about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,939 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Iowa City and the second variable is Google searches for 'cia hotline'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The fumes were laced with top-secret metallic compounds that emitted a signal only detectable by the CIA, piquing the public's interest in contacting the agency.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a high-tech future cityscape in Iowa City. The sky is a vibrant blue, with wispy white clouds and a bright sun shining down. The city is modern and clean, with sleek buildings and advanced infrastructure. People in small groups are gathered outdoors, engaged in animated discussions. Some individuals are seen typing on futuristic devices, with holographic displays projecting above them. The air is crisp and fresh, with a sense of renewed energy and openness. The scene hints at conspiracy theories and a quest for information, evoking a high-tech atmosphere of curiosity and intrigue. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Pop art Charcoal Photorealism High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline', in the following situation: As air pollution decreases, people in Iowa City have more "clean air energy" to engage in conspiracy theories and "air out" their suspicions. This leads to a surge in Google searches for the CIA hotline, as residents believe they are finally "breathing easy" enough to "blow the whistle" on potential government secrets.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Iowa City, the air becomes noticeably cleaner as a gentle breeze blows through the city, carrying away traces of pollution. The blue sky becomes clearer, allowing the sun to shine brightly over the city. People in the community, feeling the improved air quality, gather in small groups to discuss various conspiracy theories, exchanging theories and suspicions. Some individuals are seen typing on their devices, searching for information about the CIA hotline on Google, their curiosity piqued by the newfound energy and air of openness brought about by the cleaner environment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Iowa City, the air becomes noticeably cleaner as a gentle breeze blows through the city, carrying away traces of pollution. The blue sky becomes clearer, allowing the sun to shine brightly over the city. People in the community, feeling the improved air quality, gather in small groups to discuss various conspiracy theories, exchanging theories and suspicions. Some individuals are seen typing on their devices, searching for information about the CIA hotline on Google, their curiosity piqued by the newfound energy and air of openness brought about by the cleaner environment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a high-tech future cityscape in Iowa City. The sky is a vibrant blue, with wispy white clouds and a bright sun shining down. The city is modern and clean, with sleek buildings and advanced infrastructure. People in small groups are gathered outdoors, engaged in animated discussions. Some individuals are seen typing on futuristic devices, with holographic displays projecting above them. The air is crisp and fresh, with a sense of renewed energy and openness. The scene hints at conspiracy theories and a quest for information, evoking a high-tech atmosphere of curiosity and intrigue.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Iowa City positively influenced cia hotline (Google searches for 'cia hotline').\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

The Journal of Quirky Environmental Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and internet searches for the term "CIA hotline" using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. The research team found a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between atmospheric contaminants and the public's interest in clandestine communications. This paper offers new insights into the quirky ways in which environmental factors may influence internet search behavior, and calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and internet searches for the term "CIA hotline" using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. The research team found a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between atmospheric contaminants and the public's interest in clandestine communications. This paper offers new insights into the quirky ways in which environmental factors may influence internet search behavior, and calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Air pollution has long been recognized as a serious public health concern, with detrimental effects on respiratory health, cardiovascular function, and overall well-being. However, the impact of air pollution on more clandestine matters such as internet search behavior has been less explored. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of online queries and attempt to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for the intriguing term "CIA hotline."

The state of Iowa is known for its sprawling cornfields, friendly residents, and, apparently, a curious interest in covert communication. Meanwhile, Iowa City, with its charming blend of academic institutions and cultural landmarks, provides an ideal backdrop for our investigation of the relationship between air pollution and the quest for clandestine connections. The juxtaposition of idyllic landscapes with the allure of secrecy sets the stage for a captivating exploration.

Venturing into the digital realm, our study leverages the power of Google Trends, a treasure trove of search query data, to uncover patterns that may hold a key to understanding the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of environmental challenges. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which atmospheric contaminants may influence the virtual quests of the populace.

By unearthing the statistical associations between air pollution levels and the fervor of "CIA hotline" searches, our research offers a quirky yet meaningful contribution to the understanding of human responses to environmental cues. As we unravel the mysteries behind these seemingly disparate phenomena, we hope to inspire further investigations into the whimsical yet consequential impacts of air pollution on the human psyche.

In the following sections, we present our methodology, data analysis, and findings, inviting readers to embark on this lighthearted yet thought-provoking journey through the realms of air pollucia-tion and digital intrigue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and internet searches for the term "CIA hotline" using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. The research team found a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between atmospheric contaminants and the public's interest in clandestine communications. This paper offers new insights into the quirky ways in which environmental factors may influence internet search behavior, and calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air pollution has long been recognized as a serious public health concern, with detrimental effects on respiratory health, cardiovascular function, and overall well-being. However, the impact of air pollution on more clandestine matters such as internet search behavior has been less explored. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of online queries and attempt to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for the intriguing term "CIA hotline."
The state of Iowa is known for its sprawling cornfields, friendly residents, and, apparently, a curious interest in covert communication. Meanwhile, Iowa City, with its charming blend of academic institutions and cultural landmarks, provides an ideal backdrop for our investigation of the relationship between air pollution and the quest for clandestine connections. The juxtaposition of idyllic landscapes with the allure of secrecy sets the stage for a captivating exploration.
Venturing into the digital realm, our study leverages the power of Google Trends, a treasure trove of search query data, to uncover patterns that may hold a key to understanding the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of environmental challenges. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which atmospheric contaminants may influence the virtual quests of the populace.
By unearthing the statistical associations between air pollution levels and the fervor of "CIA hotline" searches, our research offers a quirky yet meaningful contribution to the understanding of human responses to environmental cues. As we unravel the mysteries behind these seemingly disparate phenomena, we hope to inspire further investigations into the whimsical yet consequential impacts of air pollution on the human psyche.
In the following sections, we present our methodology, data analysis, and findings, inviting readers to embark on this lighthearted yet thought-provoking journey through the realms of air pollucia-tion and digital intrigue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have explored the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health and well-being. Smith et al. (2015) demonstrated the adverse effects of atmospheric contaminants on respiratory function, while Doe and Jones (2018) elucidated the cardiovascular risks associated with long-term exposure to air pollutants. However, the less conventional influence of air pollution on internet search behavior has received limited scholarly attention.

In "Air Quality and Online Behavior" by Davis and Brown (2017), the authors examine the relationship between particulate matter levels and keyword searches on online platforms. Their study identifies a subtle yet intriguing association between air pollution and the frequency of searches related to government agencies. Moreover, "The Digital Impacts of Air Pollution" by White and Green (2019) delves into the cognitive ramifications of environmental pollution, shedding light on the unanticipated ways in which polluted air may shape digital interactions. These studies provide a foundation for our exploration of the curious connection between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'CIA hotline'.

Expanding beyond academic research, non-fiction books such as "Choked: Life and Breath in the Age of Air Pollution" by Beth Gardiner and "This Is Your Brain on Air Pollution" by Gary W. Evans offer insightful perspectives on the far-reaching consequences of air pollution. These works not only provide valuable insights into the physiological impacts of air contaminants but also hint at the potential influence of pollution on cognitive processes and behavior.

Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Clandestine Connections" by A. Secretive and "Smoke Signals: A Tale of Internet Intrigue" by S. Earch delve into the enigmatic world of clandestine communications and digital mysteries. While these literary works are not empirical studies, they contribute to the narrative surrounding covert interactions and the allure of secrecy in the digital age.

Perhaps deviating slightly from conventional scholarly sources, the authors conducted a comprehensive review of unconventional sources, including the backs of shampoo bottles, fortune cookie messages, and the musings of particularly enigmatic pigeons in urban areas. While these sources may not conform to traditional academic standards, they provided unexpected and imaginative insights into the interplay of air pollution and enigmatic internet searches.

In essence, the literature surrounding the peculiar relationship between air pollution and Google searches for 'CIA hotline' reflects a merging of serious scholarly inquiry with quirky and at times whimsical narratives. This dynamic interplay sets the stage for our exploration of the unconventional yet thought-provoking connections between environmental factors and digital intrigue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and internet searches for the term "CIA hotline" using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. The research team found a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between atmospheric contaminants and the public's interest in clandestine communications. This paper offers new insights into the quirky ways in which environmental factors may influence internet search behavior, and calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Air pollution has long been recognized as a serious public health concern, with detrimental effects on respiratory health, cardiovascular function, and overall well-being. However, the impact of air pollution on more clandestine matters such as internet search behavior has been less explored. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of online queries and attempt to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for the intriguing term "CIA hotline."
The state of Iowa is known for its sprawling cornfields, friendly residents, and, apparently, a curious interest in covert communication. Meanwhile, Iowa City, with its charming blend of academic institutions and cultural landmarks, provides an ideal backdrop for our investigation of the relationship between air pollution and the quest for clandestine connections. The juxtaposition of idyllic landscapes with the allure of secrecy sets the stage for a captivating exploration.
Venturing into the digital realm, our study leverages the power of Google Trends, a treasure trove of search query data, to uncover patterns that may hold a key to understanding the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of environmental challenges. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which atmospheric contaminants may influence the virtual quests of the populace.
By unearthing the statistical associations between air pollution levels and the fervor of "CIA hotline" searches, our research offers a quirky yet meaningful contribution to the understanding of human responses to environmental cues. As we unravel the mysteries behind these seemingly disparate phenomena, we hope to inspire further investigations into the whimsical yet consequential impacts of air pollution on the human psyche.
In the following sections, we present our methodology, data analysis, and findings, inviting readers to embark on this lighthearted yet thought-provoking journey through the realms of air pollucia-tion and digital intrigue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The research team scoured the depths of the digital realm to procure relevant data for this investigation. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) served as a foundational source of atmospheric data, providing comprehensive information on air pollution levels in Iowa City from 2004 to 2023. Meanwhile, Google Trends emerged as a trove of fascination, offering insights into the ebb and flow of public interest in the enigmatic "CIA hotline." The team meticulously extracted search volume indices for this clandestine query over the same temporal domain, capturing the ebb and flow of virtual intrigue.

Accounting for Quirks and Quandaries:
In the pursuit of scholarly rigor, the research team navigated a series of convoluted conundrums when mining and synthesizing the data. Leveraging sophisticated algorithms and unorthodox computational techniques involving copious amounts of caffeinated beverages, the team meticulously sifted through the digital morass to discern the subtle patterns that underlie the intersection of air pollution and clandestine curiosity. The quest for scientific truth, albeit infused with a dash of whimsy, propelled the research team through a maze of idiosyncrasies inherent in the study of peculiar human proclivities.

Statistical Alchemy:
With a wink to statistical tradition and a nod to modern-day sorcery, the research team subjected the collected data to rigorous analyses, including correlation coefficients and regression models. Through the judicious application of statistical incantations and robust methodologies, the team unearthed the intriguing patterns that underscore the link between atmospheric contaminants and the curious infatuation with covert communications. The resulting statistical incantations, depicting the quirk-laden dance of air pollution and "CIA hotline" queries, provide compelling evidence of a meaningful relationship.

Ethical Quandaries:
In the pursuit of scholarly whimsy, the research team remained steadfast in upholding the principles of integrity and ethical conduct. All data utilized in this study were acquired through reputable sources and in accordance with ethical guidelines, ensuring the veracity and reliability of the findings presented herein. The lighthearted exploration of quirky phenomena, although imbued with a touch of mirth, steadfastly upholds the sanctity of scientific inquiry and scholarly integrity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.7958318, r-squared of 0.6333482, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and internet searches for the term "CIA hotline" using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. The research team found a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between atmospheric contaminants and the public's interest in clandestine communications. This paper offers new insights into the quirky ways in which environmental factors may influence internet search behavior, and calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Air pollution has long been recognized as a serious public health concern, with detrimental effects on respiratory health, cardiovascular function, and overall well-being. However, the impact of air pollution on more clandestine matters such as internet search behavior has been less explored. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of online queries and attempt to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for the intriguing term "CIA hotline."
The state of Iowa is known for its sprawling cornfields, friendly residents, and, apparently, a curious interest in covert communication. Meanwhile, Iowa City, with its charming blend of academic institutions and cultural landmarks, provides an ideal backdrop for our investigation of the relationship between air pollution and the quest for clandestine connections. The juxtaposition of idyllic landscapes with the allure of secrecy sets the stage for a captivating exploration.
Venturing into the digital realm, our study leverages the power of Google Trends, a treasure trove of search query data, to uncover patterns that may hold a key to understanding the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of environmental challenges. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which atmospheric contaminants may influence the virtual quests of the populace.
By unearthing the statistical associations between air pollution levels and the fervor of "CIA hotline" searches, our research offers a quirky yet meaningful contribution to the understanding of human responses to environmental cues. As we unravel the mysteries behind these seemingly disparate phenomena, we hope to inspire further investigations into the whimsical yet consequential impacts of air pollution on the human psyche.
In the following sections, we present our methodology, data analysis, and findings, inviting readers to embark on this lighthearted yet thought-provoking journey through the realms of air pollucia-tion and digital intrigue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and Google searches for the term "CIA hotline." The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7958318, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.6333482 further substantiates the significant association between air pollution and the public's interest in enigmatic communications. The statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the reliability of the correlation.

The findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Iowa City fluctuated over the years spanning 2004 to 2023, so did the frequency of Google searches for the mysterious "CIA hotline." This intriguing connection prompts a reevaluation of the potential influence of atmospheric contaminants on the public's online behavior.

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the compelling correlation between air pollution and "CIA hotline" searches, depicting a clear pattern of increasing search frequency with higher levels of air pollution. The alignment of these two variables on the scatterplot further emphasizes the strength of the observed association and accentuates the quirkiness of the study's findings.

Overall, our investigation not only uncovered a significant statistical relationship between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for the captivating term "CIA hotline" but also serves as a testament to the offbeat and unexpected influences of environmental factors on human behavior in the digital age.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and internet searches for the term "CIA hotline" using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. The research team found a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between atmospheric contaminants and the public's interest in clandestine communications. This paper offers new insights into the quirky ways in which environmental factors may influence internet search behavior, and calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have explored the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health and well-being. Smith et al. (2015) demonstrated the adverse effects of atmospheric contaminants on respiratory function, while Doe and Jones (2018) elucidated the cardiovascular risks associated with long-term exposure to air pollutants. However, the less conventional influence of air pollution on internet search behavior has received limited scholarly attention.
In "Air Quality and Online Behavior" by Davis and Brown (2017), the authors examine the relationship between particulate matter levels and keyword searches on online platforms. Their study identifies a subtle yet intriguing association between air pollution and the frequency of searches related to government agencies. Moreover, "The Digital Impacts of Air Pollution" by White and Green (2019) delves into the cognitive ramifications of environmental pollution, shedding light on the unanticipated ways in which polluted air may shape digital interactions. These studies provide a foundation for our exploration of the curious connection between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'CIA hotline'.
Expanding beyond academic research, non-fiction books such as "Choked: Life and Breath in the Age of Air Pollution" by Beth Gardiner and "This Is Your Brain on Air Pollution" by Gary W. Evans offer insightful perspectives on the far-reaching consequences of air pollution. These works not only provide valuable insights into the physiological impacts of air contaminants but also hint at the potential influence of pollution on cognitive processes and behavior.
Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Clandestine Connections" by A. Secretive and "Smoke Signals: A Tale of Internet Intrigue" by S. Earch delve into the enigmatic world of clandestine communications and digital mysteries. While these literary works are not empirical studies, they contribute to the narrative surrounding covert interactions and the allure of secrecy in the digital age.
Perhaps deviating slightly from conventional scholarly sources, the authors conducted a comprehensive review of unconventional sources, including the backs of shampoo bottles, fortune cookie messages, and the musings of particularly enigmatic pigeons in urban areas. While these sources may not conform to traditional academic standards, they provided unexpected and imaginative insights into the interplay of air pollution and enigmatic internet searches.
In essence, the literature surrounding the peculiar relationship between air pollution and Google searches for 'CIA hotline' reflects a merging of serious scholarly inquiry with quirky and at times whimsical narratives. This dynamic interplay sets the stage for our exploration of the unconventional yet thought-provoking connections between environmental factors and digital intrigue.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and Google searches for the term "CIA hotline." The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7958318, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.6333482 further substantiates the significant association between air pollution and the public's interest in enigmatic communications. The statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the reliability of the correlation.
The findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Iowa City fluctuated over the years spanning 2004 to 2023, so did the frequency of Google searches for the mysterious "CIA hotline." This intriguing connection prompts a reevaluation of the potential influence of atmospheric contaminants on the public's online behavior.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the compelling correlation between air pollution and "CIA hotline" searches, depicting a clear pattern of increasing search frequency with higher levels of air pollution. The alignment of these two variables on the scatterplot further emphasizes the strength of the observed association and accentuates the quirkiness of the study's findings.
Overall, our investigation not only uncovered a significant statistical relationship between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for the captivating term "CIA hotline" but also serves as a testament to the offbeat and unexpected influences of environmental factors on human behavior in the digital age.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust positive correlation uncovered in our study between air pollution levels in Iowa City and Google searches for the cryptic term "CIA hotline" lends credence to the whimsical yet thought-provoking notion that atmospheric contaminants may indeed shape digital intrigue. By extending the findings of previous research, which has hitherto focused on the physiological impacts of air pollution, our study highlights the unanticipated cognitive impacts of polluted air on internet search behavior.

Our results align with the work of Davis and Brown (2017), who first hinted at the subtle association between air pollution and keyword searches related to government agencies. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 in our study validates and extends this prior research, affirming a strong link between air pollution and the public's interest in clandestine communication channels such as the "CIA hotline." The r-squared value of 0.6333482 underscores the reliability of this association, further bolstering the evidence for the influence of environmental factors on digital interactions.

Intriguingly, our findings also resonate with the unconventional insights gleaned from non-traditional sources in the literature review, such as the musings of enigmatic pigeons. The unexpected alignment of air pollution levels and searches for the "CIA hotline" prompts reflection on the peculiar and intricate ways in which external environmental factors may shape online behavior. Moreover, while our study delves into the quirkier side of human curiosity, it substantiates the conceptual underpinnings of the "smoke signals" and "clandestine connections" portrayed in literary works, thereby blurring the lines between empirical inquiry and fictional narratives.

The visualization of the correlation through the scatterplot in Fig. 1 not only accentuates the statistical significance of our findings but also underscores the quirky and offbeat nature of the observed relationship. The compelling alignment of air pollution levels and "CIA hotline" searches on the scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the unexpected and unconventional ways in which atmospheric contaminants may shape digital intrigue.

Ultimately, our study contributes to the evolving narrative surrounding the multifaceted impacts of air pollution, shedding light on the intriguing yet hitherto overlooked influence of atmospheric contaminants on digital behaviors. The observed correlation calls for further exploration of the quirky and enigmatic ways in which environmental factors may intertwine with human curiosity in the digital realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for 'cia hotline'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and internet searches for the term "CIA hotline" using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. The research team found a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between atmospheric contaminants and the public's interest in clandestine communications. This paper offers new insights into the quirky ways in which environmental factors may influence internet search behavior, and calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Air pollution has long been recognized as a serious public health concern, with detrimental effects on respiratory health, cardiovascular function, and overall well-being. However, the impact of air pollution on more clandestine matters such as internet search behavior has been less explored. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar world of online queries and attempt to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for the intriguing term "CIA hotline."
The state of Iowa is known for its sprawling cornfields, friendly residents, and, apparently, a curious interest in covert communication. Meanwhile, Iowa City, with its charming blend of academic institutions and cultural landmarks, provides an ideal backdrop for our investigation of the relationship between air pollution and the quest for clandestine connections. The juxtaposition of idyllic landscapes with the allure of secrecy sets the stage for a captivating exploration.
Venturing into the digital realm, our study leverages the power of Google Trends, a treasure trove of search query data, to uncover patterns that may hold a key to understanding the peculiarities of human behavior in the face of environmental challenges. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which atmospheric contaminants may influence the virtual quests of the populace.
By unearthing the statistical associations between air pollution levels and the fervor of "CIA hotline" searches, our research offers a quirky yet meaningful contribution to the understanding of human responses to environmental cues. As we unravel the mysteries behind these seemingly disparate phenomena, we hope to inspire further investigations into the whimsical yet consequential impacts of air pollution on the human psyche.
In the following sections, we present our methodology, data analysis, and findings, inviting readers to embark on this lighthearted yet thought-provoking journey through the realms of air pollucia-tion and digital intrigue.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and Google searches for the term "CIA hotline." The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7958318, indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.6333482 further substantiates the significant association between air pollution and the public's interest in enigmatic communications. The statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the reliability of the correlation.
The findings suggest that as air pollution levels in Iowa City fluctuated over the years spanning 2004 to 2023, so did the frequency of Google searches for the mysterious "CIA hotline." This intriguing connection prompts a reevaluation of the potential influence of atmospheric contaminants on the public's online behavior.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the compelling correlation between air pollution and "CIA hotline" searches, depicting a clear pattern of increasing search frequency with higher levels of air pollution. The alignment of these two variables on the scatterplot further emphasizes the strength of the observed association and accentuates the quirkiness of the study's findings.
Overall, our investigation not only uncovered a significant statistical relationship between air pollution in Iowa City and Google searches for the captivating term "CIA hotline" but also serves as a testament to the offbeat and unexpected influences of environmental factors on human behavior in the digital age.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study illuminates an intriguing connection between air pollution in Iowa City and the public's fascination with clandestine communications, as evidenced by Google searches for the enigmatic "CIA hotline." The robust positive correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01), points to the whimsical yet significant influence of atmospheric contaminants on the virtual quests of the populace.

The juxtaposition of serene cornfields and the allure of secrecy in Iowa sets the stage for this lighthearted yet thought-provoking journey through the realms of air pollucia-tion and digital intrigue. As we unraveled the statistical associations between air pollution levels and the fervor of "CIA hotline" searches, our research offers a whimsical yet meaningful contribution to the understanding of human responses to environmental cues.

The scatterplot, with its clear pattern of increasing search frequency with higher levels of air pollution, serves as a visual testament to the offbeat and unexpected influences of environmental factors on human behavior in the digital age. It provides a quirky yet captivating visualization of the convergence of air pollution and online intrigue.

The findings of this study promote a reevaluation of the potential impact of atmospheric contaminants on the public's online behavior and highlight the need to embrace the quirks of human curiosity, even in the face of environmental challenges. Our research calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution while adding a touch of whimsy to the scholarly discourse on the societal impacts of pollution.

Having unraveled this enigmatic connection, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. This study stands as a testament to the power of scientific inquiry in uncovering the unexpected and adds a dash of intrigue to the traditionally solemn field of environmental research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Pollucia-tion: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Iowa City and Google Searches for 'CIA Hotline' with an abstract of This study investigates the correlation between air pollution levels in Iowa City and internet searches for the term "CIA hotline" using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends. The research team found a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7958318 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2004 to 2023. Our findings suggest a potential link between atmospheric contaminants and the public's interest in clandestine communications. This paper offers new insights into the quirky ways in which environmental factors may influence internet search behavior, and calls for further exploration of the cognitive impacts of air pollution.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, iowa city, cia hotline, google searches, correlation, environmental protection agency, google trends, atmospheric contaminants, clandestine communications, internet search behavior, cognitive impacts

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Iowa City
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Iowa City, IA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Iowa City

Google searches for 'cia hotline'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'cia hotline' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'cia hotline'

Correlation r = 0.7958318 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6333482 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'cia hotline') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Iowa City) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-5. 0.0000271578773279465420000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.0027% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36,822 random variables You don't actually need 36 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air pollution in Iowa City (Bad air quality days)2.459024.098360.8333331.506020.5747130.5617981.09589000.2739730.2747250.27397300000.2762430.5494510.2739732.1978
Google searches for 'cia hotline' (Rel. search volume)15.166711.754.083332.08333112.333331.166671.083330.6666670.3333331.251.251.250.50.750.58333311.166671.4




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.45902,4.09836,0.833333,1.50602,0.574713,0.561798,1.09589,0,0,0.273973,0.274725,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0.276243,0.549451,0.273973,2.1978,])
array_2 = np.array([15.1667,11.75,4.08333,2.08333,1,1,2.33333,1.16667,1.08333,0.666667,0.333333,1.25,1.25,1.25,0.5,0.75,0.583333,1,1.16667,1.4,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Iowa City"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'cia hotline'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1939 · Black Variable ID: 20741 · Red Variable ID: 1394
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0