Spurious correlation #2,214 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'download ringtones' and the second variable is The number of secretaries in Rhode Island. The chart goes from 2010 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'download ringtones' and the second variable is The number of secretaries in Rhode Island. The chart goes from 2010 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As the ringtone industry tone-deafened, it created a ripple effect in the job market. The lack of demand for catchy tunes meant fewer calls for secretaries in Rhode Island, leaving them with no time to "ring up" their old job responsibilities. It seems the writing was on the wall for these secretaries - or should I say, the lack of ringing was on the phone!

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a cybernetic art style visual featuring a cozy office setting in Providence, Rhode Island. Show a group of secretaries capturing the essence of inner-city office life, busily typing at their desks and managing schedules. Meanwhile, on their computer screens, they are all seen searching "download ringtones" on Google, expressing the modern trend of personalizing phones with new tunes. The setting is well-lit and filled with modern office equipment. The atmosphere exudes a sense of productivity and connectivity enhanced through digital technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'download ringtones' and The number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim Sci-fi fantacy Cybernetic art Cybernetic art Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'download ringtones' and The number of secretaries in Rhode Island together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy office in Providence, Rhode Island, a group of secretaries are busily typing away at their desks, answering phones and managing schedules. Meanwhile, on their computer screens, they are all searching "download ringtones" on Google, looking for the perfect new tunes to personalize their phones.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy office in Providence, Rhode Island, a group of secretaries are busily typing away at their desks, answering phones and managing schedules. Meanwhile, on their computer screens, they are all searching "download ringtones" on Google, looking for the perfect new tunes to personalize their phones. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a cybernetic art style visual featuring a cozy office setting in Providence, Rhode Island. Show a group of secretaries capturing the essence of inner-city office life, busily typing at their desks and managing schedules. Meanwhile, on their computer screens, they are all seen searching "download ringtones" on Google, expressing the modern trend of personalizing phones with new tunes. The setting is well-lit and filled with modern office equipment. The atmosphere exudes a sense of productivity and connectivity enhanced through digital technology.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in download ringtones (Google searches for 'download ringtones') caused The number of secretaries in Rhode Island to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship

The Journal of Linguistic Lightheartedness

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'download ringtones' and The number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical exploration of the surprising connection between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in the small but mighty state of Rhode Island. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2022. The results of this study not only raise eyebrows but also prompt chuckles as we ponder the possibility of secretaries moonlighting as ringtone creators or perhaps Rhode Islanders' insatiable thirst for sonic personalization driving the state's demand for secretarial services. This research aims to entertain and inspire further investigations into unusual connections in the world of labor economics and digital behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of labor economics and digital behavior, one does not typically expect to find a harmonious duet between the search term "download ringtones" and the occupation of secretarial work in the quaint state of Rhode Island. However, as we dive into the whimsical world of correlation coefficients and peculiar patterns, we uncover a surprising relationship that could rival the most captivating of rhymes.
This paper delves into the uncharted territory where the whimsical world of digital trends serendipitously meets the practical realm of workforce composition. The quest to uncover the connection between the ringing tones of mobile phones and the typing clacks of office keyboards arises not only as an intellectual pursuit but also as a source of amusement for the inquisitive mind. After all, who would have imagined that the seemingly disparate domains of musical snippets and administrative support could be entwined in a melody of statistical significance?
As we ambled through the labyrinth of Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics reports, our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient that glared back at us like an unexpected punchline in a serious conversation. With a coefficient of 0.9574274 and a p-value that made statisticians raise an eyebrow, we found ourselves on the brink of an intriguing revelation. Could it be that the quest for the perfect ringtone melody and the need for efficient secretarial services in Rhode Island are not merely happenstance, but rather, a rhythmical pattern waiting to be discovered?
In this paper, we seek not only to unveil this peculiar correlation but also to imbue a sense of levity into the typically austere expanse of academic research. While we harness the power of data analysis and statistical inference to unravel the mysteries of the labor market and digital behavior, we do so with a twinkle in our eye and a metaphorical drumroll in the background. In doing so, we hope to not only pique the curiosity of fellow researchers but also spark a symphony of laughter and lightheartedness amidst the gravitas of scholarly inquiry.
So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey to uncover the rhyme-ationship between ringtone searches and secretarial positions in the charming state of Rhode Island. Prepare for unexpected twists and turns, and perhaps a pun or two, as we navigate through the empirical realm with a grin and a flourish.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The unexpected concatenation of "download ringtones" and the occupation of secretarial work in Rhode Island might lead one to believe they have stumbled upon a whimsical parody of academic research. However, the pursuit of understanding this curious correlation requires a thorough review of existing literature.

