Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the knowledge cultivation in Kansas became scarce, it led to a crop in innovative farming practices. Without enough ag-science teachers to help them branch out, the farmers had to mulch over to more sustainable methods, reducing their reliance on fossil fuels. It seems the root of the issue in North Macedonia's fossil fuel use was actually sprouting all the way over in Kansas. This just goes to show, when it comes to global impact, every stalk and roll counts!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a black-and-white newspaper illustration. Depict a bustling classroom at a Kansas agricultural college where students are engaged in hands-on learning with soil samples and farm equipment under the guidance of dedicated agricultural sciences teachers. Simultaneously, depict a group of people working at a fossil fuel extraction site in North Macedonia, with trucks and machinery busy extracting and processing the fuel. Capture the contrast between the agricultural learning environment and the industrial nature of the fuel extraction site. Focus on detailing the activities in the classroom and the workings of the extraction site, maintaining a simple and clear visual presentation. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Glitch art A Discovery magazine cover image a Polaroid photo A black-and-white newspaper illustration
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling classroom at a Kansas agricultural college, a group of students are engaged in hands-on learning with soil samples and farm equipment, under the guidance of a few dedicated agricultural sciences teachers. Meanwhile, across the globe in North Macedonia, a group of people are working at a fossil fuel extraction site, with trucks and machinery busy extracting and processing the fuel.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling classroom at a Kansas agricultural college, a group of students are engaged in hands-on learning with soil samples and farm equipment, under the guidance of a few dedicated agricultural sciences teachers. Meanwhile, across the globe in North Macedonia, a group of people are working at a fossil fuel extraction site, with trucks and machinery busy extracting and processing the fuel. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a black-and-white newspaper illustration. Depict a bustling classroom at a Kansas agricultural college where students are engaged in hands-on learning with soil samples and farm equipment under the guidance of dedicated agricultural sciences teachers. Simultaneously, depict a group of people working at a fossil fuel extraction site in North Macedonia, with trucks and machinery busy extracting and processing the fuel. Capture the contrast between the agricultural learning environment and the industrial nature of the fuel extraction site. Focus on detailing the activities in the classroom and the workings of the extraction site, maintaining a simple and clear visual presentation.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas caused Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia to decrease. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great The Journal of Agrarian Sciences and Ethno-ecological Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the unforeseen link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the fossil fuel use in the land of ancient civilizations. The study employs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, drawing connections that are more intriguing than a maize maze. The results illuminate a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2005 to 2021, rendering this association statistically significant and worthy of furrowed brows and raised fossil-fueled eyebrows alike. This paper uncovers an unexpected relationship that may plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the unforeseen link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the fossil fuel use in the land of ancient civilizations. The study employs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, drawing connections that are more intriguing than a maize maze. The results illuminate a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2005 to 2021, rendering this association statistically significant and worthy of furrowed brows and raised fossil-fueled eyebrows alike. This paper uncovers an unexpected relationship that may plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy is a fertile ground for exploration, with the plowshares of agricultural sciences educators tilling fields and the fossil fuels of modern industrialization fueling everything from tractors to transport. This study delves into the intriguing interplay between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America, specifically Kansas, and the fossil fuel consumption in the land of ancient civilizations, North Macedonia. While at first glance these topics may seem as mismatched as cows in a cabbage patch, our research has unearthed a relationship more interconnected than a root system in rich, loamy soil.
As we embark on this academic adventure, it is essential to recognize the significance of agricultural sciences as the bedrock of the Corn State's educational landscape. Kansas, often referred to as the "Breadbasket of the World," boasts a deep-rooted tradition in agricultural education, providing the seeds of knowledge to the next generation of farmers, agriculturists, and stewards of the land. Meanwhile, North Macedonia, formerly a part of an empire stretching from Greece to India under the leadership of none other than the legendary Alexander the Great, now finds itself entwined with the contemporary challenge of navigating fossil fuel consumption in the modern era.
Over the years, statistical analyses of agricultural education have often focused on crop yields, farming techniques, and economic impacts, but the correlation with fossil fuel use has been left unturned, like a forgotten furrow in the field. We propose to bridge this gap by investigating the unexpected link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and the consumption of fossil fuels in North Macedonia, shedding light on a relationship that is both statistically significant and intellectually captivating.
