Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of Colettes in the world rose, so did the collective positive energy. This led to a spike in renewable energy production in Cabo Verde as the Colettes unknowingly became beacons of sustainable power. It's as if their very presence whispered the secrets of harnessing energy from natural sources, sparking a renewable revolution, proving that the true power of change Colette in the hands of the people!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic landscape in Cabo Verde where a group of sleek, towering wind turbines harness the powerful ocean breeze on a rocky hill. In the foreground, a group of smiling young girls, including the prominent figure of Colette, play joyfully amidst the coastal landscape, with the name Colette subtly integrated in the futuristic environment. The setting should evoke a sense of progress and harmony with nature, blending the modern technology of the wind turbines with the carefree laughter of the children. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Cute 2D animation Cyberpunk Charcoal Futuristic
ChatGPT: Futuristic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Cabo Verde, a group of wind turbines stands tall on a rocky hill, harnessing the strong ocean breeze. In the foreground, a smiling young girl named Colette plays with her friends, as her name continues to rise in popularity across the islands.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In Cabo Verde, a group of wind turbines stands tall on a rocky hill, harnessing the strong ocean breeze. In the foreground, a smiling young girl named Colette plays with her friends, as her name continues to rise in popularity across the islands. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic landscape in Cabo Verde where a group of sleek, towering wind turbines harness the powerful ocean breeze on a rocky hill. In the foreground, a group of smiling young girls, including the prominent figure of Colette, play joyfully amidst the coastal landscape, with the name Colette subtly integrated in the futuristic environment. The setting should evoke a sense of progress and harmony with nature, blending the modern technology of the wind turbines with the carefree laughter of the children.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Colette caused Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde The Journal of Renewable Nameology Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and p < 0.01 for 1993 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the sunny and windswept archipelago of Cabo Verde. By mining data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the esteemed Energy Information Administration, our research team has endeavored to shed light on this electrifying subject. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time span from 1993 to 2021, sparking a renewed interest in the energy dynamics related to nomenclature. Our findings cast a luminous spotlight on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, illuminating a hitherto unexplored facet of renewable energy research. With this electrifying revelation, we hope to inspire further investigation into the profound impact of names on the power generation landscape, and spark a fervor for puns in academic papers.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the sunny and windswept archipelago of Cabo Verde. By mining data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the esteemed Energy Information Administration, our research team has endeavored to shed light on this electrifying subject. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time span from 1993 to 2021, sparking a renewed interest in the energy dynamics related to nomenclature. Our findings cast a luminous spotlight on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, illuminating a hitherto unexplored facet of renewable energy research. With this electrifying revelation, we hope to inspire further investigation into the profound impact of names on the power generation landscape, and spark a fervor for puns in academic papers.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
**INTRODUCTION**
The correlation between the popularity of first names and various societal phenomena has been a subject of interest, amusement, and occasional incredulity among researchers and the general public alike. From the purported influence of names on career success to the alleged predisposition of individuals with certain names to exhibit certain behaviors, the realm of onomastics continues to intrigue scholars and laypersons alike. In the quest to unravel the mysteries of nomenclature, our study homes in on the curious relationship between the frequency of the name "Colette" and the production of renewable energy in the exotic locale of Cabo Verde.
Cabo Verde, an archipelago nestled in the azure waters of the Atlantic Ocean, boasts abundant sunshine and brisk winds, creating an ideal environment for the generation of renewable energy. The island nation has made noteworthy strides in harnessing its natural resources to bolster its energy production, garnering both admiration and accolades from the international community. Meanwhile, the name "Colette," with its origins in the French language, has seen its ebbs and flows in popularity over the years, evoking both nostalgia and curiosity among name enthusiasts and aficionados.
In this study, we endeavor to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the eponymous "Colette" and the vigor of renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Utilizing robust data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the respected Energy Information Administration, we embark on a journey to illuminate this dazzling confluence of nomenclature and energy dynamics. As we delve deeper into the web of statistics and correlations, we aim to shed light on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, while unabashedly reveling in the obscure charm of this unconventional scholarly pursuit.
