about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,296 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'whatsapp' and the second variable is CRH plc's stock price (CRH).  The chart goes from 2010 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Employees were too busy sending messages to each other about work, inadvertently boosting productivity and ultimately leading to higher profits for the company.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image where a person is standing in a futuristic room, holding a smartphone and searching for "whatsapp" on Google. In the background, a large digital stock market ticker prominently displays CRH plc's stock price rising steadily. The room should have sleek, minimalist design elements with subtle lighting, giving it a futuristic and high-tech feel. The person should be dressed in modern, casual attire, and the smartphone should be sleek and futuristic-looking. Focus on creating a visually striking and cohesive futuristic scene that conveys the integration of technology and finance. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Cybernetic art 3D Pixar Style Psychedelic Futuristic
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a person is using their smartphone to search for "whatsapp" on Google, while in the background, a stock market ticker displays CRH plc's stock price rising steadily.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a person is using their smartphone to search for "whatsapp" on Google, while in the background, a stock market ticker displays CRH plc's stock price rising steadily. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image where a person is standing in a futuristic room, holding a smartphone and searching for "whatsapp" on Google. In the background, a large digital stock market ticker prominently displays CRH plc's stock price rising steadily. The room should have sleek, minimalist design elements with subtle lighting, giving it a futuristic and high-tech feel. The person should be dressed in modern, casual attire, and the smartphone should be sleek and futuristic-looking. Focus on creating a visually striking and cohesive futuristic scene that conveys the integration of technology and finance.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in whatsapp (Google searches for 'whatsapp') caused CRH plc's stock price (CRH) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?

The Journal of Social Media Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, our findings elucidate a substantial connection between the two variables.

It seems that the stock market is more connected to our daily tech habits than we thought. It's almost like the market wants to send a message, and that message is... well, 'WhatsApp'ing! Our results highlight a noteworthy link between the digital realm and stock performance, suggesting that online trends can indeed bear weight on financial markets. With these findings, we hope to encourage further investigation into the whimsical ways of the market, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated events can hold significant influence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, our findings elucidate a substantial connection between the two variables.

It seems that the stock market is more connected to our daily tech habits than we thought. It's almost like the market wants to send a message, and that message is... well, 'WhatsApp'ing! Our results highlight a noteworthy link between the digital realm and stock performance, suggesting that online trends can indeed bear weight on financial markets. With these findings, we hope to encourage further investigation into the whimsical ways of the market, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated events can hold significant influence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the ever-evolving landscape of financial markets, researchers have sought to unravel the enigmatic dance between seemingly disparate variables. We thumb through mountains of data, seeking to discern patterns and connections that sometimes seem more elusive than a cat chasing a laser pointer. As we grapple with the intricate interplay of digital trends and stock performance, it becomes clear that the market has a way of 'WhatsApp'ing us messages that we least expect – and perhaps, like a classic dad joke, it's all in good pun!

The rapid proliferation of communication technologies in recent years has transformed the way we connect, converse, and yes, even invest. Amidst this digital revolution, WhatsApp, with its ubiquity and unassuming green logo, has stealthily crept into the lexicon of everyday conversation and, as we shall uncover, the fluctuations of stock prices. It's like the market has taken a liking to WhatsApp, dipping its toes into the digital waters like a cautious swimmer testing the depth – or should we say 'depth of the market'?

Our study delves into the intersection of internet search behaviors and stock market dynamics, an unlikely pair akin to a scientist and a stand-up comedian walking into a laboratory – unexpected, perhaps, but not without its own brand of brilliance. As we meticulously examined Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price, we unearthed a correlation coefficient so high that it might just leave statisticians searching for their dropped jaw – 0.9043813, to be precise! It's almost as if these two variables are sending us a clear message, a message that spells out 'correlation' like a psychic medium spelling out 'your future' at a dimly lit séance.

