about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,185 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Orlando and the second variable is Google searches for 'snoop dog'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Snoop Dogg's high tolerance was finally put to good use as he filtered out air pollutants like a boss, leading to a surge in his own popularity. "Just 'drop it like it's hot' was Snoop's advice to the air pollution problem."

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a grayscale image in the style of a vintage newspaper illustration. Depict the city skyline of Orlando partly obscured by smog, with buildings and trees appearing hazy and blurred in the background. In the foreground, show people sitting at their computers in a dimly lit room, typing "snoop dog" into Google search, with their screens emitting a soft glow. The focus of the image should be on capturing the contrast between the polluted cityscape and the individuals engaged in online activity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Poor air quality in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism 3D Pixar Style Vaporwave A black-and-white newspaper illustration Cubism
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Poor air quality in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Orlando, the city skyline is barely visible through a haze of smog, with buildings and trees appearing hazy and obscured. At the same time, people are sitting at their computers, typing in "snoop dog" into Google search, their screens glowing in the dimly lit room.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In Orlando, the city skyline is barely visible through a haze of smog, with buildings and trees appearing hazy and obscured. At the same time, people are sitting at their computers, typing in "snoop dog" into Google search, their screens glowing in the dimly lit room. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a grayscale image in the style of a vintage newspaper illustration. Depict the city skyline of Orlando partly obscured by smog, with buildings and trees appearing hazy and blurred in the background. In the foreground, show people sitting at their computers in a dimly lit room, typing "snoop dog" into Google search, with their screens emitting a soft glow. The focus of the image should be on capturing the contrast between the polluted cityscape and the individuals engaged in online activity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Orlando positively influenced snoop dog (Google searches for 'snoop dog'). Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'

The Journal of Urban Air Quality Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8731882 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the surprising correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper Snoop Dogg. Despite the seemingly disparate topics, our analysis reveals a striking connection between the two variables over the period from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as air pollution in Orlando increased, so did the interest in Snoop Dogg on the internet. We delve into the potential reasons behind this unexpected relationship, from the impact of air pollution on cognitive function to the possibility of a secret Snoop Dogg fan club within the Environmental Protection Agency. This study sheds light on the quirky, interconnected facets of modern society and serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the surprising correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper Snoop Dogg. Despite the seemingly disparate topics, our analysis reveals a striking connection between the two variables over the period from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as air pollution in Orlando increased, so did the interest in Snoop Dogg on the internet. We delve into the potential reasons behind this unexpected relationship, from the impact of air pollution on cognitive function to the possibility of a secret Snoop Dogg fan club within the Environmental Protection Agency. This study sheds light on the quirky, interconnected facets of modern society and serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

Beethoven had his Fifth Symphony, Sherlock Holmes had his pipe and, apparently, Orlando has its air pollution and Snoop Dogg. In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of air quality and hip-hop culture to uncover the perplexing correlation between air pollution levels in the City Beautiful and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rapper Snoop Dogg.

It all started with a hunch - or perhaps a whiff of something in the air - that there might be something more than meets the eye, or the nose, in the Orlando atmosphere. Now, we know what you might be thinking, "What on earth could air pollution possibly have to do with Snoop Dogg? Are the fumes making people hallucinate that they're partying with the Doggfather himself?" Well, fear not, dear reader, for this academic escapade aims to explore this bizarre association with the rigors of scientific inquiry and a sprinkle of humor.

Before delving into the statistical intricacies and brain-teasing analyses, it's only fair to acknowledge the initial disbelief and snarky skepticism that greeted our research proposal. "Has science finally lost its marbles," they'd mock. "Is this some sneaky ploy to sneak hip-hop references into the annals of academic literature?" they'd chuckle. But we stood firm, unfazed by the raised eyebrows and knowing smirks, determined to unlock the secrets hidden amid the ambient pollutants of Orlando.

As we pore over the data, a remarkable pattern emerges - a correlation coefficient that exceeds even our wildest expectations. What could this mean? Is there a logical explanation, or did we simply inhale too many statistical fumes? Join us in this scientific rollercoaster, where we examine the effects of air pollution on cognitive functions, speculate about the Snoop Dogg fan club surreptitiously lurking in government agencies, and even ponder the possibility of Snoop Dogg himself being a secret Orlando air quality enthusiast.

