about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,285 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of transit police in Texas and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to do magic'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Without transit police around, there were fewer people to saw in half during their magic acts, leading to a decline in interest in magic tricks and illusions. Guess the real disappearing act is the interest in magic!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' with the following scene: In a bustling Texas train station, a transit police officer stands guard on the platform, surrounded by a group of excited onlookers. In the center, a street magician captivates the crowd with mesmerizing tricks. The officer's presence brings a feeling of security, while the magic show creates an atmosphere of wonder and excitement. The scene is lit by the warm glow of the station lights, adding depth and intrigue to the setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Voxel art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Texas train station, a transit police officer keeps a watchful eye on the platform while a group of excited onlookers gather around a street magician performing mesmerizing tricks. The officer's presence ensures the safety of the commuters while the crowd is captivated by the magic show, creating a vibrant atmosphere blending security and wonder.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Texas train station, a transit police officer keeps a watchful eye on the platform while a group of excited onlookers gather around a street magician performing mesmerizing tricks. The officer's presence ensures the safety of the commuters while the crowd is captivated by the magic show, creating a vibrant atmosphere blending security and wonder. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' with the following scene: In a bustling Texas train station, a transit police officer stands guard on the platform, surrounded by a group of excited onlookers. In the center, a street magician captivates the crowd with mesmerizing tricks. The officer's presence brings a feeling of security, while the magic show creates an atmosphere of wonder and excitement. The scene is lit by the warm glow of the station lights, adding depth and intrigue to the setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of transit police in Texas caused how to do magic (Google searches for 'how to do magic') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'

Journal of Transportation and Enchantment Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8366283 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between the number of transit police in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Utilizing Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data from 2004 to 2021, our research team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with statistical significance at p < 0.01. As we embark on this mystical journey of data exploration, we unravel the enigmatic intertwining of public transit security and the allure of magic. Our findings not only shed light on the uncharted territories of transit policing but also offer a captivating glimpse into the whimsical world of wonder and illusion. So, join us as we unravel this spellbinding correlation and demonstrate that when it comes to public transit and magic, the results are nothing short of spellbinding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between the number of transit police in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Utilizing Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data from 2004 to 2021, our research team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with statistical significance at p < 0.01. As we embark on this mystical journey of data exploration, we unravel the enigmatic intertwining of public transit security and the allure of magic. Our findings not only shed light on the uncharted territories of transit policing but also offer a captivating glimpse into the whimsical world of wonder and illusion. So, join us as we unravel this spellbinding correlation and demonstrate that when it comes to public transit and magic, the results are nothing short of spellbinding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricate web of interconnections within various societal phenomena, oftentimes stumbling upon unexpected and whimsical relationships. One such seemingly improbable association that piqued our interest is the juxtaposition of transit police numbers in Texas and the trending curiosity for sorcery and sleight of hand, as evidenced by Google searches for 'how to do magic'.

While transit police traditionally focus on maintaining security and order within public transit systems, the notion of their influence extending to the mystical realm of prestidigitation might initially appear as an illusory endeavor. However, as we delved into this enigmatic correlation, it became increasingly apparent that there might be more than meets the eye – or wand, in this case.

The objective of this study is to rigorously examine the statistical relationship between the number of transit police in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic', with the aim of elucidating potential underlying factors that may contribute to this enthralling synergy. Through the meticulous analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data on transit police employment and Google Trends data reflecting public interest in magic-related tutorials over the period from 2004 to 2021, we endeavor to unravel the spellbinding bond between public transit security and the allure of magic.

