about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,967 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'elon musk' and the second variable is Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS).  The chart goes from 2010 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Elon Musk Google searches skyrocketed, internet traffic surged. This increase in web activity led to a higher demand for internet bandwidth, causing a strain on existing infrastructure. To keep up with this unexpected spike, telecommunication companies had to invest heavily in expanding their networks. This sudden boost in infrastructure spending caught the attention of investors, who saw potential for growth in the sector. With a newfound focus on telecommunications, Morgan Stanley's stock price experienced a stellar rise as it was seen as a key player in facilitating the needed financial transactions for these network expansions.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover with the iconic red border and text layout. In the center of the cover, a person is sitting at a desk with a laptop open. The laptop's screen displays a Google search bar with "Elon Musk" typed in. In the background, the laptop screen also shows a stock market chart depicting Morgan Stanley's stock price. The person's hand is positioned on the keyboard as if they are typing, with their face partially visible in concentration. The setting should have a neutral, professional ambiance reminiscent of a newsroom or office space. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal a Polaroid photo An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Woodblock painting A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a person is typing "Elon Musk" into the Google search bar on their laptop, while a stock market chart showing Morgan Stanley's stock price is displayed on the screen in the background.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a person is typing "Elon Musk" into the Google search bar on their laptop, while a stock market chart showing Morgan Stanley's stock price is displayed on the screen in the background. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover with the iconic red border and text layout. In the center of the cover, a person is sitting at a desk with a laptop open. The laptop's screen displays a Google search bar with "Elon Musk" typed in. In the background, the laptop screen also shows a stock market chart depicting Morgan Stanley's stock price. The person's hand is positioned on the keyboard as if they are typing, with their face partially visible in concentration. The setting should have a neutral, professional ambiance reminiscent of a newsroom or office space.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in elon musk (Google searches for 'elon musk') caused Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS) to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price

The Journal of Speculative Finance and Technology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employ statistical methods to quantify the potential impact of public interest in Elon Musk on the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong and noteworthy association between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur and the fluctuations in Morgan Stanley's stock price. Our study sheds light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, uncovering an unexpected link that elicits further inquiries into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its influence on stock performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employ statistical methods to quantify the potential impact of public interest in Elon Musk on the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong and noteworthy association between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur and the fluctuations in Morgan Stanley's stock price. Our study sheds light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, uncovering an unexpected link that elicits further inquiries into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its influence on stock performance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**INTRODUCTION**

The world of finance and the labyrinth of the internet are two distinct realms, each with its own enigmatic nature and unpredictable patterns. While the former is governed by intricate financial models and market dynamics, the latter is an ever-evolving digital landscape brimming with memes, cat videos, and, of course, relentless fascination with certain public figures. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the connection—seemingly as preposterous as a conspiracy theory in a blockbuster movie—between the Google searches for the one and only Elon Musk and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS). As we delve into this rather peculiar investigation, we aim to shed light on the uncharted territory where internet intrigue intersects with the intricate dance of stock market fluctuations.

The maverick entrepreneur, real-life Tony Stark, or simply "the guy who wants to colonize Mars" (take your pick)—Elon Musk has become an icon of our digital age. Whether it's his ambitious ventures in space exploration, electrifying transportation, or cryptic tweets that send the internet into a frenzy, Musk's presence permeates the online realm with unwavering curiosity. However, what may appear to be mere internet chatter and the occasional meme about flamethrowers may hold a surprising influence on the financial performance of Morgan Stanley, a stalwart institution in the world of investment banking.

This study seeks to quench the thirst for understanding the elusive and, dare we say, electrifying link between public interest in Elon Musk, as reflected in Google search trends, and the stock price movements of Morgan Stanley. Our analysis spans a timeframe from 2010 to 2023, harnessing the formidable power of data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover the tantalizing correlations, or perhaps even causations, between the two seemingly disparate domains. The sheer audacity of this inquiry may prompt skepticism, amusement, or perhaps even a raised eyebrow, but we venture forth with unwavering academic rigor in pursuit of truth, no matter how peculiar it may seem.

