Download png, svg
AI explanation
As corn in Nebraska became less genetically modified, it started to develop a strong preference for handwritten letters over electronic communication. This increased the workload for the postal service, and unfortunately, the machine operators couldn't keep up with the sudden surge in demand for hand-canceling and sorting letters.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a high-tech scene where a lone farmer strolls through an expansive cornfield in Nebraska. The farmer should be surrounded by towering genetically modified corn, which reflects the innovative and futuristic aspect of agriculture. In the distance, depict a small post office operated by advanced postal service machines, with minimal human interaction. The overall imagery should capture the contrast between traditional farming and the high-tech postal service in a visually striking manner. The sky should have a serene, yet slightly surreal quality, hinting at the merging of nature and technology in this setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus A Discovery magazine cover image High-tech Woodblock painting Surrealism
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield in Nebraska, a farmer walks through rows of genetically modified corn. In the distance, a small post office is run by just a few postal service machine operators, handling the mail for the community.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield in Nebraska, a farmer walks through rows of genetically modified corn. In the distance, a small post office is run by just a few postal service machine operators, handling the mail for the community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a high-tech scene where a lone farmer strolls through an expansive cornfield in Nebraska. The farmer should be surrounded by towering genetically modified corn, which reflects the innovative and futuristic aspect of agriculture. In the distance, depict a small post office operated by advanced postal service machines, with minimal human interaction. The overall imagery should capture the contrast between traditional farming and the high-tech postal service in a visually striking manner. The sky should have a serene, yet slightly surreal quality, hinting at the merging of nature and technology in this setting.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska caused The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes and Absurdities Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators in the same state. The study utilizes data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a rigorous analysis of the period spanning from 2003 to 2022. Through sophisticated statistical techniques, we unveil a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, shedding light on this perplexing connection. Our findings highlight the need for further scrutiny into the complex interplay between agricultural practices and regional labor dynamics, offering insights that are as intriguing as an unexpected corn kernel in a postal package.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators in the same state. The study utilizes data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a rigorous analysis of the period spanning from 2003 to 2022. Through sophisticated statistical techniques, we unveil a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, shedding light on this perplexing connection. Our findings highlight the need for further scrutiny into the complex interplay between agricultural practices and regional labor dynamics, offering insights that are as intriguing as an unexpected corn kernel in a postal package.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between agriculture and labor dynamics has long been a topic of interest, with researchers often looking for kernels of truth amidst the vast fields of data. In this study, we delve into the rather unexpected connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and the employment of postal service machine operators in the state of Nebraska. While the link may seem as elusive as a worm in a cob, the potential implications of such a relationship are as intriguing as a corn maze on a cloudy day.
The utilization of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a subject of both fervent debate and technological advancement in recent years. Meanwhile, the employment of postal service machine operators represents a critical aspect of the labor force in Nebraska, playing a pivotal role in ensuring efficient mail processing – a task as delicate as, well, shucking corn. Despite these seemingly disparate domains, our analysis aims to uncover whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between them, and if so, what implications this A-maize-ing connection may hold.
To explore this enigmatic relationship, we have pored over extensive data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sifting through the numerical husks to reveal any hidden kernels of insight. Our analysis spans a period from 2003 to 2022, encompassing a range of environmental and economic changes that may have impacted both the cultivation of GMO corn and the employment trends in the postal service sector.
Through the use of sophisticated statistical techniques, we have endeavored to not only explore the existence of a correlation but also quantify its strength and significance. The results we present herein promise to unveil the hidden harmony between these seemingly unrelated variables, offering an empirical perspective that is as unexpected as finding a grain of corn in a haystack. As we proceed, we invite the reader to join us on this A-maize-ing journey through the intricacies of agricultural technology, labor dynamics, and statistical exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators in the same state. The study utilizes data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a rigorous analysis of the period spanning from 2003 to 2022. Through sophisticated statistical techniques, we unveil a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, shedding light on this perplexing connection. Our findings highlight the need for further scrutiny into the complex interplay between agricultural practices and regional labor dynamics, offering insights that are as intriguing as an unexpected corn kernel in a postal package.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between agriculture and labor dynamics has long been a topic of interest, with researchers often looking for kernels of truth amidst the vast fields of data. In this study, we delve into the rather unexpected connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and the employment of postal service machine operators in the state of Nebraska. While the link may seem as elusive as a worm in a cob, the potential implications of such a relationship are as intriguing as a corn maze on a cloudy day.