So, fasten your seatbelts and buckle up for a journey through the uncharted territory of quirky connections and the peculiar mysteries that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disjointed variables. After all, as the great Snoop Dogg once said, "It ain't no fun if the homies can't have none," and here in the world of academia, we're all about sharing the fun and the unexpected discoveries.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the surprising correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper Snoop Dogg. Despite the seemingly disparate topics, our analysis reveals a striking connection between the two variables over the period from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as air pollution in Orlando increased, so did the interest in Snoop Dogg on the internet. We delve into the potential reasons behind this unexpected relationship, from the impact of air pollution on cognitive function to the possibility of a secret Snoop Dogg fan club within the Environmental Protection Agency. This study sheds light on the quirky, interconnected facets of modern society and serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Beethoven had his Fifth Symphony, Sherlock Holmes had his pipe and, apparently, Orlando has its air pollution and Snoop Dogg. In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of air quality and hip-hop culture to uncover the perplexing correlation between air pollution levels in the City Beautiful and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rapper Snoop Dogg.
It all started with a hunch - or perhaps a whiff of something in the air - that there might be something more than meets the eye, or the nose, in the Orlando atmosphere. Now, we know what you might be thinking, "What on earth could air pollution possibly have to do with Snoop Dogg? Are the fumes making people hallucinate that they're partying with the Doggfather himself?" Well, fear not, dear reader, for this academic escapade aims to explore this bizarre association with the rigors of scientific inquiry and a sprinkle of humor.
Before delving into the statistical intricacies and brain-teasing analyses, it's only fair to acknowledge the initial disbelief and snarky skepticism that greeted our research proposal. "Has science finally lost its marbles," they'd mock. "Is this some sneaky ploy to sneak hip-hop references into the annals of academic literature?" they'd chuckle. But we stood firm, unfazed by the raised eyebrows and knowing smirks, determined to unlock the secrets hidden amid the ambient pollutants of Orlando.
As we pore over the data, a remarkable pattern emerges - a correlation coefficient that exceeds even our wildest expectations. What could this mean? Is there a logical explanation, or did we simply inhale too many statistical fumes? Join us in this scientific rollercoaster, where we examine the effects of air pollution on cognitive functions, speculate about the Snoop Dogg fan club surreptitiously lurking in government agencies, and even ponder the possibility of Snoop Dogg himself being a secret Orlando air quality enthusiast.
So, fasten your seatbelts and buckle up for a journey through the uncharted territory of quirky connections and the peculiar mysteries that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disjointed variables. After all, as the great Snoop Dogg once said, "It ain't no fun if the homies can't have none," and here in the world of academia, we're all about sharing the fun and the unexpected discoveries.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the perplexing correlation between air pollution in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for Snoop Dogg has incited uproarious curiosity within academic spheres. This unusual linkage, most decidedly not coined at an academic conference on the empirical advantages of hip-hop, has propelled numerous researchers to explore its underlying causes and implications.

In "Pollution Perspectives: Trends in Urban Environments," Smith et al. present a comprehensive analysis of air pollution levels in major American cities, including Orlando. Their findings elucidate the concerning escalation of particulate matter and ozone concentrations in the region. Meanwhile, Doe's "Urban Air Quality and Human Health" delves into the cognitive impairments associated with prolonged exposure to air pollutants, prompting contemplation about the potential impact on individuals' search behaviors.

Venturing further into the juncture of urban environments and cultural phenomena, Jones et al. put forth a thought-provoking proposition in "Hip-Hop and Urban Space." Their work explores the intertwining dynamics of hip-hop culture and the locality in which it thrives. Although originally devoid of empirical analyses concerning air quality, it sets the stage for a whimsical segue into our unexpected inquiry.

Expanding our purview, "The_Doggfather: A Musical Odyssey" by Biographer exemplifies the significance of Snoop Dogg's influence on society, offering an engrossing dissection of his iconic stature in popular culture. Conversely, "Rhythms of Respiratory Responses" by Pulmonologist sheds light on the physiological repercussions of air pollutants, steering us toward the audacious intersection of these ostensibly disparate domains.

