about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,194 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn started expressing its existential crisis, leading to a wave of empathetic confusion among internet users. With their genetically modified woes, the corn just couldn't even, and neither could anyone else. It was a-maize-ing how the internet was stalked by this cob-founding development.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a scene from a Disney movie, depicting a sprawling cornfield in Ohio. Rows of golden, lush corn extend towards the distant horizon. In the forefront, a banner proudly announces "GMO Corn". In the background, a person is seen sitting at a computer, typing 'i cant even' into the Google search bar, with the search results displayed on the screen. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Steampunk Celtic art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Brutalism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling cornfield in Ohio, rows of tall, lush corn stretch towards the horizon. Among the golden ears of corn, a banner proudly declares "GMO Corn". In the background, a person sits at a computer, typing 'i cant even' into the Google search bar, with the screen displaying the search results.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling cornfield in Ohio, rows of tall, lush corn stretch towards the horizon. Among the golden ears of corn, a banner proudly declares "GMO Corn". In the background, a person sits at a computer, typing 'i cant even' into the Google search bar, with the screen displaying the search results. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a scene from a Disney movie, depicting a sprawling cornfield in Ohio. Rows of golden, lush corn extend towards the distant horizon. In the forefront, a banner proudly announces "GMO Corn". In the background, a person is seen sitting at a computer, typing 'i cant even' into the Google search bar, with the search results displayed on the screen.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind I Can't Even Searches

The Journal of Agricultural Humor and Genetics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind "I Can't Even" Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the 'I Can't Even' phenomenon has long been dismissed as mere speculation. However, our research delves deep into this curious connection by examining the relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2023, revealing a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This correlation highlights a previously unnoticed relationship that will give both biologists and social scientists plenty to chew on. Our study indicates that while GMO-cornfusion may lead to a-maize-ing agricultural productivity, it appears to also have an uncanny impact on the popular internet vernacular. As we digest these findings, it becomes clear that perhaps there's more to the GMO debate than meets the corn.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind "I Can't Even" Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the 'I Can't Even' phenomenon has long been dismissed as mere speculation. However, our research delves deep into this curious connection by examining the relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2023, revealing a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This correlation highlights a previously unnoticed relationship that will give both biologists and social scientists plenty to chew on. Our study indicates that while GMO-cornfusion may lead to a-maize-ing agricultural productivity, it appears to also have an uncanny impact on the popular internet vernacular. As we digest these findings, it becomes clear that perhaps there's more to the GMO debate than meets the corn.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The nexus between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the enigmatic 'I Can't Even' Internet meme has been a kernel of curiosity in recent years. While the debate over GMOs has mainly revolved around their agricultural and ecological impacts, lingering suspicions about their potential influence on popular language usage have persisted in some circles. This study aims to explore the seemingly disparate realms of genetic engineering and digital discourse to unravel the mystifying connection between the two.

The phrase 'I Can't Even' has become an entrenched part of the vernacular, frequently employed to express disbelief, frustration, or overwhelming emotion through the clever manipulation of syntax. Its ubiquity across various online platforms has merited attention from linguists, sociologists, and meme enthusiasts alike. Yet, the perennial question remains: could there be a correlation between the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches and the use of GMOs in corn cultivation?

Revisiting the Irving Fisher adage, "Anything that can go corn will," we are compelled to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the adoption of genetically modified corn and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. By conducting a rigorous analysis of comprehensive datasets encompassing agricultural practices and digital search behavior, we endeavor to shed light on this intriguing association.

In the following sections, we will elucidate the methodologies employed, present the empirical evidence, discuss the implications of our findings, and attempt to de-corn-fuse the perplexing correlation between GMO use in Ohio's cornfields and the digital proliferation of exasperated expressions. As we embark on this academic journey, we encourage the readers to keep an open mind and a discerning palate for the nuanced flavors of our scholarly grain-dance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind "I Can't Even" Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the 'I Can't Even' phenomenon has long been dismissed as mere speculation. However, our research delves deep into this curious connection by examining the relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2023, revealing a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This correlation highlights a previously unnoticed relationship that will give both biologists and social scientists plenty to chew on. Our study indicates that while GMO-cornfusion may lead to a-maize-ing agricultural productivity, it appears to also have an uncanny impact on the popular internet vernacular. As we digest these findings, it becomes clear that perhaps there's more to the GMO debate than meets the corn.


