Download png, svg
AI explanation
The cleaner air in Bay City, Michigan somehow led to a reduced demand for kerosene in Norway, possibly because Norwegian trolls who usually thrived on air pollution emissions found a new passion for yoga and clean living, leading to a nationwide decrease in kerosene use as they switched to eco-friendly alternatives like fairy dust for their midnight lamps.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that juxtaposes the cyberpunk atmosphere of Bay City, Michigan, with the serene setting of a family's cabin in Norway. In one frame, illustrate the bustling streets of Bay City, complete with neon signs, high-rise buildings, and people wearing masks to combat the smog. The scene should evoke a sense of atmospheric density and industrial decay, emphasizing the cyberpunk aesthetic. In the second frame, showcase the warm glow from the kerosene lamps in the rustic cabin nestled in the Norwegian woods. The image should capture the contrast between the polluted urban landscape and the natural, tranquil setting of the family's home. The visual should convey a striking difference in living environments and the impact of human activity on the surroundings. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Unhealthy air quality in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Cyberpunk A Discovery magazine cover image Cute cartoon A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Unhealthy air quality in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Bay City, Michigan, the air is hazy with pollutants, and people are wearing masks as they go about their day. Meanwhile, in Norway, a family is using kerosene lamps to light their cozy cabin in the woods, adding to the air pollution.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: In Bay City, Michigan, the air is hazy with pollutants, and people are wearing masks as they go about their day. Meanwhile, in Norway, a family is using kerosene lamps to light their cozy cabin in the woods, adding to the air pollution. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that juxtaposes the cyberpunk atmosphere of Bay City, Michigan, with the serene setting of a family's cabin in Norway. In one frame, illustrate the bustling streets of Bay City, complete with neon signs, high-rise buildings, and people wearing masks to combat the smog. The scene should evoke a sense of atmospheric density and industrial decay, emphasizing the cyberpunk aesthetic. In the second frame, showcase the warm glow from the kerosene lamps in the rustic cabin nestled in the Norwegian woods. The image should capture the contrast between the polluted urban landscape and the natural, tranquil setting of the family's home. The visual should convey a striking difference in living environments and the impact of human activity on the surroundings.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan caused Kerosene used in Norway to decrease.
AI academic paper
Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate The Journal of Serendipitous Synchronicities Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unexpected twist in the world of environmental studies, uncovering a peculiar link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway. Despite the apparent disconnect between these two geographical entities, our research team has uncovered a correlation that can only be described as bewildering. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we have calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. Prepare to be amazed as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations, where Bay City's smog seemingly dances in rhythm with Norway's kerosene consumption. Join us in unearthing this charming co-relato – a tale of fate that transcends borders and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unexpected twist in the world of environmental studies, uncovering a peculiar link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway. Despite the apparent disconnect between these two geographical entities, our research team has uncovered a correlation that can only be described as bewildering. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we have calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. Prepare to be amazed as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations, where Bay City's smog seemingly dances in rhythm with Norway's kerosene consumption. Join us in unearthing this charming co-relato – a tale of fate that transcends borders and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of environmental studies, we often find ourselves immersed in a sea of serious and somber discussions about air pollution, climate change, and the ever-increasing need for sustainable practices. However, every now and then, a peculiar and unexpected connection emerges, leaving us scratching our heads and marveling at the whimsical nature of the universe. Our research endeavors to shed light on one such eccentric co-relato (or quirky correlation, if you will) - the playful and perplexing link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the unassuming use of kerosene in Norway.
Picture if you will, the curious dance of Bay City's smog intermingled with the subtle scent of kerosene wafting through the fjords of Norway. While this seemingly incongruous pairing may evoke quizzical expressions and raised eyebrows, our data analysis reveals a correlation coefficient that demands attention. It's as if the environmental data itself is conspiring to entertain us, urging us to unravel the perplexing connection between these two distinct locations.
As we embark on this unexpected journey through the world of environmental correlations, we invite you to suspend your disbelief and embrace the delightful absurdity of our findings. Our mission is not merely to present data and statistics; it is to unravel a tale that transcends geographical boundaries and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to venture into the realms of Bay City Air and Norway Kero, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and the mundane takes on a whimsical charm.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unexpected twist in the world of environmental studies, uncovering a peculiar link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway. Despite the apparent disconnect between these two geographical entities, our research team has uncovered a correlation that can only be described as bewildering. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we have calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. Prepare to be amazed as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations, where Bay City's smog seemingly dances in rhythm with Norway's kerosene consumption. Join us in unearthing this charming co-relato – a tale of fate that transcends borders and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of environmental studies, we often find ourselves immersed in a sea of serious and somber discussions about air pollution, climate change, and the ever-increasing need for sustainable practices. However, every now and then, a peculiar and unexpected connection emerges, leaving us scratching our heads and marveling at the whimsical nature of the universe. Our research endeavors to shed light on one such eccentric co-relato (or quirky correlation, if you will) - the playful and perplexing link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the unassuming use of kerosene in Norway.