As we delve deeper into the annals of unconventional literature, our pursuits led us to some truly outlandish realms. We combed through fictitious works like "Orlando’s Ozone Obsession: A Dogg's Tale," a whimsical satire that paints a fanciful narrative of the city's infatuation with air pollution and Snoop Dogg. Subsequently, we stumbled upon a series of irrelevant sources, including an insightful analysis of existential philosophy in the self-checkout line and a purportedly accidental foray into the universe's enigma as elucidated by grocery store receipts.

Thus, armed with a peculiar amalgamation of fact and facetiousness, we embark on this rib-tickling journey through the interconnectedness of environmental quality and rap legend fandom. As we venture forth into the empirical quagmire of whimsy, may we approach our findings with both gravitas and the occasional chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the surprising correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper Snoop Dogg. Despite the seemingly disparate topics, our analysis reveals a striking connection between the two variables over the period from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as air pollution in Orlando increased, so did the interest in Snoop Dogg on the internet. We delve into the potential reasons behind this unexpected relationship, from the impact of air pollution on cognitive function to the possibility of a secret Snoop Dogg fan club within the Environmental Protection Agency. This study sheds light on the quirky, interconnected facets of modern society and serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Beethoven had his Fifth Symphony, Sherlock Holmes had his pipe and, apparently, Orlando has its air pollution and Snoop Dogg. In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of air quality and hip-hop culture to uncover the perplexing correlation between air pollution levels in the City Beautiful and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rapper Snoop Dogg.
It all started with a hunch - or perhaps a whiff of something in the air - that there might be something more than meets the eye, or the nose, in the Orlando atmosphere. Now, we know what you might be thinking, "What on earth could air pollution possibly have to do with Snoop Dogg? Are the fumes making people hallucinate that they're partying with the Doggfather himself?" Well, fear not, dear reader, for this academic escapade aims to explore this bizarre association with the rigors of scientific inquiry and a sprinkle of humor.
Before delving into the statistical intricacies and brain-teasing analyses, it's only fair to acknowledge the initial disbelief and snarky skepticism that greeted our research proposal. "Has science finally lost its marbles," they'd mock. "Is this some sneaky ploy to sneak hip-hop references into the annals of academic literature?" they'd chuckle. But we stood firm, unfazed by the raised eyebrows and knowing smirks, determined to unlock the secrets hidden amid the ambient pollutants of Orlando.
As we pore over the data, a remarkable pattern emerges - a correlation coefficient that exceeds even our wildest expectations. What could this mean? Is there a logical explanation, or did we simply inhale too many statistical fumes? Join us in this scientific rollercoaster, where we examine the effects of air pollution on cognitive functions, speculate about the Snoop Dogg fan club surreptitiously lurking in government agencies, and even ponder the possibility of Snoop Dogg himself being a secret Orlando air quality enthusiast.
So, fasten your seatbelts and buckle up for a journey through the uncharted territory of quirky connections and the peculiar mysteries that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disjointed variables. After all, as the great Snoop Dogg once said, "It ain't no fun if the homies can't have none," and here in the world of academia, we're all about sharing the fun and the unexpected discoveries.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Given the unorthodox nature of our research topic, the methodology employed in this study took a page from Sherlock Holmes' book of unconventional investigative tactics. We embarked on a multidimensional data-gathering mission, traversing the digital landscapes of the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends with the precision of a data-seeking missile.

To begin with, we collected air quality data from Orlando, Florida, provided by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These data included measurements of various air pollutants, such as nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and airborne particles. We chose this approach to ensure a comprehensive overview of the atmospheric conditions in the region, assembling a virtual symphony of pollutants worthy of a Beethoven composition.

Simultaneously, we delved into the wondrous realm of Google Trends, harvesting the search frequency data for none other than the illustrious Snoop Dogg. With each query regarding one of the most iconic names in the rap industry, we captured the ebbs and flows of public interest, akin to navigating the tumultuous waves of hip-hop enthusiasm – much to the bemusement of our more traditional colleagues.

The time frame for our study spanned from 2004 to 2018, encapsulating a significant chunk of the contemporary digital era. This duration allowed us to capture both the subtle shifts in air quality and the ebb and flow of Snoop Dogg's online presence, akin to a statistical dance that only the most astute researchers can lead.

The collected data underwent a meticulous process of validation and cleansing, akin to removing the unsavoury bits from a ripe piece of statistical fruit. We applied rigorous quality checks, assessing the integrity and consistency of the datasets to ensure their suitability for robust analysis.

