about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,301 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and the second variable is Associates degrees awarded in Education.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air became cleaner, the local population found themselves filled with an inexplicable burst of energy and clarity. This led to a sudden surge in outdoor activities and impromptu dance-offs, ultimately causing a decrease in time spent on pursuing higher education degrees.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an Art Nouveau-style illustration of a serene scene in Little Rock, Arkansas at sunset. In the foreground, depict a group of proud graduates wearing caps and gowns, celebrating their achievement of receiving associate degrees in Education. The graduates should be depicted smiling and holding their diplomas, portrayed in a style reminiscent of classic Art Nouveau motifs. The orange hue cast by the setting sun should be visible in the background, creating a dreamy atmosphere. Add delicate swirls and intricate linework to capture the elegance and flowing forms characteristic of the Art Nouveau style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Less than ideal air quality in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Scalar art Futuristic Art nouveau Vaporwave
ChatGPT: Art nouveau

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Less than ideal air quality in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Little Rock, Arkansas, smog hangs heavy in the air as the sun sets, casting an orange hue over the city. In the foreground, a group of proud graduates, wearing caps and gowns, hold their associate degrees in Education, smiling as they celebrate their achievement despite the less than ideal air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Art nouveau ] and depicting this scene: In Little Rock, Arkansas, smog hangs heavy in the air as the sun sets, casting an orange hue over the city. In the foreground, a group of proud graduates, wearing caps and gowns, hold their associate degrees in Education, smiling as they celebrate their achievement despite the less than ideal air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an Art Nouveau-style illustration of a serene scene in Little Rock, Arkansas at sunset. In the foreground, depict a group of proud graduates wearing caps and gowns, celebrating their achievement of receiving associate degrees in Education. The graduates should be depicted smiling and holding their diplomas, portrayed in a style reminiscent of classic Art Nouveau motifs. The orange hue cast by the setting sun should be visible in the background, creating a dreamy atmosphere. Add delicate swirls and intricate linework to capture the elegance and flowing forms characteristic of the Art Nouveau style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas caused Associates degrees awarded in Education to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education

The Journal of Environmental Education Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and National Center for Education Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing easy, but sweeping up with the latest data, our study investigates the surprising link between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the awarding of associate's degrees in education. Our research team delved into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics to tackle this seemingly far-fetched connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2011 to 2021, our findings present a compelling case for further investigation. It seems the air in Little Rock isn't the only thing that's heating up - the pursuit of education appears to be influenced by the air quality in this southern city!

Furthermore, our analysis reveals that as air pollution levels increase, the number of associates degrees awarded in education skyrockets. Perhaps the students are trying to "clear the air" around educational injustice, or maybe they're taking inspiration from the resilience of the environment. Regardless, the statistical evidence is nothing to sneeze at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality. Join us as we unpack this unexpected relationship and consider the fresh air of curiosity it has brought to our understanding of educational inclinations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing easy, but sweeping up with the latest data, our study investigates the surprising link between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the awarding of associate's degrees in education. Our research team delved into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics to tackle this seemingly far-fetched connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2011 to 2021, our findings present a compelling case for further investigation. It seems the air in Little Rock isn't the only thing that's heating up - the pursuit of education appears to be influenced by the air quality in this southern city!

Furthermore, our analysis reveals that as air pollution levels increase, the number of associates degrees awarded in education skyrockets. Perhaps the students are trying to "clear the air" around educational injustice, or maybe they're taking inspiration from the resilience of the environment. Regardless, the statistical evidence is nothing to sneeze at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality. Join us as we unpack this unexpected relationship and consider the fresh air of curiosity it has brought to our understanding of educational inclinations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Amidst the serene charm of Little Rock, Arkansas, where the southern hospitality flows as freely as sweet tea, a peculiar phenomenon has captured the attention of researchers and casual observers alike. Despite the tranquil façade, the air quality in this delightful city has been found to have an intriguing connection to the issuance of associate's degrees in the field of education. It's almost as if the air pollution is playing a rather "punny" role in shaping the educational landscape of Little Rock!

It's no secret that air pollution is a serious issue with far-reaching consequences, but the unexpected correlation with educational pursuits has left many scratching their heads in bewilderment. The proverbial fog surrounding this relationship has prompted our research team to embark on an investigative journey that delves into both environmental and educational data, seeking to shed light on this seemingly inexplicable connection. It's almost as if the educational aspirations of the citizens in Little Rock are as "polluted" by the air as the city itself!

As we navigate this unusual intersection of air quality and educational attainment, our study aims to not only unveil the statistical evidence but also to explore the potential underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation. We're in for a breath of fresh air as we unravel the mystery behind this unexpected relationship and evaluate its implications in the realms of public health and educational policy. It appears that the connection between air pollution and educational pursuits is not just a matter of "hot air" after all!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing easy, but sweeping up with the latest data, our study investigates the surprising link between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the awarding of associate's degrees in education. Our research team delved into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics to tackle this seemingly far-fetched connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2011 to 2021, our findings present a compelling case for further investigation. It seems the air in Little Rock isn't the only thing that's heating up - the pursuit of education appears to be influenced by the air quality in this southern city!

Furthermore, our analysis reveals that as air pollution levels increase, the number of associates degrees awarded in education skyrockets. Perhaps the students are trying to "clear the air" around educational injustice, or maybe they're taking inspiration from the resilience of the environment. Regardless, the statistical evidence is nothing to sneeze at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality. Join us as we unpack this unexpected relationship and consider the fresh air of curiosity it has brought to our understanding of educational inclinations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Amidst the serene charm of Little Rock, Arkansas, where the southern hospitality flows as freely as sweet tea, a peculiar phenomenon has captured the attention of researchers and casual observers alike. Despite the tranquil façade, the air quality in this delightful city has been found to have an intriguing connection to the issuance of associate's degrees in the field of education. It's almost as if the air pollution is playing a rather "punny" role in shaping the educational landscape of Little Rock!
It's no secret that air pollution is a serious issue with far-reaching consequences, but the unexpected correlation with educational pursuits has left many scratching their heads in bewilderment. The proverbial fog surrounding this relationship has prompted our research team to embark on an investigative journey that delves into both environmental and educational data, seeking to shed light on this seemingly inexplicable connection. It's almost as if the educational aspirations of the citizens in Little Rock are as "polluted" by the air as the city itself!
As we navigate this unusual intersection of air quality and educational attainment, our study aims to not only unveil the statistical evidence but also to explore the potential underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation. We're in for a breath of fresh air as we unravel the mystery behind this unexpected relationship and evaluate its implications in the realms of public health and educational policy. It appears that the connection between air pollution and educational pursuits is not just a matter of "hot air" after all!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Recent studies have shed light on the surprising relationship between air pollution and educational outcomes. In "Asthma and Academic Achievement," Smith and Doe highlight the detrimental effects of air pollution on students' academic performance, indicating a negative correlation between air quality and educational success. Conversely, in "Environmental Determinants of Education," Jones suggests a potential link between environmental factors and educational motivation, hinting at the possibility of a positive association in certain contexts.
Now, let's dive into the world of literature to uncover additional insights. In "Air Pollution and Its Impact on Education," lorem and ipsum offer a comprehensive overview of the various ways in which air pollution can influence educational pursuits. Additionally, "The Effects of Environmental Factors on Learning" by lorem delves into the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and cognitive development, providing valuable context for our investigation.

Shifting our focus to fictional works that may shed light on this peculiar connection, "Breathless in Little Rock" by lorem features a protagonist who discovers a hidden talent for education amid the city's polluted air, adding an intriguing narrative layer to our exploration. Similarly, "The Polluted Pursuit of Knowledge" by ipsum presents a dystopian tale where knowledge-seeking is inexorably linked to the polluted atmosphere, offering a thought-provoking parallel to the real-world phenomenon under scrutiny.

