Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the gravitational tug-of-war between the distant planets intensified, it inadvertently boosted the productivity of Brazilian nuclear reactors. This celestial rearrangement led to a cosmic surge in energy output, proving once and for all that when it comes to Uranus, even the smallest space can make a big impact on Earth.
Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that appears to be a scene from a Disney movie, showing a wide, majestic landscape with the planets Uranus and Saturn shining brightly in the sky. The landscape is dotted with sleek and modern nuclear power plants, which are generating energy for the surrounding area. Capture the ethereal beauty of the celestial bodies while emphasizing the futuristic and efficient energy production facilities below. The image should evoke a sense of wonder and harmony in this otherworldly setting, as if it were a scene from a Disney movie. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Glitch art Woodblock painting An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling landscape, there is a wide expanse between Uranus and Saturn, with each planet shining brightly in the sky. On the same land, there are sleek and modern nuclear power plants dotted throughout, generating energy for the surrounding area.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling landscape, there is a wide expanse between Uranus and Saturn, with each planet shining brightly in the sky. On the same land, there are sleek and modern nuclear power plants dotted throughout, generating energy for the surrounding area. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that appears to be a scene from a Disney movie, showing a wide, majestic landscape with the planets Uranus and Saturn shining brightly in the sky. The landscape is dotted with sleek and modern nuclear power plants, which are generating energy for the surrounding area. Capture the ethereal beauty of the celestial bodies while emphasizing the futuristic and efficient energy production facilities below. The image should evoke a sense of wonder and harmony in this otherworldly setting, as if it were a scene from a Disney movie.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The distance between Uranus and Saturn caused Nuclear power generation in Brazil to increase.
AI academic paper
 |
The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil The Journal of Celestial Energy and Geopolitics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from Caclculated using Astropy and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9108140 and p < 0.01 for 1982 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study boldly goes where no research has gone before, as we investigate the possibly cosmic correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. Utilizing data from Astropy and the Energy Information Administration, our research team performed a comprehensive analysis from 1982 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strikingly significant correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, with p < 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship between the celestial distances and nuclear energy production. While the idea of planetary positions driving nuclear power output may seem as improbable as finding a star-shaped watermelon, our research underscores the potential impact of cosmic forces on earthly energy sources. Prepare to be astounded by the unexpected interplay between distant planets and earthly power plants!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study boldly goes where no research has gone before, as we investigate the possibly cosmic correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. Utilizing data from Astropy and the Energy Information Administration, our research team performed a comprehensive analysis from 1982 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strikingly significant correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, with p < 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship between the celestial distances and nuclear energy production. While the idea of planetary positions driving nuclear power output may seem as improbable as finding a star-shaped watermelon, our research underscores the potential impact of cosmic forces on earthly energy sources. Prepare to be astounded by the unexpected interplay between distant planets and earthly power plants!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of astronomy and energy production may sound like a far-fetched plotline for a science fiction novel, but our research delves into this cosmic connection with utmost seriousness and a dash of astronomical awe. The alignment of the planets in our solar system has long been a source of fascination and speculation, often inspiring both scientific inquiry and celestial superstitions. Amidst this celestial ballet, the distance between Uranus and Saturn emerges as the unlikely protagonist in our investigation, as we explore its potential influence on nuclear power generation in the earthly confines of Brazil.
While it may be tempting to dismiss such a notion as mere astrological hocus pocus, the allure of uncovering unexpected relationships in data cannot be underestimated. Our research aims to shine a scientific spotlight on this serendipitous correlation and elucidate the mysteries of its cosmic underpinnings. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a cosmic curiosity akin to stargazing on a clear night, we aim to unravel the celestial clues that may impact the earthly realm of nuclear energy production in Brazil.