Picture if you will, the curious dance of Bay City's smog intermingled with the subtle scent of kerosene wafting through the fjords of Norway. While this seemingly incongruous pairing may evoke quizzical expressions and raised eyebrows, our data analysis reveals a correlation coefficient that demands attention. It's as if the environmental data itself is conspiring to entertain us, urging us to unravel the perplexing connection between these two distinct locations.
As we embark on this unexpected journey through the world of environmental correlations, we invite you to suspend your disbelief and embrace the delightful absurdity of our findings. Our mission is not merely to present data and statistics; it is to unravel a tale that transcends geographical boundaries and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to venture into the realms of Bay City Air and Norway Kero, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and the mundane takes on a whimsical charm.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Air Pollution Dynamics in Urban Environments," Smith et al. provide a comprehensive analysis of air quality in metropolitan areas, delving into the intricate web of factors contributing to the proliferation of pollutants. The authors find themselves immersed in a sea of statistical data, grappling with the complex interplay of industrial emissions, vehicular activity, and atmospheric conditions. However, amidst all the serious discussions, one cannot help but wonder if the smog in Bay City, Michigan, has a mischievous twinkle in its eye, hinting at a whimsical rendezvous across the globe.
Turning to the realm of kerosene, Doe's "The Kerosene Chronicles" offers a meticulous account of the historical and contemporary use of this enigmatic fuel. From its humble origins as a lamp oil to its modern-day applications in heating and cooking, kerosene weaves a tale that spans continents and cultures. Yet, who would have thought that the gentle glow of a kerosene lamp in a cozy Norwegian home could be entwined with the tendrils of industrial emissions thousands of miles away?
As our investigation takes an unexpected turn, we venture into the world of fiction, where Jones' "Fumes and Fjords: A Novel" introduces us to a captivating narrative set in the sprawling cityscapes of Bay City and the tranquil landscapes of Norway. Amidst the interwoven plotlines, could there be a hint of environmental mischief at play?
Drawing from unexpected sources, our analysis leads us to ponder how the whimsical escapades of "The Adventures of Captain Planet" and the enchanting lore of "FernGully: The Last Rainforest" might hold a clue to this peculiar co-relation. Could it be that even in the realm of fiction and animation, there exist subtle threads that tie together the seemingly disparate realms of air pollution and kerosene consumption?
As we continue our foray into this unconventional co-relato, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this whimsical exploration, where intercontinental correlations and environmental capers take center stage. Brace yourselves for a journey that promises to leave you both enlightened and amused, for in the world of environmental studies, even the most unexpected connections can unveil a delightful twist in the tale.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unexpected twist in the world of environmental studies, uncovering a peculiar link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway. Despite the apparent disconnect between these two geographical entities, our research team has uncovered a correlation that can only be described as bewildering. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we have calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. Prepare to be amazed as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations, where Bay City's smog seemingly dances in rhythm with Norway's kerosene consumption. Join us in unearthing this charming co-relato – a tale of fate that transcends borders and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of environmental studies, we often find ourselves immersed in a sea of serious and somber discussions about air pollution, climate change, and the ever-increasing need for sustainable practices. However, every now and then, a peculiar and unexpected connection emerges, leaving us scratching our heads and marveling at the whimsical nature of the universe. Our research endeavors to shed light on one such eccentric co-relato (or quirky correlation, if you will) - the playful and perplexing link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the unassuming use of kerosene in Norway.
Picture if you will, the curious dance of Bay City's smog intermingled with the subtle scent of kerosene wafting through the fjords of Norway. While this seemingly incongruous pairing may evoke quizzical expressions and raised eyebrows, our data analysis reveals a correlation coefficient that demands attention. It's as if the environmental data itself is conspiring to entertain us, urging us to unravel the perplexing connection between these two distinct locations.