As we embark on this captivating expedition, we anticipate that our findings will not only introduce a new dimension to the discourse on transit policing but also add a touch of enchantment to the realm of empirical research. Our inquiry seeks to assert that, while the practice of magic may thrive on secrecy and misdirection, its correlation with transit policing is an open and intriguing puzzle that begs to be solved. So, grab your wands – or data visualization tools – and join us on this curious exploration as we attempt to make sense of this unexpected yet undeniably bewitching connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between the number of transit police in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Utilizing Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data from 2004 to 2021, our research team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with statistical significance at p < 0.01. As we embark on this mystical journey of data exploration, we unravel the enigmatic intertwining of public transit security and the allure of magic. Our findings not only shed light on the uncharted territories of transit policing but also offer a captivating glimpse into the whimsical world of wonder and illusion. So, join us as we unravel this spellbinding correlation and demonstrate that when it comes to public transit and magic, the results are nothing short of spellbinding.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricate web of interconnections within various societal phenomena, oftentimes stumbling upon unexpected and whimsical relationships. One such seemingly improbable association that piqued our interest is the juxtaposition of transit police numbers in Texas and the trending curiosity for sorcery and sleight of hand, as evidenced by Google searches for 'how to do magic'.
While transit police traditionally focus on maintaining security and order within public transit systems, the notion of their influence extending to the mystical realm of prestidigitation might initially appear as an illusory endeavor. However, as we delved into this enigmatic correlation, it became increasingly apparent that there might be more than meets the eye – or wand, in this case.
The objective of this study is to rigorously examine the statistical relationship between the number of transit police in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic', with the aim of elucidating potential underlying factors that may contribute to this enthralling synergy. Through the meticulous analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data on transit police employment and Google Trends data reflecting public interest in magic-related tutorials over the period from 2004 to 2021, we endeavor to unravel the spellbinding bond between public transit security and the allure of magic.
As we embark on this captivating expedition, we anticipate that our findings will not only introduce a new dimension to the discourse on transit policing but also add a touch of enchantment to the realm of empirical research. Our inquiry seeks to assert that, while the practice of magic may thrive on secrecy and misdirection, its correlation with transit policing is an open and intriguing puzzle that begs to be solved. So, grab your wands – or data visualization tools – and join us on this curious exploration as we attempt to make sense of this unexpected yet undeniably bewitching connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al. (2015)", the authors find that the number of transit police in urban areas is positively correlated with crime rates, suggesting a potential deterrent effect of law enforcement presence on public transit systems. Meanwhile, "Doe and Jones (2018)" highlight the importance of public perception and sense of security in shaping individuals' decision to utilize public transportation, thereby emphasizing the significance of transit police in fostering a safe and welcoming environment for commuters.

However, as we venture deeper into this curious inquiry, we are compelled to acknowledge the less conventional avenues of investigation that have captured our attention. While the correlation between transit police numbers and crime rates is a well-trodden path in empirical research, our exploration extends into a realm where skepticism may lurk – the enchanting world of magic.

Turning the pages of "The Secret History of Magic" by Peter Lamont and Jim Steinmeyer, we are reminded of the timeless appeal of illusion and the enduring fascination with the mystical arts. In a less conventional light, "The Prestige" by Christopher Priest introduces us to the dramatic intertwining of rivalry and magic, underscoring the captivating allure that magic holds over the human imagination.

Moreover, our investigations have led us down cinematic avenues, where we have found ourselves captivated by the spirited performances in "Now You See Me" and its sequel "Now You See Me 2". While these films may appear merely as entertainment, they offer glimpses of the spellbinding world of magic and illusion, igniting our curiosity as we endeavor to connect these fantastical narratives to the statistical underpinnings of transit police numbers and Google searches for 'how to do magic'.

In "Whimsical Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of Magic and Metropolis" (2020), the authors delved into the nuanced patterns of Google searches related to magic tricks and performances in urban settings, laying the groundwork for our current exploration into the enigmatic synchronization between public transit security and the allure of magic. While the intersection of statistics and sorcery may raise eyebrows, our findings endeavor to dispel doubts and illuminate the unexpected interplay between seemingly disparate elements.

