about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,299 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to hide a body'.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people became knowledgeable about clinical and medical lab science, they also became more skilled at preserving and concealing bodies using the latest scientific methods. Additionally, their understanding of anatomy and physiology may have led to more creative and effective ways of hiding a body. Perhaps there's a correlation between knowing how to conduct lab tests and knowing how to cover up the evidence. Or maybe it's just a case of having a 'diploma' in making cadavers disappear!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image of a person in a high-tech laboratory, holding their Associate's degree in clinical/medical lab science, performing experiments with focus, while in the background, a computer screen displays Google open with the search "how to hide a body." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art A photo-realistic image An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' High-tech a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A person holding their Associate's degree in clinical/medical lab science is seen working diligently in a lab, while in the background, a computer screen shows Google open with the search "how to hide a body."

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: A person holding their Associate's degree in clinical/medical lab science is seen working diligently in a lab, while in the background, a computer screen shows Google open with the search "how to hide a body." Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image of a person in a high-tech laboratory, holding their Associate's degree in clinical/medical lab science, performing experiments with focus, while in the background, a computer screen displays Google open with the search "how to hide a body."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science caused how to hide a body (Google searches for 'how to hide a body') to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'

The Journal of Criminal Quirks and Quandaries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this rib-tickling study, we uncover the surprising relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our research team delved deep into data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, wielding statistical tools with more finesse than a surgeon's scalpel. We discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021, leaving us more impressed than a phlebotomist finding the perfect vein.

Unpacking this darkly comical correlation, our findings suggest that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded skyrocket, so do the Google searches for curious queries on concealment. Perhaps the potential culprits are seeking inspiration from the investigative techniques taught in these programs, or maybe it's just a case of too much CSI binge-watching. Nevertheless, our study adds a dash of humor and a dollop of insight to the previously uncharted territory of academic inquiry.

As a wise father once said, "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough."



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this rib-tickling study, we uncover the surprising relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our research team delved deep into data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, wielding statistical tools with more finesse than a surgeon's scalpel. We discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021, leaving us more impressed than a phlebotomist finding the perfect vein.

Unpacking this darkly comical correlation, our findings suggest that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded skyrocket, so do the Google searches for curious queries on concealment. Perhaps the potential culprits are seeking inspiration from the investigative techniques taught in these programs, or maybe it's just a case of too much CSI binge-watching. Nevertheless, our study adds a dash of humor and a dollop of insight to the previously uncharted territory of academic inquiry.

As a wise father once said, "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough."


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the delightful dance of correlation and causation. One might say it's like trying to decipher whether the chicken or the egg came first - a mystery wrapped in an enigma, draped in a lab coat. In this electrifying round of academic sleuthing, we venture into the captivating interplay between educational trends and, let's say, less savory interests. As the old adage goes, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."

The convergence of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the seemingly incongruous Google searches for 'how to hide a body' presents a puzzle more perplexing than an unsolvable cryptogram. One might wonder what leads individuals down the digital rabbit hole of such macabre inquiries, and how this correlated with educational pursuits that are typically associated with gallant, life-saving endeavors. If nothing else, this study aims to shed some light on this peculiar association, all the while stirring a cauldron of statistical intrigue and mirth.

Now, let's embark on this voyage of discovery with the buoyant enthusiasm of a buoyant force in fluid dynamics – but with a tad more gallows humor. As we dive into the empirical realms of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we must remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it certainly gives us more material for dinner party conversations than the standard pleasantries.

"You're not fully dressed until you sparkle," a wise statistician once mused. And as we shimmer in the glow of significance levels and confidence intervals, we aim to uncover the sparkling truth behind this peculiar nexus between academic pursuits and internet queries fit for a crime novel. Let's peel back the layers of this anomaly with the curiosity of a feline and the skepticism of a seasoned investigator, all while keeping an oven mitt handy for handling those piping-hot statistical inferences.

So, without further ado, let's dissect this conundrum, armed with our wit, a hearty appetite for knowledge, and a keen eye for the unexpected. As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between lab coats and potential exploits in concealment, brace yourself for a whirlwind adventure that's as thrilling as a rollercoaster ride through a data set. After all, in the whimsical world of research, even the darkest correlations have their comedic silver linings.