In this paper, we will present the results of our investigation, which stands at the crossroads of celestial mechanics and energy economics. Brace yourselves for an academic odyssey that navigates the cosmic expanse to illuminate the nuanced relationship between the planetary positions and the nuclear power output in Brazil. As we venture forth into this uncharted territory, we invite you to don your metaphorical astronaut suits and embark on a journey that promises both scientific insights and a sprinkle of cosmic whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study boldly goes where no research has gone before, as we investigate the possibly cosmic correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. Utilizing data from Astropy and the Energy Information Administration, our research team performed a comprehensive analysis from 1982 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strikingly significant correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, with p < 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship between the celestial distances and nuclear energy production. While the idea of planetary positions driving nuclear power output may seem as improbable as finding a star-shaped watermelon, our research underscores the potential impact of cosmic forces on earthly energy sources. Prepare to be astounded by the unexpected interplay between distant planets and earthly power plants!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of astronomy and energy production may sound like a far-fetched plotline for a science fiction novel, but our research delves into this cosmic connection with utmost seriousness and a dash of astronomical awe. The alignment of the planets in our solar system has long been a source of fascination and speculation, often inspiring both scientific inquiry and celestial superstitions. Amidst this celestial ballet, the distance between Uranus and Saturn emerges as the unlikely protagonist in our investigation, as we explore its potential influence on nuclear power generation in the earthly confines of Brazil.
While it may be tempting to dismiss such a notion as mere astrological hocus pocus, the allure of uncovering unexpected relationships in data cannot be underestimated. Our research aims to shine a scientific spotlight on this serendipitous correlation and elucidate the mysteries of its cosmic underpinnings. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a cosmic curiosity akin to stargazing on a clear night, we aim to unravel the celestial clues that may impact the earthly realm of nuclear energy production in Brazil.
In this paper, we will present the results of our investigation, which stands at the crossroads of celestial mechanics and energy economics. Brace yourselves for an academic odyssey that navigates the cosmic expanse to illuminate the nuanced relationship between the planetary positions and the nuclear power output in Brazil. As we venture forth into this uncharted territory, we invite you to don your metaphorical astronaut suits and embark on a journey that promises both scientific insights and a sprinkle of cosmic whimsy.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The empirical examination of the relationship between celestial dynamics and earthly energy production may seem extraterrestrial in nature, yet our foray into this novel domain is enriched by a melange of astrophysical inquiry, statistical scrutiny, and perhaps a touch of cosmic serendipity. To our initial surprise and eventual intrigue, this terrain has not evoked as much scholarly exploration as one might expect. Nonetheless, as we aim to navigate this uncharted celestial expanse, we embark on a brief expedition through the existing corpus of literature that meanders through the realms of planetary positioning, nuclear energetics, and the unsuspecting fusion of the two.
Smith, Doe, and Jones (2015) introduce the concept of "Celestial Coordination and Terrestrial Technologies," advocating for the consideration of cosmic phenomena in the realm of energy production. Conversely, "Astrology for Astrophysicists" by Starry McStellar (2013) provides a cosmic perspective on energy generation, albeit in a rather non-scientific manner.
Venturing into the realm of fiction that may yet hold nuggets of cosmic truth, we encounter Asimov's "Foundation" series, where the interplay of cosmic forces has far-reaching implications on societal metamorphoses. On a more down-to-earth note, H.G. Wells' "The War of the Worlds" portrays an energy-hungry species amid planetary alignments that culminate in intergalactic havoc.
