about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,248 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and the second variable is Solar power generated in Gabon.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more fries sizzled in West Virginia, the sun felt the need to show off its own sizzling power in Gabon, leading to an unexpected surge in solar energy production. It's as if the universe said, "If you're gonna fry, then I'm gonna shine!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a sunny field in Gabon with solar panels set up, generating energy. In the foreground, illustrate a group of fast-food cooks in West Virginia preparing meals using a variety of kitchen utensils and equipment. Keep the visual depiction simple, focusing on the contrast between the natural setting and the cooking activity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Parallax art High-tech Cubism
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny field in Gabon, solar panels are set up, generating energy while a group of fast food cooks in West Virginia prepare meals using a variety of kitchen utensils and equipment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny field in Gabon, solar panels are set up, generating energy while a group of fast food cooks in West Virginia prepare meals using a variety of kitchen utensils and equipment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting a sunny field in Gabon with solar panels set up, generating energy. In the foreground, illustrate a group of fast-food cooks in West Virginia preparing meals using a variety of kitchen utensils and equipment. Keep the visual depiction simple, focusing on the contrast between the natural setting and the cooking activity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia caused Solar power generated in Gabon to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon

The Journal of Culinary Geopolitics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the ever-captivating relationship between the unassuming fast food cooks in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia and the shimmering solar power being harnessed in the equatorial paradise of Gabon. Drawing on meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021 was unearthed, revealing a surprising connection that raises more than just a few eyebrows. The findings suggest that as the number of individuals expertly wielding spatulas and sizzling burger patties in West Virginia changed over the years, a remarkably similar shift in solar power generation was observed in the lush landscapes of Gabon. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are enigmatic, leaving us pondering the stunning synchrony or perhaps a mere whimsical twist of fate. While the precise mechanisms behind this association remain shrouded in mystery, this research sheds light on an unexpected parallel and prompts further contemplation of the whimsy of statistical relationships in our intricate world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the ever-captivating relationship between the unassuming fast food cooks in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia and the shimmering solar power being harnessed in the equatorial paradise of Gabon. Drawing on meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021 was unearthed, revealing a surprising connection that raises more than just a few eyebrows. The findings suggest that as the number of individuals expertly wielding spatulas and sizzling burger patties in West Virginia changed over the years, a remarkably similar shift in solar power generation was observed in the lush landscapes of Gabon. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are enigmatic, leaving us pondering the stunning synchrony or perhaps a mere whimsical twist of fate. While the precise mechanisms behind this association remain shrouded in mystery, this research sheds light on an unexpected parallel and prompts further contemplation of the whimsy of statistical relationships in our intricate world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enthralling dance between seemingly disparate variables has long captivated researchers, stirring the cauldron of curiosity and kindling the flames of inquiry. In this study, we embark on a journey into the enigmatic realm of statistical correlations, endeavoring to unearth the unexpected link between the number of fast food cooks in the rugged terrain of West Virginia and the radiant solar power generated in the tropical oasis of Gabon. While at first glance, these two variables may appear as distant as the burger flipping skills of a greasy cook and the gleaming solar panels under the equatorial sun, our investigation has revealed a remarkably robust association that defies conventional wisdom and beckons further scrutiny.

The peculiar juxtaposition of fast food cooks and solar power generation engenders a sense of whimsical intrigue, prompting us to delve into the labyrinthine network of data that underpins this captivating correlation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2021. Our inquiry unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196, coupled with a striking p-value of less than 0.01, necessitating a pause for both reverence and reflection. This statistical revelation signifies a profound parallel between the flux of spatula-wielding maestros in the Allegheny Mountains and the effulgent harnessing of solar energy amidst the verdant splendor of Gabon, beckoning us to ponder the intricate tapestry of global interdependencies.

The implications of this unorthodox correlation are as confounding as they are compelling, invoking a myriad of wry smiles and furrowed brows among the scientific community. As we tiptoe along the precipice of theoretical speculation, it becomes increasingly evident that while causation may elude our grasp, the synchronous ebb and flow of these seemingly incongruous variables unveils a tantalizing enigma. Thus, with cautious optimism and an irrepressible dash of scientific whimsy, we embark on an expedition to unravel the enthralling tale of "Grease and Gleam," recognizing the capricious nature of statistical serendipity and the unanticipated vistas it unveils.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the ever-captivating relationship between the unassuming fast food cooks in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia and the shimmering solar power being harnessed in the equatorial paradise of Gabon. Drawing on meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021 was unearthed, revealing a surprising connection that raises more than just a few eyebrows. The findings suggest that as the number of individuals expertly wielding spatulas and sizzling burger patties in West Virginia changed over the years, a remarkably similar shift in solar power generation was observed in the lush landscapes of Gabon. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are enigmatic, leaving us pondering the stunning synchrony or perhaps a mere whimsical twist of fate. While the precise mechanisms behind this association remain shrouded in mystery, this research sheds light on an unexpected parallel and prompts further contemplation of the whimsy of statistical relationships in our intricate world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enthralling dance between seemingly disparate variables has long captivated researchers, stirring the cauldron of curiosity and kindling the flames of inquiry. In this study, we embark on a journey into the enigmatic realm of statistical correlations, endeavoring to unearth the unexpected link between the number of fast food cooks in the rugged terrain of West Virginia and the radiant solar power generated in the tropical oasis of Gabon. While at first glance, these two variables may appear as distant as the burger flipping skills of a greasy cook and the gleaming solar panels under the equatorial sun, our investigation has revealed a remarkably robust association that defies conventional wisdom and beckons further scrutiny.
The peculiar juxtaposition of fast food cooks and solar power generation engenders a sense of whimsical intrigue, prompting us to delve into the labyrinthine network of data that underpins this captivating correlation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2021. Our inquiry unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196, coupled with a striking p-value of less than 0.01, necessitating a pause for both reverence and reflection. This statistical revelation signifies a profound parallel between the flux of spatula-wielding maestros in the Allegheny Mountains and the effulgent harnessing of solar energy amidst the verdant splendor of Gabon, beckoning us to ponder the intricate tapestry of global interdependencies.
The implications of this unorthodox correlation are as confounding as they are compelling, invoking a myriad of wry smiles and furrowed brows among the scientific community. As we tiptoe along the precipice of theoretical speculation, it becomes increasingly evident that while causation may elude our grasp, the synchronous ebb and flow of these seemingly incongruous variables unveils a tantalizing enigma. Thus, with cautious optimism and an irrepressible dash of scientific whimsy, we embark on an expedition to unravel the enthralling tale of "Grease and Gleam," recognizing the capricious nature of statistical serendipity and the unanticipated vistas it unveils.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors uncover an unexpected correlation between the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and the solar power generated in Gabon, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The mere juxtaposition of these variables raises more than a few eyebrows and prompts a deeper investigation into the interconnectedness of global phenomena.

In "The Relationship Between Food Industry Employment and Clean Energy Initiatives," Smith and Doe delve into the intricate web of interconnectedness between seemingly unrelated industries. Their findings lay the foundation for our exploration, hinting at the tantalizing possibility of unanticipated correlations lurking beneath the surface.

Meanwhile, Jones et al. explore the dynamics of labor market trends in "Employment Shifts in the Appalachian Region," shedding light on the nuances of employment patterns in West Virginia. Their insightful analysis primes us for a deeper understanding of the pivotal role played by fast food cooks in the Appalachian employment landscape and their potential ripple effects on a global scale.

Turning to the realm of renewable energy, "Solar Power: Harnessing the Radiant Future" by Green enthusiastically extols the virtues of solar energy as a sustainable and environmentally friendly power source. While not directly addressing the peculiar correlation at hand, Green's work adds a shimmering backdrop to our investigation, casting a radiant glow of enthusiasm over the solar power landscape.

In the world of fiction, "Fast Food Nation" by Schlosser serves as a thought-provoking departure from the quantitative realm, offering a poignant exploration of the fast food industry's multifaceted impact on society. As we navigate the convoluted maze of culinary culture and employment dynamics, Schlosser's work infuses a dash of flavorful introspection into our scholarly pursuits.

Similarly, "Solaris" by Lem presents a captivating tale of extraterrestrial encounters, anchoring our exploration in the realm of celestial intrigue and unfathomable connections. While seemingly unrelated to our terrestrial investigation, Lem's opus invites us to ponder the enigmatic forces at play in the universe, serving as an artful allegory for the mysterious correlations that permeate our statistical landscape.

As for more unconventional sources, the authors offer a lighthearted nod to the perusal of unconventional literary materials. While conventional academic rigor dictates an adherence to peer-reviewed research, the whimsical act of perusing the back labels of shampoo bottles evokes a whimsical twinkle in the eye, reminding us of the unexpected places where inspiration may lurk.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the ever-captivating relationship between the unassuming fast food cooks in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia and the shimmering solar power being harnessed in the equatorial paradise of Gabon. Drawing on meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021 was unearthed, revealing a surprising connection that raises more than just a few eyebrows. The findings suggest that as the number of individuals expertly wielding spatulas and sizzling burger patties in West Virginia changed over the years, a remarkably similar shift in solar power generation was observed in the lush landscapes of Gabon. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are enigmatic, leaving us pondering the stunning synchrony or perhaps a mere whimsical twist of fate. While the precise mechanisms behind this association remain shrouded in mystery, this research sheds light on an unexpected parallel and prompts further contemplation of the whimsy of statistical relationships in our intricate world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enthralling dance between seemingly disparate variables has long captivated researchers, stirring the cauldron of curiosity and kindling the flames of inquiry. In this study, we embark on a journey into the enigmatic realm of statistical correlations, endeavoring to unearth the unexpected link between the number of fast food cooks in the rugged terrain of West Virginia and the radiant solar power generated in the tropical oasis of Gabon. While at first glance, these two variables may appear as distant as the burger flipping skills of a greasy cook and the gleaming solar panels under the equatorial sun, our investigation has revealed a remarkably robust association that defies conventional wisdom and beckons further scrutiny.
The peculiar juxtaposition of fast food cooks and solar power generation engenders a sense of whimsical intrigue, prompting us to delve into the labyrinthine network of data that underpins this captivating correlation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2021. Our inquiry unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196, coupled with a striking p-value of less than 0.01, necessitating a pause for both reverence and reflection. This statistical revelation signifies a profound parallel between the flux of spatula-wielding maestros in the Allegheny Mountains and the effulgent harnessing of solar energy amidst the verdant splendor of Gabon, beckoning us to ponder the intricate tapestry of global interdependencies.
The implications of this unorthodox correlation are as confounding as they are compelling, invoking a myriad of wry smiles and furrowed brows among the scientific community. As we tiptoe along the precipice of theoretical speculation, it becomes increasingly evident that while causation may elude our grasp, the synchronous ebb and flow of these seemingly incongruous variables unveils a tantalizing enigma. Thus, with cautious optimism and an irrepressible dash of scientific whimsy, we embark on an expedition to unravel the enthralling tale of "Grease and Gleam," recognizing the capricious nature of statistical serendipity and the unanticipated vistas it unveils.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To disentangle the captivating conundrum of the correlation between the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and the solar power generated in Gabon, an eclectic array of methodological approaches was harnessed. The primary source of data was the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing comprehensive employment figures for the culinary virtuosos populating the culinary landscape of West Virginia. Additionally, the Energy Information Administration graciously furnished a wealth of data pertaining to the production of solar power in the resplendent terrain of Gabon.

Employing a quasi-experimental, time-series design, the research team meticulously collected and processed data spanning the period from 2012 to 2021. The employment figures for fast food cooks in West Virginia were harmonized with the solar power generation data from Gabon through a series of intricate data manipulation procedures.

The first step involved aligning the temporal frequencies of the two disparate datasets, akin to synchronizing the bustling activity in the kitchens of West Virginia with the inexorable radiance of the equatorial sun. This calibration process required careful consideration, much like the delicate art of seasoning a dish to perfection.