As we progress through this whimsical journey of data discovery, we are reminded that while statistical significance may cloak our findings in a veneer of rigor, there is always a touch of magic hidden within every correlation coefficient. So, with a wave of our statistical wands, we embark on this mystical quest, determined to unravel the secrets that lie at the crossroads of transit policing and the captivating allure of magic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between the number of transit police in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Utilizing Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data from 2004 to 2021, our research team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with statistical significance at p < 0.01. As we embark on this mystical journey of data exploration, we unravel the enigmatic intertwining of public transit security and the allure of magic. Our findings not only shed light on the uncharted territories of transit policing but also offer a captivating glimpse into the whimsical world of wonder and illusion. So, join us as we unravel this spellbinding correlation and demonstrate that when it comes to public transit and magic, the results are nothing short of spellbinding.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricate web of interconnections within various societal phenomena, oftentimes stumbling upon unexpected and whimsical relationships. One such seemingly improbable association that piqued our interest is the juxtaposition of transit police numbers in Texas and the trending curiosity for sorcery and sleight of hand, as evidenced by Google searches for 'how to do magic'.
While transit police traditionally focus on maintaining security and order within public transit systems, the notion of their influence extending to the mystical realm of prestidigitation might initially appear as an illusory endeavor. However, as we delved into this enigmatic correlation, it became increasingly apparent that there might be more than meets the eye – or wand, in this case.
The objective of this study is to rigorously examine the statistical relationship between the number of transit police in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic', with the aim of elucidating potential underlying factors that may contribute to this enthralling synergy. Through the meticulous analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data on transit police employment and Google Trends data reflecting public interest in magic-related tutorials over the period from 2004 to 2021, we endeavor to unravel the spellbinding bond between public transit security and the allure of magic.
As we embark on this captivating expedition, we anticipate that our findings will not only introduce a new dimension to the discourse on transit policing but also add a touch of enchantment to the realm of empirical research. Our inquiry seeks to assert that, while the practice of magic may thrive on secrecy and misdirection, its correlation with transit policing is an open and intriguing puzzle that begs to be solved. So, grab your wands – or data visualization tools – and join us on this curious exploration as we attempt to make sense of this unexpected yet undeniably bewitching connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystical connection between the number of transit police in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic', our research team employed a combination of quantitative analyses and data mining techniques. The data utilized for this study were primarily sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, encompassing a time frame spanning from 2004 to 2021. The utilization of these data sources allowed for a comprehensive and extensive investigation into the enigmatic relationship between transit policing and the enchanting allure of magic.

Our initial steps involved wrangling and harmonizing the data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which cataloged the employment figures for transit police in Texas over the specified time period. Through meticulous data cleansing and verification procedures, we ensured the accuracy and reliability of the employment statistics, endeavoring to eliminate any potential "tricks" or illusory fluctuations in the dataset.

Furthermore, the utilization of Google Trends data provided insight into the ebb and flow of public interest in magic-related tutorials, as inferred from the frequency of searches for 'how to do magic'. Employing custom time range filters and geographical specifications, we focused our lens on Texas-based search trends, aiming to capture the essence of the state's fascination with the art of legerdemain.

Subsequently, employing advanced statistical techniques, including correlation analyses and time series modeling, we sought to uncover and decipher the underlying patterns and trends within the collected datasets. Through the application of sophisticated algorithms and modeling approaches, we endeavored to illuminate the enthralling correlation between transit police numbers and the waxing and waning interest in magic tutorials.

Furthermore, to mitigate any potential confounding variables or extraneous influences, we conducted robust sensitivity analyses and employed control variables, including demographic and socio-economic indicators, to ascertain the robustness of the observed relationship. This rigorous approach allowed us to distill the essence of the correlation, akin to untangling a complex magic trick to reveal its captivating mechanics.

