about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,897 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and the second variable is Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As hydropower decreased, there were fewer nuts in the power grid, leading to a calmer squirrel population with less energy for mayhem. Those squirrels were just going with the flow!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an illustration combining the style of a TIME magazine cover image with the following scene: In a tranquil village nestled in the Tunisian countryside, a magnificent waterfall tumbles down a rugged cliff, while a robust hydroelectric dam utilizes the surging water to produce sustainable power. Nearby, a cluster of inquisitive villagers gather around a smartphone, fervently typing "attacked by a squirrel" into a search engine, their faces reflecting a blend of astonishment and amusement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Cybernetic art A TIME magazine cover image Cubism Magic realism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quaint village in Tunisia, a majestic waterfall cascades down a rocky cliff, with a powerful hydroelectric dam harnessing the rushing water to generate clean energy. Meanwhile, nearby, a group of curious villagers huddle around a smartphone, frantically typing "attacked by a squirrel" into their search engine, their expressions a mix of disbelief and amusement.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a quaint village in Tunisia, a majestic waterfall cascades down a rocky cliff, with a powerful hydroelectric dam harnessing the rushing water to generate clean energy. Meanwhile, nearby, a group of curious villagers huddle around a smartphone, frantically typing "attacked by a squirrel" into their search engine, their expressions a mix of disbelief and amusement. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an illustration combining the style of a TIME magazine cover image with the following scene: In a tranquil village nestled in the Tunisian countryside, a magnificent waterfall tumbles down a rugged cliff, while a robust hydroelectric dam utilizes the surging water to produce sustainable power. Nearby, a cluster of inquisitive villagers gather around a smartphone, fervently typing "attacked by a squirrel" into a search engine, their faces reflecting a blend of astonishment and amusement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia caused attacked by a squirrel (Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches

The International Journal of Eclectic Energy Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pursuit of renewable energy sources has often led researchers down surprising paths, but none as unconventional as the relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Through data collected from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only illuminate the unusual interconnectedness of the world but also provide a quirky insight into the dynamics of human curiosity and online behavior. The implications of this research extend beyond the field of renewable energy and offer an amusing glimpse into the whimsical side of data analysis. Our study opens doors for further investigations into the unexpected connections that may exist within disparate datasets, reaffirming the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pursuit of renewable energy sources has often led researchers down surprising paths, but none as unconventional as the relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Through data collected from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only illuminate the unusual interconnectedness of the world but also provide a quirky insight into the dynamics of human curiosity and online behavior. The implications of this research extend beyond the field of renewable energy and offer an amusing glimpse into the whimsical side of data analysis. Our study opens doors for further investigations into the unexpected connections that may exist within disparate datasets, reaffirming the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

In the illustrious world of academic research, it is not unusual to encounter serendipitous discoveries that defy all conventional wisdom. From the peculiar mating rituals of fruit flies to the correlation between the price of bananas and GDP growth, researchers have long been accustomed to embracing the unexpected. However, as we delve into the realm of renewable energy and online search behavior, one correlation stands out as particularly whimsical—the intriguing connection between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". You read that right. Squirrels and renewable energy; two seemingly unrelated topics interconnected in a way that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.

It is almost as if the data itself is whispering humorous anecdotes, and we, as researchers, are nothing more than unwitting stand-up comedians in a scientific circus. The sheer unpredictability of these correlations becomes an exercise in creative interpretation, inspiring us to ponder the absurdity, err, I mean, fascinating nuances of our world and our quest for knowledge.

As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we have harnessed the power of research methodologies to not only uncover this quirky association but also to illuminate the human penchant for the bizarre and unexpected. Our investigation delves beyond the mere numbers and boldly steps into the realm of the absurd, all in the name of advancing scientific knowledge and perhaps eliciting a chuckle or two along the way.

With our tongues firmly in our cheek and our calculators at the ready, we present our findings that may just leave you questioning conventional wisdom and pondering the comically oddball aspects of human behavior. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic link between hydropower energy and squirrel-related anxieties, proving once and for all that in the realm of academia, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pursuit of renewable energy sources has often led researchers down surprising paths, but none as unconventional as the relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Through data collected from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only illuminate the unusual interconnectedness of the world but also provide a quirky insight into the dynamics of human curiosity and online behavior. The implications of this research extend beyond the field of renewable energy and offer an amusing glimpse into the whimsical side of data analysis. Our study opens doors for further investigations into the unexpected connections that may exist within disparate datasets, reaffirming the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious world of academic research, it is not unusual to encounter serendipitous discoveries that defy all conventional wisdom. From the peculiar mating rituals of fruit flies to the correlation between the price of bananas and GDP growth, researchers have long been accustomed to embracing the unexpected. However, as we delve into the realm of renewable energy and online search behavior, one correlation stands out as particularly whimsical—the intriguing connection between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". You read that right. Squirrels and renewable energy; two seemingly unrelated topics interconnected in a way that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.
It is almost as if the data itself is whispering humorous anecdotes, and we, as researchers, are nothing more than unwitting stand-up comedians in a scientific circus. The sheer unpredictability of these correlations becomes an exercise in creative interpretation, inspiring us to ponder the absurdity, err, I mean, fascinating nuances of our world and our quest for knowledge.
As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we have harnessed the power of research methodologies to not only uncover this quirky association but also to illuminate the human penchant for the bizarre and unexpected. Our investigation delves beyond the mere numbers and boldly steps into the realm of the absurd, all in the name of advancing scientific knowledge and perhaps eliciting a chuckle or two along the way.
With our tongues firmly in our cheek and our calculators at the ready, we present our findings that may just leave you questioning conventional wisdom and pondering the comically oddball aspects of human behavior. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic link between hydropower energy and squirrel-related anxieties, proving once and for all that in the realm of academia, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel" may seem like a whimsical and unfathomable connection, but as we delve into the existing literature, it becomes evident that the interplay of seemingly unrelated variables is not without precedent.

In their study, Smith et al. (2015) explored the unexpected intersection of renewable energy and peculiar internet search trends, albeit in a different context. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2017) delved into the complexities of online behavior and its implications for renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the intricate relationship between human curiosity and search engine queries. These seminal works provided a foundational understanding of internet search patterns and their potential connection to renewable energy dynamics, setting the stage for the unlikely correlation we explore in this paper.

To gain a multidisciplinary perspective, we turn to non-fiction literature that may offer insights into the unanticipated interplay between renewable energy and wildlife encounters. In "The Secret Life of Bees" by Sue Monk Kidd and "The Nature Principle" by Richard Louv, we find compelling narratives on the intricate coexistence of humans and nature, hinting at the possibility of unexpected interactions between renewable energy production and wildlife habits. Furthermore, "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert presents a sobering exploration of biodiversity loss, serving as a somber reminder of the delicate balance between human activities and the natural world.

Before we venture into the realm of outright whimsy, it is worth considering the potential influence of fictional works on our understanding of human behavior and its manifestation in online search patterns. In "Watership Down" by Richard Adams and "Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk" by David Sedaris, the portrayal of animal behavior and its intersection with human experiences offers a lighthearted yet insightful lens through which to contemplate the unexpected connections we encounter in our data.

Drawing inspiration from the realm of board games, the element of surprise in "Jumanji" and the strategic maneuvering in "Mouse Trap" bear a striking resemblance to the unpredictable correlations we have unearthed. While these analogies may appear far-fetched, they underscore the playful nature of our investigation and the audacious spirit with which we approach the unexpected links that captivate our imagination.

As we navigate this uncharted territory of interwoven renewable energy and squirrel-related internet inquiries, it becomes clear that the pursuit of knowledge often takes us on the most peculiar of journeys, where the absurd and the enlightening intertwine in ways that beguile and bemuse. With a twinkle in our eyes and a hearty dose of curiosity, we embark on this endeavor to decipher the enigmatic connection between hydropower energy and peculiar online searches, fully embracing the quirks and idiosyncrasies that make the pursuit of knowledge an endlessly fascinating pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pursuit of renewable energy sources has often led researchers down surprising paths, but none as unconventional as the relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Through data collected from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only illuminate the unusual interconnectedness of the world but also provide a quirky insight into the dynamics of human curiosity and online behavior. The implications of this research extend beyond the field of renewable energy and offer an amusing glimpse into the whimsical side of data analysis. Our study opens doors for further investigations into the unexpected connections that may exist within disparate datasets, reaffirming the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious world of academic research, it is not unusual to encounter serendipitous discoveries that defy all conventional wisdom. From the peculiar mating rituals of fruit flies to the correlation between the price of bananas and GDP growth, researchers have long been accustomed to embracing the unexpected. However, as we delve into the realm of renewable energy and online search behavior, one correlation stands out as particularly whimsical—the intriguing connection between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". You read that right. Squirrels and renewable energy; two seemingly unrelated topics interconnected in a way that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.
It is almost as if the data itself is whispering humorous anecdotes, and we, as researchers, are nothing more than unwitting stand-up comedians in a scientific circus. The sheer unpredictability of these correlations becomes an exercise in creative interpretation, inspiring us to ponder the absurdity, err, I mean, fascinating nuances of our world and our quest for knowledge.
As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we have harnessed the power of research methodologies to not only uncover this quirky association but also to illuminate the human penchant for the bizarre and unexpected. Our investigation delves beyond the mere numbers and boldly steps into the realm of the absurd, all in the name of advancing scientific knowledge and perhaps eliciting a chuckle or two along the way.
With our tongues firmly in our cheek and our calculators at the ready, we present our findings that may just leave you questioning conventional wisdom and pondering the comically oddball aspects of human behavior. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic link between hydropower energy and squirrel-related anxieties, proving once and for all that in the realm of academia, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Intergalactic Methodology: Unraveling the Quirky Correlation

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To decipher the mysterious and undoubtedly comical connection between hydropower energy in Tunisia and internet searches about squirrel attacks, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey through the labyrinth of data analysis. With a dash of scientific curiosity and a pinch of levity, we endeavored to extract meaning from what at first glance appeared to be an amusingly incongruous set of variables.

The data for hydropower energy production in Tunisia was acquired from the Energy Information Administration, a treasure trove of statistical insights and a veritable encyclopedia of energy-related statistics. As for the Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel", our primary source of information was the enigmatic entity known as Google Trends. Through this unconventional duet of data sources, we gleefully danced through the steps of statistical manipulation and revelled in the serendipitous nature of our scientific quest.

As seasoned explorers in the land of correlation coefficients and p-values, we adopted a methodology that was as precise as it was zany. With a blend of critical analysis and a sprinkle of quirk, we computed correlation coefficients using robust statistical software while keeping our eyes peeled for any statistically significant hints of whimsy. We cross-referenced the time frames of hydropower energy production and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel" from 2004 to 2021, casting our net wide to capture any potential correlations that might be lurking in the depths of the data ocean.

The statistical analysis was accompanied by moments of whimsical pondering and playful speculation, as we contemplated the intriguing implications of our findings. In the spirit of scientific exploration, we teased apart the nuances of the data, all while donning our metaphorical Sherlock Holmes hats and cultivating an environment of lighthearted inquiry. And as we toiled away amidst the numbers and spreadsheets, one thing became abundantly clear—our research methodology wasn't just about crunching numbers; it was about embracing the delightfully absurd and revealing the unexpected connections that underpin the tapestry of our world.

So, with a twinkle in our eyes and a robust methodology as our trusty guide, we embarked on a scientific escapade that traversed the boundaries of conventional research and embraced the whimsy of unconventional correlations. And the results? Well, let's just say they're as intriguing as stumbling upon a punchline in a scientific paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8478120, r-squared of 0.7187852, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pursuit of renewable energy sources has often led researchers down surprising paths, but none as unconventional as the relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Through data collected from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only illuminate the unusual interconnectedness of the world but also provide a quirky insight into the dynamics of human curiosity and online behavior. The implications of this research extend beyond the field of renewable energy and offer an amusing glimpse into the whimsical side of data analysis. Our study opens doors for further investigations into the unexpected connections that may exist within disparate datasets, reaffirming the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the illustrious world of academic research, it is not unusual to encounter serendipitous discoveries that defy all conventional wisdom. From the peculiar mating rituals of fruit flies to the correlation between the price of bananas and GDP growth, researchers have long been accustomed to embracing the unexpected. However, as we delve into the realm of renewable energy and online search behavior, one correlation stands out as particularly whimsical—the intriguing connection between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". You read that right. Squirrels and renewable energy; two seemingly unrelated topics interconnected in a way that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.
It is almost as if the data itself is whispering humorous anecdotes, and we, as researchers, are nothing more than unwitting stand-up comedians in a scientific circus. The sheer unpredictability of these correlations becomes an exercise in creative interpretation, inspiring us to ponder the absurdity, err, I mean, fascinating nuances of our world and our quest for knowledge.
As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we have harnessed the power of research methodologies to not only uncover this quirky association but also to illuminate the human penchant for the bizarre and unexpected. Our investigation delves beyond the mere numbers and boldly steps into the realm of the absurd, all in the name of advancing scientific knowledge and perhaps eliciting a chuckle or two along the way.
With our tongues firmly in our cheek and our calculators at the ready, we present our findings that may just leave you questioning conventional wisdom and pondering the comically oddball aspects of human behavior. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic link between hydropower energy and squirrel-related anxieties, proving once and for all that in the realm of academia, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our research team embarked on an adventure into the depths of data analysis, armed with a sense of humor and an insatiable curiosity for uncovering the unexpected. *Drumroll, please.* The results of our study revealed a pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8478120, an r-squared value of 0.7187852, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2021. Behold the magnificence of statistical significance as we unveil a correlation that defies all expectations!

In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". The points on the plot intertwine like the mystifying dance of statistical serendipity, leaving us all in awe of the whimsical interconnectedness within our dataset.

If our findings were a comedian, they'd be performing sold-out shows in the statistical comedy club. Our results not only confirm the presence of a notable correlation but also showcase the unexpected hilarity that emerges from the world of research. It's almost as if the universe itself decided to sprinkle a dash of humor into our data analysis, leaving us wondering whether statistics might just have a sense of humor. Who knew that renewable energy and rodent-related internet searches could share such a captivating correlation?

As we embrace the bizarreness of this discovery, we invite the scientific community to revel in the delightful absurdity of our results. The relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and the online fascination with squirrel-related mishaps not only challenges traditional research paradigms but also highlights the lighthearted side of data analysis. After all, who said science couldn't be fun?

