about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,074 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in History and the second variable is Electricity generation in Vietnam.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people became familiar with the past, they were shocked to learn that Vietnam War-era electrical infrastructure was outdated. This led to a surge in support for modernization efforts, sparking a historical connection to Vietnam's power surge today. After all, it's truly electrifying to witness the sparks of knowledge igniting progress!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a steampunk scene in Vietnam that includes a group of students in graduation gowns and caps receiving their Associate's degrees in History at a university building. In the background, a large, weathered wind turbine spins its rusted blades to generate electricity for the surrounding area. The setting should have a steampunk aesthetic, characterized by a mix of antique, industrial, and futuristic elements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Oragami Data cyber art a Polaroid photo Parallax art
ChatGPT: Electricity generation in Vietnam: Steampunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of students in graduation gowns and caps are receiving their Associate's degrees in History in front of a university building in Vietnam, while in the background, a wind turbine is spinning to generate electricity for the surrounding area.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Electricity generation in Vietnam: Steampunk ] and depicting this scene: A group of students in graduation gowns and caps are receiving their Associate's degrees in History in front of a university building in Vietnam, while in the background, a wind turbine is spinning to generate electricity for the surrounding area. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a steampunk scene in Vietnam that includes a group of students in graduation gowns and caps receiving their Associate's degrees in History at a university building. In the background, a large, weathered wind turbine spins its rusted blades to generate electricity for the surrounding area. The setting should have a steampunk aesthetic, characterized by a mix of antique, industrial, and futuristic elements.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in History caused Electricity generation in Vietnam to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam

The Journal of Energy Education & Historical Insights

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam. Through an analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

The findings of this study suggest that there could be an electrifying connection between the academic pursuits of History and the production of electricity in Vietnam. While the link may seem unexpected, it electrifies the imagination and sparks curiosity about the broader implications of interdisciplinary research. This paper demonstrates how exploring unconventional connections can illuminate new insights and generate a buzz in both academic and industry circles.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam. Through an analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

The findings of this study suggest that there could be an electrifying connection between the academic pursuits of History and the production of electricity in Vietnam. While the link may seem unexpected, it electrifies the imagination and sparks curiosity about the broader implications of interdisciplinary research. This paper demonstrates how exploring unconventional connections can illuminate new insights and generate a buzz in both academic and industry circles.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the electrifying world of academic research, there are few things more shocking than discovering unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our current study delves into the enthralling realm of history degrees and electricity generation in Vietnam, a correlation that sends sparks flying through the conventional wisdom of education and energy production.

History is often regarded as a field that illuminates the past, but our findings suggest that it may also hold a charge for the future of energy. Meanwhile, the generation of electricity has long been associated with the movement of electrons, yet our data hints at a current of historical influence running through the production process.

This paper seeks to shed light on this surprising relationship and unravel its underlying mechanisms. By conducting a rigorous analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to shock the academic community with our findings and electrify interest in interdisciplinary research.

As we venture into this electrifying investigation, it is worth noting that the academic landscape often experiences power surges of curiosity when connections like these are brought to light. Whether this correlation is merely a statistical anomaly or a current for further exploration remains to be seen, but the potential implications are sure to spark debates and generate a buzz in both scholarly and practical circles.

Therefore, as we flip the switch on this discussion, let us embark on a journey of discovery, poised with our volts of knowledge and watts of enthusiasm. After all, when history and electricity come together, the result is truly shocking!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam. Through an analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

The findings of this study suggest that there could be an electrifying connection between the academic pursuits of History and the production of electricity in Vietnam. While the link may seem unexpected, it electrifies the imagination and sparks curiosity about the broader implications of interdisciplinary research. This paper demonstrates how exploring unconventional connections can illuminate new insights and generate a buzz in both academic and industry circles.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the electrifying world of academic research, there are few things more shocking than discovering unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our current study delves into the enthralling realm of history degrees and electricity generation in Vietnam, a correlation that sends sparks flying through the conventional wisdom of education and energy production.
History is often regarded as a field that illuminates the past, but our findings suggest that it may also hold a charge for the future of energy. Meanwhile, the generation of electricity has long been associated with the movement of electrons, yet our data hints at a current of historical influence running through the production process.
This paper seeks to shed light on this surprising relationship and unravel its underlying mechanisms. By conducting a rigorous analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to shock the academic community with our findings and electrify interest in interdisciplinary research.
As we venture into this electrifying investigation, it is worth noting that the academic landscape often experiences power surges of curiosity when connections like these are brought to light. Whether this correlation is merely a statistical anomaly or a current for further exploration remains to be seen, but the potential implications are sure to spark debates and generate a buzz in both scholarly and practical circles.
Therefore, as we flip the switch on this discussion, let us embark on a journey of discovery, poised with our volts of knowledge and watts of enthusiasm. After all, when history and electricity come together, the result is truly shocking!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between educational pursuits and industrial outcomes has long been a subject of interest in academic circles. Research by Smith (2015) highlights the impact of specialized training on workforce productivity, while Doe (2017) delves into the role of historical knowledge in shaping societal development. Furthermore, Jones (2019) provides insight into the connections between energy production and educational pathways, albeit in a broader context.

Turning to the specific context of Vietnam, historical accounts hold significant value in understanding the nation's complex past and its trajectory towards modernization. Books such as "The Vietnam War: An Intimate History" by Geoffrey C. Ward and Ken Burns, and "Vietnam: A History" by Stanley Karnow have enriched the understanding of Vietnam's historical journey. Meanwhile, literature exploring the technical aspects of electricity generation, such as "Electricity and Electronics for HVAC" by Rex Miller and Mark Miller, sheds light on the intricate mechanics at play.

As we navigate through this eclectic landscape of research and literature, it's essential to acknowledge the diverse influences that shape our understanding of these interconnected realms. In the age of internet culture, memes like "Shocked Pikachu" and "History Channel vs. Reality" serve as humorous reflections of the unexpected juxtapositions that arise in our collective consciousness. While these memes may seem lighthearted, they do pose interesting questions about the intersection of historical knowledge and technological advancements.

As we continue our pursuit of uncovering the link between Associate degrees in History and electricity generation in Vietnam, it is important to approach the subject with a sense of curiosity and open-mindedness. After all, the sparks of innovation often emerge from the unlikeliest of connections, and it is in these unconventional junctions that we uncover the true potential for transformative discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam. Through an analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

The findings of this study suggest that there could be an electrifying connection between the academic pursuits of History and the production of electricity in Vietnam. While the link may seem unexpected, it electrifies the imagination and sparks curiosity about the broader implications of interdisciplinary research. This paper demonstrates how exploring unconventional connections can illuminate new insights and generate a buzz in both academic and industry circles.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the electrifying world of academic research, there are few things more shocking than discovering unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our current study delves into the enthralling realm of history degrees and electricity generation in Vietnam, a correlation that sends sparks flying through the conventional wisdom of education and energy production.
History is often regarded as a field that illuminates the past, but our findings suggest that it may also hold a charge for the future of energy. Meanwhile, the generation of electricity has long been associated with the movement of electrons, yet our data hints at a current of historical influence running through the production process.
This paper seeks to shed light on this surprising relationship and unravel its underlying mechanisms. By conducting a rigorous analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to shock the academic community with our findings and electrify interest in interdisciplinary research.
As we venture into this electrifying investigation, it is worth noting that the academic landscape often experiences power surges of curiosity when connections like these are brought to light. Whether this correlation is merely a statistical anomaly or a current for further exploration remains to be seen, but the potential implications are sure to spark debates and generate a buzz in both scholarly and practical circles.
Therefore, as we flip the switch on this discussion, let us embark on a journey of discovery, poised with our volts of knowledge and watts of enthusiasm. After all, when history and electricity come together, the result is truly shocking!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the electrifying connection between Associate degrees in History and electricity generation in Vietnam, our research team embarked on a journey that was both illuminating and, dare I say, electrifying. The methodology employed in this study combined statistical analyses with a dash of historical inquiry, creating a concoction that might be deemed as intellectually electrifying.

Data Collection:

Our data collection process involved harnessing the power of the internet to procure information from various sources. We primarily relied on the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration as our main sources of data. This approach ensured that our dataset was both robust and shockingly informative, encompassing the time span from 2011 to 2021.

Statistical Analysis:

We utilized a mix of quantitative analyses to rigorously examine the relationship between History degrees and electricity generation. The primary statistical tool employed was the correlation coefficient, which allowed us to quantify the strength and direction of the association between the two variables. By flexing our numerical muscles, we computed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 - a figure that sent shockwaves through the academic community. Additionally, we performed regression analyses to determine the extent to which History degrees could predict variations in electricity generation, yielding insights that left us positively charged with excitement.

Qualitative Inquiry:

In addition to our quantitative analyses, we dipped our toes into the waters of qualitative inquiry to probe the underlying mechanisms of this enigmatic correlation. Through a series of insightful interviews and historical research, we attempted to unravel the subtler currents at play, posing questions that sparked lively discussions and raised eyebrows in the most electrifying manner.

Ethical Considerations:

As ethical researchers, we ensured that our data collection and analysis adhered to the highest standards of academic integrity. We held ourselves accountable to the principles of transparency and rigor, electrifying the scientific process with a commitment to intellectual honesty and scholarly excellence.

Limitations and Illuminating Challenges:

It is important to acknowledge the potential limitations of our study. While we endeavored to capture a comprehensive picture of the intertwining currents of History degrees and electricity generation, there may be confounding factors and unexplored dimensions that warrant future investigation. However, as we navigated the stormy seas of interdisciplinary research, we welcomed these challenges as opportunities to shed light on new avenues of inquiry and plug into the electrifying potential of cross-disciplinary exploration.

In conclusion, our methodology fused quantitative analyses, qualitative insights, and a spark of historical inquiry to uncover the mysterious currents linking History degrees and electricity generation in Vietnam. With our approach grounded in rigorous scholarship and a flare for the unexpected, we electrified the standard research process and sparked conversations that will surely jolt the academic world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9954361, r-squared of 0.9908930, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam. Through an analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

The findings of this study suggest that there could be an electrifying connection between the academic pursuits of History and the production of electricity in Vietnam. While the link may seem unexpected, it electrifies the imagination and sparks curiosity about the broader implications of interdisciplinary research. This paper demonstrates how exploring unconventional connections can illuminate new insights and generate a buzz in both academic and industry circles.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the electrifying world of academic research, there are few things more shocking than discovering unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our current study delves into the enthralling realm of history degrees and electricity generation in Vietnam, a correlation that sends sparks flying through the conventional wisdom of education and energy production.
History is often regarded as a field that illuminates the past, but our findings suggest that it may also hold a charge for the future of energy. Meanwhile, the generation of electricity has long been associated with the movement of electrons, yet our data hints at a current of historical influence running through the production process.
This paper seeks to shed light on this surprising relationship and unravel its underlying mechanisms. By conducting a rigorous analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to shock the academic community with our findings and electrify interest in interdisciplinary research.
As we venture into this electrifying investigation, it is worth noting that the academic landscape often experiences power surges of curiosity when connections like these are brought to light. Whether this correlation is merely a statistical anomaly or a current for further exploration remains to be seen, but the potential implications are sure to spark debates and generate a buzz in both scholarly and practical circles.
Therefore, as we flip the switch on this discussion, let us embark on a journey of discovery, poised with our volts of knowledge and watts of enthusiasm. After all, when history and electricity come together, the result is truly shocking!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam during the period from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 suggests an almost electrically precise connection, while the r-squared value of 0.9908930 indicates that 99.08% of the variability in electricity generation can be explained by the number of History degrees awarded. The p-value of less than 0.01 further electrifies the significance of this relationship, providing a shockingly strong basis for its statistical validity.

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates a positively charged relationship between the two variables, with each data point appearing to be in perfect sync, as if they were conducting a harmonious electrical symphony. The close alignment of the data points visually demonstrates the striking association between the number of History degrees and electricity generation, leaving no doubt about the energy coursing through this connection.

This unexpected revelation sparks new questions and offers a jolt of excitement to the academic community, challenging conventional assumptions and igniting curiosity about the potential underlying mechanisms driving this fascinating correlation. These findings not only shed light on a surprising linkage but also serve as a powerful reminder that academic research has the capacity to generate a current of fresh perspectives, guiding us to explore uncharted territory and branch out into new fields of inquiry.

The shockingly high correlation unveiled in our study exemplifies the electrifying nature of interdisciplinary research, urging scholars to embrace unexpected connections and generate a buzz through innovative approaches. These unexpected findings serve as a potent reminder that, in the realm of academic inquiry, the quest for knowledge often illuminates hidden currents that can electrify our understanding of the world around us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam. Through an analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

The findings of this study suggest that there could be an electrifying connection between the academic pursuits of History and the production of electricity in Vietnam. While the link may seem unexpected, it electrifies the imagination and sparks curiosity about the broader implications of interdisciplinary research. This paper demonstrates how exploring unconventional connections can illuminate new insights and generate a buzz in both academic and industry circles.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between educational pursuits and industrial outcomes has long been a subject of interest in academic circles. Research by Smith (2015) highlights the impact of specialized training on workforce productivity, while Doe (2017) delves into the role of historical knowledge in shaping societal development. Furthermore, Jones (2019) provides insight into the connections between energy production and educational pathways, albeit in a broader context.
Turning to the specific context of Vietnam, historical accounts hold significant value in understanding the nation's complex past and its trajectory towards modernization. Books such as "The Vietnam War: An Intimate History" by Geoffrey C. Ward and Ken Burns, and "Vietnam: A History" by Stanley Karnow have enriched the understanding of Vietnam's historical journey. Meanwhile, literature exploring the technical aspects of electricity generation, such as "Electricity and Electronics for HVAC" by Rex Miller and Mark Miller, sheds light on the intricate mechanics at play.
As we navigate through this eclectic landscape of research and literature, it's essential to acknowledge the diverse influences that shape our understanding of these interconnected realms. In the age of internet culture, memes like "Shocked Pikachu" and "History Channel vs. Reality" serve as humorous reflections of the unexpected juxtapositions that arise in our collective consciousness. While these memes may seem lighthearted, they do pose interesting questions about the intersection of historical knowledge and technological advancements.
As we continue our pursuit of uncovering the link between Associate degrees in History and electricity generation in Vietnam, it is important to approach the subject with a sense of curiosity and open-mindedness. After all, the sparks of innovation often emerge from the unlikeliest of connections, and it is in these unconventional junctions that we uncover the true potential for transformative discoveries.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam during the period from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 suggests an almost electrically precise connection, while the r-squared value of 0.9908930 indicates that 99.08% of the variability in electricity generation can be explained by the number of History degrees awarded. The p-value of less than 0.01 further electrifies the significance of this relationship, providing a shockingly strong basis for its statistical validity.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates a positively charged relationship between the two variables, with each data point appearing to be in perfect sync, as if they were conducting a harmonious electrical symphony. The close alignment of the data points visually demonstrates the striking association between the number of History degrees and electricity generation, leaving no doubt about the energy coursing through this connection.
This unexpected revelation sparks new questions and offers a jolt of excitement to the academic community, challenging conventional assumptions and igniting curiosity about the potential underlying mechanisms driving this fascinating correlation. These findings not only shed light on a surprising linkage but also serve as a powerful reminder that academic research has the capacity to generate a current of fresh perspectives, guiding us to explore uncharted territory and branch out into new fields of inquiry.
The shockingly high correlation unveiled in our study exemplifies the electrifying nature of interdisciplinary research, urging scholars to embrace unexpected connections and generate a buzz through innovative approaches. These unexpected findings serve as a potent reminder that, in the realm of academic inquiry, the quest for knowledge often illuminates hidden currents that can electrify our understanding of the world around us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpectedly robust correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam has sparked a surge of interest in the academic community. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding the seemingly disparate realms of historical education and energy production, our results provide a shockingly strong basis for the connection, igniting a lively conversation about the electrifying potential of interdisciplinary research.

Echoing the sentiments of Smith (2015) and Doe (2017), our findings align with previous research on the impact of specialized training and historical knowledge on industrial outcomes. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and the statistically significant p-value affirm the validity of the link, electrifying the imagination and casting a new light on the potential influences of historical education on the infrastructural developments in Vietnam.

Returning to the quirky musings from the literature review, the quaint references to internet memes such as "Shocked Pikachu" and "History Channel vs. Reality" may prompt a chuckle, but they subtly underscore the essence of unexpected connections and the potential for bountiful discoveries in unconventional junctions. Indeed, the surprising alliance between historical education and electricity generation serves as a potent reminder that, in the world of research, the sparks of innovation often emerge from the unlikeliest of connections.

Our findings fuel a sense of electrifying curiosity, challenging conventional assumptions and inviting further exploration into the underlying mechanisms driving this electrifying correlation. The visually compelling scatterplot, reminiscent of a harmonious electrical symphony, vividly encapsulates the alignment between the variables, leaving no doubt about the energy coursing through this startling connection.

In conclusion, our study not only illuminates an unexpected linkage but also demonstrates the electrifying potential of interdisciplinary research. By embracing unconventional connections and generating a buzz through innovative approaches, scholars can tap into uncharted territory and uncover hidden currents that electrify our understanding of the world. This elucidative journey through the junction of historical education and electricity generation serves as a potent reminder of the transformative power lurking in surprising connections, deserving further exploration and study.

But for now, the electrifying revelation of this connection may leave us feeling positively charged and ready to plug into new avenues of inquiry, sparking fresh perspectives in academic scholarship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in History and Electricity generation in Vietnam. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam. Through an analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

The findings of this study suggest that there could be an electrifying connection between the academic pursuits of History and the production of electricity in Vietnam. While the link may seem unexpected, it electrifies the imagination and sparks curiosity about the broader implications of interdisciplinary research. This paper demonstrates how exploring unconventional connections can illuminate new insights and generate a buzz in both academic and industry circles.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the electrifying world of academic research, there are few things more shocking than discovering unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our current study delves into the enthralling realm of history degrees and electricity generation in Vietnam, a correlation that sends sparks flying through the conventional wisdom of education and energy production.
History is often regarded as a field that illuminates the past, but our findings suggest that it may also hold a charge for the future of energy. Meanwhile, the generation of electricity has long been associated with the movement of electrons, yet our data hints at a current of historical influence running through the production process.
This paper seeks to shed light on this surprising relationship and unravel its underlying mechanisms. By conducting a rigorous analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to shock the academic community with our findings and electrify interest in interdisciplinary research.
As we venture into this electrifying investigation, it is worth noting that the academic landscape often experiences power surges of curiosity when connections like these are brought to light. Whether this correlation is merely a statistical anomaly or a current for further exploration remains to be seen, but the potential implications are sure to spark debates and generate a buzz in both scholarly and practical circles.
Therefore, as we flip the switch on this discussion, let us embark on a journey of discovery, poised with our volts of knowledge and watts of enthusiasm. After all, when history and electricity come together, the result is truly shocking!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam during the period from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 suggests an almost electrically precise connection, while the r-squared value of 0.9908930 indicates that 99.08% of the variability in electricity generation can be explained by the number of History degrees awarded. The p-value of less than 0.01 further electrifies the significance of this relationship, providing a shockingly strong basis for its statistical validity.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates a positively charged relationship between the two variables, with each data point appearing to be in perfect sync, as if they were conducting a harmonious electrical symphony. The close alignment of the data points visually demonstrates the striking association between the number of History degrees and electricity generation, leaving no doubt about the energy coursing through this connection.
This unexpected revelation sparks new questions and offers a jolt of excitement to the academic community, challenging conventional assumptions and igniting curiosity about the potential underlying mechanisms driving this fascinating correlation. These findings not only shed light on a surprising linkage but also serve as a powerful reminder that academic research has the capacity to generate a current of fresh perspectives, guiding us to explore uncharted territory and branch out into new fields of inquiry.
The shockingly high correlation unveiled in our study exemplifies the electrifying nature of interdisciplinary research, urging scholars to embrace unexpected connections and generate a buzz through innovative approaches. These unexpected findings serve as a potent reminder that, in the realm of academic inquiry, the quest for knowledge often illuminates hidden currents that can electrify our understanding of the world around us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we bring this electrifying investigation to a conclusion, it is clear that the connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam is a phenomenon worthy of further exploration. The shockingly strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value underscore the need to consider this relationship with the utmost gravity. Our findings have sparked a surge of interest in the potential implications of this unanticipated linkage. The idea that history degrees and electricity generation are positively charged partners in a harmonious dance of data is both amusing and enlightening. It seems that in the realm of academic inquiry, we should be open to exploring the currents that run below the surface, even when they seem to originate from different outlets.

The potential implications of this connection are sure to generate a buzz in both academic and practical circles, as this unexpected correlation challenges conventional assumptions and generates a surge of fresh ideas. Although the field of academic research is constantly experiencing power surges of curiosity and discovery, the results of this study emphasize the potential for interdisciplinary research to yield shocking revelations that spark new questions and generate a jolt of excitement.

While it may be tempting to continue this electrifying journey of exploration, at this juncture, we must conclude that no further research is needed to demonstrate the electrifying link between History degrees and electricity generation in Vietnam. The vibrant correlation illuminated in this study is both electrifying and spark-tacular in its implications, and it is undeniably illuminating to the scholarly community. Therefore, we confidently assert that this area of investigation has been thoroughly lit up and there is currently no need for further research in this domain.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Energy Education & Historical Insights


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Historical Energy Advancements and Research (SHEAR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Connections Current: Amping Up History Degrees and Electricity Generation in Vietnam with an abstract of This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in History and electricity generation in Vietnam. Through an analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a striking correlation between the two seemingly unrelated factors, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9954361 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.
The findings of this study suggest that there could be an electrifying connection between the academic pursuits of History and the production of electricity in Vietnam. While the link may seem unexpected, it electrifies the imagination and sparks curiosity about the broader implications of interdisciplinary research. This paper demonstrates how exploring unconventional connections can illuminate new insights and generate a buzz in both academic and industry circles.

ChatGPT:

Associate degrees in History, electricity generation in Vietnam, correlation coefficient, interdisciplinary research, academic pursuits, National Center for Education Statistics, Energy Information Administration, Vietnam electricity production, unconventional connections, academic and industry impact, surprising relationship

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in History
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of History
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in History

Electricity generation in Vietnam
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Vietnam in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Vietnam

Correlation r = 0.9954361 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9908930 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Vietnam) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in History) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-10. 0.0000000001704482134475832300
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 1.7E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,866,884,608 random variables You don't actually need 5 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.98, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in History (Degrees awarded)70081191910811285160517562140241325122557
Electricity generation in Vietnam (Billion kWh)100.184113.514116.3133.449156.692173.573189.495209.513227.147231.055243.768




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([700,811,919,1081,1285,1605,1756,2140,2413,2512,2557,])
array_2 = np.array([100.184,113.514,116.3,133.449,156.692,173.573,189.495,209.513,227.147,231.055,243.768,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in History"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Vietnam"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2074 · Black Variable ID: 1257 · Red Variable ID: 24099
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0