about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,855 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO soybeans in Illinois were so advanced that even the internet couldn't handle it, leading people to exclaim, "I can't even, this soy is out of this world!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that appears to be a cinematic scene from a sci-fi space adventure. The scene contains a sprawling, otherworldly landscape with an endless expanse of alien soybean fields. In the forefront, an intergalactic farmer, dressed in futuristic attire, stands by a sign denoting "Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Soybeans." On one side, a character immersed in advanced technology leans against a sophisticated space tractor, engrossed in a holographic device, while conducting a search for "i can't even." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Celtic art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cyber folk Steampunk
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A vast soybean field in Illinois stretches out under a clear blue sky. In the foreground, a farmer stands next to a sign that reads "GMO soybeans." On the side, a person with a phone is leaning against a tractor, searching "i can't even" on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: A vast soybean field in Illinois stretches out under a clear blue sky. In the foreground, a farmer stands next to a sign that reads "GMO soybeans." On the side, a person with a phone is leaning against a tractor, searching "i can't even" on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that appears to be a cinematic scene from a sci-fi space adventure. The scene contains a sprawling, otherworldly landscape with an endless expanse of alien soybean fields. In the forefront, an intergalactic farmer, dressed in futuristic attire, stands by a sign denoting "Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Soybeans." On one side, a character immersed in advanced technology leans against a sophisticated space tractor, engrossed in a holographic device, while conducting a search for "i can't even."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Illinois caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. By diving into the data from the USDA and Google Trends, we aim to shed light on this peculiar but captivating relationship. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022, highlighting the robustness of the connection.

In a soybean field, one can only hope the soybeans are 'growing' the way they're supposed to. On the other hand, it's remarkable how the emotional upheavals corresponding to 'i can't even' seem to be intertwined with the cultivation of these soybeans. The positive correlation between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches suggests that there may be a latent link between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation. It's as if the soybeans are quietly influencing the emotional state of the populace, or perhaps it's the other way around!

Our results underscore the need for further investigation and lend credence to the idea that agricultural and technological developments have unforeseen implications on human behavior. As we delve deeper into this peculiar and unexpected connection, we may stumble upon insights that are both scientifically valuable and remarkably amusing. For now, let's just say that the next time you encounter GMO soybeans in Illinois, take a moment to ponder the hidden emotional rollercoaster they may be setting in motion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. By diving into the data from the USDA and Google Trends, we aim to shed light on this peculiar but captivating relationship. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022, highlighting the robustness of the connection.

In a soybean field, one can only hope the soybeans are 'growing' the way they're supposed to. On the other hand, it's remarkable how the emotional upheavals corresponding to 'i can't even' seem to be intertwined with the cultivation of these soybeans. The positive correlation between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches suggests that there may be a latent link between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation. It's as if the soybeans are quietly influencing the emotional state of the populace, or perhaps it's the other way around!

Our results underscore the need for further investigation and lend credence to the idea that agricultural and technological developments have unforeseen implications on human behavior. As we delve deeper into this peculiar and unexpected connection, we may stumble upon insights that are both scientifically valuable and remarkably amusing. For now, let's just say that the next time you encounter GMO soybeans in Illinois, take a moment to ponder the hidden emotional rollercoaster they may be setting in motion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As we delve into the captivating world of agricultural and technological correlations, we stumbled upon a peculiar and unexpected connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even' in Illinois. It's as if these soybeans are cultivating not just crops, but also a bizarre emotional landscape. With a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings have left us exclaiming, "Soy much drama!"

The revelation of this correlation has sparked a fair amount of curiosity and skepticism. Some may wonder if these soybeans are secretly whispering "i can't even" to their neighboring crops, while others may question if the exasperated internet users are inadvertently affecting the molecular structure of these soybeans. It's a tangled web of agricultural and emotional expression, tantamount to a dad joke that just can't be ignored.

Unraveling the mystery behind this correlation sheds light on the broader implications of agricultural practices on human behavior. It reminds us that the tangential effects of technological advancements can be as surprising as finding a soybean in a cornfield – which in our case, was not a result of cross-pollination, but rather a peculiar correlation.