In a twist of cosmic irony, a social media post from @SpaceGeekGalaxy on Twitter waggishly pondered, "If Uranus winks at Saturn and Brazil's nuclear power plants hum in unison, is that the cosmos orchestrating a celestial concert or just sheer coincidence? #CosmicConnections #NuclearMysteries"
In this cosmic quest for insight, we acknowledge the diversity of sources that both inform and engage our exploration of the Ur-anus-Saturn distance and nuclear power generation in Brazil. As our inquiry progresses, it is our hope that the discourse surrounding the cosmic nexus of planetary dynamics and earthly energy may take on a cosmic-erratic, yet scientifically enriched, trajectory.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1982 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study boldly goes where no research has gone before, as we investigate the possibly cosmic correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. Utilizing data from Astropy and the Energy Information Administration, our research team performed a comprehensive analysis from 1982 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strikingly significant correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, with p < 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship between the celestial distances and nuclear energy production. While the idea of planetary positions driving nuclear power output may seem as improbable as finding a star-shaped watermelon, our research underscores the potential impact of cosmic forces on earthly energy sources. Prepare to be astounded by the unexpected interplay between distant planets and earthly power plants!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of astronomy and energy production may sound like a far-fetched plotline for a science fiction novel, but our research delves into this cosmic connection with utmost seriousness and a dash of astronomical awe. The alignment of the planets in our solar system has long been a source of fascination and speculation, often inspiring both scientific inquiry and celestial superstitions. Amidst this celestial ballet, the distance between Uranus and Saturn emerges as the unlikely protagonist in our investigation, as we explore its potential influence on nuclear power generation in the earthly confines of Brazil.
While it may be tempting to dismiss such a notion as mere astrological hocus pocus, the allure of uncovering unexpected relationships in data cannot be underestimated. Our research aims to shine a scientific spotlight on this serendipitous correlation and elucidate the mysteries of its cosmic underpinnings. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a cosmic curiosity akin to stargazing on a clear night, we aim to unravel the celestial clues that may impact the earthly realm of nuclear energy production in Brazil.
In this paper, we will present the results of our investigation, which stands at the crossroads of celestial mechanics and energy economics. Brace yourselves for an academic odyssey that navigates the cosmic expanse to illuminate the nuanced relationship between the planetary positions and the nuclear power output in Brazil. As we venture forth into this uncharted territory, we invite you to don your metaphorical astronaut suits and embark on a journey that promises both scientific insights and a sprinkle of cosmic whimsy.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In this study, we employed a multidimensional approach to unravel the enigmatic connection between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and the production of nuclear energy in Brazil. The data collection process resembled a cosmic scavenger hunt, with our research team traversing the digital realm to gather relevant information from 1982 to 2021. While the idea of celestial bodies influencing earthly energy sources may sound like a plot twist from a science fiction movie, our methodology was firmly rooted in statistical analysis and scientific rigor.
To determine the celestial distance, we turned to the celestial powerhouse of Astropy, which provided precise calculations of the Uranus-Saturn distance at various points in time. This celestial data formed the backbone of our investigation, allowing us to track the fluctuations in planetary positioning with the precision of a cosmic detective.
On the earthly front, the Energy Information Administration served as our trusty guide through the labyrinth of nuclear power generation in Brazil. The agency's comprehensive datasets became our treasure trove of information, shedding light on the ebb and flow of nuclear energy production over the years. We meticulously curated these datasets, ensuring that our analysis encompassed a substantial time span to capture the nuanced interplay between celestial configurations and earthly energy dynamics.
With our celestial and terrestrial datasets in hand, we embarked on a statistical odyssey to unveil the potential correlation between the distant dance of planets and the nuclear energy output in Brazil. Employing advanced statistical methods, including correlation analysis and regression modeling, we navigated through the cosmic expanse of data points to discern any meaningful relationships.
The cornerstone of our analysis lay in calculating the correlation coefficient between the Uranus-Saturn distance and nuclear energy generation, akin to seeking cosmic harmony in a cacophony of data. Furthermore, we conducted regression analyses to explore the predictive power of celestial distances on nuclear power production, akin to attempting to decipher the celestial symphony that might influence earthly energy dynamics.
To ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected our models to rigorous validation tests, akin to verifying the cosmic alignments through the lens of statistical scrutiny. The utilization of statistical software for data manipulation, such as Python and R, facilitated the orchestration of our analyses, allowing us to untangle the cosmic and earthly threads with computational finesse.
Throughout our methodological odyssey, we remained vigilant against the onset of statistical mirages and cosmic illusions, steering our analytical ship through the celestial and terrestrial currents with the utmost precision and intellectual curiosity.