In summary, our methodology unfolds as a fascinating journey, where data manipulation, statistical wizardry, and analytical acumen converge to illuminate the cryptic bond between transit policing and the enduring charm of magic. As we venture forth, the next section presents our enthralling findings, unveiling a correlation that, much like a well-crafted illusion, captures the imagination and provokes curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8366283, r-squared of 0.6999469, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between the number of transit police in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Utilizing Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data from 2004 to 2021, our research team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with statistical significance at p < 0.01. As we embark on this mystical journey of data exploration, we unravel the enigmatic intertwining of public transit security and the allure of magic. Our findings not only shed light on the uncharted territories of transit policing but also offer a captivating glimpse into the whimsical world of wonder and illusion. So, join us as we unravel this spellbinding correlation and demonstrate that when it comes to public transit and magic, the results are nothing short of spellbinding.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricate web of interconnections within various societal phenomena, oftentimes stumbling upon unexpected and whimsical relationships. One such seemingly improbable association that piqued our interest is the juxtaposition of transit police numbers in Texas and the trending curiosity for sorcery and sleight of hand, as evidenced by Google searches for 'how to do magic'.
While transit police traditionally focus on maintaining security and order within public transit systems, the notion of their influence extending to the mystical realm of prestidigitation might initially appear as an illusory endeavor. However, as we delved into this enigmatic correlation, it became increasingly apparent that there might be more than meets the eye – or wand, in this case.
The objective of this study is to rigorously examine the statistical relationship between the number of transit police in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic', with the aim of elucidating potential underlying factors that may contribute to this enthralling synergy. Through the meticulous analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data on transit police employment and Google Trends data reflecting public interest in magic-related tutorials over the period from 2004 to 2021, we endeavor to unravel the spellbinding bond between public transit security and the allure of magic.
As we embark on this captivating expedition, we anticipate that our findings will not only introduce a new dimension to the discourse on transit policing but also add a touch of enchantment to the realm of empirical research. Our inquiry seeks to assert that, while the practice of magic may thrive on secrecy and misdirection, its correlation with transit policing is an open and intriguing puzzle that begs to be solved. So, grab your wands – or data visualization tools – and join us on this curious exploration as we attempt to make sense of this unexpected yet undeniably bewitching connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic' revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation. For the time period spanning from 2004 to 2021, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with an r-squared value of 0.6999469, indicating that approximately 70% of the variability in magic-related search queries can be explained by the number of transit police in Texas. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this correlation, warranting further examination of this intriguing alliance.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicting the relationship between transit police numbers and Google searches for 'how to do magic' showcases a striking upward trend, affirming the enchanting connection between these seemingly disparate variables. The data points coalesce to form a captivating pattern, likened to the unfolding of a mesmerizing illusion, drawing attention to the compelling association between public transit security and the quest for magical knowledge.

The unprecedented strength of this correlation not only underscores the statistical significance but also prompts contemplation on the underlying mechanisms at play. While causation cannot be inferred from correlation alone, the magnitude of this association warrants further exploration to unveil the mystical forces intertwining transit policing and the allure of magic.

Our findings not only contribute to the discourse on public transit security but also offer an intriguing perspective on the transcendent appeal of magic in contemporary society. As we peel back the layers of this mesmerizing correlation, it becomes evident that the enchantment of the mystical arts may extend beyond the realm of entertainment, transcending into the intricacies of everyday life – or perhaps into the alluring realm of public transit security.