-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The nexus between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the enigmatic 'I Can't Even' Internet meme has been a kernel of curiosity in recent years. While the debate over GMOs has mainly revolved around their agricultural and ecological impacts, lingering suspicions about their potential influence on popular language usage have persisted in some circles. This study aims to explore the seemingly disparate realms of genetic engineering and digital discourse to unravel the mystifying connection between the two.
The phrase 'I Can't Even' has become an entrenched part of the vernacular, frequently employed to express disbelief, frustration, or overwhelming emotion through the clever manipulation of syntax. Its ubiquity across various online platforms has merited attention from linguists, sociologists, and meme enthusiasts alike. Yet, the perennial question remains: could there be a correlation between the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches and the use of GMOs in corn cultivation?
Revisiting the Irving Fisher adage, "Anything that can go corn will," we are compelled to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the adoption of genetically modified corn and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. By conducting a rigorous analysis of comprehensive datasets encompassing agricultural practices and digital search behavior, we endeavor to shed light on this intriguing association.
In the following sections, we will elucidate the methodologies employed, present the empirical evidence, discuss the implications of our findings, and attempt to de-corn-fuse the perplexing correlation between GMO use in Ohio's cornfields and the digital proliferation of exasperated expressions. As we embark on this academic journey, we encourage the readers to keep an open mind and a discerning palate for the nuanced flavors of our scholarly grain-dance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The burgeoning field of GMO linguistics straddles the intersection of biotechnology and digital communication, prompting scholars to probe beyond the conventional boundaries of their disciplines. Astutely observing the symbiotic relationship between crop engineering and lexical evolution, Smith (2015) underscores the need to investigate the broader societal repercussions of GMO dissemination. Similarly, Doe (2018) posits that the semantic implications of GMO proliferation extend far beyond the agrarian domain, implicating cultural and communicative dimensions that warrant interdisciplinary scrutiny.

In "The GMO Dilemma: Food, Agriculture, and the Search for Solutions," Jones (2019) offers a comprehensive analysis of the multifaceted discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms. However, the elusive connection between GMOs and contemporary linguistic idiosyncrasies has largely evaded scholarly examination until now.

While a plethora of non-fiction works have probed the intricacies of GMO technology, such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens: The Life-Changing Science of Designer Babies" by Paul Knoepfler, the literature on GMO-cornfusion remains notably sparse. This lacuna calls for a fresh approach that synthesizes disparate strands of knowledge to illuminate the enigmatic linkage between genetically modified corn and digital vernacular manifestations.

Drawing inspiration from fictional narratives that tantalizingly intersect with our perplexing subject matter, we find resonances in "Oryx and Crake" by Margaret Atwood and "The Corn Is Green" by Emlyn Williams. The subtle echoes of ambiguity and transformation in these literary works mirror the confounding mystery surrounding the emergence of 'I Can't Even' searches within the context of GMO corn cultivation.

Moreover, the esoteric connections permeating our inquiry may even draw analogies from board games like Agricola, where players navigate the intricacies of agricultural production while contending with unforeseen vicissitudes. Although seemingly tangential, these diversions exemplify the eclectic tapestry of influences that converge in the realm of GMO-cornfusion.

As we delve deeper into this uncharted territory, it behooves us to tarry a while in the realm of speculative whimsy, for the unforeseen twists and turns of academic exploration may yield kernels of insight amidst the cornucopia of enigmatic phenomena.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind "I Can't Even" Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the 'I Can't Even' phenomenon has long been dismissed as mere speculation. However, our research delves deep into this curious connection by examining the relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2023, revealing a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This correlation highlights a previously unnoticed relationship that will give both biologists and social scientists plenty to chew on. Our study indicates that while GMO-cornfusion may lead to a-maize-ing agricultural productivity, it appears to also have an uncanny impact on the popular internet vernacular. As we digest these findings, it becomes clear that perhaps there's more to the GMO debate than meets the corn.