In order to gauge the correlation between air pollution and Google searches for 'Snoop Dogg', we employed a variety of statistical methods, including Pearson correlation coefficient and time series analysis. These tools enabled us to unearth the intriguing relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, bringing forth new insights and prompting more than a few raised eyebrows during our research team meetings.

With this approach, we navigated the labyrinthine passages of scientific inquiry, flexing our statistical muscles and engaging in the delightful dance of correlation analysis. Our methodology encapsulated both the rigors of empirical investigation and the joy of uncovering unexpected connections, reminiscent of a detective unearthing clues in a thrilling mystery novel.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8731882, r-squared of 0.7624576, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the surprising correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper Snoop Dogg. Despite the seemingly disparate topics, our analysis reveals a striking connection between the two variables over the period from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as air pollution in Orlando increased, so did the interest in Snoop Dogg on the internet. We delve into the potential reasons behind this unexpected relationship, from the impact of air pollution on cognitive function to the possibility of a secret Snoop Dogg fan club within the Environmental Protection Agency. This study sheds light on the quirky, interconnected facets of modern society and serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Beethoven had his Fifth Symphony, Sherlock Holmes had his pipe and, apparently, Orlando has its air pollution and Snoop Dogg. In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of air quality and hip-hop culture to uncover the perplexing correlation between air pollution levels in the City Beautiful and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rapper Snoop Dogg.
It all started with a hunch - or perhaps a whiff of something in the air - that there might be something more than meets the eye, or the nose, in the Orlando atmosphere. Now, we know what you might be thinking, "What on earth could air pollution possibly have to do with Snoop Dogg? Are the fumes making people hallucinate that they're partying with the Doggfather himself?" Well, fear not, dear reader, for this academic escapade aims to explore this bizarre association with the rigors of scientific inquiry and a sprinkle of humor.
Before delving into the statistical intricacies and brain-teasing analyses, it's only fair to acknowledge the initial disbelief and snarky skepticism that greeted our research proposal. "Has science finally lost its marbles," they'd mock. "Is this some sneaky ploy to sneak hip-hop references into the annals of academic literature?" they'd chuckle. But we stood firm, unfazed by the raised eyebrows and knowing smirks, determined to unlock the secrets hidden amid the ambient pollutants of Orlando.
As we pore over the data, a remarkable pattern emerges - a correlation coefficient that exceeds even our wildest expectations. What could this mean? Is there a logical explanation, or did we simply inhale too many statistical fumes? Join us in this scientific rollercoaster, where we examine the effects of air pollution on cognitive functions, speculate about the Snoop Dogg fan club surreptitiously lurking in government agencies, and even ponder the possibility of Snoop Dogg himself being a secret Orlando air quality enthusiast.
So, fasten your seatbelts and buckle up for a journey through the uncharted territory of quirky connections and the peculiar mysteries that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disjointed variables. After all, as the great Snoop Dogg once said, "It ain't no fun if the homies can't have none," and here in the world of academia, we're all about sharing the fun and the unexpected discoveries.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends has revealed a surprising and strong correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist Snoop Dogg from 2004 to 2018.

The correlation coefficient between air pollution and Snoop Dogg searches was found to be a whopping 0.8731882. If this correlation were any stronger, we'd be suspecting that the pollutants were surreptitiously ghostwriting rap lyrics! The r-squared value of 0.7624576 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship, indicating that a staggering 76.25% of the variability in Snoop Dogg searches in Orlando can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. It's as if Orlando's pollution is providing the perfect beat for Snoop Dogg's classic tunes – talk about an unexpected duet!

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings suggest that there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation is due to random chance. It's statistically significant, it's scientifically intriguing, and it's undeniably groovy!

To provide a visual representation of this unexpected phenomenon, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and Google searches for Snoop Dogg in Orlando. Admire this relationship, but make sure you don't get too lost in the hypnotic sway of the data points – we wouldn't want you to accidentally start freestyling about air pollutants.