As we venture into this uncharted intersection of internet fascination and financial market dynamics, we invite the reader to suspend disbelief and join us in an expedition that promises to unravel an unexpected link that may challenge conventional wisdom. We acknowledge that this path less traveled may be fraught with skepticism and raised eyebrows, but to quote the illustrious Mr. Musk himself, "You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great...and that's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and thinking that the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than going out there and being among the stars."

There you go! I hope this paper brings some levity to the academic scene with its unabashed humor and playfulness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employ statistical methods to quantify the potential impact of public interest in Elon Musk on the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong and noteworthy association between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur and the fluctuations in Morgan Stanley's stock price. Our study sheds light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, uncovering an unexpected link that elicits further inquiries into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its influence on stock performance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance and the labyrinth of the internet are two distinct realms, each with its own enigmatic nature and unpredictable patterns. While the former is governed by intricate financial models and market dynamics, the latter is an ever-evolving digital landscape brimming with memes, cat videos, and, of course, relentless fascination with certain public figures. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the connection—seemingly as preposterous as a conspiracy theory in a blockbuster movie—between the Google searches for the one and only Elon Musk and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS). As we delve into this rather peculiar investigation, we aim to shed light on the uncharted territory where internet intrigue intersects with the intricate dance of stock market fluctuations.
The maverick entrepreneur, real-life Tony Stark, or simply "the guy who wants to colonize Mars" (take your pick)—Elon Musk has become an icon of our digital age. Whether it's his ambitious ventures in space exploration, electrifying transportation, or cryptic tweets that send the internet into a frenzy, Musk's presence permeates the online realm with unwavering curiosity. However, what may appear to be mere internet chatter and the occasional meme about flamethrowers may hold a surprising influence on the financial performance of Morgan Stanley, a stalwart institution in the world of investment banking.
This study seeks to quench the thirst for understanding the elusive and, dare we say, electrifying link between public interest in Elon Musk, as reflected in Google search trends, and the stock price movements of Morgan Stanley. Our analysis spans a timeframe from 2010 to 2023, harnessing the formidable power of data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover the tantalizing correlations, or perhaps even causations, between the two seemingly disparate domains. The sheer audacity of this inquiry may prompt skepticism, amusement, or perhaps even a raised eyebrow, but we venture forth with unwavering academic rigor in pursuit of truth, no matter how peculiar it may seem.
As we venture into this uncharted intersection of internet fascination and financial market dynamics, we invite the reader to suspend disbelief and join us in an expedition that promises to unravel an unexpected link that may challenge conventional wisdom. We acknowledge that this path less traveled may be fraught with skepticism and raised eyebrows, but to quote the illustrious Mr. Musk himself, "You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great...and that's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and thinking that the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than going out there and being among the stars."

There you go! I hope this paper brings some levity to the academic scene with its unabashed humor and playfulness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the fascinating relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) has sparked curiosity and debate among researchers and enthusiasts alike. This curious juxtaposition of internet curiosity and financial market movements has captured the imagination of academics, prompting a search for understanding in the unlikeliest of places. In "Mind and Money: The Intersection of Online Behavior and Stock Performance," Smith and Doe delve into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its potential impact on stock performance, setting the stage for our own investigation into the captivating correlation between public interest in the enigmatic entrepreneur and the financial fortunes of Morgan Stanley.

Jones et al. further stoke our curiosity in "Digital Echoes: Unearthing the Subtle Ripples of Internet Intrigue," as they shed light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, unveiling an unexpected link that propels our inquiry forward.

As we turn to the non-fiction works, "The Age of Google" by Dikat and "Big Stock, Little Search: An Unorthodox Confusion" by Overstock, we encounter a wealth of knowledge and insight into the transformative power of the internet and its intersection with the hallowed halls of finance. These works serve as beacons of knowledge in a sea of speculation, guiding us through the tumultuous waters of digital fascination and market dynamics.

Departing from the realm of non-fiction, we draw inspiration from fictional works that offer a whimsical and thought-provoking take on the enigmatic connection we seek to unravel. "The Electric Stock Market" by A. Random Author and "Memeonomics: A Tale of Internet and Investments" by Punny McPunface offer playful yet poignant reflections on the intersection of online intrigue and financial performance, infusing our academic journey with a dash of levity and imagination.

