about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,985 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Arson in Maine and the second variable is Kerosene used in Turkiye.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of arson cases in Maine decreased, there was a proportional decrease in the demand for firefighters' services. With fewer fires to extinguish, the need for kerosene-fueled firefighting equipment decreased as well. This led to a reduction in the overall consumption of kerosene in Turkiye, as the firefighting industry had less need for this particular flammable liquid. This unexpected ripple effect highlights the interconnectedness of global kerosene usage and the surprising impact of arson trends in a seemingly unrelated location.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [An impressionist painting] In a field in Maine, a small wooden cabin is engulfed in flames, with thick pillars of smoke rising into the air. Neighboring trees and grass are also catching fire, creating a chaotic and intense scene. Meanwhile, in a market in Turkey, a woman is pouring kerosene from a metal can into a lantern to light up the evening, with the warm glow of the flame contrasting against the darkness of the surroundings. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave Oragami a Polaroid photo 3D Pixar Style Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Maine, a small wooden cabin is engulfed in flames, with thick pillars of smoke rising into the air. Neighboring trees and grass are also catching fire, creating a chaotic scene. Meanwhile, in a market in Turkey, a woman is pouring kerosene from a metal can into a lantern to light up the evening, with the warm glow of the flame contrasting against the darkness of the surroundings.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Maine, a small wooden cabin is engulfed in flames, with thick pillars of smoke rising into the air. Neighboring trees and grass are also catching fire, creating a chaotic scene. Meanwhile, in a market in Turkey, a woman is pouring kerosene from a metal can into a lantern to light up the evening, with the warm glow of the flame contrasting against the darkness of the surroundings. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [An impressionist painting] In a field in Maine, a small wooden cabin is engulfed in flames, with thick pillars of smoke rising into the air. Neighboring trees and grass are also catching fire, creating a chaotic and intense scene. Meanwhile, in a market in Turkey, a woman is pouring kerosene from a metal can into a lantern to light up the evening, with the warm glow of the flame contrasting against the darkness of the surroundings.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in Maine caused Kerosene used in Turkiye to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye

The Journal of Fire Dynamics and Socioeconomic Patterns

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in the state of Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. We delve into this fiery topic by analyzing data obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, covering the time period from 1985 to 2022. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly unconnected phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01.

As we set out to explore this hot topic, we couldn't help but notice the sparks of curiosity igniting within us. With this conflagration of data at our fingertips, we ventured to shed light on this incendiary relationship. It's not every day that one gets to grapple with the burning question of how arson in Maine and kerosene usage in Turkiye might be intertwined.

We navigated through the murky waters of statistical analysis, aiming to blaze a trail through the complexities of these disparate variables. Our findings left us all in a heated discussion, as we pondered the implications of this unexpected connection. While skeptics might dismiss our discoveries as mere statistical smoke and mirrors, our robust analysis kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations.

In conclusion, our research brings a new spark of insight into the world of fire-related phenomena. The flames of curiosity have been stoked, and the smoldering embers of discourse have been fanned. Who knew that the link between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye could be so hotly debated?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in the state of Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. We delve into this fiery topic by analyzing data obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, covering the time period from 1985 to 2022. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly unconnected phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01.

As we set out to explore this hot topic, we couldn't help but notice the sparks of curiosity igniting within us. With this conflagration of data at our fingertips, we ventured to shed light on this incendiary relationship. It's not every day that one gets to grapple with the burning question of how arson in Maine and kerosene usage in Turkiye might be intertwined.

We navigated through the murky waters of statistical analysis, aiming to blaze a trail through the complexities of these disparate variables. Our findings left us all in a heated discussion, as we pondered the implications of this unexpected connection. While skeptics might dismiss our discoveries as mere statistical smoke and mirrors, our robust analysis kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations.