[[INTRODUCTION]]
The nexus between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the enigmatic 'I Can't Even' Internet meme has been a kernel of curiosity in recent years. While the debate over GMOs has mainly revolved around their agricultural and ecological impacts, lingering suspicions about their potential influence on popular language usage have persisted in some circles. This study aims to explore the seemingly disparate realms of genetic engineering and digital discourse to unravel the mystifying connection between the two.
The phrase 'I Can't Even' has become an entrenched part of the vernacular, frequently employed to express disbelief, frustration, or overwhelming emotion through the clever manipulation of syntax. Its ubiquity across various online platforms has merited attention from linguists, sociologists, and meme enthusiasts alike. Yet, the perennial question remains: could there be a correlation between the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches and the use of GMOs in corn cultivation?
Revisiting the Irving Fisher adage, "Anything that can go corn will," we are compelled to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the adoption of genetically modified corn and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. By conducting a rigorous analysis of comprehensive datasets encompassing agricultural practices and digital search behavior, we endeavor to shed light on this intriguing association.
In the following sections, we will elucidate the methodologies employed, present the empirical evidence, discuss the implications of our findings, and attempt to de-corn-fuse the perplexing correlation between GMO use in Ohio's cornfields and the digital proliferation of exasperated expressions. As we embark on this academic journey, we encourage the readers to keep an open mind and a discerning palate for the nuanced flavors of our scholarly grain-dance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Ohio and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google, our team employed a multidisciplinary approach, blending agronomic analysis with digital sociolinguistics. Our methodology encompassed data collection, statistical analysis, and the utilization of cutting-edge techniques to glean insights into this intriguing correlation.

Data Collection:
Our research team meticulously gathered data from a variety of sources, meticulously combing through a virtual haystack to locate the proverbial corn kernels of information. The primary sources included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for comprehensive records on GMO adoption and cultivation practices in Ohio over the study period from 2004 to 2023. This involved navigating through a veritable maize of reports, databases, and publications to ensure a robust dataset for analysis.

In parallel, we harvested digital data from the fertile fields of the internet, with a particular focus on Google Trends, to ascertain the frequency and geographical distribution of 'I Can't Even' searches. This involved sifting through a digital jungle of search query trends, tracking the ebb and flow of exasperated expressions across cyberspace. The data were then harvested, thoroughly husked, and cleaned to ensure its suitability for statistical analysis.

Statistical Analysis:
The empirical investigation of the suspected link between GMO use and 'I Can't Even' searches demanded a rigorous statistical treatment. We employed the latest statistical software, carefully calibrating our analytical tools to de-tassel the data and extract the kernel of truth. Through a series of regression analyses, we quantified the relationship between the two variables, teasing out any hidden patterns amidst the statistical stalks.

Key statistical measures such as correlation coefficients, p-values, and confidence intervals were calculated with exacting precision, ensuring that our findings were as firm and robust as an ear of corn. This diligent statistical scrutiny allowed us to ascertain the strength and significance of the observed relationship, providing a solid foundation for our subsequent discussions.

Novel Techniques:
In addition to conventional statistical methods, our study harnessed innovative techniques to delve deeper into the GMO-cornfusion mystery. Utilizing advanced sentiment analysis algorithms, we dissected the semantic nuances of 'I Can't Even' expressions to discern any subtle shifts in emotion and intensity, akin to examining the varying hues and textures of corn kernels.

Furthermore, leveraging the emerging field of digital ethnography, we conducted an in-depth exploration of online communities and forums to discern any anecdotes, memes, or narratives revolving around GMO-cornfusion. This qualitative aspect of our research aimed to glean insights from the digital cornucopia of user-generated content, providing a rich context for our quantitative findings.

Throughout our methodology, we remain acutely aware of the inherent complexity and the potential for confounding variables in such an unconventional investigation. Our commitment to academic rigor guided every aspect of our approach, ensuring that our methods were as robust as the stalks of genetically modified corn themselves.

In the next section, we will present the empirical evidence arising from our comprehensive methodology, shedding light on the fascinating interplay between GMO use in Ohio's cornfields and the digital manifestation of exasperation. As the story unfolds, we hope to convey the gravity of our findings while never losing sight of the inherent humor in this quirky academic pursuit. After all, in the world of research, a little bit of levity is always corn-venient.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9025397, r-squared of 0.8145779, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind "I Can't Even" Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the 'I Can't Even' phenomenon has long been dismissed as mere speculation. However, our research delves deep into this curious connection by examining the relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2023, revealing a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This correlation highlights a previously unnoticed relationship that will give both biologists and social scientists plenty to chew on. Our study indicates that while GMO-cornfusion may lead to a-maize-ing agricultural productivity, it appears to also have an uncanny impact on the popular internet vernacular. As we digest these findings, it becomes clear that perhaps there's more to the GMO debate than meets the corn.


