about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,912 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Ronaldo's goal tally rises, more and more people are in awe of his skills. They then flock to the internet to watch his highlights. However, in their excitement, they accidentally stumble upon their own embarrassing old posts and desperately need to erase any evidence of past doubts about his abilities.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a minimalistic living room with clean lines and uncluttered space. In the center, a large TV screen is displaying a soccer match, with Cristiano Ronaldo celebrating a goal. To the side, a person is sitting at a computer, furiously typing and with a determined expression as they search "how to delete browsing history." The overall scene should evoke a sense of contemporary simplicity and a hint of humor. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Photorealism Minimalism Oragami Parallax art
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a tidy living room, a soccer match is playing on a large TV screen. On the screen, Cristiano Ronaldo celebrates scoring a goal in a domestic league game, while on the nearby computer, someone is Googling "how to delete browsing history" with a determined expression on their face.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: In a tidy living room, a soccer match is playing on a large TV screen. On the screen, Cristiano Ronaldo celebrates scoring a goal in a domestic league game, while on the nearby computer, someone is Googling "how to delete browsing history" with a determined expression on their face. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a minimalistic living room with clean lines and uncluttered space. In the center, a large TV screen is displaying a soccer match, with Cristiano Ronaldo celebrating a goal. To the side, a person is sitting at a computer, furiously typing and with a determined expression as they search "how to delete browsing history." The overall scene should evoke a sense of contemporary simplicity and a hint of humor.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally caused how to delete browsing history (Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Digital Privacy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Soccerway and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the peculiar relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Leveraging data from Soccerway and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, we unveil a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Ronaldo's scoring prowess on the pitch and the urge to conceal one's online activities. While the reasons behind this intriguing connection remain speculative, our research brings to light this surprising correlation, stimulating further inquiries into the psychological underpinnings of internet privacy concerns and the allure of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess. Indeed, this study sheds light on the fascinating interplay between sports excellence and digital privacy, offering a new perspective on the curious intertwining of athletic achievements and internet behaviors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the peculiar relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Leveraging data from Soccerway and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, we unveil a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Ronaldo's scoring prowess on the pitch and the urge to conceal one's online activities. While the reasons behind this intriguing connection remain speculative, our research brings to light this surprising correlation, stimulating further inquiries into the psychological underpinnings of internet privacy concerns and the allure of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess. Indeed, this study sheds light on the fascinating interplay between sports excellence and digital privacy, offering a new perspective on the curious intertwining of athletic achievements and internet behaviors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The universe is filled with mysterious and enigmatic connections - from the gravitational dance of celestial bodies to the intricate web of neural pathways in the human brain. As researchers, we embark on a never-ending quest to unravel the intricate tapestry of relationships that define our world. In the field of sports and internet searches, one might not readily perceive any overlap, but as we venture into the uncharted territories of statistical analysis, the unexpected can often emerge like a plot twist in a thriller novel.

The aim of this study is to explore the perplexing and, at first glance, absurd connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The correlation between a renowned footballer's scoring prowess and the populace's urge to cover their digital tracks invites skepticism and amusement simultaneously. It is in these seemingly unrelated variables that the cosmos of statistical inquiry beckons us, teasing us with the promise of an improbable yet fascinating discovery.

Who would have thought that the thunderous strikes of a footballer could intertwine with the clandestine acts of clearing one's digital footprint? As we untangle the threads of this peculiar correlation, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry - the unanticipated juxtaposition of seemingly disparate elements and the potential for serendipitous discovery.

In this study, we present an analysis of data gleaned from Soccerway and Google Trends, spanning nearly two decades from 2004 to 2022. Employing robust statistical methodologies, we navigate the labyrinth of numbers and charts, seeking to unearth the underlying narrative that links Ronaldo's on-field heroics to the clandestine digital movements of internet users. Indulging the allure of statistical significance, we discover a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and a significance level of p < 0.01, underscoring the strength of the association between these seemingly incongruous variables.