These findings not only expand our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena but also challenge us to approach research with a keen eye for the unexpected. The correlation between hydropower energy and "attacked by a squirrel" searches is a testament to the marvelous peculiarity of our world, reminding us that sometimes, truth really is stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pursuit of renewable energy sources has often led researchers down surprising paths, but none as unconventional as the relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Through data collected from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only illuminate the unusual interconnectedness of the world but also provide a quirky insight into the dynamics of human curiosity and online behavior. The implications of this research extend beyond the field of renewable energy and offer an amusing glimpse into the whimsical side of data analysis. Our study opens doors for further investigations into the unexpected connections that may exist within disparate datasets, reaffirming the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel" may seem like a whimsical and unfathomable connection, but as we delve into the existing literature, it becomes evident that the interplay of seemingly unrelated variables is not without precedent.
In their study, Smith et al. (2015) explored the unexpected intersection of renewable energy and peculiar internet search trends, albeit in a different context. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2017) delved into the complexities of online behavior and its implications for renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the intricate relationship between human curiosity and search engine queries. These seminal works provided a foundational understanding of internet search patterns and their potential connection to renewable energy dynamics, setting the stage for the unlikely correlation we explore in this paper.
To gain a multidisciplinary perspective, we turn to non-fiction literature that may offer insights into the unanticipated interplay between renewable energy and wildlife encounters. In "The Secret Life of Bees" by Sue Monk Kidd and "The Nature Principle" by Richard Louv, we find compelling narratives on the intricate coexistence of humans and nature, hinting at the possibility of unexpected interactions between renewable energy production and wildlife habits. Furthermore, "The Sixth Extinction" by Elizabeth Kolbert presents a sobering exploration of biodiversity loss, serving as a somber reminder of the delicate balance between human activities and the natural world.
Before we venture into the realm of outright whimsy, it is worth considering the potential influence of fictional works on our understanding of human behavior and its manifestation in online search patterns. In "Watership Down" by Richard Adams and "Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk" by David Sedaris, the portrayal of animal behavior and its intersection with human experiences offers a lighthearted yet insightful lens through which to contemplate the unexpected connections we encounter in our data.
Drawing inspiration from the realm of board games, the element of surprise in "Jumanji" and the strategic maneuvering in "Mouse Trap" bear a striking resemblance to the unpredictable correlations we have unearthed. While these analogies may appear far-fetched, they underscore the playful nature of our investigation and the audacious spirit with which we approach the unexpected links that captivate our imagination.
As we navigate this uncharted territory of interwoven renewable energy and squirrel-related internet inquiries, it becomes clear that the pursuit of knowledge often takes us on the most peculiar of journeys, where the absurd and the enlightening intertwine in ways that beguile and bemuse. With a twinkle in our eyes and a hearty dose of curiosity, we embark on this endeavor to decipher the enigmatic connection between hydropower energy and peculiar online searches, fully embracing the quirks and idiosyncrasies that make the pursuit of knowledge an endlessly fascinating pursuit.

[[RESULTS]]
Our research team embarked on an adventure into the depths of data analysis, armed with a sense of humor and an insatiable curiosity for uncovering the unexpected. *Drumroll, please.* The results of our study revealed a pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8478120, an r-squared value of 0.7187852, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2021. Behold the magnificence of statistical significance as we unveil a correlation that defies all expectations!
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". The points on the plot intertwine like the mystifying dance of statistical serendipity, leaving us all in awe of the whimsical interconnectedness within our dataset.
If our findings were a comedian, they'd be performing sold-out shows in the statistical comedy club. Our results not only confirm the presence of a notable correlation but also showcase the unexpected hilarity that emerges from the world of research. It's almost as if the universe itself decided to sprinkle a dash of humor into our data analysis, leaving us wondering whether statistics might just have a sense of humor. Who knew that renewable energy and rodent-related internet searches could share such a captivating correlation?
As we embrace the bizarreness of this discovery, we invite the scientific community to revel in the delightful absurdity of our results. The relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and the online fascination with squirrel-related mishaps not only challenges traditional research paradigms but also highlights the lighthearted side of data analysis. After all, who said science couldn't be fun?
These findings not only expand our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena but also challenge us to approach research with a keen eye for the unexpected. The correlation between hydropower energy and "attacked by a squirrel" searches is a testament to the marvelous peculiarity of our world, reminding us that sometimes, truth really is stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have unearthed an enchanting correlation between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel", shedding light on the captivating capers of statistical serendipity. As we embark on this whimsical journey into the depths of data analysis, we are reminded that science, much like a stand-up comedy routine, often surprises us with unexpected punchlines.

The unexpected link between renewable energy and rodent-related internet searches may seem delightfully absurd, but our results echo the pioneering work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2017), who plumbed the depths of improbable correlations in the realm of renewable energy and online search trends. Their earnest exploration paved the way for our own foray into the realm of statistical surrealism, revealing that truth can indeed be as peculiar as fiction.

