Spurious correlation #2,203 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Yogurt consumption and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'. The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Yogurt consumption and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'. The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

It's simple. As yogurt consumption rose, so did our tolerance for the sour and curdled aspects of life. It's as if the active cultures in the yogurt fermented a newfound ability to handle all the whey-ward frustrations. So next time you're feeling moosy, just grab a spoon and dairy yourself to a better mood. Remember, when life gives you lemons, make fro-yo!

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a whimsical scene featuring a character sitting at a table with a spoon in one hand, savoring a cup of yogurt. The character should be depicted using cute and cuddly cartoon graphics. In the scene, the character should also be shown using a phone to search "i cant even" on Google, with an expression of exasperation or disbelief. The overall image should be playful and engaging, evoking a sense of lightheartedness and humor. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Steampunk Cutsy graphics Realistic High-tech
ChatGPT: Cutsy graphics

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A person sitting at a table with a spoon in one hand, enjoying a cup of yogurt while using their phone to search "i cant even" on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy graphics ] and depicting this scene: A person sitting at a table with a spoon in one hand, enjoying a cup of yogurt while using their phone to search "i cant even" on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a whimsical scene featuring a character sitting at a table with a spoon in one hand, savoring a cup of yogurt. The character should be depicted using cute and cuddly cartoon graphics. In the scene, the character should also be shown using a phone to search "i cant even" on Google, with an expression of exasperation or disbelief. The overall image should be playful and engaging, evoking a sense of lightheartedness and humor.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Yogurt consumption caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation

The Journal of Quirky Microbiome Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of yogurt has long been associated with digestive health and overall well-being. However, the impact of yogurt intake on public sentiment and expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere has remained largely unexplored. This study delves into the intriguing relationship between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even', a popular expression denoting overwhelming frustration or incredulity.

Using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2021 to investigate the potential link between yogurt consumption and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. Our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 (p < 0.01), suggesting a robust association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

The results of this study offer compelling evidence that a spoonful of yogurt may indeed soothe not only the stomach but also the exasperated soul, as reflected in the digital realm's vernacular expressions. Our research opens the door to further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, paving the whey for future investigations at the intersection of dietary habits and internet culture.

If our findings curd your interest, it's time to spread the word about the potential power of probiotics in managing digital exasperation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The consumption of yogurt has been touted for its potential health benefits, with its probiotic properties linked to improved gut health and overall well-being. While the literature has extensively explored the physiological effects of yogurt consumption, its potential impact on human behavior and digital expression remains an area of limited investigation. It is in this backdrop that we embark on an exploration of the curious connection between yogurt consumption and the frequency of Google searches for the popular exasperated expression, 'i cant even.'
As the saying goes, "You can't run from probiotics, but you can-run for probiotics!" This pun, much like our study, aims to shed light on the lesser-known influence of yogurt on digital discourse. Our investigation seeks to uncover whether the consumption of this dairy product is associated with moments of incredulity and frustration, as depicted in the virtual realm through the ubiquitous phrase 'i cant even.'
The choice of 'i cant even' as the focus of our study is not arbitrary. In the age of digital communication, linguistic expressions serve as a barometer of prevailing emotions and reactions. Thus, understanding the factors that may influence the frequency of such expressions holds significance in uncovering the subtle yet significant influences of dietary habits on the digital landscape.
While our investigation may seem to take a lighthearted approach, the underlying implications are of serious note. Just as a balanced diet contributes to overall well-being, understanding the potential links between dietary choices and digital expressions may offer valuable insights into the interplay of physical and emotional health in the digital age.
With our study, we aim to churn the existing scholarly notions about the effects of yogurt consumption and set the stage for a more nuanced understanding of its potential influence on digital sentiment. As we delve into this unexplored territory, we invite readers to savor the unexpected parallels between a spoonful of yogurt and a relatable phrase encapsulating the exasperation of modern life.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have examined the physiological effects of yogurt consumption. Smith et al. (2015) observed the impact of probiotics on gut microbiota composition, while Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the potential role of yogurt in ameliorating lactose intolerance symptoms. However, the influence of yogurt intake on digital expressions of exasperation has received scant attention in the academic literature - until now.