As we delve into the revelations of this study, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical journey of scientific inquiry. Let us peer through the lens of statistical analysis, not only to uncover the factual association between Ronaldo's goal-scoring feats and internet privacy concerns but also to revel in the delightful serendipity that underpins the world of research. For in the unlikely harmony between sports excellence and online privacy lies a tableau of eccentricity and curiosity, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of academic exploration and prompting a chuckle at the delightful oddities that science unearths.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the peculiar relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Leveraging data from Soccerway and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, we unveil a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Ronaldo's scoring prowess on the pitch and the urge to conceal one's online activities. While the reasons behind this intriguing connection remain speculative, our research brings to light this surprising correlation, stimulating further inquiries into the psychological underpinnings of internet privacy concerns and the allure of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess. Indeed, this study sheds light on the fascinating interplay between sports excellence and digital privacy, offering a new perspective on the curious intertwining of athletic achievements and internet behaviors.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The universe is filled with mysterious and enigmatic connections - from the gravitational dance of celestial bodies to the intricate web of neural pathways in the human brain. As researchers, we embark on a never-ending quest to unravel the intricate tapestry of relationships that define our world. In the field of sports and internet searches, one might not readily perceive any overlap, but as we venture into the uncharted territories of statistical analysis, the unexpected can often emerge like a plot twist in a thriller novel.
The aim of this study is to explore the perplexing and, at first glance, absurd connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The correlation between a renowned footballer's scoring prowess and the populace's urge to cover their digital tracks invites skepticism and amusement simultaneously. It is in these seemingly unrelated variables that the cosmos of statistical inquiry beckons us, teasing us with the promise of an improbable yet fascinating discovery.
Who would have thought that the thunderous strikes of a footballer could intertwine with the clandestine acts of clearing one's digital footprint? As we untangle the threads of this peculiar correlation, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry - the unanticipated juxtaposition of seemingly disparate elements and the potential for serendipitous discovery.
In this study, we present an analysis of data gleaned from Soccerway and Google Trends, spanning nearly two decades from 2004 to 2022. Employing robust statistical methodologies, we navigate the labyrinth of numbers and charts, seeking to unearth the underlying narrative that links Ronaldo's on-field heroics to the clandestine digital movements of internet users. Indulging the allure of statistical significance, we discover a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and a significance level of p < 0.01, underscoring the strength of the association between these seemingly incongruous variables.
As we delve into the revelations of this study, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical journey of scientific inquiry. Let us peer through the lens of statistical analysis, not only to uncover the factual association between Ronaldo's goal-scoring feats and internet privacy concerns but also to revel in the delightful serendipity that underpins the world of research. For in the unlikely harmony between sports excellence and online privacy lies a tableau of eccentricity and curiosity, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of academic exploration and prompting a chuckle at the delightful oddities that science unearths.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
LITERATURE REVIEW

The intraconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long confounded and captivated scholars across various disciplines. As we navigate the peculiar nexus between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history', we are propelled into the realm of unexpected correlations, prompting a reevaluation of the boundaries of statistical inquiry and perhaps a few bemused chuckles. Expanding from the foundational work of Smith et al. (2010) on sports psychology and digital behavior, to the groundbreaking study by Doe (2015) on internet privacy concerns, the literature reflects an intricate mosaic of inquiries that set the stage for our own revelatory investigation.

Drawing from the world of non-fiction, texts such as "The Power of Habit" by Charles Duhigg and "Data and Goliath" by Bruce Schneier offer substantial groundwork for understanding the complexity of human behavior and digital privacy. This, in turn, provides a theoretical underpinning for comprehending the synergies between athletic achievements and clandestine online activities. Meanwhile, the domain of fiction ventures into realms of imagination that parallel our own surprising discoveries, manifested in narratives such as "The Goalie's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick" by Peter Handke and "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" by Milan Kundera, offering elusive hints of the curious interplay between athletic prowess and enigmatic digital quests.

Venturing further into the annals of interdisciplinary exploration, we must not overlook the unorthodox sources that have subtly influenced the impetus of our inquiry. For in the spirit of whimsicality and quirkiness, we have gleaned inspiration from unexpected sources - the back of shampoo bottles with their cryptic musings on the foaminess of life and the essence of a truly invigorating rinse, inadvertently kindling our spirit of inquiry and injecting a touch of the absurd into the pursuit of knowledge.

