about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,161 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the second variable is Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

With fewer detectives and criminal investigators available to solve cases, the squirrels in Alaska realized they could no longer get away with their bushy-tailed banditry. Faced with the possibility of being brought to justice, the squirrels decided to switch from a life of crime to a life of nut-gathering, leading to a decrease in attacks on unsuspecting individuals.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a realistic small office in Alaska. Inside the office, two detectives are engaged in conversation, with one of them seated at a desk while glancing at the computer screen. The computer screen displays a Google search for "attacked by a squirrel," highlighting a recent surge in related searches. The room should have a cozy, rustic feel, with elements that capture the essence of Alaska, such as a map of the state on the wall or a vintage sled leaning against a cabinet. The detectives should be wearing typical Alaska attire, such as flannel shirts and sturdy boots, adding to the authenticity of the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo Glitch art Cutsy graphics An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small office in Alaska, two detectives are discussing a case while one of them glances at their computer screen. The screen shows a Google search for "attacked by a squirrel", indicating a recent spike in such searches.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a small office in Alaska, two detectives are discussing a case while one of them glances at their computer screen. The screen shows a Google search for "attacked by a squirrel", indicating a recent spike in such searches. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a realistic small office in Alaska. Inside the office, two detectives are engaged in conversation, with one of them seated at a desk while glancing at the computer screen. The computer screen displays a Google search for "attacked by a squirrel," highlighting a recent surge in related searches. The room should have a cozy, rustic feel, with elements that capture the essence of Alaska, such as a map of the state on the wall or a vintage sled leaning against a cabinet. The detectives should be wearing typical Alaska attire, such as flannel shirts and sturdy boots, adding to the authenticity of the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska caused attacked by a squirrel (Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel') to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

The Journal of Rodent Investigations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9226868 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to Alaska, the land of majestic moose, breath-taking glaciers, and...savage squirrels? Our research delves into the bizarre connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. By analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the years 2004 to 2022. This correlation suggests a peculiar association between the crime-solving prowess of Alaska's detective workforce and public fears of squirrel attacks. Our findings not only raise eyebrows, but also question the endless mysteries of statistical coincidences in the Last Frontier.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to Alaska, the land of majestic moose, breath-taking glaciers, and...savage squirrels? Our research delves into the bizarre connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. By analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the years 2004 to 2022. This correlation suggests a peculiar association between the crime-solving prowess of Alaska's detective workforce and public fears of squirrel attacks. Our findings not only raise eyebrows, but also question the endless mysteries of statistical coincidences in the Last Frontier.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of law enforcement, Alaska may be better known for its rugged landscapes and adventurous wildlife encounters. However, our research sheds light on a less conventional investigation – the curious link between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. At first glance, one might wonder what squirrels and sleuths could possibly have in common. Yet, as we embarked on this unconventional journey through statistics and search trends, we discovered a correlation that could make even the most seasoned investigator do a double take.

Alaska, with its vast expanses and diverse ecosystems, provides an unparalleled backdrop for this peculiar inquiry. While the state may be synonymous with outdoor escapades and scenic beauty, it seems that the squirrels lurking in its midst have sparked an unusual interest among its residents. Could it be that the very individuals entrusted with uncovering the truth behind criminal activities also hold a key to unraveling the mysteries of squirrel-related concerns?

