about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,982 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the second variable is Arson in Alaska.  The chart goes from 1992 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer gas stations in Uzbekistan meant fewer opportunities for spontaneous combustion, leading to a reduction in accidental fires in Alaska. Remember, when it comes to fire safety, it's all about that global spark plug supply chain!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Image Generation Prompt: Style: A Discovery magazine cover image Description: In a remote village in Alaska, a small wooden shack is engulfed in flames, with billowing smoke rising into the sky. Nearby, an old rusted gasoline pump stands abandoned, surrounded by wild grass and wilderness. Enhanced Visual Elements: - Emphasize the glowing flames engulfing the wooden shack, with flickering light and intense heat. - Include billowing, thick smoke rising high into the sky, creating dramatic shapes and textures against the background. - Highlight the contrast between the fiery destruction of the shack and the serene, untouched wilderness surrounding it. - Add details to the abandoned gasoline pump, showcasing its rusted and weathered appearance against the natural landscape. Note: Enable the DALL·E-3 model to capture the contrast between the destructive force of fire and the resilient beauty of the Alaskan wilderness in the generated image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s A Discovery magazine cover image Magic realism A TIME magazine cover image Oragami
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a remote village in Alaska, a small wooden shack is engulfed in flames, with billowing smoke rising into the sky. Nearby, an old rusted gasoline pump stands abandoned, surrounded by wild grass and wilderness.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a remote village in Alaska, a small wooden shack is engulfed in flames, with billowing smoke rising into the sky. Nearby, an old rusted gasoline pump stands abandoned, surrounded by wild grass and wilderness. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Image Generation Prompt: Style: A Discovery magazine cover image Description: In a remote village in Alaska, a small wooden shack is engulfed in flames, with billowing smoke rising into the sky. Nearby, an old rusted gasoline pump stands abandoned, surrounded by wild grass and wilderness. Enhanced Visual Elements: - Emphasize the glowing flames engulfing the wooden shack, with flickering light and intense heat. - Include billowing, thick smoke rising high into the sky, creating dramatic shapes and textures against the background. - Highlight the contrast between the fiery destruction of the shack and the serene, untouched wilderness surrounding it. - Add details to the abandoned gasoline pump, showcasing its rusted and weathered appearance against the natural landscape. Note: Enable the DALL·E-3 model to capture the contrast between the destructive force of fire and the resilient beauty of the Alaskan wilderness in the generated image.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan caused Arson in Alaska to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska

The Journal of Transcontinental Combustion Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 for 1992 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska over the course of nearly three decades. Through the meticulous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have uncovered a striking relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 from 1992 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a bizarre, yet statistically significant, association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. We explore potential explanations for this peculiar link, encompassing factors such as market dynamics, climate, and human behavior, while also considering the likelihood of spurious correlations. The implications of our research are as intriguing as they are unexpected, offering both a conundrum and a chuckle to the academic community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska over the course of nearly three decades. Through the meticulous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have uncovered a striking relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 from 1992 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a bizarre, yet statistically significant, association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. We explore potential explanations for this peculiar link, encompassing factors such as market dynamics, climate, and human behavior, while also considering the likelihood of spurious correlations. The implications of our research are as intriguing as they are unexpected, offering both a conundrum and a chuckle to the academic community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of research, as in life, there are always surprises waiting around the corner. Sometimes these surprises are as small as discovering your pen behind your ear, and other times they are as big as uncovering a perplexing correlation between two seemingly unrelated variables. Today, we delve into the latter as we explore the curious connection between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska.

While one might expect the connection between gasoline and fire to be obvious, the specific link we are investigating in this study has a twist as unexpected as finding a banana in the fruit bowl at a gas station. Our initial hypothesis was as unremarkable as a cup of lukewarm coffee in a research office filled with enthusiastic post-docs: there would be no direct relationship between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson incidents in Alaska. However, as with many academic endeavors, the journey from hypothesis to conclusion was filled with surprises and unexpected turns, much like trying to navigate through a corn maze during an unexpected thunderstorm.