In conclusion, our study illuminates a captivating nexus between the number of transit police in Texas and the public's fascination with magic, unveiling an enchanting correlation that invites further exploration. Our findings not only showcase the allure of empirical research but also lend an unexpected touch of magic to the often-serious sphere of statistical analysis. Thus, as we continue to unravel the enigma of this correlation, we remain spellbound by the mystical interplay between transit policing and the captivating world of magic.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between the number of transit police in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Utilizing Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data from 2004 to 2021, our research team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with statistical significance at p < 0.01. As we embark on this mystical journey of data exploration, we unravel the enigmatic intertwining of public transit security and the allure of magic. Our findings not only shed light on the uncharted territories of transit policing but also offer a captivating glimpse into the whimsical world of wonder and illusion. So, join us as we unravel this spellbinding correlation and demonstrate that when it comes to public transit and magic, the results are nothing short of spellbinding.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al. (2015)", the authors find that the number of transit police in urban areas is positively correlated with crime rates, suggesting a potential deterrent effect of law enforcement presence on public transit systems. Meanwhile, "Doe and Jones (2018)" highlight the importance of public perception and sense of security in shaping individuals' decision to utilize public transportation, thereby emphasizing the significance of transit police in fostering a safe and welcoming environment for commuters.
However, as we venture deeper into this curious inquiry, we are compelled to acknowledge the less conventional avenues of investigation that have captured our attention. While the correlation between transit police numbers and crime rates is a well-trodden path in empirical research, our exploration extends into a realm where skepticism may lurk – the enchanting world of magic.
Turning the pages of "The Secret History of Magic" by Peter Lamont and Jim Steinmeyer, we are reminded of the timeless appeal of illusion and the enduring fascination with the mystical arts. In a less conventional light, "The Prestige" by Christopher Priest introduces us to the dramatic intertwining of rivalry and magic, underscoring the captivating allure that magic holds over the human imagination.
Moreover, our investigations have led us down cinematic avenues, where we have found ourselves captivated by the spirited performances in "Now You See Me" and its sequel "Now You See Me 2". While these films may appear merely as entertainment, they offer glimpses of the spellbinding world of magic and illusion, igniting our curiosity as we endeavor to connect these fantastical narratives to the statistical underpinnings of transit police numbers and Google searches for 'how to do magic'.
In "Whimsical Wonders: A Statistical Analysis of Magic and Metropolis" (2020), the authors delved into the nuanced patterns of Google searches related to magic tricks and performances in urban settings, laying the groundwork for our current exploration into the enigmatic synchronization between public transit security and the allure of magic. While the intersection of statistics and sorcery may raise eyebrows, our findings endeavor to dispel doubts and illuminate the unexpected interplay between seemingly disparate elements.
As we progress through this whimsical journey of data discovery, we are reminded that while statistical significance may cloak our findings in a veneer of rigor, there is always a touch of magic hidden within every correlation coefficient. So, with a wave of our statistical wands, we embark on this mystical quest, determined to unravel the secrets that lie at the crossroads of transit policing and the captivating allure of magic.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic' revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation. For the time period spanning from 2004 to 2021, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with an r-squared value of 0.6999469, indicating that approximately 70% of the variability in magic-related search queries can be explained by the number of transit police in Texas. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this correlation, warranting further examination of this intriguing alliance.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicting the relationship between transit police numbers and Google searches for 'how to do magic' showcases a striking upward trend, affirming the enchanting connection between these seemingly disparate variables. The data points coalesce to form a captivating pattern, likened to the unfolding of a mesmerizing illusion, drawing attention to the compelling association between public transit security and the quest for magical knowledge.
The unprecedented strength of this correlation not only underscores the statistical significance but also prompts contemplation on the underlying mechanisms at play. While causation cannot be inferred from correlation alone, the magnitude of this association warrants further exploration to unveil the mystical forces intertwining transit policing and the allure of magic.
Our findings not only contribute to the discourse on public transit security but also offer an intriguing perspective on the transcendent appeal of magic in contemporary society. As we peel back the layers of this mesmerizing correlation, it becomes evident that the enchantment of the mystical arts may extend beyond the realm of entertainment, transcending into the intricacies of everyday life – or perhaps into the alluring realm of public transit security.
In conclusion, our study illuminates a captivating nexus between the number of transit police in Texas and the public's fascination with magic, unveiling an enchanting correlation that invites further exploration. Our findings not only showcase the allure of empirical research but also lend an unexpected touch of magic to the often-serious sphere of statistical analysis. Thus, as we continue to unravel the enigma of this correlation, we remain spellbound by the mystical interplay between transit policing and the captivating world of magic.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The enthralling intertwining of public transit security and the mystique of magic has unveiled a correlation of unprecedented magnitude in our investigation. Our results echo the findings of previous studies, as we are emboldened by the empirical evidence that supports the connection between the number of transit police in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. The positive correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, echoing the enchanting allure of magic, and its statistical significance at p < 0.01, offer compelling evidence of the mesmerizing nexus between transit policing and the quest for magical knowledge.

Building upon the previous research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), which emphasized the role of transit police in shaping the sense of security and public perception, our findings extend into the enchanting realm of magic. Subtly harkening back to the whimsical nuances of "The Prestige" and the spellbinding performances in "Now You See Me" and its sequel, our results reveal that the mystique of magic transcends the confines of entertainment, bordering on the entrancing interplay of public transit security.