Drawing from the realm of non-fiction literature, our findings resonate with the delicate interplay between humans and nature depicted in "The Secret Life of Bees” and "The Nature Principle". These narratives offer a glimmer of insight into the unexpected connections we uncovered, reaffirming the adage that truth can often skip merrily down the path of whimsy.

In a nod to the literary realm of fiction, the unlikely connection we unraveled brings to mind the outrageous escapades of "Watership Down" and "Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk". These works, though fictional, provide a light-hearted lens through which to contemplate the enigmatic interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena, showcasing the delightful absurdity that knits our world together.

Our results, with a wiggle of statistical significance and a sprinkle of lightheartedness, not only support prior research but also underscore the whimsical nature of scientific discovery. The correlation between hydropower energy and squirrel-themed internet inquiries hints at the surprising interconnectedness that pokes its mischievous head out from amidst the data, urging us to approach research with an unquenchable curiosity and a hearty appreciation for the unexpected.

As we dance on the precipice of peculiarity, our study serves as a lighthearted reminder that the pursuit of knowledge possesses a side that is as quirky as it is illuminating. In the immortal words of the renowned scientist, Dr. Seuss, "Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple. And sometimes, the answers involve hydropower energy and curious squirrels."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia and Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The pursuit of renewable energy sources has often led researchers down surprising paths, but none as unconventional as the relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Through data collected from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only illuminate the unusual interconnectedness of the world but also provide a quirky insight into the dynamics of human curiosity and online behavior. The implications of this research extend beyond the field of renewable energy and offer an amusing glimpse into the whimsical side of data analysis. Our study opens doors for further investigations into the unexpected connections that may exist within disparate datasets, reaffirming the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the illustrious world of academic research, it is not unusual to encounter serendipitous discoveries that defy all conventional wisdom. From the peculiar mating rituals of fruit flies to the correlation between the price of bananas and GDP growth, researchers have long been accustomed to embracing the unexpected. However, as we delve into the realm of renewable energy and online search behavior, one correlation stands out as particularly whimsical—the intriguing connection between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". You read that right. Squirrels and renewable energy; two seemingly unrelated topics interconnected in a way that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow.
It is almost as if the data itself is whispering humorous anecdotes, and we, as researchers, are nothing more than unwitting stand-up comedians in a scientific circus. The sheer unpredictability of these correlations becomes an exercise in creative interpretation, inspiring us to ponder the absurdity, err, I mean, fascinating nuances of our world and our quest for knowledge.
As we embark on this journey of statistical exploration, we have harnessed the power of research methodologies to not only uncover this quirky association but also to illuminate the human penchant for the bizarre and unexpected. Our investigation delves beyond the mere numbers and boldly steps into the realm of the absurd, all in the name of advancing scientific knowledge and perhaps eliciting a chuckle or two along the way.
With our tongues firmly in our cheek and our calculators at the ready, we present our findings that may just leave you questioning conventional wisdom and pondering the comically oddball aspects of human behavior. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic link between hydropower energy and squirrel-related anxieties, proving once and for all that in the realm of academia, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

[[RESULTS]]
Our research team embarked on an adventure into the depths of data analysis, armed with a sense of humor and an insatiable curiosity for uncovering the unexpected. *Drumroll, please.* The results of our study revealed a pearson correlation coefficient of 0.8478120, an r-squared value of 0.7187852, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2021. Behold the magnificence of statistical significance as we unveil a correlation that defies all expectations!
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". The points on the plot intertwine like the mystifying dance of statistical serendipity, leaving us all in awe of the whimsical interconnectedness within our dataset.
If our findings were a comedian, they'd be performing sold-out shows in the statistical comedy club. Our results not only confirm the presence of a notable correlation but also showcase the unexpected hilarity that emerges from the world of research. It's almost as if the universe itself decided to sprinkle a dash of humor into our data analysis, leaving us wondering whether statistics might just have a sense of humor. Who knew that renewable energy and rodent-related internet searches could share such a captivating correlation?
As we embrace the bizarreness of this discovery, we invite the scientific community to revel in the delightful absurdity of our results. The relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and the online fascination with squirrel-related mishaps not only challenges traditional research paradigms but also highlights the lighthearted side of data analysis. After all, who said science couldn't be fun?
These findings not only expand our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena but also challenge us to approach research with a keen eye for the unexpected. The correlation between hydropower energy and "attacked by a squirrel" searches is a testament to the marvelous peculiarity of our world, reminding us that sometimes, truth really is stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the delightful and, dare I say, nutty connection between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". While we initially embarked on this research with a stoic commitment to scientific inquiry, we found ourselves swept away by the comedic charm of our unexpected findings.

It seems that the world of data analysis is not only a playground for statistical significance but also a stage for the most whimsical of correlations. As researchers, we have embraced the comical absurdity of our results and found ourselves humbled by the grandeur of statistical serendipity. This correlation, much like a mischievous squirrel, has darted through the branches of conventional research, leaving us in a state of bewildered amusement.

Our discovery serves as a reminder that in the hallowed halls of academia, there is always room for a good laugh and an unexpected twist. The affinity between hydropower energy and squirrel-related Google searches not only challenges traditional scientific inquiry but also beckons us to approach research with a sense of humor, a dash of whimsy, and, if you will, a sprinkle of statistical sparkle.

In the immortal words of Sir Isaac Newton (if he were a stand-up comedian), "What goes up must come down, just like a squirrel from a tree, and in the world of research, what goes in one dataset might unexpectedly correlate with another." With a nod to the bewitching dance of statistical interconnections, we assert that no more research is needed in this particular area. After all, an excess of scientific scrutiny might just frighten the squirrels away!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Eclectic Energy Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Center for Renewable Energy Studies and Squirrel Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Hydropower Energy in Tunisia: An Unlikely Connection to 'Attacked by a Squirrel' Google Searches with an abstract of The pursuit of renewable energy sources has often led researchers down surprising paths, but none as unconventional as the relationship between hydropower energy in Tunisia and Google searches for "attacked by a squirrel". In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of the correlation between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Through data collected from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8478120 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2021. Our findings not only illuminate the unusual interconnectedness of the world but also provide a quirky insight into the dynamics of human curiosity and online behavior. The implications of this research extend beyond the field of renewable energy and offer an amusing glimpse into the whimsical side of data analysis. Our study opens doors for further investigations into the unexpected connections that may exist within disparate datasets, reaffirming the adage that truth is often stranger than fiction.

ChatGPT:

hydropower energy, Tunisia, renewable energy, energy sources, unconventional research, correlation analysis, variable relationships, data analysis, Google Trends, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, human curiosity, online behavior, unexpected connections, disparate datasets

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Tunisia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia

Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'

Correlation r = 0.8478120 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7187852 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.9E-6. 0.0000088732129391501700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.00089% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 112,699 random variables You don't actually need 112 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia (Billion kWh)0.1520.1440.0910.0490.030.0780.050.0540.1090.0590.0550.0680.0450.0170.01650.06590.046020.06
Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel' (Rel. search volume)12.251211.752.4166703.333334.752.54.333333.9166720.9166672.583330.750.4166671.166671.416673.58333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.152,0.144,0.091,0.049,0.03,0.078,0.05,0.054,0.109,0.059,0.055,0.068,0.045,0.017,0.0165,0.0659,0.04602,0.06,])
array_2 = np.array([12.25,12,11.75,2.41667,0,3.33333,4.75,2.5,4.33333,3.91667,2,0.916667,2.58333,0.75,0.416667,1.16667,1.41667,3.58333,])
array_1_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Tunisia"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'attacked by a squirrel'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1897 · Black Variable ID: 24041 · Red Variable ID: 1354
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0