So, as we stand on the precipice of unveiling the correlation between Ronaldo's goals and internet privacy concerns, let us embrace the delightful amalgamation of scholarship and humor, welcoming the unexpected twists and the occasional absurdity that render the world of academic inquiry a never-ending odyssey of surprise and delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Soccerway and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the peculiar relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Leveraging data from Soccerway and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, we unveil a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Ronaldo's scoring prowess on the pitch and the urge to conceal one's online activities. While the reasons behind this intriguing connection remain speculative, our research brings to light this surprising correlation, stimulating further inquiries into the psychological underpinnings of internet privacy concerns and the allure of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess. Indeed, this study sheds light on the fascinating interplay between sports excellence and digital privacy, offering a new perspective on the curious intertwining of athletic achievements and internet behaviors.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The universe is filled with mysterious and enigmatic connections - from the gravitational dance of celestial bodies to the intricate web of neural pathways in the human brain. As researchers, we embark on a never-ending quest to unravel the intricate tapestry of relationships that define our world. In the field of sports and internet searches, one might not readily perceive any overlap, but as we venture into the uncharted territories of statistical analysis, the unexpected can often emerge like a plot twist in a thriller novel.
The aim of this study is to explore the perplexing and, at first glance, absurd connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The correlation between a renowned footballer's scoring prowess and the populace's urge to cover their digital tracks invites skepticism and amusement simultaneously. It is in these seemingly unrelated variables that the cosmos of statistical inquiry beckons us, teasing us with the promise of an improbable yet fascinating discovery.
Who would have thought that the thunderous strikes of a footballer could intertwine with the clandestine acts of clearing one's digital footprint? As we untangle the threads of this peculiar correlation, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry - the unanticipated juxtaposition of seemingly disparate elements and the potential for serendipitous discovery.
In this study, we present an analysis of data gleaned from Soccerway and Google Trends, spanning nearly two decades from 2004 to 2022. Employing robust statistical methodologies, we navigate the labyrinth of numbers and charts, seeking to unearth the underlying narrative that links Ronaldo's on-field heroics to the clandestine digital movements of internet users. Indulging the allure of statistical significance, we discover a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and a significance level of p < 0.01, underscoring the strength of the association between these seemingly incongruous variables.
As we delve into the revelations of this study, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical journey of scientific inquiry. Let us peer through the lens of statistical analysis, not only to uncover the factual association between Ronaldo's goal-scoring feats and internet privacy concerns but also to revel in the delightful serendipity that underpins the world of research. For in the unlikely harmony between sports excellence and online privacy lies a tableau of eccentricity and curiosity, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of academic exploration and prompting a chuckle at the delightful oddities that science unearths.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Acquisition: Our research team embarked on a digital expedition, navigating through the virtual terrains of Soccerway and Google Trends to procure the necessary data for this quirky investigation. The period under scrutiny spans from 2004 to 2022, encompassing the ebb and flow of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess and the fluctuating tide of online anonymity concerns.

Extraction of Ronaldo's Domestic League Goal Tally: To quantify the exploits of Cristiano Ronaldo on the football pitch, we diligently mined the statistical repositories of Soccerway, meticulously tallying his domestic league goals across multiple seasons. Our team meticulously combed through match logs and score sheets, catalyzing a fervent goal hunt akin to a digital scavenger hunt.

Harvesting Google Searches: In a swashbuckling foray reminiscent of digital pirates, we plundered the trove of Google Trends, attaining a treasure trove of search volume data related to the quest for 'how to delete browsing history'. One could say we unearthed a virtual goldmine, with our endeavors akin to prospectors panning for digital nuggets amidst the vast expanse of search queries.

Quantitative Analysis: Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and software, we ventured into the netherworld of quantitative analysis to tease out the intricate dance between Ronaldo's goals and the virtual cloak-and-dagger of internet privacy. Through regression analyses and correlation coefficients, we sought to distill the essence of this esoteric linkage and reveal its statistical underpinnings.