These findings not only add a quirky twist to the relationship between environmental factors and online behavior but also offer a delightful reminder that even in the world of academic research, unexpected correlations can, and do, pop up in the most curious places. Just like hidden track on a Snoop Dogg album, sometimes the most fascinating discoveries are tucked away in the seemingly inconspicuous corners of the data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the surprising correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper Snoop Dogg. Despite the seemingly disparate topics, our analysis reveals a striking connection between the two variables over the period from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as air pollution in Orlando increased, so did the interest in Snoop Dogg on the internet. We delve into the potential reasons behind this unexpected relationship, from the impact of air pollution on cognitive function to the possibility of a secret Snoop Dogg fan club within the Environmental Protection Agency. This study sheds light on the quirky, interconnected facets of modern society and serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the perplexing correlation between air pollution in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for Snoop Dogg has incited uproarious curiosity within academic spheres. This unusual linkage, most decidedly not coined at an academic conference on the empirical advantages of hip-hop, has propelled numerous researchers to explore its underlying causes and implications.
In "Pollution Perspectives: Trends in Urban Environments," Smith et al. present a comprehensive analysis of air pollution levels in major American cities, including Orlando. Their findings elucidate the concerning escalation of particulate matter and ozone concentrations in the region. Meanwhile, Doe's "Urban Air Quality and Human Health" delves into the cognitive impairments associated with prolonged exposure to air pollutants, prompting contemplation about the potential impact on individuals' search behaviors.
Venturing further into the juncture of urban environments and cultural phenomena, Jones et al. put forth a thought-provoking proposition in "Hip-Hop and Urban Space." Their work explores the intertwining dynamics of hip-hop culture and the locality in which it thrives. Although originally devoid of empirical analyses concerning air quality, it sets the stage for a whimsical segue into our unexpected inquiry.
Expanding our purview, "The_Doggfather: A Musical Odyssey" by Biographer exemplifies the significance of Snoop Dogg's influence on society, offering an engrossing dissection of his iconic stature in popular culture. Conversely, "Rhythms of Respiratory Responses" by Pulmonologist sheds light on the physiological repercussions of air pollutants, steering us toward the audacious intersection of these ostensibly disparate domains.
As we delve deeper into the annals of unconventional literature, our pursuits led us to some truly outlandish realms. We combed through fictitious works like "Orlando’s Ozone Obsession: A Dogg's Tale," a whimsical satire that paints a fanciful narrative of the city's infatuation with air pollution and Snoop Dogg. Subsequently, we stumbled upon a series of irrelevant sources, including an insightful analysis of existential philosophy in the self-checkout line and a purportedly accidental foray into the universe's enigma as elucidated by grocery store receipts.
Thus, armed with a peculiar amalgamation of fact and facetiousness, we embark on this rib-tickling journey through the interconnectedness of environmental quality and rap legend fandom. As we venture forth into the empirical quagmire of whimsy, may we approach our findings with both gravitas and the occasional chuckle.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends has revealed a surprising and strong correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist Snoop Dogg from 2004 to 2018.
The correlation coefficient between air pollution and Snoop Dogg searches was found to be a whopping 0.8731882. If this correlation were any stronger, we'd be suspecting that the pollutants were surreptitiously ghostwriting rap lyrics! The r-squared value of 0.7624576 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship, indicating that a staggering 76.25% of the variability in Snoop Dogg searches in Orlando can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. It's as if Orlando's pollution is providing the perfect beat for Snoop Dogg's classic tunes – talk about an unexpected duet!
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings suggest that there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation is due to random chance. It's statistically significant, it's scientifically intriguing, and it's undeniably groovy!
To provide a visual representation of this unexpected phenomenon, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and Google searches for Snoop Dogg in Orlando. Admire this relationship, but make sure you don't get too lost in the hypnotic sway of the data points – we wouldn't want you to accidentally start freestyling about air pollutants.
These findings not only add a quirky twist to the relationship between environmental factors and online behavior but also offer a delightful reminder that even in the world of academic research, unexpected correlations can, and do, pop up in the most curious places. Just like hidden track on a Snoop Dogg album, sometimes the most fascinating discoveries are tucked away in the seemingly inconspicuous corners of the data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The findings of this study unmask an intriguing and, dare I say, funky correlation between air pollution in Orlando and Google searches for the legendary Snoop Dogg. It seems the air wasn't the only thing getting polluted in Orlando during our study period. Our results not only confirmed the previous research on urban air quality and its impact on human behavior but also lent statistical support to our contemporaries' eyebrow-raising theories about the confluence of environmental pollutants and hip-hop culture.