In "The Power of Probiotics" and "Yogurt: A Digestive Delight," researchers delve into the potential health benefits of yogurt consumption, but fail to mention its impact on digital sentiment - a true culture shock, some might say. This oversight prompted our exploration into the intriguing correlation between yogurt consumption and the frequency of Google searches for the exasperated expression 'i cant even.'

Turning to non-fiction literary works for insights, "The Microbiome Solution" and "Gut: The Inside Story of Our Body's Most Underrated Organ" provide valuable perspectives on the interplay between diet and gut health. Curiously, they remain silent on the potential influence of yogurt on digital expressions of frustration.

In the realm of fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe" playfully explore existential dilemmas and the human experience, offering indirect parallels to the exasperated sentiment captured in 'i cant even.' Perhaps a spoonful of yogurt could have eased the characters' cosmic exasperation.

Television series such as "The Good Place" and "Brooklyn Nine-Nine" portray relatable human emotions and moments of incredulity, bearing implicit connections to the digital expression 'i cant even.' This parallel prompts speculation about the potential impact of yogurt on the characters' exasperation levels - a comedic premise sure to tickle the funny bone of many.

Returning to our investigation, the association between yogurt consumption and 'i cant even' searches presents a remarkably robust correlation. The authors find a correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. As we peel away the layers of this unexpected relationship, the full potential of yogurt in managing digital exasperation becomes increasingly apparent.

In conclusion, the integration of yogurt into one's dietary regimen may hold unforeseen implications for managing digital frustration, presenting a novel avenue for the application of probiotics. As we ponder the implications of our findings, let us remember that while yogurt may alleviate digital exasperation, it does little to improve one's tolerance for dad jokes - a challenge that remains unprobiotically insurmountable.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of yogurt has long been associated with digestive health and overall well-being. However, the impact of yogurt intake on public sentiment and expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere has remained largely unexplored. This study delves into the intriguing relationship between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even', a popular expression denoting overwhelming frustration or incredulity.

Using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2021 to investigate the potential link between yogurt consumption and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. Our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 (p < 0.01), suggesting a robust association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

The results of this study offer compelling evidence that a spoonful of yogurt may indeed soothe not only the stomach but also the exasperated soul, as reflected in the digital realm's vernacular expressions. Our research opens the door to further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, paving the whey for future investigations at the intersection of dietary habits and internet culture.

If our findings curd your interest, it's time to spread the word about the potential power of probiotics in managing digital exasperation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The consumption of yogurt has been touted for its potential health benefits, with its probiotic properties linked to improved gut health and overall well-being. While the literature has extensively explored the physiological effects of yogurt consumption, its potential impact on human behavior and digital expression remains an area of limited investigation. It is in this backdrop that we embark on an exploration of the curious connection between yogurt consumption and the frequency of Google searches for the popular exasperated expression, 'i cant even.'
As the saying goes, "You can't run from probiotics, but you can-run for probiotics!" This pun, much like our study, aims to shed light on the lesser-known influence of yogurt on digital discourse. Our investigation seeks to uncover whether the consumption of this dairy product is associated with moments of incredulity and frustration, as depicted in the virtual realm through the ubiquitous phrase 'i cant even.'
The choice of 'i cant even' as the focus of our study is not arbitrary. In the age of digital communication, linguistic expressions serve as a barometer of prevailing emotions and reactions. Thus, understanding the factors that may influence the frequency of such expressions holds significance in uncovering the subtle yet significant influences of dietary habits on the digital landscape.
While our investigation may seem to take a lighthearted approach, the underlying implications are of serious note. Just as a balanced diet contributes to overall well-being, understanding the potential links between dietary choices and digital expressions may offer valuable insights into the interplay of physical and emotional health in the digital age.
With our study, we aim to churn the existing scholarly notions about the effects of yogurt consumption and set the stage for a more nuanced understanding of its potential influence on digital sentiment. As we delve into this unexplored territory, we invite readers to savor the unexpected parallels between a spoonful of yogurt and a relatable phrase encapsulating the exasperation of modern life.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this research involved the collection and analysis of data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends. The data spanned the years 2004 to 2021, providing a comprehensive temporal scope for the investigation.