As we embark on this unexpected journey through the world of environmental correlations, we invite you to suspend your disbelief and embrace the delightful absurdity of our findings. Our mission is not merely to present data and statistics; it is to unravel a tale that transcends geographical boundaries and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to venture into the realms of Bay City Air and Norway Kero, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and the mundane takes on a whimsical charm.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the perplexing link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey filled with data collection, statistical analyses, and a touch of good-natured bewilderment. Our data quest led us to scour the depths of the internet, armed with a hearty dose of humor and an insatiable curiosity.
First and foremost, we delved into the treasure troves of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Armed with spreadsheets, calculators, and the unyielding determination of intrepid data sleuths, we assembled a robust dataset spanning from the carefree days of 1980 through the turn of the century and beyond to 2022. As we combed through the intricate web of environmental and energy-related figures, a chorus of chuckles and the occasional gasp echoed through our research abode, for we were about to embark on an expedition quite unlike any other.
With our repository of data at the ready, we dusted off our trusty instruments of statistical wizardry and set about calculating correlation coefficients, confidence intervals, and much to our amusement, p-values that quivered with significance. The statistical dance unfolded before our eyes, as we sought to uncover the whimsical bond between Bay City's smog and Norway's kerosene consumption.
In a fervent pursuit of scholarly integrity and a dash of levity, our methodological escapade involved the use of time-series analysis, regression models, and an array of curve-fitting techniques. We embraced the quirks of our data with open arms, indulging in the occasional pun and jovial remark as we traversed the unpredictable terrain of environmental co-relatos.
The culmination of our methodological endeavor yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.6546626, sending ripples of surprise and amusement through our team. With p < 0.01 casting a gleeful twinkle in our eyes, we found ourselves staring at a bond that defied rational explanation and beckoned us further into the enigmatic maze of environmental connections.
As we unveil the meticulous steps that brought us to this unexpected juncture, we invite our esteemed readers to don their academic spectacles and immerse themselves in the delightful absurdity of our methodological journey. With a blend of statistical rigor and a touch of whimsy, we endeavored to uncover a correlation that defies convention and stands as a testament to the whimsical nature of environmental interplay. So, grab your calculators and hold onto your hats, for the journey into the world of Bay City Air and Norway Kero promises a wild ride filled with scholarly inquiry and carefree wonderment.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6546626, r-squared of 0.4285831, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unexpected twist in the world of environmental studies, uncovering a peculiar link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway. Despite the apparent disconnect between these two geographical entities, our research team has uncovered a correlation that can only be described as bewildering. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we have calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. Prepare to be amazed as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations, where Bay City's smog seemingly dances in rhythm with Norway's kerosene consumption. Join us in unearthing this charming co-relato – a tale of fate that transcends borders and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of environmental studies, we often find ourselves immersed in a sea of serious and somber discussions about air pollution, climate change, and the ever-increasing need for sustainable practices. However, every now and then, a peculiar and unexpected connection emerges, leaving us scratching our heads and marveling at the whimsical nature of the universe. Our research endeavors to shed light on one such eccentric co-relato (or quirky correlation, if you will) - the playful and perplexing link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the unassuming use of kerosene in Norway.
Picture if you will, the curious dance of Bay City's smog intermingled with the subtle scent of kerosene wafting through the fjords of Norway. While this seemingly incongruous pairing may evoke quizzical expressions and raised eyebrows, our data analysis reveals a correlation coefficient that demands attention. It's as if the environmental data itself is conspiring to entertain us, urging us to unravel the perplexing connection between these two distinct locations.
As we embark on this unexpected journey through the world of environmental correlations, we invite you to suspend your disbelief and embrace the delightful absurdity of our findings. Our mission is not merely to present data and statistics; it is to unravel a tale that transcends geographical boundaries and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to venture into the realms of Bay City Air and Norway Kero, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and the mundane takes on a whimsical charm.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our research team delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway, hoping to uncover some hidden gems of environmental correlations. Lo and behold, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626, an r-squared value of 0.4285831, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. In layman's terms, we found a pretty strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. It's as if Bay City's smog and Norway's kerosene are engaged in a whimsical tango across the globe, leaving us both perplexed and entertained.
But how strong is this correlation, you may ask? Well, let's just say it's strong enough to make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. The scatterplot in Fig. 1, which we're not allowed to show you just yet, showcases a clear and undeniable patterning that leaves no room for doubt – Bay City's pollution and Norway's kerosene are in cahoots, whether we like it or not.
Now, before you dismiss this as a mere fluke, hear us out. Our results suggest that there is indeed a curious relationship at play here, one that may defy traditional logic but nonetheless demands our attention. We're not saying that the smog in Bay City is magically traveling to Norway, or that Norwegians have suddenly developed a penchant for illuminating their homes with kerosene in solidarity – although, those would make for quite the fantastical tales, wouldn't they? No, our findings simply reveal that there's something interesting happening on the environmental front that warrants further investigation.
So, for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unexpected connection and salute the data that continues to surprise and enchant us. After all, in the world of science, sometimes the most unlikely pairings make for the most fascinating stories.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unexpected twist in the world of environmental studies, uncovering a peculiar link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway. Despite the apparent disconnect between these two geographical entities, our research team has uncovered a correlation that can only be described as bewildering. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we have calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. Prepare to be amazed as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations, where Bay City's smog seemingly dances in rhythm with Norway's kerosene consumption. Join us in unearthing this charming co-relato – a tale of fate that transcends borders and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Air Pollution Dynamics in Urban Environments," Smith et al. provide a comprehensive analysis of air quality in metropolitan areas, delving into the intricate web of factors contributing to the proliferation of pollutants. The authors find themselves immersed in a sea of statistical data, grappling with the complex interplay of industrial emissions, vehicular activity, and atmospheric conditions. However, amidst all the serious discussions, one cannot help but wonder if the smog in Bay City, Michigan, has a mischievous twinkle in its eye, hinting at a whimsical rendezvous across the globe.
Turning to the realm of kerosene, Doe's "The Kerosene Chronicles" offers a meticulous account of the historical and contemporary use of this enigmatic fuel. From its humble origins as a lamp oil to its modern-day applications in heating and cooking, kerosene weaves a tale that spans continents and cultures. Yet, who would have thought that the gentle glow of a kerosene lamp in a cozy Norwegian home could be entwined with the tendrils of industrial emissions thousands of miles away?
As our investigation takes an unexpected turn, we venture into the world of fiction, where Jones' "Fumes and Fjords: A Novel" introduces us to a captivating narrative set in the sprawling cityscapes of Bay City and the tranquil landscapes of Norway. Amidst the interwoven plotlines, could there be a hint of environmental mischief at play?
Drawing from unexpected sources, our analysis leads us to ponder how the whimsical escapades of "The Adventures of Captain Planet" and the enchanting lore of "FernGully: The Last Rainforest" might hold a clue to this peculiar co-relation. Could it be that even in the realm of fiction and animation, there exist subtle threads that tie together the seemingly disparate realms of air pollution and kerosene consumption?
As we continue our foray into this unconventional co-relato, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in this whimsical exploration, where intercontinental correlations and environmental capers take center stage. Brace yourselves for a journey that promises to leave you both enlightened and amused, for in the world of environmental studies, even the most unexpected connections can unveil a delightful twist in the tale.
[[RESULTS]]
Our research team delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway, hoping to uncover some hidden gems of environmental correlations. Lo and behold, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626, an r-squared value of 0.4285831, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. In layman's terms, we found a pretty strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. It's as if Bay City's smog and Norway's kerosene are engaged in a whimsical tango across the globe, leaving us both perplexed and entertained.
But how strong is this correlation, you may ask? Well, let's just say it's strong enough to make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. The scatterplot in Fig. 1, which we're not allowed to show you just yet, showcases a clear and undeniable patterning that leaves no room for doubt – Bay City's pollution and Norway's kerosene are in cahoots, whether we like it or not.
Now, before you dismiss this as a mere fluke, hear us out. Our results suggest that there is indeed a curious relationship at play here, one that may defy traditional logic but nonetheless demands our attention. We're not saying that the smog in Bay City is magically traveling to Norway, or that Norwegians have suddenly developed a penchant for illuminating their homes with kerosene in solidarity – although, those would make for quite the fantastical tales, wouldn't they? No, our findings simply reveal that there's something interesting happening on the environmental front that warrants further investigation.
So, for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unexpected connection and salute the data that continues to surprise and enchant us. After all, in the world of science, sometimes the most unlikely pairings make for the most fascinating stories.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings have sparked much excitement among the research team, as we unravel the enigmatic link between Bay City's smog and Norway's kerosene consumption. Our results not only validate but also deepen the whimsical undercurrents we observed in the literature review. One cannot help but reminisce about the playful intrigue we encountered while reviewing Jones' "Fumes and Fjords: A Novel." Did our data just serve as an ode to this captivating narrative? It certainly seems so.
Smith et al.'s painstaking analysis of air pollution dynamics in urban environments undoubtedly laid the groundwork for our own investigation. The serious discussions within their work contrast starkly with the unexpected twist we have encountered, akin to the solemn tone of a philosopher punctuated by the whimsical jingle of a court jester. Our statistics, much like the mischievous twinkle in Bay City's smog, seem to align with the pulse of this correlation. This prompts contemplation on the wondrous interplay of the serious and the whimsical in the realm of environmental correlations.
Similarly, Doe's deep dive into the world of kerosene, while aimed at shedding light on its historical and contemporary use, adds an ethereal hue to our findings. Who would have thought that the gentle glow of a kerosene lamp and the billowing smoke from industrial emissions could find common ground in our statistical analysis?
In "The Adventures of Captain Planet" and "FernGully: The Last Rainforest," the seemingly fanciful portrayal of environmental interdependence unexpectedly resonates with our measured correlation. It is as though fiction has transcended its boundaries to lend weight to our empirical findings. After all, who's to say that the whimsy found in fiction cannot peek through the curtains of reality, casting a fantastical glow on our scientific endeavours?
Nonetheless, our results stand firm, presenting a correlation that demands recognition. While 'cahoots' may be too light a term for the symbiotic relationship we've uncovered, there's an undeniable charm in the unexpected cohesion of these seemingly remote entities. As we move forward, it is imperative to explore the mechanisms behind this correlation and endeavor to shed light on this enchanting alliance between Bay City's air and Norway's kerosene.
And so, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this stirring caper, where the science of statistics tangoes with the allure of the unpredictable. For in the world of environmental studies, it seems that even the most unconventional connections can hold a place of honor in the tapestry of our understanding.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan and Kerosene used in Norway. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unexpected twist in the world of environmental studies, uncovering a peculiar link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway. Despite the apparent disconnect between these two geographical entities, our research team has uncovered a correlation that can only be described as bewildering. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we have calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. Prepare to be amazed as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations, where Bay City's smog seemingly dances in rhythm with Norway's kerosene consumption. Join us in unearthing this charming co-relato – a tale of fate that transcends borders and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of environmental studies, we often find ourselves immersed in a sea of serious and somber discussions about air pollution, climate change, and the ever-increasing need for sustainable practices. However, every now and then, a peculiar and unexpected connection emerges, leaving us scratching our heads and marveling at the whimsical nature of the universe. Our research endeavors to shed light on one such eccentric co-relato (or quirky correlation, if you will) - the playful and perplexing link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the unassuming use of kerosene in Norway.
Picture if you will, the curious dance of Bay City's smog intermingled with the subtle scent of kerosene wafting through the fjords of Norway. While this seemingly incongruous pairing may evoke quizzical expressions and raised eyebrows, our data analysis reveals a correlation coefficient that demands attention. It's as if the environmental data itself is conspiring to entertain us, urging us to unravel the perplexing connection between these two distinct locations.
As we embark on this unexpected journey through the world of environmental correlations, we invite you to suspend your disbelief and embrace the delightful absurdity of our findings. Our mission is not merely to present data and statistics; it is to unravel a tale that transcends geographical boundaries and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare to venture into the realms of Bay City Air and Norway Kero, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and the mundane takes on a whimsical charm.
[[RESULTS]]
Our research team delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway, hoping to uncover some hidden gems of environmental correlations. Lo and behold, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626, an r-squared value of 0.4285831, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. In layman's terms, we found a pretty strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. It's as if Bay City's smog and Norway's kerosene are engaged in a whimsical tango across the globe, leaving us both perplexed and entertained.
But how strong is this correlation, you may ask? Well, let's just say it's strong enough to make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile. The scatterplot in Fig. 1, which we're not allowed to show you just yet, showcases a clear and undeniable patterning that leaves no room for doubt – Bay City's pollution and Norway's kerosene are in cahoots, whether we like it or not.
Now, before you dismiss this as a mere fluke, hear us out. Our results suggest that there is indeed a curious relationship at play here, one that may defy traditional logic but nonetheless demands our attention. We're not saying that the smog in Bay City is magically traveling to Norway, or that Norwegians have suddenly developed a penchant for illuminating their homes with kerosene in solidarity – although, those would make for quite the fantastical tales, wouldn't they? No, our findings simply reveal that there's something interesting happening on the environmental front that warrants further investigation.
So, for now, let's revel in the whimsy of this unexpected connection and salute the data that continues to surprise and enchant us. After all, in the world of science, sometimes the most unlikely pairings make for the most fascinating stories.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations has led us to a delightful discovery - a surprising link between Bay City's smog and Norway's kerosene consumption. While the connection may seem as unlikely as a penguin in a desert, our data revels in its mischievous dance, leaving both researchers and readers in a state of bemused wonderment. It's as if the environmental forces are sharing an inside joke that we are only just beginning to understand, and we find ourselves unable to resist its charming allure.
As we wrap up this peculiar tale of fate, we acknowledge the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. After all, who wouldn't want to uncover the secrets behind this unexpected partnership? Perhaps Bay City's smog and Norway's kerosene are secretly pen pals, exchanging tales of their respective locales in a cross-continental correspondence. Or maybe there's a cosmic comedy at play, with Mother Nature herself orchestrating this whimsical waltz for her own amusement.
But fear not, dear reader, for we have arrived at a definitive conclusion. Our findings, while mysterious and mirthful, provide valuable insight into the interconnected nature of environmental phenomena. The correlation we have identified is not to be disregarded as a mere quirk of fate; rather, it beckons for further exploration and elucidation.
In the spirit of scientific discovery, we propose that no more research is needed in this area. Instead, let us revel in the delightful absurdity of Bay City Air and Norway Kero, a co-relato that reminds us of the whimsy and wonder that abound in the realm of scientific inquiry. As we bid adieu to this charming correlation, we invite our fellow researchers to embrace the unexpected, for it is often in the most unassuming connections that the true marvels of science reveal themselves. And with that, we raise a proverbial toast to the mischievous muses that continue to inspire us in our quest for knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Serendipitous Synchronicities
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Quirky Combustion Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate with an abstract of This paper presents an unexpected twist in the world of environmental studies, uncovering a peculiar link between air pollution in Bay City, Michigan, and the use of kerosene in Norway. Despite the apparent disconnect between these two geographical entities, our research team has uncovered a correlation that can only be described as bewildering. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, we have calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.6546626 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1980 to 2022. Prepare to be amazed as we embark on a journey through the whimsical world of environmental correlations, where Bay City's smog seemingly dances in rhythm with Norway's kerosene consumption. Join us in unearthing this charming co-relato – a tale of fate that transcends borders and leaves us with a chuckle and a raised eyebrow.
ChatGPT:
Bay City air pollution, Norway kerosene consumption, environmental correlation, Bay City Michigan, Norway, kerosene use, air pollution, environmental studies, EPA data, EIA data, correlation coefficient, geographical correlation, environmental fate, whimsical correlation, charming co-relato
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Bay City, MichiganDetailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Bay City, MI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan
Kerosene used in Norway
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Norway in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Norway
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.4285831 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 42.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Norway) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-6. 0.0000019134979876237483000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.65 in 0.00019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 522,603 random variables You don't actually need 522 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.44, 0.8 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan (Bad air quality days) | 6.07735 | 8.63309 | 6.37255 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.68067 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.2735 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.826446 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Kerosene used in Norway (Million Barrels/Day) | 14 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 3.72404 | 4.46849 | 5.09589 | 5.37534 | 4.95082 | 4.10411 | 3.43836 | 3.2137 | 3.27322 | 3.30411 | 3.58356 | 3.45753 | 4.04918 | 3.73699 | 3.38356 | 3.32603 | 2.45082 | 2.7452 | 2.76438 | 3.21096 | 2.71585 | 2.24658 | 2.24658 | 1.76712 | 1.3306 | 1.16164 | 1.42466 | 1.0411 | 0.73224 | 0.942466 | 0.69589 | 0.558904 | 0.530055 | 0.260274 | 0.260274 | 0.076712 | 0.032787 | 0.032877 | 0.021918 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.07735,8.63309,6.37255,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1.68067,0,0,0,4.2735,0,0,0,0,0.826446,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([14,10,7,8,3.72404,4.46849,5.09589,5.37534,4.95082,4.10411,3.43836,3.2137,3.27322,3.30411,3.58356,3.45753,4.04918,3.73699,3.38356,3.32603,2.45082,2.7452,2.76438,3.21096,2.71585,2.24658,2.24658,1.76712,1.3306,1.16164,1.42466,1.0411,0.73224,0.942466,0.69589,0.558904,0.530055,0.260274,0.260274,0.076712,0.032787,0.032877,0.021918,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Norway"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Bay City, Michigan
- Line chart for only Kerosene used in Norway
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Bay City Air and Norway Kero: A Quirky Co-Relato in Tales of Fate
Your rating is stellar!
Correlation ID: 2056 · Black Variable ID: 20336 · Red Variable ID: 24781