about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,853 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and the second variable is Arson in Indiana.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Farmers were spending less time arguing with their corn about its genetic choices, freeing up more time to keep an eye on their fields and prevent any shifty-looking individuals from starting fires. Remember, a cob with a conscience is a cornfield without chaos! And that's a-maize-ing for fire prevention in Indiana.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic scene in a cornfield located in Indiana. The corn plants stand tall, swaying in the gentle breeze, with some of them visibly labeled as GMOs. In the distance, a billow of smoke rises from a building that has been set on fire, indicating arson. The overall ambiance should evoke a sense of sci-fi fantasy, with a mysterious and otherworldly atmosphere enshrouding the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Glitch art Parallax art Psychedelic Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Indiana, corn plants sway gently in the breeze. Some of the corn plants have labels indicating that they are GMOs. In the distance, a billow of smoke rises from a building that has been set on fire, indicating arson.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Indiana, corn plants sway gently in the breeze. Some of the corn plants have labels indicating that they are GMOs. In the distance, a billow of smoke rises from a building that has been set on fire, indicating arson. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic scene in a cornfield located in Indiana. The corn plants stand tall, swaying in the gentle breeze, with some of them visibly labeled as GMOs. In the distance, a billow of smoke rises from a building that has been set on fire, indicating arson. The overall ambiance should evoke a sense of sci-fi fantasy, with a mysterious and otherworldly atmosphere enshrouding the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Indiana caused Arson in Indiana to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana

The Journal of Agronomic Arsonology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the agricultural sector of Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, an analysis was conducted for the years 2000 to 2022. The study revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. The implications of these findings, along with potential causal mechanisms and policy recommendations, are discussed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the agricultural sector of Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, an analysis was conducted for the years 2000 to 2022. The study revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. The implications of these findings, along with potential causal mechanisms and policy recommendations, are discussed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, have long been a subject of debate and controversy within the agricultural community. While proponents tout their potential to enhance crop productivity, increase resistance to pests, and reduce reliance on harmful pesticides, skeptics raise concerns about their potential environmental and health impacts. Amidst these debates, an unexpected and rather "heated" connection has emerged – the potential correlation between the use of GMO corn and incidents of arson in the state of Indiana.

This study delves into this "hot" topic, aiming to shed light on the intriguing possibility of a link between GMO corn and arson in Indiana. While some may dismiss this as a mere "cornspiracy theory," the statistical analyses conducted in this study reveal a surprising degree of association, implicating GMO corn in a different kind of "firestorm."

The use of USDA and FBI data constitutes the "seedy" foundation of this investigation, allowing for a rigorous examination of the relationship between GMO corn and arson within the Hoosier State. Through the lens of statistics and empirical analysis, we aim to discern whether the "ears" of GMO corn are, in fact, "fueling" the incidence of arson, or if this alleged connection is nothing but a "kernel of truth" buried in a sea of statistical noise.

As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to "stalk" alongside us through the "fields" of GMO research and arson statistics, as we attempt to unravel the hidden, "cereal" link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. In doing so, we hope to ignite a thoughtful discussion and perhaps even spark new avenues of inquiry in both agricultural and criminological research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the agricultural sector of Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, an analysis was conducted for the years 2000 to 2022. The study revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. The implications of these findings, along with potential causal mechanisms and policy recommendations, are discussed.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, have long been a subject of debate and controversy within the agricultural community. While proponents tout their potential to enhance crop productivity, increase resistance to pests, and reduce reliance on harmful pesticides, skeptics raise concerns about their potential environmental and health impacts. Amidst these debates, an unexpected and rather "heated" connection has emerged – the potential correlation between the use of GMO corn and incidents of arson in the state of Indiana.
This study delves into this "hot" topic, aiming to shed light on the intriguing possibility of a link between GMO corn and arson in Indiana. While some may dismiss this as a mere "cornspiracy theory," the statistical analyses conducted in this study reveal a surprising degree of association, implicating GMO corn in a different kind of "firestorm."
The use of USDA and FBI data constitutes the "seedy" foundation of this investigation, allowing for a rigorous examination of the relationship between GMO corn and arson within the Hoosier State. Through the lens of statistics and empirical analysis, we aim to discern whether the "ears" of GMO corn are, in fact, "fueling" the incidence of arson, or if this alleged connection is nothing but a "kernel of truth" buried in a sea of statistical noise.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to "stalk" alongside us through the "fields" of GMO research and arson statistics, as we attempt to unravel the hidden, "cereal" link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. In doing so, we hope to ignite a thoughtful discussion and perhaps even spark new avenues of inquiry in both agricultural and criminological research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The potential link between the use of GMO corn and incidents of arson in Indiana has garnered significant attention in recent years, prompting a thorough review of existing literature to ascertain the extent of prior research on this rather unusual association.

Smith and Doe (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO adoption patterns in corn production across several Midwestern states, including Indiana. While their study primarily focused on yield and economic outcomes, it inadvertently touched upon the environmental and sociological implications of GMO usage, providing a preliminary foundation for subsequent investigations into the potential collateral effects of GMO corn cultivation.

In "The Effects of Genetically Modified Crops on Agriculture" (Jones, 2018), the author delves into the broader impact of GMOs on agricultural practices and outcomes, shedding light on the intricate web of interactions between genetically modified corn and various aspects of agricultural production and management. Although the primary focus of this work is not specifically on arson, it lays the groundwork for understanding the multifaceted effects of GMO corn cultivation within the broader agricultural landscape.

Moving beyond academic literature, "GMOs Unraveled: Science, Myths, and Misconceptions" (Brown, 2020) provides an in-depth exploration of public perceptions and controversies surrounding genetically modified organisms. While the book does not explicitly address the intersection of GMO corn with criminal activities, it offers valuable insights into the broader societal discourse around GMOs, which may have implications for the public perception of GMO corn and its potential association with arson incidents.

In contrast, the fictional works "GMO of Thrones" (Martin, 2011) and "The Corn Ultimatum" (Ludlum, 2007) present dramatic narratives that, while purely speculative, offer imaginative scenarios where GMO corn plays a central role in conspiracies and clandestine activities. Though these literary works are not grounded in empirical research, they reflect the popular imagination surrounding GMO-related phenomena and may subtly influence public attitudes towards GMO corn and its potential involvement in criminal activities.

Social media discussions, such as the post by @CornOnTheCobb123 on Twitter, have also contributed to the ongoing discourse surrounding GMO corn and its hypothetical connection to arson in Indiana. While anecdotal in nature, these informal exchanges may reflect underlying public sentiments and speculative conjectures that permeate popular culture, potentially influencing perceptions of GMO corn and its perceived ramifications.

In sum, the existing literature, encompassing academic research, non-fiction publications, fiction novels, and online discussions, presents a diverse array of perspectives and insights related to GMO corn and its potential association with arson in Indiana. While the serious scientific investigations offer valuable contributions, the broader cultural and societal discourse surrounding this "corn-y" connection cannot be overlooked, as it shapes public perceptions and informs the context within which the potential relationship between GMO corn and arson unfolds.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the agricultural sector of Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, an analysis was conducted for the years 2000 to 2022. The study revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. The implications of these findings, along with potential causal mechanisms and policy recommendations, are discussed.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, have long been a subject of debate and controversy within the agricultural community. While proponents tout their potential to enhance crop productivity, increase resistance to pests, and reduce reliance on harmful pesticides, skeptics raise concerns about their potential environmental and health impacts. Amidst these debates, an unexpected and rather "heated" connection has emerged – the potential correlation between the use of GMO corn and incidents of arson in the state of Indiana.
This study delves into this "hot" topic, aiming to shed light on the intriguing possibility of a link between GMO corn and arson in Indiana. While some may dismiss this as a mere "cornspiracy theory," the statistical analyses conducted in this study reveal a surprising degree of association, implicating GMO corn in a different kind of "firestorm."
The use of USDA and FBI data constitutes the "seedy" foundation of this investigation, allowing for a rigorous examination of the relationship between GMO corn and arson within the Hoosier State. Through the lens of statistics and empirical analysis, we aim to discern whether the "ears" of GMO corn are, in fact, "fueling" the incidence of arson, or if this alleged connection is nothing but a "kernel of truth" buried in a sea of statistical noise.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to "stalk" alongside us through the "fields" of GMO research and arson statistics, as we attempt to unravel the hidden, "cereal" link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. In doing so, we hope to ignite a thoughtful discussion and perhaps even spark new avenues of inquiry in both agricultural and criminological research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection and Variables
The data utilized in this study were derived from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. The USDA provided comprehensive information on the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Indiana from 2000 to 2022, including data on acreage, yield, and the adoption of GMO varieties. Meanwhile, the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services supplied detailed records of arson incidents within the state during the same time period, encompassing the location, severity, and investigative outcomes of each incident.

To establish the connection between GMO corn and arson, several key variables were identified and analyzed. These included the annual acreage of GMO corn cultivation, the average yield per acre of GMO corn, as well as the frequency and severity of arson incidents. Additionally, control variables such as weather patterns, economic indicators, and demographic shifts were incorporated to mitigate potential confounding effects and enhance the robustness of the analysis.

Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis of the data commenced with determining the descriptive statistics for the variables of interest. Univariate and bivariate distributions were examined to identify potential trends and patterns within the dataset. Following this, a series of econometric models were constructed to assess the relationship between GMO corn use and arson in Indiana.

The primary model employed in this analysis was multiple regression, which allowed for the estimation of the impact of GMO corn cultivation on the incidence of arson while controlling for other relevant factors. To address potential endogeneity concerns, instrumental variable techniques were applied, utilizing exogenous variables such as annual precipitation, historical crime rates, and the prevalence of alternative agricultural practices as instruments for the endogenous GMO corn cultivation variable.

Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the findings under various model specifications and assumptions. Alternative functional forms, interaction terms, and heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors were considered to ensure the validity and reliability of the results.

Ethical Considerations
Throughout the course of this study, ethical considerations were paramount. Data privacy and confidentiality were strictly upheld, with all individual-level information anonymized and aggregated to prevent the identification of specific persons or properties. The research team also adhered to the principles of academic integrity and transparency, accurately reporting all results and disclosing any potential limitations or biases in the data and methodology.

Ultimately, the thorough and meticulous process of data collection, variable selection, statistical analysis, and ethical standards collectively formed the foundation of this investigation, enabling a rigorous examination of the purported connection between GMO corn and arson in Indiana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8763497, r-squared of 0.7679888, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the agricultural sector of Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, an analysis was conducted for the years 2000 to 2022. The study revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. The implications of these findings, along with potential causal mechanisms and policy recommendations, are discussed.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, have long been a subject of debate and controversy within the agricultural community. While proponents tout their potential to enhance crop productivity, increase resistance to pests, and reduce reliance on harmful pesticides, skeptics raise concerns about their potential environmental and health impacts. Amidst these debates, an unexpected and rather "heated" connection has emerged – the potential correlation between the use of GMO corn and incidents of arson in the state of Indiana.
This study delves into this "hot" topic, aiming to shed light on the intriguing possibility of a link between GMO corn and arson in Indiana. While some may dismiss this as a mere "cornspiracy theory," the statistical analyses conducted in this study reveal a surprising degree of association, implicating GMO corn in a different kind of "firestorm."
The use of USDA and FBI data constitutes the "seedy" foundation of this investigation, allowing for a rigorous examination of the relationship between GMO corn and arson within the Hoosier State. Through the lens of statistics and empirical analysis, we aim to discern whether the "ears" of GMO corn are, in fact, "fueling" the incidence of arson, or if this alleged connection is nothing but a "kernel of truth" buried in a sea of statistical noise.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to "stalk" alongside us through the "fields" of GMO research and arson statistics, as we attempt to unravel the hidden, "cereal" link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. In doing so, we hope to ignite a thoughtful discussion and perhaps even spark new avenues of inquiry in both agricultural and criminological research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data obtained for the years 2000 to 2022 revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497, indicating a strong positive relationship between the use of GMO corn in Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. This value is further substantiated by an r-squared of 0.7679888, reflecting the robustness of this association. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 denotes a statistically significant relationship, reaffirming the veracity of this unexpected connection.

The remarkable correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable trend between the two variables. It is interesting to note the juxtaposition of the seemingly disparate phenomena – the growth of GMO corn and the incidence of arson – and the striking alignment observed in our analysis. This convergence may prompt one to ponder whether GMO corn is indeed "fueling" these fiery incidents or if it is merely a "stalk" coincidence.

Our findings lend empirical support to the notion of a consequential association between GMO corn and arson in Indiana, challenging preconceived notions and stimulating further inquiry into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unanticipated correlation. The implications of this unexpected link, though perhaps corn-founding at first glance, offer fertile ground for future research and policy considerations in both agricultural and law enforcement domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the agricultural sector of Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, an analysis was conducted for the years 2000 to 2022. The study revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. The implications of these findings, along with potential causal mechanisms and policy recommendations, are discussed.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The potential link between the use of GMO corn and incidents of arson in Indiana has garnered significant attention in recent years, prompting a thorough review of existing literature to ascertain the extent of prior research on this rather unusual association.
Smith and Doe (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO adoption patterns in corn production across several Midwestern states, including Indiana. While their study primarily focused on yield and economic outcomes, it inadvertently touched upon the environmental and sociological implications of GMO usage, providing a preliminary foundation for subsequent investigations into the potential collateral effects of GMO corn cultivation.
In "The Effects of Genetically Modified Crops on Agriculture" (Jones, 2018), the author delves into the broader impact of GMOs on agricultural practices and outcomes, shedding light on the intricate web of interactions between genetically modified corn and various aspects of agricultural production and management. Although the primary focus of this work is not specifically on arson, it lays the groundwork for understanding the multifaceted effects of GMO corn cultivation within the broader agricultural landscape.
Moving beyond academic literature, "GMOs Unraveled: Science, Myths, and Misconceptions" (Brown, 2020) provides an in-depth exploration of public perceptions and controversies surrounding genetically modified organisms. While the book does not explicitly address the intersection of GMO corn with criminal activities, it offers valuable insights into the broader societal discourse around GMOs, which may have implications for the public perception of GMO corn and its potential association with arson incidents.
In contrast, the fictional works "GMO of Thrones" (Martin, 2011) and "The Corn Ultimatum" (Ludlum, 2007) present dramatic narratives that, while purely speculative, offer imaginative scenarios where GMO corn plays a central role in conspiracies and clandestine activities. Though these literary works are not grounded in empirical research, they reflect the popular imagination surrounding GMO-related phenomena and may subtly influence public attitudes towards GMO corn and its potential involvement in criminal activities.
Social media discussions, such as the post by @CornOnTheCobb123 on Twitter, have also contributed to the ongoing discourse surrounding GMO corn and its hypothetical connection to arson in Indiana. While anecdotal in nature, these informal exchanges may reflect underlying public sentiments and speculative conjectures that permeate popular culture, potentially influencing perceptions of GMO corn and its perceived ramifications.
In sum, the existing literature, encompassing academic research, non-fiction publications, fiction novels, and online discussions, presents a diverse array of perspectives and insights related to GMO corn and its potential association with arson in Indiana. While the serious scientific investigations offer valuable contributions, the broader cultural and societal discourse surrounding this "corn-y" connection cannot be overlooked, as it shapes public perceptions and informs the context within which the potential relationship between GMO corn and arson unfolds.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained for the years 2000 to 2022 revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497, indicating a strong positive relationship between the use of GMO corn in Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. This value is further substantiated by an r-squared of 0.7679888, reflecting the robustness of this association. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 denotes a statistically significant relationship, reaffirming the veracity of this unexpected connection.
The remarkable correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable trend between the two variables. It is interesting to note the juxtaposition of the seemingly disparate phenomena – the growth of GMO corn and the incidence of arson – and the striking alignment observed in our analysis. This convergence may prompt one to ponder whether GMO corn is indeed "fueling" these fiery incidents or if it is merely a "stalk" coincidence.
Our findings lend empirical support to the notion of a consequential association between GMO corn and arson in Indiana, challenging preconceived notions and stimulating further inquiry into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unanticipated correlation. The implications of this unexpected link, though perhaps corn-founding at first glance, offer fertile ground for future research and policy considerations in both agricultural and law enforcement domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The present study provides compelling evidence of a substantial correlation between the use of GMO corn in Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Our findings echo and extend prior research, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

The research of Smith and Doe (2015) inadvertently set the stage for our investigation, revealing the complex interplay of GMO corn cultivation with broader environmental and sociological factors. While their focus was not on arson specifically, their work indirectly emphasized the interconnectedness of agricultural practices with potential collateral effects, paving the way for our exploration.

Similarly, Jones (2018) laid the groundwork for understanding the multifaceted impact of GMOs on agricultural outcomes, inadvertently highlighting the intricate web of interactions that transcend conventional agricultural concerns. Our results corroborate and extend Jones's insights, suggesting that the consequences of GMO corn cultivation may extend beyond traditional agricultural domains, implicating unexpected and potentially inflammatory outcomes.

We also cannot discount the influence of popular culture and public discourse on the portrayal of GMO corn. While arguably less scholarly in nature, the fictional works of Martin (2011) and Ludlum (2007) artfully illuminated creative yet imaginative scenarios wherein GMO corn takes center stage in clandestine activities. While not grounded in empirical research, these narratives reflect and potentially influence broader societal perceptions, warranting consideration in the broader context of GMO-related phenomena.

Moreover, the anecdotal musings on social media platforms, as exemplified by @CornOnTheCobb123's Twitter post, cannot be dismissed outright. Despite their informal nature, they offer a glimpse into public sentiments and speculative conjectures, perhaps serving as a barometer for the broader cultural and societal discourse surrounding the potential connection between GMO corn and arson.

In light of our results, it is apparent that the "corn-y" connection between GMO corn and arson in Indiana is not merely a kernel of truth but represents a substantive association worthy of further investigation. The statistical robustness of our findings challenges conventional assumptions and galvanizes momentum for future research and policy considerations in both agricultural and law enforcement spheres.

The unexpected convergence of GMO corn and arson, while initially perplexing, underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the potential ramifications of GMO cultivation. As we delve deeper into the intricate tapestry of agricultural practices and their ripple effects, it behooves us to remain vigilant for unanticipated linkages, recognizing that the web of agricultural influence may extend far beyond the "stalk" reality.

In sum, while our findings may seem to be from the "corn-er" of unexpected correlations, they serve as a poignant reminder of the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate phenomena and the broader implications that transcend conventional disciplinary boundaries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Arson in Indiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the agricultural sector of Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, an analysis was conducted for the years 2000 to 2022. The study revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. The implications of these findings, along with potential causal mechanisms and policy recommendations, are discussed.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, have long been a subject of debate and controversy within the agricultural community. While proponents tout their potential to enhance crop productivity, increase resistance to pests, and reduce reliance on harmful pesticides, skeptics raise concerns about their potential environmental and health impacts. Amidst these debates, an unexpected and rather "heated" connection has emerged – the potential correlation between the use of GMO corn and incidents of arson in the state of Indiana.
This study delves into this "hot" topic, aiming to shed light on the intriguing possibility of a link between GMO corn and arson in Indiana. While some may dismiss this as a mere "cornspiracy theory," the statistical analyses conducted in this study reveal a surprising degree of association, implicating GMO corn in a different kind of "firestorm."
The use of USDA and FBI data constitutes the "seedy" foundation of this investigation, allowing for a rigorous examination of the relationship between GMO corn and arson within the Hoosier State. Through the lens of statistics and empirical analysis, we aim to discern whether the "ears" of GMO corn are, in fact, "fueling" the incidence of arson, or if this alleged connection is nothing but a "kernel of truth" buried in a sea of statistical noise.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we invite our readers to "stalk" alongside us through the "fields" of GMO research and arson statistics, as we attempt to unravel the hidden, "cereal" link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. In doing so, we hope to ignite a thoughtful discussion and perhaps even spark new avenues of inquiry in both agricultural and criminological research.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained for the years 2000 to 2022 revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497, indicating a strong positive relationship between the use of GMO corn in Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. This value is further substantiated by an r-squared of 0.7679888, reflecting the robustness of this association. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 denotes a statistically significant relationship, reaffirming the veracity of this unexpected connection.
The remarkable correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable trend between the two variables. It is interesting to note the juxtaposition of the seemingly disparate phenomena – the growth of GMO corn and the incidence of arson – and the striking alignment observed in our analysis. This convergence may prompt one to ponder whether GMO corn is indeed "fueling" these fiery incidents or if it is merely a "stalk" coincidence.
Our findings lend empirical support to the notion of a consequential association between GMO corn and arson in Indiana, challenging preconceived notions and stimulating further inquiry into the potential causal mechanisms underlying this unanticipated correlation. The implications of this unexpected link, though perhaps corn-founding at first glance, offer fertile ground for future research and policy considerations in both agricultural and law enforcement domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the results of this study provide compelling evidence of a significant correlation between the use of GMO corn in Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. This unexpected link sheds new light on the potential consequences of agricultural practices, suggesting that the cultivation of GMO corn may inadvertently fan the flames of fiery incidents. While this correlation may seem rather "corny" at first glance, the statistical rigor of our analysis underscores the seriousness of this "heated" connection.

The implications of these findings are far from trivial, as they challenge conventional thinking and call for a deeper examination of the impact of agricultural practices on societal phenomena. The "ear-resistible" nature of this association demands further scrutiny into the underlying causal mechanisms, inviting researchers to delve into the "kernels" of truth buried within the data.

Policy considerations stemming from this research are similarly thought-provoking, as they urge a reevaluation of agricultural regulations and law enforcement strategies in light of this unexpected correlation. The potential ripple effect of these findings extends beyond the boundaries of Indiana, prompting a reexamination of agricultural practices and their potential societal implications on a broader scale.

In light of these compelling results, it is with great confidence that we assert the culmination of this research: no further studies are needed in this area. The findings presented in this paper definitively illuminate the "fiery" relationship between GMO corn and arson in Indiana, leaving no seed of doubt about the pressing relevance of this research. It is time to cultivate new research furrows and set fire to fresh academic inquiries beyond this "corn-y" correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agronomic Arsonology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Anomalies Research and Exploration (SAARE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Corn-y Connection: Exploring the Correlation Between GMO Corn and Arson in Indiana with an abstract of This research paper investigates the potential link between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the agricultural sector of Indiana and incidents of arson within the state. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, an analysis was conducted for the years 2000 to 2022. The study revealed a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8763497 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a statistically significant relationship between the two variables. The implications of these findings, along with potential causal mechanisms and policy recommendations, are discussed.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, arson, Indiana, correlation, USDA data, FBI crime statistics, agricultural sector, genetically modified organism, causal mechanisms, policy recommendations

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Indiana
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Indiana that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Indiana

Arson in Indiana
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Indiana
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Indiana

Correlation r = 0.8763497 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7679888 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Indiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Indiana) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-8. 0.0000000421974208978450000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 4.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,698,131 random variables You don't actually need 23 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana (GMO corn %)767811111312777792242322321
Arson in Indiana (Arson rate)19.72021.22324.121.320.721.521.217.918.317.618.615.412.410.811.511.5910.512.3119.3




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7,6,7,8,11,11,13,12,7,7,7,7,9,2,2,4,2,3,2,2,3,2,1,])
array_2 = np.array([19.7,20,21.2,23,24.1,21.3,20.7,21.5,21.2,17.9,18.3,17.6,18.6,15.4,12.4,10.8,11.5,11.5,9,10.5,12.3,11,9.3,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Indiana"
array_2_name = "Arson in Indiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1853 · Black Variable ID: 711 · Red Variable ID: 20042
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0