To begin, the research team meticulously curated data on yogurt consumption from the USDA, leveraging information from various sources, including production statistics, consumption patterns, and market trends. This involved sifting through an assortment of reports, databases, and dairy industry publications, similar to perusing a refrigerated section in search of the finest cultured dairy products.

The next stage of the methodology entailed extracting and refining Google search data for the phrase 'i cant even' from Google Trends. By entering the term into the search query and adjusting the parameters to capture the relevant timeframe, the team obtained a trove of digital data reflective of public sentiment and expressions of exasperation, analogous to engaging in a digital archaeological dig for modern colloquialisms.

Following the acquisition of the datasets, the statistical analysis was conducted utilizing software capable of interrogating the data and extracting meaningful insights. The correlation between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even' was assessed using sophisticated statistical methods, akin to conducting a taste test to discern the nuances between various yogurt flavors – though in this case, the flavors of interest were the p-values and correlation coefficients.

The methodology also involved controlling for potential confounding variables that could influence both yogurt consumption and online expressions of exasperation. Factors such as internet usage patterns, cultural trends, and technological advancements were considered to ensure that the observed relationship was not merely a spurious correlation, in a manner reminiscent of separating the whey from the curds in scientific analyses.

Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings, exploring alternate timeframes and subpopulations to ascertain the consistency of the observed association. This process resembled conducting multiple trials to confirm that a probiotic strain yields consistent results in fermenting milk into a desirable yogurt texture, thereby ensuring the reliability of the findings.

The methodology also encompassed a qualitative analysis of online discussions, memes, and social media posts related to yogurt consumption and 'i cant even' expressions to provide contextual insights into the observed quantitative associations. This qualitative component added depth to the research, much like the layered flavors in a parfait, revealing the nuanced interplay between dietary choices and digital sentiments.

In summary, the methodological approach employed in this study entailed a comprehensive and multi-faceted analysis, rigorously examining the potential links between yogurt consumption and expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere. The meticulous data gathering and stringent analytical procedures employed aimed to elucidate the unexpected and amusing connection between a dairy product and contemporary digital colloquialisms, in a manner befitting the fine balance of seriousness and whimsy inherent in academic inquiry.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of yogurt has long been associated with digestive health and overall well-being. However, the impact of yogurt intake on public sentiment and expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere has remained largely unexplored. This study delves into the intriguing relationship between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even', a popular expression denoting overwhelming frustration or incredulity.

Using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2021 to investigate the potential link between yogurt consumption and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. Our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 (p < 0.01), suggesting a robust association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

The results of this study offer compelling evidence that a spoonful of yogurt may indeed soothe not only the stomach but also the exasperated soul, as reflected in the digital realm's vernacular expressions. Our research opens the door to further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, paving the whey for future investigations at the intersection of dietary habits and internet culture.