Our exploration ventures beyond the numbers and graphs, embodying the spirit of curiosity that propels researchers forward – and sometimes, sideways, and occasionally in circles. As we navigate through these findings, we invite you to join us in this scientific waltz, where 'WhatsApp'ing becomes more than just a playful pun, but a revelation of the whimsical ways in which the digital world and financial markets intertwine.

So, grab your lab coats and your sense of humor; we're about to unravel a discovery that's one part mystery, one part statistical wizardry, and perhaps a generous sprinkle of serendipity. Remember, in the unpredictable realm of research, the unexpected is just waiting to knock on your door – but when it does, don't forget to ask, "Who's there?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, our findings elucidate a substantial connection between the two variables.

It seems that the stock market is more connected to our daily tech habits than we thought. It's almost like the market wants to send a message, and that message is... well, 'WhatsApp'ing! Our results highlight a noteworthy link between the digital realm and stock performance, suggesting that online trends can indeed bear weight on financial markets. With these findings, we hope to encourage further investigation into the whimsical ways of the market, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated events can hold significant influence.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of financial markets, researchers have sought to unravel the enigmatic dance between seemingly disparate variables. We thumb through mountains of data, seeking to discern patterns and connections that sometimes seem more elusive than a cat chasing a laser pointer. As we grapple with the intricate interplay of digital trends and stock performance, it becomes clear that the market has a way of 'WhatsApp'ing us messages that we least expect – and perhaps, like a classic dad joke, it's all in good pun!
The rapid proliferation of communication technologies in recent years has transformed the way we connect, converse, and yes, even invest. Amidst this digital revolution, WhatsApp, with its ubiquity and unassuming green logo, has stealthily crept into the lexicon of everyday conversation and, as we shall uncover, the fluctuations of stock prices. It's like the market has taken a liking to WhatsApp, dipping its toes into the digital waters like a cautious swimmer testing the depth – or should we say 'depth of the market'?
Our study delves into the intersection of internet search behaviors and stock market dynamics, an unlikely pair akin to a scientist and a stand-up comedian walking into a laboratory – unexpected, perhaps, but not without its own brand of brilliance. As we meticulously examined Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price, we unearthed a correlation coefficient so high that it might just leave statisticians searching for their dropped jaw – 0.9043813, to be precise! It's almost as if these two variables are sending us a clear message, a message that spells out 'correlation' like a psychic medium spelling out 'your future' at a dimly lit séance.
Our exploration ventures beyond the numbers and graphs, embodying the spirit of curiosity that propels researchers forward – and sometimes, sideways, and occasionally in circles. As we navigate through these findings, we invite you to join us in this scientific waltz, where 'WhatsApp'ing becomes more than just a playful pun, but a revelation of the whimsical ways in which the digital world and financial markets intertwine.
So, grab your lab coats and your sense of humor; we're about to unravel a discovery that's one part mystery, one part statistical wizardry, and perhaps a generous sprinkle of serendipity. Remember, in the unpredictable realm of research, the unexpected is just waiting to knock on your door – but when it does, don't forget to ask, "Who's there?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The intersection of digital trends and stock market performance has drawn the attention of researchers and traders alike. In "Digital Dynamics: Exploring the Links Between Online Activity and Financial Markets," Smith et al. delve into the fascinating relationship between online search behaviors and their impact on market dynamics. Similarly, Doe's analysis in "Cyber Sleuthing: Unraveling the Web of Stock Market Influences" sheds light on the subtle yet significant ways in which online trends interact with stock prices. These studies, much like a stock portfolio, construct a solid foundation for understanding the potential impact of digital phenomena on financial markets.

As we tiptoe further into this curious conundrum, let's not forget our trusty guidebooks to the world of finance and technology. "The Google Story" by David Vise and Mark Malseed provides insight into the rise of the eponymous search engine, while "Free Capital: How 12 Private Investors Made Millions in the Stock Market" by Guy Thomas uncovers the intricate workings of stock market success. These tomes, much like a seasoned investor's portfolio, offer diverse perspectives on the intersection of technology and stock markets.