In conclusion, our research methodology epitomized a seamless fusion of celestial calculations, terrestrial data mining, and statistical wizardry, sculpting a rigorous framework to shed light on the elusive interplay between planetary distances and nuclear energy generation in Brazil. So, sit back, fasten your scientific seatbelt, and prepare to embark on a cosmic statistical journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is whimsical.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1982 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9108140, r-squared of 0.8295822, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study boldly goes where no research has gone before, as we investigate the possibly cosmic correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. Utilizing data from Astropy and the Energy Information Administration, our research team performed a comprehensive analysis from 1982 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strikingly significant correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, with p < 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship between the celestial distances and nuclear energy production. While the idea of planetary positions driving nuclear power output may seem as improbable as finding a star-shaped watermelon, our research underscores the potential impact of cosmic forces on earthly energy sources. Prepare to be astounded by the unexpected interplay between distant planets and earthly power plants!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of astronomy and energy production may sound like a far-fetched plotline for a science fiction novel, but our research delves into this cosmic connection with utmost seriousness and a dash of astronomical awe. The alignment of the planets in our solar system has long been a source of fascination and speculation, often inspiring both scientific inquiry and celestial superstitions. Amidst this celestial ballet, the distance between Uranus and Saturn emerges as the unlikely protagonist in our investigation, as we explore its potential influence on nuclear power generation in the earthly confines of Brazil.
While it may be tempting to dismiss such a notion as mere astrological hocus pocus, the allure of uncovering unexpected relationships in data cannot be underestimated. Our research aims to shine a scientific spotlight on this serendipitous correlation and elucidate the mysteries of its cosmic underpinnings. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a cosmic curiosity akin to stargazing on a clear night, we aim to unravel the celestial clues that may impact the earthly realm of nuclear energy production in Brazil.
In this paper, we will present the results of our investigation, which stands at the crossroads of celestial mechanics and energy economics. Brace yourselves for an academic odyssey that navigates the cosmic expanse to illuminate the nuanced relationship between the planetary positions and the nuclear power output in Brazil. As we venture forth into this uncharted territory, we invite you to don your metaphorical astronaut suits and embark on a journey that promises both scientific insights and a sprinkle of cosmic whimsy.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil revealed a remarkably robust correlation. Over the time period from 1982 to 2021, the correlation coefficient between these seemingly disparate variables was calculated to be 0.9108140, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8295822. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this cosmic correlation.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the strong relationship between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. The unmistakably upward trend in the plot serves as a visual testament to the surprising association that emerged from our rigorous statistical analysis.
It is worth noting that while the correlation between celestial distances and nuclear power generation may at first seem as far-fetched as a rocket-powered unicorn, our findings speak to the unanticipated potential impact of cosmic configurations on energy production here on Earth. Whether one is a staunch believer in the gravitational influences of celestial bodies or a skeptic who prefers to keep their feet firmly planted on the ground, our results open the door to a cosmically charged dialogue on the complex interplay between the celestial and the terrestrial.
The findings from our study not only pique scientific curiosity but also bear implications for energy economists and policymakers. While we may not yet be ready to incorporate planetary positions into energy production forecasts, our research underscores the need to remain open to unexpected influences that may shape our understanding of energy systems and their dynamics. As the cosmic dance of planets unfolds, it appears that their movements may hold more sway over our earthly endeavors than previously imagined.
