about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,886 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and the second variable is The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The decrease in GMO use led to a decrease in cotton production, which in turn led to a decrease in the need for labor relations specialists to handle disputes among cotton farmers and their workers. This created a cotton-picking conundrum for the specialists, leaving them with a-llint of work and ultimately leading to a decrease in their numbers. It seems the GMO-cotton connection has unraveled the job market for these specialists, leaving them in a real boll-up!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vast cotton field in Louisiana. Show workers tending to genetically modified cotton plants with attention to detail and care. In the midst of the field, depict a group of labor relations specialists engrossed in discussions with the workers, fostering a sense of solidarity and understanding. Capture the atmosphere of support and guidance as the specialists ensure fair and healthy working conditions, promoting positive relationships and a harmonious environment within the cotton field. The scene should be photo-realistic, portraying the serene beauty of the plantation and the interactions between the workers and specialists with lifelike clarity and detail. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Oragami 3D Pixar Style Scalar art A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cotton field in Louisiana, workers carefully plant and tend to genetically modified cotton plants. Among them, a group of labor relations specialists is seen engaging in discussions with the workers, ensuring fair and healthy working conditions. The specialists provide support and guidance, fostering positive relationships and productive teamwork within the cotton field.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cotton field in Louisiana, workers carefully plant and tend to genetically modified cotton plants. Among them, a group of labor relations specialists is seen engaging in discussions with the workers, ensuring fair and healthy working conditions. The specialists provide support and guidance, fostering positive relationships and productive teamwork within the cotton field. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vast cotton field in Louisiana. Show workers tending to genetically modified cotton plants with attention to detail and care. In the midst of the field, depict a group of labor relations specialists engrossed in discussions with the workers, fostering a sense of solidarity and understanding. Capture the atmosphere of support and guidance as the specialists ensure fair and healthy working conditions, promoting positive relationships and a harmonious environment within the cotton field. The scene should be photo-realistic, portraying the serene beauty of the plantation and the interactions between the workers and specialists with lifelike clarity and detail.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Louisiana caused The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana

The Journal of Agrarian Activism and Industrial Relations

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the fascinating connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. Our study aims to unravel the intricate web of factors influencing the labor market while sprinkling in some dad jokes to keep it light-hearted. This research sheds additional light on the potential impact of technological advancements on the workforce, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the seeds of change.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted an extensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't help but appreciate the "root" cause behind these intriguing patterns. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations sprouts more complexity than meets the "eye"!

This research illuminates the importance of exploring unconventional connections in the agricultural and labor sectors, inspiring scholars to "branch" out into new avenues of investigation. Our hope is that this study will not only plant the seeds of knowledge but also "cultivate" a sense of curiosity and humor in the academic community. We encourage readers to embrace the fertile ground of discovery and engage in light-hearted discourse, as humor can indeed be the best fertilizer for innovative thought.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the fascinating connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. Our study aims to unravel the intricate web of factors influencing the labor market while sprinkling in some dad jokes to keep it light-hearted. This research sheds additional light on the potential impact of technological advancements on the workforce, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the seeds of change.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted an extensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't help but appreciate the "root" cause behind these intriguing patterns. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations sprouts more complexity than meets the "eye"!

This research illuminates the importance of exploring unconventional connections in the agricultural and labor sectors, inspiring scholars to "branch" out into new avenues of investigation. Our hope is that this study will not only plant the seeds of knowledge but also "cultivate" a sense of curiosity and humor in the academic community. We encourage readers to embrace the fertile ground of discovery and engage in light-hearted discourse, as humor can indeed be the best fertilizer for innovative thought.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between technological advancements in agriculture and their impact on labor markets has always been a subject of intrigue, much like trying to figure out why the scarecrow won an award – he was outstanding in his field. With the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production, questions arise regarding their potential influence on the labor force. We are compelled to delve deeper into this connection, not only to sow the seeds of knowledge but also to cultivate a sense of humor in our exploration.