Venturing into more enigmatic territory, the fictional realm also provides unexpected insights. In Philip K. Dick's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" and William Gibson's "Neuromancer," we encounter depictions of futuristic technologies that blur the line between the digital and the tangible, much like the elusive connection between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. These novels, like a speculative stock investment, invite us to explore the uncharted territories of human-technology interactions.

On a more contemporary note, social media platforms have become a playground for discussions on finance and technology. A tweet by @StockSavvySally asserts, "The correlation between 'WhatsApp' searches and CRH stock price is no LOL matter - it's serious business! #TechTrends #StocksAndSuch." Similarly, @FintechFanatic's post reads, "Who would've thought that a messaging app could influence stock prices? The market's always full of surprises! #MarketMysteries #WhatsAppWoes." These social media musings, like a lively stock exchange, offer a glimpse into the ongoing conversation surrounding the intersection of digital trends and stock performance.

In the spirit of interdisciplinary exploration, our literature review echoes the playful puns and unexpected twists that characterize the unpredictable journey of research. After all, when it comes to unraveling the multifaceted connections between online trends and stock market dynamics, a good sense of humor may just be the real stock in trade. And with that, we eagerly press on, ever ready to embrace the unexpected and, of course, the occasional dad joke. Because, let's face it, a little laughter can make even the most complex correlations a bit more bearable!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2010 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, our findings elucidate a substantial connection between the two variables.

It seems that the stock market is more connected to our daily tech habits than we thought. It's almost like the market wants to send a message, and that message is... well, 'WhatsApp'ing! Our results highlight a noteworthy link between the digital realm and stock performance, suggesting that online trends can indeed bear weight on financial markets. With these findings, we hope to encourage further investigation into the whimsical ways of the market, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated events can hold significant influence.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of financial markets, researchers have sought to unravel the enigmatic dance between seemingly disparate variables. We thumb through mountains of data, seeking to discern patterns and connections that sometimes seem more elusive than a cat chasing a laser pointer. As we grapple with the intricate interplay of digital trends and stock performance, it becomes clear that the market has a way of 'WhatsApp'ing us messages that we least expect – and perhaps, like a classic dad joke, it's all in good pun!
The rapid proliferation of communication technologies in recent years has transformed the way we connect, converse, and yes, even invest. Amidst this digital revolution, WhatsApp, with its ubiquity and unassuming green logo, has stealthily crept into the lexicon of everyday conversation and, as we shall uncover, the fluctuations of stock prices. It's like the market has taken a liking to WhatsApp, dipping its toes into the digital waters like a cautious swimmer testing the depth – or should we say 'depth of the market'?
Our study delves into the intersection of internet search behaviors and stock market dynamics, an unlikely pair akin to a scientist and a stand-up comedian walking into a laboratory – unexpected, perhaps, but not without its own brand of brilliance. As we meticulously examined Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price, we unearthed a correlation coefficient so high that it might just leave statisticians searching for their dropped jaw – 0.9043813, to be precise! It's almost as if these two variables are sending us a clear message, a message that spells out 'correlation' like a psychic medium spelling out 'your future' at a dimly lit séance.
Our exploration ventures beyond the numbers and graphs, embodying the spirit of curiosity that propels researchers forward – and sometimes, sideways, and occasionally in circles. As we navigate through these findings, we invite you to join us in this scientific waltz, where 'WhatsApp'ing becomes more than just a playful pun, but a revelation of the whimsical ways in which the digital world and financial markets intertwine.
So, grab your lab coats and your sense of humor; we're about to unravel a discovery that's one part mystery, one part statistical wizardry, and perhaps a generous sprinkle of serendipity. Remember, in the unpredictable realm of research, the unexpected is just waiting to knock on your door – but when it does, don't forget to ask, "Who's there?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price, our ragtag team of data detectives embarked on a thrilling quest for statistical truth--the kind of quest that might make Sherlock Holmes crack a smile or at least raise an eyebrow. Armed with data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we delved into the mystical world of numbers, armed with nothing but our trusty calculators and the occasional cup of strong coffee.

Our first order of business was to gather historical data on the frequency of Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price movements. We combed through virtual haystacks of data, analyzing weekly search volumes for 'WhatsApp' on Google Trends and daily stock price data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). It was like trying to solve a mystery in a library where the shelves are filled with nothing but detective novels and stock market almanacs.

Once we had our hands on the treasure trove of data, we took a leisurely stroll through the enchanting garden of statistics, stopping to smell the roses and occasionally getting pricked by the thorns of outliers and missing values. Equipped with statistical software that would make even a sorcerer envious, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the two variables. The suspense was palpable, like awaiting the punchline of a dad joke that you just know is coming but still manages to catch you off guard.

In our pursuit of clarity, we conducted a time series analysis to capture the dynamic relationship between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price over the period from 2010 to 2023. We carefully examined the ebb and flow of these two enigmatic variables, akin to watching a peculiar dance between a waltzing mathematician and a jittery stock trader.

Furthermore, we performed a Granger causality test to discern the direction of any potential causal relationship between the variables. It was a bit like playing detective in a game of Clue, trying to determine who did it – only in this case, it was "Who impacts whom?" Spoiler alert: it wasn't Colonel Mustard in the library with a candlestick.

As we ventured deeper into the labyrinth of statistical wizardry, we also conducted a regression analysis to explore the extent to which changes in Google searches for 'WhatsApp' could predict fluctuations in CRH plc's stock price. It was a bit like predicting the weather, except instead of rain or shine, our forecast involved stock market whims and digital chatter.

In the spirit of scientific transparency (and a touch of mischief), we accounted for potential confounding variables and performed robustness checks to ensure that our findings were as sturdy as a dad joke in a room full of groaning listeners.

And with a sprinkle of data visualization magic, we plotted eye-catching graphs that would make even the most skeptical of audiences take a second glance. Our graphs weren't just informative; they were the life of the data party, the ones with a knack for turning a dull equation into a fascinating narrative.

Ultimately, our methodology blended the precision of a chemist measuring precise amounts of reagents with the artistry of a wordsmith crafting an intricate pun. With our tools in hand and a lighthearted approach to unraveling the mysteries of statistical significance, we set the stage for a fascinating journey into the unexpected connections between online search trends and the turbulent tides of the stock market.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2010 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9043813, r-squared of 0.8179056, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, our findings elucidate a substantial connection between the two variables.

It seems that the stock market is more connected to our daily tech habits than we thought. It's almost like the market wants to send a message, and that message is... well, 'WhatsApp'ing! Our results highlight a noteworthy link between the digital realm and stock performance, suggesting that online trends can indeed bear weight on financial markets. With these findings, we hope to encourage further investigation into the whimsical ways of the market, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated events can hold significant influence.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of financial markets, researchers have sought to unravel the enigmatic dance between seemingly disparate variables. We thumb through mountains of data, seeking to discern patterns and connections that sometimes seem more elusive than a cat chasing a laser pointer. As we grapple with the intricate interplay of digital trends and stock performance, it becomes clear that the market has a way of 'WhatsApp'ing us messages that we least expect – and perhaps, like a classic dad joke, it's all in good pun!
The rapid proliferation of communication technologies in recent years has transformed the way we connect, converse, and yes, even invest. Amidst this digital revolution, WhatsApp, with its ubiquity and unassuming green logo, has stealthily crept into the lexicon of everyday conversation and, as we shall uncover, the fluctuations of stock prices. It's like the market has taken a liking to WhatsApp, dipping its toes into the digital waters like a cautious swimmer testing the depth – or should we say 'depth of the market'?
Our study delves into the intersection of internet search behaviors and stock market dynamics, an unlikely pair akin to a scientist and a stand-up comedian walking into a laboratory – unexpected, perhaps, but not without its own brand of brilliance. As we meticulously examined Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price, we unearthed a correlation coefficient so high that it might just leave statisticians searching for their dropped jaw – 0.9043813, to be precise! It's almost as if these two variables are sending us a clear message, a message that spells out 'correlation' like a psychic medium spelling out 'your future' at a dimly lit séance.
Our exploration ventures beyond the numbers and graphs, embodying the spirit of curiosity that propels researchers forward – and sometimes, sideways, and occasionally in circles. As we navigate through these findings, we invite you to join us in this scientific waltz, where 'WhatsApp'ing becomes more than just a playful pun, but a revelation of the whimsical ways in which the digital world and financial markets intertwine.
So, grab your lab coats and your sense of humor; we're about to unravel a discovery that's one part mystery, one part statistical wizardry, and perhaps a generous sprinkle of serendipity. Remember, in the unpredictable realm of research, the unexpected is just waiting to knock on your door – but when it does, don't forget to ask, "Who's there?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the relationship between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price has yielded intriguing insights. Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.9043813 between the two variables for the period from 2010 to 2023. This correlation indicates a robust and consistent association, almost like a pair of inseparable partners in a meticulous statistical dance.

Fig. 1 illustrates the unmistakable relationship between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. It's like they're engaged in a lively tango, with each step echoing the pulsating rhythm of the financial market. And just like a well-executed dad joke, the correlation between these variables is undeniable – it'll have you nodding your head and saying, "Well, that certainly adds up!"

The r-squared value of 0.8179056 further underscores the substantial influence of 'WhatsApp' searches on CRH plc's stock price. It's as if the digital world has found its way into the stock market's heart, whispering sweet statistical nothings that resonate far beyond the confines of conventional wisdom. These results emphasize the significance of online search behaviors in determining stock performance, shedding light on a connection that's as tangible as a well-received punchline.

Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of the relationship between 'WhatsApp' searches and CRH plc's stock price hits home like a punchline that lands perfectly – it's just impossible to ignore! This finding reinforces the notion that digital trends can exert a notable impact on financial markets, akin to a punchy one-liner that lingers in the mind long after it's been uttered.

In summary, our investigation into the interplay between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price has uncovered a compelling correlation, underlining the profound influence of online search trends on stock performance. This connection is not just statistically robust; it's also a poignant reminder that within the labyrinth of financial markets, the unexpected – much like a well-timed dad joke – often holds the key to unraveling intricate complexities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, our findings elucidate a substantial connection between the two variables.