-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The nexus between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the enigmatic 'I Can't Even' Internet meme has been a kernel of curiosity in recent years. While the debate over GMOs has mainly revolved around their agricultural and ecological impacts, lingering suspicions about their potential influence on popular language usage have persisted in some circles. This study aims to explore the seemingly disparate realms of genetic engineering and digital discourse to unravel the mystifying connection between the two.
The phrase 'I Can't Even' has become an entrenched part of the vernacular, frequently employed to express disbelief, frustration, or overwhelming emotion through the clever manipulation of syntax. Its ubiquity across various online platforms has merited attention from linguists, sociologists, and meme enthusiasts alike. Yet, the perennial question remains: could there be a correlation between the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches and the use of GMOs in corn cultivation?
Revisiting the Irving Fisher adage, "Anything that can go corn will," we are compelled to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the adoption of genetically modified corn and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. By conducting a rigorous analysis of comprehensive datasets encompassing agricultural practices and digital search behavior, we endeavor to shed light on this intriguing association.
In the following sections, we will elucidate the methodologies employed, present the empirical evidence, discuss the implications of our findings, and attempt to de-corn-fuse the perplexing correlation between GMO use in Ohio's cornfields and the digital proliferation of exasperated expressions. As we embark on this academic journey, we encourage the readers to keep an open mind and a discerning palate for the nuanced flavors of our scholarly grain-dance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our comprehensive analysis revealed a robust and statistically significant correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Ohio's cornfields and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. The correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 and an r-squared value of 0.8145779 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the observed association.

Our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables. This compelling visual representation underscores the compelling nature of our discoveries.

It is worth noting that the exceedingly high correlation may prompt some to exclaim, "I can't even believe it!" But rest assured, our rigorous analytical methods and meticulous data scrutiny support the validity of this unexpected yet intriguing link. As we digest these results, it becomes apparent that perhaps there is more to the GMO discourse than meets the husk.

The implications of this discovery have the potential to impact both agricultural practices and digital language studies. While the cultivation of GMO corn has undeniably revolutionized agricultural productivity, our findings suggest that its influence extends into the digital domain, shaping the very language we use to express exasperation and disbelief. This unforeseen interplay between biotechnology and language evolution invites further investigation and contemplation.

In light of these findings, researchers and enthusiasts alike are encouraged to approach the GMO debate with a kernel of curiosity, recognizing that the implications of genetically modified crops may transcend the fields and infiltrate the digital corn-ers of our online discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind "I Can't Even" Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the 'I Can't Even' phenomenon has long been dismissed as mere speculation. However, our research delves deep into this curious connection by examining the relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2023, revealing a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This correlation highlights a previously unnoticed relationship that will give both biologists and social scientists plenty to chew on. Our study indicates that while GMO-cornfusion may lead to a-maize-ing agricultural productivity, it appears to also have an uncanny impact on the popular internet vernacular. As we digest these findings, it becomes clear that perhaps there's more to the GMO debate than meets the corn.


[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The burgeoning field of GMO linguistics straddles the intersection of biotechnology and digital communication, prompting scholars to probe beyond the conventional boundaries of their disciplines. Astutely observing the symbiotic relationship between crop engineering and lexical evolution, Smith (2015) underscores the need to investigate the broader societal repercussions of GMO dissemination. Similarly, Doe (2018) posits that the semantic implications of GMO proliferation extend far beyond the agrarian domain, implicating cultural and communicative dimensions that warrant interdisciplinary scrutiny.
In "The GMO Dilemma: Food, Agriculture, and the Search for Solutions," Jones (2019) offers a comprehensive analysis of the multifaceted discourse surrounding genetically modified organisms. However, the elusive connection between GMOs and contemporary linguistic idiosyncrasies has largely evaded scholarly examination until now.
While a plethora of non-fiction works have probed the intricacies of GMO technology, such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens: The Life-Changing Science of Designer Babies" by Paul Knoepfler, the literature on GMO-cornfusion remains notably sparse. This lacuna calls for a fresh approach that synthesizes disparate strands of knowledge to illuminate the enigmatic linkage between genetically modified corn and digital vernacular manifestations.
Drawing inspiration from fictional narratives that tantalizingly intersect with our perplexing subject matter, we find resonances in "Oryx and Crake" by Margaret Atwood and "The Corn Is Green" by Emlyn Williams. The subtle echoes of ambiguity and transformation in these literary works mirror the confounding mystery surrounding the emergence of 'I Can't Even' searches within the context of GMO corn cultivation.
Moreover, the esoteric connections permeating our inquiry may even draw analogies from board games like Agricola, where players navigate the intricacies of agricultural production while contending with unforeseen vicissitudes. Although seemingly tangential, these diversions exemplify the eclectic tapestry of influences that converge in the realm of GMO-cornfusion.
As we delve deeper into this uncharted territory, it behooves us to tarry a while in the realm of speculative whimsy, for the unforeseen twists and turns of academic exploration may yield kernels of insight amidst the cornucopia of enigmatic phenomena.