Overall, our results urge a reconsideration of the notion that the celestial and the terrestrial inhabit entirely separate spheres. The potential cosmic connection to earthly energy sources introduces an intriguing layer of complexity to our understanding of energy production. We invite readers to embrace this cosmic curiosity with the same blend of academic rigor and whimsical wonder that guided our own research journey.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study boldly goes where no research has gone before, as we investigate the possibly cosmic correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. Utilizing data from Astropy and the Energy Information Administration, our research team performed a comprehensive analysis from 1982 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strikingly significant correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, with p < 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship between the celestial distances and nuclear energy production. While the idea of planetary positions driving nuclear power output may seem as improbable as finding a star-shaped watermelon, our research underscores the potential impact of cosmic forces on earthly energy sources. Prepare to be astounded by the unexpected interplay between distant planets and earthly power plants!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The empirical examination of the relationship between celestial dynamics and earthly energy production may seem extraterrestrial in nature, yet our foray into this novel domain is enriched by a melange of astrophysical inquiry, statistical scrutiny, and perhaps a touch of cosmic serendipity. To our initial surprise and eventual intrigue, this terrain has not evoked as much scholarly exploration as one might expect. Nonetheless, as we aim to navigate this uncharted celestial expanse, we embark on a brief expedition through the existing corpus of literature that meanders through the realms of planetary positioning, nuclear energetics, and the unsuspecting fusion of the two.
Smith, Doe, and Jones (2015) introduce the concept of "Celestial Coordination and Terrestrial Technologies," advocating for the consideration of cosmic phenomena in the realm of energy production. Conversely, "Astrology for Astrophysicists" by Starry McStellar (2013) provides a cosmic perspective on energy generation, albeit in a rather non-scientific manner.
Venturing into the realm of fiction that may yet hold nuggets of cosmic truth, we encounter Asimov's "Foundation" series, where the interplay of cosmic forces has far-reaching implications on societal metamorphoses. On a more down-to-earth note, H.G. Wells' "The War of the Worlds" portrays an energy-hungry species amid planetary alignments that culminate in intergalactic havoc.
In a twist of cosmic irony, a social media post from @SpaceGeekGalaxy on Twitter waggishly pondered, "If Uranus winks at Saturn and Brazil's nuclear power plants hum in unison, is that the cosmos orchestrating a celestial concert or just sheer coincidence? #CosmicConnections #NuclearMysteries"
In this cosmic quest for insight, we acknowledge the diversity of sources that both inform and engage our exploration of the Ur-anus-Saturn distance and nuclear power generation in Brazil. As our inquiry progresses, it is our hope that the discourse surrounding the cosmic nexus of planetary dynamics and earthly energy may take on a cosmic-erratic, yet scientifically enriched, trajectory.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil revealed a remarkably robust correlation. Over the time period from 1982 to 2021, the correlation coefficient between these seemingly disparate variables was calculated to be 0.9108140, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8295822. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this cosmic correlation.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the strong relationship between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. The unmistakably upward trend in the plot serves as a visual testament to the surprising association that emerged from our rigorous statistical analysis.
It is worth noting that while the correlation between celestial distances and nuclear power generation may at first seem as far-fetched as a rocket-powered unicorn, our findings speak to the unanticipated potential impact of cosmic configurations on energy production here on Earth. Whether one is a staunch believer in the gravitational influences of celestial bodies or a skeptic who prefers to keep their feet firmly planted on the ground, our results open the door to a cosmically charged dialogue on the complex interplay between the celestial and the terrestrial.
The findings from our study not only pique scientific curiosity but also bear implications for energy economists and policymakers. While we may not yet be ready to incorporate planetary positions into energy production forecasts, our research underscores the need to remain open to unexpected influences that may shape our understanding of energy systems and their dynamics. As the cosmic dance of planets unfolds, it appears that their movements may hold more sway over our earthly endeavors than previously imagined.
Overall, our results urge a reconsideration of the notion that the celestial and the terrestrial inhabit entirely separate spheres. The potential cosmic connection to earthly energy sources introduces an intriguing layer of complexity to our understanding of energy production. We invite readers to embrace this cosmic curiosity with the same blend of academic rigor and whimsical wonder that guided our own research journey.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil uncovered in this study defies conventional logic and elevates the discourse on the interplay between celestial dynamics and earthly energy production to a cosmic level. While the initial exploration of this cosmic nexus may have invoked skepticism akin to observing a cow attempting a moonwalk, our findings align with previous research that has hinted at the potential cosmic influence on terrestrial technologies (Smith, Doe, & Jones, 2015). The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, robustly bolsters the notion that planetary positioning holds unexpected sway over nuclear energetics in Brazil.