If our findings curd your interest, it's time to spread the word about the potential power of probiotics in managing digital exasperation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have examined the physiological effects of yogurt consumption. Smith et al. (2015) observed the impact of probiotics on gut microbiota composition, while Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the potential role of yogurt in ameliorating lactose intolerance symptoms. However, the influence of yogurt intake on digital expressions of exasperation has received scant attention in the academic literature - until now.
In "The Power of Probiotics" and "Yogurt: A Digestive Delight," researchers delve into the potential health benefits of yogurt consumption, but fail to mention its impact on digital sentiment - a true culture shock, some might say. This oversight prompted our exploration into the intriguing correlation between yogurt consumption and the frequency of Google searches for the exasperated expression 'i cant even.'
Turning to non-fiction literary works for insights, "The Microbiome Solution" and "Gut: The Inside Story of Our Body's Most Underrated Organ" provide valuable perspectives on the interplay between diet and gut health. Curiously, they remain silent on the potential influence of yogurt on digital expressions of frustration.
In the realm of fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe" playfully explore existential dilemmas and the human experience, offering indirect parallels to the exasperated sentiment captured in 'i cant even.' Perhaps a spoonful of yogurt could have eased the characters' cosmic exasperation.
Television series such as "The Good Place" and "Brooklyn Nine-Nine" portray relatable human emotions and moments of incredulity, bearing implicit connections to the digital expression 'i cant even.' This parallel prompts speculation about the potential impact of yogurt on the characters' exasperation levels - a comedic premise sure to tickle the funny bone of many.
Returning to our investigation, the association between yogurt consumption and 'i cant even' searches presents a remarkably robust correlation. The authors find a correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 (p < 0.01), suggesting a compelling link between these seemingly disparate phenomena. As we peel away the layers of this unexpected relationship, the full potential of yogurt in managing digital exasperation becomes increasingly apparent.
In conclusion, the integration of yogurt into one's dietary regimen may hold unforeseen implications for managing digital frustration, presenting a novel avenue for the application of probiotics. As we ponder the implications of our findings, let us remember that while yogurt may alleviate digital exasperation, it does little to improve one's tolerance for dad jokes - a challenge that remains unprobiotically insurmountable.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. This strong positive correlation indicates a substantial relationship between the two variables, exceeding our initial expectations. It seems that yogurt may hold sway not only over the digestive system but also over expressions of exasperation in the digital domain.
Lest we delve too deeply into the yogurt of despair, it is worth underscoring the statistical significance of our findings. With a calculated r-squared value of 0.8822597 and a p-value of less than 0.01, these results provide robust evidence of the association between yogurt consumption and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. It appears that the link is not merely a flimsy, strained connection, but rather a solid, curdled relationship worthy of further exploration.
Fig. 1 visually demonstrates the compelling correlation between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. The scatterplot depicts a clear, ascending pattern, providing a graphical representation of the strong positive relationship observed in our analysis.
In light of these results, it appears that consuming yogurt may not only contribute to enhanced digestive well-being but also exert a potent influence on the expressions of frustration and incredulity in the digital sphere. The potential implications of these findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity and may merit consideration in the realms of public health and internet culture.
Before we sour the discussion with further statistical language, let us acknowledge the unexpected parallel between a humble dairy product and the exasperated sigh of the digital age. Who knew that a spoonful of yogurt could potentially ease not only the stomach but also the virtual exasperation of modern life?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of the present study provide strong support for the previously unexplored connection between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Our findings align with prior research indicating the far-reaching effects of yogurt intake, expanding the realm of its influence from gut health to the digital expression of exasperation.

The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 (p < 0.01) between yogurt consumption and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches underscores the robustness of this relationship. In doing so, it affirms the prospect that a spoonful of yogurt may indeed hold sway not only over the digestive system but also over the exasperated soul in the digital domain.

While the significant correlation observed may seem improbable at first glance, it highlights the need to remain open-minded in exploring uncharted territories of dietary and cultural influences. The unexpected bond between yogurt and digital exasperation serves as a reminder that the seemingly mundane aspects of daily life may harbor surprising connections.

Some might say that the potency of yogurt in managing digital exasperation is udderly remarkable, as it adds a new layer to our understanding of the intricate interplay between dietary habits and emotional expressions. This unexpected association invites further inquiry into the potential mechanisms underlying its existence, gestating the fermented inquiry into unexplored facets of human behavior.

Returning to the literature review, the insights gleaned from non-fiction literary works and television series with relatable human emotions and moments of incredulity subtly hinted at the subtle link between yogurt consumption and the digital expression 'i cant even.' Our results substantiate these implicit connections, lending empirical weight to the speculative musings prompted by these cultural references.

The strength of the correlation coefficient, coupled with the statistical significance of the findings, dispels any notion of this relationship being just another whimsical association. Rather, it suggests a profound linkage worthy of further investigation, sparking a flicker of excitement at the prospect of untangling the threads of this intriguing correlation.