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." And as we navigate through this whimsical journey of discovery, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this academic escapade, complete with all the puns and statistical shenanigans one could wish for.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this rib-tickling study, we uncover the surprising relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our research team delved deep into data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, wielding statistical tools with more finesse than a surgeon's scalpel. We discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021, leaving us more impressed than a phlebotomist finding the perfect vein.

Unpacking this darkly comical correlation, our findings suggest that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded skyrocket, so do the Google searches for curious queries on concealment. Perhaps the potential culprits are seeking inspiration from the investigative techniques taught in these programs, or maybe it's just a case of too much CSI binge-watching. Nevertheless, our study adds a dash of humor and a dollop of insight to the previously uncharted territory of academic inquiry.

As a wise father once said, "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough."


-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance of correlation and causation. One might say it's like trying to decipher whether the chicken or the egg came first - a mystery wrapped in an enigma, draped in a lab coat. In this electrifying round of academic sleuthing, we venture into the captivating interplay between educational trends and, let's say, less savory interests. As the old adage goes, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
The convergence of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the seemingly incongruous Google searches for 'how to hide a body' presents a puzzle more perplexing than an unsolvable cryptogram. One might wonder what leads individuals down the digital rabbit hole of such macabre inquiries, and how this correlated with educational pursuits that are typically associated with gallant, life-saving endeavors. If nothing else, this study aims to shed some light on this peculiar association, all the while stirring a cauldron of statistical intrigue and mirth.
Now, let's embark on this voyage of discovery with the buoyant enthusiasm of a buoyant force in fluid dynamics – but with a tad more gallows humor. As we dive into the empirical realms of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we must remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it certainly gives us more material for dinner party conversations than the standard pleasantries.
"You're not fully dressed until you sparkle," a wise statistician once mused. And as we shimmer in the glow of significance levels and confidence intervals, we aim to uncover the sparkling truth behind this peculiar nexus between academic pursuits and internet queries fit for a crime novel. Let's peel back the layers of this anomaly with the curiosity of a feline and the skepticism of a seasoned investigator, all while keeping an oven mitt handy for handling those piping-hot statistical inferences.
So, without further ado, let's dissect this conundrum, armed with our wit, a hearty appetite for knowledge, and a keen eye for the unexpected. As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between lab coats and potential exploits in concealment, brace yourself for a whirlwind adventure that's as thrilling as a rollercoaster ride through a data set. After all, in the whimsical world of research, even the darkest correlations have their comedic silver linings.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." And as we navigate through this whimsical journey of discovery, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this academic escapade, complete with all the puns and statistical shenanigans one could wish for.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science has shown a steady increase in recent years. Similarly, "Doe and Smith" unearth the growing popularity of online searches related to forensic laboratory techniques and practices. These serious and dignified works lay the scholarly foundation for our investigation into the intriguing correlation between these educational pursuits and the rather bizarre inquiries surfacing on the internet.

However, the plot thickens when we consider the curious connection between these seemingly disparate realms. "Jones" delves into the psychology of internet search behavior, shedding light on the motivations behind delving into the darker corners of cyberspace. Little did we know, this paper's findings would be spookier than a ghost in a laboratory.

Turning to non-fiction works, "Forensic Science: The Basics" and "Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science" offer profound insights into the world of forensic science, which might pique the interest of those seeking clandestine knowledge. On a lighter note, fictional titles such as "Gone Girl" and "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" add a touch of mystery and intrigue to our investigation. The authors would like to report that they are currently looking for "Clue: The Movie" in hopes of uncovering additional clues for the study.

As we navigate through this labyrinth of academic inquiry, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected twists and turns that have emerged. There's a certain irony in the fact that those pursuing careers in Clinical/Medical Lab Science may also have a keen interest in queries related to the concealment of, dare we say, bodies. One thing is for certain – our research has sparked more curiosity than a cat in a library.

In "The Silence of the Lambs" and "Dexter," we find fictional portrayals of individuals with a profound understanding of human anatomy and a penchant for, shall we say, unconventional uses of their knowledge. These depictions offer a speculative layer to our investigation, one that's as intriguing as it is unsettling.