Louisiana, known for its verdant cotton fields and lively music festivals, also provides a unique backdrop for studying the relationship between GMO cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists. This research aims to dig through the soil of data, pluck out some intriguing findings, and weed out any misconceptions regarding this fascinating intersection.

As we peel back the layers of this agricultural abacus, we are reminded of the old farmer's adage, "Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field." In our pursuit of scholarly discovery, we aim to fertilize the academic discourse with a sprinkle of humor, much like a good crop rotation enriches the soil.

Our study employs a comprehensive analysis of data, meticulously collected from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, to unearth the correlations between GMO cotton production and the labor market. The observed correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 is as compelling as a cotton field against the Louisiana sunset, with a p-value so low, it must have been harvested by the underpaid laborers, but we digress.

We anticipate that our findings will inspire further research and discussions in this fertile field of study. After all, unraveling the mystery behind the connection between GMOs and labor relations specialists may yield fruit, much like the cotton bolls that sway in the Louisiana breeze. So, let us plant the seed of curiosity and humor as we embark on this agrarian adventure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the fascinating connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. Our study aims to unravel the intricate web of factors influencing the labor market while sprinkling in some dad jokes to keep it light-hearted. This research sheds additional light on the potential impact of technological advancements on the workforce, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the seeds of change.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted an extensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't help but appreciate the "root" cause behind these intriguing patterns. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations sprouts more complexity than meets the "eye"!

This research illuminates the importance of exploring unconventional connections in the agricultural and labor sectors, inspiring scholars to "branch" out into new avenues of investigation. Our hope is that this study will not only plant the seeds of knowledge but also "cultivate" a sense of curiosity and humor in the academic community. We encourage readers to embrace the fertile ground of discovery and engage in light-hearted discourse, as humor can indeed be the best fertilizer for innovative thought.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between technological advancements in agriculture and their impact on labor markets has always been a subject of intrigue, much like trying to figure out why the scarecrow won an award – he was outstanding in his field. With the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production, questions arise regarding their potential influence on the labor force. We are compelled to delve deeper into this connection, not only to sow the seeds of knowledge but also to cultivate a sense of humor in our exploration.
Louisiana, known for its verdant cotton fields and lively music festivals, also provides a unique backdrop for studying the relationship between GMO cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists. This research aims to dig through the soil of data, pluck out some intriguing findings, and weed out any misconceptions regarding this fascinating intersection.
As we peel back the layers of this agricultural abacus, we are reminded of the old farmer's adage, "Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field." In our pursuit of scholarly discovery, we aim to fertilize the academic discourse with a sprinkle of humor, much like a good crop rotation enriches the soil.
Our study employs a comprehensive analysis of data, meticulously collected from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, to unearth the correlations between GMO cotton production and the labor market. The observed correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 is as compelling as a cotton field against the Louisiana sunset, with a p-value so low, it must have been harvested by the underpaid laborers, but we digress.
We anticipate that our findings will inspire further research and discussions in this fertile field of study. After all, unraveling the mystery behind the connection between GMOs and labor relations specialists may yield fruit, much like the cotton bolls that sway in the Louisiana breeze. So, let us plant the seed of curiosity and humor as we embark on this agrarian adventure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their comprehensive study, Smith et al. (2015) delve into the intricate relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their impact on agricultural production. Their research highlights the potential benefits and drawbacks of GMO utilization, weaving a narrative as complex as a tangled vine in the Louisiana bayou. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) provide a thorough investigation into the labor market dynamics within the state of Louisiana, offering insights as rich as freshly cultivated cotton.

Speaking of cotton, have you heard about the guy who became a farmer? He heard that it was a "growing" industry! (Rubenstein, 2019) As we explore the association between GMO cotton production and the presence of labor relations specialists, we must not discount the potential "crop" of humor that can flourish amidst scholarly discourse.

In "Cotton: The Fabric That Made the Modern World," author Sven Beckert dissects the historical and economic impact of cotton production, shedding light on the fabric that threaded societies together. Moving onto fiction, the agrarian adventures found in John Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath" and Margaret Mitchell's "Gone with the Wind" offer a unique perspective on the labor-intensive nature of cotton farming, providing a literary landscape as vast as the cotton fields themselves.

Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the meme on the farm – the viral "Old Town Road" TikTok videos that have galloped their way into the hearts and screens of many. As we analyze the influence of GMO cotton production on the labor market, we can't help but celebrate the "yeehaw" spirit and the lively choreography that has swept through social media. Perhaps we can learn a thing or two about labor relations from these "trending" phenomena.

In "Seeds of Change: Plant Genomics and Agricultural Biotechnology," the authors argue that GMO utilization has the potential to revolutionize agricultural practices, offering a blueprint for improvements as plentiful as a fully bloomed cotton plant. On the other hand, "GMOs: The Myths, the Truths, and the Questions" by Amanda Maximo provides a critical analysis of GMO controversies, cultivating a debate as heated as a summer day in the cotton fields.

Venturing deeper into the cultural relevance of cotton farming, "The Story of Cotton" by Rosita Wolfe captures the essence of this resilient crop, narrating a tale as enduring as a well-tended cotton field. As we connect this cultural narrative to the labor market landscape, the complexities of the relationship become as tangled as a ball of yarn, or in this case, a luscious crop of cotton.

In summary, the relationship between GMO cotton production and labor relations specialists in Louisiana presents a ripe landscape for investigation, offering a blend of academic inquiry and light-hearted banter that is as refreshing as a glass of sweet tea on a hot summer day. As we plow through the fertile fields of research, we invite our readers to join us in esteeming the importance of agricultural technology, labor dynamics, and a healthy dose of puns in scholarly exploration. After all, who's to say that research can't be both informative and "pun"-derful?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the fascinating connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. Our study aims to unravel the intricate web of factors influencing the labor market while sprinkling in some dad jokes to keep it light-hearted. This research sheds additional light on the potential impact of technological advancements on the workforce, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the seeds of change.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted an extensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't help but appreciate the "root" cause behind these intriguing patterns. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations sprouts more complexity than meets the "eye"!

This research illuminates the importance of exploring unconventional connections in the agricultural and labor sectors, inspiring scholars to "branch" out into new avenues of investigation. Our hope is that this study will not only plant the seeds of knowledge but also "cultivate" a sense of curiosity and humor in the academic community. We encourage readers to embrace the fertile ground of discovery and engage in light-hearted discourse, as humor can indeed be the best fertilizer for innovative thought.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between technological advancements in agriculture and their impact on labor markets has always been a subject of intrigue, much like trying to figure out why the scarecrow won an award – he was outstanding in his field. With the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production, questions arise regarding their potential influence on the labor force. We are compelled to delve deeper into this connection, not only to sow the seeds of knowledge but also to cultivate a sense of humor in our exploration.
Louisiana, known for its verdant cotton fields and lively music festivals, also provides a unique backdrop for studying the relationship between GMO cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists. This research aims to dig through the soil of data, pluck out some intriguing findings, and weed out any misconceptions regarding this fascinating intersection.
As we peel back the layers of this agricultural abacus, we are reminded of the old farmer's adage, "Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field." In our pursuit of scholarly discovery, we aim to fertilize the academic discourse with a sprinkle of humor, much like a good crop rotation enriches the soil.
Our study employs a comprehensive analysis of data, meticulously collected from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, to unearth the correlations between GMO cotton production and the labor market. The observed correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 is as compelling as a cotton field against the Louisiana sunset, with a p-value so low, it must have been harvested by the underpaid laborers, but we digress.
We anticipate that our findings will inspire further research and discussions in this fertile field of study. After all, unraveling the mystery behind the connection between GMOs and labor relations specialists may yield fruit, much like the cotton bolls that sway in the Louisiana breeze. So, let us plant the seed of curiosity and humor as we embark on this agrarian adventure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana, our research employed a multifaceted approach akin to a delicate dance between the cotton bolls swaying in the breeze and the labor specialists waltzing through their negotiations. Our data-gathering process involved digital scavenging akin to a technological treasure hunt, where we harvested the most robust and bountiful data sources from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics to create a rich patchwork quilt of information spanning the years 2012 to 2022.

We then engaged in a quantitative analysis, calibrating our statistical instruments to measure the potential interactions between GMO cotton production and labor relations specialists. Think of it as playing a symphony where the correlation coefficient waltzed with the p-value, creating harmonious melodies that resonated with the scientific community.

Since we were venturing into the weeds of academic exploration that others may find baleful and laborious, it was essential to employ advanced statistical models. We utilized regression analyses to plow through the data, revealing the intricate patterns hidden beneath the fertile surface. While the process may have seemed complex, it was crucial to delve into the depths of the data as if we were hunting for a needle in the haystack, albeit a genetically modified needle.

In parallel, we conducted qualitative assessments to capture the nuanced aspects, much like a painter capturing the vivid colors of a sunset over a cotton field. Here, we meticulously studied labor market reports, industry publications, and agrarian narratives, seeking to weave a rich tapestry of insights that complemented our quantitative findings.

To ensure the reliability and validity of our study, we treaded carefully through the statistical fields, remaining vigilant for any thorny data outliers and misleading correlations. Our methodological rigor was the horticultural equivalent of pruning the data to foster healthy and fruitful analyses, ensuring that our results were as ripe and succulent as a Louisiana watermelon in the heat of summer.

Lastly, we engaged in thorough sensitivity analyses, akin to checking the weather forecast before sowing seeds, to assess the robustness of our findings. This allowed us to assess how variations in our models affected the overall yield of our results, ensuring that our conclusions were as resilient as a field of cotton in the face of unforeseen weather patterns.

So, armed with a blend of quantitative and qualitative tools and an irrepressible sense of humor, we ventured forth into this intriguing landscape, embracing the potential of GMO cotton production as a fascinating lens through which to explore the labor market, much like a good farmer cultivates their crop with both diligence and whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8577141, r-squared of 0.7356734, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the fascinating connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. Our study aims to unravel the intricate web of factors influencing the labor market while sprinkling in some dad jokes to keep it light-hearted. This research sheds additional light on the potential impact of technological advancements on the workforce, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the seeds of change.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted an extensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't help but appreciate the "root" cause behind these intriguing patterns. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations sprouts more complexity than meets the "eye"!

This research illuminates the importance of exploring unconventional connections in the agricultural and labor sectors, inspiring scholars to "branch" out into new avenues of investigation. Our hope is that this study will not only plant the seeds of knowledge but also "cultivate" a sense of curiosity and humor in the academic community. We encourage readers to embrace the fertile ground of discovery and engage in light-hearted discourse, as humor can indeed be the best fertilizer for innovative thought.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between technological advancements in agriculture and their impact on labor markets has always been a subject of intrigue, much like trying to figure out why the scarecrow won an award – he was outstanding in his field. With the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production, questions arise regarding their potential influence on the labor force. We are compelled to delve deeper into this connection, not only to sow the seeds of knowledge but also to cultivate a sense of humor in our exploration.
Louisiana, known for its verdant cotton fields and lively music festivals, also provides a unique backdrop for studying the relationship between GMO cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists. This research aims to dig through the soil of data, pluck out some intriguing findings, and weed out any misconceptions regarding this fascinating intersection.
As we peel back the layers of this agricultural abacus, we are reminded of the old farmer's adage, "Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field." In our pursuit of scholarly discovery, we aim to fertilize the academic discourse with a sprinkle of humor, much like a good crop rotation enriches the soil.
Our study employs a comprehensive analysis of data, meticulously collected from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, to unearth the correlations between GMO cotton production and the labor market. The observed correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 is as compelling as a cotton field against the Louisiana sunset, with a p-value so low, it must have been harvested by the underpaid laborers, but we digress.
We anticipate that our findings will inspire further research and discussions in this fertile field of study. After all, unraveling the mystery behind the connection between GMOs and labor relations specialists may yield fruit, much like the cotton bolls that sway in the Louisiana breeze. So, let us plant the seed of curiosity and humor as we embark on this agrarian adventure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. This strong correlation suggests a clear relationship, leaving little room for doubt, much like the steadfast commitment of a scarecrow guarding the crops. Our findings point to a significant association between the adoption of GMO cotton and the demand for labor relations expertise, rooting our study in the fertile ground of agricultural and labor dynamics.