In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the professional pursuits of Alaska's gumshoes and the seemingly whimsical but undeniably prevalent inquiries about squirrel attacks. Embracing the unexpected and diving into the data, we will unravel the statistical intrigue that surrounds this unlikely duo of investigative endeavors. So, prepare to don your detective hat, dear reader, as we navigate through the perplexing landscape of Alaska's squirrel sleuths and the truths they reveal.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to Alaska, the land of majestic moose, breath-taking glaciers, and...savage squirrels? Our research delves into the bizarre connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. By analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the years 2004 to 2022. This correlation suggests a peculiar association between the crime-solving prowess of Alaska's detective workforce and public fears of squirrel attacks. Our findings not only raise eyebrows, but also question the endless mysteries of statistical coincidences in the Last Frontier.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of law enforcement, Alaska may be better known for its rugged landscapes and adventurous wildlife encounters. However, our research sheds light on a less conventional investigation – the curious link between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. At first glance, one might wonder what squirrels and sleuths could possibly have in common. Yet, as we embarked on this unconventional journey through statistics and search trends, we discovered a correlation that could make even the most seasoned investigator do a double take.
Alaska, with its vast expanses and diverse ecosystems, provides an unparalleled backdrop for this peculiar inquiry. While the state may be synonymous with outdoor escapades and scenic beauty, it seems that the squirrels lurking in its midst have sparked an unusual interest among its residents. Could it be that the very individuals entrusted with uncovering the truth behind criminal activities also hold a key to unraveling the mysteries of squirrel-related concerns?
In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the professional pursuits of Alaska's gumshoes and the seemingly whimsical but undeniably prevalent inquiries about squirrel attacks. Embracing the unexpected and diving into the data, we will unravel the statistical intrigue that surrounds this unlikely duo of investigative endeavors. So, prepare to don your detective hat, dear reader, as we navigate through the perplexing landscape of Alaska's squirrel sleuths and the truths they reveal.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The existing literature on the correlation between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in specific regions and unconventional societal phenomena offers a mix of serious analyses and intriguing conjectures. Smith (2015) explores the influence of law enforcement presence on public perception and behavior, delving into the potential ripple effects of detective work on societal anxieties and concerns. Furthermore, Doe and Jones (2018) examine the intersection of law enforcement demographics and public interest in unusual wildlife encounters, shedding light on the wider implications of detective density on community interests. These studies set the stage for our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Alaska's sleuths and the Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.
As we venture into the world of statistical anomalies and bizarre patterns, it is important to note the influence of notable non-fiction works on wildlife behavior, such as "Squirrel Society: An Exploration of Our Furry Neighbors" and "Wild Encounters: Tales of Human-Wildlife Interactions in the Last Frontier". These literary contributions, focusing on the complex interactions between humans and wildlife, offer a backdrop for our investigation into the unexpected bond between Alaska's detective force and squirrel-related inquiries.
Moving into the realm of fiction, the works of acclaimed authors such as "The Curious Case of the Squirrel Detective" and "Whiskers and Whodunits: A Furry Mystery Series" add an element of whimsy to our exploration. While these literary creations entertain the fantastical notion of squirrel investigators, they prompt a lighthearted reflection on the juxtaposition of investigative prowess and wildlife intrigue in Alaska's societal landscape.
In addition to these conventional sources, it would be remiss to overlook the unconventional avenues of exploration. Drawing inspiration from offbeat sources such as the backs of shampoo bottles (2017) – which inadvertently sparked musings on wildlife encounters during the morning routine – our interdisciplinary approach seeks to embrace unexpected insights into the enigmatic correlation between Alaska's gumshoes and 'attacked by a squirrel' Google searches.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to Alaska, the land of majestic moose, breath-taking glaciers, and...savage squirrels? Our research delves into the bizarre connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. By analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the years 2004 to 2022. This correlation suggests a peculiar association between the crime-solving prowess of Alaska's detective workforce and public fears of squirrel attacks. Our findings not only raise eyebrows, but also question the endless mysteries of statistical coincidences in the Last Frontier.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of law enforcement, Alaska may be better known for its rugged landscapes and adventurous wildlife encounters. However, our research sheds light on a less conventional investigation – the curious link between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. At first glance, one might wonder what squirrels and sleuths could possibly have in common. Yet, as we embarked on this unconventional journey through statistics and search trends, we discovered a correlation that could make even the most seasoned investigator do a double take.
Alaska, with its vast expanses and diverse ecosystems, provides an unparalleled backdrop for this peculiar inquiry. While the state may be synonymous with outdoor escapades and scenic beauty, it seems that the squirrels lurking in its midst have sparked an unusual interest among its residents. Could it be that the very individuals entrusted with uncovering the truth behind criminal activities also hold a key to unraveling the mysteries of squirrel-related concerns?
In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the professional pursuits of Alaska's gumshoes and the seemingly whimsical but undeniably prevalent inquiries about squirrel attacks. Embracing the unexpected and diving into the data, we will unravel the statistical intrigue that surrounds this unlikely duo of investigative endeavors. So, prepare to don your detective hat, dear reader, as we navigate through the perplexing landscape of Alaska's squirrel sleuths and the truths they reveal.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the elusive connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel', our research team executed a cunning plan to gather and scrutinize data. We dug deep into the digital archives of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, carefully selecting the years 2004 to 2022 as the time frame for our investigation.

First, we raided the Bureau of Labor Statistics, pilfering the employment data for detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska. With our magnifying glasses in hand, we meticulously examined the annual employment figures, ensuring that no detective, private eye, or super-sleuth was left unaccounted for in our pursuit of statistical truth.

Next, we turned to the virtual forest of Google Trends, tracking the frequency of searches containing the phrase 'attacked by a squirrel' originating from the untamed lands of Alaska. Much like squirrels hoarding nuts for the winter, we gathered, hoarded, and analyzed an exorbitant amount of search data, ready to crack open the nuts of correlation and causation.

Once we had our deceptively simple but statistically robust datasets in our clutches, we invoked the formidable powers of correlation analysis. Employing sophisticated statistical methods, including Pearson’s correlation coefficient and p-values, we sought to uncover the hidden threads connecting Alaska's investigative force to society's Google queries about squirrel assaults.

Our analytical endeavors didn't stop there. With the tenacity of a bloodhound on the scent of a suspect, we employed time series analysis to identify any temporal patterns in the relationship between the number of detectives and criminal investigators and the ebb and flow of 'attacked by a squirrel' searches.

Further bolstering our investigation, we delved into the world of regression analysis, seeking to untangle the intricate web of factors that may be influencing the frequency of squirrel attack searches, including but not limited to weather patterns, wildlife migration behavior, and perhaps, the occasional plot twist from a furry perpetrator.

In order to ensure the veracity of our findings, we also conducted sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of our results under varying conditions and parameters, safeguarding our research from potential statistical red herrings and wild goose chases.

With our methodologies carefully crafted and executed, our team embarked on a statistical adventure that promised to shed light on the enigmatic intersection of crime-solving prowess and squirrel-related concerns within the Last Frontier.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9226868, r-squared of 0.8513510, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to Alaska, the land of majestic moose, breath-taking glaciers, and...savage squirrels? Our research delves into the bizarre connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. By analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the years 2004 to 2022. This correlation suggests a peculiar association between the crime-solving prowess of Alaska's detective workforce and public fears of squirrel attacks. Our findings not only raise eyebrows, but also question the endless mysteries of statistical coincidences in the Last Frontier.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of law enforcement, Alaska may be better known for its rugged landscapes and adventurous wildlife encounters. However, our research sheds light on a less conventional investigation – the curious link between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. At first glance, one might wonder what squirrels and sleuths could possibly have in common. Yet, as we embarked on this unconventional journey through statistics and search trends, we discovered a correlation that could make even the most seasoned investigator do a double take.
Alaska, with its vast expanses and diverse ecosystems, provides an unparalleled backdrop for this peculiar inquiry. While the state may be synonymous with outdoor escapades and scenic beauty, it seems that the squirrels lurking in its midst have sparked an unusual interest among its residents. Could it be that the very individuals entrusted with uncovering the truth behind criminal activities also hold a key to unraveling the mysteries of squirrel-related concerns?
In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the professional pursuits of Alaska's gumshoes and the seemingly whimsical but undeniably prevalent inquiries about squirrel attacks. Embracing the unexpected and diving into the data, we will unravel the statistical intrigue that surrounds this unlikely duo of investigative endeavors. So, prepare to don your detective hat, dear reader, as we navigate through the perplexing landscape of Alaska's squirrel sleuths and the truths they reveal.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong and positive correlation between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9226868 and the r-squared value of 0.8513510 indicated a robust relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the statistical significance of this connection.

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling association between the two variables, with an unmistakable upward trend that would make even the most intrepid gumshoe do a double take. The data points form a positively sloped cloud, indicating that as the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska increased, so did the frequency of Google searches for squirrel attacks. The trend is so pronounced that it seems even the squirrels themselves would be impressed by the detective work involved in uncovering this correlation.

This unexpected bond between crime-solvers and squirrel concerns leads us to ponder the deep mysteries of statistical anomalies in the Last Frontier. It seems the furry suspects of Alaska have managed to capture the public's attention, prompting individuals to seek solace in the virtual realm through Google searches. Meanwhile, Alaska's dedicated investigators have been diligently pursuing truth and justice, all while inadvertently contributing to the unraveling of this quirky statistical relationship.

The findings of our study not only highlight the whimsical and unexpected nature of statistical associations but also underscore the need to remain open to unconventional inquiries in the pursuit of truth. These results not only raise questions but also provide a whole new perspective on the synergy between the work of Alaska's gumshoes and the peculiar allure of squirrel-related mysteries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to Alaska, the land of majestic moose, breath-taking glaciers, and...savage squirrels? Our research delves into the bizarre connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. By analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the years 2004 to 2022. This correlation suggests a peculiar association between the crime-solving prowess of Alaska's detective workforce and public fears of squirrel attacks. Our findings not only raise eyebrows, but also question the endless mysteries of statistical coincidences in the Last Frontier.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature on the correlation between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in specific regions and unconventional societal phenomena offers a mix of serious analyses and intriguing conjectures. Smith (2015) explores the influence of law enforcement presence on public perception and behavior, delving into the potential ripple effects of detective work on societal anxieties and concerns. Furthermore, Doe and Jones (2018) examine the intersection of law enforcement demographics and public interest in unusual wildlife encounters, shedding light on the wider implications of detective density on community interests. These studies set the stage for our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Alaska's sleuths and the Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.
As we venture into the world of statistical anomalies and bizarre patterns, it is important to note the influence of notable non-fiction works on wildlife behavior, such as "Squirrel Society: An Exploration of Our Furry Neighbors" and "Wild Encounters: Tales of Human-Wildlife Interactions in the Last Frontier". These literary contributions, focusing on the complex interactions between humans and wildlife, offer a backdrop for our investigation into the unexpected bond between Alaska's detective force and squirrel-related inquiries.
Moving into the realm of fiction, the works of acclaimed authors such as "The Curious Case of the Squirrel Detective" and "Whiskers and Whodunits: A Furry Mystery Series" add an element of whimsy to our exploration. While these literary creations entertain the fantastical notion of squirrel investigators, they prompt a lighthearted reflection on the juxtaposition of investigative prowess and wildlife intrigue in Alaska's societal landscape.
In addition to these conventional sources, it would be remiss to overlook the unconventional avenues of exploration. Drawing inspiration from offbeat sources such as the backs of shampoo bottles (2017) – which inadvertently sparked musings on wildlife encounters during the morning routine – our interdisciplinary approach seeks to embrace unexpected insights into the enigmatic correlation between Alaska's gumshoes and 'attacked by a squirrel' Google searches.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong and positive correlation between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9226868 and the r-squared value of 0.8513510 indicated a robust relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the statistical significance of this connection.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling association between the two variables, with an unmistakable upward trend that would make even the most intrepid gumshoe do a double take. The data points form a positively sloped cloud, indicating that as the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska increased, so did the frequency of Google searches for squirrel attacks. The trend is so pronounced that it seems even the squirrels themselves would be impressed by the detective work involved in uncovering this correlation.
This unexpected bond between crime-solvers and squirrel concerns leads us to ponder the deep mysteries of statistical anomalies in the Last Frontier. It seems the furry suspects of Alaska have managed to capture the public's attention, prompting individuals to seek solace in the virtual realm through Google searches. Meanwhile, Alaska's dedicated investigators have been diligently pursuing truth and justice, all while inadvertently contributing to the unraveling of this quirky statistical relationship.
The findings of our study not only highlight the whimsical and unexpected nature of statistical associations but also underscore the need to remain open to unconventional inquiries in the pursuit of truth. These results not only raise questions but also provide a whole new perspective on the synergy between the work of Alaska's gumshoes and the peculiar allure of squirrel-related mysteries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our investigation into the correlation between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' not only astound the mind, but also rouse the sense of wonder about the whimsical nature of statistical associations. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, complemented by a compelling scatterplot, provides compelling evidence of a strong positive relationship. It seems that the more detectives and criminal investigators there are in Alaska, the more the public's interest in squirrel-related concerns escalates.

Our results align with prior research by Smith (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who explored the influence of law enforcement on public perception and behavior, as well as the intersection of law enforcement demographics and public interest in unusual wildlife encounters. The unexpected bond between Alaska's gumshoes and public fears of squirrel attacks echoes the ripple effects of detective work on societal anxieties and concerns documented by Smith. Furthermore, our findings resonate with the wider implications of detective density on community interests, as illuminated by the work of Doe and Jones. It appears that the peculiar association we uncovered holds true to the intriguing conjectures and serious analyses present in the existing literature.

Drawing from the backdrop of non-fiction works on wildlife behavior and human-wildlife interactions, our investigation has unveiled a connection that, while surprising, echoes the complexity of wildlife encounters documented in these literary contributions. Intertwined with the lighthearted and whimsical elements of fictional squirrel detectives, our statistical analysis has managed to add a layer of intrigue to the often serious realm of law enforcement and public interest.

The unexpected connection between Alaska's detective force and squirrel-related inquiries prompts a reevaluation of conventional wisdom. Just as the backs of shampoo bottles (2017) inadvertently sparked musings on wildlife encounters during morning routines, our own unexpected insights have proven the value of interdisciplinary approaches and the embrace of quirky statistical anomalies as valid avenues of exploration.

Our findings not only contribute to the enigmatic correlation between Alaska's gumshoes and 'attacked by a squirrel' Google searches but also elevate the synergy between detective work and the peculiar allure of squirrel-related mysteries into the realm of academic curiosity. The statistical association we have revealed not only raises eyebrows but also tantalizingly suggests the delightful capers that statistical analysis can uncover. It seems that in Alaska, the boundless mysteries of wildlife and detective work converge to form a statistical anomaly that would make even the most intrepid gumshoe do a double take.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to Alaska, the land of majestic moose, breath-taking glaciers, and...savage squirrels? Our research delves into the bizarre connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. By analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the years 2004 to 2022. This correlation suggests a peculiar association between the crime-solving prowess of Alaska's detective workforce and public fears of squirrel attacks. Our findings not only raise eyebrows, but also question the endless mysteries of statistical coincidences in the Last Frontier.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of law enforcement, Alaska may be better known for its rugged landscapes and adventurous wildlife encounters. However, our research sheds light on a less conventional investigation – the curious link between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. At first glance, one might wonder what squirrels and sleuths could possibly have in common. Yet, as we embarked on this unconventional journey through statistics and search trends, we discovered a correlation that could make even the most seasoned investigator do a double take.
Alaska, with its vast expanses and diverse ecosystems, provides an unparalleled backdrop for this peculiar inquiry. While the state may be synonymous with outdoor escapades and scenic beauty, it seems that the squirrels lurking in its midst have sparked an unusual interest among its residents. Could it be that the very individuals entrusted with uncovering the truth behind criminal activities also hold a key to unraveling the mysteries of squirrel-related concerns?
In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the professional pursuits of Alaska's gumshoes and the seemingly whimsical but undeniably prevalent inquiries about squirrel attacks. Embracing the unexpected and diving into the data, we will unravel the statistical intrigue that surrounds this unlikely duo of investigative endeavors. So, prepare to don your detective hat, dear reader, as we navigate through the perplexing landscape of Alaska's squirrel sleuths and the truths they reveal.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a remarkably strong and positive correlation between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9226868 and the r-squared value of 0.8513510 indicated a robust relationship, while the p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the statistical significance of this connection.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling association between the two variables, with an unmistakable upward trend that would make even the most intrepid gumshoe do a double take. The data points form a positively sloped cloud, indicating that as the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska increased, so did the frequency of Google searches for squirrel attacks. The trend is so pronounced that it seems even the squirrels themselves would be impressed by the detective work involved in uncovering this correlation.
This unexpected bond between crime-solvers and squirrel concerns leads us to ponder the deep mysteries of statistical anomalies in the Last Frontier. It seems the furry suspects of Alaska have managed to capture the public's attention, prompting individuals to seek solace in the virtual realm through Google searches. Meanwhile, Alaska's dedicated investigators have been diligently pursuing truth and justice, all while inadvertently contributing to the unraveling of this quirky statistical relationship.
The findings of our study not only highlight the whimsical and unexpected nature of statistical associations but also underscore the need to remain open to unconventional inquiries in the pursuit of truth. These results not only raise questions but also provide a whole new perspective on the synergy between the work of Alaska's gumshoes and the peculiar allure of squirrel-related mysteries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the unlikely correlation between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. The robust correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value emphasize the peculiar link between crime-solving prowess and squirrel-related concerns. It seems that the detective work in Alaska has extended beyond the usual suspects to include the bushy-tailed culprits of the Last Frontier.

The statistical connection between the two variables not only raises eyebrows but also prompts us to ponder the whimsical and unpredictable nature of human behavior. As the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska increased, so did the public's interest in squirrel attacks, creating a statistical saga that would make Agatha Christie herself envious. It appears that Alaska's gumshoes unwittingly became the sleuths of squirrel-related statistics, unveiling a mystery that even the most resourceful detective wouldn't have anticipated.

While this correlation might seem nutty at first glance, our findings underscore the importance of embracing unconventional inquiries in the pursuit of truth. The enigmatic bond between Alaska's crime-solvers and the curious allure of squirrel-related searches challenges us to keep an open mind and remain vigilant for unexpected statistical surprises. It seems that even in the Last Frontier, where the wilderness reigns supreme, statistical oddities continue to captivate and confound.

In light of these compelling findings, we assert with conviction that further research in this domain would be akin to chasing a red herring. The statistical significance and undeniable charm of this correlation leave little room for doubt or further exploration. It's safe to say that we've cracked this case wide open, and no more investigative work is needed in this nutty territory. With that said, dear reader, it's time to close this peculiar chapter in Alaska's statistical annals and turn our attention to new, equally captivating mysteries in the realm of data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Rodent Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Rodent Investigation and Tails (SARIT)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Squirrel Sleuths and Truths: The Relationship Between Alaska's Gumshoes and 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches with an abstract of When it comes to Alaska, the land of majestic moose, breath-taking glaciers, and...savage squirrels? Our research delves into the bizarre connection between the number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska and the frequency of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. By analyzing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9226868, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the years 2004 to 2022. This correlation suggests a peculiar association between the crime-solving prowess of Alaska's detective workforce and public fears of squirrel attacks. Our findings not only raise eyebrows, but also question the endless mysteries of statistical coincidences in the Last Frontier.

ChatGPT:

Alaska, Gumshoes, detectives, criminal investigators, Google searches, 'attacked by a squirrel', correlation coefficient, p-value, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, statistical coincidences, Last Frontier

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska

Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'

Correlation r = 0.9226868 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8513510 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-8. 0.0000000188253764493188760000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.9E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 53,119,788 random variables You don't actually need 53 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska (Laborers)1601701701201101101101201101001109010010090100100100110
Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' (Rel. search volume)12.251211.752.4166703.333334.752.54.333333.9166720.9166672.583330.750.4166671.166671.416673.583334.16667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([160,170,170,120,110,110,110,120,110,100,110,90,100,100,90,100,100,100,110,])
array_2 = np.array([12.25,12,11.75,2.41667,0,3.33333,4.75,2.5,4.33333,3.91667,2,0.916667,2.58333,0.75,0.416667,1.16667,1.41667,3.58333,4.16667,])
array_1_name = "The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Alaska"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 2161 · Black Variable ID: 4762 · Red Variable ID: 1354
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0