But fear not, dear reader – the gravity of our research does not escape us. We are fully aware that correlation does not imply causation, but we couldn't help but be tickled by the whimsical association we stumbled upon. After all, every good study needs a touch of levity, just like every good crime scene needs a keen investigator. And with that, we eagerly anticipate the sturdy feedback of our esteemed peers and the groans of delight at our puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this rib-tickling study, we uncover the surprising relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our research team delved deep into data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, wielding statistical tools with more finesse than a surgeon's scalpel. We discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021, leaving us more impressed than a phlebotomist finding the perfect vein.

Unpacking this darkly comical correlation, our findings suggest that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded skyrocket, so do the Google searches for curious queries on concealment. Perhaps the potential culprits are seeking inspiration from the investigative techniques taught in these programs, or maybe it's just a case of too much CSI binge-watching. Nevertheless, our study adds a dash of humor and a dollop of insight to the previously uncharted territory of academic inquiry.

As a wise father once said, "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough."


[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance of correlation and causation. One might say it's like trying to decipher whether the chicken or the egg came first - a mystery wrapped in an enigma, draped in a lab coat. In this electrifying round of academic sleuthing, we venture into the captivating interplay between educational trends and, let's say, less savory interests. As the old adage goes, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
The convergence of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the seemingly incongruous Google searches for 'how to hide a body' presents a puzzle more perplexing than an unsolvable cryptogram. One might wonder what leads individuals down the digital rabbit hole of such macabre inquiries, and how this correlated with educational pursuits that are typically associated with gallant, life-saving endeavors. If nothing else, this study aims to shed some light on this peculiar association, all the while stirring a cauldron of statistical intrigue and mirth.
Now, let's embark on this voyage of discovery with the buoyant enthusiasm of a buoyant force in fluid dynamics – but with a tad more gallows humor. As we dive into the empirical realms of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we must remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it certainly gives us more material for dinner party conversations than the standard pleasantries.
"You're not fully dressed until you sparkle," a wise statistician once mused. And as we shimmer in the glow of significance levels and confidence intervals, we aim to uncover the sparkling truth behind this peculiar nexus between academic pursuits and internet queries fit for a crime novel. Let's peel back the layers of this anomaly with the curiosity of a feline and the skepticism of a seasoned investigator, all while keeping an oven mitt handy for handling those piping-hot statistical inferences.
So, without further ado, let's dissect this conundrum, armed with our wit, a hearty appetite for knowledge, and a keen eye for the unexpected. As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between lab coats and potential exploits in concealment, brace yourself for a whirlwind adventure that's as thrilling as a rollercoaster ride through a data set. After all, in the whimsical world of research, even the darkest correlations have their comedic silver linings.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." And as we navigate through this whimsical journey of discovery, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this academic escapade, complete with all the puns and statistical shenanigans one could wish for.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the underlying connections between the confounding variables of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body', we engaged in a data odyssey that would make Odysseus himself envious. Our research team's modus operandi involved an intricate dance of data extraction, manipulation, and statistical analysis, akin to a complex chemical reaction orchestrated with the precision of a molecular biologist. As the telltale signs of correlation began to emerge, we reveled in the statistical revelry with the exuberance of a lab technician who just discovered a new strain of bacteria.

The initial step of our methodology involved harvesting pertinent data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends. Our data-gathering expedition was more thorough than a bloodhound on a scent, ensuring that every morsel of information from the period between 2011 and 2021 was meticulously hoarded for analysis. With datasets in tow, we embarked on the exhilarating journey of data cleansing and preprocessing, ensuring that our statistical concoctions were devoid of any unsavory anomalies or outliers – weeding out the statistical rogue elements as diligently as a gardener tending to prized roses.

Having polished and pruned the datasets to perfection, we unleashed a barrage of statistical tools and techniques with the zeal of a wizard brandishing a magical wand. From simple descriptive statistics to the unyielding might of correlation analyses, we wielded these weapons of mathematical inquiry with the finesse of a grandmaster conducting a symphony. As we delved into the heart of the data, unearthing patterns and relationships that would make even Sherlock Holmes raise an eyebrow, we were swathed in the giddy delight of statistical exploration, akin to children frolicking in an empirical wonderland.

Drawing a bead on the correlation coefficient, we applied our statistical acumen to quantifying the strength and direction of the relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our findings elicited guffaws and eyebrow raises, for the correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 left us more staggered than a clumsily-injected participant in a pharmacological trial. And with a p-value of less than 0.01, the significance of this correlation had us more gobsmacked than a chemist witnessing an unexpected reaction in the laboratory.