Astoundingly, our results echo the whimsical ponderings of @SpaceGeekGalaxy on Twitter, as we find ourselves contemplating whether the winking of Uranus at Saturn and the hum of Brazil's nuclear power plants indeed parallel a cosmic, albeit statistically significant, orchestration. As H.G. Wells' "The War of the Worlds" vividly portrays humanity's energy quest amid intergalactic turmoil, we are compelled to revisit the implications of celestial positioning on earthly energy endeavors.
Our findings lend credence to the notion that perhaps, just like the plot twists in an episode of "The Twilight Zone," the celestial and the terrestrial may indeed be more intricately intertwined than previously acknowledged. It appears that the cosmic dance of planets may hold undeniable relevance to our earthly feats, resonating with the sentiment illustrated in Asimov's "Foundation" series, where cosmic forces shape societal evolution.
By acknowledging the potential cosmic connection to earthly energy sources, our research adds a cosmic-erratic yet scientifically fortified layer of complexity to the understanding of energy production. As the astrophysicist-turned-astrologer Starry McStellar proposes, should we not be attuned to cosmic whispers that may guide our technological advancements, even if they arrive in the form of statistically quantifiable relationships?
The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of academia, carrying implications for energy economists and policymakers alike. While we may not yet be ready to craft energy forecasts based on the winks and nudges of distant planets, our findings underscore the need to remain open to the possibility of unexpected influences that may shape our understanding of energy systems and their dynamics. As amusing as the notion may seem, our research nudges our understanding of energy production into a realm where the celestial and the terrestrial are not as distinct as we once believed.
In portraying the cosmic connection between the Ur-anus-Saturn distance and nuclear power generation in Brazil, our research culminates in a blend of academic rigor and whimsical wonder, beckoning others to join us in a ponderous yet statistically sound exploration of the cosmic-cum-terrestrial interplay. As the pages of statistical analysis unfold, the question beckons: Could cosmic forces truly hold the key to unlocking the mysteries of earthly energy production, or are we merely witnessing a statistical fluke of astronomical proportions?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Uranus and Saturn and Nuclear power generation in Brazil. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study boldly goes where no research has gone before, as we investigate the possibly cosmic correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. Utilizing data from Astropy and the Energy Information Administration, our research team performed a comprehensive analysis from 1982 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strikingly significant correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, with p < 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship between the celestial distances and nuclear energy production. While the idea of planetary positions driving nuclear power output may seem as improbable as finding a star-shaped watermelon, our research underscores the potential impact of cosmic forces on earthly energy sources. Prepare to be astounded by the unexpected interplay between distant planets and earthly power plants!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of astronomy and energy production may sound like a far-fetched plotline for a science fiction novel, but our research delves into this cosmic connection with utmost seriousness and a dash of astronomical awe. The alignment of the planets in our solar system has long been a source of fascination and speculation, often inspiring both scientific inquiry and celestial superstitions. Amidst this celestial ballet, the distance between Uranus and Saturn emerges as the unlikely protagonist in our investigation, as we explore its potential influence on nuclear power generation in the earthly confines of Brazil.
While it may be tempting to dismiss such a notion as mere astrological hocus pocus, the allure of uncovering unexpected relationships in data cannot be underestimated. Our research aims to shine a scientific spotlight on this serendipitous correlation and elucidate the mysteries of its cosmic underpinnings. Through rigorous statistical analysis and a cosmic curiosity akin to stargazing on a clear night, we aim to unravel the celestial clues that may impact the earthly realm of nuclear energy production in Brazil.
In this paper, we will present the results of our investigation, which stands at the crossroads of celestial mechanics and energy economics. Brace yourselves for an academic odyssey that navigates the cosmic expanse to illuminate the nuanced relationship between the planetary positions and the nuclear power output in Brazil. As we venture forth into this uncharted territory, we invite you to don your metaphorical astronaut suits and embark on a journey that promises both scientific insights and a sprinkle of cosmic whimsy.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil revealed a remarkably robust correlation. Over the time period from 1982 to 2021, the correlation coefficient between these seemingly disparate variables was calculated to be 0.9108140, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8295822. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this cosmic correlation.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the strong relationship between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. The unmistakably upward trend in the plot serves as a visual testament to the surprising association that emerged from our rigorous statistical analysis.
It is worth noting that while the correlation between celestial distances and nuclear power generation may at first seem as far-fetched as a rocket-powered unicorn, our findings speak to the unanticipated potential impact of cosmic configurations on energy production here on Earth. Whether one is a staunch believer in the gravitational influences of celestial bodies or a skeptic who prefers to keep their feet firmly planted on the ground, our results open the door to a cosmically charged dialogue on the complex interplay between the celestial and the terrestrial.
The findings from our study not only pique scientific curiosity but also bear implications for energy economists and policymakers. While we may not yet be ready to incorporate planetary positions into energy production forecasts, our research underscores the need to remain open to unexpected influences that may shape our understanding of energy systems and their dynamics. As the cosmic dance of planets unfolds, it appears that their movements may hold more sway over our earthly endeavors than previously imagined.
Overall, our results urge a reconsideration of the notion that the celestial and the terrestrial inhabit entirely separate spheres. The potential cosmic connection to earthly energy sources introduces an intriguing layer of complexity to our understanding of energy production. We invite readers to embrace this cosmic curiosity with the same blend of academic rigor and whimsical wonder that guided our own research journey.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the celestial ballet between Uranus and Saturn and its intriguing interaction with nuclear power generation in Brazil has unveiled a cosmic correlation of astronomical significance. The statistically robust relationship between these seemingly disparate entities sends reverberations through the scientific and energy economics communities, akin to the gravitational pull of a celestial body on its cosmic neighbors.
The compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8295822, leaves little room for skepticism, much like spotting a shooting star on a clear night. The p-value of less than 0.01 further fortifies the validity of this cosmic connection, emphasizing its significance in the realm of statistical inquiry and astrological eccentricity.
Our findings, presented with the precision and rigor befitting a scientific paper, prompt a reevaluation of the boundaries between the cosmic and the earthly. While it may seem as improbable as discovering a moon made entirely of cheese, the force of planetary positions exerts an unforeseen influence on the earthly endeavors of energy production. As we navigate the cosmic expanse and chart the trajectories of our statistical analyses, we are reminded of the profound interconnectedness of the universe.
This unexpected cosmic interplay not only captivates the scientific imagination but also holds implications for energy economists and policymakers. While incorporating planetary positions into energy production forecasts may still reside in the realm of science fiction, our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic ballet as an informative element in our understanding of energy dynamics. Much like the enigmatic smile of the Cheshire Cat, the celestial forces at play call for expanded perspectives on the intricate web of influences shaping our energy systems.
In light of our revelatory findings, we assert with cosmic certainty that no further research in this area is needed. The celestial dance of Uranus and Saturn has unveiled its secrets, leaving us with a trove of data to ponder and a cosmic mystery to ponder at our leisure. With our metaphorical astronaut suits donned and our statistical telescopes focused, we bid farewell to this academic odyssey, secure in the knowledge that the cosmic connection to earthly energy sources has been unveiled, much like discovering a hidden constellation in the night sky.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Celestial Energy and Geopolitics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Cosmic Exploration and Energy Consortium
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil with an abstract of This study boldly goes where no research has gone before, as we investigate the possibly cosmic correlation between the distance separating Uranus and Saturn and nuclear power generation in Brazil. Utilizing data from Astropy and the Energy Information Administration, our research team performed a comprehensive analysis from 1982 to 2021. Surprisingly, our findings unveiled a strikingly significant correlation coefficient of 0.9108140, with p < 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship between the celestial distances and nuclear energy production. While the idea of planetary positions driving nuclear power output may seem as improbable as finding a star-shaped watermelon, our research underscores the potential impact of cosmic forces on earthly energy sources. Prepare to be astounded by the unexpected interplay between distant planets and earthly power plants!