In "Economic Affair," Smith et al. explore the relationship between digital trends and labor market dynamics, anchoring their analysis in the evocative power of technological phenomena on occupational patterns. Although their work does not explicitly mention ringtones or secretarial positions, it sets the stage for contemplating the interplay of digital behaviors and employment scenarios.

Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Labor Lullabies: Navigating the Melodic Maze of Occupational Trends," illuminate the nuanced ways in which seemingly discordant elements in the digital realm can harmonize with labor market phenomena. While their focus is primarily on broader trends, their insights into the serendipitous intertwining of disparate elements serve as fertile ground for our investigation into the ringtone-secretary confluence.

Turning to non-fiction publications, "Digital Ditties: A Socioeconomic Analysis" by Economist Extraordinaire delves into the digital music landscape and its potential impact on consumer behavior. Although the authors do not specifically delve into ringtone downloads, their discussion of music consumption habits lays a theoretical foundation for entertaining the idea of an unconventional nexus between digital audio preferences and occupational demands.

In the annals of fiction, the works of authors such as Charles Dickens, with "Great Expectations," and Helen Fielding, with "Bridget Jones's Diary," tantalize the reader with vivid depictions of office life and the daily experiences of secretaries. While these literary masterpieces are not geared towards empirical analysis, their portrayal of the administrative world adds a touch of whimsy to our exploration of secretarial positions.

Further expanding our horizons, social media platforms prove to be unexpected sources of insight. A tweet by @DataDivaRhodeIsland humorously alludes to the idea of secretaries moonlighting as ringtone composers, igniting a spark of whimsy that resonates with our own musings. While not a formal academic source, the levity and creativity of public discourse offer an unconventional lens through which to view the interplay of digital trends and occupational roles.

With this diverse array of literature as our backdrop, we embark on our own investigative journey, armed with statistical tools and a hearty dose of humor, to unravel the melodic mystery intertwining ringtone searches and secretarial positions in the delightful state of Rhode Island.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'download ringtones' and The number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2010 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical exploration of the surprising connection between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in the small but mighty state of Rhode Island. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2022. The results of this study not only raise eyebrows but also prompt chuckles as we ponder the possibility of secretaries moonlighting as ringtone creators or perhaps Rhode Islanders' insatiable thirst for sonic personalization driving the state's demand for secretarial services. This research aims to entertain and inspire further investigations into unusual connections in the world of labor economics and digital behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of labor economics and digital behavior, one does not typically expect to find a harmonious duet between the search term "download ringtones" and the occupation of secretarial work in the quaint state of Rhode Island. However, as we dive into the whimsical world of correlation coefficients and peculiar patterns, we uncover a surprising relationship that could rival the most captivating of rhymes.
This paper delves into the uncharted territory where the whimsical world of digital trends serendipitously meets the practical realm of workforce composition. The quest to uncover the connection between the ringing tones of mobile phones and the typing clacks of office keyboards arises not only as an intellectual pursuit but also as a source of amusement for the inquisitive mind. After all, who would have imagined that the seemingly disparate domains of musical snippets and administrative support could be entwined in a melody of statistical significance?
As we ambled through the labyrinth of Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics reports, our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient that glared back at us like an unexpected punchline in a serious conversation. With a coefficient of 0.9574274 and a p-value that made statisticians raise an eyebrow, we found ourselves on the brink of an intriguing revelation. Could it be that the quest for the perfect ringtone melody and the need for efficient secretarial services in Rhode Island are not merely happenstance, but rather, a rhythmical pattern waiting to be discovered?
In this paper, we seek not only to unveil this peculiar correlation but also to imbue a sense of levity into the typically austere expanse of academic research. While we harness the power of data analysis and statistical inference to unravel the mysteries of the labor market and digital behavior, we do so with a twinkle in our eye and a metaphorical drumroll in the background. In doing so, we hope to not only pique the curiosity of fellow researchers but also spark a symphony of laughter and lightheartedness amidst the gravitas of scholarly inquiry.
So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey to uncover the rhyme-ationship between ringtone searches and secretarial positions in the charming state of Rhode Island. Prepare for unexpected twists and turns, and perhaps a pun or two, as we navigate through the empirical realm with a grin and a flourish.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study traverses the borderlands of digital analytics and labor market investigation, employing a blend of rigorous statistical techniques and a healthy dose of whimsy. Our data collection and analysis were akin to conducting a symphony, with each instrument playing its unique part in composing the melody of insights.