The juxtaposition of a seemingly trivial aspect of human existence - one's given name - with the weighty matter of renewable energy production may strike some as whimsical or capricious. However, as we venture forth into the realm of apparently unrelated phenomena, we invite our esteemed colleagues to accompany us on this electrifying odyssey, laden with unexpected correlations and serendipitous revelations. Let us embark on this scholarly escapade with the same fervor with which we embrace the joy of a well-crafted pun - for in the world of academia, as in the world of names, surprises often abound, awaiting discovery by the discerning and the intrepid. With this spirit of curiosity and mirth, we present our findings on the astonishing connection between "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde, alight with the spark of discovery and the glow of unwavering inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the sunny and windswept archipelago of Cabo Verde. By mining data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the esteemed Energy Information Administration, our research team has endeavored to shed light on this electrifying subject. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time span from 1993 to 2021, sparking a renewed interest in the energy dynamics related to nomenclature. Our findings cast a luminous spotlight on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, illuminating a hitherto unexplored facet of renewable energy research. With this electrifying revelation, we hope to inspire further investigation into the profound impact of names on the power generation landscape, and spark a fervor for puns in academic papers.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between the popularity of first names and various societal phenomena has been a subject of interest, amusement, and occasional incredulity among researchers and the general public alike. From the purported influence of names on career success to the alleged predisposition of individuals with certain names to exhibit certain behaviors, the realm of onomastics continues to intrigue scholars and laypersons alike. In the quest to unravel the mysteries of nomenclature, our study homes in on the curious relationship between the frequency of the name "Colette" and the production of renewable energy in the exotic locale of Cabo Verde.
Cabo Verde, an archipelago nestled in the azure waters of the Atlantic Ocean, boasts abundant sunshine and brisk winds, creating an ideal environment for the generation of renewable energy. The island nation has made noteworthy strides in harnessing its natural resources to bolster its energy production, garnering both admiration and accolades from the international community. Meanwhile, the name "Colette," with its origins in the French language, has seen its ebbs and flows in popularity over the years, evoking both nostalgia and curiosity among name enthusiasts and aficionados.
In this study, we endeavor to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the eponymous "Colette" and the vigor of renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Utilizing robust data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the respected Energy Information Administration, we embark on a journey to illuminate this dazzling confluence of nomenclature and energy dynamics. As we delve deeper into the web of statistics and correlations, we aim to shed light on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, while unabashedly reveling in the obscure charm of this unconventional scholarly pursuit.
The juxtaposition of a seemingly trivial aspect of human existence - one's given name - with the weighty matter of renewable energy production may strike some as whimsical or capricious. However, as we venture forth into the realm of apparently unrelated phenomena, we invite our esteemed colleagues to accompany us on this electrifying odyssey, laden with unexpected correlations and serendipitous revelations. Let us embark on this scholarly escapade with the same fervor with which we embrace the joy of a well-crafted pun - for in the world of academia, as in the world of names, surprises often abound, awaiting discovery by the discerning and the intrepid. With this spirit of curiosity and mirth, we present our findings on the astonishing connection between "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde, alight with the spark of discovery and the glow of unwavering inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between personal nomenclature and various societal phenomena has been a subject of scholarly intrigue and occasional lighthearted speculation. As our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the frequency of the name "Colette" and the production of renewable energy in Cabo Verde, we find it imperative to examine existing literature relating to both name popularity and energy dynamics.
In "Smith et al.'s study," the authors explore the convergence of personal names and societal outcomes, proposing intriguing hypotheses regarding the potential influence of nomenclature on diverse aspects of human existence. However, our research uncovers a veritable Pandora's box of novel insights when we widen our scope to include unexpected parallels and remarkable associations.
In "Doe's research," the authors scrutinize the behavioral implications of personal names, instigating a discourse on the psychological and social ramifications of nomenclature. While the relevance of this study to our specific inquiry may seem tenuous at best, we acknowledge the inherent quirkiness of our exploration and embrace the intellectual frivolity inherent in our pursuit.
Transitioning from serious academic works to more offbeat sources, we sally forth to peruse "The Name Book" and "The Baby Name Wizard," delving into popular culture's fascination with names and their purported implications. These texts, replete with quirky anecdotes and whimsical name analyses, offer a lighthearted backdrop for our academic investigation, peppering our inquiry with a delightful dose of levity.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the timeless allure of "A Streetcar Named Desire" and the dystopian resonance of "Brave New World" lure us into a contemplative reverie on the power of names and their symbolic significance. While their direct relevance to our research may be nebulous, we cannot resist the allure of literary contemplation in the context of our electrifying study.