The scatterplot depicting the relationship between transit police numbers and Google searches for 'how to do magic' evokes the allure of a well-performed illusion, drawing parallels to the captivating narratives of magical performances. Such captivating patterns, reminiscent of the dramatic unfolding of an enchanting spectacle, underscore the compelling association between public transit security and the pursuit of magical knowledge, deepening our understanding of these seemingly disparate phenomena.

Our findings not only contribute to the discourse on public transit security but also shed light on the transcendent appeal of magic in contemporary society, infusing a touch of wonder and enchantment into the statistical underpinnings of public transit data analysis. As we continue to navigate the enigmatic correlation between transit policing and the captivating world of magic, we are reminded that statistical rigor coexists harmoniously with the unexpected allure of mystical forces – perhaps hinting at the presence of a statistical sleight of hand, or a statistical rabbit pulled from an empirical hat.

Thus, as we traverse the remarkable alliance between public transit security and the whimsical world of magic, we remain captivated by the enduring enchantment that infuses the fabric of statistical analysis, adding an unexpected touch of magic to the often-serious sphere of empirical research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between the number of transit police in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Utilizing Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data from 2004 to 2021, our research team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with statistical significance at p < 0.01. As we embark on this mystical journey of data exploration, we unravel the enigmatic intertwining of public transit security and the allure of magic. Our findings not only shed light on the uncharted territories of transit policing but also offer a captivating glimpse into the whimsical world of wonder and illusion. So, join us as we unravel this spellbinding correlation and demonstrate that when it comes to public transit and magic, the results are nothing short of spellbinding.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
For decades, researchers have sought to uncover the intricate web of interconnections within various societal phenomena, oftentimes stumbling upon unexpected and whimsical relationships. One such seemingly improbable association that piqued our interest is the juxtaposition of transit police numbers in Texas and the trending curiosity for sorcery and sleight of hand, as evidenced by Google searches for 'how to do magic'.
While transit police traditionally focus on maintaining security and order within public transit systems, the notion of their influence extending to the mystical realm of prestidigitation might initially appear as an illusory endeavor. However, as we delved into this enigmatic correlation, it became increasingly apparent that there might be more than meets the eye – or wand, in this case.
The objective of this study is to rigorously examine the statistical relationship between the number of transit police in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic', with the aim of elucidating potential underlying factors that may contribute to this enthralling synergy. Through the meticulous analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data on transit police employment and Google Trends data reflecting public interest in magic-related tutorials over the period from 2004 to 2021, we endeavor to unravel the spellbinding bond between public transit security and the allure of magic.
As we embark on this captivating expedition, we anticipate that our findings will not only introduce a new dimension to the discourse on transit policing but also add a touch of enchantment to the realm of empirical research. Our inquiry seeks to assert that, while the practice of magic may thrive on secrecy and misdirection, its correlation with transit policing is an open and intriguing puzzle that begs to be solved. So, grab your wands – or data visualization tools – and join us on this curious exploration as we attempt to make sense of this unexpected yet undeniably bewitching connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic' revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation. For the time period spanning from 2004 to 2021, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with an r-squared value of 0.6999469, indicating that approximately 70% of the variability in magic-related search queries can be explained by the number of transit police in Texas. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this correlation, warranting further examination of this intriguing alliance.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicting the relationship between transit police numbers and Google searches for 'how to do magic' showcases a striking upward trend, affirming the enchanting connection between these seemingly disparate variables. The data points coalesce to form a captivating pattern, likened to the unfolding of a mesmerizing illusion, drawing attention to the compelling association between public transit security and the quest for magical knowledge.
The unprecedented strength of this correlation not only underscores the statistical significance but also prompts contemplation on the underlying mechanisms at play. While causation cannot be inferred from correlation alone, the magnitude of this association warrants further exploration to unveil the mystical forces intertwining transit policing and the allure of magic.
Our findings not only contribute to the discourse on public transit security but also offer an intriguing perspective on the transcendent appeal of magic in contemporary society. As we peel back the layers of this mesmerizing correlation, it becomes evident that the enchantment of the mystical arts may extend beyond the realm of entertainment, transcending into the intricacies of everyday life – or perhaps into the alluring realm of public transit security.