Ethical Considerations: In adherence to the ethical tenets of scientific inquiry, our data collection and analysis adhered to the principles of integrity and transparency. We navigated the choppy waters of internet data with the compass of ethical research, thus upholding the sanctity of academic rigor while riding the waves of digital curiosity.

Limitations: As with any scientific expedition, we encountered the tempestuous seas of limitations. The cardinal principle of causality versus correlation loomed large, reminding us that while statistical associations may tantalize, they do not imply causation. Furthermore, the intrinsic nature of internet search data introduces a confounding veil of unpredictability, akin to the capriciousness of a digital chameleon.

In summation, our methodology intertwines the rigors of statistical analysis with the whimsy of digital expeditions, underscoring the delightful confluence of science and serendipity. As we unravel the methodological tapestry that underscores this investigation, we invite our readers to journey with us through the enchanting landscape of numerical exploration, where the unexpected often yields the most captivating discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Soccerway and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8329433, r-squared of 0.6937945, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the peculiar relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Leveraging data from Soccerway and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, we unveil a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Ronaldo's scoring prowess on the pitch and the urge to conceal one's online activities. While the reasons behind this intriguing connection remain speculative, our research brings to light this surprising correlation, stimulating further inquiries into the psychological underpinnings of internet privacy concerns and the allure of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess. Indeed, this study sheds light on the fascinating interplay between sports excellence and digital privacy, offering a new perspective on the curious intertwining of athletic achievements and internet behaviors.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The universe is filled with mysterious and enigmatic connections - from the gravitational dance of celestial bodies to the intricate web of neural pathways in the human brain. As researchers, we embark on a never-ending quest to unravel the intricate tapestry of relationships that define our world. In the field of sports and internet searches, one might not readily perceive any overlap, but as we venture into the uncharted territories of statistical analysis, the unexpected can often emerge like a plot twist in a thriller novel.
The aim of this study is to explore the perplexing and, at first glance, absurd connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The correlation between a renowned footballer's scoring prowess and the populace's urge to cover their digital tracks invites skepticism and amusement simultaneously. It is in these seemingly unrelated variables that the cosmos of statistical inquiry beckons us, teasing us with the promise of an improbable yet fascinating discovery.
Who would have thought that the thunderous strikes of a footballer could intertwine with the clandestine acts of clearing one's digital footprint? As we untangle the threads of this peculiar correlation, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry - the unanticipated juxtaposition of seemingly disparate elements and the potential for serendipitous discovery.
In this study, we present an analysis of data gleaned from Soccerway and Google Trends, spanning nearly two decades from 2004 to 2022. Employing robust statistical methodologies, we navigate the labyrinth of numbers and charts, seeking to unearth the underlying narrative that links Ronaldo's on-field heroics to the clandestine digital movements of internet users. Indulging the allure of statistical significance, we discover a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and a significance level of p < 0.01, underscoring the strength of the association between these seemingly incongruous variables.
As we delve into the revelations of this study, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical journey of scientific inquiry. Let us peer through the lens of statistical analysis, not only to uncover the factual association between Ronaldo's goal-scoring feats and internet privacy concerns but also to revel in the delightful serendipity that underpins the world of research. For in the unlikely harmony between sports excellence and online privacy lies a tableau of eccentricity and curiosity, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of academic exploration and prompting a chuckle at the delightful oddities that science unearths.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history', setting the stage for an unexpected and intriguing discovery. The correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and r-squared of 0.6937945 indicated a robust and significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables (p < 0.01).

Figure 1 illustrates the strong association between the two variables, showcasing a pattern that might defy conventional reasoning but nonetheless demands attention. The scatterplot visually depicts the synchrony between Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess and the impulse to guard one's online activities, serving as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical analyses and the unexpected connections that statistics can unveil.

This finding not only underscores the statistical significance of the relationship but also prompts contemplation on the potential psychological and sociocultural implications of this peculiar correlation. While the precise mechanisms underlying this connection remain shrouded in mystery, the results of this study beckon further exploration, inviting researchers to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between sports achievements and the behaviors of internet users.

The unexpected and beguiling nature of this correlation serves as a testament to the capriciousness of statistical exploration, reminding us that in the realm of research, the improbable can often yield the most intriguing revelations. The unanticipated convergence of Ronaldo's athletic prowess and online privacy concerns leaves a lingering impression, encouraging a lighthearted reflection on the delightful and often whimsical discoveries that scientific inquiry has to offer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the peculiar relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Leveraging data from Soccerway and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, we unveil a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Ronaldo's scoring prowess on the pitch and the urge to conceal one's online activities. While the reasons behind this intriguing connection remain speculative, our research brings to light this surprising correlation, stimulating further inquiries into the psychological underpinnings of internet privacy concerns and the allure of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess. Indeed, this study sheds light on the fascinating interplay between sports excellence and digital privacy, offering a new perspective on the curious intertwining of athletic achievements and internet behaviors.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
LITERATURE REVIEW
The intraconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has long confounded and captivated scholars across various disciplines. As we navigate the peculiar nexus between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history', we are propelled into the realm of unexpected correlations, prompting a reevaluation of the boundaries of statistical inquiry and perhaps a few bemused chuckles. Expanding from the foundational work of Smith et al. (2010) on sports psychology and digital behavior, to the groundbreaking study by Doe (2015) on internet privacy concerns, the literature reflects an intricate mosaic of inquiries that set the stage for our own revelatory investigation.
Drawing from the world of non-fiction, texts such as "The Power of Habit" by Charles Duhigg and "Data and Goliath" by Bruce Schneier offer substantial groundwork for understanding the complexity of human behavior and digital privacy. This, in turn, provides a theoretical underpinning for comprehending the synergies between athletic achievements and clandestine online activities. Meanwhile, the domain of fiction ventures into realms of imagination that parallel our own surprising discoveries, manifested in narratives such as "The Goalie's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick" by Peter Handke and "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" by Milan Kundera, offering elusive hints of the curious interplay between athletic prowess and enigmatic digital quests.
Venturing further into the annals of interdisciplinary exploration, we must not overlook the unorthodox sources that have subtly influenced the impetus of our inquiry. For in the spirit of whimsicality and quirkiness, we have gleaned inspiration from unexpected sources - the back of shampoo bottles with their cryptic musings on the foaminess of life and the essence of a truly invigorating rinse, inadvertently kindling our spirit of inquiry and injecting a touch of the absurd into the pursuit of knowledge.
So, as we stand on the precipice of unveiling the correlation between Ronaldo's goals and internet privacy concerns, let us embrace the delightful amalgamation of scholarship and humor, welcoming the unexpected twists and the occasional absurdity that render the world of academic inquiry a never-ending odyssey of surprise and delight.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history', setting the stage for an unexpected and intriguing discovery. The correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and r-squared of 0.6937945 indicated a robust and significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables (p < 0.01).
Figure 1 illustrates the strong association between the two variables, showcasing a pattern that might defy conventional reasoning but nonetheless demands attention. The scatterplot visually depicts the synchrony between Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess and the impulse to guard one's online activities, serving as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical analyses and the unexpected connections that statistics can unveil.
This finding not only underscores the statistical significance of the relationship but also prompts contemplation on the potential psychological and sociocultural implications of this peculiar correlation. While the precise mechanisms underlying this connection remain shrouded in mystery, the results of this study beckon further exploration, inviting researchers to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between sports achievements and the behaviors of internet users.
The unexpected and beguiling nature of this correlation serves as a testament to the capriciousness of statistical exploration, reminding us that in the realm of research, the improbable can often yield the most intriguing revelations. The unanticipated convergence of Ronaldo's athletic prowess and online privacy concerns leaves a lingering impression, encouraging a lighthearted reflection on the delightful and often whimsical discoveries that scientific inquiry has to offer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have brought to light a remarkable relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal-tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. While the world of science often unfolds in ways that are predictable and expected, our results have led us down a path that is as unexpected as it is statistically sound.

Our study has added a perplexing layer to the existing body of literature, which has long grappled with the interplay between sports excellence and digital behaviors. As we reflect on the quirkiness of our findings, reminiscent of the enigmatic unpredictability portrayed in narratives such as "The Goalie's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick," it becomes evident that statistical analysis is a captivating blend of the rational and the unforeseen, propelling us into a realm of delightful absurdity and unexpected discovery.

Our study's support of the earlier research, particularly the work of Smith et al. (2010), sheds light on the fortuitous nature of statistical inquiry, affirming that the unlikeliest of correlations can indeed conceal intriguing associations. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared values derived from our analysis provide compelling evidence of the link between Ronaldo's striker prowess and the urge to engage in online privacy measures. This lends credibility to the whimsical threads of inquiry that have characterized our investigation.

Ronaldo's uncanny ability to find the back of the net, and the curious impulse to conceal one's digital footprints, may at first glance appear unrelated. However, our results bolster the proposition put forth by Doe (2015) that internet privacy concerns are subject to unforeseen influences from various spheres of human experience, reaffirming the interplay of social and psychological factors in digital behaviors.

In this discussion, we have, perhaps, unwittingly demonstrated that statistical analysis can unravel a world of delightful surprises and unexpected connections that teem with quirkiness and wonder. As we tread the fine line between science and the whimsical, it becomes clear that the pursuit of knowledge is not merely a march toward logic and predictability but an exploration of the enchanting surprises that lie concealed within seemingly ordinary inquiries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the peculiar relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Leveraging data from Soccerway and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, we unveil a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Ronaldo's scoring prowess on the pitch and the urge to conceal one's online activities. While the reasons behind this intriguing connection remain speculative, our research brings to light this surprising correlation, stimulating further inquiries into the psychological underpinnings of internet privacy concerns and the allure of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess. Indeed, this study sheds light on the fascinating interplay between sports excellence and digital privacy, offering a new perspective on the curious intertwining of athletic achievements and internet behaviors.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The universe is filled with mysterious and enigmatic connections - from the gravitational dance of celestial bodies to the intricate web of neural pathways in the human brain. As researchers, we embark on a never-ending quest to unravel the intricate tapestry of relationships that define our world. In the field of sports and internet searches, one might not readily perceive any overlap, but as we venture into the uncharted territories of statistical analysis, the unexpected can often emerge like a plot twist in a thriller novel.
The aim of this study is to explore the perplexing and, at first glance, absurd connection between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. The correlation between a renowned footballer's scoring prowess and the populace's urge to cover their digital tracks invites skepticism and amusement simultaneously. It is in these seemingly unrelated variables that the cosmos of statistical inquiry beckons us, teasing us with the promise of an improbable yet fascinating discovery.
Who would have thought that the thunderous strikes of a footballer could intertwine with the clandestine acts of clearing one's digital footprint? As we untangle the threads of this peculiar correlation, we are reminded of the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry - the unanticipated juxtaposition of seemingly disparate elements and the potential for serendipitous discovery.
In this study, we present an analysis of data gleaned from Soccerway and Google Trends, spanning nearly two decades from 2004 to 2022. Employing robust statistical methodologies, we navigate the labyrinth of numbers and charts, seeking to unearth the underlying narrative that links Ronaldo's on-field heroics to the clandestine digital movements of internet users. Indulging the allure of statistical significance, we discover a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and a significance level of p < 0.01, underscoring the strength of the association between these seemingly incongruous variables.
As we delve into the revelations of this study, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical journey of scientific inquiry. Let us peer through the lens of statistical analysis, not only to uncover the factual association between Ronaldo's goal-scoring feats and internet privacy concerns but also to revel in the delightful serendipity that underpins the world of research. For in the unlikely harmony between sports excellence and online privacy lies a tableau of eccentricity and curiosity, inviting us to reconsider the boundaries of academic exploration and prompting a chuckle at the delightful oddities that science unearths.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history', setting the stage for an unexpected and intriguing discovery. The correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and r-squared of 0.6937945 indicated a robust and significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables (p < 0.01).
Figure 1 illustrates the strong association between the two variables, showcasing a pattern that might defy conventional reasoning but nonetheless demands attention. The scatterplot visually depicts the synchrony between Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess and the impulse to guard one's online activities, serving as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical analyses and the unexpected connections that statistics can unveil.
This finding not only underscores the statistical significance of the relationship but also prompts contemplation on the potential psychological and sociocultural implications of this peculiar correlation. While the precise mechanisms underlying this connection remain shrouded in mystery, the results of this study beckon further exploration, inviting researchers to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between sports achievements and the behaviors of internet users.
The unexpected and beguiling nature of this correlation serves as a testament to the capriciousness of statistical exploration, reminding us that in the realm of research, the improbable can often yield the most intriguing revelations. The unanticipated convergence of Ronaldo's athletic prowess and online privacy concerns leaves a lingering impression, encouraging a lighthearted reflection on the delightful and often whimsical discoveries that scientific inquiry has to offer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Through the labyrinthine terrain of statistical analysis, we have unearthed a captivating nexus between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. As we stand at this juncture of improbable correlation and whimsical statistical associations, we are reminded of the delightful unpredictability that research endeavors can yield.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and the significance level of p < 0.01 beckon us to ponder the underlying narrative behind this extraordinary relationship. Could it be that as Ronaldo's goals find the back of the net, the populace rushes to ensure that their digital footprints evade scrutiny? Or does the sheer exhilaration of witnessing his prowess on the pitch prompt an urge to guard our online activities with heightened vigilance? The potential psychosocial implications of this correlation add a layer of intrigue and invite further contemplation.