Going off the beaten path, our research team also took an unconventional approach to data collection, perusing an array of unexpected sources. In an unexpected turn of events, it turns out that CVS receipts, usually overlooked and swiftly discarded, provide a wealth of information on consumer habits and, possibly, subliminal connections between air quality and educational aspirations. Who knew that a mundane trip to the pharmacy could hold the key to unraveling this enigmatic correlation? It seems that in this research process, we've truly learned to expect the unexpected!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and National Center for Education Statistics . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing easy, but sweeping up with the latest data, our study investigates the surprising link between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the awarding of associate's degrees in education. Our research team delved into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics to tackle this seemingly far-fetched connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2011 to 2021, our findings present a compelling case for further investigation. It seems the air in Little Rock isn't the only thing that's heating up - the pursuit of education appears to be influenced by the air quality in this southern city!

Furthermore, our analysis reveals that as air pollution levels increase, the number of associates degrees awarded in education skyrockets. Perhaps the students are trying to "clear the air" around educational injustice, or maybe they're taking inspiration from the resilience of the environment. Regardless, the statistical evidence is nothing to sneeze at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality. Join us as we unpack this unexpected relationship and consider the fresh air of curiosity it has brought to our understanding of educational inclinations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Amidst the serene charm of Little Rock, Arkansas, where the southern hospitality flows as freely as sweet tea, a peculiar phenomenon has captured the attention of researchers and casual observers alike. Despite the tranquil façade, the air quality in this delightful city has been found to have an intriguing connection to the issuance of associate's degrees in the field of education. It's almost as if the air pollution is playing a rather "punny" role in shaping the educational landscape of Little Rock!
It's no secret that air pollution is a serious issue with far-reaching consequences, but the unexpected correlation with educational pursuits has left many scratching their heads in bewilderment. The proverbial fog surrounding this relationship has prompted our research team to embark on an investigative journey that delves into both environmental and educational data, seeking to shed light on this seemingly inexplicable connection. It's almost as if the educational aspirations of the citizens in Little Rock are as "polluted" by the air as the city itself!
As we navigate this unusual intersection of air quality and educational attainment, our study aims to not only unveil the statistical evidence but also to explore the potential underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation. We're in for a breath of fresh air as we unravel the mystery behind this unexpected relationship and evaluate its implications in the realms of public health and educational policy. It appears that the connection between air pollution and educational pursuits is not just a matter of "hot air" after all!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the relationship between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and the awarding of associate's degrees in education, our research team employed a variety of data collection and analysis methods that were as thorough as a 10-year-old meticulously inspecting their Halloween candy haul. Our primary sources of information were the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), both of which provided a treasure trove of data from the years 2011 to 2021. We gathered air quality data such as levels of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and ozone from the EPA, and education-related statistics including the number of associate's degrees awarded in the field of education from the NCES, just like a savvy pirate collecting valuable booty.

To determine the relationship between air pollution and educational outcomes, we employed a series of robust statistical analyses that would make even the most seasoned data scientist do a double take. First, we calculated the average annual levels of air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education for each year within our study period. Then, we used various regression models to examine the association between these two variables, ensuring that our analyses were as airtight as a sealed jar of pickles.

Our team also took into account several potential confounding factors, such as socioeconomic status, population demographics, and educational resources within the region. These were incorporated into our models to prevent any "pollution" of the results by extraneous variables, as we didn't want any statistical "smog" to cloud our findings. Additionally, we conducted a series of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results and to ensure that our findings were as reliable as a trustworthy weather forecast.