Our research also benefits from a spirited immersion into pop culture, with television shows such as "The Powerpuff Girls" and "The X-Files" sparking tangential musings on the uncanny and the inexplicable. As we whimsically mull over the potential influence of these shows on our scholarly pursuits, we are reminded of the idiosyncratic pathways of inquiry that often lead to the most unexpected of revelations.
In summary, the literature surrounding the intersection of personal nomenclature and societal dynamics offers a fascinating tapestry of insights, ranging from the scholarly to the eccentric, from the whimsical to the unexpected. As we embark on our electrifying exploration of the connection between the popularity of the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde, we do so with an irrepressible sense of levity and an unabashed zeal for uncovering the delightful nuances of academic inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1993 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the sunny and windswept archipelago of Cabo Verde. By mining data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the esteemed Energy Information Administration, our research team has endeavored to shed light on this electrifying subject. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time span from 1993 to 2021, sparking a renewed interest in the energy dynamics related to nomenclature. Our findings cast a luminous spotlight on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, illuminating a hitherto unexplored facet of renewable energy research. With this electrifying revelation, we hope to inspire further investigation into the profound impact of names on the power generation landscape, and spark a fervor for puns in academic papers.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between the popularity of first names and various societal phenomena has been a subject of interest, amusement, and occasional incredulity among researchers and the general public alike. From the purported influence of names on career success to the alleged predisposition of individuals with certain names to exhibit certain behaviors, the realm of onomastics continues to intrigue scholars and laypersons alike. In the quest to unravel the mysteries of nomenclature, our study homes in on the curious relationship between the frequency of the name "Colette" and the production of renewable energy in the exotic locale of Cabo Verde.
Cabo Verde, an archipelago nestled in the azure waters of the Atlantic Ocean, boasts abundant sunshine and brisk winds, creating an ideal environment for the generation of renewable energy. The island nation has made noteworthy strides in harnessing its natural resources to bolster its energy production, garnering both admiration and accolades from the international community. Meanwhile, the name "Colette," with its origins in the French language, has seen its ebbs and flows in popularity over the years, evoking both nostalgia and curiosity among name enthusiasts and aficionados.
In this study, we endeavor to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the eponymous "Colette" and the vigor of renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Utilizing robust data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the respected Energy Information Administration, we embark on a journey to illuminate this dazzling confluence of nomenclature and energy dynamics. As we delve deeper into the web of statistics and correlations, we aim to shed light on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, while unabashedly reveling in the obscure charm of this unconventional scholarly pursuit.
The juxtaposition of a seemingly trivial aspect of human existence - one's given name - with the weighty matter of renewable energy production may strike some as whimsical or capricious. However, as we venture forth into the realm of apparently unrelated phenomena, we invite our esteemed colleagues to accompany us on this electrifying odyssey, laden with unexpected correlations and serendipitous revelations. Let us embark on this scholarly escapade with the same fervor with which we embrace the joy of a well-crafted pun - for in the world of academia, as in the world of names, surprises often abound, awaiting discovery by the discerning and the intrepid. With this spirit of curiosity and mirth, we present our findings on the astonishing connection between "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde, alight with the spark of discovery and the glow of unwavering inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To bring to light the unexpected liaison between the appellation "Colette" and the production of renewable energy in Cabo Verde, a thorough and meticulous methodology was employed. The initial step encompassed accessing data on the nomenclature of "Colette" from the reputable US Social Security Administration, spanning the years 1993 to 2021. The frequency of occurrences of this inherently illuminating name was scrutinized with all the gravity and seriousness befitting a scholarly pursuit, in the quest for an elusively elusive connection to energy dynamics.
Simultaneously, data regarding renewable energy production in the resplendent archipelago of Cabo Verde was procured from the esteemed Energy Information Administration, ensuring the inclusion of a broad temporal and numerical scope in our quest for enlightenment. The statistical tools deployed were as robust and versatile as the renewable energy sources that Cabo Verde harnesses, as the research team employed correlation analysis and p-values to unravel the perplexing association between the moniker "Colette" and the sustainable production of energy in this captivating locale. Like a surfer harnessing the energy of the waves, our statistical rigor rode the crests and troughs of data, seeking patterns and relationships with a tenacity matched only by the Cabo Verdean trade winds.
Despite enchanting distractions posed by interesting baby name trends and the allure of renewable energy, the research team remained steadfast in its commitment to uncover the interplay of "Colette" and energy production. Leveraging the power of data analysis software so advanced it could even make a computer blush, the team labored with precision and diligence, undeterred by the siren call of frivolity on the high seas of internet research.