As we peel back the layers of this unexpected relationship, the full potential of yogurt in managing digital exasperation begins to crystallize. The implications of our findings extend beyond statistical curiosity, prompting consideration of the integration of yogurt consumption into interventions aimed at modulating digital expressions of frustration and incredulity.

As we conclude this discussion, let us not forget that while yogurt may assuage digital exasperation, it won't necessarily ferment one's appreciation for dad jokes - a testy conundrum that remains unprobiotically insurmountable.

In the spirit of mycological inquiries, this unexpected relationship between yogurt consumption and 'i cant even' searches invites further exploration, as we endeavor to stir the pot and churn out new insights at the lactose-intolerant intersection of dietary habits and digital culture.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The consumption of yogurt has long been associated with digestive health and overall well-being. However, the impact of yogurt intake on public sentiment and expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere has remained largely unexplored. This study delves into the intriguing relationship between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even', a popular expression denoting overwhelming frustration or incredulity.

Using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2021 to investigate the potential link between yogurt consumption and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. Our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 (p < 0.01), suggesting a robust association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

The results of this study offer compelling evidence that a spoonful of yogurt may indeed soothe not only the stomach but also the exasperated soul, as reflected in the digital realm's vernacular expressions. Our research opens the door to further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, paving the whey for future investigations at the intersection of dietary habits and internet culture.

If our findings curd your interest, it's time to spread the word about the potential power of probiotics in managing digital exasperation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The consumption of yogurt has been touted for its potential health benefits, with its probiotic properties linked to improved gut health and overall well-being. While the literature has extensively explored the physiological effects of yogurt consumption, its potential impact on human behavior and digital expression remains an area of limited investigation. It is in this backdrop that we embark on an exploration of the curious connection between yogurt consumption and the frequency of Google searches for the popular exasperated expression, 'i cant even.'
As the saying goes, "You can't run from probiotics, but you can-run for probiotics!" This pun, much like our study, aims to shed light on the lesser-known influence of yogurt on digital discourse. Our investigation seeks to uncover whether the consumption of this dairy product is associated with moments of incredulity and frustration, as depicted in the virtual realm through the ubiquitous phrase 'i cant even.'
The choice of 'i cant even' as the focus of our study is not arbitrary. In the age of digital communication, linguistic expressions serve as a barometer of prevailing emotions and reactions. Thus, understanding the factors that may influence the frequency of such expressions holds significance in uncovering the subtle yet significant influences of dietary habits on the digital landscape.
While our investigation may seem to take a lighthearted approach, the underlying implications are of serious note. Just as a balanced diet contributes to overall well-being, understanding the potential links between dietary choices and digital expressions may offer valuable insights into the interplay of physical and emotional health in the digital age.
With our study, we aim to churn the existing scholarly notions about the effects of yogurt consumption and set the stage for a more nuanced understanding of its potential influence on digital sentiment. As we delve into this unexplored territory, we invite readers to savor the unexpected parallels between a spoonful of yogurt and a relatable phrase encapsulating the exasperation of modern life.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. This strong positive correlation indicates a substantial relationship between the two variables, exceeding our initial expectations. It seems that yogurt may hold sway not only over the digestive system but also over expressions of exasperation in the digital domain.
Lest we delve too deeply into the yogurt of despair, it is worth underscoring the statistical significance of our findings. With a calculated r-squared value of 0.8822597 and a p-value of less than 0.01, these results provide robust evidence of the association between yogurt consumption and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. It appears that the link is not merely a flimsy, strained connection, but rather a solid, curdled relationship worthy of further exploration.
Fig. 1 visually demonstrates the compelling correlation between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even'. The scatterplot depicts a clear, ascending pattern, providing a graphical representation of the strong positive relationship observed in our analysis.
In light of these results, it appears that consuming yogurt may not only contribute to enhanced digestive well-being but also exert a potent influence on the expressions of frustration and incredulity in the digital sphere. The potential implications of these findings extend beyond mere statistical curiosity and may merit consideration in the realms of public health and internet culture.
Before we sour the discussion with further statistical language, let us acknowledge the unexpected parallel between a humble dairy product and the exasperated sigh of the digital age. Who knew that a spoonful of yogurt could potentially ease not only the stomach but also the virtual exasperation of modern life?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has revealed a compelling and robust association between yogurt consumption and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. The strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868, coupled with the r-squared value of 0.8822597 and a p-value of less than 0.01, firmly establishes the significant relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that the impact of yogurt extends beyond the realm of gastrointestinal well-being to encompass the nuanced expressions of exasperation within the digital sphere. Who would have thought that a dairy product could possess such influence over virtual venting? It appears that the spoonful of yogurt not only serves the stomach but also potentially alleviates the exasperated soul, providing a whole new meaning to the term "comfort food."

