
array_2_name = "The number of survey researchers in New Jersey"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2326 · Black Variable ID: 334 · Red Variable ID: 11541
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0