In a quest for a different perspective, we turn to cinematic experiences that, though tangentially related, offer an opportunity for introspection and, dare I say, entertainment. "The Social Network" and "The Wolf of Wall Street" allow us to peer into the tumultuous world of digital innovation and financial machinations, offering valuable insights disguised within the glamorous façade of Hollywood storytelling.

As we traverse the landscape of literature and media, these diverse sources serve as guideposts in our pursuit to unravel the extraordinary connection between the digital footprints of Elon Musk enthusiasts and the ebb and flow of Morgan Stanley's stock price.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2010 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employ statistical methods to quantify the potential impact of public interest in Elon Musk on the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong and noteworthy association between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur and the fluctuations in Morgan Stanley's stock price. Our study sheds light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, uncovering an unexpected link that elicits further inquiries into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its influence on stock performance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance and the labyrinth of the internet are two distinct realms, each with its own enigmatic nature and unpredictable patterns. While the former is governed by intricate financial models and market dynamics, the latter is an ever-evolving digital landscape brimming with memes, cat videos, and, of course, relentless fascination with certain public figures. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the connection—seemingly as preposterous as a conspiracy theory in a blockbuster movie—between the Google searches for the one and only Elon Musk and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS). As we delve into this rather peculiar investigation, we aim to shed light on the uncharted territory where internet intrigue intersects with the intricate dance of stock market fluctuations.
The maverick entrepreneur, real-life Tony Stark, or simply "the guy who wants to colonize Mars" (take your pick)—Elon Musk has become an icon of our digital age. Whether it's his ambitious ventures in space exploration, electrifying transportation, or cryptic tweets that send the internet into a frenzy, Musk's presence permeates the online realm with unwavering curiosity. However, what may appear to be mere internet chatter and the occasional meme about flamethrowers may hold a surprising influence on the financial performance of Morgan Stanley, a stalwart institution in the world of investment banking.
This study seeks to quench the thirst for understanding the elusive and, dare we say, electrifying link between public interest in Elon Musk, as reflected in Google search trends, and the stock price movements of Morgan Stanley. Our analysis spans a timeframe from 2010 to 2023, harnessing the formidable power of data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover the tantalizing correlations, or perhaps even causations, between the two seemingly disparate domains. The sheer audacity of this inquiry may prompt skepticism, amusement, or perhaps even a raised eyebrow, but we venture forth with unwavering academic rigor in pursuit of truth, no matter how peculiar it may seem.
As we venture into this uncharted intersection of internet fascination and financial market dynamics, we invite the reader to suspend disbelief and join us in an expedition that promises to unravel an unexpected link that may challenge conventional wisdom. We acknowledge that this path less traveled may be fraught with skepticism and raised eyebrows, but to quote the illustrious Mr. Musk himself, "You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great...and that's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and thinking that the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than going out there and being among the stars."

There you go! I hope this paper brings some levity to the academic scene with its unabashed humor and playfulness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the perplexing dance between Google searches for the polymathic technologist Elon Musk and the gyrations of Morgan Stanley's stock price, our research team embarked on a methodological odyssey, weaving through data sources and statistical analyses like intrepid adventurers in the tangled jungle of information. Our approach, akin to finding a needle in a haystack as tall as Musk's ambitions, involved a series of steps detailed below:

1. Data Collection:
First, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet for data, digging through the digital debris like enthusiastic treasure hunters in a virtual shipwreck. The treasure, in this case, consisted of Google search trends for the term "Elon Musk" and the historical stock price movements of Morgan Stanley (MS) from the year 2010 to 2023. We primarily relied on data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), sifting through the virtual soil for golden nuggets of information.

2. Quantifying Public Interest in Elon Musk:
Utilizing the prowess of Google Trends, we harnessed the algorithmic sorcery to quantify the tumultuous waves of internet intrigue surrounding Elon Musk. This involved deciphering the search interest over time, mapping out the peaks and valleys of fascination like cartographers charting uncharted territories.