In our relentless pursuit of uncovering and understanding this peculiar correlation, we acknowledge the limitations of our study. The whims of internet search queries and the multifaceted nature of educational pursuits may harbor bewildering confounding variables that elude even the most meticulous statistical sieves. Nonetheless, armed with the tools of statistical inference and a penchant for academic whimsy, we endeavored to shed light on this darkly comical correlation with the gusto of a stand-up comedian armed with a PowerPoint presentation.

To err is human, but to statistically analyze is divine. With the steady hand of data collection, the daring leaps of statistical analyses, and the irrepressible spirit of scientific inquiry, we basked in the triumphant glow of shedding light on a correlation as confounding as a dad joke at a science convention. As we ceremoniously conclude this methodology section, we impart the titular dad joke-worthy wisdom: "Parallel lines have so much in common. It’s a shame they’ll never meet."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8302876, r-squared of 0.6893775, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this rib-tickling study, we uncover the surprising relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our research team delved deep into data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, wielding statistical tools with more finesse than a surgeon's scalpel. We discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021, leaving us more impressed than a phlebotomist finding the perfect vein.

Unpacking this darkly comical correlation, our findings suggest that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded skyrocket, so do the Google searches for curious queries on concealment. Perhaps the potential culprits are seeking inspiration from the investigative techniques taught in these programs, or maybe it's just a case of too much CSI binge-watching. Nevertheless, our study adds a dash of humor and a dollop of insight to the previously uncharted territory of academic inquiry.

As a wise father once said, "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough."


-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the delightful dance of correlation and causation. One might say it's like trying to decipher whether the chicken or the egg came first - a mystery wrapped in an enigma, draped in a lab coat. In this electrifying round of academic sleuthing, we venture into the captivating interplay between educational trends and, let's say, less savory interests. As the old adage goes, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
The convergence of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the seemingly incongruous Google searches for 'how to hide a body' presents a puzzle more perplexing than an unsolvable cryptogram. One might wonder what leads individuals down the digital rabbit hole of such macabre inquiries, and how this correlated with educational pursuits that are typically associated with gallant, life-saving endeavors. If nothing else, this study aims to shed some light on this peculiar association, all the while stirring a cauldron of statistical intrigue and mirth.
Now, let's embark on this voyage of discovery with the buoyant enthusiasm of a buoyant force in fluid dynamics – but with a tad more gallows humor. As we dive into the empirical realms of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we must remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it certainly gives us more material for dinner party conversations than the standard pleasantries.
"You're not fully dressed until you sparkle," a wise statistician once mused. And as we shimmer in the glow of significance levels and confidence intervals, we aim to uncover the sparkling truth behind this peculiar nexus between academic pursuits and internet queries fit for a crime novel. Let's peel back the layers of this anomaly with the curiosity of a feline and the skepticism of a seasoned investigator, all while keeping an oven mitt handy for handling those piping-hot statistical inferences.
So, without further ado, let's dissect this conundrum, armed with our wit, a hearty appetite for knowledge, and a keen eye for the unexpected. As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between lab coats and potential exploits in concealment, brace yourself for a whirlwind adventure that's as thrilling as a rollercoaster ride through a data set. After all, in the whimsical world of research, even the darkest correlations have their comedic silver linings.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." And as we navigate through this whimsical journey of discovery, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this academic escapade, complete with all the puns and statistical shenanigans one could wish for.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our riveting analysis, we discovered a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 revealed a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables – a connection more surprising than finding a stethoscope at a crime scene.

Our findings indicate that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded increased, so did the Google searches for clandestine tips on concealing misdeeds. The r-squared value of 0.6893775 underscored the strength and significance of this relationship, leaving us more gobsmacked than a startled lab rat.

The p < 0.01 indicated that the probability of the observed correlation occurring by random chance is less than 1%, lending weight to our eyebrow-raising discovery. This chimes with the classic dad joke, "Did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut? He just needed a little space."

Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this peculiar correlation, showcasing a scatterplot that reveals a clear upward trend between the two variables. This figure is more eye-catching than a microscope slide with a splash of fluorescein dye.

At first blush, it might seem absurd that the pursuit of knowledge in clinical and medical laboratory science could be linked to such dark online inquiries. However, our research offers a peek into the enigmatic ways of human curiosity, wrapped in a cloak of statistical significance and chucklesome coincidences.

As the esteemed scientist Dr. Jekyll once pondered, "Why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? He wanted to win the No-bell prize!" Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also injects a dash of humor into the often somber world of academic inquiry. With our findings, we have peeled back the veil on this quirky correlation, proving that even in the world of esoteric research, there's always room for a good chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this rib-tickling study, we uncover the surprising relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our research team delved deep into data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, wielding statistical tools with more finesse than a surgeon's scalpel. We discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021, leaving us more impressed than a phlebotomist finding the perfect vein.

Unpacking this darkly comical correlation, our findings suggest that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded skyrocket, so do the Google searches for curious queries on concealment. Perhaps the potential culprits are seeking inspiration from the investigative techniques taught in these programs, or maybe it's just a case of too much CSI binge-watching. Nevertheless, our study adds a dash of humor and a dollop of insight to the previously uncharted territory of academic inquiry.

As a wise father once said, "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough."


[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science has shown a steady increase in recent years. Similarly, "Doe and Smith" unearth the growing popularity of online searches related to forensic laboratory techniques and practices. These serious and dignified works lay the scholarly foundation for our investigation into the intriguing correlation between these educational pursuits and the rather bizarre inquiries surfacing on the internet.
However, the plot thickens when we consider the curious connection between these seemingly disparate realms. "Jones" delves into the psychology of internet search behavior, shedding light on the motivations behind delving into the darker corners of cyberspace. Little did we know, this paper's findings would be spookier than a ghost in a laboratory.
Turning to non-fiction works, "Forensic Science: The Basics" and "Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science" offer profound insights into the world of forensic science, which might pique the interest of those seeking clandestine knowledge. On a lighter note, fictional titles such as "Gone Girl" and "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" add a touch of mystery and intrigue to our investigation. The authors would like to report that they are currently looking for "Clue: The Movie" in hopes of uncovering additional clues for the study.
As we navigate through this labyrinth of academic inquiry, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpected twists and turns that have emerged. There's a certain irony in the fact that those pursuing careers in Clinical/Medical Lab Science may also have a keen interest in queries related to the concealment of, dare we say, bodies. One thing is for certain – our research has sparked more curiosity than a cat in a library.
In "The Silence of the Lambs" and "Dexter," we find fictional portrayals of individuals with a profound understanding of human anatomy and a penchant for, shall we say, unconventional uses of their knowledge. These depictions offer a speculative layer to our investigation, one that's as intriguing as it is unsettling.
But fear not, dear reader – the gravity of our research does not escape us. We are fully aware that correlation does not imply causation, but we couldn't help but be tickled by the whimsical association we stumbled upon. After all, every good study needs a touch of levity, just like every good crime scene needs a keen investigator. And with that, we eagerly anticipate the sturdy feedback of our esteemed peers and the groans of delight at our puns.

[[RESULTS]]
In our riveting analysis, we discovered a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 revealed a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables – a connection more surprising than finding a stethoscope at a crime scene.
Our findings indicate that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded increased, so did the Google searches for clandestine tips on concealing misdeeds. The r-squared value of 0.6893775 underscored the strength and significance of this relationship, leaving us more gobsmacked than a startled lab rat.
The p < 0.01 indicated that the probability of the observed correlation occurring by random chance is less than 1%, lending weight to our eyebrow-raising discovery. This chimes with the classic dad joke, "Did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut? He just needed a little space."
Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this peculiar correlation, showcasing a scatterplot that reveals a clear upward trend between the two variables. This figure is more eye-catching than a microscope slide with a splash of fluorescein dye.
At first blush, it might seem absurd that the pursuit of knowledge in clinical and medical laboratory science could be linked to such dark online inquiries. However, our research offers a peek into the enigmatic ways of human curiosity, wrapped in a cloak of statistical significance and chucklesome coincidences.
As the esteemed scientist Dr. Jekyll once pondered, "Why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? He wanted to win the No-bell prize!" Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also injects a dash of humor into the often somber world of academic inquiry. With our findings, we have peeled back the veil on this quirky correlation, proving that even in the world of esoteric research, there's always room for a good chuckle.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have left us more bemused than a physicist at a comedy show. The robust correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body' supports the prior research conducted by Smith et al., Doe and Smith, and Jones. We were initially as skeptical as a chemist hearing a joke about sodium, but the data don't lie.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and the p < 0.01 are more reliable than a well-calibrated pipette. Our results echo the concerns raised in "Smith et al." about the increasing popularity of Clinical/Medical Lab Science degrees and the growing interest in forensic laboratory techniques, reflecting a connection as clear as a crisp microscope image. Perhaps the potential culprits are not just searching for hematology tips, but also for some devious inspiration on how to cover their tracks. It seems the study of blood samples has led to some people plotting "blood-curdling" searches.

The eerie connection between these variables may puzzle even the most seasoned statistician, but there's no denying its statistical significance. While causation cannot be definitively inferred from correlation, our research has brought to light a correlation more mysterious than a ghostly figure in a clinical laboratory. It's a good reminder that sometimes, correlations can be as surprising as discovering a skeleton in a lab closet.

The r-squared value of 0.6893775 reinforces the strength of this relationship, delivering a more impactful punch than a sparring match between epidemiologists. Our study offers a peek into the mysterious ways of human curiosity, revealing a correlation that's as stirring as the contents of an Erlenmeyer flask in a student's inexperienced hands.

Our findings add a whimsical layer to the scholarly discourse, injecting a lighthearted touch into the often sober arena of academic research. As the old adage goes, "When you get a bladder infection, urine trouble." Our results not only illuminate this unexpected relationship but also underscore the importance of approaching scientific inquiry with a level of humor and light-heartedness. After all, every good research paper needs a bit of levity, just like every good lab technician needs a reliable centrifuge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this rib-tickling study, we uncover the surprising relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our research team delved deep into data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, wielding statistical tools with more finesse than a surgeon's scalpel. We discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021, leaving us more impressed than a phlebotomist finding the perfect vein.

Unpacking this darkly comical correlation, our findings suggest that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded skyrocket, so do the Google searches for curious queries on concealment. Perhaps the potential culprits are seeking inspiration from the investigative techniques taught in these programs, or maybe it's just a case of too much CSI binge-watching. Nevertheless, our study adds a dash of humor and a dollop of insight to the previously uncharted territory of academic inquiry.

As a wise father once said, "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough."


[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance of correlation and causation. One might say it's like trying to decipher whether the chicken or the egg came first - a mystery wrapped in an enigma, draped in a lab coat. In this electrifying round of academic sleuthing, we venture into the captivating interplay between educational trends and, let's say, less savory interests. As the old adage goes, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug."
The convergence of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the seemingly incongruous Google searches for 'how to hide a body' presents a puzzle more perplexing than an unsolvable cryptogram. One might wonder what leads individuals down the digital rabbit hole of such macabre inquiries, and how this correlated with educational pursuits that are typically associated with gallant, life-saving endeavors. If nothing else, this study aims to shed some light on this peculiar association, all the while stirring a cauldron of statistical intrigue and mirth.
Now, let's embark on this voyage of discovery with the buoyant enthusiasm of a buoyant force in fluid dynamics – but with a tad more gallows humor. As we dive into the empirical realms of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we must remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it certainly gives us more material for dinner party conversations than the standard pleasantries.
"You're not fully dressed until you sparkle," a wise statistician once mused. And as we shimmer in the glow of significance levels and confidence intervals, we aim to uncover the sparkling truth behind this peculiar nexus between academic pursuits and internet queries fit for a crime novel. Let's peel back the layers of this anomaly with the curiosity of a feline and the skepticism of a seasoned investigator, all while keeping an oven mitt handy for handling those piping-hot statistical inferences.
So, without further ado, let's dissect this conundrum, armed with our wit, a hearty appetite for knowledge, and a keen eye for the unexpected. As we unravel the enigmatic relationship between lab coats and potential exploits in concealment, brace yourself for a whirlwind adventure that's as thrilling as a rollercoaster ride through a data set. After all, in the whimsical world of research, even the darkest correlations have their comedic silver linings.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana." And as we navigate through this whimsical journey of discovery, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this academic escapade, complete with all the puns and statistical shenanigans one could wish for.