Drawing from the whimsical font of literature, we're faced with the comical reality that a city's air pollution levels and its residents' penchant for searching for Snoop Dogg might indeed be entwined. It's as if the air in Orlando was whispering: "Drop it like it's hot" with every gust of pollution. Our statistical analyses unearthed a correlation coefficient that left us in awe, much like discovering a hidden gem in an obscure record store. The strength of this correlation warrants taking a breath – and not just because of the air pollution – as we reflect on the unexpected harmony between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

As our results echoed the findings of Smith et al., who meticulously charted the concerning uptick in air pollutants in Orlando, it became evident that the city's air was, quite literally, the "Doggfather" of all influences on internet search behavior. Furthermore, the work of Jones et al. provided a whimsical runway into our exploration of the juncture between hip-hop culture and environmental quality, underscoring the unlikeliest of convergences in our findings.

Montaging statistical rigor with a dash of humor, our study has illuminated the potential sway of air pollution on online search behaviors, breathing fresh air into the interdisciplinary significance of this unusual relationship. It highlights the need for more comprehensive inquiries into the interplay between environmental variables and cultural phenomena, reminding us that beneath the surface-level absurdity, there may well be meaningful associations awaiting discovery.

In the grand symphony of science, it appears that pollution and Snoop Dogg may have penned a harmonious duet, even if it's not exactly a hip-hopera. This quirky quirk in the data serves as a twirling, tie-dye reminder that science can sometimes be as funky as a '90s rap beat.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the surprising correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper Snoop Dogg. Despite the seemingly disparate topics, our analysis reveals a striking connection between the two variables over the period from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as air pollution in Orlando increased, so did the interest in Snoop Dogg on the internet. We delve into the potential reasons behind this unexpected relationship, from the impact of air pollution on cognitive function to the possibility of a secret Snoop Dogg fan club within the Environmental Protection Agency. This study sheds light on the quirky, interconnected facets of modern society and serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Beethoven had his Fifth Symphony, Sherlock Holmes had his pipe and, apparently, Orlando has its air pollution and Snoop Dogg. In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of air quality and hip-hop culture to uncover the perplexing correlation between air pollution levels in the City Beautiful and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rapper Snoop Dogg.
It all started with a hunch - or perhaps a whiff of something in the air - that there might be something more than meets the eye, or the nose, in the Orlando atmosphere. Now, we know what you might be thinking, "What on earth could air pollution possibly have to do with Snoop Dogg? Are the fumes making people hallucinate that they're partying with the Doggfather himself?" Well, fear not, dear reader, for this academic escapade aims to explore this bizarre association with the rigors of scientific inquiry and a sprinkle of humor.
Before delving into the statistical intricacies and brain-teasing analyses, it's only fair to acknowledge the initial disbelief and snarky skepticism that greeted our research proposal. "Has science finally lost its marbles," they'd mock. "Is this some sneaky ploy to sneak hip-hop references into the annals of academic literature?" they'd chuckle. But we stood firm, unfazed by the raised eyebrows and knowing smirks, determined to unlock the secrets hidden amid the ambient pollutants of Orlando.
As we pore over the data, a remarkable pattern emerges - a correlation coefficient that exceeds even our wildest expectations. What could this mean? Is there a logical explanation, or did we simply inhale too many statistical fumes? Join us in this scientific rollercoaster, where we examine the effects of air pollution on cognitive functions, speculate about the Snoop Dogg fan club surreptitiously lurking in government agencies, and even ponder the possibility of Snoop Dogg himself being a secret Orlando air quality enthusiast.
So, fasten your seatbelts and buckle up for a journey through the uncharted territory of quirky connections and the peculiar mysteries that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disjointed variables. After all, as the great Snoop Dogg once said, "It ain't no fun if the homies can't have none," and here in the world of academia, we're all about sharing the fun and the unexpected discoveries.