3. Unraveling Stock Price Movements:
Turning our gaze to the financial realm, we delved into the labyrinthine corridors of historical stock prices for Morgan Stanley (MS). With data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we meticulously traced the undulating patterns of stock price movements, striving to uncover the rhythm and tempo of market dynamics.

4. Statistical Sorcery:
Armed with our troves of data, we summoned the arcane powers of statistical analysis to unveil the hidden connections between the two seemingly disparate domains. Employing sophisticated methods such as correlation analysis, we aimed to quantify the potential impact of public fascination with Elon Musk on the stock price performances of Morgan Stanley.

5. Interpretation and Cautionary Tales:
As we emerged from the depths of data analysis, we cautiously interpreted the findings, much like explorers returning from foreign lands with tales of wonder and cautionary whispers. We acknowledged the inherent complexities and potential confounding factors, all the while proceeding with the measured tread of academic rigor.

Throughout this methodological escapade, we endeavored to strike a balance between robust analysis and a sense of whimsy, recognizing that the pursuit of knowledge need not always be shrouded in solemnity. We invite the reader to join us on this exhilarating journey through the tangled thickets of data and statistical enchantment, where even the staunchest academic must venture with a glint of curiosity in their eyes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2010 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9497254, r-squared of 0.9019783, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employ statistical methods to quantify the potential impact of public interest in Elon Musk on the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong and noteworthy association between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur and the fluctuations in Morgan Stanley's stock price. Our study sheds light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, uncovering an unexpected link that elicits further inquiries into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its influence on stock performance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of finance and the labyrinth of the internet are two distinct realms, each with its own enigmatic nature and unpredictable patterns. While the former is governed by intricate financial models and market dynamics, the latter is an ever-evolving digital landscape brimming with memes, cat videos, and, of course, relentless fascination with certain public figures. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the connection—seemingly as preposterous as a conspiracy theory in a blockbuster movie—between the Google searches for the one and only Elon Musk and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS). As we delve into this rather peculiar investigation, we aim to shed light on the uncharted territory where internet intrigue intersects with the intricate dance of stock market fluctuations.
The maverick entrepreneur, real-life Tony Stark, or simply "the guy who wants to colonize Mars" (take your pick)—Elon Musk has become an icon of our digital age. Whether it's his ambitious ventures in space exploration, electrifying transportation, or cryptic tweets that send the internet into a frenzy, Musk's presence permeates the online realm with unwavering curiosity. However, what may appear to be mere internet chatter and the occasional meme about flamethrowers may hold a surprising influence on the financial performance of Morgan Stanley, a stalwart institution in the world of investment banking.
This study seeks to quench the thirst for understanding the elusive and, dare we say, electrifying link between public interest in Elon Musk, as reflected in Google search trends, and the stock price movements of Morgan Stanley. Our analysis spans a timeframe from 2010 to 2023, harnessing the formidable power of data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover the tantalizing correlations, or perhaps even causations, between the two seemingly disparate domains. The sheer audacity of this inquiry may prompt skepticism, amusement, or perhaps even a raised eyebrow, but we venture forth with unwavering academic rigor in pursuit of truth, no matter how peculiar it may seem.
As we venture into this uncharted intersection of internet fascination and financial market dynamics, we invite the reader to suspend disbelief and join us in an expedition that promises to unravel an unexpected link that may challenge conventional wisdom. We acknowledge that this path less traveled may be fraught with skepticism and raised eyebrows, but to quote the illustrious Mr. Musk himself, "You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great...and that's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and thinking that the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than going out there and being among the stars."

There you go! I hope this paper brings some levity to the academic scene with its unabashed humor and playfulness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. This close relationship was further confirmed by the substantial r-squared value of 0.9019783, signifying that approximately 90.20% of the variability in Morgan Stanley's stock price can be explained by fluctuations in the level of public interest in the enigmatic entrepreneur.

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, allowing us to confidently reject the null hypothesis that there is no association between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and Morgan Stanley's stock price.

In Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrates the compelling correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the corresponding movements in Morgan Stanley's stock price. The scatterplot visually captures the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

The robust statistical findings from our investigation underscore the surprising interconnectedness between public interest in Elon Musk and the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock, highlighting the fascinating interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements. This unexpected link serves as a testament to the uncharted territory of the digital age and its potential impact on traditional financial dynamics.

The significant results of this study beckon further exploration into the quirky dynamics of internet fascination and its impact on the stock market, challenging conventional wisdom and revealing the whimsical connections that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employ statistical methods to quantify the potential impact of public interest in Elon Musk on the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong and noteworthy association between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur and the fluctuations in Morgan Stanley's stock price. Our study sheds light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, uncovering an unexpected link that elicits further inquiries into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its influence on stock performance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the fascinating relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) has sparked curiosity and debate among researchers and enthusiasts alike. This curious juxtaposition of internet curiosity and financial market movements has captured the imagination of academics, prompting a search for understanding in the unlikeliest of places. In "Mind and Money: The Intersection of Online Behavior and Stock Performance," Smith and Doe delve into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its potential impact on stock performance, setting the stage for our own investigation into the captivating correlation between public interest in the enigmatic entrepreneur and the financial fortunes of Morgan Stanley.
Jones et al. further stoke our curiosity in "Digital Echoes: Unearthing the Subtle Ripples of Internet Intrigue," as they shed light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, unveiling an unexpected link that propels our inquiry forward.
As we turn to the non-fiction works, "The Age of Google" by Dikat and "Big Stock, Little Search: An Unorthodox Confusion" by Overstock, we encounter a wealth of knowledge and insight into the transformative power of the internet and its intersection with the hallowed halls of finance. These works serve as beacons of knowledge in a sea of speculation, guiding us through the tumultuous waters of digital fascination and market dynamics.
Departing from the realm of non-fiction, we draw inspiration from fictional works that offer a whimsical and thought-provoking take on the enigmatic connection we seek to unravel. "The Electric Stock Market" by A. Random Author and "Memeonomics: A Tale of Internet and Investments" by Punny McPunface offer playful yet poignant reflections on the intersection of online intrigue and financial performance, infusing our academic journey with a dash of levity and imagination.
In a quest for a different perspective, we turn to cinematic experiences that, though tangentially related, offer an opportunity for introspection and, dare I say, entertainment. "The Social Network" and "The Wolf of Wall Street" allow us to peer into the tumultuous world of digital innovation and financial machinations, offering valuable insights disguised within the glamorous façade of Hollywood storytelling.
As we traverse the landscape of literature and media, these diverse sources serve as guideposts in our pursuit to unravel the extraordinary connection between the digital footprints of Elon Musk enthusiasts and the ebb and flow of Morgan Stanley's stock price.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. This close relationship was further confirmed by the substantial r-squared value of 0.9019783, signifying that approximately 90.20% of the variability in Morgan Stanley's stock price can be explained by fluctuations in the level of public interest in the enigmatic entrepreneur.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, allowing us to confidently reject the null hypothesis that there is no association between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and Morgan Stanley's stock price.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrates the compelling correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the corresponding movements in Morgan Stanley's stock price. The scatterplot visually captures the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
The robust statistical findings from our investigation underscore the surprising interconnectedness between public interest in Elon Musk and the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock, highlighting the fascinating interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements. This unexpected link serves as a testament to the uncharted territory of the digital age and its potential impact on traditional financial dynamics.
The significant results of this study beckon further exploration into the quirky dynamics of internet fascination and its impact on the stock market, challenging conventional wisdom and revealing the whimsical connections that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation provide compelling evidence of a substantial and, dare I say, electrifying connection between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur Elon Musk and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS). This remarkable correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9497254, in essence, suggests that the heartbeat of internet interest in Musk pulsates in tandem with the fluctuations of Morgan Stanley's stock price, almost as if the stock market is dancing to the rhythm of the Google search algorithm. Our findings not only echo the sentiments of Smith and Doe, who delved into the intriguing intersection of online behavior and stock performance, but also resonate with the digital echoes uncovered by Jones et al., as we continue to unearth the subtle ripples of internet intrigue embedded within the financial market.

Moreover, our results align with the insightful musings of A. Random Author and Punny McPunface, as we witness the whimsical yet impactful union of online fascination and financial movements. The statistical significance we observed, with a p-value of less than 0.01, definitively rejects the notion of an absence of association between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and Morgan Stanley's stock price, affirming the potent influence of cyber curiosity on the financial realm. This revelation opens the door to a cascade of inquiries, inviting us to peel back the layers of internet allure and its unorthodox confusions in shaping market dynamics.

The robust R-squared value of 0.9019783 further underlines the entwined nature of these phenomena, implying that approximately 90.20% of the variability in Morgan Stanley's stock price can be elucidated by the fluctuations in public interest in Elon Musk, a testament to the significant impact of digital intrigue on traditional financial paradigms. Our findings, encapsulated in the tight clustering of data points within the scatterplot, depict a visually striking narrative of the intricate dance between online fascination and market performance, pointing to a potent alignment that may not be entirely arbitrary.

In essence, our study not only affirms the inextricable bond between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and Morgan Stanley's stock price, but also invites further exploration into the peculiar dynamics of internet fascination and its captivating influence on the stock market. This unexpected link, woven into the fabric of our digitized era, challenges conventional wisdom and beckons forth a quirky yet profound understanding of the interplay between online interest and financial movements.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'elon musk' and Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employ statistical methods to quantify the potential impact of public interest in Elon Musk on the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong and noteworthy association between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur and the fluctuations in Morgan Stanley's stock price. Our study sheds light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, uncovering an unexpected link that elicits further inquiries into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its influence on stock performance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of finance and the labyrinth of the internet are two distinct realms, each with its own enigmatic nature and unpredictable patterns. While the former is governed by intricate financial models and market dynamics, the latter is an ever-evolving digital landscape brimming with memes, cat videos, and, of course, relentless fascination with certain public figures. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the connection—seemingly as preposterous as a conspiracy theory in a blockbuster movie—between the Google searches for the one and only Elon Musk and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS). As we delve into this rather peculiar investigation, we aim to shed light on the uncharted territory where internet intrigue intersects with the intricate dance of stock market fluctuations.
The maverick entrepreneur, real-life Tony Stark, or simply "the guy who wants to colonize Mars" (take your pick)—Elon Musk has become an icon of our digital age. Whether it's his ambitious ventures in space exploration, electrifying transportation, or cryptic tweets that send the internet into a frenzy, Musk's presence permeates the online realm with unwavering curiosity. However, what may appear to be mere internet chatter and the occasional meme about flamethrowers may hold a surprising influence on the financial performance of Morgan Stanley, a stalwart institution in the world of investment banking.
This study seeks to quench the thirst for understanding the elusive and, dare we say, electrifying link between public interest in Elon Musk, as reflected in Google search trends, and the stock price movements of Morgan Stanley. Our analysis spans a timeframe from 2010 to 2023, harnessing the formidable power of data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to uncover the tantalizing correlations, or perhaps even causations, between the two seemingly disparate domains. The sheer audacity of this inquiry may prompt skepticism, amusement, or perhaps even a raised eyebrow, but we venture forth with unwavering academic rigor in pursuit of truth, no matter how peculiar it may seem.
As we venture into this uncharted intersection of internet fascination and financial market dynamics, we invite the reader to suspend disbelief and join us in an expedition that promises to unravel an unexpected link that may challenge conventional wisdom. We acknowledge that this path less traveled may be fraught with skepticism and raised eyebrows, but to quote the illustrious Mr. Musk himself, "You want to wake up in the morning and think the future is going to be great...and that's what being a spacefaring civilization is all about. It's about believing in the future and thinking that the future will be better than the past. And I can't think of anything more exciting than going out there and being among the stars."

There you go! I hope this paper brings some levity to the academic scene with its unabashed humor and playfulness.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. This close relationship was further confirmed by the substantial r-squared value of 0.9019783, signifying that approximately 90.20% of the variability in Morgan Stanley's stock price can be explained by fluctuations in the level of public interest in the enigmatic entrepreneur.
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated a statistically significant relationship between the two variables, allowing us to confidently reject the null hypothesis that there is no association between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and Morgan Stanley's stock price.
In Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrates the compelling correlation between the frequency of Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the corresponding movements in Morgan Stanley's stock price. The scatterplot visually captures the tight clustering of data points, emphasizing the strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
The robust statistical findings from our investigation underscore the surprising interconnectedness between public interest in Elon Musk and the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock, highlighting the fascinating interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements. This unexpected link serves as a testament to the uncharted territory of the digital age and its potential impact on traditional financial dynamics.
The significant results of this study beckon further exploration into the quirky dynamics of internet fascination and its impact on the stock market, challenging conventional wisdom and revealing the whimsical connections that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a captivating correlation between Google searches for the enigmatic Elon Musk and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS). This unexpected link has unfurled like a Tesla Roadster hurtling into the vast expanse of cyberspace, leaving even the most seasoned financial experts befuddled. It seems that the electrifying allure of Elon Musk has transcended from memes and Mars missions to reverberate within the hallowed halls of the stock market.

The statistical rigidity of our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9497254, provides a firm anchor to this whimsical connection, as sturdy as the rockets that propel Musk's ambitions. The r-squared value of 0.9019783 further cements the notion that fluctuations in public interest in Musk explain a significant chunk of the variability in Morgan Stanley's stock price, as if the market itself were dancing to the tune of Musk's unorthodox tweets.

Our study does not just hint at a correlation; it screams it from the proverbial digital rooftops. And with a p-value of less than 0.01, one could argue that the relationship is as statistically significant as Musk’s Twitter hiatus. The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually encapsulates this tight bond, demonstrating a coupling as snug as a Cybertruck in a supercharger station.

This astonishing revelation prods us to reevaluate traditional wisdom and dives headfirst into the uncharted waters of internet influence on financial markets. However, let's not overcomplicate matters. The stock market, like Musk's ventures, can be an enigma wrapped in a mystery, but our findings suggest that perhaps, just perhaps, tapping into the boundless energy of internet fascination may yield insights as valuable as a fully charged Powerwall.

In summation, we assert that no further research is necessary in this area, as delving deeper might necessitate a level of understanding that eludes even the most technologically inclined among us. The electrifying connection between Google searches for Elon Musk and Morgan Stanley's stock price has been illuminated, leaving us to ponder the delightful enigma that is the intersection of internet intrigue and stock market movements.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Speculative Finance and Technology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advanced Tech and Finance Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Googling Elon Musk: The Shocking Connection to Morgan Stanley's Stock Price with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the relationship between Google searches for "Elon Musk" and the stock price of Morgan Stanley (MS) over the period of 2010 to 2023. Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we employ statistical methods to quantify the potential impact of public interest in Elon Musk on the performance of Morgan Stanley's stock. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9497254 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong and noteworthy association between Google searches for the enigmatic entrepreneur and the fluctuations in Morgan Stanley's stock price. Our study sheds light on the curious interplay between online search behavior and financial market movements, uncovering an unexpected link that elicits further inquiries into the intricate dynamics of internet fascination and its influence on stock performance.

ChatGPT:

Elon Musk, Google search, Morgan Stanley stock price, relationship, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, public interest, LSEG Analytics, Google Trends, financial market movements, online search behavior, stock performance, internet fascination.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'elon musk'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'elon musk' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'elon musk'

Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Morgan Stanley (MS) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS)

Correlation r = 0.9497254 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9019783 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'elon musk') over the 14 years from 2010 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.091E-7. 0.0000002090879011860325900000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 2.091E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,782,677 random variables You don't actually need 4 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'elon musk' (Rel. search volume)1011.7523.833334.66667815.7510.333322.333331.833342.916727
Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS) (Stock price)30.727.6315.7620.1631.3339.0530.743.0952.7639.0251.269.2899.3385.64




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,0,1,1.75,2,3.83333,4.66667,8,15.75,10.3333,22.3333,31.8333,42.9167,27,])
array_2 = np.array([30.7,27.63,15.76,20.16,31.33,39.05,30.7,43.09,52.76,39.02,51.2,69.28,99.33,85.64,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'elon musk'"
array_2_name = "Morgan Stanley's stock price (MS)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 1967 · Black Variable ID: 1502 · Red Variable ID: 1600
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0