Figure 1 illustrates the impressive correlation between GMO cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists, resembling a field of meticulously planted cotton seeds aligning with the labor force, creating a pattern as pleasing to the eye as a well-tended garden. The "GMO factor" seems to have taken root in the labor market, echoing the profound impact of agricultural innovation on the workforce. One could say that our results certainly "crop up" some intriguing revelations, much like a surprise harvest in the dead of winter.

The obtained r-squared value of 0.7356734 emphasizes the strength of the association, indicating that approximately 73.57% of the variance in labor relations specialists can be explained by the utilization of GMOs in cotton production. This substantial explanatory power is as captivating as a captivating harvest moon over a cotton field, shedding light on the complex interplay between technological advancements and labor dynamics. It appears that the seeds of change sown by GMO cotton cultivation have indeed germinated fruitful insights into the labor market.

The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of the robustness of the relationship. The probability of observing such a strong association by mere chance is as slim as a stalk of cotton swaying in the breeze, underscoring the substantive connection between GMO use in cotton and the demand for labor relations expertise in Louisiana. Our results serve as a reminder that beneath the humor lies the serious pursuit of knowledge, much like a well-tilled field reaps a bountiful harvest. And speaking of humor, did you hear about the agricultural worker who won an award? He was outstanding in his field, just like our findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the fascinating connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. Our study aims to unravel the intricate web of factors influencing the labor market while sprinkling in some dad jokes to keep it light-hearted. This research sheds additional light on the potential impact of technological advancements on the workforce, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the seeds of change.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted an extensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't help but appreciate the "root" cause behind these intriguing patterns. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations sprouts more complexity than meets the "eye"!

This research illuminates the importance of exploring unconventional connections in the agricultural and labor sectors, inspiring scholars to "branch" out into new avenues of investigation. Our hope is that this study will not only plant the seeds of knowledge but also "cultivate" a sense of curiosity and humor in the academic community. We encourage readers to embrace the fertile ground of discovery and engage in light-hearted discourse, as humor can indeed be the best fertilizer for innovative thought.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their comprehensive study, Smith et al. (2015) delve into the intricate relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their impact on agricultural production. Their research highlights the potential benefits and drawbacks of GMO utilization, weaving a narrative as complex as a tangled vine in the Louisiana bayou. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) provide a thorough investigation into the labor market dynamics within the state of Louisiana, offering insights as rich as freshly cultivated cotton.
Speaking of cotton, have you heard about the guy who became a farmer? He heard that it was a "growing" industry! (Rubenstein, 2019) As we explore the association between GMO cotton production and the presence of labor relations specialists, we must not discount the potential "crop" of humor that can flourish amidst scholarly discourse.
In "Cotton: The Fabric That Made the Modern World," author Sven Beckert dissects the historical and economic impact of cotton production, shedding light on the fabric that threaded societies together. Moving onto fiction, the agrarian adventures found in John Steinbeck's "The Grapes of Wrath" and Margaret Mitchell's "Gone with the Wind" offer a unique perspective on the labor-intensive nature of cotton farming, providing a literary landscape as vast as the cotton fields themselves.
Now, let's address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the meme on the farm – the viral "Old Town Road" TikTok videos that have galloped their way into the hearts and screens of many. As we analyze the influence of GMO cotton production on the labor market, we can't help but celebrate the "yeehaw" spirit and the lively choreography that has swept through social media. Perhaps we can learn a thing or two about labor relations from these "trending" phenomena.
In "Seeds of Change: Plant Genomics and Agricultural Biotechnology," the authors argue that GMO utilization has the potential to revolutionize agricultural practices, offering a blueprint for improvements as plentiful as a fully bloomed cotton plant. On the other hand, "GMOs: The Myths, the Truths, and the Questions" by Amanda Maximo provides a critical analysis of GMO controversies, cultivating a debate as heated as a summer day in the cotton fields.
Venturing deeper into the cultural relevance of cotton farming, "The Story of Cotton" by Rosita Wolfe captures the essence of this resilient crop, narrating a tale as enduring as a well-tended cotton field. As we connect this cultural narrative to the labor market landscape, the complexities of the relationship become as tangled as a ball of yarn, or in this case, a luscious crop of cotton.
In summary, the relationship between GMO cotton production and labor relations specialists in Louisiana presents a ripe landscape for investigation, offering a blend of academic inquiry and light-hearted banter that is as refreshing as a glass of sweet tea on a hot summer day. As we plow through the fertile fields of research, we invite our readers to join us in esteeming the importance of agricultural technology, labor dynamics, and a healthy dose of puns in scholarly exploration. After all, who's to say that research can't be both informative and "pun"-derful?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. This strong correlation suggests a clear relationship, leaving little room for doubt, much like the steadfast commitment of a scarecrow guarding the crops. Our findings point to a significant association between the adoption of GMO cotton and the demand for labor relations expertise, rooting our study in the fertile ground of agricultural and labor dynamics.
Figure 1 illustrates the impressive correlation between GMO cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists, resembling a field of meticulously planted cotton seeds aligning with the labor force, creating a pattern as pleasing to the eye as a well-tended garden. The "GMO factor" seems to have taken root in the labor market, echoing the profound impact of agricultural innovation on the workforce. One could say that our results certainly "crop up" some intriguing revelations, much like a surprise harvest in the dead of winter.
The obtained r-squared value of 0.7356734 emphasizes the strength of the association, indicating that approximately 73.57% of the variance in labor relations specialists can be explained by the utilization of GMOs in cotton production. This substantial explanatory power is as captivating as a captivating harvest moon over a cotton field, shedding light on the complex interplay between technological advancements and labor dynamics. It appears that the seeds of change sown by GMO cotton cultivation have indeed germinated fruitful insights into the labor market.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of the robustness of the relationship. The probability of observing such a strong association by mere chance is as slim as a stalk of cotton swaying in the breeze, underscoring the substantive connection between GMO use in cotton and the demand for labor relations expertise in Louisiana. Our results serve as a reminder that beneath the humor lies the serious pursuit of knowledge, much like a well-tilled field reaps a bountiful harvest. And speaking of humor, did you hear about the agricultural worker who won an award? He was outstanding in his field, just like our findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study sought to untangle the intricate relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. Our findings align with prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), supporting the notion that GMO utilization and its impact on agricultural production intertwine with the labor market dynamics within the state. The "root" cause of these characteristics seems to be deeply embedded in the soil of the Louisiana labor market, cultivating a complex interplay with agricultural innovation.

The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 uncovered in our analysis underlines the robustness of the relationship, much like the sturdy "stalk" of a cotton plant standing tall in the field. This finding supports the idea that the adoption of GMO cotton significantly influences the demand for labor relations expertise in Louisiana, akin to how a well-fertilized seed yields a healthy crop. The correlation seems to have "sprouted" some compelling evidence, further enriching our understanding of the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and labor dynamics.

Our results also echo the sentiment of past literature, emphasizing the impact of GMO utilization on the agricultural landscape, labor market, and broader socio-economic dynamics, much like the threads of a well-made cotton fabric weaving through various strands of society. Thus, our study not only cultivates a deeper comprehension of the seeds of change but also "branches out" into new avenues of investigation, much like a flourishing cotton field extending its reach.

The r-squared value of 0.7356734 further solidifies the strength of the association, reflecting the substantial variance in labor relations specialists explained by GMO cotton production. This deep explanatory power underscores the significant influence of technological advancements in shaping labor dynamics, reminding us that beneath the surface lies a deep well of insights, much like the rich fertile soil beneath a cotton field.

Moreover, the statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, substantiates the substantive connection between GMO use in cotton and the demand for labor relations expertise in Louisiana. This finding not only emphasizes the importance of agricultural innovation but also serves as a reminder that beneath the humor lies the serious pursuit of knowledge, much like the "yolk" of a well-crafted dad joke hiding the wisdom of a seasoned academic.

In plowing through these findings, albeit with a sprinkle of humor, we have only begun to scratch the surface of the complex relationship between GMO cotton production and the labor market in Louisiana. Our study serves as a testament to the curious, "pun"-derful nature of scholarly inquiry, as we nurture a deeper understanding of the tangled web of forces shaping our labor markets. And speaking of nurturing, remember, never trust an atom. They make up everything!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the fascinating connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. Our study aims to unravel the intricate web of factors influencing the labor market while sprinkling in some dad jokes to keep it light-hearted. This research sheds additional light on the potential impact of technological advancements on the workforce, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the seeds of change.

Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted an extensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't help but appreciate the "root" cause behind these intriguing patterns. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations sprouts more complexity than meets the "eye"!

This research illuminates the importance of exploring unconventional connections in the agricultural and labor sectors, inspiring scholars to "branch" out into new avenues of investigation. Our hope is that this study will not only plant the seeds of knowledge but also "cultivate" a sense of curiosity and humor in the academic community. We encourage readers to embrace the fertile ground of discovery and engage in light-hearted discourse, as humor can indeed be the best fertilizer for innovative thought.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between technological advancements in agriculture and their impact on labor markets has always been a subject of intrigue, much like trying to figure out why the scarecrow won an award – he was outstanding in his field. With the rise of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production, questions arise regarding their potential influence on the labor force. We are compelled to delve deeper into this connection, not only to sow the seeds of knowledge but also to cultivate a sense of humor in our exploration.
Louisiana, known for its verdant cotton fields and lively music festivals, also provides a unique backdrop for studying the relationship between GMO cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists. This research aims to dig through the soil of data, pluck out some intriguing findings, and weed out any misconceptions regarding this fascinating intersection.
As we peel back the layers of this agricultural abacus, we are reminded of the old farmer's adage, "Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field." In our pursuit of scholarly discovery, we aim to fertilize the academic discourse with a sprinkle of humor, much like a good crop rotation enriches the soil.
Our study employs a comprehensive analysis of data, meticulously collected from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, to unearth the correlations between GMO cotton production and the labor market. The observed correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 is as compelling as a cotton field against the Louisiana sunset, with a p-value so low, it must have been harvested by the underpaid laborers, but we digress.
We anticipate that our findings will inspire further research and discussions in this fertile field of study. After all, unraveling the mystery behind the connection between GMOs and labor relations specialists may yield fruit, much like the cotton bolls that sway in the Louisiana breeze. So, let us plant the seed of curiosity and humor as we embark on this agrarian adventure.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. This strong correlation suggests a clear relationship, leaving little room for doubt, much like the steadfast commitment of a scarecrow guarding the crops. Our findings point to a significant association between the adoption of GMO cotton and the demand for labor relations expertise, rooting our study in the fertile ground of agricultural and labor dynamics.
Figure 1 illustrates the impressive correlation between GMO cotton production and the number of labor relations specialists, resembling a field of meticulously planted cotton seeds aligning with the labor force, creating a pattern as pleasing to the eye as a well-tended garden. The "GMO factor" seems to have taken root in the labor market, echoing the profound impact of agricultural innovation on the workforce. One could say that our results certainly "crop up" some intriguing revelations, much like a surprise harvest in the dead of winter.
The obtained r-squared value of 0.7356734 emphasizes the strength of the association, indicating that approximately 73.57% of the variance in labor relations specialists can be explained by the utilization of GMOs in cotton production. This substantial explanatory power is as captivating as a captivating harvest moon over a cotton field, shedding light on the complex interplay between technological advancements and labor dynamics. It appears that the seeds of change sown by GMO cotton cultivation have indeed germinated fruitful insights into the labor market.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of the robustness of the relationship. The probability of observing such a strong association by mere chance is as slim as a stalk of cotton swaying in the breeze, underscoring the substantive connection between GMO use in cotton and the demand for labor relations expertise in Louisiana. Our results serve as a reminder that beneath the humor lies the serious pursuit of knowledge, much like a well-tilled field reaps a bountiful harvest. And speaking of humor, did you hear about the agricultural worker who won an award? He was outstanding in his field, just like our findings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a robust and statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. The strength of this association suggests a compelling relationship, akin to the unyielding determination of a scarecrow guarding the fields. Our findings underscore the pressing need to further plow the fertile ground of the agricultural and labor sectors to cultivate a deeper understanding of these interconnected dynamics.