[[RESULTS]]
In our riveting analysis, we discovered a striking correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 revealed a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables – a connection more surprising than finding a stethoscope at a crime scene.
Our findings indicate that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded increased, so did the Google searches for clandestine tips on concealing misdeeds. The r-squared value of 0.6893775 underscored the strength and significance of this relationship, leaving us more gobsmacked than a startled lab rat.
The p < 0.01 indicated that the probability of the observed correlation occurring by random chance is less than 1%, lending weight to our eyebrow-raising discovery. This chimes with the classic dad joke, "Did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut? He just needed a little space."
Fig. 1 visually encapsulates this peculiar correlation, showcasing a scatterplot that reveals a clear upward trend between the two variables. This figure is more eye-catching than a microscope slide with a splash of fluorescein dye.
At first blush, it might seem absurd that the pursuit of knowledge in clinical and medical laboratory science could be linked to such dark online inquiries. However, our research offers a peek into the enigmatic ways of human curiosity, wrapped in a cloak of statistical significance and chucklesome coincidences.
As the esteemed scientist Dr. Jekyll once pondered, "Why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? He wanted to win the No-bell prize!" Our study not only sheds light on this unexpected relationship but also injects a dash of humor into the often somber world of academic inquiry. With our findings, we have peeled back the veil on this quirky correlation, proving that even in the world of esoteric research, there's always room for a good chuckle.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the immortal words of Albert Einstein, "The only source of knowledge is experience." Through this research, we have experienced the chuckle-inducing conundrum of the relationship between Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our findings have left us as baffled as a scientist trying to find the missing part of the centrifuge. The connection between academic pursuits in the noble field of laboratory science and less-than-noble online inquiries is indeed a head-scratcher, but hey, that's what makes research so riveting.

We can confidently say that our results provide a fascinating peek into the syncopated rhythms of human curiosities, shedding light on the unexpected ways in which educational trends intersect with the darker corners of internet searches. Our findings are more unexpected than finding a microbiologist at a heavy metal concert - but hey, everyone needs a bit of excitement now and then!

In the spirit of academic inquiry, we believe that this study has not only added a touch of whimsy to the hallowed halls of scientific investigation but has also sparked curiosity about the myriad peculiarities that lurk within the labyrinthine pathways of data analysis.

So, in true dad joke fashion, we declare with unwavering conviction: "No more research is needed in this area; it's time to bury this connection once and for all!"

And as we bid adieu to this enthralling expedition of scientific inquiry, we leave you with a parting dad joke: "Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Criminal Quirks and Quandaries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Foundation for Investigative Psychiatry and Behavioral Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Criminology Confession: Associates Degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' with an abstract of In this rib-tickling study, we uncover the surprising relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/Medical Lab Science and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Our research team delved deep into data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, wielding statistical tools with more finesse than a surgeon's scalpel. We discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8302876 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2011 to 2021, leaving us more impressed than a phlebotomist finding the perfect vein.
Unpacking this darkly comical correlation, our findings suggest that as the number of Associates degrees in Clinical/Medical Lab Science awarded skyrocket, so do the Google searches for curious queries on concealment. Perhaps the potential culprits are seeking inspiration from the investigative techniques taught in these programs, or maybe it's just a case of too much CSI binge-watching. Nevertheless, our study adds a dash of humor and a dollop of insight to the previously uncharted territory of academic inquiry.
As a wise father once said, "I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough.

ChatGPT:

Associates degrees Clinical Lab Science, Medical Lab Science, Google searches "how to hide a body", correlation between degrees and search trends, National Center for Education Statistics, Google Trends, statistical tools, correlation coefficient, p-value, academic inquiry, dark humor in academia

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Clinical/medical lab science
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science

Google searches for 'how to hide a body'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to hide a body'

Correlation r = 0.8302876 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6893775 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to hide a body') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0016. 0.0015563775810287558000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 643 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.46, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science (Degrees awarded)28113240338735173143318630623051303731163527
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' (Rel. search volume)30.166751.416754.08338370.583343.666738.7536.416741.333356.583375.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2811,3240,3387,3517,3143,3186,3062,3051,3037,3116,3527,])
array_2 = np.array([30.1667,51.4167,54.0833,83,70.5833,43.6667,38.75,36.4167,41.3333,56.5833,75.25,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to hide a body'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2299 · Black Variable ID: 1232 · Red Variable ID: 1513
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0