In conclusion, our study illuminates a captivating nexus between the number of transit police in Texas and the public's fascination with magic, unveiling an enchanting correlation that invites further exploration. Our findings not only showcase the allure of empirical research but also lend an unexpected touch of magic to the often-serious sphere of statistical analysis. Thus, as we continue to unravel the enigma of this correlation, we remain spellbound by the mystical interplay between transit policing and the captivating world of magic.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation of the correlation between the number of transit police in Texas and Google searches for 'how to do magic' has shed light on a remarkably enchanting relationship. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, steeped in statistical significance, unveils a captivating bond that seems to transcend the mundane boundaries of public transit security and the ethereal appeal of magic. While we cannot, in good conscience, assert causation based on correlation alone, the allure of this association is nothing short of mesmerizing. The bewitching nature of this correlation beckons further exploration, inviting researchers to embark on a whimsical journey into the uncharted territories of the mystical and the mundane, where the wand of statistical analysis wields its own brand of enchantment.
As we reflect on the implications of our findings, we are reminded of the age-old adage that "not all that glitters is gold" – indeed, sometimes it's a shimmering trail of statistical data that leads to a spellbinding discovery. This unexpected realm of inquiry not only adds a touch of whimsy to the field of empirical research but also underscores the sheer magic that can be found in the unlikeliest of places. Our research serves as a testament to the duality of the empirical world, where the rigors of statistical analysis dance harmoniously with the enchantment of unexpected correlations.
In light of the captivating findings presented in this study, we assert that the connection between transit police numbers in Texas and the allure of magic is a captivating enigma that warrants no further investigation. As we draw the curtain on this spellbinding inquiry, we leave it to future scholars to marvel at the unexpected convergence of statistical significance and sheer magic – a testament to the enduring enchantment that pervades the realm of empirical research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Transportation and Enchantment Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Urban Enchantment and Public Transit Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Magic of Public Transit: Conjuring the Connection Between Transit Police Numbers in Texas and Google Searches for 'how to do magic' with an abstract of This paper delves into the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between the number of transit police in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to do magic'. Utilizing Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends data from 2004 to 2021, our research team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8366283, with statistical significance at p < 0.01. As we embark on this mystical journey of data exploration, we unravel the enigmatic intertwining of public transit security and the allure of magic. Our findings not only shed light on the uncharted territories of transit policing but also offer a captivating glimpse into the whimsical world of wonder and illusion. So, join us as we unravel this spellbinding correlation and demonstrate that when it comes to public transit and magic, the results are nothing short of spellbinding.

ChatGPT:

transit police, Texas, public transit security, Google searches, 'how to do magic', correlation coefficient, statistical significance, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, public transit, magic, wonder, illusion, data exploration

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of transit police in Texas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of transit and railroad police in Texas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of transit police in Texas

Google searches for 'how to do magic'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to do magic' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to do magic'

Correlation r = 0.8366283 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6999469 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to do magic') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of transit police in Texas) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.51E-5. 0.0000150766502681343110000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.00151% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 66,328 random variables You don't actually need 66 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of transit police in Texas (Laborers)490800640710490700660590590630610630620590340100350270
Google searches for 'how to do magic' (Rel. search volume)58.416762.66677072.166763.333369.2567.166766.666761.333364.166767.166764.166752.166746.833340.833337.416742.166737.3333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([490,800,640,710,490,700,660,590,590,630,610,630,620,590,340,100,350,270,])
array_2 = np.array([58.4167,62.6667,70,72.1667,63.3333,69.25,67.1667,66.6667,61.3333,64.1667,67.1667,64.1667,52.1667,46.8333,40.8333,37.4167,42.1667,37.3333,])
array_1_name = "The number of transit police in Texas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to do magic'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 2285 · Black Variable ID: 14803 · Red Variable ID: 1523
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0