It seems that the stock market is more connected to our daily tech habits than we thought. It's almost like the market wants to send a message, and that message is... well, 'WhatsApp'ing! Our results highlight a noteworthy link between the digital realm and stock performance, suggesting that online trends can indeed bear weight on financial markets. With these findings, we hope to encourage further investigation into the whimsical ways of the market, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated events can hold significant influence.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The intersection of digital trends and stock market performance has drawn the attention of researchers and traders alike. In "Digital Dynamics: Exploring the Links Between Online Activity and Financial Markets," Smith et al. delve into the fascinating relationship between online search behaviors and their impact on market dynamics. Similarly, Doe's analysis in "Cyber Sleuthing: Unraveling the Web of Stock Market Influences" sheds light on the subtle yet significant ways in which online trends interact with stock prices. These studies, much like a stock portfolio, construct a solid foundation for understanding the potential impact of digital phenomena on financial markets.
As we tiptoe further into this curious conundrum, let's not forget our trusty guidebooks to the world of finance and technology. "The Google Story" by David Vise and Mark Malseed provides insight into the rise of the eponymous search engine, while "Free Capital: How 12 Private Investors Made Millions in the Stock Market" by Guy Thomas uncovers the intricate workings of stock market success. These tomes, much like a seasoned investor's portfolio, offer diverse perspectives on the intersection of technology and stock markets.
Venturing into more enigmatic territory, the fictional realm also provides unexpected insights. In Philip K. Dick's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" and William Gibson's "Neuromancer," we encounter depictions of futuristic technologies that blur the line between the digital and the tangible, much like the elusive connection between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. These novels, like a speculative stock investment, invite us to explore the uncharted territories of human-technology interactions.
On a more contemporary note, social media platforms have become a playground for discussions on finance and technology. A tweet by @StockSavvySally asserts, "The correlation between 'WhatsApp' searches and CRH stock price is no LOL matter - it's serious business! #TechTrends #StocksAndSuch." Similarly, @FintechFanatic's post reads, "Who would've thought that a messaging app could influence stock prices? The market's always full of surprises! #MarketMysteries #WhatsAppWoes." These social media musings, like a lively stock exchange, offer a glimpse into the ongoing conversation surrounding the intersection of digital trends and stock performance.
In the spirit of interdisciplinary exploration, our literature review echoes the playful puns and unexpected twists that characterize the unpredictable journey of research. After all, when it comes to unraveling the multifaceted connections between online trends and stock market dynamics, a good sense of humor may just be the real stock in trade. And with that, we eagerly press on, ever ready to embrace the unexpected and, of course, the occasional dad joke. Because, let's face it, a little laughter can make even the most complex correlations a bit more bearable!

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the relationship between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price has yielded intriguing insights. Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.9043813 between the two variables for the period from 2010 to 2023. This correlation indicates a robust and consistent association, almost like a pair of inseparable partners in a meticulous statistical dance.
Fig. 1 illustrates the unmistakable relationship between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. It's like they're engaged in a lively tango, with each step echoing the pulsating rhythm of the financial market. And just like a well-executed dad joke, the correlation between these variables is undeniable – it'll have you nodding your head and saying, "Well, that certainly adds up!"
The r-squared value of 0.8179056 further underscores the substantial influence of 'WhatsApp' searches on CRH plc's stock price. It's as if the digital world has found its way into the stock market's heart, whispering sweet statistical nothings that resonate far beyond the confines of conventional wisdom. These results emphasize the significance of online search behaviors in determining stock performance, shedding light on a connection that's as tangible as a well-received punchline.
Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of the relationship between 'WhatsApp' searches and CRH plc's stock price hits home like a punchline that lands perfectly – it's just impossible to ignore! This finding reinforces the notion that digital trends can exert a notable impact on financial markets, akin to a punchy one-liner that lingers in the mind long after it's been uttered.
In summary, our investigation into the interplay between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price has uncovered a compelling correlation, underlining the profound influence of online search trends on stock performance. This connection is not just statistically robust; it's also a poignant reminder that within the labyrinth of financial markets, the unexpected – much like a well-timed dad joke – often holds the key to unraveling intricate complexities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Even though it might seem like we're working with virtual chit-chat, our findings suggest that there's some serious stock business going on behind all those 'WhatsApp' searches. The robust correlation we uncovered between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price reaffirms the potential influence of digital phenomena on financial markets. It's like the stock market decided to join the social media bandwagon and message us directly - "Hey, pay attention to this!"

Our results stand in harmony with prior research by Smith et al. and Doe, providing empirical evidence that online search behaviors can indeed sway stock prices. It's almost as if the stock market is eagerly awaiting the latest digital trends, like a dad at a dad joke convention eagerly waiting to hear some cheesy puns. This alignment with previous studies solidifies the notion that the digital sphere can't be ignored in its impact on market dynamics.

The quirky connections found in Philip K. Dick's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" and William Gibson's "Neuromancer" might have seemed far-fetched at first, but our study reflects that sometimes truth can be as strange as fiction. As we traverse the enigmatic realms of research, it's crucial to consider all possibilities, even if they appear as unlikely as a scientist needing an umbrella in the lab.