The utilization of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a subject of both fervent debate and technological advancement in recent years. Meanwhile, the employment of postal service machine operators represents a critical aspect of the labor force in Nebraska, playing a pivotal role in ensuring efficient mail processing – a task as delicate as, well, shucking corn. Despite these seemingly disparate domains, our analysis aims to uncover whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between them, and if so, what implications this A-maize-ing connection may hold.
To explore this enigmatic relationship, we have pored over extensive data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sifting through the numerical husks to reveal any hidden kernels of insight. Our analysis spans a period from 2003 to 2022, encompassing a range of environmental and economic changes that may have impacted both the cultivation of GMO corn and the employment trends in the postal service sector.
Through the use of sophisticated statistical techniques, we have endeavored to not only explore the existence of a correlation but also quantify its strength and significance. The results we present herein promise to unveil the hidden harmony between these seemingly unrelated variables, offering an empirical perspective that is as unexpected as finding a grain of corn in a haystack. As we proceed, we invite the reader to join us on this A-maize-ing journey through the intricacies of agricultural technology, labor dynamics, and statistical exploration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation has become increasingly prevalent in the agricultural landscape of Nebraska, reflecting a trend observed across many regions in the United States. Meanwhile, "Doe and Brown" investigate the labor market in Nebraska and remark upon the stability of employment in the postal service sector, a profession long associated with the reliable delivery of letters, packages, and the occasional suspiciously heavy envelope that might secretly contain a corn cob.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens" by Belinda Martineau offer insightful perspectives on the complexities of GMO usage in contemporary agriculture, providing a nuanced backdrop against which to contextualize our analysis. On a more whimsical note, works of fiction such as "Corn Kings and Postal Queens" and "The Corn Identity" add a touch of literary flair to our understanding of the subject matter, although they may not offer much in terms of scholarly empirical evidence.
Furthermore, it is crucial to consider the impact of popular culture and internet phenomena on our investigation. Memes such as "Corn on the Job" and "Mail Fail: When Corn Meets USPS" have garnered attention on social media platforms, providing a humorous, albeit tangential, reflection of the intersection between GMO corn and postal service operations. While these references are more lighthearted in nature, they do underscore the unexpected connections that can emerge in the most unlikely of places – much like finding a stray kernel of corn amidst a pile of mail.
As we embark on this A-maize-ing journey through the literature, it becomes apparent that the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and postal service employment in Nebraska is a topic ripe for exploration, with potential implications as diverse as the colorful array of corn kernels in a harvest. While the initial studies may lay the groundwork for our investigation, it is through our own rigorous analysis that we aim to shed light on this intriguing phenomenon, offering a blend of scholarly rigor and unexpected amusement that is as delightful as stumbling upon a mailbox with a corn cob for a flag.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators in the same state. The study utilizes data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a rigorous analysis of the period spanning from 2003 to 2022. Through sophisticated statistical techniques, we unveil a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, shedding light on this perplexing connection. Our findings highlight the need for further scrutiny into the complex interplay between agricultural practices and regional labor dynamics, offering insights that are as intriguing as an unexpected corn kernel in a postal package.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between agriculture and labor dynamics has long been a topic of interest, with researchers often looking for kernels of truth amidst the vast fields of data. In this study, we delve into the rather unexpected connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and the employment of postal service machine operators in the state of Nebraska. While the link may seem as elusive as a worm in a cob, the potential implications of such a relationship are as intriguing as a corn maze on a cloudy day.
The utilization of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a subject of both fervent debate and technological advancement in recent years. Meanwhile, the employment of postal service machine operators represents a critical aspect of the labor force in Nebraska, playing a pivotal role in ensuring efficient mail processing – a task as delicate as, well, shucking corn. Despite these seemingly disparate domains, our analysis aims to uncover whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between them, and if so, what implications this A-maize-ing connection may hold.
To explore this enigmatic relationship, we have pored over extensive data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sifting through the numerical husks to reveal any hidden kernels of insight. Our analysis spans a period from 2003 to 2022, encompassing a range of environmental and economic changes that may have impacted both the cultivation of GMO corn and the employment trends in the postal service sector.
Through the use of sophisticated statistical techniques, we have endeavored to not only explore the existence of a correlation but also quantify its strength and significance. The results we present herein promise to unveil the hidden harmony between these seemingly unrelated variables, offering an empirical perspective that is as unexpected as finding a grain of corn in a haystack. As we proceed, we invite the reader to join us on this A-maize-ing journey through the intricacies of agricultural technology, labor dynamics, and statistical exploration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To untangle the web of mystery surrounding the potential relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators, our research team implemented a multifaceted methodology replete with twists and turns. We initially scoured the vast expanse of the internet, akin to prospectors sifting through digital fields, to gather data from reputable sources such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Our data collection process involved extracting information spanning from 2003 to 2022, effectively encompassing a significant portion of the technological and economic evolution in both agricultural practices and labor dynamics. Picture this process as akin to traversing a corn maze, meticulously collecting kernels of information that may ultimately reveal the underlying structure of the enigmatic GMO corn-postal service correlation.
Once our data harvesting was complete, we employed a suite of statistical methods that could rival the complexity of genetic algorithms. These techniques included, but were not limited to, linear regression analysis, time series modeling, and structural equation modeling. This comprehensive approach allowed us to not only gauge the direction and strength of the relationship between our variables but also dissect the intricate mechanisms at play.
Furthermore, we applied rigorous validation procedures akin to separating the genetically modified from the conventional (non-GMO) strains of corn. Our validation process included cross-validation and sensitivity analysis to ensure the robustness of our findings and guard against the lurking specter of pseudo-correlation – much like safeguarding against false positives in a maize of statistical tests.
Lastly, we utilized sophisticated software such as R and Python to wrangle, massage, and coax our data into revealing the subtle nuances and insights that lay beneath the surface. This process involved the deft manipulation of algorithms and statistical packages, akin to mastering the art of shucking an ear of corn with precision and finesse.
Through this eclectic yet methodical approach, we were able to unravel the captivating correlation between GMO corn cultivation and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska, offering insights as surprising and unique as discovering an ear of rainbow-colored corn amidst a sea of standard yellow varieties.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9758936, r-squared of 0.9523683, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators in the same state. The study utilizes data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a rigorous analysis of the period spanning from 2003 to 2022. Through sophisticated statistical techniques, we unveil a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, shedding light on this perplexing connection. Our findings highlight the need for further scrutiny into the complex interplay between agricultural practices and regional labor dynamics, offering insights that are as intriguing as an unexpected corn kernel in a postal package.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between agriculture and labor dynamics has long been a topic of interest, with researchers often looking for kernels of truth amidst the vast fields of data. In this study, we delve into the rather unexpected connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and the employment of postal service machine operators in the state of Nebraska. While the link may seem as elusive as a worm in a cob, the potential implications of such a relationship are as intriguing as a corn maze on a cloudy day.
The utilization of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a subject of both fervent debate and technological advancement in recent years. Meanwhile, the employment of postal service machine operators represents a critical aspect of the labor force in Nebraska, playing a pivotal role in ensuring efficient mail processing – a task as delicate as, well, shucking corn. Despite these seemingly disparate domains, our analysis aims to uncover whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between them, and if so, what implications this A-maize-ing connection may hold.
To explore this enigmatic relationship, we have pored over extensive data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sifting through the numerical husks to reveal any hidden kernels of insight. Our analysis spans a period from 2003 to 2022, encompassing a range of environmental and economic changes that may have impacted both the cultivation of GMO corn and the employment trends in the postal service sector.
Through the use of sophisticated statistical techniques, we have endeavored to not only explore the existence of a correlation but also quantify its strength and significance. The results we present herein promise to unveil the hidden harmony between these seemingly unrelated variables, offering an empirical perspective that is as unexpected as finding a grain of corn in a haystack. As we proceed, we invite the reader to join us on this A-maize-ing journey through the intricacies of agricultural technology, labor dynamics, and statistical exploration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the link between GMO corn cultivation and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska are as intriguing as a cornhusk full of surprises. Our analysis uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected variables. This correlation value is higher than a cornstalk on a sunny day and suggests a tight bond between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the number of postal service machine operators in the state.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9523683 provides additional evidence of the robustness of this relationship, indicating that approximately 95.24% of the variability in the employment of postal service machine operators can be attributed to the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. This finding is as striking as a yellow kernel in a sea of white and reaffirms the significance of this A-maize-ing connection.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further strengthens the validity of our results, demonstrating that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This p-value is lower than the chances of finding an ear of corn in a popcorn bag, reinforcing the notion that the relationship between GMO corn use and the employment of postal service machine operators is not merely a kernel of truth but a statistically substantial finding.
For a visual representation of the relationship between these variables, please refer to Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation we have uncovered. This figure is as illuminating as a cob in a cornfield and provides a clear depiction of the association between GMO corn use and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska.
In conclusion, our analysis unravels a compelling connection between the cultivation of GMOs in corn and the employment of postal service machine operators, shedding light on an A-maize-ing relationship that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and labor studies. As we ponder the implications of this association, we are reminded of the unexpected and delightful surprises that await us in the vast fields of statistical exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators in the same state. The study utilizes data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a rigorous analysis of the period spanning from 2003 to 2022. Through sophisticated statistical techniques, we unveil a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, shedding light on this perplexing connection. Our findings highlight the need for further scrutiny into the complex interplay between agricultural practices and regional labor dynamics, offering insights that are as intriguing as an unexpected corn kernel in a postal package.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation has become increasingly prevalent in the agricultural landscape of Nebraska, reflecting a trend observed across many regions in the United States. Meanwhile, "Doe and Brown" investigate the labor market in Nebraska and remark upon the stability of employment in the postal service sector, a profession long associated with the reliable delivery of letters, packages, and the occasional suspiciously heavy envelope that might secretly contain a corn cob.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens" by Belinda Martineau offer insightful perspectives on the complexities of GMO usage in contemporary agriculture, providing a nuanced backdrop against which to contextualize our analysis. On a more whimsical note, works of fiction such as "Corn Kings and Postal Queens" and "The Corn Identity" add a touch of literary flair to our understanding of the subject matter, although they may not offer much in terms of scholarly empirical evidence.
Furthermore, it is crucial to consider the impact of popular culture and internet phenomena on our investigation. Memes such as "Corn on the Job" and "Mail Fail: When Corn Meets USPS" have garnered attention on social media platforms, providing a humorous, albeit tangential, reflection of the intersection between GMO corn and postal service operations. While these references are more lighthearted in nature, they do underscore the unexpected connections that can emerge in the most unlikely of places – much like finding a stray kernel of corn amidst a pile of mail.
As we embark on this A-maize-ing journey through the literature, it becomes apparent that the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and postal service employment in Nebraska is a topic ripe for exploration, with potential implications as diverse as the colorful array of corn kernels in a harvest. While the initial studies may lay the groundwork for our investigation, it is through our own rigorous analysis that we aim to shed light on this intriguing phenomenon, offering a blend of scholarly rigor and unexpected amusement that is as delightful as stumbling upon a mailbox with a corn cob for a flag.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the link between GMO corn cultivation and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska are as intriguing as a cornhusk full of surprises. Our analysis uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected variables. This correlation value is higher than a cornstalk on a sunny day and suggests a tight bond between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the number of postal service machine operators in the state.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9523683 provides additional evidence of the robustness of this relationship, indicating that approximately 95.24% of the variability in the employment of postal service machine operators can be attributed to the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. This finding is as striking as a yellow kernel in a sea of white and reaffirms the significance of this A-maize-ing connection.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further strengthens the validity of our results, demonstrating that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This p-value is lower than the chances of finding an ear of corn in a popcorn bag, reinforcing the notion that the relationship between GMO corn use and the employment of postal service machine operators is not merely a kernel of truth but a statistically substantial finding.
For a visual representation of the relationship between these variables, please refer to Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation we have uncovered. This figure is as illuminating as a cob in a cornfield and provides a clear depiction of the association between GMO corn use and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska.
In conclusion, our analysis unravels a compelling connection between the cultivation of GMOs in corn and the employment of postal service machine operators, shedding light on an A-maize-ing relationship that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and labor studies. As we ponder the implications of this association, we are reminded of the unexpected and delightful surprises that await us in the vast fields of statistical exploration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
These results present an a-maize-ing revelation, unveiling a notable association between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Our findings align remarkably well with prior research, affirming the work of Smith et al. and Doe and Brown, who, much like diligent farmers tending to their fields, meticulously sowed the seeds of curiosity regarding this peculiar relationship.
The strong correlation coefficient uncovered in this study, reminiscent of a hearty ear of corn in a bountiful harvest, echoes the sentiments expressed by Smith et al., who implied the widespread proliferation of GMOs in corn cultivation. This connection speaks volumes about the subtle yet impactful influence of genetically modified organisms, much like the nuanced flavor of a perfectly grilled corn cob at a summer barbecue.
Moreover, our results reinforce the stability observed in postal service employment noted by Doe and Brown, resonating with the reliability of corn as a staple in the agricultural industry. This synchronicity between our findings and previous literature is as harmonious as a well-tuned combine harvester navigating a golden field of maize, underscoring the interconnectedness of apparently disparate domains.
The robustness of the relationship, as evidenced by the high r-squared value, mirrors the resilience of a healthy corn stalk standing tall against the elements, providing further credence to the influence of GMO corn cultivation on the employment landscape. This finding underscores the significance of our study, akin to recognizing the value of a prized corncob in a bushel of ordinary ears.
The observed statistical significance of the correlation, symbolized by the p-value lower than the odds of discovering a kernel of corn in a haystack, underpins the substantial nature of this association. This statistical gravitas serves as a testament to the significance of genetically modified organisms in shaping not only agricultural practices but also the labor market, much like a kernel of corn nestled in an unexpected location.
In conclusion, our research contributes a kernel of insight to the burgeoning field of agricultural and labor economics, cultivating a deeper understanding of the intricate web of relationships that underpin societal dynamics. As we bask in the a-maize-ing discoveries unveiled by this study, we are reminded of the enduring potential for unexpected connections to thrive in the vast expanse of empirical inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators in the same state. The study utilizes data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a rigorous analysis of the period spanning from 2003 to 2022. Through sophisticated statistical techniques, we unveil a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, shedding light on this perplexing connection. Our findings highlight the need for further scrutiny into the complex interplay between agricultural practices and regional labor dynamics, offering insights that are as intriguing as an unexpected corn kernel in a postal package.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between agriculture and labor dynamics has long been a topic of interest, with researchers often looking for kernels of truth amidst the vast fields of data. In this study, we delve into the rather unexpected connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and the employment of postal service machine operators in the state of Nebraska. While the link may seem as elusive as a worm in a cob, the potential implications of such a relationship are as intriguing as a corn maze on a cloudy day.
The utilization of GMOs in corn cultivation has been a subject of both fervent debate and technological advancement in recent years. Meanwhile, the employment of postal service machine operators represents a critical aspect of the labor force in Nebraska, playing a pivotal role in ensuring efficient mail processing – a task as delicate as, well, shucking corn. Despite these seemingly disparate domains, our analysis aims to uncover whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between them, and if so, what implications this A-maize-ing connection may hold.
To explore this enigmatic relationship, we have pored over extensive data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sifting through the numerical husks to reveal any hidden kernels of insight. Our analysis spans a period from 2003 to 2022, encompassing a range of environmental and economic changes that may have impacted both the cultivation of GMO corn and the employment trends in the postal service sector.
Through the use of sophisticated statistical techniques, we have endeavored to not only explore the existence of a correlation but also quantify its strength and significance. The results we present herein promise to unveil the hidden harmony between these seemingly unrelated variables, offering an empirical perspective that is as unexpected as finding a grain of corn in a haystack. As we proceed, we invite the reader to join us on this A-maize-ing journey through the intricacies of agricultural technology, labor dynamics, and statistical exploration.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the link between GMO corn cultivation and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska are as intriguing as a cornhusk full of surprises. Our analysis uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unconnected variables. This correlation value is higher than a cornstalk on a sunny day and suggests a tight bond between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the number of postal service machine operators in the state.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9523683 provides additional evidence of the robustness of this relationship, indicating that approximately 95.24% of the variability in the employment of postal service machine operators can be attributed to the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. This finding is as striking as a yellow kernel in a sea of white and reaffirms the significance of this A-maize-ing connection.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further strengthens the validity of our results, demonstrating that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This p-value is lower than the chances of finding an ear of corn in a popcorn bag, reinforcing the notion that the relationship between GMO corn use and the employment of postal service machine operators is not merely a kernel of truth but a statistically substantial finding.
For a visual representation of the relationship between these variables, please refer to Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation we have uncovered. This figure is as illuminating as a cob in a cornfield and provides a clear depiction of the association between GMO corn use and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska.
In conclusion, our analysis unravels a compelling connection between the cultivation of GMOs in corn and the employment of postal service machine operators, shedding light on an A-maize-ing relationship that transcends the boundaries of traditional agricultural and labor studies. As we ponder the implications of this association, we are reminded of the unexpected and delightful surprises that await us in the vast fields of statistical exploration.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In closing, our study has peeled away the outer layers of obscurity to reveal a kernel of truth: there exists a remarkably strong correlation between the utilization of GMOs in corn cultivation and the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. The A-maize-ing correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 highlights the striking bond between these seemingly unconnected variables, akin to the unexpected delight of finding an extra cob in a six-pack.
The r-squared value of 0.9523683 underscores the robustness of this relationship, demonstrating that the variability in the employment of postal service machine operators is as tightly intertwined with GMO corn use as a corn kernel with its cob. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 definitively attests to the statistical significance of our findings, making this connection as solid as a cob of corn in a genetically sturdy crop.
With these compelling results, we believe that our analysis has shucked away any doubt surrounding the potential influence of GMO corn cultivation on the employment of postal service machine operators in Nebraska. As we bring this A-maize-ing journey to a close, we sow the seeds of knowledge and humor, affirming that no further research is needed in this a-maize-ing field.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes and Absurdities
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Workplace Health
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska with an abstract of This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the employment of postal service machine operators in the same state. The study utilizes data sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a rigorous analysis of the period spanning from 2003 to 2022. Through sophisticated statistical techniques, we unveil a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9758936 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, shedding light on this perplexing connection. Our findings highlight the need for further scrutiny into the complex interplay between agricultural practices and regional labor dynamics, offering insights that are as intriguing as an unexpected corn kernel in a postal package.
ChatGPT:
GMO corn, postal service machine operators, Nebraska, genetically modified organisms, corn cultivation, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, agricultural practices, labor dynamics
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GMO use in corn grown in NebraskaDetailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Nebraska that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska
The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of postal service mail sorters, processors, and processing machine operators in Nebraska
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9523683 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-13. 0.0000000000002392516232690712
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 2.4E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,179,699,959,132 random variables You don't actually need 4 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.94, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska (GMO corn %) | 36 | 41 | 39 | 37 | 31 | 27 | 26 | 22 | 15 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska (Laborers) | 1590 | 1560 | 1500 | 1450 | 1470 | 1380 | 1220 | 1130 | 1080 | 1070 | 960 | 960 | 820 | 830 | 810 | 730 | 720 | 730 | 730 | 750 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([36,41,39,37,31,27,26,22,15,16,6,4,4,3,3,3,3,3,2,3,])
array_2 = np.array([1590,1560,1500,1450,1470,1380,1220,1130,1080,1070,960,960,820,830,810,730,720,730,730,750,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska"
array_2_name = "The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska
- Line chart for only The number of postal service machine operators in Nebraska
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: A-Maize-ing Connections: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Corn and Postal Service Machine Operators in Nebraska
Your rating skills are top-notch!
Correlation ID: 2250 · Black Variable ID: 717 · Red Variable ID: 11006