Finally, to add a layer of depth to our investigation, we conducted qualitative interviews with educators, students, and community members in Little Rock to gain insights into the potential mechanisms underlying the observed relationship. This qualitative component allowed us to breathe life into our statistical findings and to capture the nuanced perspectives of those directly affected by both the air quality and the educational landscape in the city. It was a breath of fresh air to interact with the local community and hear their firsthand experiences, adding a human touch to our otherwise numerical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and National Center for Education Statistics .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9671025, r-squared of 0.9352873, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing easy, but sweeping up with the latest data, our study investigates the surprising link between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the awarding of associate's degrees in education. Our research team delved into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics to tackle this seemingly far-fetched connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2011 to 2021, our findings present a compelling case for further investigation. It seems the air in Little Rock isn't the only thing that's heating up - the pursuit of education appears to be influenced by the air quality in this southern city!

Furthermore, our analysis reveals that as air pollution levels increase, the number of associates degrees awarded in education skyrockets. Perhaps the students are trying to "clear the air" around educational injustice, or maybe they're taking inspiration from the resilience of the environment. Regardless, the statistical evidence is nothing to sneeze at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality. Join us as we unpack this unexpected relationship and consider the fresh air of curiosity it has brought to our understanding of educational inclinations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Amidst the serene charm of Little Rock, Arkansas, where the southern hospitality flows as freely as sweet tea, a peculiar phenomenon has captured the attention of researchers and casual observers alike. Despite the tranquil façade, the air quality in this delightful city has been found to have an intriguing connection to the issuance of associate's degrees in the field of education. It's almost as if the air pollution is playing a rather "punny" role in shaping the educational landscape of Little Rock!
It's no secret that air pollution is a serious issue with far-reaching consequences, but the unexpected correlation with educational pursuits has left many scratching their heads in bewilderment. The proverbial fog surrounding this relationship has prompted our research team to embark on an investigative journey that delves into both environmental and educational data, seeking to shed light on this seemingly inexplicable connection. It's almost as if the educational aspirations of the citizens in Little Rock are as "polluted" by the air as the city itself!
As we navigate this unusual intersection of air quality and educational attainment, our study aims to not only unveil the statistical evidence but also to explore the potential underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation. We're in for a breath of fresh air as we unravel the mystery behind this unexpected relationship and evaluate its implications in the realms of public health and educational policy. It appears that the connection between air pollution and educational pursuits is not just a matter of "hot air" after all!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the number of associate's degrees awarded in the field of education has revealed a remarkably strong and positive correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 indicates a striking linear relationship between the two variables. It's almost as if the air pollution is encouraging the citizens of Little Rock to reach for educational heights, regardless of the haze - talk about a breath of fresh determination!

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9352873 further emphasizes the robustness of this association. This means that approximately 93.53% of the variability in the number of associate's degrees awarded in education can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. Looks like the air quality in Little Rock is not just affecting lung capacity but also educational aspirations!

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the assertion that there is a significant relationship between air pollution and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education. It's as clear as the air on a breezy day - this connection is no mere coincidence!

Additionally, our research has produced a compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrating the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education. The graph visually captures the upward trend as air pollution increases, accompanied by a surge in the awarding of education degrees. It's as if the citizens of Little Rock are using the soot-filled air to "fuel" their educational aspirations!

In conclusion, the results of our analysis indicate a compelling and unexpected relationship between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the issuance of associate's degrees in the field of education. This unanticipated connection offers a breath of fresh air in understanding the multifaceted influences on educational pursuits, and it certainly adds a breath of whimsy to the potential factors affecting academic achievements.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing easy, but sweeping up with the latest data, our study investigates the surprising link between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the awarding of associate's degrees in education. Our research team delved into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics to tackle this seemingly far-fetched connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2011 to 2021, our findings present a compelling case for further investigation. It seems the air in Little Rock isn't the only thing that's heating up - the pursuit of education appears to be influenced by the air quality in this southern city!

Furthermore, our analysis reveals that as air pollution levels increase, the number of associates degrees awarded in education skyrockets. Perhaps the students are trying to "clear the air" around educational injustice, or maybe they're taking inspiration from the resilience of the environment. Regardless, the statistical evidence is nothing to sneeze at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality. Join us as we unpack this unexpected relationship and consider the fresh air of curiosity it has brought to our understanding of educational inclinations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Recent studies have shed light on the surprising relationship between air pollution and educational outcomes. In "Asthma and Academic Achievement," Smith and Doe highlight the detrimental effects of air pollution on students' academic performance, indicating a negative correlation between air quality and educational success. Conversely, in "Environmental Determinants of Education," Jones suggests a potential link between environmental factors and educational motivation, hinting at the possibility of a positive association in certain contexts.
Now, let's dive into the world of literature to uncover additional insights. In "Air Pollution and Its Impact on Education," lorem and ipsum offer a comprehensive overview of the various ways in which air pollution can influence educational pursuits. Additionally, "The Effects of Environmental Factors on Learning" by lorem delves into the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and cognitive development, providing valuable context for our investigation.
Shifting our focus to fictional works that may shed light on this peculiar connection, "Breathless in Little Rock" by lorem features a protagonist who discovers a hidden talent for education amid the city's polluted air, adding an intriguing narrative layer to our exploration. Similarly, "The Polluted Pursuit of Knowledge" by ipsum presents a dystopian tale where knowledge-seeking is inexorably linked to the polluted atmosphere, offering a thought-provoking parallel to the real-world phenomenon under scrutiny.
Going off the beaten path, our research team also took an unconventional approach to data collection, perusing an array of unexpected sources. In an unexpected turn of events, it turns out that CVS receipts, usually overlooked and swiftly discarded, provide a wealth of information on consumer habits and, possibly, subliminal connections between air quality and educational aspirations. Who knew that a mundane trip to the pharmacy could hold the key to unraveling this enigmatic correlation? It seems that in this research process, we've truly learned to expect the unexpected!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the number of associate's degrees awarded in the field of education has revealed a remarkably strong and positive correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 indicates a striking linear relationship between the two variables. It's almost as if the air pollution is encouraging the citizens of Little Rock to reach for educational heights, regardless of the haze - talk about a breath of fresh determination!
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9352873 further emphasizes the robustness of this association. This means that approximately 93.53% of the variability in the number of associate's degrees awarded in education can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. Looks like the air quality in Little Rock is not just affecting lung capacity but also educational aspirations!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the assertion that there is a significant relationship between air pollution and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education. It's as clear as the air on a breezy day - this connection is no mere coincidence!
Additionally, our research has produced a compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrating the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education. The graph visually captures the upward trend as air pollution increases, accompanied by a surge in the awarding of education degrees. It's as if the citizens of Little Rock are using the soot-filled air to "fuel" their educational aspirations!
In conclusion, the results of our analysis indicate a compelling and unexpected relationship between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the issuance of associate's degrees in the field of education. This unanticipated connection offers a breath of fresh air in understanding the multifaceted influences on educational pursuits, and it certainly adds a breath of whimsy to the potential factors affecting academic achievements.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have unearthed a rather surprising and robust relationship between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the number of associate's degrees awarded in the field of education. As we reflect on the results, it's clear that this unexpected correlation is no mere puff of smoke - it's a lungful of scientific intrigue! The previous research by Smith and Doe on the detrimental effects of air pollution on academic performance and Jones' hints of a potential positive association between environmental factors and educational motivation, seem to have found resonance in our study. It appears that the air in Little Rock is not only influencing respiratory health but also education, prompting students to reach for their educational aspirations amidst the haze.

The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 highlights the strength of the relationship between air pollution levels and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education. This statistical "breath of fresh air" provides compelling evidence that the city's air quality is indeed associated with the educational endeavors of its residents. It's as if the pollution is unwittingly acting as a "motivational mist" for educational pursuits, creating a new layer of depth to the concept of environmental influence on learning. This correlation coefficient is certainly nothing to "sneeze" at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9352873 suggests that approximately 93.53% of the variability in the number of associate's degrees awarded in education can be attributed to variations in air pollution levels. This substantial variability elucidates the impactful role of air pollution on educational choices, offering a compelling insight into the multifaceted nature of environmental influences on academic pursuits. It's almost as if the polluted atmosphere is "pollen-ating" the educational drive in the city, fostering a proactive response to adverse environmental conditions.

The p-value of less than 0.01 bolsters the significance of our findings, firmly rejecting the null hypothesis and emphasizing the genuine nature of the relationship between air pollution and educational aspirations in Little Rock. This quantifiable evidence cements the validity of our results, further underlining the need to consider air quality as a substantive factor in educational endeavors. The statistical significance of this relationship is as clear as the air on a crisp morning - a bona fide revelation amidst the atmospheric haze.

In conclusion, our findings offer an intriguing perspective on the unexpected nexus between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the pursuit of educational credentials in the field of education. This whimsical correlation adds a breath of fresh curiosity to the influences shaping academic achievements, showcasing the far-reaching impact of environmental factors on educational proclivities. It seems that in Little Rock, the pursuit of education has indeed found new "heights" amidst the misty air, fueling a "sweeping" surge in the awarding of associate's degrees in education. With these results, we are reminded that even in the thickest of fogs, the pursuit of knowledge can shine through like a guiding beacon, leaving us to "breathe in" the marvels of unforeseen connections in the academic landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates degrees awarded in Education. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education

[[ABSTRACT]]
Breathing easy, but sweeping up with the latest data, our study investigates the surprising link between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the awarding of associate's degrees in education. Our research team delved into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics to tackle this seemingly far-fetched connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2011 to 2021, our findings present a compelling case for further investigation. It seems the air in Little Rock isn't the only thing that's heating up - the pursuit of education appears to be influenced by the air quality in this southern city!

Furthermore, our analysis reveals that as air pollution levels increase, the number of associates degrees awarded in education skyrockets. Perhaps the students are trying to "clear the air" around educational injustice, or maybe they're taking inspiration from the resilience of the environment. Regardless, the statistical evidence is nothing to sneeze at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality. Join us as we unpack this unexpected relationship and consider the fresh air of curiosity it has brought to our understanding of educational inclinations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Amidst the serene charm of Little Rock, Arkansas, where the southern hospitality flows as freely as sweet tea, a peculiar phenomenon has captured the attention of researchers and casual observers alike. Despite the tranquil façade, the air quality in this delightful city has been found to have an intriguing connection to the issuance of associate's degrees in the field of education. It's almost as if the air pollution is playing a rather "punny" role in shaping the educational landscape of Little Rock!
It's no secret that air pollution is a serious issue with far-reaching consequences, but the unexpected correlation with educational pursuits has left many scratching their heads in bewilderment. The proverbial fog surrounding this relationship has prompted our research team to embark on an investigative journey that delves into both environmental and educational data, seeking to shed light on this seemingly inexplicable connection. It's almost as if the educational aspirations of the citizens in Little Rock are as "polluted" by the air as the city itself!
As we navigate this unusual intersection of air quality and educational attainment, our study aims to not only unveil the statistical evidence but also to explore the potential underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation. We're in for a breath of fresh air as we unravel the mystery behind this unexpected relationship and evaluate its implications in the realms of public health and educational policy. It appears that the connection between air pollution and educational pursuits is not just a matter of "hot air" after all!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the number of associate's degrees awarded in the field of education has revealed a remarkably strong and positive correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 indicates a striking linear relationship between the two variables. It's almost as if the air pollution is encouraging the citizens of Little Rock to reach for educational heights, regardless of the haze - talk about a breath of fresh determination!
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9352873 further emphasizes the robustness of this association. This means that approximately 93.53% of the variability in the number of associate's degrees awarded in education can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. Looks like the air quality in Little Rock is not just affecting lung capacity but also educational aspirations!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the assertion that there is a significant relationship between air pollution and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education. It's as clear as the air on a breezy day - this connection is no mere coincidence!
Additionally, our research has produced a compelling scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrating the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education. The graph visually captures the upward trend as air pollution increases, accompanied by a surge in the awarding of education degrees. It's as if the citizens of Little Rock are using the soot-filled air to "fuel" their educational aspirations!
In conclusion, the results of our analysis indicate a compelling and unexpected relationship between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the issuance of associate's degrees in the field of education. This unanticipated connection offers a breath of fresh air in understanding the multifaceted influences on educational pursuits, and it certainly adds a breath of whimsy to the potential factors affecting academic achievements.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unearthed a surprisingly robust correlation between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the number of associate's degrees awarded in education. The statistical evidence presented in our analysis leaves little room for doubt - it seems that the citizens of Little Rock are not just breathing in the air, they're breathing in the inspiration to pursue educational excellence! It's almost as if the air pollution is acting as a cheerleader, saying, "You can do it! Clear the air and ace those exams!"

The compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and the strikingly low p-value provide undeniable support for the significant relationship observed in our findings. It's as if the air pollution is saying, "Let's clear the air on this - education is the way forward!" This unexpected connection between environmental factors and educational pursuits certainly adds a breath of fresh air to the discourse on the determinants of academic achievement.

Our research has not only illustrated the statistical strength of this association but has also sparked a breath of curiosity about the potential underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation. It's as if our study has blown the lid off the box of ideas and uncovered a new realm of "Air-ucational" possibilities! Not to mention, the visually captivating scatterplot (Fig. 1) paints a picture of determination in the face of pollution, as if the citizens are saying, "We won't let the air quality 'cloud' our educational aspirations!"

As we draw the curtain on this investigation, it seems that no more research is needed in this area. Our findings have provided a breath of fresh insight into the unexpected influence of air pollution on the educational landscape of Little Rock, Arkansas. It's as if we've cleared the air on this topic once and for all - there's a distinct connection, and it's nothing to sneeze at!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Education Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Sustainable Futures Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breathing Easy: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas and Associates Degrees Awarded in Education with an abstract of Breathing easy, but sweeping up with the latest data, our study investigates the surprising link between air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas, and the awarding of associate's degrees in education. Our research team delved into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Center for Education Statistics to tackle this seemingly far-fetched connection. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671025 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2011 to 2021, our findings present a compelling case for further investigation. It seems the air in Little Rock isn't the only thing that's heating up - the pursuit of education appears to be influenced by the air quality in this southern city!
Furthermore, our analysis reveals that as air pollution levels increase, the number of associates degrees awarded in education skyrockets. Perhaps the students are trying to "clear the air" around educational injustice, or maybe they're taking inspiration from the resilience of the environment. Regardless, the statistical evidence is nothing to sneeze at - unless, of course, you're affected by the poor air quality. Join us as we unpack this unexpected relationship and consider the fresh air of curiosity it has brought to our understanding of educational inclinations.

ChatGPT:

Little Rock, Arkansas, air pollution, Associates Degrees in education, correlation coefficient, Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Education Statistics, educational injustice, air quality, statistical evidence, educational inclinations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas

Associates degrees awarded in Education
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Education
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Education

Correlation r = 0.9671025 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9352873 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Education) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000011859389239116090000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 843,214 random variables You don't actually need 843 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas (Bad air quality days)60.547959.836145.753437.534236.164429.781430.958929.58935.616424.863441.6438
Associates degrees awarded in Education (Degrees awarded)2046020762187441760517178170321660316180162101617918144




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([60.5479,59.8361,45.7534,37.5342,36.1644,29.7814,30.9589,29.589,35.6164,24.8634,41.6438,])
array_2 = np.array([20460,20762,18744,17605,17178,17032,16603,16180,16210,16179,18144,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Little Rock, Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Education"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 2301 · Black Variable ID: 20830 · Red Variable ID: 1223
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0