Data Sources:
We embarked on our odyssey by delving into the vast seas of Google Trends, sifting through the digital waves to capture the rhythmic patterns of "download ringtones" searches from 2010 to 2022. Additionally, we docked at the Bureau of Labor Statistics to secure the number of secretarial positions in the charming state of Rhode Island for the same time period. The fusion of these disparate sources created a harmonious data ensemble, ready for the crescendo of correlation analysis.

Correlation Analysis:
Armed with the melody of data, we employed the majestic tool of correlation analysis to discern the lyrical dance between ringtone searches and secretarial positions. Using the magical incantations of statistical software, we conjured the Pearson correlation coefficient, which revealed a compelling value of 0.9574274. This fortuitous number seemed to wink at us, whispering its secrets and beckoning us further into the web of whimsy.

P-Value Extravaganza:
In tandem with the correlation coefficient, we summoned the p-value to join our statistical masquerade. To our delight, the p-value pirouetted gracefully beneath the threshold of 0.01, signaling a statistically significant relationship between our two seemingly disparate variables. The significance of this p-value was not lost on us; indeed, it raised the curtain on a potentially uproarious performance of unexpected connections.

Inferential Jig:
Equipped with the correlation coefficient, the p-value, and a sprinkle of statistical fairy dust, we pirouetted into the realm of inference. Our findings not only entertained the possibility of a non-spurious relationship but also ignited the spark of curiosity for further investigations into the whimsical duet of ringtone cravings and secretarial symphonies.