The implications of our findings extend beyond the statistical realm, hinting at potential contributions to public health interventions and digital sentiment analysis. The curdled relationship between yogurt consumption and digital exasperation offers a unique lens through which to view the overlap between dietary habits and online behavior. As we reflect upon the unexpected parallels between a humble dairy product and the colloquial expressions of modern exasperation, one cannot help but marvel at the potential influence of a simple spoonful of yogurt in the complex landscape of digital communication.

Given the compelling nature of our results, it seems that no more research is needed in this area. Our findings stand as a testament to the intriguing connections that can be uncovered at the intersection of dietary choices and digital discourse. However, as with all things in the world of academia, there is always room for more cheese... I mean, more research.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Microbiome Studies

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Gut Health and Internet Culture Research

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation with an abstract of The consumption of yogurt has long been associated with digestive health and overall well-being. However, the impact of yogurt intake on public sentiment and expressions of exasperation in the digital sphere has remained largely unexplored. This study delves into the intriguing relationship between yogurt consumption and Google searches for 'i cant even', a popular expression denoting overwhelming frustration or incredulity.
Using data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2021 to investigate the potential link between yogurt consumption and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. Our findings revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9392868 (p < 0.01), suggesting a robust association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
The results of this study offer compelling evidence that a spoonful of yogurt may indeed soothe not only the stomach but also the exasperated soul, as reflected in the digital realm's vernacular expressions. Our research opens the door to further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship, paving the whey for future investigations at the intersection of dietary habits and internet culture.
If our findings curd your interest, it's time to spread the word about the potential power of probiotics in managing digital exasperation.

ChatGPT:

probiotics, yogurt consumption, digital sentiment, 'i cant even' searches, correlation analysis, dietary habits, internet culture, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Google Trends, digestive health, public sentiment, exasperation, incredulity, robust association, vernacular expressions, dietary habits, internet culture, probiotics, managing digital exasperation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Yogurt consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Yogurt in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Yogurt consumption

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: ^{See full details} Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.9392868 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.8822597 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Yogurt consumption) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.7E-9.^Show 0.0000000076653479877698550000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 7.7E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 130,457,221 random variables^Note You don't actually need 130 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021
Yogurt consumption (Pounds per person)	9.2	10.3	11.1	11.6	11.7	12.5	13.4	13.6	14	14.9	14.9	14.4	13.7	13.7	13.6	13.4	13.6	14.3
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)	11.8333	24	33.5833	32	34.75	37.5	60.25	63.3333	54.3333	63.25	70.8333	74.75	71.1667	72.4167	63	55.9167	64.0833	65

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. ^Note Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9.2,10.3,11.1,11.6,11.7,12.5,13.4,13.6,14,14.9,14.9,14.4,13.7,13.7,13.6,13.4,13.6,14.3,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,])
array_1_name = "Yogurt consumption"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Yogurt consumption
Line chart for only Google searches for 'i cant even'
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Probiotics and Problems: The Yogurt-Google 'I Can't Even' Correlation

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!

Correlation ID: 2203 · Black Variable ID: 568 · Red Variable ID: 1525


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: