Download png, svg
AI explanation
As fewer people became qualified to work in telecommunications, there was a corresponding decrease in telemarketing calls, leading to a reduced demand for kerosene-powered generators in Libya.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'] Generate an image portraying a bustling Libyan marketplace with a futuristic twist. Show a group of students holding holographic Associate's degrees in Communications technologies, illuminated in blue and green hues, while a vendor's cart emits a holographic representation of kerosene, creating an otherworldly, vibrant atmosphere. In the background, incorporate futuristic architecture and vibrant alien species engaging in daily activities. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' A photo-realistic image Vaporwave An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Libyan marketplace, a group of students proudly display their newly earned Associate's degrees in Communications technologies. Nearby, a vendor sells kerosene from a brightly colored cart, filling the air with its distinct smell as people go about their daily activities.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Libyan marketplace, a group of students proudly display their newly earned Associate's degrees in Communications technologies. Nearby, a vendor sells kerosene from a brightly colored cart, filling the air with its distinct smell as people go about their daily activities. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'] Generate an image portraying a bustling Libyan marketplace with a futuristic twist. Show a group of students holding holographic Associate's degrees in Communications technologies, illuminated in blue and green hues, while a vendor's cart emits a holographic representation of kerosene, creating an otherworldly, vibrant atmosphere. In the background, incorporate futuristic architecture and vibrant alien species engaging in daily activities.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies caused Kerosene used in Libya to decrease.
AI academic paper
Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look The Journal of Comical Correlations Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. While the connection between these two may seem as far-fetched as a flamingo wearing a tailcoat, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising correlation. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Much like a skilled juggler, our findings may seem like trying to balance kerosene barrels on unicycles, but they have raised intriguing questions about potential underlying factors. It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are engaged in a tango, and we're just trying to keep up with the rhythm.
So, why the connection? Is it a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, resulting in an uptick in kerosene consumption? Or perhaps there's a deeper societal shift at play, linking the evolution of communication technologies with changes in energy use.
As we embark on this comical quest to uncover the underlying reasons behind this unexpected pairing, we invite readers to put on their thinking caps and join us in our exploration of this scholarly oddity. After all, deciphering the connection between kerosene and communication may just ignite a spark of curiosity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. While the connection between these two may seem as far-fetched as a flamingo wearing a tailcoat, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising correlation. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Much like a skilled juggler, our findings may seem like trying to balance kerosene barrels on unicycles, but they have raised intriguing questions about potential underlying factors. It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are engaged in a tango, and we're just trying to keep up with the rhythm.
So, why the connection? Is it a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, resulting in an uptick in kerosene consumption? Or perhaps there's a deeper societal shift at play, linking the evolution of communication technologies with changes in energy use.
As we embark on this comical quest to uncover the underlying reasons behind this unexpected pairing, we invite readers to put on their thinking caps and join us in our exploration of this scholarly oddity. After all, deciphering the connection between kerosene and communication may just ignite a spark of curiosity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to uncover peculiar relationships that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation delves into the curiously unexpected correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. It is a topic that may leave some scratching their heads, much like trying to figure out which came first, the chicken or the egg, but with a distinctly flammable twist.
As we eagerly embraced this research endeavor, we couldn't help but wonder – what do you call a kerosene-loving communicator? A lantern speaker! Now, back to our scholarly pursuits.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our analysis may elicit raised eyebrows, much like discovering a lampshade on a tree. But rest assured, we scrutinized the data with all the seriousness of a magician investigating a disappearing act.
Our exploration into this unexpected correlation led us down a path riddled with riddles, not unlike a maze carefully crafted by a mischievous mind. Because when it comes to meandering through the labyrinth of academic inquiry, one must always keep an illuminating sense of humor close at hand.
So, why would the awarding of Communications technologies Associates degrees and kerosene consumption be intertwined? It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are in cahoots, conspiring to confound us. Almost like a punny dad joke, the phenomenon is begging to be unravelled, leaving us pondering – are these findings a fluke or do they shine a light on something greater?
We invite fellow enthusiasts of the quirky and the curious to join us on this scholarly escapade, as we endeavor to shed light on the unexpected kinship between kerosene and communication technologies. With a hint of levity, a dash of determination, and a dollop of delight, we aim to plumb the depths of this enigmatic correlation and ignite a spark of inquiry that will illuminate minds for years to come.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. While the connection between these two may seem as far-fetched as a flamingo wearing a tailcoat, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising correlation. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Much like a skilled juggler, our findings may seem like trying to balance kerosene barrels on unicycles, but they have raised intriguing questions about potential underlying factors. It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are engaged in a tango, and we're just trying to keep up with the rhythm.
So, why the connection? Is it a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, resulting in an uptick in kerosene consumption? Or perhaps there's a deeper societal shift at play, linking the evolution of communication technologies with changes in energy use.
As we embark on this comical quest to uncover the underlying reasons behind this unexpected pairing, we invite readers to put on their thinking caps and join us in our exploration of this scholarly oddity. After all, deciphering the connection between kerosene and communication may just ignite a spark of curiosity.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to uncover peculiar relationships that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation delves into the curiously unexpected correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. It is a topic that may leave some scratching their heads, much like trying to figure out which came first, the chicken or the egg, but with a distinctly flammable twist.
As we eagerly embraced this research endeavor, we couldn't help but wonder – what do you call a kerosene-loving communicator? A lantern speaker! Now, back to our scholarly pursuits.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our analysis may elicit raised eyebrows, much like discovering a lampshade on a tree. But rest assured, we scrutinized the data with all the seriousness of a magician investigating a disappearing act.
Our exploration into this unexpected correlation led us down a path riddled with riddles, not unlike a maze carefully crafted by a mischievous mind. Because when it comes to meandering through the labyrinth of academic inquiry, one must always keep an illuminating sense of humor close at hand.
So, why would the awarding of Communications technologies Associates degrees and kerosene consumption be intertwined? It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are in cahoots, conspiring to confound us. Almost like a punny dad joke, the phenomenon is begging to be unravelled, leaving us pondering – are these findings a fluke or do they shine a light on something greater?
We invite fellow enthusiasts of the quirky and the curious to join us on this scholarly escapade, as we endeavor to shed light on the unexpected kinship between kerosene and communication technologies. With a hint of levity, a dash of determination, and a dollop of delight, we aim to plumb the depths of this enigmatic correlation and ignite a spark of inquiry that will illuminate minds for years to come.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The surprising connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya has been a subject of scholarly bewilderment. Smith and Doe (2018) delved into the evolving landscape of technology and education, but little did they know they were about to stumble upon a correlation as unexpected as finding a can of kerosene at a technology conference.
In "Book," the authors find evidence that the proliferation of communication technologies has had far-reaching effects on various aspects of society, including education and energy consumption. It's as if the internet and kerosene are engaged in an epic battle, and we're just trying to navigate through the memes and the fumes.
Previous studies have explored the impact of educational pursuits on lifestyle choices, but none have unearthed a relationship as intriguing as the one we are about to unearth. It's like finding a treasure map leading to a stash of kerosene barrels in the library – unexpected, but undeniably captivating.
Turning to "Non-Fiction Book" and "Another Non-Fiction Book," the authors scrutinize the societal implications of technological advancements and energy practices. But little did they know they were about to be outshone by the unexpected bond between kerosene consumption and communication degrees. It's as if the Kerosene Fairy decided to sprinkle a little extra spark on the paths of academic pursuit, just for kicks.
In the realm of fiction, "Sci-Fi Novel" and "Mystery Novel" present stories filled with high-tech gadgets and mysterious plot twists, creating an ambiance that may just hold a hint of relevance to our own scholarly adventure. It's like navigating a labyrinth of literary wonders, only to stumble upon a clue that ties dystopian futures with our present-day anomaly.
Furthermore, a recent social media post by @TechEnthusiast247 muses that the surge in online learning programs may have inadvertently sparked an increase in kerosene use among students burning the midnight oil. It's as if the digital age and the age-old kerosene lamp have united in a dance of academic enlightenment, or perhaps, a beacon of internet memes.
And speaking of memes, did you hear about the kerosene lamp that went viral? It was shedding light on a whole new level! But I digress.
This curious conundrum has piqued the interest of scholars and enthusiasts alike, leaving many to ponder the unexpected ways in which communication technologies and energy consumption intersect. As we wade through the sea of data and speculation, one thing becomes clear – the connection between kerosene and communication technologies is as captivating as it is comical. Let the scholarly chuckles and light-hearted ponderings commence!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2011 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. While the connection between these two may seem as far-fetched as a flamingo wearing a tailcoat, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising correlation. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Much like a skilled juggler, our findings may seem like trying to balance kerosene barrels on unicycles, but they have raised intriguing questions about potential underlying factors. It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are engaged in a tango, and we're just trying to keep up with the rhythm.
So, why the connection? Is it a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, resulting in an uptick in kerosene consumption? Or perhaps there's a deeper societal shift at play, linking the evolution of communication technologies with changes in energy use.
As we embark on this comical quest to uncover the underlying reasons behind this unexpected pairing, we invite readers to put on their thinking caps and join us in our exploration of this scholarly oddity. After all, deciphering the connection between kerosene and communication may just ignite a spark of curiosity.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to uncover peculiar relationships that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation delves into the curiously unexpected correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. It is a topic that may leave some scratching their heads, much like trying to figure out which came first, the chicken or the egg, but with a distinctly flammable twist.
As we eagerly embraced this research endeavor, we couldn't help but wonder – what do you call a kerosene-loving communicator? A lantern speaker! Now, back to our scholarly pursuits.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our analysis may elicit raised eyebrows, much like discovering a lampshade on a tree. But rest assured, we scrutinized the data with all the seriousness of a magician investigating a disappearing act.
Our exploration into this unexpected correlation led us down a path riddled with riddles, not unlike a maze carefully crafted by a mischievous mind. Because when it comes to meandering through the labyrinth of academic inquiry, one must always keep an illuminating sense of humor close at hand.
So, why would the awarding of Communications technologies Associates degrees and kerosene consumption be intertwined? It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are in cahoots, conspiring to confound us. Almost like a punny dad joke, the phenomenon is begging to be unravelled, leaving us pondering – are these findings a fluke or do they shine a light on something greater?
We invite fellow enthusiasts of the quirky and the curious to join us on this scholarly escapade, as we endeavor to shed light on the unexpected kinship between kerosene and communication technologies. With a hint of levity, a dash of determination, and a dollop of delight, we aim to plumb the depths of this enigmatic correlation and ignite a spark of inquiry that will illuminate minds for years to come.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya, our research approach was as meticulous as trying to untangle a ball of yarn in a room full of playful kittens.
First, we gathered data from the National Center for Education Statistics to track the annual number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies in the United States. Then, we harnessed the Energy Information Administration's data to ascertain the annual kerosene consumption in Libya. Much like a resourceful detective, we scoured these sources for relevant information, occasionally feeling like we were on a quest for hidden treasure in a library filled with flammable books.
After painstakingly compiling and organizing the data spanning the years 2011 to 2021, we conducted a series of analyses that would make a mathematician proud. Our statistical methods included calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables. We also performed a regression analysis to sniff out any potential predictive power of the Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies on kerosene consumption in Libya. It was like trying to predict which way the wind blows, but with far more fiery implications.
When it came to testing the validity of our findings, we made like a cautious firefighter and exercised rigorous caution. We used a significance level of 0.01 to determine whether the observed correlation was not just a fluke, much like scrutinizing whether a shadow on the wall is actually a mischievous imp or just a trick of the light.
To further add a layer of depth to our analysis, we also delved into secondary data sources and scholarly literature, seeking to contextualize our findings within the broader landscape of education, technology, and energy consumption. In doing so, we aimed to shine a spotlight on the multifaceted nature of this unexpected correlation while keeping our spirits buoyed with the occasional pun, much like a beacon of light guiding us through the scholarly seas.
Ultimately, our research methods unfolded like a suspenseful mystery novel, with each analysis and examination bringing us closer to unraveling the tangled web of associations between kerosene and Communication technologies Associates degrees. Our journey may have been illuminated by the occasional dad joke, but make no mistake – our methods were as rigorous as a marathon runner with a torch, chasing the elusive connection between these seemingly disparate elements.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9151929, r-squared of 0.8375781, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. While the connection between these two may seem as far-fetched as a flamingo wearing a tailcoat, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising correlation. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Much like a skilled juggler, our findings may seem like trying to balance kerosene barrels on unicycles, but they have raised intriguing questions about potential underlying factors. It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are engaged in a tango, and we're just trying to keep up with the rhythm.
So, why the connection? Is it a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, resulting in an uptick in kerosene consumption? Or perhaps there's a deeper societal shift at play, linking the evolution of communication technologies with changes in energy use.
As we embark on this comical quest to uncover the underlying reasons behind this unexpected pairing, we invite readers to put on their thinking caps and join us in our exploration of this scholarly oddity. After all, deciphering the connection between kerosene and communication may just ignite a spark of curiosity.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to uncover peculiar relationships that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation delves into the curiously unexpected correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. It is a topic that may leave some scratching their heads, much like trying to figure out which came first, the chicken or the egg, but with a distinctly flammable twist.
As we eagerly embraced this research endeavor, we couldn't help but wonder – what do you call a kerosene-loving communicator? A lantern speaker! Now, back to our scholarly pursuits.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our analysis may elicit raised eyebrows, much like discovering a lampshade on a tree. But rest assured, we scrutinized the data with all the seriousness of a magician investigating a disappearing act.
Our exploration into this unexpected correlation led us down a path riddled with riddles, not unlike a maze carefully crafted by a mischievous mind. Because when it comes to meandering through the labyrinth of academic inquiry, one must always keep an illuminating sense of humor close at hand.
So, why would the awarding of Communications technologies Associates degrees and kerosene consumption be intertwined? It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are in cahoots, conspiring to confound us. Almost like a punny dad joke, the phenomenon is begging to be unravelled, leaving us pondering – are these findings a fluke or do they shine a light on something greater?
We invite fellow enthusiasts of the quirky and the curious to join us on this scholarly escapade, as we endeavor to shed light on the unexpected kinship between kerosene and communication technologies. With a hint of levity, a dash of determination, and a dollop of delight, we aim to plumb the depths of this enigmatic correlation and ignite a spark of inquiry that will illuminate minds for years to come.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and an r-squared of 0.8375781 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables. It's as if the degrees and the kerosene were exchanging Morse code signals with each other!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing this eyebrow-raising correlation, almost like a visual punchline waiting to be delivered at a scientific stand-up comedy show. Now, if only we could figure out the kerosene's favorite communication technology – it's probably "sealing" wax!
The robustness of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests that this unexpected relationship is not to be dismissed lightly, much like an ill-advised attempt to extinguish a kerosene fire with a soap bubble. It seems that there's more to this peculiar pairing than meets the eye, although meeting the eye through a cloud of kerosene fumes is not recommended.
It's clear that these findings raise more questions than they answer. Why would there be a connection between Communications technologies Associates degrees and kerosene consumption in Libya? It's almost as if they formed a dynamic duo, like two superheroes fighting climate change – DataMan and Kerosene Komrade!
In unraveling this unexpected partnership, we shine a light on the interplay between education and energy use, prompting us to ponder whether there's a deeper narrative at play, like a well-crafted thriller with enough plot twists to make even Sherlock Holmes raise an eyebrow. Perhaps the students studying Communications technologies are simply burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, inadvertently fueling an increase in kerosene consumption. It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the incorporation of petroleum byproducts into human society!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. While the connection between these two may seem as far-fetched as a flamingo wearing a tailcoat, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising correlation. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Much like a skilled juggler, our findings may seem like trying to balance kerosene barrels on unicycles, but they have raised intriguing questions about potential underlying factors. It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are engaged in a tango, and we're just trying to keep up with the rhythm.
So, why the connection? Is it a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, resulting in an uptick in kerosene consumption? Or perhaps there's a deeper societal shift at play, linking the evolution of communication technologies with changes in energy use.
As we embark on this comical quest to uncover the underlying reasons behind this unexpected pairing, we invite readers to put on their thinking caps and join us in our exploration of this scholarly oddity. After all, deciphering the connection between kerosene and communication may just ignite a spark of curiosity.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The surprising connection between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya has been a subject of scholarly bewilderment. Smith and Doe (2018) delved into the evolving landscape of technology and education, but little did they know they were about to stumble upon a correlation as unexpected as finding a can of kerosene at a technology conference.
In "Book," the authors find evidence that the proliferation of communication technologies has had far-reaching effects on various aspects of society, including education and energy consumption. It's as if the internet and kerosene are engaged in an epic battle, and we're just trying to navigate through the memes and the fumes.
Previous studies have explored the impact of educational pursuits on lifestyle choices, but none have unearthed a relationship as intriguing as the one we are about to unearth. It's like finding a treasure map leading to a stash of kerosene barrels in the library – unexpected, but undeniably captivating.
Turning to "Non-Fiction Book" and "Another Non-Fiction Book," the authors scrutinize the societal implications of technological advancements and energy practices. But little did they know they were about to be outshone by the unexpected bond between kerosene consumption and communication degrees. It's as if the Kerosene Fairy decided to sprinkle a little extra spark on the paths of academic pursuit, just for kicks.
In the realm of fiction, "Sci-Fi Novel" and "Mystery Novel" present stories filled with high-tech gadgets and mysterious plot twists, creating an ambiance that may just hold a hint of relevance to our own scholarly adventure. It's like navigating a labyrinth of literary wonders, only to stumble upon a clue that ties dystopian futures with our present-day anomaly.
Furthermore, a recent social media post by @TechEnthusiast247 muses that the surge in online learning programs may have inadvertently sparked an increase in kerosene use among students burning the midnight oil. It's as if the digital age and the age-old kerosene lamp have united in a dance of academic enlightenment, or perhaps, a beacon of internet memes.
And speaking of memes, did you hear about the kerosene lamp that went viral? It was shedding light on a whole new level! But I digress.
This curious conundrum has piqued the interest of scholars and enthusiasts alike, leaving many to ponder the unexpected ways in which communication technologies and energy consumption intersect. As we wade through the sea of data and speculation, one thing becomes clear – the connection between kerosene and communication technologies is as captivating as it is comical. Let the scholarly chuckles and light-hearted ponderings commence!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and an r-squared of 0.8375781 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables. It's as if the degrees and the kerosene were exchanging Morse code signals with each other!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing this eyebrow-raising correlation, almost like a visual punchline waiting to be delivered at a scientific stand-up comedy show. Now, if only we could figure out the kerosene's favorite communication technology – it's probably "sealing" wax!
The robustness of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests that this unexpected relationship is not to be dismissed lightly, much like an ill-advised attempt to extinguish a kerosene fire with a soap bubble. It seems that there's more to this peculiar pairing than meets the eye, although meeting the eye through a cloud of kerosene fumes is not recommended.
It's clear that these findings raise more questions than they answer. Why would there be a connection between Communications technologies Associates degrees and kerosene consumption in Libya? It's almost as if they formed a dynamic duo, like two superheroes fighting climate change – DataMan and Kerosene Komrade!
In unraveling this unexpected partnership, we shine a light on the interplay between education and energy use, prompting us to ponder whether there's a deeper narrative at play, like a well-crafted thriller with enough plot twists to make even Sherlock Holmes raise an eyebrow. Perhaps the students studying Communications technologies are simply burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, inadvertently fueling an increase in kerosene consumption. It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the incorporation of petroleum byproducts into human society!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The unexpected correlation we unveiled between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya from 2011 to 2021 ignites a lively debate akin to a parliament of owls discussing their favorite puns. Our results support and elevate the bewilderment of previous scholars, firmly establishing this unusual relationship as more than a flight of fancy – or in this case, a flight of flaming kerosene lamps shaped like graduation caps.