In summary, the methodology adopted in this investigation amalgamated data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, birthing a comprehensive and panoramic perspective on the connection between the name "Colette" and the generation of renewable energy in Cabo Verde. This ardent pursuit of knowledge carried with it a resounding dedication to the pursuit of truth, albeit tinged with an irrepressible tendency to unearth unexpected and amusing correlations.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1993 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9678953, r-squared of 0.9368212, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the sunny and windswept archipelago of Cabo Verde. By mining data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the esteemed Energy Information Administration, our research team has endeavored to shed light on this electrifying subject. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time span from 1993 to 2021, sparking a renewed interest in the energy dynamics related to nomenclature. Our findings cast a luminous spotlight on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, illuminating a hitherto unexplored facet of renewable energy research. With this electrifying revelation, we hope to inspire further investigation into the profound impact of names on the power generation landscape, and spark a fervor for puns in academic papers.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The correlation between the popularity of first names and various societal phenomena has been a subject of interest, amusement, and occasional incredulity among researchers and the general public alike. From the purported influence of names on career success to the alleged predisposition of individuals with certain names to exhibit certain behaviors, the realm of onomastics continues to intrigue scholars and laypersons alike. In the quest to unravel the mysteries of nomenclature, our study homes in on the curious relationship between the frequency of the name "Colette" and the production of renewable energy in the exotic locale of Cabo Verde.
Cabo Verde, an archipelago nestled in the azure waters of the Atlantic Ocean, boasts abundant sunshine and brisk winds, creating an ideal environment for the generation of renewable energy. The island nation has made noteworthy strides in harnessing its natural resources to bolster its energy production, garnering both admiration and accolades from the international community. Meanwhile, the name "Colette," with its origins in the French language, has seen its ebbs and flows in popularity over the years, evoking both nostalgia and curiosity among name enthusiasts and aficionados.
In this study, we endeavor to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the eponymous "Colette" and the vigor of renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Utilizing robust data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the respected Energy Information Administration, we embark on a journey to illuminate this dazzling confluence of nomenclature and energy dynamics. As we delve deeper into the web of statistics and correlations, we aim to shed light on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, while unabashedly reveling in the obscure charm of this unconventional scholarly pursuit.
The juxtaposition of a seemingly trivial aspect of human existence - one's given name - with the weighty matter of renewable energy production may strike some as whimsical or capricious. However, as we venture forth into the realm of apparently unrelated phenomena, we invite our esteemed colleagues to accompany us on this electrifying odyssey, laden with unexpected correlations and serendipitous revelations. Let us embark on this scholarly escapade with the same fervor with which we embrace the joy of a well-crafted pun - for in the world of academia, as in the world of names, surprises often abound, awaiting discovery by the discerning and the intrepid. With this spirit of curiosity and mirth, we present our findings on the astonishing connection between "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde, alight with the spark of discovery and the glow of unwavering inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9678953, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This finding is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9368212, signifying that approximately 93.68% of the variation in renewable energy production can be explained by the popularity of the name "Colette." The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. The data points are densely clustered around a linear trend line, exemplifying the striking association between these seemingly disparate elements. It appears that as the popularity of the name "Colette" fluctuates over time, there is a corresponding pattern in the production of renewable energy in this sun-drenched archipelago.
These findings prompt contemplation of the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. While the methodology employed in this study does not permit us to infer causation, it nevertheless beckons us to consider the profound impact of personal nomenclature on societal and environmental dynamics. The symbiotic dance between the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde serves as a vivid testament to the enigmatic interplay of human behavior, cultural phenomena, and natural resources.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of this endeavor, our results carry implications that transcend the boundaries of nomenclature and energy production. They invite scholars to engage in a broader discourse on the myriad influences shaping our world, including those that lurk beneath the surface of everyday observation. With this revelatory study, we aim to illuminate the unexplored corridors of interdisciplinary inquiry and beckon fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the tapestry of seemingly unrelated phenomena. For as we have discovered, beneath the veneer of the ordinary lies a trove of unsuspected connections, waiting to be unearthed by the inquisitive and the open-minded.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the sunny and windswept archipelago of Cabo Verde. By mining data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the esteemed Energy Information Administration, our research team has endeavored to shed light on this electrifying subject. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time span from 1993 to 2021, sparking a renewed interest in the energy dynamics related to nomenclature. Our findings cast a luminous spotlight on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, illuminating a hitherto unexplored facet of renewable energy research. With this electrifying revelation, we hope to inspire further investigation into the profound impact of names on the power generation landscape, and spark a fervor for puns in academic papers.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between personal nomenclature and various societal phenomena has been a subject of scholarly intrigue and occasional lighthearted speculation. As our study delves into the enigmatic correlation between the frequency of the name "Colette" and the production of renewable energy in Cabo Verde, we find it imperative to examine existing literature relating to both name popularity and energy dynamics.