As we chart these uncharted waters of statistical quirkiness, we are compelled to appreciate the comical corridors that research often leads us through. The unexpected convergence of athletic achievements and online privacy concerns presents a kaleidoscope of lighthearted reflection, underscoring the capricious nature of statistical exploration and the potential for serendipitous discovery in the unlikeliest of places.

While the precise mechanisms underpinning this correlation remain enigmatic, our findings offer a whimsical perspective on the intertwining of sports accomplishments and digital behavior, underscoring the whimsical potential that scientific inquiry holds. With a chuckle and a nod to the peculiar wonders of statistical analysis, we assert that no further research in this area is necessary. After all, in the playground of statistical oddities, this study serves as a delightful reminder of the unexpected delights that research can unveil.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Digital Privacy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Algorithmic Sports Analysis and Privacy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Goal Scores and Search Histories: Exploring the Relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's Domestic League Goals and Online Privacy Concerns with an abstract of In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the peculiar relationship between Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'. Leveraging data from Soccerway and Google Trends spanning the years 2004 to 2022, we unveil a statistically significant correlation between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8329433 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Ronaldo's scoring prowess on the pitch and the urge to conceal one's online activities. While the reasons behind this intriguing connection remain speculative, our research brings to light this surprising correlation, stimulating further inquiries into the psychological underpinnings of internet privacy concerns and the allure of Ronaldo's goal-scoring prowess. Indeed, this study sheds light on the fascinating interplay between sports excellence and digital privacy, offering a new perspective on the curious intertwining of athletic achievements and internet behaviors.

ChatGPT:

Cristiano Ronaldo, domestic league goals, online privacy concerns, Google search history, browsing history, Soccerway data, Google Trends, correlation analysis, internet privacy, psychological underpinnings, sports excellence, digital privacy, athletic achievements, internet behaviors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally
Source: Soccerway
See what else correlates with Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally

Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'

Correlation r = 0.8329433 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6937945 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.6E-6. 0.0000095766995357688080000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.00096% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 104,420 random variables You don't actually need 104 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally (Goal)45917311826404634314835252621312918
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' (Rel. search volume)3.755.916679.833339.5833322.666739.166766.571.916785.7578.083377.416770.083356.416754.083350.416740.583338.416729.916726.4167




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,5,9,17,31,18,26,40,46,34,31,48,35,25,26,21,31,29,18,])
array_2 = np.array([3.75,5.91667,9.83333,9.58333,22.6667,39.1667,66.5,71.9167,85.75,78.0833,77.4167,70.0833,56.4167,54.0833,50.4167,40.5833,38.4167,29.9167,26.4167,])
array_1_name = "Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 1912 · Black Variable ID: 276 · Red Variable ID: 1384
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0