Our findings align with the work of Smith and Doe (2018), who inadvertently stumbled upon the correlation as unexpected as finding a can of kerosene at a technology conference. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value substantiate the substantial positive relationship, akin to the strong bond between peanut butter and jelly – or in this case, the remarkable kinship between communication technologies and kerosene consumption. It's almost as if they've been sending each other encrypted messages that only the statistical analysis has been able to decipher - and it turns out, the kerosene was speaking in morse code all along!
The comical quandary of how these seemingly disparate variables could be intertwined is not to be dismissed lightly, much like an ill-advised attempt to extinguish a kerosene fire with a soap bubble. Our results mirror the unexpected connection illuminated in literature, confirming that the kerosene and the degrees are indeed engaged in an intricate tango, much like a pair of synchronized swimmers performing an aquatic pas de deux.
While this research journey has been filled with chuckles and light-hearted ponderings, our findings prompt more serious reflection on the underlying reasons behind this surprising pairing. It's as if the students studying Communications technologies are inadvertently fueling an increase in kerosene consumption by burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees. It's like a classic dad joke – simple, timeless, and surprisingly effective in sparking scholarly intrigue.
In essence, our results not only corroborate previous scholarly musings but also pave the way for further contemplation on the interplay between communication technologies education and energy use. Just like a good dad joke, this unexpected connection demands further exploration, inviting us to unravel the nuances of this scholarly oddity and perhaps uncover a treasure trove of kerosene-lit puns waiting to be cracked.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and Kerosene used in Libya. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. While the connection between these two may seem as far-fetched as a flamingo wearing a tailcoat, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising correlation. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Much like a skilled juggler, our findings may seem like trying to balance kerosene barrels on unicycles, but they have raised intriguing questions about potential underlying factors. It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are engaged in a tango, and we're just trying to keep up with the rhythm.
So, why the connection? Is it a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, resulting in an uptick in kerosene consumption? Or perhaps there's a deeper societal shift at play, linking the evolution of communication technologies with changes in energy use.
As we embark on this comical quest to uncover the underlying reasons behind this unexpected pairing, we invite readers to put on their thinking caps and join us in our exploration of this scholarly oddity. After all, deciphering the connection between kerosene and communication may just ignite a spark of curiosity.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon to uncover peculiar relationships that defy conventional wisdom. Our investigation delves into the curiously unexpected correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. It is a topic that may leave some scratching their heads, much like trying to figure out which came first, the chicken or the egg, but with a distinctly flammable twist.
As we eagerly embraced this research endeavor, we couldn't help but wonder – what do you call a kerosene-loving communicator? A lantern speaker! Now, back to our scholarly pursuits.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our analysis may elicit raised eyebrows, much like discovering a lampshade on a tree. But rest assured, we scrutinized the data with all the seriousness of a magician investigating a disappearing act.
Our exploration into this unexpected correlation led us down a path riddled with riddles, not unlike a maze carefully crafted by a mischievous mind. Because when it comes to meandering through the labyrinth of academic inquiry, one must always keep an illuminating sense of humor close at hand.
So, why would the awarding of Communications technologies Associates degrees and kerosene consumption be intertwined? It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are in cahoots, conspiring to confound us. Almost like a punny dad joke, the phenomenon is begging to be unravelled, leaving us pondering – are these findings a fluke or do they shine a light on something greater?
We invite fellow enthusiasts of the quirky and the curious to join us on this scholarly escapade, as we endeavor to shed light on the unexpected kinship between kerosene and communication technologies. With a hint of levity, a dash of determination, and a dollop of delight, we aim to plumb the depths of this enigmatic correlation and ignite a spark of inquiry that will illuminate minds for years to come.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and an r-squared of 0.8375781 indicated a strong positive relationship between the two variables. It's as if the degrees and the kerosene were exchanging Morse code signals with each other!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing this eyebrow-raising correlation, almost like a visual punchline waiting to be delivered at a scientific stand-up comedy show. Now, if only we could figure out the kerosene's favorite communication technology – it's probably "sealing" wax!
The robustness of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests that this unexpected relationship is not to be dismissed lightly, much like an ill-advised attempt to extinguish a kerosene fire with a soap bubble. It seems that there's more to this peculiar pairing than meets the eye, although meeting the eye through a cloud of kerosene fumes is not recommended.
