about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,050 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the second variable is HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Arkansas reduced GMO cotton production, there was a corresponding decrease in cotton yields. This led to a shortage of cotton, driving up the cost of non-GMO cotton. HSBC Holdings, perhaps unexpectedly, had substantial investments in non-GMO cotton futures. With their portfolios taking an unforeseen hit, the stock price of HSBC Holdings was unable to stay afloat, and it plunged like a non-GMO cotton bale in a sea of high-fructose corn syrup.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Hyper-realistic] Generate an image of a sprawling cotton field in Arkansas, where a farmer is meticulously tending to his genetically modified cotton plants. The farmer is shown in clear detail, wearing weathered overalls and a broad-brimmed hat, as he carefully examines the leaves and bolls of the cotton plants. Highlight the varying shades of green in the field, capturing the play of sunlight and shadow on the lush landscape. In the distance, place a sleek digital ticker, prominently displaying the fluctuating stock price of HSBC Holdings. Ensure that the ticker is skillfully integrated into the scene, with the numbers and graphs appearing crisp and accurate. Convey the farmer's focused dedication and the profound intersection of natural agriculture with worldwide financial dynamics through masterful attention to hyper-realistic detail. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Pop art Cutsy art illustration Macabre Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling cotton field in Arkansas, a farmer is diligently tending to his genetically modified cotton plants, carefully monitoring their growth. In the distance, a digital ticker displays the fluctuating stock price of HSBC Holdings, symbolizing the global financial impact of both GMO cotton production and the performance of the company's stock.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling cotton field in Arkansas, a farmer is diligently tending to his genetically modified cotton plants, carefully monitoring their growth. In the distance, a digital ticker displays the fluctuating stock price of HSBC Holdings, symbolizing the global financial impact of both GMO cotton production and the performance of the company's stock. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Hyper-realistic] Generate an image of a sprawling cotton field in Arkansas, where a farmer is meticulously tending to his genetically modified cotton plants. The farmer is shown in clear detail, wearing weathered overalls and a broad-brimmed hat, as he carefully examines the leaves and bolls of the cotton plants. Highlight the varying shades of green in the field, capturing the play of sunlight and shadow on the lush landscape. In the distance, place a sleek digital ticker, prominently displaying the fluctuating stock price of HSBC Holdings. Ensure that the ticker is skillfully integrated into the scene, with the numbers and graphs appearing crisp and accurate. Convey the farmer's focused dedication and the profound intersection of natural agriculture with worldwide financial dynamics through masterful attention to hyper-realistic detail.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Arkansas caused HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC) to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around

The Journal of Agricultural Finance and Biotechnology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. With a sprout of curiosity, we utilized data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to analyze the intertwined growth patterns. The results revealed a positively significant correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2022, leading us to conclude that there is indeed a connection between the two. Let's just say, the findings really "seeds" the determination for further investigation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. With a sprout of curiosity, we utilized data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to analyze the intertwined growth patterns. The results revealed a positively significant correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2022, leading us to conclude that there is indeed a connection between the two. Let's just say, the findings really "seeds" the determination for further investigation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Plowing through the vast fields of agricultural and financial data, this study aims to unravel the tangled web of connections between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the stock price of HSBC Holdings.

As we venture into this uncharted territory, we couldn't help but ponder: did the cotton GMOs and HSBC stock march to the same drumbeat, or was it all just a "cotton-pickin'" coincidence?

GMOs in cotton have long been a topic of fervent debate. Some hail them as the heroes of the agriculture world, while others view them with suspicion, like finding a cauliflower in the broccoli patch. And when it comes to stock prices, well, that's a whole different kettle of fish – or should we say, cotton bolls?

But here's the twist, folks – buckle up for this one! Our findings not only unveil a robust relationship between GMO use in cotton and HSBC's stock price, but they also highlight a correlation that's stronger than the bond between a farmer and their trusty pitchfork.

So, sit back, relax, and get ready to be "seed" by some fascinating revelations that will make you say, "Well, I'll be darned" – just like discovering a single red sock in a load of white laundry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. With a sprout of curiosity, we utilized data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to analyze the intertwined growth patterns. The results revealed a positively significant correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2022, leading us to conclude that there is indeed a connection between the two. Let's just say, the findings really "seeds" the determination for further investigation!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Plowing through the vast fields of agricultural and financial data, this study aims to unravel the tangled web of connections between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the stock price of HSBC Holdings.
As we venture into this uncharted territory, we couldn't help but ponder: did the cotton GMOs and HSBC stock march to the same drumbeat, or was it all just a "cotton-pickin'" coincidence?
GMOs in cotton have long been a topic of fervent debate. Some hail them as the heroes of the agriculture world, while others view them with suspicion, like finding a cauliflower in the broccoli patch. And when it comes to stock prices, well, that's a whole different kettle of fish – or should we say, cotton bolls?
But here's the twist, folks – buckle up for this one! Our findings not only unveil a robust relationship between GMO use in cotton and HSBC's stock price, but they also highlight a correlation that's stronger than the bond between a farmer and their trusty pitchfork.
So, sit back, relax, and get ready to be "seed" by some fascinating revelations that will make you say, "Well, I'll be darned" – just like discovering a single red sock in a load of white laundry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature surrounding the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on agricultural practices and the interplay with financial markets is both extensive and varied. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis on the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and its effects on yield and farmer profitability. Their findings suggested that GMO cotton led to significant improvements in yield and economic returns, shaking up the cotton industry like a farmer shaking a cotton boll to separate the seeds.

In "Doe's Book of Financial Alchemy," the authors delve into the intricate relationship between agricultural commodities and stock market trends, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can sprout from seemingly disparate sectors. Their insights sprout forth like a GMO seedling in the Arkansas cotton fields, igniting curiosity and prompting further investigation.

Jones' study "The Root of It All: Unearthing the Impact of GMOs on Financial Markets" explores the deep-seated implications of GMO cultivation on market dynamics. The author's analysis uncovers a network of interconnected roots between GMO usage in agriculture and the financial world, much like the intricate root system of a cotton plant.

Speaking of roots, did you hear about the botanist who crossed a Christmas tree with a coconut? He wanted to find a way to have a tree that could be decorated and then be happy when you took the decorations down, but all he got was a "palmtree."

On a more fiction-oriented note, "The Wealthy Farmer's Dilemma" by Arthur Greenleaf Holmes and "The Cotton Conspiracy" by Rebecca Cottonwood provide thought-provoking narratives that intertwine the world of agriculture and finance. These works explore speculative tales of clandestine GMO experiments and stock market shenanigans, offering a unique lens through which to ponder the convergence of cotton GMOs and stock price movements.

Not to veer off topic, but have you ever played "Stock Picking Cotton" – it's like "Stock Market" but with a hilarious twist involving cotton-themed investments. It's a real rollercoaster of emotions – just like navigating the ups and downs of financial markets.

In "Clue: Cotton Edition," players navigate through a cotton field, dodging GM crops and grappling with market fluctuations to determine the culprit behind the mysterious stock price volatility. It's a great way to bring some levity to the topic, much like a fluffy cotton ball in a serious academic paper.

How do cotton plants greet each other? They say, "Hey, bud!"

Now, back to the literature – "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis provides a gripping account of the financial crisis and the intricate web of interconnected market forces. While it may not directly address cotton GMOs, the parallels between market volatility and unexpected outcomes echo the surprising findings of our research.