Our results not only underscore the statistical significance of the 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc stock price relationship but also emphasize the ever-present element of surprise in financial markets. Just like a good dad joke, the unexpected connections in the world of finance and technology have a way of leaving an enduring impression. So, the next time someone tells you that online search trends can't move stock prices, remind them that in the realm of statistics, there's always a punchline waiting to shake things up.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'whatsapp' and CRH plc's stock price (CRH). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, our findings elucidate a substantial connection between the two variables.

It seems that the stock market is more connected to our daily tech habits than we thought. It's almost like the market wants to send a message, and that message is... well, 'WhatsApp'ing! Our results highlight a noteworthy link between the digital realm and stock performance, suggesting that online trends can indeed bear weight on financial markets. With these findings, we hope to encourage further investigation into the whimsical ways of the market, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated events can hold significant influence.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of financial markets, researchers have sought to unravel the enigmatic dance between seemingly disparate variables. We thumb through mountains of data, seeking to discern patterns and connections that sometimes seem more elusive than a cat chasing a laser pointer. As we grapple with the intricate interplay of digital trends and stock performance, it becomes clear that the market has a way of 'WhatsApp'ing us messages that we least expect – and perhaps, like a classic dad joke, it's all in good pun!
The rapid proliferation of communication technologies in recent years has transformed the way we connect, converse, and yes, even invest. Amidst this digital revolution, WhatsApp, with its ubiquity and unassuming green logo, has stealthily crept into the lexicon of everyday conversation and, as we shall uncover, the fluctuations of stock prices. It's like the market has taken a liking to WhatsApp, dipping its toes into the digital waters like a cautious swimmer testing the depth – or should we say 'depth of the market'?
Our study delves into the intersection of internet search behaviors and stock market dynamics, an unlikely pair akin to a scientist and a stand-up comedian walking into a laboratory – unexpected, perhaps, but not without its own brand of brilliance. As we meticulously examined Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price, we unearthed a correlation coefficient so high that it might just leave statisticians searching for their dropped jaw – 0.9043813, to be precise! It's almost as if these two variables are sending us a clear message, a message that spells out 'correlation' like a psychic medium spelling out 'your future' at a dimly lit séance.
Our exploration ventures beyond the numbers and graphs, embodying the spirit of curiosity that propels researchers forward – and sometimes, sideways, and occasionally in circles. As we navigate through these findings, we invite you to join us in this scientific waltz, where 'WhatsApp'ing becomes more than just a playful pun, but a revelation of the whimsical ways in which the digital world and financial markets intertwine.
So, grab your lab coats and your sense of humor; we're about to unravel a discovery that's one part mystery, one part statistical wizardry, and perhaps a generous sprinkle of serendipity. Remember, in the unpredictable realm of research, the unexpected is just waiting to knock on your door – but when it does, don't forget to ask, "Who's there?"

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the relationship between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price has yielded intriguing insights. Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation of 0.9043813 between the two variables for the period from 2010 to 2023. This correlation indicates a robust and consistent association, almost like a pair of inseparable partners in a meticulous statistical dance.
Fig. 1 illustrates the unmistakable relationship between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. It's like they're engaged in a lively tango, with each step echoing the pulsating rhythm of the financial market. And just like a well-executed dad joke, the correlation between these variables is undeniable – it'll have you nodding your head and saying, "Well, that certainly adds up!"
The r-squared value of 0.8179056 further underscores the substantial influence of 'WhatsApp' searches on CRH plc's stock price. It's as if the digital world has found its way into the stock market's heart, whispering sweet statistical nothings that resonate far beyond the confines of conventional wisdom. These results emphasize the significance of online search behaviors in determining stock performance, shedding light on a connection that's as tangible as a well-received punchline.
Moreover, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of the relationship between 'WhatsApp' searches and CRH plc's stock price hits home like a punchline that lands perfectly – it's just impossible to ignore! This finding reinforces the notion that digital trends can exert a notable impact on financial markets, akin to a punchy one-liner that lingers in the mind long after it's been uttered.
In summary, our investigation into the interplay between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price has uncovered a compelling correlation, underlining the profound influence of online search trends on stock performance. This connection is not just statistically robust; it's also a poignant reminder that within the labyrinth of financial markets, the unexpected – much like a well-timed dad joke – often holds the key to unraveling intricate complexities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In culmination, our study has hilariously uncovered a strong linkage between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price, as though they were performing a perfectly synchronized statistical comedy routine. The correlation coefficient of 0.9043813, akin to a perfectly-timed punchline, underscores the robust association between these variables, leaving no room for doubt – but plenty of room for a good laugh!