ChatGPT:
planetary poles, Uranus-Saturn distance, nuclear energy, Brazil, cosmic correlation, Astropy, Energy Information Administration, celestial distances, nuclear power generation, planetary positions, planetary forces, energy sources
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The distance between Uranus and SaturnDetailed data title: The average distance between Uranus and Saturn as measured on the first day of each month
Source: Caclculated using Astropy
Additional Info: I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.
See what else correlates with The distance between Uranus and Saturn
Nuclear power generation in Brazil
Detailed data title: Total nuclear power generation in Brazil in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Nuclear power generation in Brazil
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8295822 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Nuclear power generation in Brazil) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The distance between Uranus and Saturn) over the 40 years from 1982 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.5E-16. 0.0000000000000003518389131213
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 3.5E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,842,209,780,403,795 random variables You don't actually need 2 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 39 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 39 because we have two variables measured over a period of 40 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.84, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
| 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
| The distance between Uranus and Saturn (Planetary distance (AU)) | 13.336 | 12.2208 | 11.2163 | 10.3697 | 9.72886 | 9.34309 | 9.25106 | 9.46773 | 9.97784 | 10.744 | 11.721 | 12.8579 | 14.1138 | 15.4539 | 16.8508 | 18.2714 | 19.6922 | 21.0895 | 22.4424 | 23.7228 | 24.9111 | 25.9888 | 26.942 | 27.7542 | 28.4186 | 28.9315 | 29.2926 | 29.503 | 29.5677 | 29.4929 | 29.2849 | 28.9515 | 28.4998 | 27.9362 | 27.2649 | 26.4942 | 25.6278 | 24.6697 | 23.6217 | 22.4927 |
| Nuclear power generation in Brazil (Billion kWh) | 0.051 | 0.174 | 2.733 | 2.921 | 0.117 | 0.915 | 0.31 | 1.513 | 1.936 | 1.37 | 1.663 | 0.419682 | 0.052212 | 2.39465 | 2.30755 | 3.01055 | 3.135 | 3.778 | 4.94 | 14.268 | 13.84 | 13.4 | 11.6 | 9.197 | 12.984 | 11.65 | 13.209 | 12.224 | 13.774 | 14.795 | 15.17 | 14.645 | 14.463 | 13.9074 | 14.974 | 14.8562 | 14.7945 | 15.1611 | 13.2094 | 14.704 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13.336,12.2208,11.2163,10.3697,9.72886,9.34309,9.25106,9.46773,9.97784,10.744,11.721,12.8579,14.1138,15.4539,16.8508,18.2714,19.6922,21.0895,22.4424,23.7228,24.9111,25.9888,26.942,27.7542,28.4186,28.9315,29.2926,29.503,29.5677,29.4929,29.2849,28.9515,28.4998,27.9362,27.2649,26.4942,25.6278,24.6697,23.6217,22.4927,])
array_2 = np.array([0.051,0.174,2.733,2.921,0.117,0.915,0.31,1.513,1.936,1.37,1.663,0.419682,0.052212,2.39465,2.30755,3.01055,3.135,3.778,4.94,14.268,13.84,13.4,11.6,9.197,12.984,11.65,13.209,12.224,13.774,14.795,15.17,14.645,14.463,13.9074,14.974,14.8562,14.7945,15.1611,13.2094,14.704,])
array_1_name = "The distance between Uranus and Saturn"
array_2_name = "Nuclear power generation in Brazil"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The distance between Uranus and Saturn
- Line chart for only Nuclear power generation in Brazil
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Power of Planetary Poles: Exploring the Ur-anus-Saturn Distance and Nuclear Energy in Brazil
Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!
Correlation ID: 2310 · Black Variable ID: 1966 · Red Variable ID: 23536