Researching the impact of GMO cotton on HSBC's stock price has been anything but a "cotton-pickin'" endeavor. Our findings not only plant the seeds of curiosity but also shed light on the unlikely relationship between a humble agricultural practice and the pulse of global finance. So, grab hold of your overalls and get ready to venture into this tangled vine of agricultural and financial intrigue!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. With a sprout of curiosity, we utilized data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to analyze the intertwined growth patterns. The results revealed a positively significant correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2022, leading us to conclude that there is indeed a connection between the two. Let's just say, the findings really "seeds" the determination for further investigation!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Plowing through the vast fields of agricultural and financial data, this study aims to unravel the tangled web of connections between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the stock price of HSBC Holdings.
As we venture into this uncharted territory, we couldn't help but ponder: did the cotton GMOs and HSBC stock march to the same drumbeat, or was it all just a "cotton-pickin'" coincidence?
GMOs in cotton have long been a topic of fervent debate. Some hail them as the heroes of the agriculture world, while others view them with suspicion, like finding a cauliflower in the broccoli patch. And when it comes to stock prices, well, that's a whole different kettle of fish – or should we say, cotton bolls?
But here's the twist, folks – buckle up for this one! Our findings not only unveil a robust relationship between GMO use in cotton and HSBC's stock price, but they also highlight a correlation that's stronger than the bond between a farmer and their trusty pitchfork.
So, sit back, relax, and get ready to be "seed" by some fascinating revelations that will make you say, "Well, I'll be darned" – just like discovering a single red sock in a load of white laundry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious connection between cotton GMOs and HSBC Holdings' stock price, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis that employed a variety of data collection methods. We hopped on the information superhighway and scoured the internet for relevant data, making sure to double-check our sources and weed out any unreliable information. As they say, it's essential to separate the cotton from the chaff – and the data from the fluff.

Next, we utilized data obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to gather detailed information on cotton GMO usage in Arkansas over the period from 2002 to 2022. This allowed us to dig deep into the roots of GMO cultivation, examining how it sprouted and spread throughout the cotton fields. We carefully combed through the data, making sure to leave no fiber unturned. One might even say we were "lint-ensive" in our data collection process.

Simultaneously, we delved into the financial markets, tapping into the resources provided by LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we sifted through the stock price data for HSBC Holdings, we set out to discern any noticeable fluctuations or patterns that might correspond with the growth of cotton GMOs. It was quite the financial "crop" circle we found ourselves navigating, but we remained undaunted in our pursuit of meaningful connections.

In a particularly fun twist, we also concocted a whimsical model that involved analyzing the noise patterns emanating from cotton fields and cross-referencing them with the daily fluctuations of HSBC's stock price. We dubbed this model the "Cotton-to-Stock Symphonic Harmonizer," aiming to uncover any harmonious melodies between the buzzing buzz of GMO fields and the jazzy jazz of stock market motions. It was quite the symphony of statistical design – a veritable concerto of number crunching!

Having amassed and sorted through our hodgepodge of data, we engaged in a series of statistical analyses, applying advanced econometric methodologies to unravel any underlying relationships. Through a robust analysis, we sought to plow through the noise and discern the melody – or cacophony – underneath, ultimately aiming to shed light on the interconnected growth patterns of cotton GMOs and HSBC's stock price. It was a bit like untangling a knotted ball of yarn or, dare I say, unraveling the thread of fate itself.

Lastly, we conducted sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness of our findings, putting our results through the wringer to gauge their resilience in the face of varying conditions. After all, we wanted to ensure that our conclusions were as sturdy as a well-constructed bale of cotton – not easily unraveled by the winds of skepticism.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8583397, r-squared of 0.7367471, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. With a sprout of curiosity, we utilized data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to analyze the intertwined growth patterns. The results revealed a positively significant correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2022, leading us to conclude that there is indeed a connection between the two. Let's just say, the findings really "seeds" the determination for further investigation!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Plowing through the vast fields of agricultural and financial data, this study aims to unravel the tangled web of connections between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the stock price of HSBC Holdings.
As we venture into this uncharted territory, we couldn't help but ponder: did the cotton GMOs and HSBC stock march to the same drumbeat, or was it all just a "cotton-pickin'" coincidence?
GMOs in cotton have long been a topic of fervent debate. Some hail them as the heroes of the agriculture world, while others view them with suspicion, like finding a cauliflower in the broccoli patch. And when it comes to stock prices, well, that's a whole different kettle of fish – or should we say, cotton bolls?
But here's the twist, folks – buckle up for this one! Our findings not only unveil a robust relationship between GMO use in cotton and HSBC's stock price, but they also highlight a correlation that's stronger than the bond between a farmer and their trusty pitchfork.
So, sit back, relax, and get ready to be "seed" by some fascinating revelations that will make you say, "Well, I'll be darned" – just like discovering a single red sock in a load of white laundry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from 2002 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. This strong correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.7367471, provides evidence of a meaningful and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It's as if the cotton and stock markets were cotton-pickin' comrades, marching together in sync!

The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving little room for doubt about the connection between GMO use in cotton and HSBC stock prices. This correlation is so significant, it's as if the cotton and stock markets were playing a game of "hide and seed" – but now, their connection has been exposed for all to see!

In Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates this robust relationship, showcasing the trend line that seems to weave through the data points with a synchronicity that can only be likened to a carefully choreographed dance. It's a visual representation that leaves one thinking, "Gee, I never knew cotton and stocks had so much in common – it's quite the tangled web they weave!"

Overall, these findings provide compelling evidence of the link between GMO usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. The results of this study certainly leave little room for skepticism and raise intriguing questions about the nature of this unique correlation. It's safe to say that these findings are definitely not just another case of "cotton-pickin' coincidence"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. With a sprout of curiosity, we utilized data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to analyze the intertwined growth patterns. The results revealed a positively significant correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2022, leading us to conclude that there is indeed a connection between the two. Let's just say, the findings really "seeds" the determination for further investigation!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on agricultural practices and the interplay with financial markets is both extensive and varied. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis on the adoption of GMO cotton in Arkansas and its effects on yield and farmer profitability. Their findings suggested that GMO cotton led to significant improvements in yield and economic returns, shaking up the cotton industry like a farmer shaking a cotton boll to separate the seeds.
In "Doe's Book of Financial Alchemy," the authors delve into the intricate relationship between agricultural commodities and stock market trends, shedding light on the unexpected connections that can sprout from seemingly disparate sectors. Their insights sprout forth like a GMO seedling in the Arkansas cotton fields, igniting curiosity and prompting further investigation.
Jones' study "The Root of It All: Unearthing the Impact of GMOs on Financial Markets" explores the deep-seated implications of GMO cultivation on market dynamics. The author's analysis uncovers a network of interconnected roots between GMO usage in agriculture and the financial world, much like the intricate root system of a cotton plant.
Speaking of roots, did you hear about the botanist who crossed a Christmas tree with a coconut? He wanted to find a way to have a tree that could be decorated and then be happy when you took the decorations down, but all he got was a "palmtree."
On a more fiction-oriented note, "The Wealthy Farmer's Dilemma" by Arthur Greenleaf Holmes and "The Cotton Conspiracy" by Rebecca Cottonwood provide thought-provoking narratives that intertwine the world of agriculture and finance. These works explore speculative tales of clandestine GMO experiments and stock market shenanigans, offering a unique lens through which to ponder the convergence of cotton GMOs and stock price movements.
Not to veer off topic, but have you ever played "Stock Picking Cotton" – it's like "Stock Market" but with a hilarious twist involving cotton-themed investments. It's a real rollercoaster of emotions – just like navigating the ups and downs of financial markets.
In "Clue: Cotton Edition," players navigate through a cotton field, dodging GM crops and grappling with market fluctuations to determine the culprit behind the mysterious stock price volatility. It's a great way to bring some levity to the topic, much like a fluffy cotton ball in a serious academic paper.
How do cotton plants greet each other? They say, "Hey, bud!"
Now, back to the literature – "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis provides a gripping account of the financial crisis and the intricate web of interconnected market forces. While it may not directly address cotton GMOs, the parallels between market volatility and unexpected outcomes echo the surprising findings of our research.
Researching the impact of GMO cotton on HSBC's stock price has been anything but a "cotton-pickin'" endeavor. Our findings not only plant the seeds of curiosity but also shed light on the unlikely relationship between a humble agricultural practice and the pulse of global finance. So, grab hold of your overalls and get ready to venture into this tangled vine of agricultural and financial intrigue!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 2002 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. This strong correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.7367471, provides evidence of a meaningful and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It's as if the cotton and stock markets were cotton-pickin' comrades, marching together in sync!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving little room for doubt about the connection between GMO use in cotton and HSBC stock prices. This correlation is so significant, it's as if the cotton and stock markets were playing a game of "hide and seed" – but now, their connection has been exposed for all to see!
In Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates this robust relationship, showcasing the trend line that seems to weave through the data points with a synchronicity that can only be likened to a carefully choreographed dance. It's a visual representation that leaves one thinking, "Gee, I never knew cotton and stocks had so much in common – it's quite the tangled web they weave!"
Overall, these findings provide compelling evidence of the link between GMO usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. The results of this study certainly leave little room for skepticism and raise intriguing questions about the nature of this unique correlation. It's safe to say that these findings are definitely not just another case of "cotton-pickin' coincidence"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have unearthed a fascinating link between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings, enhancing our understanding of the unexpected interplay between agriculture and finance. The positively significant correlation coefficient further supports the body of literature that has hinted at the intricate relationship between agricultural practices and financial market movements, emphasizing that their connection is not just a "GMO-ment" of happenstance.

Our findings align with the comprehensive analysis conducted by Smith et al. (2015), who highlighted the substantial improvements in yield and economic returns associated with GMO cotton. It's as if the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation breathed new life into the industry, turning it into a true "cash crop" – and with the correlation we identified, it seems that these improvements also extend to influencing stock market trends. The unexpected relationship we observed reminds me of the time I tried to grow money on trees, but all I got were "bills" from the electricity company!

Similarly, "Doe's Book of Financial Alchemy" illuminated the potential interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors, much like our study exposes the unseen threads linking cotton GMO usage and stock price movements. It feels like discovering a secret passage in a maze – unexpected but undeniably present! This revelation recalls the time I tried to make a belt out of watches, but it was a waist of time – much like dismissing the potential connection between cotton GMOs and stock prices.

The p-value of less than 0.01 in our study adds weight to the previously speculative narratives found in "The Cotton Conspiracy" and "The Wealthy Farmer's Dilemma," which hinted at clandestine GMO experiments and stock market shenanigans. This correlation is so significant; it's almost as if the cotton and stock markets were playing a game of "hide and seed" – and now, the secret is out! These unexpected parallels between agriculture and finance are like stumbling upon a treasure chest in the field, proving that these unlikely connections are more than just a "bale of laughs."

In conclusion, our study not only contributes to the burgeoning field of agriculturally-influenced financial market analysis but also provides a platform for further investigations into the curious correlations that lie beneath the surface of economic landscapes. The unexpected camaraderie between cotton and stock markets is a constant reminder that in the world of finance, just like in life, there is always more than meets the eye. It's like finding an unexpected surprise in the pocket of your overalls – you never know what connections might "crop" up next!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. With a sprout of curiosity, we utilized data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to analyze the intertwined growth patterns. The results revealed a positively significant correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2022, leading us to conclude that there is indeed a connection between the two. Let's just say, the findings really "seeds" the determination for further investigation!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Plowing through the vast fields of agricultural and financial data, this study aims to unravel the tangled web of connections between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the stock price of HSBC Holdings.
As we venture into this uncharted territory, we couldn't help but ponder: did the cotton GMOs and HSBC stock march to the same drumbeat, or was it all just a "cotton-pickin'" coincidence?
GMOs in cotton have long been a topic of fervent debate. Some hail them as the heroes of the agriculture world, while others view them with suspicion, like finding a cauliflower in the broccoli patch. And when it comes to stock prices, well, that's a whole different kettle of fish – or should we say, cotton bolls?
But here's the twist, folks – buckle up for this one! Our findings not only unveil a robust relationship between GMO use in cotton and HSBC's stock price, but they also highlight a correlation that's stronger than the bond between a farmer and their trusty pitchfork.
So, sit back, relax, and get ready to be "seed" by some fascinating revelations that will make you say, "Well, I'll be darned" – just like discovering a single red sock in a load of white laundry.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 2002 to 2022 revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. This strong correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.7367471, provides evidence of a meaningful and positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities. It's as if the cotton and stock markets were cotton-pickin' comrades, marching together in sync!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving little room for doubt about the connection between GMO use in cotton and HSBC stock prices. This correlation is so significant, it's as if the cotton and stock markets were playing a game of "hide and seed" – but now, their connection has been exposed for all to see!
In Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates this robust relationship, showcasing the trend line that seems to weave through the data points with a synchronicity that can only be likened to a carefully choreographed dance. It's a visual representation that leaves one thinking, "Gee, I never knew cotton and stocks had so much in common – it's quite the tangled web they weave!"
Overall, these findings provide compelling evidence of the link between GMO usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. The results of this study certainly leave little room for skepticism and raise intriguing questions about the nature of this unique correlation. It's safe to say that these findings are definitely not just another case of "cotton-pickin' coincidence"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our exploration into the relationship between GMO usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings has certainly unraveled a fascinating tale of interconnected growth. The significant correlation coefficient and r-squared value painted a picture of synergy between these two seemingly disparate entities, highlighting a connection stronger than a pair of overalls on a hot summer day. This correlation is so solid, it's almost as if they were saying, "C'mon, give us some cred-knee"!

The p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the validity of this association, leaving little room for skepticism about the influence of cotton GMOs on HSBC's stock price. It's as if the cotton and stock markets were yanking our chains, but the evidence has really "seeded" itself in the data.

Figure 1's scatterplot danced with synchronicity, reminding us that in the realm of data, even cotton and stocks can tango together. Who would've thought they had more in common than a love for capital growth? It's like discovering that your chicken crossed the road because it heard about a great stock deal on the other side!

In light of these findings, we can confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area. The field has been thoroughly plowed, and we've gathered enough cotton and stock to last us a lifetime. So, let's hang up our data hats and celebrate this "stalk"ingly good conclusion!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Finance and Biotechnology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Biotech Economics and Agricultural Markets (SBEAM)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cotton GMOs and HSBC Stock: A Data Plot That's Not Cotton-Pickin' Around with an abstract of Our study delves into the enigmatic relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) usage in cotton farming in Arkansas and the stock price of HSBC Holdings. With a sprout of curiosity, we utilized data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to analyze the intertwined growth patterns. The results revealed a positively significant correlation coefficient of 0.8583397 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 2002 to 2022, leading us to conclude that there is indeed a connection between the two. Let's just say, the findings really "seeds" the determination for further investigation!

ChatGPT:

Cotton farming, genetically modified organisms, GMOs, HSBC stock, Arkansas, USDA data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, p-value, stock price analysis, agriculture, finance, cotton industry, biotechnology, stock market, quantitative analysis, data correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Arkansas that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Arkansas

HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC)
Detailed data title: Opening price of HSBC Holdings (HSBC) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC)

Correlation r = 0.8583397 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7367471 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Arkansas) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.5E-7. 0.0000006450778010595423000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 6.5E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,550,201 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Arkansas (GMO cotton %)272434422832302820181022137779712116
HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC) (Stock price)59.4655.6279.4185.0881.0992.9983.7748.5758.0951.3238.8454.3654.6947.338.341.075240.3739.1426.0630.38




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([27,24,34,42,28,32,30,28,20,18,10,22,13,7,7,7,9,7,12,11,6,])
array_2 = np.array([59.46,55.62,79.41,85.08,81.09,92.99,83.77,48.57,58.09,51.32,38.84,54.36,54.69,47.3,38.3,41.07,52,40.37,39.14,26.06,30.38,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "HSBC Holdings' stock price (HSBC)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 2050 · Black Variable ID: 768 · Red Variable ID: 1593
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0