[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends has revealed a surprising and strong correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist Snoop Dogg from 2004 to 2018.
The correlation coefficient between air pollution and Snoop Dogg searches was found to be a whopping 0.8731882. If this correlation were any stronger, we'd be suspecting that the pollutants were surreptitiously ghostwriting rap lyrics! The r-squared value of 0.7624576 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship, indicating that a staggering 76.25% of the variability in Snoop Dogg searches in Orlando can be explained by changes in air pollution levels. It's as if Orlando's pollution is providing the perfect beat for Snoop Dogg's classic tunes – talk about an unexpected duet!
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings suggest that there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation is due to random chance. It's statistically significant, it's scientifically intriguing, and it's undeniably groovy!
To provide a visual representation of this unexpected phenomenon, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and Google searches for Snoop Dogg in Orlando. Admire this relationship, but make sure you don't get too lost in the hypnotic sway of the data points – we wouldn't want you to accidentally start freestyling about air pollutants.
These findings not only add a quirky twist to the relationship between environmental factors and online behavior but also offer a delightful reminder that even in the world of academic research, unexpected correlations can, and do, pop up in the most curious places. Just like hidden track on a Snoop Dogg album, sometimes the most fascinating discoveries are tucked away in the seemingly inconspicuous corners of the data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has provided compelling evidence of the eyebrow-raising connection between air pollution in Orlando and the surge in Google searches for the one and only Snoop Dogg. Who would have thought that the atmosphere in Orlando could be the secret sauce for a spike in Snoop-related online activity?

Our remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882 has left us wondering if Snoop's next album might include a track titled "Air Quality Anthem." With an r-squared value of 0.7624576, it's as if the pollutants are dropping beats that resonate with the masses. Perhaps the Environmental Protection Agency should consider installing air filters that emit Snoop Dogg's greatest hits – it could be a stellar public health initiative and a musical experience all rolled into one!

The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests that there's more to this correlation than just statistical noise. It's like finding a rare collectible hidden in a pile of mundane data – unexpected, yet undeniably thrilling.

The implications of this quirky relationship go beyond the realms of science and statistics, offering a refreshing reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated variables can dance to the same tune. Who knew that the invisible dance of air pollutants and the rhythm of hip-hop culture could intertwine in such a harmonious, or should we say "Snoop-harmonious," manner?

In the immortal words of Snoop Dogg, "I am what I am, and that's all that I am." Just like the enigmatic allure of the Doggfather himself, this correlation stands as a testament to the infinite intrigue of the mysterious relationship between seemingly disconnected elements.

In the spirit of scientific exploration and a touch of whimsy, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It's time to let the Orlando skies clear and allow Snoop Dogg's fans to thoroughly enjoy his music, free from statistical scrutinies. After all, as Snoop would say, "Drop it like it's hot," and in the world of research, we couldn't agree more.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Urban Air Quality Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Air Quality and Cultural Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Smoke Signals: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Orlando and Google Searches for 'Snoop Dogg' with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the surprising correlation between air pollution levels in Orlando and the frequency of Google searches for the legendary rapper Snoop Dogg. Despite the seemingly disparate topics, our analysis reveals a striking connection between the two variables over the period from 2004 to 2018. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, we uncovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8731882, with a p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest that as air pollution in Orlando increased, so did the interest in Snoop Dogg on the internet. We delve into the potential reasons behind this unexpected relationship, from the impact of air pollution on cognitive function to the possibility of a secret Snoop Dogg fan club within the Environmental Protection Agency. This study sheds light on the quirky, interconnected facets of modern society and serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely pairings can yield fascinating insights.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Orlando, Google searches, Snoop Dogg, correlation, environmental protection agency, Google Trends, cognitive function, societal implications, interdisciplinary research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Orlando
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Orlando

Google searches for 'snoop dog'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'snoop dog' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'snoop dog'

Correlation r = 0.8731882 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7624576 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'snoop dog') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Orlando) over the 15 years from 2004 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.1E-5. 0.0000213396477391507040000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.0021% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 46,861 random variables You don't actually need 46 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Air pollution in Orlando (Bad air quality days)0.5464481.369860.5479450.54794500000000000.273973
Google searches for 'snoop dog' (Rel. search volume)50.833367.916740.583338.532.916724.333321.2524.666717.7513.583317.517.916715.2511.259.41667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.546448,1.36986,0.547945,0.547945,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([50.8333,67.9167,40.5833,38.5,32.9167,24.3333,21.25,24.6667,17.75,13.5833,17.5,17.9167,15.25,11.25,9.41667,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Orlando"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'snoop dog'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2185 · Black Variable ID: 21009 · Red Variable ID: 1526
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0