Our study adds to the growing body of evidence highlighting the potential impact of technological advancements in agriculture on the labor market, as we strive to sow the seeds of knowledge while sprinkling in some humor to keep it light-hearted. The relationship uncovered between GMO cotton production and labor relations specialists not only cultivates curiosity but also reaps meaningful insights into the evolving landscape of work in Louisiana.

As we reflect on our findings, we are reminded of the age-old wisdom that sometimes the most fruitful harvests come from the unlikeliest of seeds – much like the unexpected connections we've unearthed in this study. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations indeed teems with complexity, much like a corny joke at a dull conference – it just "stalks" you.

In light of our comprehensive analysis and the compelling results obtained, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, just like there's no need to add more fertilizer to a well-tended crop. Our findings stand tall and proud, much like – you guessed it – an outstanding scarecrow in the field. This research not only branches out into unexplored territory but also upholds the importance of cultivating a sense of humor as we plow through academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agrarian Activism and Industrial Relations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Quantum Agricultural Research Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Seeding Change: Exploring the Relationship Between GMO Cotton Production and Labor Relations Specialists in Louisiana with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the fascinating connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the number of labor relations specialists in the state. Our study aims to unravel the intricate web of factors influencing the labor market while sprinkling in some dad jokes to keep it light-hearted. This research sheds additional light on the potential impact of technological advancements on the workforce, as we strive to cultivate a deeper understanding of the seeds of change.
Utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted an extensive analysis covering the period from 2012 to 2022. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8577141 and a p-value less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship. As we dug deeper into the data, we couldn't help but appreciate the "root" cause behind these intriguing patterns. It seems that the conversation around GMOs and labor relations sprouts more complexity than meets the "eye"!
This research illuminates the importance of exploring unconventional connections in the agricultural and labor sectors, inspiring scholars to "branch" out into new avenues of investigation. Our hope is that this study will not only plant the seeds of knowledge but also "cultivate" a sense of curiosity and humor in the academic community. We encourage readers to embrace the fertile ground of discovery and engage in light-hearted discourse, as humor can indeed be the best fertilizer for innovative thought.

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton production, labor relations specialists, Louisiana, genetically modified organisms, cotton production, labor market, technological advancements, USDA, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, agricultural sector, workforce, labor market analysis, GMOs and labor relations, agricultural labor, innovative thought, humor in academia

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Louisiana
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Louisiana that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Louisiana

The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of labor relations specialists in Louisiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana

Correlation r = 0.8577141 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7356734 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Louisiana) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00073. 0.0007340669762561638000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.073% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,362 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.53, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Louisiana (GMO cotton %)9161172544626
The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana (Laborers)230260240150120130150140140140100




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9,16,11,7,2,5,4,4,6,2,6,])
array_2 = np.array([230,260,240,150,120,130,150,140,140,140,100,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "The number of labor relations specialists in Louisiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 1886 · Black Variable ID: 783 · Red Variable ID: 19116
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0