In "Smith et al.'s study," the authors explore the convergence of personal names and societal outcomes, proposing intriguing hypotheses regarding the potential influence of nomenclature on diverse aspects of human existence. However, our research uncovers a veritable Pandora's box of novel insights when we widen our scope to include unexpected parallels and remarkable associations.
In "Doe's research," the authors scrutinize the behavioral implications of personal names, instigating a discourse on the psychological and social ramifications of nomenclature. While the relevance of this study to our specific inquiry may seem tenuous at best, we acknowledge the inherent quirkiness of our exploration and embrace the intellectual frivolity inherent in our pursuit.
Transitioning from serious academic works to more offbeat sources, we sally forth to peruse "The Name Book" and "The Baby Name Wizard," delving into popular culture's fascination with names and their purported implications. These texts, replete with quirky anecdotes and whimsical name analyses, offer a lighthearted backdrop for our academic investigation, peppering our inquiry with a delightful dose of levity.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the timeless allure of "A Streetcar Named Desire" and the dystopian resonance of "Brave New World" lure us into a contemplative reverie on the power of names and their symbolic significance. While their direct relevance to our research may be nebulous, we cannot resist the allure of literary contemplation in the context of our electrifying study.
Our research also benefits from a spirited immersion into pop culture, with television shows such as "The Powerpuff Girls" and "The X-Files" sparking tangential musings on the uncanny and the inexplicable. As we whimsically mull over the potential influence of these shows on our scholarly pursuits, we are reminded of the idiosyncratic pathways of inquiry that often lead to the most unexpected of revelations.
In summary, the literature surrounding the intersection of personal nomenclature and societal dynamics offers a fascinating tapestry of insights, ranging from the scholarly to the eccentric, from the whimsical to the unexpected. As we embark on our electrifying exploration of the connection between the popularity of the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde, we do so with an irrepressible sense of levity and an unabashed zeal for uncovering the delightful nuances of academic inquiry.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9678953, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This finding is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9368212, signifying that approximately 93.68% of the variation in renewable energy production can be explained by the popularity of the name "Colette." The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. The data points are densely clustered around a linear trend line, exemplifying the striking association between these seemingly disparate elements. It appears that as the popularity of the name "Colette" fluctuates over time, there is a corresponding pattern in the production of renewable energy in this sun-drenched archipelago.
These findings prompt contemplation of the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. While the methodology employed in this study does not permit us to infer causation, it nevertheless beckons us to consider the profound impact of personal nomenclature on societal and environmental dynamics. The symbiotic dance between the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde serves as a vivid testament to the enigmatic interplay of human behavior, cultural phenomena, and natural resources.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of this endeavor, our results carry implications that transcend the boundaries of nomenclature and energy production. They invite scholars to engage in a broader discourse on the myriad influences shaping our world, including those that lurk beneath the surface of everyday observation. With this revelatory study, we aim to illuminate the unexplored corridors of interdisciplinary inquiry and beckon fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the tapestry of seemingly unrelated phenomena. For as we have discovered, beneath the veneer of the ordinary lies a trove of unsuspected connections, waiting to be unearthed by the inquisitive and the open-minded.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this study not only illuminate a captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde but also beckon us to consider the profound implications of this seemingly whimsical association. Our results align with and extend the existing literature, demonstrating an unexpected synergy between personal nomenclature and societal dynamics.
Smith et al.'s exploration of the convergence of personal names and societal outcomes pales in comparison to the exuberant dance we have uncovered between the name "Colette" and renewable energy production. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value support our contention that there is more to nomenclature than meets the eye. In a similar vein, "Doe's research" on the psychological and social ramifications of nomenclature merely scratches the surface of the captivating interplay between names and societal phenomena, compared to the electrifying revelation of a 93.68% variation in renewable energy production explained by the popularity of the name "Colette."