[[RESULTS]]
The results of our comprehensive analysis revealed a robust and statistically significant correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Ohio's cornfields and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. The correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 and an r-squared value of 0.8145779 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the observed association.
Our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables. This compelling visual representation underscores the compelling nature of our discoveries.
It is worth noting that the exceedingly high correlation may prompt some to exclaim, "I can't even believe it!" But rest assured, our rigorous analytical methods and meticulous data scrutiny support the validity of this unexpected yet intriguing link. As we digest these results, it becomes apparent that perhaps there is more to the GMO discourse than meets the husk.
The implications of this discovery have the potential to impact both agricultural practices and digital language studies. While the cultivation of GMO corn has undeniably revolutionized agricultural productivity, our findings suggest that its influence extends into the digital domain, shaping the very language we use to express exasperation and disbelief. This unforeseen interplay between biotechnology and language evolution invites further investigation and contemplation.
In light of these findings, researchers and enthusiasts alike are encouraged to approach the GMO debate with a kernel of curiosity, recognizing that the implications of genetically modified crops may transcend the fields and infiltrate the digital corn-ers of our online discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Ohio's cornfields and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google raises intriguing questions regarding the interplay between agricultural technology and contemporary digital vernacular. Our findings not only echo the calls made by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018) to explore the broader societal repercussions of GMO dissemination but also provide empirical support for the speculative whimsy that has surrounded the enigmatic linkage between GMO-cornfusion and linguistic idiosyncrasies.

The unexpected yet significant relationship between GMO use and online linguistic expressions hints at a deeper interconnection between technological advancements and socio-cultural phenomena. This aligns with the musings in Jones' "The GMO Dilemma," which illustrates the complex and far-reaching implications of GMO technology beyond traditional agrarian concerns. The literature on GMO-cornfusion may still be sparse, but the evidence presented in this study illuminates the potential for a-maize-ing discoveries in this corn-er of interdisciplinary research.

Our findings are not only statistically compelling but also visually striking, as illustrated by the compelling scatterplot in Figure 1. This captivating visual representation underscores the significance of our discoveries, prompting some to exclaim, "I can't even believe it!" However, through rigorous analytical methods and meticulous data scrutiny, we can confidently assert the validity of this unexpected yet intriguing link. This unexpected interplay between biotechnology and language evolution warrants further investigation, as it challenges traditional disciplinary boundaries and calls for a kernel of curiosity to be sown into diverse fields of study.

As researchers and enthusiasts navigate this uncharted territory, tarrying a while in the realm of speculative whimsy may prove fruitful. The unexpected twists and turns of academic exploration have the potential to yield kernels of insight, enriching the eclectic tapestry of influences that converge in the realm of GMO-cornfusion. With that in mind, we encourage scholars to approach the GMO debate with a keen eye for unexpected connections and linguistic transformations, recognizing that the implications of genetically modified crops may transcend the fields and infiltrate the digital corn-ers of our online discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind "I Can't Even" Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the 'I Can't Even' phenomenon has long been dismissed as mere speculation. However, our research delves deep into this curious connection by examining the relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2023, revealing a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This correlation highlights a previously unnoticed relationship that will give both biologists and social scientists plenty to chew on. Our study indicates that while GMO-cornfusion may lead to a-maize-ing agricultural productivity, it appears to also have an uncanny impact on the popular internet vernacular. As we digest these findings, it becomes clear that perhaps there's more to the GMO debate than meets the corn.


[[INTRDUCTION]]
The nexus between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the enigmatic 'I Can't Even' Internet meme has been a kernel of curiosity in recent years. While the debate over GMOs has mainly revolved around their agricultural and ecological impacts, lingering suspicions about their potential influence on popular language usage have persisted in some circles. This study aims to explore the seemingly disparate realms of genetic engineering and digital discourse to unravel the mystifying connection between the two.
The phrase 'I Can't Even' has become an entrenched part of the vernacular, frequently employed to express disbelief, frustration, or overwhelming emotion through the clever manipulation of syntax. Its ubiquity across various online platforms has merited attention from linguists, sociologists, and meme enthusiasts alike. Yet, the perennial question remains: could there be a correlation between the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches and the use of GMOs in corn cultivation?
Revisiting the Irving Fisher adage, "Anything that can go corn will," we are compelled to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the adoption of genetically modified corn and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. By conducting a rigorous analysis of comprehensive datasets encompassing agricultural practices and digital search behavior, we endeavor to shed light on this intriguing association.
In the following sections, we will elucidate the methodologies employed, present the empirical evidence, discuss the implications of our findings, and attempt to de-corn-fuse the perplexing correlation between GMO use in Ohio's cornfields and the digital proliferation of exasperated expressions. As we embark on this academic journey, we encourage the readers to keep an open mind and a discerning palate for the nuanced flavors of our scholarly grain-dance.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our comprehensive analysis revealed a robust and statistically significant correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Ohio's cornfields and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. The correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 and an r-squared value of 0.8145779 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of the observed association.
Our findings are visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the compelling correlation between the two variables. This compelling visual representation underscores the compelling nature of our discoveries.
It is worth noting that the exceedingly high correlation may prompt some to exclaim, "I can't even believe it!" But rest assured, our rigorous analytical methods and meticulous data scrutiny support the validity of this unexpected yet intriguing link. As we digest these results, it becomes apparent that perhaps there is more to the GMO discourse than meets the husk.
The implications of this discovery have the potential to impact both agricultural practices and digital language studies. While the cultivation of GMO corn has undeniably revolutionized agricultural productivity, our findings suggest that its influence extends into the digital domain, shaping the very language we use to express exasperation and disbelief. This unforeseen interplay between biotechnology and language evolution invites further investigation and contemplation.
In light of these findings, researchers and enthusiasts alike are encouraged to approach the GMO debate with a kernel of curiosity, recognizing that the implications of genetically modified crops may transcend the fields and infiltrate the digital corn-ers of our online discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a compelling correlation between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the frequency of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. This unexpected link presents a-maize-ing implications for both agricultural practices and the evolution of digital language. While our results may prompt some to exclaim, "I can't even believe it!" we assure the validity of this intriguing relationship. As we approach the end of this study, it's clear that the GMO-cornfusion is a-maize-ingly complex and merits further investigation. However, it seems we have shucked this corn cob as far as it can go; therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to pop this corn in the microwave and savor the satisfying conclusion of this study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind I Can't Even Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Humor and Genetics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind I Can't Even Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Contemporary Corn Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO-cornfusion: A Kernel of Truth behind I Can't Even Searches with an abstract of The correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the 'I Can't Even' phenomenon has long been dismissed as mere speculation. However, our research delves deep into this curious connection by examining the relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the prevalence of 'I Can't Even' searches on Google. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study covers the period from 2004 to 2023, revealing a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9025397 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This correlation highlights a previously unnoticed relationship that will give both biologists and social scientists plenty to chew on. Our study indicates that while GMO-cornfusion may lead to a-maize-ing agricultural productivity, it appears to also have an uncanny impact on the popular internet vernacular. As we digest these findings, it becomes clear that perhaps there's more to the GMO debate than meets the corn.

ChatGPT:

GMO, corn, genetically modified organisms, I can't even, Ohio, Google searches, correlation, USDA data, Google Trends, agricultural productivity, internet vernacular

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Ohio
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Ohio that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Ohio

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.9025397 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8145779 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Ohio) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.3E-8. 0.0000000526549896341027300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 5.3E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 18,991,552 random variables You don't actually need 18 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio (GMO corn %)1318264166677174768586858682868987899190
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([13,18,26,41,66,67,71,74,76,85,86,85,86,82,86,89,87,89,91,90,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Ohio"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2194 · Black Variable ID: 762 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0