Our paper aims to dig deeper into this correlation, examining the data from 2005 to 2021, plowing through the numbers with the precision of a combine harvester. The statistical results have reaped a correlation coefficient of 0.8380090, akin to the robustness of well-fertilized crops, and a p-value that is as rare as a blue moon in a clear sky.
As we embark on this agricultural odyssey, it is our hope that the findings of this research will cultivate a greater understanding of the complex interdependence between agricultural education and fossil fuel consumption, uprooting new insights and sowing the seeds of further exploration in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies. Join us as we venture beyond the traditional boundaries of academic inquiry, plowing through conventional thinking and cultivating a harvest of knowledge that transcends disciplinary borders.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the unforeseen link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the fossil fuel use in the land of ancient civilizations. The study employs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, drawing connections that are more intriguing than a maize maze. The results illuminate a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2005 to 2021, rendering this association statistically significant and worthy of furrowed brows and raised fossil-fueled eyebrows alike. This paper uncovers an unexpected relationship that may plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy is a fertile ground for exploration, with the plowshares of agricultural sciences educators tilling fields and the fossil fuels of modern industrialization fueling everything from tractors to transport. This study delves into the intriguing interplay between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America, specifically Kansas, and the fossil fuel consumption in the land of ancient civilizations, North Macedonia. While at first glance these topics may seem as mismatched as cows in a cabbage patch, our research has unearthed a relationship more interconnected than a root system in rich, loamy soil.
As we embark on this academic adventure, it is essential to recognize the significance of agricultural sciences as the bedrock of the Corn State's educational landscape. Kansas, often referred to as the "Breadbasket of the World," boasts a deep-rooted tradition in agricultural education, providing the seeds of knowledge to the next generation of farmers, agriculturists, and stewards of the land. Meanwhile, North Macedonia, formerly a part of an empire stretching from Greece to India under the leadership of none other than the legendary Alexander the Great, now finds itself entwined with the contemporary challenge of navigating fossil fuel consumption in the modern era.
Over the years, statistical analyses of agricultural education have often focused on crop yields, farming techniques, and economic impacts, but the correlation with fossil fuel use has been left unturned, like a forgotten furrow in the field. We propose to bridge this gap by investigating the unexpected link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and the consumption of fossil fuels in North Macedonia, shedding light on a relationship that is both statistically significant and intellectually captivating.
Our paper aims to dig deeper into this correlation, examining the data from 2005 to 2021, plowing through the numbers with the precision of a combine harvester. The statistical results have reaped a correlation coefficient of 0.8380090, akin to the robustness of well-fertilized crops, and a p-value that is as rare as a blue moon in a clear sky.
As we embark on this agricultural odyssey, it is our hope that the findings of this research will cultivate a greater understanding of the complex interdependence between agricultural education and fossil fuel consumption, uprooting new insights and sowing the seeds of further exploration in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies. Join us as we venture beyond the traditional boundaries of academic inquiry, plowing through conventional thinking and cultivating a harvest of knowledge that transcends disciplinary borders.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study "The Role of Agricultural Sciences Education in Modern Society," Smith and colleagues examine the impact of agricultural sciences teachers on the cultivation of knowledge and skills in the field of agriculture. The authors find that the presence of qualified educators is essential for nurturing the next generation of agricultural professionals, planting the seeds of success in the fertile minds of students. Meanwhile, Doe et al., in "Fossil Fuel Consumption and Its Ramifications," delve into the intricate web of fossil fuel use and its far-reaching implications on environmental and economic landscapes. Their findings underscore the undeniable influence of fossil fuels on modern society, igniting discussions as heated as a biomass-derived flame.
Extending the discourse beyond conventional academic research, non-fiction works such as "Agricultural Economics: Principles and Policy" by Jones and "The Looming Energy Crisis" by Brown contribute valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of agricultural education and energy consumption. These scholarly works offer a comprehensive analysis of the agricultural sector and energy trends, shedding light on the multifaceted layers of this enigmatic connection.
Furthermore, fiction books with titles such as "Harvesting Hope" by Green and "The Fuel Dilemma" by Black add a captivating narrative to the intertwining themes of agriculture and energy. While these fictional tales may not offer empirical evidence, they cultivate a sense of curiosity and wonder about the potential interactions between these seemingly disparate domains.
Driven by a commitment to exhaust all possible sources, the literature review process also led to unconventional resources, including the buried treasure of wisdom found in the enigmatic CVS receipts. Though initially received with raised eyebrows, these oft-disregarded artifacts surprisingly yielded scintillating data points, ranging from fertilizer purchases to fuel transactions, evoking more questions than answers.
Alas, the journey through the literary landscape has been as unpredictable as the Kansas weather, but the findings have been as illuminating as a sunflower field at dawn. In the quest to unravel the interplay between agricultural sciences education and fossil fuel consumption, the literature review has unearthed a tapestry of knowledge that stretches as far and wide as the fields of Kansas and the lands of North Macedonia. We now turn to the empirical analysis, armed with the wisdom of academia and the occasional whimsy of fiction, to cultivate a compelling narrative of this unexpected correlation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2005 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the unforeseen link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the fossil fuel use in the land of ancient civilizations. The study employs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, drawing connections that are more intriguing than a maize maze. The results illuminate a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2005 to 2021, rendering this association statistically significant and worthy of furrowed brows and raised fossil-fueled eyebrows alike. This paper uncovers an unexpected relationship that may plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy is a fertile ground for exploration, with the plowshares of agricultural sciences educators tilling fields and the fossil fuels of modern industrialization fueling everything from tractors to transport. This study delves into the intriguing interplay between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America, specifically Kansas, and the fossil fuel consumption in the land of ancient civilizations, North Macedonia. While at first glance these topics may seem as mismatched as cows in a cabbage patch, our research has unearthed a relationship more interconnected than a root system in rich, loamy soil.
As we embark on this academic adventure, it is essential to recognize the significance of agricultural sciences as the bedrock of the Corn State's educational landscape. Kansas, often referred to as the "Breadbasket of the World," boasts a deep-rooted tradition in agricultural education, providing the seeds of knowledge to the next generation of farmers, agriculturists, and stewards of the land. Meanwhile, North Macedonia, formerly a part of an empire stretching from Greece to India under the leadership of none other than the legendary Alexander the Great, now finds itself entwined with the contemporary challenge of navigating fossil fuel consumption in the modern era.
Over the years, statistical analyses of agricultural education have often focused on crop yields, farming techniques, and economic impacts, but the correlation with fossil fuel use has been left unturned, like a forgotten furrow in the field. We propose to bridge this gap by investigating the unexpected link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and the consumption of fossil fuels in North Macedonia, shedding light on a relationship that is both statistically significant and intellectually captivating.
Our paper aims to dig deeper into this correlation, examining the data from 2005 to 2021, plowing through the numbers with the precision of a combine harvester. The statistical results have reaped a correlation coefficient of 0.8380090, akin to the robustness of well-fertilized crops, and a p-value that is as rare as a blue moon in a clear sky.
As we embark on this agricultural odyssey, it is our hope that the findings of this research will cultivate a greater understanding of the complex interdependence between agricultural education and fossil fuel consumption, uprooting new insights and sowing the seeds of further exploration in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies. Join us as we venture beyond the traditional boundaries of academic inquiry, plowing through conventional thinking and cultivating a harvest of knowledge that transcends disciplinary borders.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unearth the connection between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the consumption of fossil fuels in the land of ancient civilizations, we employed a methodological approach that can only be likened to navigating a maze of maize. Our research team scoured the expanse of the internet, akin to farmers searching for the ripest crop, and extracted data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and the Energy Information Administration for fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. We then tilled the data from 2005 to 2021, ensuring a thorough examination akin to the meticulous sowing of seeds in spring.
The quantitative analysis commenced with a correlation test that plowed through the numerical fields, revealing a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8380090, akin to a stalk of corn standing tall amidst the fields. This coefficient, while not as visible as a silo on the horizon, signifies a strong relationship between the two variables under investigation. Our statistical analysis, akin to precision agriculture, also yielded a remarkable p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of the observed correlation.
Further, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted a sensitivity analysis akin to testing the soil for optimal planting conditions. This analysis involved examining subsets of the data, varietals akin to different seed types, to verify the consistency of the observed correlation across distinct time periods. Our procedural approach was as meticulous as the best agronomist, ensuring that our findings were not merely happenstance, but rather akin to a consistent yield across varied fields and conditions.
In addition, we employed a regression analysis that delved deeper into the relationship, akin to probing the soil for hidden nutrients. This regression model sought to unearth the specific impact of the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas on fossil fuel consumption in North Macedonia, accounting for potential confounding variables that might cloud the verdant landscape of our results. The model, not unlike a sophisticated plow, turned over the soil of the data, revealing nuanced insights that may have otherwise lain dormant.
In summary, our approach to this research has been akin to the art and science of agriculture itself – methodical, rigorous, and with an eye toward cultivating a rich harvest of knowledge. We have employed statistical tools as our plows, turning over the fertile fields of data to reveal a correlation that is as compelling as it is unexpected. Our methodology, much like a well-tended farm, has aimed to yield results that not only bear fruit today but also sow the seeds of future inquiry in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 2005 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8380090, r-squared of 0.7022592, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the unforeseen link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the fossil fuel use in the land of ancient civilizations. The study employs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, drawing connections that are more intriguing than a maize maze. The results illuminate a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2005 to 2021, rendering this association statistically significant and worthy of furrowed brows and raised fossil-fueled eyebrows alike. This paper uncovers an unexpected relationship that may plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy is a fertile ground for exploration, with the plowshares of agricultural sciences educators tilling fields and the fossil fuels of modern industrialization fueling everything from tractors to transport. This study delves into the intriguing interplay between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America, specifically Kansas, and the fossil fuel consumption in the land of ancient civilizations, North Macedonia. While at first glance these topics may seem as mismatched as cows in a cabbage patch, our research has unearthed a relationship more interconnected than a root system in rich, loamy soil.
As we embark on this academic adventure, it is essential to recognize the significance of agricultural sciences as the bedrock of the Corn State's educational landscape. Kansas, often referred to as the "Breadbasket of the World," boasts a deep-rooted tradition in agricultural education, providing the seeds of knowledge to the next generation of farmers, agriculturists, and stewards of the land. Meanwhile, North Macedonia, formerly a part of an empire stretching from Greece to India under the leadership of none other than the legendary Alexander the Great, now finds itself entwined with the contemporary challenge of navigating fossil fuel consumption in the modern era.
Over the years, statistical analyses of agricultural education have often focused on crop yields, farming techniques, and economic impacts, but the correlation with fossil fuel use has been left unturned, like a forgotten furrow in the field. We propose to bridge this gap by investigating the unexpected link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and the consumption of fossil fuels in North Macedonia, shedding light on a relationship that is both statistically significant and intellectually captivating.
Our paper aims to dig deeper into this correlation, examining the data from 2005 to 2021, plowing through the numbers with the precision of a combine harvester. The statistical results have reaped a correlation coefficient of 0.8380090, akin to the robustness of well-fertilized crops, and a p-value that is as rare as a blue moon in a clear sky.
As we embark on this agricultural odyssey, it is our hope that the findings of this research will cultivate a greater understanding of the complex interdependence between agricultural education and fossil fuel consumption, uprooting new insights and sowing the seeds of further exploration in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies. Join us as we venture beyond the traditional boundaries of academic inquiry, plowing through conventional thinking and cultivating a harvest of knowledge that transcends disciplinary borders.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting the statistical analysis, the data revealed a striking correlation between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This discovery is more surprising than finding a tractor in a sea of oil wells.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7022592 indicates that approximately 70% of the variability in fossil fuel use in North Macedonia can be explained by the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas. This high r-squared value highlights the significant impact of agricultural education on energy consumption, leaving us more awe-struck than a farmer witnessing a bountiful harvest after a rainy season.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 attests to the statistical significance of this relationship. This level of significance rules out the possibility that this strong correlation may have occurred by chance, reassuring us that this finding is as reliable as a well-maintained tractor chugging through a sun-drenched field.
To visually illustrate this robust correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included, depicting the clear positive association between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. This relationship is so compelling that it could attract more attention than free fertilizer at a farming convention.
In summary, the results of this research uncover an unexpected bond between the agricultural education heartland of Kansas and the fossil fuel consumption in North Macedonia. This discovery has the potential to plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies, shedding light on an intricately interwoven relationship that is as captivating as a rare hybrid seed.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the unforeseen link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the fossil fuel use in the land of ancient civilizations. The study employs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, drawing connections that are more intriguing than a maize maze. The results illuminate a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2005 to 2021, rendering this association statistically significant and worthy of furrowed brows and raised fossil-fueled eyebrows alike. This paper uncovers an unexpected relationship that may plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study "The Role of Agricultural Sciences Education in Modern Society," Smith and colleagues examine the impact of agricultural sciences teachers on the cultivation of knowledge and skills in the field of agriculture. The authors find that the presence of qualified educators is essential for nurturing the next generation of agricultural professionals, planting the seeds of success in the fertile minds of students. Meanwhile, Doe et al., in "Fossil Fuel Consumption and Its Ramifications," delve into the intricate web of fossil fuel use and its far-reaching implications on environmental and economic landscapes. Their findings underscore the undeniable influence of fossil fuels on modern society, igniting discussions as heated as a biomass-derived flame.
Extending the discourse beyond conventional academic research, non-fiction works such as "Agricultural Economics: Principles and Policy" by Jones and "The Looming Energy Crisis" by Brown contribute valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of agricultural education and energy consumption. These scholarly works offer a comprehensive analysis of the agricultural sector and energy trends, shedding light on the multifaceted layers of this enigmatic connection.
Furthermore, fiction books with titles such as "Harvesting Hope" by Green and "The Fuel Dilemma" by Black add a captivating narrative to the intertwining themes of agriculture and energy. While these fictional tales may not offer empirical evidence, they cultivate a sense of curiosity and wonder about the potential interactions between these seemingly disparate domains.
Driven by a commitment to exhaust all possible sources, the literature review process also led to unconventional resources, including the buried treasure of wisdom found in the enigmatic CVS receipts. Though initially received with raised eyebrows, these oft-disregarded artifacts surprisingly yielded scintillating data points, ranging from fertilizer purchases to fuel transactions, evoking more questions than answers.
Alas, the journey through the literary landscape has been as unpredictable as the Kansas weather, but the findings have been as illuminating as a sunflower field at dawn. In the quest to unravel the interplay between agricultural sciences education and fossil fuel consumption, the literature review has unearthed a tapestry of knowledge that stretches as far and wide as the fields of Kansas and the lands of North Macedonia. We now turn to the empirical analysis, armed with the wisdom of academia and the occasional whimsy of fiction, to cultivate a compelling narrative of this unexpected correlation.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting the statistical analysis, the data revealed a striking correlation between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This discovery is more surprising than finding a tractor in a sea of oil wells.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7022592 indicates that approximately 70% of the variability in fossil fuel use in North Macedonia can be explained by the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas. This high r-squared value highlights the significant impact of agricultural education on energy consumption, leaving us more awe-struck than a farmer witnessing a bountiful harvest after a rainy season.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 attests to the statistical significance of this relationship. This level of significance rules out the possibility that this strong correlation may have occurred by chance, reassuring us that this finding is as reliable as a well-maintained tractor chugging through a sun-drenched field.
To visually illustrate this robust correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included, depicting the clear positive association between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. This relationship is so compelling that it could attract more attention than free fertilizer at a farming convention.
In summary, the results of this research uncover an unexpected bond between the agricultural education heartland of Kansas and the fossil fuel consumption in North Macedonia. This discovery has the potential to plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies, shedding light on an intricately interwoven relationship that is as captivating as a rare hybrid seed.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
The results of this study substantially support the existing literature, highlighting the intriguing connection between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Smith and colleagues emphasized the crucial role of agricultural educators in fostering knowledge and skills in the field of agriculture. Our findings indeed validate the significance of this role, suggesting a strong positive relationship between the abundance of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and the consumption of fossil fuels in North Macedonia.
Doe et al.'s investigation into fossil fuel consumption and its repercussions is further corroborated by our study, as we have unveiled a substantial correlation between the presence of agricultural educators in the heartland of America and the utilization of fossil fuels in the lands of Alexander the Great. This unexpected association lends support to the undeniable influence of fossil fuels on modern society, underscoring the intricate web of energy consumption and its far-reaching implications.
Furthermore, the non-fiction works by Jones and Brown, along with the contributions of Green and Black, have laid the groundwork for our understanding of the dynamic interplay between agricultural education and energy consumption. While our findings might seem as improbable as finding a tractor in a sea of oil wells, the robust correlation coefficient and statistical significance of our results vouch for the credibility and gravity of this unexpected relationship.
Our study not only confirms the speculation from prior research but also goes beyond conventional academic investigation to venture into unexplored territories, akin to the unpredictable Kansas weather. The literature review, which unearthed unconventional resources, including the wisdom found in the enigmatic CVS receipts, has set the stage for our empirical analysis, paving the way for a comprehensive understanding of the intricate dynamics between agricultural sciences education and fossil fuel consumption.
In essence, our research illuminates a compelling narrative that stretches as far and wide as the fields of Kansas and the lands of North Macedonia. This unexpected correlation broadens the horizons of agricultural economics and energy studies, offering a new lens through which to view the relationship between seemingly disparate domains. While the subject matter at hand is as serious as a well-maintained tractor, our findings leave room for a touch of whimsy and wonder, akin to stumbling upon a rare hybrid seed in a vast sunflower field.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the unforeseen link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the fossil fuel use in the land of ancient civilizations. The study employs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, drawing connections that are more intriguing than a maize maze. The results illuminate a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2005 to 2021, rendering this association statistically significant and worthy of furrowed brows and raised fossil-fueled eyebrows alike. This paper uncovers an unexpected relationship that may plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and energy is a fertile ground for exploration, with the plowshares of agricultural sciences educators tilling fields and the fossil fuels of modern industrialization fueling everything from tractors to transport. This study delves into the intriguing interplay between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America, specifically Kansas, and the fossil fuel consumption in the land of ancient civilizations, North Macedonia. While at first glance these topics may seem as mismatched as cows in a cabbage patch, our research has unearthed a relationship more interconnected than a root system in rich, loamy soil.
As we embark on this academic adventure, it is essential to recognize the significance of agricultural sciences as the bedrock of the Corn State's educational landscape. Kansas, often referred to as the "Breadbasket of the World," boasts a deep-rooted tradition in agricultural education, providing the seeds of knowledge to the next generation of farmers, agriculturists, and stewards of the land. Meanwhile, North Macedonia, formerly a part of an empire stretching from Greece to India under the leadership of none other than the legendary Alexander the Great, now finds itself entwined with the contemporary challenge of navigating fossil fuel consumption in the modern era.
Over the years, statistical analyses of agricultural education have often focused on crop yields, farming techniques, and economic impacts, but the correlation with fossil fuel use has been left unturned, like a forgotten furrow in the field. We propose to bridge this gap by investigating the unexpected link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and the consumption of fossil fuels in North Macedonia, shedding light on a relationship that is both statistically significant and intellectually captivating.
Our paper aims to dig deeper into this correlation, examining the data from 2005 to 2021, plowing through the numbers with the precision of a combine harvester. The statistical results have reaped a correlation coefficient of 0.8380090, akin to the robustness of well-fertilized crops, and a p-value that is as rare as a blue moon in a clear sky.
As we embark on this agricultural odyssey, it is our hope that the findings of this research will cultivate a greater understanding of the complex interdependence between agricultural education and fossil fuel consumption, uprooting new insights and sowing the seeds of further exploration in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies. Join us as we venture beyond the traditional boundaries of academic inquiry, plowing through conventional thinking and cultivating a harvest of knowledge that transcends disciplinary borders.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting the statistical analysis, the data revealed a striking correlation between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This discovery is more surprising than finding a tractor in a sea of oil wells.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7022592 indicates that approximately 70% of the variability in fossil fuel use in North Macedonia can be explained by the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas. This high r-squared value highlights the significant impact of agricultural education on energy consumption, leaving us more awe-struck than a farmer witnessing a bountiful harvest after a rainy season.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 attests to the statistical significance of this relationship. This level of significance rules out the possibility that this strong correlation may have occurred by chance, reassuring us that this finding is as reliable as a well-maintained tractor chugging through a sun-drenched field.
To visually illustrate this robust correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included, depicting the clear positive association between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas and fossil fuel use in North Macedonia. This relationship is so compelling that it could attract more attention than free fertilizer at a farming convention.
In summary, the results of this research uncover an unexpected bond between the agricultural education heartland of Kansas and the fossil fuel consumption in North Macedonia. This discovery has the potential to plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies, shedding light on an intricately interwoven relationship that is as captivating as a rare hybrid seed.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has plowed through the fields of agricultural education and energy studies, unearthing a correlation between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and fossil fuel consumption in the land of ancient civilizations. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 has uprooted conventional thinking, showcasing a connection more intertwined than a bundle of vines in a vineyard.
This unexpected relationship leaves us as perplexed as a scarecrow in a windstorm, but nevertheless, it presents an exciting avenue for further exploration. The high coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7022592 highlights the substantial impact of agricultural education on energy usage in North Macedonia, a revelation as delightful as finding a pot of gold at the end of a maize maze.
The inclusion of the scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicts the positive association with such clarity that even a mole with poor eyesight could see it. To put it plainly, the number of agricultural science teachers in Kansas is not just "corn-ecting" the minds of future farmers, but it appears to be cultivating a significant impact on fossil fuel consumption in North Macedonia.
In light of these findings, it is clear that further research in this area is not just a luxury, it is a necessity. The correlation uncovered in this study demands attention, much like a flock of seagulls eyeing a freshly plowed field. It is time to delve deeper into this unexpected nexus, sowing the seeds of knowledge to enrich the yield of insights in agricultural economics and energy studies. As for the connection between Kansas and North Macedonia, it seems we've ploughed through the fields of statistical analysis and uncovered a correlation as robust as a prize-winning pumpkin at the county fair.
Therefore, I assert that no further research is needed in this area.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Agrarian Sciences and Ethno-ecological Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Association for Agricultural Anthropology and Archeology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great with an abstract of This research delves into the unforeseen link between the number of agricultural sciences teachers in the heart of America and the fossil fuel use in the land of ancient civilizations. The study employs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, drawing connections that are more intriguing than a maize maze. The results illuminate a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8380090 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2005 to 2021, rendering this association statistically significant and worthy of furrowed brows and raised fossil-fueled eyebrows alike. This paper uncovers an unexpected relationship that may plow new furrows in the fields of agricultural economics and energy studies.
ChatGPT:
agricultural sciences educators, corn state, fossil fuel consumption, land of Alexander the Great, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, 2005-2021, agricultural economics, energy studies
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of agricultural sciences teachers in KansasDetailed data title: BLS estimate of agricultural sciences teachers, postsecondary in Kansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas
Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in North Macedonia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7022592 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas) over the 17 years from 2005 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-5. 0.0000267244513485043240000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.0027% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 37,419 random variables You don't actually need 37 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.6, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas (Laborers) | 390 | 400 | 360 | 510 | 520 | 520 | 390 | 390 | 370 | 40 | 60 | 70 | 250 | 240 | 240 | 230 | 210 |
Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia (Billion kWh) | 5.12582 | 5.03746 | 5.15872 | 5.14274 | 5.22452 | 4.53926 | 5.0055 | 4.90492 | 4.23094 | 3.83708 | 3.26992 | 3.24853 | 3.9582 | 3.33858 | 4.16962 | 3.56764 | 3.59928 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([390,400,360,510,520,520,390,390,370,40,60,70,250,240,240,230,210,])
array_2 = np.array([5.12582,5.03746,5.15872,5.14274,5.22452,4.53926,5.0055,4.90492,4.23094,3.83708,3.26992,3.24853,3.9582,3.33858,4.16962,3.56764,3.59928,])
array_1_name = "The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of agricultural sciences teachers in Kansas
- Line chart for only Fossil fuel use in North Macedonia
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Tilling Fields, Fueling Fossils: Unearthing the Interplay Between Agricultural Sciences Educators in the Corn State and Fossil Fuel Consumption in the Land of Alexander the Great
You're a rater extraordinaire!
Correlation ID: 1856 · Black Variable ID: 17578 · Red Variable ID: 23873