In essence, the methodology of this research sauntered through the garden of data collection, waltzed along the corridors of correlation analysis, and concluded with a grand performance of inference. This harmonic blend of scientific rigor and cheerful exploration paved the way for uncovering the melodic connection between "download ringtones" searches and the number of secretaries in the captivating state of Rhode Island.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'download ringtones' and The number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2010 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9574274, r-squared of 0.9166671, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical exploration of the surprising connection between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in the small but mighty state of Rhode Island. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2022. The results of this study not only raise eyebrows but also prompt chuckles as we ponder the possibility of secretaries moonlighting as ringtone creators or perhaps Rhode Islanders' insatiable thirst for sonic personalization driving the state's demand for secretarial services. This research aims to entertain and inspire further investigations into unusual connections in the world of labor economics and digital behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of labor economics and digital behavior, one does not typically expect to find a harmonious duet between the search term "download ringtones" and the occupation of secretarial work in the quaint state of Rhode Island. However, as we dive into the whimsical world of correlation coefficients and peculiar patterns, we uncover a surprising relationship that could rival the most captivating of rhymes.
This paper delves into the uncharted territory where the whimsical world of digital trends serendipitously meets the practical realm of workforce composition. The quest to uncover the connection between the ringing tones of mobile phones and the typing clacks of office keyboards arises not only as an intellectual pursuit but also as a source of amusement for the inquisitive mind. After all, who would have imagined that the seemingly disparate domains of musical snippets and administrative support could be entwined in a melody of statistical significance?
As we ambled through the labyrinth of Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics reports, our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient that glared back at us like an unexpected punchline in a serious conversation. With a coefficient of 0.9574274 and a p-value that made statisticians raise an eyebrow, we found ourselves on the brink of an intriguing revelation. Could it be that the quest for the perfect ringtone melody and the need for efficient secretarial services in Rhode Island are not merely happenstance, but rather, a rhythmical pattern waiting to be discovered?
In this paper, we seek not only to unveil this peculiar correlation but also to imbue a sense of levity into the typically austere expanse of academic research. While we harness the power of data analysis and statistical inference to unravel the mysteries of the labor market and digital behavior, we do so with a twinkle in our eye and a metaphorical drumroll in the background. In doing so, we hope to not only pique the curiosity of fellow researchers but also spark a symphony of laughter and lightheartedness amidst the gravitas of scholarly inquiry.
So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey to uncover the rhyme-ationship between ringtone searches and secretarial positions in the charming state of Rhode Island. Prepare for unexpected twists and turns, and perhaps a pun or two, as we navigate through the empirical realm with a grin and a flourish.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed a remarkably robust correlation between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Over the period from 2010 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9166671 further underscores the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 91.67% of the variability in secretarial positions can be explained by the variability in "download ringtones" searches. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of statistical significance to this whimsical discovery.

Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting this unexpected relationship, reminiscent of the unpredictable twists and turns in a whimsical children's story. It showcases the tight clustering of data points, almost as if the ringtone searches and the secretarial positions were performing a synchronized dance, or perhaps engaged in a high-spirited game of musical chairs.

These findings, though surprising, open a Pandora's box of delightful speculations. Could it be that the undeniably catchy tunes of ringtones have an inexplicable influence on the demand for secretarial services in the Ocean State? Or could it be that the industrious secretaries themselves are avid ringtone aficionados, surreptitiously indulging in the latest musical offerings between filing tasks?

In a scholarly context where meticulous analysis reigns supreme, this unexpected correlation stands out like a vibrant and unapologetically loud ringtone in a silent library. It not only challenges traditional notions of labor economics but also injects an element of the bizarrely charming into the often sober world of statistical inference.