The scatterplot displaying the striking association between the frequency of the name "Colette" and renewable energy production offers a visual testament to the resounding impact of personal nomenclature on the energy landscape. While our methodology precludes us from inferring causation, the conspicuous correlation prompts spirited contemplation of the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. Could it be that the name "Colette" possesses an unspoken alchemical afflatus that propels the generation of renewable energy in the sun-drenched confines of Cabo Verde?
As we mull over the implications of our findings, we are reminded of the delightful whimsy that suffuses the intersection of personal nomenclature and environmental dynamics. Our results prompt scholars to delve into a broader discourse on the multifaceted influences that shape our world, transcending the boundaries of traditional academic inquiry. As we strive to unravel the tapestry of seemingly unrelated phenomena, we are imbued with a fervent desire to inspire fellow researchers to embrace the idiosyncratic pathways of inquiry that may lead to the most unexpected of revelations—and perhaps even an electrifying spark of inspiration.
In unraveling the enigmatic connection between the popularity of the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde, our study stands as a luminous beacon of interdisciplinary inquiry, inviting researchers to embrace the surprises and serendipities that characterize the pulsating heart of academic exploration. For as we have discovered, there is an impressive depth of insight waiting to be unearthed by the inquisitive and the open-minded, hidden within the mundane and the extraordinary alike.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Colette and Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious correlation between the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the sunny and windswept archipelago of Cabo Verde. By mining data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the esteemed Energy Information Administration, our research team has endeavored to shed light on this electrifying subject. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time span from 1993 to 2021, sparking a renewed interest in the energy dynamics related to nomenclature. Our findings cast a luminous spotlight on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, illuminating a hitherto unexplored facet of renewable energy research. With this electrifying revelation, we hope to inspire further investigation into the profound impact of names on the power generation landscape, and spark a fervor for puns in academic papers.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The correlation between the popularity of first names and various societal phenomena has been a subject of interest, amusement, and occasional incredulity among researchers and the general public alike. From the purported influence of names on career success to the alleged predisposition of individuals with certain names to exhibit certain behaviors, the realm of onomastics continues to intrigue scholars and laypersons alike. In the quest to unravel the mysteries of nomenclature, our study homes in on the curious relationship between the frequency of the name "Colette" and the production of renewable energy in the exotic locale of Cabo Verde.
Cabo Verde, an archipelago nestled in the azure waters of the Atlantic Ocean, boasts abundant sunshine and brisk winds, creating an ideal environment for the generation of renewable energy. The island nation has made noteworthy strides in harnessing its natural resources to bolster its energy production, garnering both admiration and accolades from the international community. Meanwhile, the name "Colette," with its origins in the French language, has seen its ebbs and flows in popularity over the years, evoking both nostalgia and curiosity among name enthusiasts and aficionados.
In this study, we endeavor to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the eponymous "Colette" and the vigor of renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. Utilizing robust data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the respected Energy Information Administration, we embark on a journey to illuminate this dazzling confluence of nomenclature and energy dynamics. As we delve deeper into the web of statistics and correlations, we aim to shed light on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, while unabashedly reveling in the obscure charm of this unconventional scholarly pursuit.
The juxtaposition of a seemingly trivial aspect of human existence - one's given name - with the weighty matter of renewable energy production may strike some as whimsical or capricious. However, as we venture forth into the realm of apparently unrelated phenomena, we invite our esteemed colleagues to accompany us on this electrifying odyssey, laden with unexpected correlations and serendipitous revelations. Let us embark on this scholarly escapade with the same fervor with which we embrace the joy of a well-crafted pun - for in the world of academia, as in the world of names, surprises often abound, awaiting discovery by the discerning and the intrepid. With this spirit of curiosity and mirth, we present our findings on the astonishing connection between "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde, alight with the spark of discovery and the glow of unwavering inquiry.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde yielded a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9678953, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This finding is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9368212, signifying that approximately 93.68% of the variation in renewable energy production can be explained by the popularity of the name "Colette." The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the frequency of the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde. The data points are densely clustered around a linear trend line, exemplifying the striking association between these seemingly disparate elements. It appears that as the popularity of the name "Colette" fluctuates over time, there is a corresponding pattern in the production of renewable energy in this sun-drenched archipelago.
These findings prompt contemplation of the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. While the methodology employed in this study does not permit us to infer causation, it nevertheless beckons us to consider the profound impact of personal nomenclature on societal and environmental dynamics. The symbiotic dance between the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in Cabo Verde serves as a vivid testament to the enigmatic interplay of human behavior, cultural phenomena, and natural resources.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of this endeavor, our results carry implications that transcend the boundaries of nomenclature and energy production. They invite scholars to engage in a broader discourse on the myriad influences shaping our world, including those that lurk beneath the surface of everyday observation. With this revelatory study, we aim to illuminate the unexplored corridors of interdisciplinary inquiry and beckon fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the tapestry of seemingly unrelated phenomena. For as we have discovered, beneath the veneer of the ordinary lies a trove of unsuspected connections, waiting to be unearthed by the inquisitive and the open-minded.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, the correlation between the popularity of the name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the picturesque setting of Cabo Verde has revealed an unexpectedly robust relationship. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01, highlight the intriguing interplay between personal nomenclature and the generation of sustainable energy resources. The scatterplot in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the synchronous dance between the eponymous name and the renewable energy output, offering a visual representation of this electrifying connection.
While some may find the juxtaposition of a name's popularity and energy production as whimsical, the statistical evidence substantiates this remarkable correlation. Our results beckon further exploration into the arcane influences that shape our world, expanding the discourse on the unforeseen connections that underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena. As we reflect on the luminous implications of our study, we are reminded that the realm of academia, much like a well-crafted pun, is rife with unexpected twists and revelatory insights waiting to be unearthed by the discerning and the adventurous.
In light of these electrifying revelations, it is our fervent hope that this study ignites a fervor for interdisciplinary inquiry, stimulating a merry pursuit of offbeat connections and unexpected correlations. As for the profound impact of personal nomenclature on the realm of renewable energy production, we assert that no further research is needed in this area – after all, some connections are simply too shocking to require further validation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Renewable Nameology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Quirky Research Advancement and Investigation (SQRAI)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde with an abstract of This study delves into the curious correlation between the frequency of the first name "Colette" and renewable energy production in the sunny and windswept archipelago of Cabo Verde. By mining data from the esteemed US Social Security Administration and the esteemed Energy Information Administration, our research team has endeavored to shed light on this electrifying subject. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9678953 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time span from 1993 to 2021, sparking a renewed interest in the energy dynamics related to nomenclature. Our findings cast a luminous spotlight on the potential influence of personal nomenclature on the development of sustainable energy resources, illuminating a hitherto unexplored facet of renewable energy research. With this electrifying revelation, we hope to inspire further investigation into the profound impact of names on the power generation landscape, and spark a fervor for puns in academic papers.
ChatGPT:
Colette, renewable energy, Cabo Verde, correlation, statistical analysis, renewable energy production, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, sustainable energy resources, power generation, names, puns
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name ColetteDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Colette
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Colette
Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde
Detailed data title: Total renewable energy production in Cabo Verde in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9368212 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Colette) over the 29 years from 1993 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.007E-17. 0.0000000000000000100719855131
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 1.007E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 99,285,289,747,424,944 random variables You don't actually need 99 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 28 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 28 because we have two variables measured over a period of 29 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.93, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Popularity of the first name Colette (Babies born) | 134 | 134 | 166 | 159 | 142 | 121 | 179 | 182 | 182 | 151 | 135 | 154 | 150 | 161 | 152 | 190 | 208 | 208 | 240 | 426 | 458 | 590 | 597 | 675 | 584 | 587 | 628 | 568 | 686 |
Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde (Billion kWh) | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.004 | 0.025 | 0.071 | 0.083 | 0.09 | 0.085 | 0.083 | 0.075 | 0.089 | 0.083 | 0.073 | 0.073 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([134,134,166,159,142,121,179,182,182,151,135,154,150,161,152,190,208,208,240,426,458,590,597,675,584,587,628,568,686,])
array_2 = np.array([0.002,0.005,0.006,0.007,0.007,0.008,0.008,0.008,0.006,0.006,0.005,0.006,0.006,0.007,0.007,0.006,0.007,0.004,0.025,0.071,0.083,0.09,0.085,0.083,0.075,0.089,0.083,0.073,0.073,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Colette"
array_2_name = "Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Colette
- Line chart for only Renewable energy production in Cabo Verde
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Electrifying Colette: Exploring the Shocking Link between the Popularity of the Name and Renewable Energy Production in Cabo Verde
Your rating skills are legendary!
Correlation ID: 2311 · Black Variable ID: 3955 · Red Variable ID: 23567