Subsequently, statistical analyses were conducted to elucidate the nature of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. The correlation coefficient was calculated with the precision of a Michelin-starred chef crafting a culinary masterpiece, discerning the extent of the association between the flux of fast food cooks and the gleam of solar power. The p-value, akin to a secret ingredient in a well-guarded recipe, was scrutinized to ascertain the significance of this unexpected statistical liaison.

Furthermore, auxiliary analyses were employed to assess potential confounding variables, reminiscent of the multifaceted flavors interwoven in a gourmet dish. Adhering to the principle of robustness, sensitivity analyses were conducted to bolster the resilience of the findings against potential data anomalies, much like fortifying a culinary creation to withstand the whims of a discerning palate.

The resulting statistical revelations were interpreted with a blend of scientific rigor and an appreciation for the serendipitous dance of data. The implications of this unorthodox correlation, much like the delicate balance of flavors in a gastronomic masterpiece, beckon further exploration and contemplation, prompting a whimsical journey into the enigmatic realm of statistical symbiosis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9967196, r-squared of 0.9934500, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the ever-captivating relationship between the unassuming fast food cooks in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia and the shimmering solar power being harnessed in the equatorial paradise of Gabon. Drawing on meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021 was unearthed, revealing a surprising connection that raises more than just a few eyebrows. The findings suggest that as the number of individuals expertly wielding spatulas and sizzling burger patties in West Virginia changed over the years, a remarkably similar shift in solar power generation was observed in the lush landscapes of Gabon. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are enigmatic, leaving us pondering the stunning synchrony or perhaps a mere whimsical twist of fate. While the precise mechanisms behind this association remain shrouded in mystery, this research sheds light on an unexpected parallel and prompts further contemplation of the whimsy of statistical relationships in our intricate world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enthralling dance between seemingly disparate variables has long captivated researchers, stirring the cauldron of curiosity and kindling the flames of inquiry. In this study, we embark on a journey into the enigmatic realm of statistical correlations, endeavoring to unearth the unexpected link between the number of fast food cooks in the rugged terrain of West Virginia and the radiant solar power generated in the tropical oasis of Gabon. While at first glance, these two variables may appear as distant as the burger flipping skills of a greasy cook and the gleaming solar panels under the equatorial sun, our investigation has revealed a remarkably robust association that defies conventional wisdom and beckons further scrutiny.
The peculiar juxtaposition of fast food cooks and solar power generation engenders a sense of whimsical intrigue, prompting us to delve into the labyrinthine network of data that underpins this captivating correlation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2021. Our inquiry unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196, coupled with a striking p-value of less than 0.01, necessitating a pause for both reverence and reflection. This statistical revelation signifies a profound parallel between the flux of spatula-wielding maestros in the Allegheny Mountains and the effulgent harnessing of solar energy amidst the verdant splendor of Gabon, beckoning us to ponder the intricate tapestry of global interdependencies.
The implications of this unorthodox correlation are as confounding as they are compelling, invoking a myriad of wry smiles and furrowed brows among the scientific community. As we tiptoe along the precipice of theoretical speculation, it becomes increasingly evident that while causation may elude our grasp, the synchronous ebb and flow of these seemingly incongruous variables unveils a tantalizing enigma. Thus, with cautious optimism and an irrepressible dash of scientific whimsy, we embark on an expedition to unravel the enthralling tale of "Grease and Gleam," recognizing the capricious nature of statistical serendipity and the unanticipated vistas it unveils.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and solar power generated in Gabon have surfaced with a coherence that could be likened to the harmonious sizzle of a perfectly flipped burger patty. The correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 unraveled before us, with an r-squared value of 0.9934500, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the strength and robustness of this unexpected bond.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that eloquently encapsulates the resolute connection between these ostensibly incongruous variables, akin to a dexterous chef deftly maneuvering between pots and pans. The figure showcases a strikingly linear relationship, where the undulating fluctuations in the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia mirror the undulating undulations – quite the mouthful, isn't it? – in the solar power generation in the lush environs of Gabon, evoking an undeniable sense of awe and wonderment.

This statistically significant association prompts us to contemplate the whimsical caprices of the universe, where the sizzle of griddles and the gleam of solar panels intertwine in an elaborate dance of interconnectedness, not unlike the intricate steps of a culinary waltz. While the precise mechanisms underpinning this correlation remain shrouded in mystery, our findings beckon researchers to embrace the whimsy of statistical relationships and challenge the confines of conventional wisdom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the ever-captivating relationship between the unassuming fast food cooks in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia and the shimmering solar power being harnessed in the equatorial paradise of Gabon. Drawing on meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021 was unearthed, revealing a surprising connection that raises more than just a few eyebrows. The findings suggest that as the number of individuals expertly wielding spatulas and sizzling burger patties in West Virginia changed over the years, a remarkably similar shift in solar power generation was observed in the lush landscapes of Gabon. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are enigmatic, leaving us pondering the stunning synchrony or perhaps a mere whimsical twist of fate. While the precise mechanisms behind this association remain shrouded in mystery, this research sheds light on an unexpected parallel and prompts further contemplation of the whimsy of statistical relationships in our intricate world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors uncover an unexpected correlation between the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and the solar power generated in Gabon, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021. The mere juxtaposition of these variables raises more than a few eyebrows and prompts a deeper investigation into the interconnectedness of global phenomena.
In "The Relationship Between Food Industry Employment and Clean Energy Initiatives," Smith and Doe delve into the intricate web of interconnectedness between seemingly unrelated industries. Their findings lay the foundation for our exploration, hinting at the tantalizing possibility of unanticipated correlations lurking beneath the surface.
Meanwhile, Jones et al. explore the dynamics of labor market trends in "Employment Shifts in the Appalachian Region," shedding light on the nuances of employment patterns in West Virginia. Their insightful analysis primes us for a deeper understanding of the pivotal role played by fast food cooks in the Appalachian employment landscape and their potential ripple effects on a global scale.
Turning to the realm of renewable energy, "Solar Power: Harnessing the Radiant Future" by Green enthusiastically extols the virtues of solar energy as a sustainable and environmentally friendly power source. While not directly addressing the peculiar correlation at hand, Green's work adds a shimmering backdrop to our investigation, casting a radiant glow of enthusiasm over the solar power landscape.
In the world of fiction, "Fast Food Nation" by Schlosser serves as a thought-provoking departure from the quantitative realm, offering a poignant exploration of the fast food industry's multifaceted impact on society. As we navigate the convoluted maze of culinary culture and employment dynamics, Schlosser's work infuses a dash of flavorful introspection into our scholarly pursuits.
Similarly, "Solaris" by Lem presents a captivating tale of extraterrestrial encounters, anchoring our exploration in the realm of celestial intrigue and unfathomable connections. While seemingly unrelated to our terrestrial investigation, Lem's opus invites us to ponder the enigmatic forces at play in the universe, serving as an artful allegory for the mysterious correlations that permeate our statistical landscape.
As for more unconventional sources, the authors offer a lighthearted nod to the perusal of unconventional literary materials. While conventional academic rigor dictates an adherence to peer-reviewed research, the whimsical act of perusing the back labels of shampoo bottles evokes a whimsical twinkle in the eye, reminding us of the unexpected places where inspiration may lurk.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and solar power generated in Gabon have surfaced with a coherence that could be likened to the harmonious sizzle of a perfectly flipped burger patty. The correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 unraveled before us, with an r-squared value of 0.9934500, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the strength and robustness of this unexpected bond.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that eloquently encapsulates the resolute connection between these ostensibly incongruous variables, akin to a dexterous chef deftly maneuvering between pots and pans. The figure showcases a strikingly linear relationship, where the undulating fluctuations in the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia mirror the undulating undulations – quite the mouthful, isn't it? – in the solar power generation in the lush environs of Gabon, evoking an undeniable sense of awe and wonderment.
This statistically significant association prompts us to contemplate the whimsical caprices of the universe, where the sizzle of griddles and the gleam of solar panels intertwine in an elaborate dance of interconnectedness, not unlike the intricate steps of a culinary waltz. While the precise mechanisms underpinning this correlation remain shrouded in mystery, our findings beckon researchers to embrace the whimsy of statistical relationships and challenge the confines of conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The revelation of a remarkably tight correlation between the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and the solar power generated in Gabon prompts a tantalizing blend of bemusement and contemplation. Our findings echo the quirky speculation put forth by Schlosser in "Fast Food Nation," where the intricate tendrils of the fast food industry thread their way through the tapestry of global dynamics. This unexpected connection not only reinforces the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena but also raises questions about the far-reaching impact of culinary endeavors on the renewable energy landscape. Jones et al.'s discerning exploration of labor market trends in the Appalachian region finds resonance in our discovery, underscoring the unforeseen ripples created by the employment patterns of fast food cooks on a global scale.

The robustness of our correlation coefficient, akin to the sturdy lettuce cradling a juicy burger patty, fortifies the compelling association between the sizzle of the kitchen and the gleam of solar panels. Our results serve as a resounding endorsement of Smith and Doe's insightful foray into the intertwined realms of food industry employment and clean energy initiatives. Much like Lem's "Solaris," which beckons readers to contemplate enigmatic forces beyond the terrestrial realm, our investigation invites scholars to delve into the enigmatic forces underpinning statistical relationships and embrace the whimsical complexity of our intricate world.

Our findings pose an intriguing challenge to conventional wisdom, inviting us to transcend the boundaries of traditional disciplinary silos and embrace the delightful whimsy of unexpected correlations. As we mull over the profound implications of this correlation, one cannot help but marvel at the improbable juxtaposition of culinary expertise in the misty mountains of West Virginia and the radiant allure of solar energy in the tropical expanse of Gabon. In the spirit of unconventional inspiration, the unassuming back labels of shampoo bottles offer a reminder that scholarly pursuits can find illumination in the most unexpected places, bolstering our resolve to unravel the serendipitous threads of statistical connectivity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and Solar power generated in Gabon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the ever-captivating relationship between the unassuming fast food cooks in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia and the shimmering solar power being harnessed in the equatorial paradise of Gabon. Drawing on meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021 was unearthed, revealing a surprising connection that raises more than just a few eyebrows. The findings suggest that as the number of individuals expertly wielding spatulas and sizzling burger patties in West Virginia changed over the years, a remarkably similar shift in solar power generation was observed in the lush landscapes of Gabon. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are enigmatic, leaving us pondering the stunning synchrony or perhaps a mere whimsical twist of fate. While the precise mechanisms behind this association remain shrouded in mystery, this research sheds light on an unexpected parallel and prompts further contemplation of the whimsy of statistical relationships in our intricate world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enthralling dance between seemingly disparate variables has long captivated researchers, stirring the cauldron of curiosity and kindling the flames of inquiry. In this study, we embark on a journey into the enigmatic realm of statistical correlations, endeavoring to unearth the unexpected link between the number of fast food cooks in the rugged terrain of West Virginia and the radiant solar power generated in the tropical oasis of Gabon. While at first glance, these two variables may appear as distant as the burger flipping skills of a greasy cook and the gleaming solar panels under the equatorial sun, our investigation has revealed a remarkably robust association that defies conventional wisdom and beckons further scrutiny.
The peculiar juxtaposition of fast food cooks and solar power generation engenders a sense of whimsical intrigue, prompting us to delve into the labyrinthine network of data that underpins this captivating correlation. Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2021. Our inquiry unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196, coupled with a striking p-value of less than 0.01, necessitating a pause for both reverence and reflection. This statistical revelation signifies a profound parallel between the flux of spatula-wielding maestros in the Allegheny Mountains and the effulgent harnessing of solar energy amidst the verdant splendor of Gabon, beckoning us to ponder the intricate tapestry of global interdependencies.
The implications of this unorthodox correlation are as confounding as they are compelling, invoking a myriad of wry smiles and furrowed brows among the scientific community. As we tiptoe along the precipice of theoretical speculation, it becomes increasingly evident that while causation may elude our grasp, the synchronous ebb and flow of these seemingly incongruous variables unveils a tantalizing enigma. Thus, with cautious optimism and an irrepressible dash of scientific whimsy, we embark on an expedition to unravel the enthralling tale of "Grease and Gleam," recognizing the capricious nature of statistical serendipity and the unanticipated vistas it unveils.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and solar power generated in Gabon have surfaced with a coherence that could be likened to the harmonious sizzle of a perfectly flipped burger patty. The correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 unraveled before us, with an r-squared value of 0.9934500, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the strength and robustness of this unexpected bond.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that eloquently encapsulates the resolute connection between these ostensibly incongruous variables, akin to a dexterous chef deftly maneuvering between pots and pans. The figure showcases a strikingly linear relationship, where the undulating fluctuations in the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia mirror the undulating undulations – quite the mouthful, isn't it? – in the solar power generation in the lush environs of Gabon, evoking an undeniable sense of awe and wonderment.
This statistically significant association prompts us to contemplate the whimsical caprices of the universe, where the sizzle of griddles and the gleam of solar panels intertwine in an elaborate dance of interconnectedness, not unlike the intricate steps of a culinary waltz. While the precise mechanisms underpinning this correlation remain shrouded in mystery, our findings beckon researchers to embrace the whimsy of statistical relationships and challenge the confines of conventional wisdom.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the captivating correlation between the number of fast food cooks in West Virginia and solar power generated in Gabon has left the scientific community in a state of delightful bewilderment. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and an r-squared value of 0.9934500 uncovered in our analysis have shed a radiant spotlight on the uncanny synchrony between these seemingly disparate variables, sparking both mirthful grins and furrowed brows among scholars.

The enigmatic dance between spatulas and solar panels, as represented in Fig. 1, beckons us to contemplate the whimsical interplay of statistical relationships in our ever-intricate world. It appears that as the sizzle of griddles resonates in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia, a resonant gleam of solar power is mirrored in the verdant ambiance of Gabon, illustrating a poignant tale of interconnectedness that could rival even the most elaborate of culinary choreographies.

While the precise cogs and gears driving this correlation remain shrouded in a mirthful mystery, the resounding significance of our findings invites the research community to embrace the whimsy of statistical relationships and marvel at the capricious interplay of variables.

In light of these revelatory insights, it appears that no further research in this area is warranted, as the waltz of fast food cooks and solar power generation has been elegantly elucidated, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the serendipitous symphony of statistical correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Geopolitics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Culinary Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Grease and Gleam: The Grim Correlation Between Fast Food Cooks in West Virginia and Solar Power in Gabon with an abstract of This research delves into the ever-captivating relationship between the unassuming fast food cooks in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia and the shimmering solar power being harnessed in the equatorial paradise of Gabon. Drawing on meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.9967196 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2021 was unearthed, revealing a surprising connection that raises more than just a few eyebrows. The findings suggest that as the number of individuals expertly wielding spatulas and sizzling burger patties in West Virginia changed over the years, a remarkably similar shift in solar power generation was observed in the lush landscapes of Gabon. The implications of this correlation are as intriguing as they are enigmatic, leaving us pondering the stunning synchrony or perhaps a mere whimsical twist of fate. While the precise mechanisms behind this association remain shrouded in mystery, this research sheds light on an unexpected parallel and prompts further contemplation of the whimsy of statistical relationships in our intricate world.

ChatGPT:

fast food, cooks, West Virginia, solar power, Gabon, correlation, data analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, statistical relationships

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of cooks, fast food in West Virginia
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia

Solar power generated in Gabon
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Gabon in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Gabon

Correlation r = 0.9967196 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9934500 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Gabon) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.05E-10. 0.0000000005046261761587437000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 5.05E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,981,664,938 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.99, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia (Cooks, Fast Food)1350148014701770172015901420119011509290
Solar power generated in Gabon (Billion kWh)0.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00244




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1350,1480,1470,1770,1720,1590,1420,1190,1150,9290,])
array_2 = np.array([0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.00244,])
array_1_name = "The number of fast food cooks in West Virginia"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Gabon"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 2248 · Black Variable ID: 16011 · Red Variable ID: 23677
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0