The convergence of these frivolous and functional elements sparks a dialogue that transcends traditional academic discourse, inviting researchers and readers alike to ponder the playful and the profound, the hilarious and the hitherto unforeseen connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study will undoubtedly serve as a whimsical touchstone for further explorations into the inexplicable correlations that permeate the intricate tapestry of digital behavior and labor dynamics, weaving together a scholarly narrative that is both playful and profound.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'download ringtones' and The number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical exploration of the surprising connection between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in the small but mighty state of Rhode Island. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2022. The results of this study not only raise eyebrows but also prompt chuckles as we ponder the possibility of secretaries moonlighting as ringtone creators or perhaps Rhode Islanders' insatiable thirst for sonic personalization driving the state's demand for secretarial services. This research aims to entertain and inspire further investigations into unusual connections in the world of labor economics and digital behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The unexpected concatenation of "download ringtones" and the occupation of secretarial work in Rhode Island might lead one to believe they have stumbled upon a whimsical parody of academic research. However, the pursuit of understanding this curious correlation requires a thorough review of existing literature.
In "Economic Affair," Smith et al. explore the relationship between digital trends and labor market dynamics, anchoring their analysis in the evocative power of technological phenomena on occupational patterns. Although their work does not explicitly mention ringtones or secretarial positions, it sets the stage for contemplating the interplay of digital behaviors and employment scenarios.
Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Labor Lullabies: Navigating the Melodic Maze of Occupational Trends," illuminate the nuanced ways in which seemingly discordant elements in the digital realm can harmonize with labor market phenomena. While their focus is primarily on broader trends, their insights into the serendipitous intertwining of disparate elements serve as fertile ground for our investigation into the ringtone-secretary confluence.
Turning to non-fiction publications, "Digital Ditties: A Socioeconomic Analysis" by Economist Extraordinaire delves into the digital music landscape and its potential impact on consumer behavior. Although the authors do not specifically delve into ringtone downloads, their discussion of music consumption habits lays a theoretical foundation for entertaining the idea of an unconventional nexus between digital audio preferences and occupational demands.
In the annals of fiction, the works of authors such as Charles Dickens, with "Great Expectations," and Helen Fielding, with "Bridget Jones's Diary," tantalize the reader with vivid depictions of office life and the daily experiences of secretaries. While these literary masterpieces are not geared towards empirical analysis, their portrayal of the administrative world adds a touch of whimsy to our exploration of secretarial positions.
Further expanding our horizons, social media platforms prove to be unexpected sources of insight. A tweet by @DataDivaRhodeIsland humorously alludes to the idea of secretaries moonlighting as ringtone composers, igniting a spark of whimsy that resonates with our own musings. While not a formal academic source, the levity and creativity of public discourse offer an unconventional lens through which to view the interplay of digital trends and occupational roles.
With this diverse array of literature as our backdrop, we embark on our own investigative journey, armed with statistical tools and a hearty dose of humor, to unravel the melodic mystery intertwining ringtone searches and secretarial positions in the delightful state of Rhode Island.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed a remarkably robust correlation between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Over the period from 2010 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9166671 further underscores the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 91.67% of the variability in secretarial positions can be explained by the variability in "download ringtones" searches. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of statistical significance to this whimsical discovery.
Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting this unexpected relationship, reminiscent of the unpredictable twists and turns in a whimsical children's story. It showcases the tight clustering of data points, almost as if the ringtone searches and the secretarial positions were performing a synchronized dance, or perhaps engaged in a high-spirited game of musical chairs.
These findings, though surprising, open a Pandora's box of delightful speculations. Could it be that the undeniably catchy tunes of ringtones have an inexplicable influence on the demand for secretarial services in the Ocean State? Or could it be that the industrious secretaries themselves are avid ringtone aficionados, surreptitiously indulging in the latest musical offerings between filing tasks?
In a scholarly context where meticulous analysis reigns supreme, this unexpected correlation stands out like a vibrant and unapologetically loud ringtone in a silent library. It not only challenges traditional notions of labor economics but also injects an element of the bizarrely charming into the often sober world of statistical inference.
The convergence of these frivolous and functional elements sparks a dialogue that transcends traditional academic discourse, inviting researchers and readers alike to ponder the playful and the profound, the hilarious and the hitherto unforeseen connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study will undoubtedly serve as a whimsical touchstone for further explorations into the inexplicable correlations that permeate the intricate tapestry of digital behavior and labor dynamics, weaving together a scholarly narrative that is both playful and profound.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation uncovered in this study has left us with more questions than answers, akin to stumbling upon a stack of unexplained punchlines in a comedy club. Our findings resonate with the whimsical musings of Economist Extraordinaire and the levity of the tweet by @DataDivaRhodeIsland, both of which cheekily hinted at the improbable joining of ringtone searches and secretarial positions. Furthermore, Charles Dickens's vivid depiction of office life in "Great Expectations" appears to have presciently alluded to the harmonious coexistence of melodic ringtones and the staccato typing sounds of secretaries - a pairing that, until now, lay dormant in the realm of fanciful conjecture.

The statistical endeavor undertaken in this research not only reaffirms the unexpectedly strong correlation between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in Rhode Island but also garners a chuckle or two as we endeavor to unravel the comical conundrum. The scatterplot resembles a lighthearted game of musical chairs - a visual testament to the captivating and peculiarly tight intertwining of seemingly incongruous variables, evoking delightful imagery reminiscent of a jolly circus act.

Our findings offer a whimsical reprieve from the staid confines of traditional academic discourse, injecting an undeniable note of playful curiosity into the otherwise serious realm of labor economics. The intriguing confluence of ringtone searches and secretarial positions not only challenges conventional wisdom but also beckons us to ponder the marvelously absurd connections that underpin digital behavior and occupational demand. We invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling this melodic mystery, a delightful diversion from the usual serious symphonies of scholarly investigation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'download ringtones' and The number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical exploration of the surprising connection between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in the small but mighty state of Rhode Island. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2022. The results of this study not only raise eyebrows but also prompt chuckles as we ponder the possibility of secretaries moonlighting as ringtone creators or perhaps Rhode Islanders' insatiable thirst for sonic personalization driving the state's demand for secretarial services. This research aims to entertain and inspire further investigations into unusual connections in the world of labor economics and digital behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of labor economics and digital behavior, one does not typically expect to find a harmonious duet between the search term "download ringtones" and the occupation of secretarial work in the quaint state of Rhode Island. However, as we dive into the whimsical world of correlation coefficients and peculiar patterns, we uncover a surprising relationship that could rival the most captivating of rhymes.
This paper delves into the uncharted territory where the whimsical world of digital trends serendipitously meets the practical realm of workforce composition. The quest to uncover the connection between the ringing tones of mobile phones and the typing clacks of office keyboards arises not only as an intellectual pursuit but also as a source of amusement for the inquisitive mind. After all, who would have imagined that the seemingly disparate domains of musical snippets and administrative support could be entwined in a melody of statistical significance?
As we ambled through the labyrinth of Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics reports, our research team stumbled upon a correlation coefficient that glared back at us like an unexpected punchline in a serious conversation. With a coefficient of 0.9574274 and a p-value that made statisticians raise an eyebrow, we found ourselves on the brink of an intriguing revelation. Could it be that the quest for the perfect ringtone melody and the need for efficient secretarial services in Rhode Island are not merely happenstance, but rather, a rhythmical pattern waiting to be discovered?
In this paper, we seek not only to unveil this peculiar correlation but also to imbue a sense of levity into the typically austere expanse of academic research. While we harness the power of data analysis and statistical inference to unravel the mysteries of the labor market and digital behavior, we do so with a twinkle in our eye and a metaphorical drumroll in the background. In doing so, we hope to not only pique the curiosity of fellow researchers but also spark a symphony of laughter and lightheartedness amidst the gravitas of scholarly inquiry.
So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey to uncover the rhyme-ationship between ringtone searches and secretarial positions in the charming state of Rhode Island. Prepare for unexpected twists and turns, and perhaps a pun or two, as we navigate through the empirical realm with a grin and a flourish.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed a remarkably robust correlation between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in Rhode Island. Over the period from 2010 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9166671 further underscores the strength of this correlation, suggesting that approximately 91.67% of the variability in secretarial positions can be explained by the variability in "download ringtones" searches. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of statistical significance to this whimsical discovery.
Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot depicting this unexpected relationship, reminiscent of the unpredictable twists and turns in a whimsical children's story. It showcases the tight clustering of data points, almost as if the ringtone searches and the secretarial positions were performing a synchronized dance, or perhaps engaged in a high-spirited game of musical chairs.
These findings, though surprising, open a Pandora's box of delightful speculations. Could it be that the undeniably catchy tunes of ringtones have an inexplicable influence on the demand for secretarial services in the Ocean State? Or could it be that the industrious secretaries themselves are avid ringtone aficionados, surreptitiously indulging in the latest musical offerings between filing tasks?
In a scholarly context where meticulous analysis reigns supreme, this unexpected correlation stands out like a vibrant and unapologetically loud ringtone in a silent library. It not only challenges traditional notions of labor economics but also injects an element of the bizarrely charming into the often sober world of statistical inference.
The convergence of these frivolous and functional elements sparks a dialogue that transcends traditional academic discourse, inviting researchers and readers alike to ponder the playful and the profound, the hilarious and the hitherto unforeseen connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. This study will undoubtedly serve as a whimsical touchstone for further explorations into the inexplicable correlations that permeate the intricate tapestry of digital behavior and labor dynamics, weaving together a scholarly narrative that is both playful and profound.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up this zany expedition into the nexus of "download ringtones" searches and the employment of secretaries in Rhode Island, we are reminded of the sheer serendipity of statistical discoveries. The correlation coefficient of 0.9574274 and the r-squared value of 0.9166671 have left us in awe, much like stumbling upon a perfectly timed punchline. Our scatterplot, reminiscent of a whimsical children's book illustration, paints a captivating picture of the synchronicity between these seemingly disparate variables, almost like a coordinated dance between cellular melodies and administrative prowess.

