about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,875 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Layne and the second variable is Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories.  The chart goes from 2001 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps the name Layne sounds a lot like "Layne the Lightning Wizard" in Arabic folklore. Every time a new Layne was born, local legend has it that a surge of electricity would zip through the land, leading to a shocking increase in power production. It's like they say, with great names comes great electrical responsibility!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cutesy art illustration ] Create an endearing scene of a bustling Palestinian city where a group of joyful children are playfully writing the name "Layne" in vibrant chalk on the sidewalk, their faces beaming with excitement and laughter. In the background, portray a charming power station at work, emitting a warm glow of energy that powers the surrounding buildings and streetlights. Capture the innocence and liveliness of the children's playful activity amidst the urban energy buzz. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Minimalism Concept art Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Palestinian city, a group of children playfully write the name "Layne" in colorful chalk on the sidewalk, cheering and laughing as they do. In the background, a small power station hums with activity, generating electricity for the surrounding buildings and streetlights.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Palestinian city, a group of children playfully write the name "Layne" in colorful chalk on the sidewalk, cheering and laughing as they do. In the background, a small power station hums with activity, generating electricity for the surrounding buildings and streetlights. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cutesy art illustration ] Create an endearing scene of a bustling Palestinian city where a group of joyful children are playfully writing the name "Layne" in vibrant chalk on the sidewalk, their faces beaming with excitement and laughter. In the background, portray a charming power station at work, emitting a warm glow of energy that powers the surrounding buildings and streetlights. Capture the innocence and liveliness of the children's playful activity amidst the urban energy buzz.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Layne caused Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories

The Journal of Electrifying Sociolinguistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. As unconventional as it sounds, our research team delved into this shockingly intriguing relationship using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, shedding light on this electrifying phenomenon. The implications of these findings, though certainly unexpected, have the potential to spark further discussions in both the realms of naming trends and energy generation. Join us as we venture into this electrifying intersection of human identity and power production, where sparks of curiosity lead to illuminating discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. As unconventional as it sounds, our research team delved into this shockingly intriguing relationship using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, shedding light on this electrifying phenomenon. The implications of these findings, though certainly unexpected, have the potential to spark further discussions in both the realms of naming trends and energy generation. Join us as we venture into this electrifying intersection of human identity and power production, where sparks of curiosity lead to illuminating discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome to a shockingly electrifying journey into the world of statistical analysis and amusing name phenomena! In this paper, we venture into uncharted territory to explore the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. While most research papers aim for conventional topics, we are here to spice things up and shed some light on this curious connection that will leave you positively charged with laughter and insight.

Picture this: a bunch of researchers sitting around, brainstorming wacky ideas, when suddenly someone blurts out, "Hey, what if there's a link between baby names and electricity production?" Well, brace yourself, because we actually took that idea and ran with it. We dived into the obscure depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, determined to uncover the mysteries lurking beneath this zappy relationship.

Now, you might be thinking, "How on earth does someone come up with the idea to study a connection between baby names and electricity generation?" Trust us, we had our doubts too, but we couldn't resist the opportunity to spark some excitement in the field of statistical analysis by uncovering this wattage-laden gem.

It's essential to note that our research is grounded in rigorous analysis, despite the hair-raising subject matter. We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 with p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, effectively illuminating this electrifying phenomenon. And no, that correlation coefficient is not a typo - it's as shocking as it sounds!

So, get ready to be electrified, as we embark on a journey through the ebb and flow of name popularity and energy production. This paper aims to demonstrate that, even in the realm of serious quantitative analysis, there's room for a bit of whimsy and unexpected discoveries. Buckle up, because it's going to be a hair-raising ride through the electrifying intersection of human identity and power production!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. As unconventional as it sounds, our research team delved into this shockingly intriguing relationship using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, shedding light on this electrifying phenomenon. The implications of these findings, though certainly unexpected, have the potential to spark further discussions in both the realms of naming trends and energy generation. Join us as we venture into this electrifying intersection of human identity and power production, where sparks of curiosity lead to illuminating discoveries.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome to a shockingly electrifying journey into the world of statistical analysis and amusing name phenomena! In this paper, we venture into uncharted territory to explore the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. While most research papers aim for conventional topics, we are here to spice things up and shed some light on this curious connection that will leave you positively charged with laughter and insight.
Picture this: a bunch of researchers sitting around, brainstorming wacky ideas, when suddenly someone blurts out, "Hey, what if there's a link between baby names and electricity production?" Well, brace yourself, because we actually took that idea and ran with it. We dived into the obscure depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, determined to uncover the mysteries lurking beneath this zappy relationship.
Now, you might be thinking, "How on earth does someone come up with the idea to study a connection between baby names and electricity generation?" Trust us, we had our doubts too, but we couldn't resist the opportunity to spark some excitement in the field of statistical analysis by uncovering this wattage-laden gem.
It's essential to note that our research is grounded in rigorous analysis, despite the hair-raising subject matter. We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 with p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, effectively illuminating this electrifying phenomenon. And no, that correlation coefficient is not a typo - it's as shocking as it sounds!
So, get ready to be electrified, as we embark on a journey through the ebb and flow of name popularity and energy production. This paper aims to demonstrate that, even in the realm of serious quantitative analysis, there's room for a bit of whimsy and unexpected discoveries. Buckle up, because it's going to be a hair-raising ride through the electrifying intersection of human identity and power production!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith, Doe, and Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive study on naming trends and societal influences, shedding light on the interconnected nature of personal nomenclature and cultural phenomena. Their research delves into the psychological and sociological implications of name popularity, presenting a thought-provoking analysis that sets the stage for understanding the electrifying correlation we aim to explore.

In "The Sparks of Naming: Unraveling the Mysteries of Identity" by Adams and Brown (2015), the authors delve into the historical, cultural, and psychological significance of naming practices. This insightful work provides a foundational understanding of the complexities inherent in the process of naming, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the shocking link between the name "Layne" and electricity generation.

On a more lighthearted note, "The Power of Names: A Shocking Tale" by Lightfoot and Watts (2018) offers an entertaining exploration of the whimsical connections between names and unexpected outcomes. While their work may lean towards the humorous side, it nevertheless presents intriguing insights that resonate with our study's unconventional approach.

As we journey into the realm of fiction, the classic novel "Electric Dreams" by Rivers and Watts (1984) takes readers on an electrifying adventure through an alternate reality where the power of names holds a mesmerizing sway over the fabric of existence. Though a work of fiction, the themes explored in this novel serve as a metaphorical backdrop for our investigation into the surprising relationship between the name "Layne" and electricity generation.

In a more contemporary context, the critically acclaimed TV show "Current Affairs" provides a captivating glimpse into the intricacies of energy production and distribution. While our viewing of this series was primarily for leisure, the insights gained from its portrayal of power generation served as an unexpected source of inspiration for our research endeavor.

Moving beyond the realm of scholarly literature, our foray into pop culture and entertainment underscores the multifaceted nature of the concepts we are exploring. As we synthesize these diverse perspectives into our analysis, we embrace the delightful synergy of the serious and the whimsical in our pursuit of understanding the electrifying correlation between the name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2001 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. As unconventional as it sounds, our research team delved into this shockingly intriguing relationship using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, shedding light on this electrifying phenomenon. The implications of these findings, though certainly unexpected, have the potential to spark further discussions in both the realms of naming trends and energy generation. Join us as we venture into this electrifying intersection of human identity and power production, where sparks of curiosity lead to illuminating discoveries.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome to a shockingly electrifying journey into the world of statistical analysis and amusing name phenomena! In this paper, we venture into uncharted territory to explore the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. While most research papers aim for conventional topics, we are here to spice things up and shed some light on this curious connection that will leave you positively charged with laughter and insight.
Picture this: a bunch of researchers sitting around, brainstorming wacky ideas, when suddenly someone blurts out, "Hey, what if there's a link between baby names and electricity production?" Well, brace yourself, because we actually took that idea and ran with it. We dived into the obscure depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, determined to uncover the mysteries lurking beneath this zappy relationship.
Now, you might be thinking, "How on earth does someone come up with the idea to study a connection between baby names and electricity generation?" Trust us, we had our doubts too, but we couldn't resist the opportunity to spark some excitement in the field of statistical analysis by uncovering this wattage-laden gem.
It's essential to note that our research is grounded in rigorous analysis, despite the hair-raising subject matter. We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 with p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, effectively illuminating this electrifying phenomenon. And no, that correlation coefficient is not a typo - it's as shocking as it sounds!
So, get ready to be electrified, as we embark on a journey through the ebb and flow of name popularity and energy production. This paper aims to demonstrate that, even in the realm of serious quantitative analysis, there's room for a bit of whimsy and unexpected discoveries. Buckle up, because it's going to be a hair-raising ride through the electrifying intersection of human identity and power production!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the electrifying mystery behind the correlation between the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories, we concocted a research methodology that was as unconventional as the topic itself. Our exploration into this uncharted territory involved a blend of statistical analysis, digital sleuthing, and a few cups of coffee to keep us buzzing with energy.

Data Collection:
First, we embarked on a virtual scavenger hunt across the vast expanse of the internet, with a particular focus on sources that would shed light on both baby name trends and electricity generation. The primary sources of our data were the US Social Security Administration for baby name popularity and the Energy Information Administration for electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Indulging in this data treasure hunt felt like a game of Name That Tune, except instead of melodies, we were hunting for numbers and trends. We compiled data spanning the years 2001 to 2021, creating a timeline that would illuminate any potential spark between the popularity of the name "Layne" and electricity generation.

Statistical Analysis:
With our treasure trove of data in hand, we summoned the statistical wizards among our research team to conjure up analyses that would leave us positively electrified. We calculated correlation coefficients, conducted regression analyses, and even threw in a few scatter plots for good measure. Our statistical toolbox resembled a magician's kit, with each method adding a layer of enchantment to our findings. Not to mention, mastering these statistical analyses definitely gave us a jolt of satisfaction, akin to solving a perplexing riddle.

Cross-Referencing and Verification:
As part of our rigorous approach, we cross-referenced our findings with existing literature on naming trends and energy production. This involved delving into scholarly journals, historical records, and the occasional quirky blog post on eclectic naming practices. We wanted to ensure that our findings weren't just a flash in the pan, but rather a sustained surge of evidence pointing towards the unlikely connection between the name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories.

Visualization and Interpretation:
To add a touch of visual flair to our findings, we unleashed our creative energies in designing compelling visualizations that would bring our data to life. Flowing charts, electrifying graphs, and perhaps the occasional pun-laden diagram - we aimed to capture the attention of even the most stoic reader. Our interpretations of the data danced between the realms of statistical significance and playful curiosity, much like a lively tango with science and whimsy as partners.

Ethical Considerations:
In line with ethical research practices, we ensured that the identities of individuals related to the name "Layne" were safeguarded and that the electricity generation data was presented accurately and responsibly. In this unconventional journey, we were mindful of maintaining the highest standards of integrity and respect for the individuals and communities at the heart of our investigation.

In conclusion, our methodology waltzed through the realms of statistical analysis, digital exploration, and a dash of creativity to present findings that would shock, surprise, and, hopefully, spark delight in our readers. This research adventure might have been off the beaten path, but the same can be said of many groundbreaking discoveries throughout history. As Albert Einstein once said, "The important thing is not to stop questioning." And we certainly didn't stop questioning, even when the topic ventured into the realm of electrifying baby names and power production.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2001 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8777155, r-squared of 0.7703845, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. As unconventional as it sounds, our research team delved into this shockingly intriguing relationship using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, shedding light on this electrifying phenomenon. The implications of these findings, though certainly unexpected, have the potential to spark further discussions in both the realms of naming trends and energy generation. Join us as we venture into this electrifying intersection of human identity and power production, where sparks of curiosity lead to illuminating discoveries.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome to a shockingly electrifying journey into the world of statistical analysis and amusing name phenomena! In this paper, we venture into uncharted territory to explore the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. While most research papers aim for conventional topics, we are here to spice things up and shed some light on this curious connection that will leave you positively charged with laughter and insight.
Picture this: a bunch of researchers sitting around, brainstorming wacky ideas, when suddenly someone blurts out, "Hey, what if there's a link between baby names and electricity production?" Well, brace yourself, because we actually took that idea and ran with it. We dived into the obscure depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, determined to uncover the mysteries lurking beneath this zappy relationship.
Now, you might be thinking, "How on earth does someone come up with the idea to study a connection between baby names and electricity generation?" Trust us, we had our doubts too, but we couldn't resist the opportunity to spark some excitement in the field of statistical analysis by uncovering this wattage-laden gem.
It's essential to note that our research is grounded in rigorous analysis, despite the hair-raising subject matter. We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 with p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, effectively illuminating this electrifying phenomenon. And no, that correlation coefficient is not a typo - it's as shocking as it sounds!
So, get ready to be electrified, as we embark on a journey through the ebb and flow of name popularity and energy production. This paper aims to demonstrate that, even in the realm of serious quantitative analysis, there's room for a bit of whimsy and unexpected discoveries. Buckle up, because it's going to be a hair-raising ride through the electrifying intersection of human identity and power production!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our findings illuminate an electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. The correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 reveals a strong positive relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.7703845, indicating that an electrifying 77.04% of the variance in electricity generation can be explained by the popularity of the name "Layne." Researchers were left buzzing with excitement by the statistical significance of p < 0.01, affirming the robustness of this unexpected connection.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot radiates with the striking correlation between the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. It's as if the data points themselves were crackling with energy, eager to showcase this jolting relationship. The graph is undoubtedly a sight to behold, provoking a sense of awe and wonder at the electrifying coherence between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's electrifyingly clear that this correlation is not to be taken lightly!

Upon uncovering this startling phenomenon, our research team was left wondering whether the spark of popularity behind the name "Layne" was somehow conjuring additional electrical energy in Palestinian Territories. Could it be that the mere utterance of the name "Layne" sends a surge of power coursing through the region's infrastructure? While these questions may sound far-fetched, the data suggest an undeniable relationship that has left our team positively charged with fascination.

It's important to note that these findings are not mere statistical sparks in the dark; they have the potential to illuminate new avenues of research at the intersection of naming trends and energy production. As scientists, we proudly embrace the electrifying nature of these results and invite fellow enthusiasts to join us in this energizing exploration of statistical quirks and unexpected discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. As unconventional as it sounds, our research team delved into this shockingly intriguing relationship using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, shedding light on this electrifying phenomenon. The implications of these findings, though certainly unexpected, have the potential to spark further discussions in both the realms of naming trends and energy generation. Join us as we venture into this electrifying intersection of human identity and power production, where sparks of curiosity lead to illuminating discoveries.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith, Doe, and Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive study on naming trends and societal influences, shedding light on the interconnected nature of personal nomenclature and cultural phenomena. Their research delves into the psychological and sociological implications of name popularity, presenting a thought-provoking analysis that sets the stage for understanding the electrifying correlation we aim to explore.
In "The Sparks of Naming: Unraveling the Mysteries of Identity" by Adams and Brown (2015), the authors delve into the historical, cultural, and psychological significance of naming practices. This insightful work provides a foundational understanding of the complexities inherent in the process of naming, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the shocking link between the name "Layne" and electricity generation.
On a more lighthearted note, "The Power of Names: A Shocking Tale" by Lightfoot and Watts (2018) offers an entertaining exploration of the whimsical connections between names and unexpected outcomes. While their work may lean towards the humorous side, it nevertheless presents intriguing insights that resonate with our study's unconventional approach.
As we journey into the realm of fiction, the classic novel "Electric Dreams" by Rivers and Watts (1984) takes readers on an electrifying adventure through an alternate reality where the power of names holds a mesmerizing sway over the fabric of existence. Though a work of fiction, the themes explored in this novel serve as a metaphorical backdrop for our investigation into the surprising relationship between the name "Layne" and electricity generation.
In a more contemporary context, the critically acclaimed TV show "Current Affairs" provides a captivating glimpse into the intricacies of energy production and distribution. While our viewing of this series was primarily for leisure, the insights gained from its portrayal of power generation served as an unexpected source of inspiration for our research endeavor.
Moving beyond the realm of scholarly literature, our foray into pop culture and entertainment underscores the multifaceted nature of the concepts we are exploring. As we synthesize these diverse perspectives into our analysis, we embrace the delightful synergy of the serious and the whimsical in our pursuit of understanding the electrifying correlation between the name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories.

[[RESULTS]]
Our findings illuminate an electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. The correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 reveals a strong positive relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.7703845, indicating that an electrifying 77.04% of the variance in electricity generation can be explained by the popularity of the name "Layne." Researchers were left buzzing with excitement by the statistical significance of p < 0.01, affirming the robustness of this unexpected connection.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot radiates with the striking correlation between the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. It's as if the data points themselves were crackling with energy, eager to showcase this jolting relationship. The graph is undoubtedly a sight to behold, provoking a sense of awe and wonder at the electrifying coherence between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's electrifyingly clear that this correlation is not to be taken lightly!
Upon uncovering this startling phenomenon, our research team was left wondering whether the spark of popularity behind the name "Layne" was somehow conjuring additional electrical energy in Palestinian Territories. Could it be that the mere utterance of the name "Layne" sends a surge of power coursing through the region's infrastructure? While these questions may sound far-fetched, the data suggest an undeniable relationship that has left our team positively charged with fascination.
It's important to note that these findings are not mere statistical sparks in the dark; they have the potential to illuminate new avenues of research at the intersection of naming trends and energy production. As scientists, we proudly embrace the electrifying nature of these results and invite fellow enthusiasts to join us in this energizing exploration of statistical quirks and unexpected discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The illuminating results of our study affirm the electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Our findings stand in harmony with prior research by Smith, Doe, and Jones (2020) and Adams and Brown (2015), both of which artfully laid the foundation for our exploration into the shocking link between personal nomenclature and power production. Although the inclusion of the more whimsical work of Lightfoot and Watts (2018) was initially seen as a lighthearted inclusion, the parallels between their "shocking" tale and our actual findings cannot be overlooked.

The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 resonates like a thunderclap, echoing the resounding influence of the name "Layne" on electricity generation. This robust correlation, as indicated by the r-squared value of 0.7703845, highlights the overwhelming power of this unexpected relationship, emphasizing that a whopping 77.04% of the variance in electricity generation can be attributed to the popularity of this electrifying name.

As we gaze upon the captivating scatterplot, it becomes abundantly clear that the connection between the name "Layne" and electricity generation is not simply a flicker in the statistical darkness; it's a full-blown electrical storm of significance. The crackling energy exuded by the data points symbolizes the undeniable synergy between these seemingly disparate entities, sparking awe and wonder as we grapple with the magnitude of this unexpected correlation. It's as if the graph itself is charged with the thrilling energy of discovery, inviting us to embrace this electrifying coherence of variables.

The lingering question of whether the mention of "Layne" has an actual impact on electricity generation may seem like a shocking hypothesis, but our findings undeniably point to an enigmatic relationship that has left us positively charged with curiosity. Furthermore, the implications of these results extend beyond statistical sparks; they hold the potential to blaze new trails at the intersection of naming trends and energy production, serving as a beacon of inspiration for future research endeavors.

In closing, the electrifying nature of our results serves as a testament to the captivating potential of statistical inquiry and the wondrous revelations it can unveil. As we bask in the glow of this unexpected correlation, we invite fellow enthusiasts to join us in this electrifying exploration of statistical quirks and the astonishing connections they unveil. After all, when it comes to research, it's always a shock to find meaningful relationships in unexpected places!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. As unconventional as it sounds, our research team delved into this shockingly intriguing relationship using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, shedding light on this electrifying phenomenon. The implications of these findings, though certainly unexpected, have the potential to spark further discussions in both the realms of naming trends and energy generation. Join us as we venture into this electrifying intersection of human identity and power production, where sparks of curiosity lead to illuminating discoveries.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome to a shockingly electrifying journey into the world of statistical analysis and amusing name phenomena! In this paper, we venture into uncharted territory to explore the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. While most research papers aim for conventional topics, we are here to spice things up and shed some light on this curious connection that will leave you positively charged with laughter and insight.
Picture this: a bunch of researchers sitting around, brainstorming wacky ideas, when suddenly someone blurts out, "Hey, what if there's a link between baby names and electricity production?" Well, brace yourself, because we actually took that idea and ran with it. We dived into the obscure depths of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, determined to uncover the mysteries lurking beneath this zappy relationship.
Now, you might be thinking, "How on earth does someone come up with the idea to study a connection between baby names and electricity generation?" Trust us, we had our doubts too, but we couldn't resist the opportunity to spark some excitement in the field of statistical analysis by uncovering this wattage-laden gem.
It's essential to note that our research is grounded in rigorous analysis, despite the hair-raising subject matter. We calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 with p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, effectively illuminating this electrifying phenomenon. And no, that correlation coefficient is not a typo - it's as shocking as it sounds!
So, get ready to be electrified, as we embark on a journey through the ebb and flow of name popularity and energy production. This paper aims to demonstrate that, even in the realm of serious quantitative analysis, there's room for a bit of whimsy and unexpected discoveries. Buckle up, because it's going to be a hair-raising ride through the electrifying intersection of human identity and power production!

[[RESULTS]]
Our findings illuminate an electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. The correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 reveals a strong positive relationship, with an r-squared value of 0.7703845, indicating that an electrifying 77.04% of the variance in electricity generation can be explained by the popularity of the name "Layne." Researchers were left buzzing with excitement by the statistical significance of p < 0.01, affirming the robustness of this unexpected connection.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot radiates with the striking correlation between the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. It's as if the data points themselves were crackling with energy, eager to showcase this jolting relationship. The graph is undoubtedly a sight to behold, provoking a sense of awe and wonder at the electrifying coherence between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's electrifyingly clear that this correlation is not to be taken lightly!
Upon uncovering this startling phenomenon, our research team was left wondering whether the spark of popularity behind the name "Layne" was somehow conjuring additional electrical energy in Palestinian Territories. Could it be that the mere utterance of the name "Layne" sends a surge of power coursing through the region's infrastructure? While these questions may sound far-fetched, the data suggest an undeniable relationship that has left our team positively charged with fascination.
It's important to note that these findings are not mere statistical sparks in the dark; they have the potential to illuminate new avenues of research at the intersection of naming trends and energy production. As scientists, we proudly embrace the electrifying nature of these results and invite fellow enthusiasts to join us in this energizing exploration of statistical quirks and unexpected discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has sparked a glowing revelation regarding the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. The illuminating correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and its zappy significance of p < 0.01 have left our team utterly charged with excitement. It's as if statistical analysis and baby names collided in a flurry of electrical currents, leaving us both shocked and electrified by the results.

The prospect of a name exuding such a potent influence on energy production may seem far-fetched, but the data don't lie – this correlation is the real deal. It's as if the name "Layne" carries a powerful charge that electrifies the very fabric of energy generation in Palestinian Territories. Who knew that a simple name could wield such electrifying influence?

As we wrap up this hair-raising adventure, it's clear that no more research is needed in this particular area. Our findings stand as a testament to the electrifying potential of unexpected connections, and we proudly charge forward, knowing that we have shed light on a truly shocking phenomenon.

So, as we bid adieu to the electrifying world of Laynes and electricity, we encourage fellow researchers and enthusiasts to embrace the sparks of curiosity and uncover their own illuminating discoveries. After all, who knows what other hair-raising connections are waiting to be unearthed in the electrifying realm of statistical whimsy and unexpected correlations?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Electrifying Sociolinguistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Quirky Research Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Popularity of the Name 'Layne' and its Impact on Electricity Generation in Palestinian Territories with an abstract of This research paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Layne" and electricity generation in Palestinian Territories. As unconventional as it sounds, our research team delved into this shockingly intriguing relationship using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8777155 and p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, shedding light on this electrifying phenomenon. The implications of these findings, though certainly unexpected, have the potential to spark further discussions in both the realms of naming trends and energy generation. Join us as we venture into this electrifying intersection of human identity and power production, where sparks of curiosity lead to illuminating discoveries.

ChatGPT:

"Layne" popularity, electricity generation, Palestinian Territories, correlation coefficient, social security administration data, energy information administration data, naming trends, power production, identity and power, electricity consumption, data analysis, naming correlations, energy statistics.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Layne
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Layne
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Layne

Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Palestinian Territories in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories

Correlation r = 0.8777155 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7703845 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Layne) over the 21 years from 2001 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-7. 0.0000001725961797079913000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 1.7E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,793,871 random variables You don't actually need 5 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Layne (Babies born)311372455429429442436474491503516512499511441413444433614672765
Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories (Billion kWh)0.0330.140.3210.3710.470.3240.3920.40.470.4450.5350.4340.503960.319780.48370.50830.516570.3986760.7728160.7949910.85646




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([311,372,455,429,429,442,436,474,491,503,516,512,499,511,441,413,444,433,614,672,765,])
array_2 = np.array([0.033,0.14,0.321,0.371,0.47,0.324,0.392,0.4,0.47,0.445,0.535,0.434,0.50396,0.31978,0.4837,0.5083,0.51657,0.398676,0.772816,0.794991,0.85646,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Layne"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Palestinian Territories"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 1875 · Black Variable ID: 3176 · Red Variable ID: 23885
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0