Thanks to the wonders of modern data collection and analysis, we were able to unmask a bizarre relationship with a correlation coefficient that would make statisticians do a double-take. The thrill of uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1992 to 2021 was akin to stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in a grassy field. It left us scratching our heads and pondering the possible implications of this finding like a cat trying to figure out the purpose of a cucumber strategically placed behind it.

As we venture further into this research, we will explore potential contributing factors such as market dynamics, climate variations, and the impact of human behavior—each subject more intriguing than a mystery novel set in an ice cream parlor. We will also confront the possibility of spurious correlations, to ensure that our findings are as solid as a brick wall in a game of Jenga.

This study not only presents an intellectual conundrum for the academic community but also offers a source of amusement, much like finding a clown at a somber funeral. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in unpacking this unexpected and whimsical correlation that seems to tie gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan to arson in Alaska. The findings promise to be as captivating as a magic show at a science conference, leaving both researchers and readers with more questions and, quite possibly, a smile.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska over the course of nearly three decades. Through the meticulous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have uncovered a striking relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 from 1992 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a bizarre, yet statistically significant, association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. We explore potential explanations for this peculiar link, encompassing factors such as market dynamics, climate, and human behavior, while also considering the likelihood of spurious correlations. The implications of our research are as intriguing as they are unexpected, offering both a conundrum and a chuckle to the academic community.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of research, as in life, there are always surprises waiting around the corner. Sometimes these surprises are as small as discovering your pen behind your ear, and other times they are as big as uncovering a perplexing correlation between two seemingly unrelated variables. Today, we delve into the latter as we explore the curious connection between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska.
While one might expect the connection between gasoline and fire to be obvious, the specific link we are investigating in this study has a twist as unexpected as finding a banana in the fruit bowl at a gas station. Our initial hypothesis was as unremarkable as a cup of lukewarm coffee in a research office filled with enthusiastic post-docs: there would be no direct relationship between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson incidents in Alaska. However, as with many academic endeavors, the journey from hypothesis to conclusion was filled with surprises and unexpected turns, much like trying to navigate through a corn maze during an unexpected thunderstorm.
Thanks to the wonders of modern data collection and analysis, we were able to unmask a bizarre relationship with a correlation coefficient that would make statisticians do a double-take. The thrill of uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1992 to 2021 was akin to stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in a grassy field. It left us scratching our heads and pondering the possible implications of this finding like a cat trying to figure out the purpose of a cucumber strategically placed behind it.
As we venture further into this research, we will explore potential contributing factors such as market dynamics, climate variations, and the impact of human behavior—each subject more intriguing than a mystery novel set in an ice cream parlor. We will also confront the possibility of spurious correlations, to ensure that our findings are as solid as a brick wall in a game of Jenga.
This study not only presents an intellectual conundrum for the academic community but also offers a source of amusement, much like finding a clown at a somber funeral. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in unpacking this unexpected and whimsical correlation that seems to tie gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan to arson in Alaska. The findings promise to be as captivating as a magic show at a science conference, leaving both researchers and readers with more questions and, quite possibly, a smile.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A number of studies have delved into the complex relationship between environmental factors and criminal behavior, but few have ventured into the peculiar realm of gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and its potential connection to arson in Alaska. Smith et al. (2015) investigated the impact of fuel consumption on regional crime rates, finding correlations between petroleum usage and various criminal activities. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the societal implications of gasoline consumption in Central Asia, but surprisingly omitted any mention of its potential influence on fire-related incidents in remote U.S. states.

Turning to relevant non-fiction literature, "The Burning Question: We Can't Burn Half the World's Oil, Coal, and Gas. So How Do We Quit?" by David and Elizabeth Solecki examines the global challenges associated with fossil fuel consumption, though regrettably it overlooks the specific link between gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska. On a more speculative note, "Firestarter" by Stephen King and "Where There's Smoke: A Short Story Collection" by Jodi Picoult offer thrilling narratives centered around fire and its destructive power, yet fails to address the unexpected connection we are exploring in this research.

Venturing further into the depths of literature, the authors also consulted "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Arson" as well as "101 Unusual Uses for Gasoline," hoping to stumble upon unorthodox insights that may have eluded more conventional sources. Additionally, the popular "Shampoo Bottle: A Comprehensive Reference Guide" was perused, yielding curious, albeit irrelevant, information about the composition and application of shower products.

In light of these varied findings, it becomes evident that the distinct correlation between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska exists within a realm largely unexplored by existing research and literature. This highlights the novelty of our investigation and underscores the importance of our pursuit in unraveling this bizarre, yet statistically significant, association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1992 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska over the course of nearly three decades. Through the meticulous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have uncovered a striking relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 from 1992 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a bizarre, yet statistically significant, association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. We explore potential explanations for this peculiar link, encompassing factors such as market dynamics, climate, and human behavior, while also considering the likelihood of spurious correlations. The implications of our research are as intriguing as they are unexpected, offering both a conundrum and a chuckle to the academic community.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of research, as in life, there are always surprises waiting around the corner. Sometimes these surprises are as small as discovering your pen behind your ear, and other times they are as big as uncovering a perplexing correlation between two seemingly unrelated variables. Today, we delve into the latter as we explore the curious connection between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska.
While one might expect the connection between gasoline and fire to be obvious, the specific link we are investigating in this study has a twist as unexpected as finding a banana in the fruit bowl at a gas station. Our initial hypothesis was as unremarkable as a cup of lukewarm coffee in a research office filled with enthusiastic post-docs: there would be no direct relationship between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson incidents in Alaska. However, as with many academic endeavors, the journey from hypothesis to conclusion was filled with surprises and unexpected turns, much like trying to navigate through a corn maze during an unexpected thunderstorm.
Thanks to the wonders of modern data collection and analysis, we were able to unmask a bizarre relationship with a correlation coefficient that would make statisticians do a double-take. The thrill of uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1992 to 2021 was akin to stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in a grassy field. It left us scratching our heads and pondering the possible implications of this finding like a cat trying to figure out the purpose of a cucumber strategically placed behind it.
As we venture further into this research, we will explore potential contributing factors such as market dynamics, climate variations, and the impact of human behavior—each subject more intriguing than a mystery novel set in an ice cream parlor. We will also confront the possibility of spurious correlations, to ensure that our findings are as solid as a brick wall in a game of Jenga.
This study not only presents an intellectual conundrum for the academic community but also offers a source of amusement, much like finding a clown at a somber funeral. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in unpacking this unexpected and whimsical correlation that seems to tie gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan to arson in Alaska. The findings promise to be as captivating as a magic show at a science conference, leaving both researchers and readers with more questions and, quite possibly, a smile.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to unravel the mysterious connection between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson incidents in Alaska, our research team employed a combination of statistical analysis, geographical mapping, and a touch of investigative sleuthing. Our approach was as diverse as a buffet line at a culinary conference, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods to scrutinize the data from 1992 to 2021.

To begin, we carefully sourced data on gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan from the Energy Information Administration, feeling quite like treasure hunters unearthing valuable artifacts from the depths of the internet. Likewise, we harvested information on arson incidents in Alaska from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, navigating the labyrinthine corridors of digital databases with the nimbleness of a cat burglar evading security systems.

Once armed with this treasure trove of data, we delved into the statistical analysis with the fervor of a chef experimenting with a new recipe. Utilizing correlation analysis, we set out to quantify the relationship between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and the occurrence of arson in Alaska. Our calculations were as precise as a surgeon's scalpel, yielding a correlation coefficient that raised eyebrows and sparked our intellectual curiosity like a fireworks display on a starry night.

In addition to our statistical approach, we employed geographical mapping techniques to visually uncover potential geographic patterns or anomalies that may provide insight into the enigmatic link between these two disparate variables. This mapping process was akin to embarking on a cartographic expedition, as we navigated through charts, graphs, and geographic information systems to plot the geographical distribution of gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson incidents in Alaska.

Furthermore, our methodology involved delving into historical and contextual factors, as we sought to understand the broader socio-economic, environmental, and cultural contexts that may underlie this unconventional relationship. We perused historical records, market dynamics, and climate variations with the enthusiasm of amateur historians exploring a dusty attic, seeking clues that could resolve the tantalizing mystery of the gasoline-arson nexus.

It is important to note that our research methodology diligently accounted for potential confounding variables and spurious correlations, ensuring that our findings are as robust as a sturdy bridge in a game of limbo. Additionally, we employed a dash of creative thinking and humor, recognizing that even the most serious academic pursuit can benefit from a pinch of levity and a sprinkle of playfulness.

Undoubtedly, our journey through this methodological maze was as exhilarating as a rollercoaster ride at a research-themed amusement park. And while the path may have been unconventional, the insights we gained from this multidimensional approach provide a compelling foundation for our unexpected yet intriguing findings. As we embark on the next phase of our analysis, the excitement is palpable, and we invite our fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the captivating conundrum of gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1992 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7889901, r-squared of 0.6225055, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska over the course of nearly three decades. Through the meticulous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have uncovered a striking relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 from 1992 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a bizarre, yet statistically significant, association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. We explore potential explanations for this peculiar link, encompassing factors such as market dynamics, climate, and human behavior, while also considering the likelihood of spurious correlations. The implications of our research are as intriguing as they are unexpected, offering both a conundrum and a chuckle to the academic community.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of research, as in life, there are always surprises waiting around the corner. Sometimes these surprises are as small as discovering your pen behind your ear, and other times they are as big as uncovering a perplexing correlation between two seemingly unrelated variables. Today, we delve into the latter as we explore the curious connection between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska.
While one might expect the connection between gasoline and fire to be obvious, the specific link we are investigating in this study has a twist as unexpected as finding a banana in the fruit bowl at a gas station. Our initial hypothesis was as unremarkable as a cup of lukewarm coffee in a research office filled with enthusiastic post-docs: there would be no direct relationship between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson incidents in Alaska. However, as with many academic endeavors, the journey from hypothesis to conclusion was filled with surprises and unexpected turns, much like trying to navigate through a corn maze during an unexpected thunderstorm.
Thanks to the wonders of modern data collection and analysis, we were able to unmask a bizarre relationship with a correlation coefficient that would make statisticians do a double-take. The thrill of uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1992 to 2021 was akin to stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in a grassy field. It left us scratching our heads and pondering the possible implications of this finding like a cat trying to figure out the purpose of a cucumber strategically placed behind it.
As we venture further into this research, we will explore potential contributing factors such as market dynamics, climate variations, and the impact of human behavior—each subject more intriguing than a mystery novel set in an ice cream parlor. We will also confront the possibility of spurious correlations, to ensure that our findings are as solid as a brick wall in a game of Jenga.
This study not only presents an intellectual conundrum for the academic community but also offers a source of amusement, much like finding a clown at a somber funeral. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in unpacking this unexpected and whimsical correlation that seems to tie gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan to arson in Alaska. The findings promise to be as captivating as a magic show at a science conference, leaving both researchers and readers with more questions and, quite possibly, a smile.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a striking correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska from 1992 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and an r-squared value of 0.6225055 left us feeling as surprised as a magician who actually pulls a rabbit out of a hat. The p-value being less than 0.01 added a dash of statistical spice to our findings, making our discovery as significant as finding a needle in a haystack.

Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables, akin to a polar bear frolicking in a snow-covered field. This surprising connection challenges traditional assumptions and offers a new perspective on the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena, much like finding a pineapple on a pizza.

The unexpected nature of this association opens up a Pandora's box of potential explanations and implications. Factors such as market dynamics, climate patterns, and human behavior could all play a role in this quirky relationship, making our research as much of a head-scratcher as a cat chasing its own tail. We also acknowledge the possibility of spurious correlations and have taken measures to ensure the validity and reliability of our findings, akin to a juggler carefully maintaining the balance of his spinning plates.

The implications of these findings are as compelling as a mystery novel with a cliffhanger ending. This peculiar link between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska not only presents an intellectual conundrum but also offers a source of amusement, akin to finding a hidden message in a crossword puzzle. Our research promises to engender further inquiry and contemplation, leaving both the academic community and readers with an inquisitive grin and, quite possibly, an urge to reevaluate their assumptions about seemingly unrelated phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska over the course of nearly three decades. Through the meticulous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have uncovered a striking relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 from 1992 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a bizarre, yet statistically significant, association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. We explore potential explanations for this peculiar link, encompassing factors such as market dynamics, climate, and human behavior, while also considering the likelihood of spurious correlations. The implications of our research are as intriguing as they are unexpected, offering both a conundrum and a chuckle to the academic community.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A number of studies have delved into the complex relationship between environmental factors and criminal behavior, but few have ventured into the peculiar realm of gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and its potential connection to arson in Alaska. Smith et al. (2015) investigated the impact of fuel consumption on regional crime rates, finding correlations between petroleum usage and various criminal activities. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) explored the societal implications of gasoline consumption in Central Asia, but surprisingly omitted any mention of its potential influence on fire-related incidents in remote U.S. states.
Turning to relevant non-fiction literature, "The Burning Question: We Can't Burn Half the World's Oil, Coal, and Gas. So How Do We Quit?" by David and Elizabeth Solecki examines the global challenges associated with fossil fuel consumption, though regrettably it overlooks the specific link between gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska. On a more speculative note, "Firestarter" by Stephen King and "Where There's Smoke: A Short Story Collection" by Jodi Picoult offer thrilling narratives centered around fire and its destructive power, yet fails to address the unexpected connection we are exploring in this research.
Venturing further into the depths of literature, the authors also consulted "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Arson" as well as "101 Unusual Uses for Gasoline," hoping to stumble upon unorthodox insights that may have eluded more conventional sources. Additionally, the popular "Shampoo Bottle: A Comprehensive Reference Guide" was perused, yielding curious, albeit irrelevant, information about the composition and application of shower products.
In light of these varied findings, it becomes evident that the distinct correlation between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska exists within a realm largely unexplored by existing research and literature. This highlights the novelty of our investigation and underscores the importance of our pursuit in unraveling this bizarre, yet statistically significant, association.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a striking correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska from 1992 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and an r-squared value of 0.6225055 left us feeling as surprised as a magician who actually pulls a rabbit out of a hat. The p-value being less than 0.01 added a dash of statistical spice to our findings, making our discovery as significant as finding a needle in a haystack.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables, akin to a polar bear frolicking in a snow-covered field. This surprising connection challenges traditional assumptions and offers a new perspective on the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena, much like finding a pineapple on a pizza.
The unexpected nature of this association opens up a Pandora's box of potential explanations and implications. Factors such as market dynamics, climate patterns, and human behavior could all play a role in this quirky relationship, making our research as much of a head-scratcher as a cat chasing its own tail. We also acknowledge the possibility of spurious correlations and have taken measures to ensure the validity and reliability of our findings, akin to a juggler carefully maintaining the balance of his spinning plates.
The implications of these findings are as compelling as a mystery novel with a cliffhanger ending. This peculiar link between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska not only presents an intellectual conundrum but also offers a source of amusement, akin to finding a hidden message in a crossword puzzle. Our research promises to engender further inquiry and contemplation, leaving both the academic community and readers with an inquisitive grin and, quite possibly, an urge to reevaluate their assumptions about seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our research have led us down a winding road, much like a lost traveler stumbling upon a peculiar sight. The robust correlation between gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska supports the notion that there might be more to this enigmatic connection than meets the eye. We find ourselves echoing the sentiments of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who hinted at the potential influence of fuel consumption on criminal activities. It seems their subtle allusions to our seemingly far-fetched hypothesis were not as far-fetched as we initially assumed.

Reflecting on our literature review, the lack of attention to our specific connection appears to be as glaringly obvious as a zebra in a snowstorm. Our own expedition into non-fiction, speculative, and at times irrelevant literature has only reinforced the unforeseen relevance of our findings. Who would have thought that "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Arson" and "101 Unusual Uses for Gasoline" would hold hidden clues to our research?

In light of our results, it is clear that the unexpected association between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska is more than a shot in the dark. The statistical significance, akin to a sunbeam piercing through stormy clouds, indicates that there might be fire where there's smoke.

Our research delves into uncharted territories, much like an explorer voyaging into the unknown. The implications of our findings have turned out to be as compelling and unexpected as a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat during a tax audit. This quizzical connection not only poses an intellectual conundrum but also offers a source of amusement amidst the often serious landscape of academic inquiries.

As we tread further into this unexplored territory, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling this peculiar association. The conundrum, chuckles, and hidden surprises within our findings are sure to spark further curiosity and, perhaps, a few more unexpected connections in the world of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska over the course of nearly three decades. Through the meticulous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have uncovered a striking relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 from 1992 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a bizarre, yet statistically significant, association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. We explore potential explanations for this peculiar link, encompassing factors such as market dynamics, climate, and human behavior, while also considering the likelihood of spurious correlations. The implications of our research are as intriguing as they are unexpected, offering both a conundrum and a chuckle to the academic community.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of research, as in life, there are always surprises waiting around the corner. Sometimes these surprises are as small as discovering your pen behind your ear, and other times they are as big as uncovering a perplexing correlation between two seemingly unrelated variables. Today, we delve into the latter as we explore the curious connection between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska.
While one might expect the connection between gasoline and fire to be obvious, the specific link we are investigating in this study has a twist as unexpected as finding a banana in the fruit bowl at a gas station. Our initial hypothesis was as unremarkable as a cup of lukewarm coffee in a research office filled with enthusiastic post-docs: there would be no direct relationship between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson incidents in Alaska. However, as with many academic endeavors, the journey from hypothesis to conclusion was filled with surprises and unexpected turns, much like trying to navigate through a corn maze during an unexpected thunderstorm.
Thanks to the wonders of modern data collection and analysis, we were able to unmask a bizarre relationship with a correlation coefficient that would make statisticians do a double-take. The thrill of uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and a p-value less than 0.01 from 1992 to 2021 was akin to stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in a grassy field. It left us scratching our heads and pondering the possible implications of this finding like a cat trying to figure out the purpose of a cucumber strategically placed behind it.
As we venture further into this research, we will explore potential contributing factors such as market dynamics, climate variations, and the impact of human behavior—each subject more intriguing than a mystery novel set in an ice cream parlor. We will also confront the possibility of spurious correlations, to ensure that our findings are as solid as a brick wall in a game of Jenga.
This study not only presents an intellectual conundrum for the academic community but also offers a source of amusement, much like finding a clown at a somber funeral. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite our readers to join us in unpacking this unexpected and whimsical correlation that seems to tie gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan to arson in Alaska. The findings promise to be as captivating as a magic show at a science conference, leaving both researchers and readers with more questions and, quite possibly, a smile.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a striking correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska from 1992 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and an r-squared value of 0.6225055 left us feeling as surprised as a magician who actually pulls a rabbit out of a hat. The p-value being less than 0.01 added a dash of statistical spice to our findings, making our discovery as significant as finding a needle in a haystack.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables, akin to a polar bear frolicking in a snow-covered field. This surprising connection challenges traditional assumptions and offers a new perspective on the interplay of seemingly unrelated phenomena, much like finding a pineapple on a pizza.
The unexpected nature of this association opens up a Pandora's box of potential explanations and implications. Factors such as market dynamics, climate patterns, and human behavior could all play a role in this quirky relationship, making our research as much of a head-scratcher as a cat chasing its own tail. We also acknowledge the possibility of spurious correlations and have taken measures to ensure the validity and reliability of our findings, akin to a juggler carefully maintaining the balance of his spinning plates.
The implications of these findings are as compelling as a mystery novel with a cliffhanger ending. This peculiar link between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska not only presents an intellectual conundrum but also offers a source of amusement, akin to finding a hidden message in a crossword puzzle. Our research promises to engender further inquiry and contemplation, leaving both the academic community and readers with an inquisitive grin and, quite possibly, an urge to reevaluate their assumptions about seemingly unrelated phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a rather unexpected and statistically significant correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska from 1992 to 2021. This discovery is as surprising as realizing that the only thing in Area 51 is just a collection of alien-themed novelty items. The correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and the p-value less than 0.01 have raised eyebrows in the academic community, not unlike discovering that the tooth fairy has been investing in the stock market.

Our findings prompt us to consider potential contributing factors, akin to trying to figure out why anyone would willingly eat a raw onion like an apple. Market dynamics, climate variations, and human behavior all offer intriguing avenues for further exploration, much like pondering the motive behind placing a "Wet Floor" sign in the middle of a desert. We have also been cautious in considering the possibility of spurious correlations, ensuring that our conclusions are as solid as a rock in a literal sense.

This research offers not only a perplexing conundrum but also an element of amusement, like finding a one-dollar bill in a birthday card from a distant relative. As we wrap up this investigation, we must assert that there may not be a need for further exploration of this peculiar link. As unlikely as it seems, the quirky association between gasoline consumption in Uzbekistan and arson in Alaska has provided both an intellectual puzzle and a source of lightheartedness, beckoning the academic community to embrace the unexpected and quirky in the vast world of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transcontinental Combustion Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Unconventional Correlation Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling Fire: The Unlikely Link Between Gasoline Pumped in Uzbekistan and Arson in Alaska with an abstract of This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected correlation between the amount of gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan and the incidence of arson in Alaska over the course of nearly three decades. Through the meticulous analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we have uncovered a striking relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.7889901 and p < 0.01 from 1992 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a bizarre, yet statistically significant, association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. We explore potential explanations for this peculiar link, encompassing factors such as market dynamics, climate, and human behavior, while also considering the likelihood of spurious correlations. The implications of our research are as intriguing as they are unexpected, offering both a conundrum and a chuckle to the academic community.

ChatGPT:

Uzbekistan gasoline consumption, Alaska arson rates, correlation gasoline consumption and arson, Energy Information Administration data, FBI crime statistics, gasoline consumption trends, arson statistics, spurious correlations in research, market dynamics impact on crime, climate impact on arson, human behavior and arson, statistical significance in correlations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in Uzbekistan in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan

Arson in Alaska
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Alaska
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Alaska

Correlation r = 0.7889901 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6225055 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 62.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Alaska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan) over the 30 years from 1992 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.2E-7. 0.0000002216980895449486400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.79 in 2.2E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,510,639 random variables You don't actually need 4 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 29 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 29 because we have two variables measured over a period of 30 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.6, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan (Million Barrels/Day)484544432731323738.92138.431637.732441.111831.230131.905931.230132.22733.560737.08833.021629.913428.043825.286223.81392526252525.052523.790523.7905
Arson in Alaska (Arson rate)33.736.245.439.229.528.62929.232.235.538.238.927.4243338.524.327.224.930.725.620.919.724.719.418.817.328.419.48.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([48,45,44,43,27,31,32,37,38.921,38.4316,37.7324,41.1118,31.2301,31.9059,31.2301,32.227,33.5607,37.088,33.0216,29.9134,28.0438,25.2862,23.8139,25,26,25,25,25.0525,23.7905,23.7905,])
array_2 = np.array([33.7,36.2,45.4,39.2,29.5,28.6,29,29.2,32.2,35.5,38.2,38.9,27.4,24,33,38.5,24.3,27.2,24.9,30.7,25.6,20.9,19.7,24.7,19.4,18.8,17.3,28.4,19.4,8.9,])
array_1_name = "Gasoline pumped in Uzbekistan"
array_2_name = "Arson in Alaska"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 1982 · Black Variable ID: 25061 · Red Variable ID: 20037
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0