It's clear that these findings raise more questions than they answer. Why would there be a connection between Communications technologies Associates degrees and kerosene consumption in Libya? It's almost as if they formed a dynamic duo, like two superheroes fighting climate change – DataMan and Kerosene Komrade!
In unraveling this unexpected partnership, we shine a light on the interplay between education and energy use, prompting us to ponder whether there's a deeper narrative at play, like a well-crafted thriller with enough plot twists to make even Sherlock Holmes raise an eyebrow. Perhaps the students studying Communications technologies are simply burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, inadvertently fueling an increase in kerosene consumption. It's a tale as old as time – or at least as old as the incorporation of petroleum byproducts into human society!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has illuminated a surprising and admittedly entertaining connection between Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and kerosene consumption in Libya. It's as if these two variables were engaged in a fiery tango, sparking our curiosity and prompting us to ponder the enlightening, albeit unexpected, correlation between the two. It's almost like witnessing an academic magic show – now you see the link, now you don't!
The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and an r-squared of 0.8375781 has not only shed light on this quirky relationship but has also left us contemplating potential underlying factors with a mix of wonder and amusement. It's like trying to figure out a clever riddle – except the answer isn't just a punchline, but a statistical revelation.
So, why would earning a Communications technologies Associates degree and kerosene consumption be intertwined? Perhaps it's a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, coincidentally fueling an increase in kerosene consumption. After all, if the pen is mightier than the sword, then maybe the degree certificate is mightier than the lamp.
Our findings, akin to a well-timed dad joke, have added a lighthearted twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding the unexpected kinship between communication technologies and kerosene. We invite scholars and enthusiasts alike to join us in this whimsical exploration, as we have not only uncovered an intriguing correlation but also unearthed a prime source of scholarly amusement.
And with that, we assert with confidence that no further research in this area is needed. Enacting this advice would be a glowing example of efficiency.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Comical Correlations
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Whimsical Sociotechnical Research (IWSR)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look with an abstract of In this paper, we explore the peculiar relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies and the consumption of kerosene in Libya. While the connection between these two may seem as far-fetched as a flamingo wearing a tailcoat, our rigorous analysis has revealed a surprising correlation. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9151929 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
Much like a skilled juggler, our findings may seem like trying to balance kerosene barrels on unicycles, but they have raised intriguing questions about potential underlying factors. It's as if the kerosene and the degrees are engaged in a tango, and we're just trying to keep up with the rhythm.
So, why the connection? Is it a case of students burning the midnight oil to earn their degrees, resulting in an uptick in kerosene consumption? Or perhaps there's a deeper societal shift at play, linking the evolution of communication technologies with changes in energy use.
As we embark on this comical quest to uncover the underlying reasons behind this unexpected pairing, we invite readers to put on their thinking caps and join us in our exploration of this scholarly oddity. After all, deciphering the connection between kerosene and communication may just ignite a spark of curiosity.
ChatGPT:
Communication technologies, Associates degrees, kerosene consumption, Libya, correlation, National Center for Education Statistics, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, societal shift, energy use, evolution of communication technologies
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologiesDetailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Communications technologies
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies
Kerosene used in Libya
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Libya in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Libya
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8375781 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Libya) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-5. 0.0000779419696326538800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.0078% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,830 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.7, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies (Degrees awarded) | 4209 | 5004 | 5028 | 4713 | 4628 | 4569 | 4307 | 4196 | 4256 | 4104 | 3909 |
Kerosene used in Libya (Million Barrels/Day) | 2 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2.80266 | 2.38986 | 2.02052 | 1.47737 | 1.47737 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4209,5004,5028,4713,4628,4569,4307,4196,4256,4104,3909,])
array_2 = np.array([2,8,6,5,3,3,2.80266,2.38986,2.02052,1.47737,1.47737,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Libya"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Associates degrees awarded in Communications technologies
- Line chart for only Kerosene used in Libya
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Correlation between Communications Technologies Associates Degrees and Kerosene Consumption in Libya: A Lighthearted Look
Hats off to you for rating!
Correlation ID: 1953 · Black Variable ID: 1221 · Red Variable ID: 24637