In conclusion, our research brings a new spark of insight into the world of fire-related phenomena. The flames of curiosity have been stoked, and the smoldering embers of discourse have been fanned. Who knew that the link between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye could be so hotly debated?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The study of the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and laypeople alike. In the realm of arson incidents in Maine, USA, and kerosene consumption in Turkiye, this curiosity is particularly piqued. As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in this case, it seems there may be more to the correlation than meets the eye.

We approach this investigation with a burning desire to uncover the intricacies of this unexpected connection. It's not often that one delves into the world of arson and kerosene usage and comes out unscathed, but we are prepared to brave the flames, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a steadfast commitment to uncovering the truth.

The sparks of curiosity that initially ignited this study have propelled us into uncharted territory, where the heat of investigation knows no bounds. Our aim is to shed light on the smoldering link between these disparate variables and illuminate the path toward a greater understanding of their interplay. As we embark on this fiery journey, we are mindful of the old adage: "Fight fire with statistics."

Drawing on data spanning nearly four decades, we set out to blaze a trail through the complexities of the relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Our findings promise to ignite a new conversation about the correlation, challenging conventional wisdom and kindling a renewed interest in the potential connections lying beneath the surface.

In the course of our investigation, we have encountered challenges that were, quite literally, of a combustible nature. However, our unwavering dedication to unraveling the mystery has led us to the doorstep of a discovery that has the potential to set the field ablaze with discussion. Our findings are sure to spark debate and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike.

As we set the stage for the unveiling of our research findings, it's worth remembering the timeless wisdom of fire safety: "Don't play with matches." But in the realm of academic inquiry, perhaps it's time to play with fire and see where the sparks may lead us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in the state of Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. We delve into this fiery topic by analyzing data obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, covering the time period from 1985 to 2022. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly unconnected phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01.

As we set out to explore this hot topic, we couldn't help but notice the sparks of curiosity igniting within us. With this conflagration of data at our fingertips, we ventured to shed light on this incendiary relationship. It's not every day that one gets to grapple with the burning question of how arson in Maine and kerosene usage in Turkiye might be intertwined.

We navigated through the murky waters of statistical analysis, aiming to blaze a trail through the complexities of these disparate variables. Our findings left us all in a heated discussion, as we pondered the implications of this unexpected connection. While skeptics might dismiss our discoveries as mere statistical smoke and mirrors, our robust analysis kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations.

In conclusion, our research brings a new spark of insight into the world of fire-related phenomena. The flames of curiosity have been stoked, and the smoldering embers of discourse have been fanned. Who knew that the link between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye could be so hotly debated?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and laypeople alike. In the realm of arson incidents in Maine, USA, and kerosene consumption in Turkiye, this curiosity is particularly piqued. As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in this case, it seems there may be more to the correlation than meets the eye.
We approach this investigation with a burning desire to uncover the intricacies of this unexpected connection. It's not often that one delves into the world of arson and kerosene usage and comes out unscathed, but we are prepared to brave the flames, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a steadfast commitment to uncovering the truth.
The sparks of curiosity that initially ignited this study have propelled us into uncharted territory, where the heat of investigation knows no bounds. Our aim is to shed light on the smoldering link between these disparate variables and illuminate the path toward a greater understanding of their interplay. As we embark on this fiery journey, we are mindful of the old adage: "Fight fire with statistics."
Drawing on data spanning nearly four decades, we set out to blaze a trail through the complexities of the relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Our findings promise to ignite a new conversation about the correlation, challenging conventional wisdom and kindling a renewed interest in the potential connections lying beneath the surface.
In the course of our investigation, we have encountered challenges that were, quite literally, of a combustible nature. However, our unwavering dedication to unraveling the mystery has led us to the doorstep of a discovery that has the potential to set the field ablaze with discussion. Our findings are sure to spark debate and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike.
As we set the stage for the unveiling of our research findings, it's worth remembering the timeless wisdom of fire safety: "Don't play with matches." But in the realm of academic inquiry, perhaps it's time to play with fire and see where the sparks may lead us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between arson incidents in urban areas and the availability of flammable materials, such as kerosene. This insightful study sheds light on the potential link between arson and the presence of accelerants, offering a spark of curiosity for further investigation.

Speaking of accelerants, did you hear about the guy who was arrested for starting a fire using kerosene in Turkey? He claims he was just trying to make a quick buck. It seems he wanted to turn the Turkish economy into a burning sensation!

Jones and Doe examine the impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of arson. Their findings suggest a potential connection between kerosene consumption and arson rates, particularly in regions with colder climates. This research ignites a flame of interest in understanding how external conditions may influence fire-related incidents.

These studies are not the only ones fanning the flames of curiosity on this topic. Many real-life and fictional works also touch upon the relationship between arson and flammable materials. In "Fire Science: A Comprehensive Guide," the authors delve into the chemistry and behavior of various accelerants, including kerosene, offering a blazing hot exploration of their potential role in arson incidents.

On the lighter side (pun intended), fiction also has its fair share of fiery tales. In "Firestarter" by Stephen King, the protagonist possesses pyrokinetic abilities, adding fuel to the age-old debate of nature versus nurture in fire-related phenomena. This novel certainly sets the literary world ablaze with its fiery narrative.

And let's not forget the animated world, where fire and kerosene have made noteworthy appearances. In the beloved children's show "SpongeBob SquarePants," the character SpongeBob once took up a job as a fry cook, a role that often involved the use of flammable cooking materials. Who knew that a cartoon sponge could kindle a fire-related debate?

Meanwhile, the educational animated series "Bill Nye the Science Guy" provides an enlightening exploration of the science behind combustion, highlighting the role of accelerants like kerosene in fueling fires. Bill Nye always did know how to spark an interest in scientific concepts.

As we navigate through this literature, it's clear that the connection between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye is a topic that continues to ignite fascination and dialogue across various contexts. The intersection of real-world data, literary works, and popular media reveals a multifaceted exploration of this flammable link, leaving no tinder unturned in our quest for understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in the state of Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. We delve into this fiery topic by analyzing data obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, covering the time period from 1985 to 2022. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly unconnected phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01.

As we set out to explore this hot topic, we couldn't help but notice the sparks of curiosity igniting within us. With this conflagration of data at our fingertips, we ventured to shed light on this incendiary relationship. It's not every day that one gets to grapple with the burning question of how arson in Maine and kerosene usage in Turkiye might be intertwined.

We navigated through the murky waters of statistical analysis, aiming to blaze a trail through the complexities of these disparate variables. Our findings left us all in a heated discussion, as we pondered the implications of this unexpected connection. While skeptics might dismiss our discoveries as mere statistical smoke and mirrors, our robust analysis kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations.

In conclusion, our research brings a new spark of insight into the world of fire-related phenomena. The flames of curiosity have been stoked, and the smoldering embers of discourse have been fanned. Who knew that the link between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye could be so hotly debated?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and laypeople alike. In the realm of arson incidents in Maine, USA, and kerosene consumption in Turkiye, this curiosity is particularly piqued. As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in this case, it seems there may be more to the correlation than meets the eye.
We approach this investigation with a burning desire to uncover the intricacies of this unexpected connection. It's not often that one delves into the world of arson and kerosene usage and comes out unscathed, but we are prepared to brave the flames, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a steadfast commitment to uncovering the truth.
The sparks of curiosity that initially ignited this study have propelled us into uncharted territory, where the heat of investigation knows no bounds. Our aim is to shed light on the smoldering link between these disparate variables and illuminate the path toward a greater understanding of their interplay. As we embark on this fiery journey, we are mindful of the old adage: "Fight fire with statistics."
Drawing on data spanning nearly four decades, we set out to blaze a trail through the complexities of the relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Our findings promise to ignite a new conversation about the correlation, challenging conventional wisdom and kindling a renewed interest in the potential connections lying beneath the surface.
In the course of our investigation, we have encountered challenges that were, quite literally, of a combustible nature. However, our unwavering dedication to unraveling the mystery has led us to the doorstep of a discovery that has the potential to set the field ablaze with discussion. Our findings are sure to spark debate and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike.
As we set the stage for the unveiling of our research findings, it's worth remembering the timeless wisdom of fire safety: "Don't play with matches." But in the realm of academic inquiry, perhaps it's time to play with fire and see where the sparks may lead us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our scorching journey into the realm of arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye, we employed a multifaceted approach that involved a fusion of statistical analyses and data mining techniques. Gather round, as we walk you through this methodological inferno!

First, we harnessed the power of the internet – the ultimate hotspot of information – to gather data on arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Our primary sources included the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services for arson data and the Energy Information Administration for kerosene consumption data. We meticulously sifted through a plethora of online archives, igniting our passion for data collection and stoking the flames of curiosity.

Before delving into the statistical analysis, we took a deep dive into the historical context of arson and kerosene usage, seeking to understand the socioeconomic and environmental factors that might contribute to the observed correlation. We engaged in some fiery debates within our research team, pondering the implications of our preliminary findings and battling the urge to make "hot takes" on the matter.

Now, here's where the heat turned up a notch. To establish the degree of association between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye, we employed a robust statistical method that would withstand the searing scrutiny of peer review. Our approach incorporated a time-series analysis to capture the dynamic nature of the data, fanning the flames of analytical rigor. We must admit, this part of our methodology was like handling a statistical flamethrower – we had to be cautious not to get burned by faulty assumptions or spurious correlations.

In an effort to avoid getting our fingers burnt by biased interpretations, we calculated the correlation coefficient between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Lo and behold, the coefficient was so staggering that it almost set our statistical software ablaze! Our findings revealed a positively sizzling correlation coefficient of 0.8874497, with a significance level of p < 0.01. This statistical bonfire of a result left us in awe, as we contemplated the incendiary implications of this unexpected relationship.

To add another layer of complexity to our methodological cauldron, we performed a regression analysis to model the relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. This allowed us to quantify the extent to which changes in one variable could predict changes in the other, heating up our understanding of the underlying mechanisms at play. It was akin to conducting a statistical tango – we had to lead the variables with finesse and interpret the dance of coefficients with precision.

As we emerged from the statistical crucible, we were armed with a comprehensive understanding of the connection between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Our methodology, much like a well-tended bonfire, was designed to shed light on this fiery paradox and offer a beacon of statistical clarity amidst the darkness of uncertainty.

To conclude this section, we leave you with a statistician's favorite dad joke: Why was the statistician unimpressed with the pun? Because it was 'mean' and 'median' at best!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8874497, r-squared of 0.7875670, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in the state of Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. We delve into this fiery topic by analyzing data obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, covering the time period from 1985 to 2022. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly unconnected phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01.

As we set out to explore this hot topic, we couldn't help but notice the sparks of curiosity igniting within us. With this conflagration of data at our fingertips, we ventured to shed light on this incendiary relationship. It's not every day that one gets to grapple with the burning question of how arson in Maine and kerosene usage in Turkiye might be intertwined.

We navigated through the murky waters of statistical analysis, aiming to blaze a trail through the complexities of these disparate variables. Our findings left us all in a heated discussion, as we pondered the implications of this unexpected connection. While skeptics might dismiss our discoveries as mere statistical smoke and mirrors, our robust analysis kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations.

In conclusion, our research brings a new spark of insight into the world of fire-related phenomena. The flames of curiosity have been stoked, and the smoldering embers of discourse have been fanned. Who knew that the link between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye could be so hotly debated?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and laypeople alike. In the realm of arson incidents in Maine, USA, and kerosene consumption in Turkiye, this curiosity is particularly piqued. As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in this case, it seems there may be more to the correlation than meets the eye.
We approach this investigation with a burning desire to uncover the intricacies of this unexpected connection. It's not often that one delves into the world of arson and kerosene usage and comes out unscathed, but we are prepared to brave the flames, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a steadfast commitment to uncovering the truth.
The sparks of curiosity that initially ignited this study have propelled us into uncharted territory, where the heat of investigation knows no bounds. Our aim is to shed light on the smoldering link between these disparate variables and illuminate the path toward a greater understanding of their interplay. As we embark on this fiery journey, we are mindful of the old adage: "Fight fire with statistics."
Drawing on data spanning nearly four decades, we set out to blaze a trail through the complexities of the relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Our findings promise to ignite a new conversation about the correlation, challenging conventional wisdom and kindling a renewed interest in the potential connections lying beneath the surface.
In the course of our investigation, we have encountered challenges that were, quite literally, of a combustible nature. However, our unwavering dedication to unraveling the mystery has led us to the doorstep of a discovery that has the potential to set the field ablaze with discussion. Our findings are sure to spark debate and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike.
As we set the stage for the unveiling of our research findings, it's worth remembering the timeless wisdom of fire safety: "Don't play with matches." But in the realm of academic inquiry, perhaps it's time to play with fire and see where the sparks may lead us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 between arson incidents in Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye over the time period from 1985 to 2022. This strong positive correlation indicates that as arson incidents in Maine increased, kerosene consumption in Turkiye also showed a marked rise. The r-squared value of 0.7875670 further emphasizes the high degree of relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. The data points form a clear upward trend, visually capturing the fiery association between these two phenomena.

As we delved into the analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the irony of uncovering a scorching connection between arson and kerosene. It seems that in the world of statistical correlations, sometimes the findings can be quite "hot" indeed.

Our deep dive into the data not only revealed a compelling correlation but also sparked a newfound appreciation for the unexpected relationships that can emerge in the realm of empirical research. The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidified the statistical validity of our findings, leaving little doubt about the meaningful association between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye.

In the words of renowned firefighter and statistician, "When there's smoke, there's a p-value." While the initial combination of arson and kerosene consumption may strike one as odd, our analysis has illuminated the underlying pattern, setting the stage for further exploration of this heated correlation.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the fiery relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, one must always be prepared for unexpected flare-ups of correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in the state of Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. We delve into this fiery topic by analyzing data obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, covering the time period from 1985 to 2022. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly unconnected phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01.

As we set out to explore this hot topic, we couldn't help but notice the sparks of curiosity igniting within us. With this conflagration of data at our fingertips, we ventured to shed light on this incendiary relationship. It's not every day that one gets to grapple with the burning question of how arson in Maine and kerosene usage in Turkiye might be intertwined.

We navigated through the murky waters of statistical analysis, aiming to blaze a trail through the complexities of these disparate variables. Our findings left us all in a heated discussion, as we pondered the implications of this unexpected connection. While skeptics might dismiss our discoveries as mere statistical smoke and mirrors, our robust analysis kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations.

In conclusion, our research brings a new spark of insight into the world of fire-related phenomena. The flames of curiosity have been stoked, and the smoldering embers of discourse have been fanned. Who knew that the link between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye could be so hotly debated?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between arson incidents in urban areas and the availability of flammable materials, such as kerosene. This insightful study sheds light on the potential link between arson and the presence of accelerants, offering a spark of curiosity for further investigation.
Speaking of accelerants, did you hear about the guy who was arrested for starting a fire using kerosene in Turkey? He claims he was just trying to make a quick buck. It seems he wanted to turn the Turkish economy into a burning sensation!
Jones and Doe examine the impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of arson. Their findings suggest a potential connection between kerosene consumption and arson rates, particularly in regions with colder climates. This research ignites a flame of interest in understanding how external conditions may influence fire-related incidents.
These studies are not the only ones fanning the flames of curiosity on this topic. Many real-life and fictional works also touch upon the relationship between arson and flammable materials. In "Fire Science: A Comprehensive Guide," the authors delve into the chemistry and behavior of various accelerants, including kerosene, offering a blazing hot exploration of their potential role in arson incidents.
On the lighter side (pun intended), fiction also has its fair share of fiery tales. In "Firestarter" by Stephen King, the protagonist possesses pyrokinetic abilities, adding fuel to the age-old debate of nature versus nurture in fire-related phenomena. This novel certainly sets the literary world ablaze with its fiery narrative.
And let's not forget the animated world, where fire and kerosene have made noteworthy appearances. In the beloved children's show "SpongeBob SquarePants," the character SpongeBob once took up a job as a fry cook, a role that often involved the use of flammable cooking materials. Who knew that a cartoon sponge could kindle a fire-related debate?
Meanwhile, the educational animated series "Bill Nye the Science Guy" provides an enlightening exploration of the science behind combustion, highlighting the role of accelerants like kerosene in fueling fires. Bill Nye always did know how to spark an interest in scientific concepts.
As we navigate through this literature, it's clear that the connection between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye is a topic that continues to ignite fascination and dialogue across various contexts. The intersection of real-world data, literary works, and popular media reveals a multifaceted exploration of this flammable link, leaving no tinder unturned in our quest for understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 between arson incidents in Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye over the time period from 1985 to 2022. This strong positive correlation indicates that as arson incidents in Maine increased, kerosene consumption in Turkiye also showed a marked rise. The r-squared value of 0.7875670 further emphasizes the high degree of relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. The data points form a clear upward trend, visually capturing the fiery association between these two phenomena.
As we delved into the analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the irony of uncovering a scorching connection between arson and kerosene. It seems that in the world of statistical correlations, sometimes the findings can be quite "hot" indeed.
Our deep dive into the data not only revealed a compelling correlation but also sparked a newfound appreciation for the unexpected relationships that can emerge in the realm of empirical research. The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidified the statistical validity of our findings, leaving little doubt about the meaningful association between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye.
In the words of renowned firefighter and statistician, "When there's smoke, there's a p-value." While the initial combination of arson and kerosene consumption may strike one as odd, our analysis has illuminated the underlying pattern, setting the stage for further exploration of this heated correlation.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the fiery relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, one must always be prepared for unexpected flare-ups of correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The scorching correlation uncovered in our study between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye sets the stage for a fiery discussion. Our findings not only aligned with prior research but also added glowing embers of evidence to this flammable connection.

The data presented a compelling narrative, akin to a suspenseful thriller with unexpected twists and turns. As we pondered the implications of this unexpected correlation, it became clear that statistical analysis can indeed unearth surprising revelations. It's as if a statistical inferno had ignited within the empirical world, illuminating the hitherto obscured relationship between arson and kerosene consumption.

Our results echo the findings of Smith et al., who highlighted the potential link between arson and the availability of accelerants. In a similar vein, our study provides an incandescent confirmation of this connection, reinforcing the notion that the presence of flammable materials such as kerosene may indeed fuel arson incidents. It's almost as if the secret ingredient in this statistical recipe for correlation was a dash of kerosene, serving to stoke the flames of association.

It's worth noting the humorous coincidence that while our research delves into the fiery connection between arson and kerosene, the sparks of interest have also been ignited in popular media and literature. This amusing alignment of our serious empirical study with more lighthearted narrative explorations serves as a reminder that unexpected links are not just confined to statistical analyses but can also be found in the most unlikely of places.

As we navigate through this heated discussion, it's essential to acknowledge the limitations of our study. While our findings illuminate a compelling correlation, they do not provide causative evidence. That being said, the sweltering strength of the correlation coefficient does hint at a substantial relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Perhaps we have stumbled upon the statistical equivalent of a perfect flame, where the variables burn brightly in harmony.

In closing, our research contributes to the longstanding discourse surrounding arson and flammable materials, offering a statistical flame that burns brightly amid a sea of empirical data. The coalescence of empirical evidence and occasional witticisms serves to remind us that even in the world of academic research, the occasional spark of humor can brighten the darkest of statistical corridors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Maine and Kerosene used in Turkiye. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in the state of Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. We delve into this fiery topic by analyzing data obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, covering the time period from 1985 to 2022. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly unconnected phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01.

As we set out to explore this hot topic, we couldn't help but notice the sparks of curiosity igniting within us. With this conflagration of data at our fingertips, we ventured to shed light on this incendiary relationship. It's not every day that one gets to grapple with the burning question of how arson in Maine and kerosene usage in Turkiye might be intertwined.

We navigated through the murky waters of statistical analysis, aiming to blaze a trail through the complexities of these disparate variables. Our findings left us all in a heated discussion, as we pondered the implications of this unexpected connection. While skeptics might dismiss our discoveries as mere statistical smoke and mirrors, our robust analysis kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations.

In conclusion, our research brings a new spark of insight into the world of fire-related phenomena. The flames of curiosity have been stoked, and the smoldering embers of discourse have been fanned. Who knew that the link between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye could be so hotly debated?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of the relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and laypeople alike. In the realm of arson incidents in Maine, USA, and kerosene consumption in Turkiye, this curiosity is particularly piqued. As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." And in this case, it seems there may be more to the correlation than meets the eye.
We approach this investigation with a burning desire to uncover the intricacies of this unexpected connection. It's not often that one delves into the world of arson and kerosene usage and comes out unscathed, but we are prepared to brave the flames, armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a steadfast commitment to uncovering the truth.
The sparks of curiosity that initially ignited this study have propelled us into uncharted territory, where the heat of investigation knows no bounds. Our aim is to shed light on the smoldering link between these disparate variables and illuminate the path toward a greater understanding of their interplay. As we embark on this fiery journey, we are mindful of the old adage: "Fight fire with statistics."
Drawing on data spanning nearly four decades, we set out to blaze a trail through the complexities of the relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Our findings promise to ignite a new conversation about the correlation, challenging conventional wisdom and kindling a renewed interest in the potential connections lying beneath the surface.
In the course of our investigation, we have encountered challenges that were, quite literally, of a combustible nature. However, our unwavering dedication to unraveling the mystery has led us to the doorstep of a discovery that has the potential to set the field ablaze with discussion. Our findings are sure to spark debate and stoke the flames of curiosity among researchers and enthusiasts alike.
As we set the stage for the unveiling of our research findings, it's worth remembering the timeless wisdom of fire safety: "Don't play with matches." But in the realm of academic inquiry, perhaps it's time to play with fire and see where the sparks may lead us.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed an astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 between arson incidents in Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye over the time period from 1985 to 2022. This strong positive correlation indicates that as arson incidents in Maine increased, kerosene consumption in Turkiye also showed a marked rise. The r-squared value of 0.7875670 further emphasizes the high degree of relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. The data points form a clear upward trend, visually capturing the fiery association between these two phenomena.
As we delved into the analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the irony of uncovering a scorching connection between arson and kerosene. It seems that in the world of statistical correlations, sometimes the findings can be quite "hot" indeed.
Our deep dive into the data not only revealed a compelling correlation but also sparked a newfound appreciation for the unexpected relationships that can emerge in the realm of empirical research. The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidified the statistical validity of our findings, leaving little doubt about the meaningful association between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye.
In the words of renowned firefighter and statistician, "When there's smoke, there's a p-value." While the initial combination of arson and kerosene consumption may strike one as odd, our analysis has illuminated the underlying pattern, setting the stage for further exploration of this heated correlation.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the fiery relationship between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistical analysis, one must always be prepared for unexpected flare-ups of correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a scorching connection between arson incidents in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01 leave little doubt about the fiery relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. It seems that where there's arson smoke in Maine, there's a kerosene fire in Turkiye!

Our findings have kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations, igniting a blaze of curiosity within the research community. As we embark on this fiery journey of discovery, we are reminded of the words of wisdom: "Don't burn your bridges, unless you're conducting a controlled statistical experiment."

This research not only illuminates the unexpected spark between arson and kerosene but also adds fuel to the fire of empirical inquiry. Our scatterplot visually captures the blazing association between these two phenomena, leaving little room for doubt about the heat of their relationship.

In the vein of statistical analysis, our findings serve as a reminder that in the world of research, one must always be prepared for unexpected flare-ups of correlation. It's clear that in the realm of empirical inquiry, sometimes the findings can be quite "hot" indeed – just like a well-timed dad joke.

In light of these scorching revelations, it is evident that no further research is needed in this area. Our findings not only set the field ablaze with discussion but also provide a solid foundation for future explorations of unexpected correlations. Further investigation into this flaming connection would just be adding unnecessary heat to an already fiery topic.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Fire Dynamics and Socioeconomic Patterns


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Global Arson and Fossil Fuel Consumption Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Playing with Fire: A Flammable Connection Between Arson in Maine and Kerosene consumption in Turkiye with an abstract of This research paper investigates the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in the state of Maine, USA and kerosene consumption in Turkiye. We delve into this fiery topic by analyzing data obtained from the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services and the Energy Information Administration, covering the time period from 1985 to 2022. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between these seemingly unconnected phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8874497 and a significance level of p < 0.01.
As we set out to explore this hot topic, we couldn't help but notice the sparks of curiosity igniting within us. With this conflagration of data at our fingertips, we ventured to shed light on this incendiary relationship. It's not every day that one gets to grapple with the burning question of how arson in Maine and kerosene usage in Turkiye might be intertwined.
We navigated through the murky waters of statistical analysis, aiming to blaze a trail through the complexities of these disparate variables. Our findings left us all in a heated discussion, as we pondered the implications of this unexpected connection. While skeptics might dismiss our discoveries as mere statistical smoke and mirrors, our robust analysis kindled a new understanding of the intricate web of correlations.
In conclusion, our research brings a new spark of insight into the world of fire-related phenomena. The flames of curiosity have been stoked, and the smoldering embers of discourse have been fanned. Who knew that the link between arson in Maine and kerosene consumption in Turkiye could be so hotly debated?

ChatGPT:

arson incidents Maine, kerosene consumption Turkiye, correlation fire statistics, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Energy Information Administration data, arson trend analysis, statistical correlation arson and kerosene, fire-related phenomena, impact of kerosene consumption, relationship between fire incidents

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Arson in Maine
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Maine
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Maine

Kerosene used in Turkiye
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Turkiye in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Turkiye

Correlation r = 0.8874497 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7875670 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Turkiye) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Maine) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-13. 0.0000000000001147077148181897
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 1.1E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,717,809,447,996 random variables You don't actually need 8 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Arson in Maine (Arson rate)36.733.531.725.827.527.323.62326.222.519.623.320.516.315.515.416.114.11514.39.315.218.71518.719.120.11811.67.76.916.311.58.111.413.912.311.5
Kerosene used in Turkiye (Million Barrels/Day)5.424665.268496.216445.58474.750693.923293.652063.035523.301372.350682.22742.002731.597261.684931.155220.8060110.6946110.5671231.534250.792350.6136990.5260270.9123291.122950.797261.17261.402741.032791.208220.8819671.038810.5560750.563380.3018870.397790.1994050.0479040.047904




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([36.7,33.5,31.7,25.8,27.5,27.3,23.6,23,26.2,22.5,19.6,23.3,20.5,16.3,15.5,15.4,16.1,14.1,15,14.3,9.3,15.2,18.7,15,18.7,19.1,20.1,18,11.6,7.7,6.9,16.3,11.5,8.1,11.4,13.9,12.3,11.5,])
array_2 = np.array([5.42466,5.26849,6.21644,5.5847,4.75069,3.92329,3.65206,3.03552,3.30137,2.35068,2.2274,2.00273,1.59726,1.68493,1.15522,0.806011,0.694611,0.567123,1.53425,0.79235,0.613699,0.526027,0.912329,1.12295,0.79726,1.1726,1.40274,1.03279,1.20822,0.881967,1.03881,0.556075,0.56338,0.301887,0.39779,0.199405,0.047904,0.047904,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Maine"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Turkiye"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1985 · Black Variable ID: 20046 · Red Variable ID: 25016
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0