As we dive deeper into the whimsical world of statistical interplay, it becomes evident that this connection has the potential to make market analysts exclaim, "What's up with 'WhatsApp'?" And the answer – a hilarious correlation with CRH plc's stock price! It's like the market is sending us a comical message through our search queries, challenging traditional notions of market influence in a way that would make even the most seasoned economist crack a smile.

The r-squared value of 0.8179056 adds to the compelling evidence, reinforcing the idea that 'WhatsApp' searches and stock prices are engaged in a captivating statistical waltz, with the digital world leading our understanding of market dynamics like a seasoned dance instructor. It's a reminder that in the colorful world of statistical research, even the most unexpected pairings – much like a dad joke at a scientific conference – can hold surprising significance.

Therefore, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. The evidence is clear – the correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price is as solid as a well-constructed pun. It seems that 'WhatsApp' truly does wield considerable weight on CRH plc's stock price, proving that in the arena of finance and digital trends, the unexpected can often take center stage and leave us grinning from ear to ear.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Social Media Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Digital Communication and Social Influence Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled WhatsApp Woes: Will Waggish Web Searches Wield Weight on CRH's Stock Price? with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the curious correlation between Google searches for 'WhatsApp' and CRH plc's stock price. Our research team utilized data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Unearthing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043813 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2023, our findings elucidate a substantial connection between the two variables.
It seems that the stock market is more connected to our daily tech habits than we thought. It's almost like the market wants to send a message, and that message is... well, 'WhatsApp'ing! Our results highlight a noteworthy link between the digital realm and stock performance, suggesting that online trends can indeed bear weight on financial markets. With these findings, we hope to encourage further investigation into the whimsical ways of the market, reminding us that even the most seemingly unrelated events can hold significant influence.

ChatGPT:

WhatsApp, CRH plc, stock price, Google Trends, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, stock market, tech habits, online trends, financial markets, digital realm, stock performance, market influence.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'whatsapp'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'whatsapp' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'whatsapp'

CRH plc's stock price (CRH)
Detailed data title: Opening price of CRH plc (CRH) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with CRH plc's stock price (CRH)

Correlation r = 0.9043813 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8179056 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., CRH plc's stock price (CRH)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'whatsapp') over the 14 years from 2010 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.0E-6. 0.0000089547655222623060000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.0009% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 111,672 random variables You don't actually need 111 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'whatsapp' (Rel. search volume)125.9166711.666719.526.6667273033.7537.083364.580.916790.166791.3333
CRH plc's stock price (CRH) (Stock price)27.9421.0320.2621.0325.4923.9528.2634.0136.0326.0340.8743.5753.0441.35




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,2,5.91667,11.6667,19.5,26.6667,27,30,33.75,37.0833,64.5,80.9167,90.1667,91.3333,])
array_2 = np.array([27.94,21.03,20.26,21.03,25.49,23.95,28.26,34.01,36.03,26.03,40.87,43.57,53.04,41.35,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'whatsapp'"
array_2_name = "CRH plc's stock price (CRH)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 2296 · Black Variable ID: 1478 · Red Variable ID: 1780
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0