In this paper, we aim to not only present the statistical evidence of this intriguing connection but also to indulge in a lighthearted exploration of its implications. As we navigate through the labyrinth of GMO soybeans and internet exasperation, we hope to unearth insights that are not only scientifically valuable but also surprisingly entertaining.

So, let's embark on this journey with a soyful of curiosity and a willingness to embrace the humor that comes with exploring the unexpected intersections of agriculture and human emotions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. By diving into the data from the USDA and Google Trends, we aim to shed light on this peculiar but captivating relationship. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022, highlighting the robustness of the connection.

In a soybean field, one can only hope the soybeans are 'growing' the way they're supposed to. On the other hand, it's remarkable how the emotional upheavals corresponding to 'i can't even' seem to be intertwined with the cultivation of these soybeans. The positive correlation between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches suggests that there may be a latent link between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation. It's as if the soybeans are quietly influencing the emotional state of the populace, or perhaps it's the other way around!

Our results underscore the need for further investigation and lend credence to the idea that agricultural and technological developments have unforeseen implications on human behavior. As we delve deeper into this peculiar and unexpected connection, we may stumble upon insights that are both scientifically valuable and remarkably amusing. For now, let's just say that the next time you encounter GMO soybeans in Illinois, take a moment to ponder the hidden emotional rollercoaster they may be setting in motion.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we delve into the captivating world of agricultural and technological correlations, we stumbled upon a peculiar and unexpected connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even' in Illinois. It's as if these soybeans are cultivating not just crops, but also a bizarre emotional landscape. With a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings have left us exclaiming, "Soy much drama!"
The revelation of this correlation has sparked a fair amount of curiosity and skepticism. Some may wonder if these soybeans are secretly whispering "i can't even" to their neighboring crops, while others may question if the exasperated internet users are inadvertently affecting the molecular structure of these soybeans. It's a tangled web of agricultural and emotional expression, tantamount to a dad joke that just can't be ignored.
Unraveling the mystery behind this correlation sheds light on the broader implications of agricultural practices on human behavior. It reminds us that the tangential effects of technological advancements can be as surprising as finding a soybean in a cornfield – which in our case, was not a result of cross-pollination, but rather a peculiar correlation.
In this paper, we aim to not only present the statistical evidence of this intriguing connection but also to indulge in a lighthearted exploration of its implications. As we navigate through the labyrinth of GMO soybeans and internet exasperation, we hope to unearth insights that are not only scientifically valuable but also surprisingly entertaining.
So, let's embark on this journey with a soyful of curiosity and a willingness to embrace the humor that comes with exploring the unexpected intersections of agriculture and human emotions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The peculiar correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even' has piqued the interest of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In "Soybeans & Emotions Quarterly," Smith et al. examine the intersection of agricultural practices and emotional expressions, noting a surprising positive correlation between the two variables. This finding raises a soy-rious question – are genetically modified soybeans secretly becoming the soyful source of exasperation for internet users in Illinois?

In "GMOs and You: A Guide to Crop Modifications," Doe et al. delve into the intricacies of GMO soybean cultivation and its potential impact on human emotions. Their research sheds light on the soyful possibility that these soybeans may be engaging in some "emo-tional" communication, leading to an uptick in 'i can't even' searches on Google. It's as if these soybeans are whispering, "Soy sorry to hear that you can't even," to the exasperated internet users in Illinois.

Jones et al., in "The Emotional Harvest: Exploring the Intersection of Agriculture and Internet Culture," take a unique approach to unraveling the mystery behind the GMO soybean-Google 'i can't even' correlation. Their research suggests that the emotional resonance of soybean cultivation extends beyond the fields, permeating the digital landscape with 'i can't even' sentiments. This finding adds a soyful twist to the age-old question of "What came first, the soybean or the sigh?"

As we venture into the more whimsical side of literature, "The Secret Life of Soybeans" by Jane Soyre and "GMO: A Love Story" by John Grisham (not that John Grisham, the other one) shed a light-hearted perspective on the emotional undercurrents of soybean cultivation and their potential influence on internet expressions of exasperation. These fictional works add a soyful touch of humor to our exploration of the GMO soybean-Google 'i can't even' conundrum.

Furthermore, our investigation extends to the realm of social media, where user posts such as "Just saw some GMO soybeans and I can't even" and "Feeling like a GMO soybean in a world of 'i can't even'" provide anecdotal evidence of the emotional resonance associated with GMO soybeans. These social media posts offer a soy-dose of humor and serve as a quirky reminder that the soybean saga is more than just a statistical quirk – it's a soyful source of entertainment.

In conclusion, the literature surrounding the GMO soybean-Google 'i can't even' connection presents a delightful blend of soy-serious research and soyful anecdotes. It's as if the soybeans themselves are crafting a dad joke of their own, one that leaves us chuckling and scratching our heads simultaneously. As we navigate the soybean labyrinth, let's not forget to pepper our research with a soyful dose of humor and curiosity – after all, who knows what other soy-prises we may unearth along the way!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. By diving into the data from the USDA and Google Trends, we aim to shed light on this peculiar but captivating relationship. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022, highlighting the robustness of the connection.

In a soybean field, one can only hope the soybeans are 'growing' the way they're supposed to. On the other hand, it's remarkable how the emotional upheavals corresponding to 'i can't even' seem to be intertwined with the cultivation of these soybeans. The positive correlation between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches suggests that there may be a latent link between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation. It's as if the soybeans are quietly influencing the emotional state of the populace, or perhaps it's the other way around!

Our results underscore the need for further investigation and lend credence to the idea that agricultural and technological developments have unforeseen implications on human behavior. As we delve deeper into this peculiar and unexpected connection, we may stumble upon insights that are both scientifically valuable and remarkably amusing. For now, let's just say that the next time you encounter GMO soybeans in Illinois, take a moment to ponder the hidden emotional rollercoaster they may be setting in motion.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we delve into the captivating world of agricultural and technological correlations, we stumbled upon a peculiar and unexpected connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even' in Illinois. It's as if these soybeans are cultivating not just crops, but also a bizarre emotional landscape. With a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings have left us exclaiming, "Soy much drama!"
The revelation of this correlation has sparked a fair amount of curiosity and skepticism. Some may wonder if these soybeans are secretly whispering "i can't even" to their neighboring crops, while others may question if the exasperated internet users are inadvertently affecting the molecular structure of these soybeans. It's a tangled web of agricultural and emotional expression, tantamount to a dad joke that just can't be ignored.
Unraveling the mystery behind this correlation sheds light on the broader implications of agricultural practices on human behavior. It reminds us that the tangential effects of technological advancements can be as surprising as finding a soybean in a cornfield – which in our case, was not a result of cross-pollination, but rather a peculiar correlation.
In this paper, we aim to not only present the statistical evidence of this intriguing connection but also to indulge in a lighthearted exploration of its implications. As we navigate through the labyrinth of GMO soybeans and internet exasperation, we hope to unearth insights that are not only scientifically valuable but also surprisingly entertaining.
So, let's embark on this journey with a soyful of curiosity and a willingness to embrace the humor that comes with exploring the unexpected intersections of agriculture and human emotions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even', our research team embarked on a data-driven adventure that involved harvesting information from the expansive fields of the internet. Primarily, data was sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to capture the intricate details of GMO soybean cultivation in Illinois. Additionally, Google Trends served as our digital compass, guiding us through the peaks and valleys of 'i can't even' searches from 2004 to 2022.

In the spirit of thoroughness, our methodology was as delightfully convoluted as navigating a corn maze blindfolded. First, we meticulously compiled annual data on the hectares of GMO soybeans planted in Illinois, taking care not to sow any seeds of doubt about the precision of our figures. Then, with the dexterity of a seasoned digital farmer, we harvested weekly Google search data for the phrase 'i can't even', ensuring that no fleeting exclamation of exasperation escaped our scrutiny.

Akin to probing for hidden treasure in a haystack, our statistical analysis employed robust methods to disentangle the complexities of the data. We conducted a time-series analysis to capture the evolving patterns of GMO soybean cultivation and the ebb and flow of 'i can't even' searches over the years. Furthermore, we harnessed the power of correlation analysis to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

With the precision of a seasoned soybean harvester, we calculated the correlation coefficient and p-value, unleashing the statistical machinery to delineate the interplay between GMO soybeans and digital expressions of exasperation. As we traversed the fertile landscape of data, we navigated through the statistical thickets with an eye for detail, ensuring that no subtle nuances were overlooked in our quest for insight.

In the spirit of maintaining a sense of levity amidst the seriousness of scientific inquiry, we approached our methodology with the same humor that accompanies a day at the farm. After all, why cry over spilt soy milk when you can chuckle at the unexpected connections between agriculture and internet culture?

In summary, our methodology encapsulated the ardent pursuit of uncovering the unexpected, entwining meticulous data collection and sophisticated statistical analysis with a sprinkle of good-natured humor – because in the world of research, a well-timed dad joke is as valuable as a bountiful harvest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8959588, r-squared of 0.8027421, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. By diving into the data from the USDA and Google Trends, we aim to shed light on this peculiar but captivating relationship. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022, highlighting the robustness of the connection.

In a soybean field, one can only hope the soybeans are 'growing' the way they're supposed to. On the other hand, it's remarkable how the emotional upheavals corresponding to 'i can't even' seem to be intertwined with the cultivation of these soybeans. The positive correlation between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches suggests that there may be a latent link between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation. It's as if the soybeans are quietly influencing the emotional state of the populace, or perhaps it's the other way around!

Our results underscore the need for further investigation and lend credence to the idea that agricultural and technological developments have unforeseen implications on human behavior. As we delve deeper into this peculiar and unexpected connection, we may stumble upon insights that are both scientifically valuable and remarkably amusing. For now, let's just say that the next time you encounter GMO soybeans in Illinois, take a moment to ponder the hidden emotional rollercoaster they may be setting in motion.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we delve into the captivating world of agricultural and technological correlations, we stumbled upon a peculiar and unexpected connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even' in Illinois. It's as if these soybeans are cultivating not just crops, but also a bizarre emotional landscape. With a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings have left us exclaiming, "Soy much drama!"
The revelation of this correlation has sparked a fair amount of curiosity and skepticism. Some may wonder if these soybeans are secretly whispering "i can't even" to their neighboring crops, while others may question if the exasperated internet users are inadvertently affecting the molecular structure of these soybeans. It's a tangled web of agricultural and emotional expression, tantamount to a dad joke that just can't be ignored.
Unraveling the mystery behind this correlation sheds light on the broader implications of agricultural practices on human behavior. It reminds us that the tangential effects of technological advancements can be as surprising as finding a soybean in a cornfield – which in our case, was not a result of cross-pollination, but rather a peculiar correlation.
In this paper, we aim to not only present the statistical evidence of this intriguing connection but also to indulge in a lighthearted exploration of its implications. As we navigate through the labyrinth of GMO soybeans and internet exasperation, we hope to unearth insights that are not only scientifically valuable but also surprisingly entertaining.
So, let's embark on this journey with a soyful of curiosity and a willingness to embrace the humor that comes with exploring the unexpected intersections of agriculture and human emotions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data revealed a statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. From 2004 to 2022, our research team found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with an r-squared value of 0.8027421, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation suggests that there is more to soybeans than meets the eye, or should we say, the soy?

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling relationship between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches. The plot clearly showcases the upward trend that highlights the synchronous movement of these two variables over time. It's almost as if the soybeans are whispering 'i can't even' to the internet users, or perhaps they're just incredibly relatable to the point of distress!

This unexpected connection between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation has left us feeling soy torn - torn between fascination and amusement. It's like finding a soybean in a field of corn; unexpected, but undeniably captivating.

This correlation not only underscores the need for further investigation but also raises thought-provoking questions about the interplay between technological advancements and human behavior. As we continue to peel back the layers of this peculiar link, we may stumble upon insights that are not only scientifically valuable but also remarkably entertaining.

In the words of a soybean to a curious researcher, "Soy glad you found me interesting! Let's dig deeper and uncover the soyful mysteries of this agricultural and emotional enigma."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. By diving into the data from the USDA and Google Trends, we aim to shed light on this peculiar but captivating relationship. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022, highlighting the robustness of the connection.

In a soybean field, one can only hope the soybeans are 'growing' the way they're supposed to. On the other hand, it's remarkable how the emotional upheavals corresponding to 'i can't even' seem to be intertwined with the cultivation of these soybeans. The positive correlation between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches suggests that there may be a latent link between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation. It's as if the soybeans are quietly influencing the emotional state of the populace, or perhaps it's the other way around!

Our results underscore the need for further investigation and lend credence to the idea that agricultural and technological developments have unforeseen implications on human behavior. As we delve deeper into this peculiar and unexpected connection, we may stumble upon insights that are both scientifically valuable and remarkably amusing. For now, let's just say that the next time you encounter GMO soybeans in Illinois, take a moment to ponder the hidden emotional rollercoaster they may be setting in motion.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The peculiar correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even' has piqued the interest of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In "Soybeans & Emotions Quarterly," Smith et al. examine the intersection of agricultural practices and emotional expressions, noting a surprising positive correlation between the two variables. This finding raises a soy-rious question – are genetically modified soybeans secretly becoming the soyful source of exasperation for internet users in Illinois?
In "GMOs and You: A Guide to Crop Modifications," Doe et al. delve into the intricacies of GMO soybean cultivation and its potential impact on human emotions. Their research sheds light on the soyful possibility that these soybeans may be engaging in some "emo-tional" communication, leading to an uptick in 'i can't even' searches on Google. It's as if these soybeans are whispering, "Soy sorry to hear that you can't even," to the exasperated internet users in Illinois.
Jones et al., in "The Emotional Harvest: Exploring the Intersection of Agriculture and Internet Culture," take a unique approach to unraveling the mystery behind the GMO soybean-Google 'i can't even' correlation. Their research suggests that the emotional resonance of soybean cultivation extends beyond the fields, permeating the digital landscape with 'i can't even' sentiments. This finding adds a soyful twist to the age-old question of "What came first, the soybean or the sigh?"
As we venture into the more whimsical side of literature, "The Secret Life of Soybeans" by Jane Soyre and "GMO: A Love Story" by John Grisham (not that John Grisham, the other one) shed a light-hearted perspective on the emotional undercurrents of soybean cultivation and their potential influence on internet expressions of exasperation. These fictional works add a soyful touch of humor to our exploration of the GMO soybean-Google 'i can't even' conundrum.
Furthermore, our investigation extends to the realm of social media, where user posts such as "Just saw some GMO soybeans and I can't even" and "Feeling like a GMO soybean in a world of 'i can't even'" provide anecdotal evidence of the emotional resonance associated with GMO soybeans. These social media posts offer a soy-dose of humor and serve as a quirky reminder that the soybean saga is more than just a statistical quirk – it's a soyful source of entertainment.
In conclusion, the literature surrounding the GMO soybean-Google 'i can't even' connection presents a delightful blend of soy-serious research and soyful anecdotes. It's as if the soybeans themselves are crafting a dad joke of their own, one that leaves us chuckling and scratching our heads simultaneously. As we navigate the soybean labyrinth, let's not forget to pepper our research with a soyful dose of humor and curiosity – after all, who knows what other soy-prises we may unearth along the way!


[[RESULTS]]
The data revealed a statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. From 2004 to 2022, our research team found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with an r-squared value of 0.8027421, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation suggests that there is more to soybeans than meets the eye, or should we say, the soy?
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling relationship between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches. The plot clearly showcases the upward trend that highlights the synchronous movement of these two variables over time. It's almost as if the soybeans are whispering 'i can't even' to the internet users, or perhaps they're just incredibly relatable to the point of distress!
This unexpected connection between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation has left us feeling soy torn - torn between fascination and amusement. It's like finding a soybean in a field of corn; unexpected, but undeniably captivating.
This correlation not only underscores the need for further investigation but also raises thought-provoking questions about the interplay between technological advancements and human behavior. As we continue to peel back the layers of this peculiar link, we may stumble upon insights that are not only scientifically valuable but also remarkably entertaining.
In the words of a soybean to a curious researcher, "Soy glad you found me interesting! Let's dig deeper and uncover the soyful mysteries of this agricultural and emotional enigma."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The remarkable correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even' has certainly piqued the curiosity of researchers and casual observers alike. Our findings not only support but magnify the significance of the whimsical observations made in the literature review. It's as if the soybeans and internet users in Illinois are engaged in a silent dialogue, punctuated by 'i can't even' sentiments, leaving us to ponder the emotional resonance of agricultural practices.

In line with Smith et al.'s "Soybeans & Emotions Quarterly," our research emphasizes the soyful potential of genetically modified soybeans to influence the emotional fabric of internet users. It's almost as if the soybeans are saying, "I soy your frustration, and I raise you an 'i can't even'." Perhaps these soybeans are serving as honorary members of the internet's emotional support group, silently commiserating with the exasperated individuals behind the screen.

Moreover, our results reaffirm the soyful possibility elucidated by Doe et al. in "GMOs and You: A Guide to Crop Modifications." The idea that GMO soybean cultivation may be giving rise to an "emo-tional" communication with internet users seems less soy-rious and more soy-stematically plausible now. It's as if the soybeans have become adept at understanding and responding to human emotions, albeit silently through statistical trends and Google searches.

From a lighthearted perspective, our findings echo the sentiment expressed by the fictitious works "The Secret Life of Soybeans" by Jane Soyre and "GMO: A Love Story" by the other John Grisham. The soyful dance of statistical significance between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches seems like a punchline waiting to be delivered, leaving us both bemused and intrigued. The soybean saga, it seems, continues to offer a delightful blend of scientific inquiry and unexpected amusement.

In summary, our research has peeled back the layers of this intriguing correlation, shedding light on the hidden emotional resonance of GMO soybean cultivation in Illinois. It compels us to engage in further exploration, not only from a scientific standpoint but also from the perspective of agricultural and emotional storytelling. As we press on, let's remember to approach this soybean saga with a soyful dose of humor and open-minded curiosity – who knows what other soy-prises may await us in the realm of agricultural and emotional whimsy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i cant even'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. By diving into the data from the USDA and Google Trends, we aim to shed light on this peculiar but captivating relationship. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022, highlighting the robustness of the connection.

In a soybean field, one can only hope the soybeans are 'growing' the way they're supposed to. On the other hand, it's remarkable how the emotional upheavals corresponding to 'i can't even' seem to be intertwined with the cultivation of these soybeans. The positive correlation between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches suggests that there may be a latent link between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation. It's as if the soybeans are quietly influencing the emotional state of the populace, or perhaps it's the other way around!

Our results underscore the need for further investigation and lend credence to the idea that agricultural and technological developments have unforeseen implications on human behavior. As we delve deeper into this peculiar and unexpected connection, we may stumble upon insights that are both scientifically valuable and remarkably amusing. For now, let's just say that the next time you encounter GMO soybeans in Illinois, take a moment to ponder the hidden emotional rollercoaster they may be setting in motion.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we delve into the captivating world of agricultural and technological correlations, we stumbled upon a peculiar and unexpected connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even' in Illinois. It's as if these soybeans are cultivating not just crops, but also a bizarre emotional landscape. With a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings have left us exclaiming, "Soy much drama!"
The revelation of this correlation has sparked a fair amount of curiosity and skepticism. Some may wonder if these soybeans are secretly whispering "i can't even" to their neighboring crops, while others may question if the exasperated internet users are inadvertently affecting the molecular structure of these soybeans. It's a tangled web of agricultural and emotional expression, tantamount to a dad joke that just can't be ignored.
Unraveling the mystery behind this correlation sheds light on the broader implications of agricultural practices on human behavior. It reminds us that the tangential effects of technological advancements can be as surprising as finding a soybean in a cornfield – which in our case, was not a result of cross-pollination, but rather a peculiar correlation.
In this paper, we aim to not only present the statistical evidence of this intriguing connection but also to indulge in a lighthearted exploration of its implications. As we navigate through the labyrinth of GMO soybeans and internet exasperation, we hope to unearth insights that are not only scientifically valuable but also surprisingly entertaining.
So, let's embark on this journey with a soyful of curiosity and a willingness to embrace the humor that comes with exploring the unexpected intersections of agriculture and human emotions.

[[RESULTS]]
The data revealed a statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. From 2004 to 2022, our research team found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8959588, with an r-squared value of 0.8027421, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation suggests that there is more to soybeans than meets the eye, or should we say, the soy?
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the compelling relationship between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches. The plot clearly showcases the upward trend that highlights the synchronous movement of these two variables over time. It's almost as if the soybeans are whispering 'i can't even' to the internet users, or perhaps they're just incredibly relatable to the point of distress!
This unexpected connection between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation has left us feeling soy torn - torn between fascination and amusement. It's like finding a soybean in a field of corn; unexpected, but undeniably captivating.
This correlation not only underscores the need for further investigation but also raises thought-provoking questions about the interplay between technological advancements and human behavior. As we continue to peel back the layers of this peculiar link, we may stumble upon insights that are not only scientifically valuable but also remarkably entertaining.
In the words of a soybean to a curious researcher, "Soy glad you found me interesting! Let's dig deeper and uncover the soyful mysteries of this agricultural and emotional enigma."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between GMO soybeans in Illinois and Google searches for 'i can’t even' has highlighted a robust and statistically significant relationship. It's as if the soybeans are seeding a whole new field of emotional drama – they're not just growing crops, they're growing feelings! It seems there may be more to these soybeans than just their edamame potential – they're quite the drama queens of the agricultural world!

Our findings have left us with a soyful of questions and some serious food for thought. It's like the soybeans are saying, "I can't even" to the researchers, and the researchers are responding with, "Oh, soy can." The synchronicity of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena is as surprising as finding a soybean in a field of kale – unexpected, but undeniably captivating.

As we wrap up this investigation, it's clear that more research in this area would just be soy unnecessary. We've squeezed all the juice out of this soybean, and it's time to embrace the lightheartedness of this unexpected correlation. It's as if the soybeans are giving us a nudge and whispering, "Soy long and thanks for all the laughs!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Innovation and Research Studies (CAIRS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Soy Much Drama: Exploring the GMO-Soybean-Google 'I Can't Even' Connection in Illinois with an abstract of This research paper examines the intriguing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in soybeans in Illinois and the frequency of Google searches for 'i can't even'. By diving into the data from the USDA and Google Trends, we aim to shed light on this peculiar but captivating relationship. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8959588 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022, highlighting the robustness of the connection.
In a soybean field, one can only hope the soybeans are 'growing' the way they're supposed to. On the other hand, it's remarkable how the emotional upheavals corresponding to 'i can't even' seem to be intertwined with the cultivation of these soybeans. The positive correlation between GMO soybean use and 'i can't even' searches suggests that there may be a latent link between agricultural practices and internet expressions of exasperation. It's as if the soybeans are quietly influencing the emotional state of the populace, or perhaps it's the other way around!
Our results underscore the need for further investigation and lend credence to the idea that agricultural and technological developments have unforeseen implications on human behavior. As we delve deeper into this peculiar and unexpected connection, we may stumble upon insights that are both scientifically valuable and remarkably amusing. For now, let's just say that the next time you encounter GMO soybeans in Illinois, take a moment to ponder the hidden emotional rollercoaster they may be setting in motion.

ChatGPT:

GMO soybeans, Illinois, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, USDA data, genetic modification, soybean cultivation, emotional upheavals, agricultural practices, internet expressions, exasperation, technological developments, human behavior, unforeseen implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Illinois
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Illinois that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Illinois

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.8959588 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8027421 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Illinois) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.1E-7. 0.0000002139800901002208300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 2.1E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,673,332 random variables You don't actually need 4 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in soybeans in Illinois (GMO soybeans %)81818788879089929092919394939394949495
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([81,81,87,88,87,90,89,92,90,92,91,93,94,93,93,94,94,94,95,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Illinois"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1855 · Black Variable ID: 814 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0