These findings beckon us to consider the potential influences at play. Could it be that the irresistibly catchy tunes of ringtones ripple through the Rhode Island labor market, orchestrating a crescendo of secretarial demand? Or perhaps, there's a clandestine society of secretary enthusiasts, covertly harmonizing over the latest ringtone releases while sorting through paperwork.

In light of this revelatory discovery, it's evident that the world of labor economics harbors hidden harmonies and melodic mysteries, prompting us to appreciate the curious rhythms that underpin economic activity. While this lighthearted exploration may raise eyebrows, it also serves as a reminder of the unexpected charm that resides within the annals of academic inquiry.

In closing, it's clear that no further research is needed in this area, as this melodious revelation has struck a chord that resonates loudly and delightfully. Let us bid adieu to this delightful symphony of statistical whimsy and look forward to future endeavors that might, with luck, be just as melodiously merry.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Linguistic Lightheartedness

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Whimsical Linguistics and Onomatopoeia

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship with an abstract of This paper presents a whimsical exploration of the surprising connection between Google searches for "download ringtones" and the number of secretaries in the small but mighty state of Rhode Island. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9574274, with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2022. The results of this study not only raise eyebrows but also prompt chuckles as we ponder the possibility of secretaries moonlighting as ringtone creators or perhaps Rhode Islanders' insatiable thirst for sonic personalization driving the state's demand for secretarial services. This research aims to entertain and inspire further investigations into unusual connections in the world of labor economics and digital behavior.

ChatGPT:

ringtone downloads, Google searches, secretarial positions, Rhode Island labor statistics, correlation coefficient, Google Trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics, labor economics, digital behavior, Rhode Island workforce, unusual connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Google searches for 'download ringtones'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'download ringtones' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: ^{See full details} Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'download ringtones'

The number of secretaries in Rhode Island
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of secretaries and administrative assistants, except legal, medical, and executive in Rhode Island
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of secretaries in Rhode Island

Correlation r = 0.9574274 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.9166671 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of secretaries in Rhode Island) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'download ringtones') over the 13 years from 2010 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.8E-7.^Show 0.0000002829940072462954000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 2.8E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,533,644 random variables^Note You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022
Google searches for 'download ringtones' (Rel. search volume)	84.8333	84.1667	78.25	77.0833	78.25	80.6667	72.1667	74	85.3333	72.6667	53.6667	45.8333	47.5
The number of secretaries in Rhode Island (Laborers)	6920	7320	7250	7110	7040	6900	6610	6560	6790	6590	5470	4980	4920

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([84.8333,84.1667,78.25,77.0833,78.25,80.6667,72.1667,74,85.3333,72.6667,53.6667,45.8333,47.5,])
array_2 = np.array([6920,7320,7250,7110,7040,6900,6610,6560,6790,6590,5470,4980,4920,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'download ringtones'"
array_2_name = "The number of secretaries in Rhode Island"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Google searches for 'download ringtones'
Line chart for only The number of secretaries in Rhode Island
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Ringtone Searches and Secretarial Positions: A Rhyming Rhyme-ationship

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!

Correlation ID: 2214 · Black Variable ID: 1463 · Red Variable ID: 18577


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: