about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,852 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the second variable is The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in GMO use led to a bumper crop of non-GMO corn, creating a maze-like effect in the fields. As the cornstalks grew taller and more perplexing, parking enforcement workers found themselves inadvertently wandering into the cornfields during their patrols and getting hopelessly lost. Faced with the bewildering prospect of ticketing lost vehicles within the corn labyrinth, many parking enforcement workers decided to seek less perplexing employment opportunities, ultimately leading to a decrease in their numbers statewide.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a steampunk-themed scene set in a vast cornfield in Ohio. Show rows of genetically modified corn stretching into the distance, with a team of parking enforcement workers navigating the field among the stalks. Their attire and equipment should reflect a steampunk aesthetic, with elaborate goggles, leather vests, and intricate mechanical devices in use. The workers should appear diligent and purposeful as they go about their monitoring tasks in this unique and visually stunning setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Futuristic Psychedelic Steampunk Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Steampunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield in Ohio, rows of genetically modified corn stretch into the distance. Among the stalks, a team of parking enforcement workers navigate the field, diligently monitoring the area.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Steampunk ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield in Ohio, rows of genetically modified corn stretch into the distance. Among the stalks, a team of parking enforcement workers navigate the field, diligently monitoring the area. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a steampunk-themed scene set in a vast cornfield in Ohio. Show rows of genetically modified corn stretching into the distance, with a team of parking enforcement workers navigating the field among the stalks. Their attire and equipment should reflect a steampunk aesthetic, with elaborate goggles, leather vests, and intricate mechanical devices in use. The workers should appear diligent and purposeful as they go about their monitoring tasks in this unique and visually stunning setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio caused The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio

Journal of Agricultural Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we peel back the layers of the seemingly disparate worlds of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state of Ohio. Using USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team embarked on a corny quest to unveil any potential kernel of truth in the connection between these two variables.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01, our findings suggest a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While the causal mechanism behind this link remains a-maize-ingly elusive, our research sheds light on this unexpected correlation and raises intriguing questions for future studies.

We invite readers to join us on this journey through the cornfields of statistical inquiry, as we navigate the stalky terrain of GMOs and uncover the cob-webbed mysteries of parking enforcement employment in Ohio.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we peel back the layers of the seemingly disparate worlds of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state of Ohio. Using USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team embarked on a corny quest to unveil any potential kernel of truth in the connection between these two variables.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01, our findings suggest a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While the causal mechanism behind this link remains a-maize-ingly elusive, our research sheds light on this unexpected correlation and raises intriguing questions for future studies.

We invite readers to join us on this journey through the cornfields of statistical inquiry, as we navigate the stalky terrain of GMOs and uncover the cob-webbed mysteries of parking enforcement employment in Ohio.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

What do genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and parking enforcement workers in Ohio have in common? At first glance, the two seem as unrelated as apples and oranges or, in this case, corn and traffic citations. Yet, as improbable as it may seem, our research has uncovered a fascinating link between these seemingly disparate variables.

It's no secret that GMOs have been the subject of much debate and controversy in the scientific community and beyond. On the other hand, parking enforcement may not exactly be everyone's favorite topic of conversation, unless you're a devoted fan of parking tickets and tow trucks. Nevertheless, our study delves into the curious overlap between these two subjects, aiming to shed some light on a correlation that may seem as unexpected as finding a crop circle in a parking lot.

With tongue firmly in cheek and a healthy dose of statistical vigor, our research team set out to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. We embarked on this investigation with a healthy skepticism, knowing that the road ahead might be paved with more corny puns and unexpected twists than a sprawling labyrinth of maize.

Join us on this unconventional journey as we navigate through the fields of statistical analysis and kernel-based inquiry to peel back the layers of this enigmatic correlation. And remember, when it comes to unexpected statistical relationships, sometimes you just have to "stalk" the data and "corn-er" the truth!

Now, let's crack on with the study, shall we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we peel back the layers of the seemingly disparate worlds of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state of Ohio. Using USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team embarked on a corny quest to unveil any potential kernel of truth in the connection between these two variables.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01, our findings suggest a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While the causal mechanism behind this link remains a-maize-ingly elusive, our research sheds light on this unexpected correlation and raises intriguing questions for future studies.

We invite readers to join us on this journey through the cornfields of statistical inquiry, as we navigate the stalky terrain of GMOs and uncover the cob-webbed mysteries of parking enforcement employment in Ohio.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
What do genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and parking enforcement workers in Ohio have in common? At first glance, the two seem as unrelated as apples and oranges or, in this case, corn and traffic citations. Yet, as improbable as it may seem, our research has uncovered a fascinating link between these seemingly disparate variables.
It's no secret that GMOs have been the subject of much debate and controversy in the scientific community and beyond. On the other hand, parking enforcement may not exactly be everyone's favorite topic of conversation, unless you're a devoted fan of parking tickets and tow trucks. Nevertheless, our study delves into the curious overlap between these two subjects, aiming to shed some light on a correlation that may seem as unexpected as finding a crop circle in a parking lot.
With tongue firmly in cheek and a healthy dose of statistical vigor, our research team set out to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. We embarked on this investigation with a healthy skepticism, knowing that the road ahead might be paved with more corny puns and unexpected twists than a sprawling labyrinth of maize.
Join us on this unconventional journey as we navigate through the fields of statistical analysis and kernel-based inquiry to peel back the layers of this enigmatic correlation. And remember, when it comes to unexpected statistical relationships, sometimes you just have to "stalk" the data and "corn-er" the truth!
Now, let's crack on with the study, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between GMO use in corn production and the labor market in Ohio has been a subject of academic inquiry for several decades. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of GMO adoption on corn yields, providing valuable insights into the agricultural implications of genetic modification. Moreover, Jones (2015) explored the socioeconomic consequences of GMO cultivation, revealing nuanced dynamics in labor market trends within the agricultural sector.

Moving away from the traditional scholarly literature, we turn to non-fiction works that have provided valuable context for our investigation. Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" has stimulated public discourse on the complexities of modern food production, offering a thought-provoking backdrop for our exploration of GMO corn. Additionally, Mann's "1491" sheds light on the historical and cultural dimensions of maize cultivation, enriching our understanding of this staple crop's significance in the Americas.

In the realm of fiction, Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" delivers a dystopian narrative that intertwines genetic engineering and societal structures, providing a speculative lens through which we can contemplate the implications of GMO innovation. Furthermore, Crichton's "Jurassic Park" offers a cautionary tale of genetic manipulation gone awry, drawing parallels to the potential ramifications of tampering with the genetic makeup of agricultural crops.

In the digital sphere, the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme humorously illustrates the allure of alternative pursuits over the mundane, mirroring the potential distractions that may influence labor force participation in parking enforcement. Meanwhile, the "This Is Fine" meme captures the essence of maintaining composure in the face of chaotic circumstances, reflecting the resilience exhibited by parking enforcement workers amidst the challenges of their profession.

These diverse sources not only illustrate the multidisciplinary nature of our inquiry but also highlight the broader cultural and societal implications of the intersection between GMO corn and labor dynamics in Ohio. As we delve into the empirical findings and theoretical frameworks underpinning this unconventional correlation, it is essential to recognize the eclectic tapestry of influences that have shaped our understanding of this enigmatic relationship.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we peel back the layers of the seemingly disparate worlds of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state of Ohio. Using USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team embarked on a corny quest to unveil any potential kernel of truth in the connection between these two variables.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01, our findings suggest a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While the causal mechanism behind this link remains a-maize-ingly elusive, our research sheds light on this unexpected correlation and raises intriguing questions for future studies.

We invite readers to join us on this journey through the cornfields of statistical inquiry, as we navigate the stalky terrain of GMOs and uncover the cob-webbed mysteries of parking enforcement employment in Ohio.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
What do genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and parking enforcement workers in Ohio have in common? At first glance, the two seem as unrelated as apples and oranges or, in this case, corn and traffic citations. Yet, as improbable as it may seem, our research has uncovered a fascinating link between these seemingly disparate variables.
It's no secret that GMOs have been the subject of much debate and controversy in the scientific community and beyond. On the other hand, parking enforcement may not exactly be everyone's favorite topic of conversation, unless you're a devoted fan of parking tickets and tow trucks. Nevertheless, our study delves into the curious overlap between these two subjects, aiming to shed some light on a correlation that may seem as unexpected as finding a crop circle in a parking lot.
With tongue firmly in cheek and a healthy dose of statistical vigor, our research team set out to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. We embarked on this investigation with a healthy skepticism, knowing that the road ahead might be paved with more corny puns and unexpected twists than a sprawling labyrinth of maize.
Join us on this unconventional journey as we navigate through the fields of statistical analysis and kernel-based inquiry to peel back the layers of this enigmatic correlation. And remember, when it comes to unexpected statistical relationships, sometimes you just have to "stalk" the data and "corn-er" the truth!
Now, let's crack on with the study, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research utilized a combination of rigorous statistical analysis and a healthy sense of humor to investigate the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. We collected data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning from 2003 to 2022, to construct a comprehensive dataset for our analysis.

To begin our investigation, we carefully curated information on GMO corn production in Ohio, considering factors such as acreage of GMO corn planted, type of genetically modified traits incorporated into the corn, and trends in GMO adoption over the years. We then harmonized this data with the number of parking enforcement workers employed in various municipalities across Ohio, accounting for variables such as urban versus rural areas, population density, and maize-induced merriment.

Next, we whipped out our statistical toolkit and applied an array of analytical methods to examine the relationship between GMO corn use and parking enforcement employment. Our initial models included linear regression, time series analysis, and an assortment of fancy statistical procedures that would make any cornstalk stand on end.

Once we had crunched the numbers and made enough corny jokes to fill a silo, we calculated descriptive statistics, correlation coefficients, and conducted hypothesis tests to evaluate the strength and significance of the observed relationship. Our analysis was as thorough as kernel inspection at a popcorn factory, ensuring that no grain of data went unnoticed.

To address potential confounding variables and ensure the robustness of our findings, we performed sensitivity analyses, control for variables such as crop production cycles, economic factors, and the whims of the weather. We also cross-validated our results using alternative statistical methods to corroborate the consistency of the observed association, leaving no stone, or kernel, unturned in our quest for statistical enlightenment.

In the spirit of scientific exploration, we also ventured into the realm of qualitative inquiry, engaging in interviews with agricultural experts, parking enforcement officers, and a few kernels of corn who had surprisingly strong opinions on the matter. While perhaps unconventional, these discussions provided valuable insights that complemented our quantitative findings, adding a dash of human perspective to our statistical stew.

In conclusion, our methodology was a careful blend of statistical prowess, whimsical curiosity, and an unyielding dedication to uncovering the mysteries of the maize. With the scientific method as our compass and a reliable sense of humor as our guide, we embarked on this research voyage, steering our statistical ship through the choppy waters of correlation and causation. As we now set sail into the sea of results, let the data be our North Star and the laughter our compass. Ahoy, and full speed ahead!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8197666, r-squared of 0.6720172, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we peel back the layers of the seemingly disparate worlds of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state of Ohio. Using USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team embarked on a corny quest to unveil any potential kernel of truth in the connection between these two variables.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01, our findings suggest a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While the causal mechanism behind this link remains a-maize-ingly elusive, our research sheds light on this unexpected correlation and raises intriguing questions for future studies.

We invite readers to join us on this journey through the cornfields of statistical inquiry, as we navigate the stalky terrain of GMOs and uncover the cob-webbed mysteries of parking enforcement employment in Ohio.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
What do genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and parking enforcement workers in Ohio have in common? At first glance, the two seem as unrelated as apples and oranges or, in this case, corn and traffic citations. Yet, as improbable as it may seem, our research has uncovered a fascinating link between these seemingly disparate variables.
It's no secret that GMOs have been the subject of much debate and controversy in the scientific community and beyond. On the other hand, parking enforcement may not exactly be everyone's favorite topic of conversation, unless you're a devoted fan of parking tickets and tow trucks. Nevertheless, our study delves into the curious overlap between these two subjects, aiming to shed some light on a correlation that may seem as unexpected as finding a crop circle in a parking lot.
With tongue firmly in cheek and a healthy dose of statistical vigor, our research team set out to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. We embarked on this investigation with a healthy skepticism, knowing that the road ahead might be paved with more corny puns and unexpected twists than a sprawling labyrinth of maize.
Join us on this unconventional journey as we navigate through the fields of statistical analysis and kernel-based inquiry to peel back the layers of this enigmatic correlation. And remember, when it comes to unexpected statistical relationships, sometimes you just have to "stalk" the data and "corn-er" the truth!
Now, let's crack on with the study, shall we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn production in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state revealed a surprising kernel of truth. Our analysis unveiled a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.6720172, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant connection.

From the sowing of the statistical seeds to the harvest of our findings, the data sprouted a compelling story of the intertwined fate of GMO corn and parking enforcement workers. Our figure (Fig. 1) visually depicts this correlation, demonstrating a trend as clear as sunshine on a field of maize.

As we reflect on these results, it is clear that the corn-nection between GMOs in Ohio and parking enforcement workers is not just a-maize-ing, but also fodder for further inquiry. While we cannot claim causation at this juncture, our study plants the seed for future research to unearth the underlying factors driving this improbable relationship.

In conclusion, our research stands as a testament to the unexpected links that can emerge from the fertile soil of statistical analysis. With the promise of more kernels of insight waiting to be cracked, we invite fellow researchers to join us in cultivating a deeper understanding of this curious connection. After all, when it comes to statistical investigations, sometimes the most fruitful discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of pairings!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we peel back the layers of the seemingly disparate worlds of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state of Ohio. Using USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team embarked on a corny quest to unveil any potential kernel of truth in the connection between these two variables.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01, our findings suggest a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While the causal mechanism behind this link remains a-maize-ingly elusive, our research sheds light on this unexpected correlation and raises intriguing questions for future studies.

We invite readers to join us on this journey through the cornfields of statistical inquiry, as we navigate the stalky terrain of GMOs and uncover the cob-webbed mysteries of parking enforcement employment in Ohio.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between GMO use in corn production and the labor market in Ohio has been a subject of academic inquiry for several decades. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the impact of GMO adoption on corn yields, providing valuable insights into the agricultural implications of genetic modification. Moreover, Jones (2015) explored the socioeconomic consequences of GMO cultivation, revealing nuanced dynamics in labor market trends within the agricultural sector.
Moving away from the traditional scholarly literature, we turn to non-fiction works that have provided valuable context for our investigation. Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" has stimulated public discourse on the complexities of modern food production, offering a thought-provoking backdrop for our exploration of GMO corn. Additionally, Mann's "1491" sheds light on the historical and cultural dimensions of maize cultivation, enriching our understanding of this staple crop's significance in the Americas.
In the realm of fiction, Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" delivers a dystopian narrative that intertwines genetic engineering and societal structures, providing a speculative lens through which we can contemplate the implications of GMO innovation. Furthermore, Crichton's "Jurassic Park" offers a cautionary tale of genetic manipulation gone awry, drawing parallels to the potential ramifications of tampering with the genetic makeup of agricultural crops.
In the digital sphere, the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme humorously illustrates the allure of alternative pursuits over the mundane, mirroring the potential distractions that may influence labor force participation in parking enforcement. Meanwhile, the "This Is Fine" meme captures the essence of maintaining composure in the face of chaotic circumstances, reflecting the resilience exhibited by parking enforcement workers amidst the challenges of their profession.
These diverse sources not only illustrate the multidisciplinary nature of our inquiry but also highlight the broader cultural and societal implications of the intersection between GMO corn and labor dynamics in Ohio. As we delve into the empirical findings and theoretical frameworks underpinning this unconventional correlation, it is essential to recognize the eclectic tapestry of influences that have shaped our understanding of this enigmatic relationship.


[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn production in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state revealed a surprising kernel of truth. Our analysis unveiled a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.6720172, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant connection.
From the sowing of the statistical seeds to the harvest of our findings, the data sprouted a compelling story of the intertwined fate of GMO corn and parking enforcement workers. Our figure (Fig. 1) visually depicts this correlation, demonstrating a trend as clear as sunshine on a field of maize.
As we reflect on these results, it is clear that the corn-nection between GMOs in Ohio and parking enforcement workers is not just a-maize-ing, but also fodder for further inquiry. While we cannot claim causation at this juncture, our study plants the seed for future research to unearth the underlying factors driving this improbable relationship.
In conclusion, our research stands as a testament to the unexpected links that can emerge from the fertile soil of statistical analysis. With the promise of more kernels of insight waiting to be cracked, we invite fellow researchers to join us in cultivating a deeper understanding of this curious connection. After all, when it comes to statistical investigations, sometimes the most fruitful discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of pairings!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have unearthed an intriguing correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While our initial foray into this unconventional investigation may have seemed like a wild stalk chase, the results have yielded a harvest of statistically significant insights.

Supporting the prior research by Smith et al. (2010) and Jones (2015) on the impact of GMO adoption and socioeconomic consequences, our study adds a kernels worth of evidence to the existing literature. The a-maize-ing correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 serves as a bushel of statistical validation for the notion that there is indeed more than meets the eye in the world of GMO corn and labor market dynamics in Ohio.

Returning to our non-traditional literature review, it turns out that Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and Mann's "1491" have not only provided contextual richness but have also helped us kernel the truth about the intricate relationship between GMOs and labor. Furthermore, Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" and Crichton's "Jurassic Park" have given us a speculative approach to understanding the potential ramifications of tinkering with genetic makeup, emphasizing the importance of considering the unintended consequences of agricultural innovation.

In the digital realm, the "Distracted Boyfriend" and "This Is Fine" memes have subtly hinted at the distractions and resilience exhibited by labor force participants, shining a light on the context within which our statistical analysis operates. This eclectic mix of sources has allowed us to glean a cornucopia of insights into the multifaceted nature of the corn-nection between GMOs and parking enforcement workers in Ohio.

Our results affirm that the correlation between these variables is as robust as a well-fertilized maize crop. While the causal mechanism behind this association remains as elusive as a missing kernel in a cob, it is clear that this unforeseen linkage warrants further investigation and poses a-maize-ing questions for future studies.

In growing our field of statistical inquiry, it is imperative to recognize that the surprises in our findings are as natural as the unpredictability of a field of genetically modified corn. Much like the unpredictability of a scientific experiment, the unexpected correlation we have unveiled underscores the importance of embracing the unexpected in research endeavors. This research has certainly stalked new ground, demonstrating that in the world of statistics, the most unlikely pairings can yield the most fruitful discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we peel back the layers of the seemingly disparate worlds of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state of Ohio. Using USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team embarked on a corny quest to unveil any potential kernel of truth in the connection between these two variables.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01, our findings suggest a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While the causal mechanism behind this link remains a-maize-ingly elusive, our research sheds light on this unexpected correlation and raises intriguing questions for future studies.

We invite readers to join us on this journey through the cornfields of statistical inquiry, as we navigate the stalky terrain of GMOs and uncover the cob-webbed mysteries of parking enforcement employment in Ohio.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
What do genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn and parking enforcement workers in Ohio have in common? At first glance, the two seem as unrelated as apples and oranges or, in this case, corn and traffic citations. Yet, as improbable as it may seem, our research has uncovered a fascinating link between these seemingly disparate variables.
It's no secret that GMOs have been the subject of much debate and controversy in the scientific community and beyond. On the other hand, parking enforcement may not exactly be everyone's favorite topic of conversation, unless you're a devoted fan of parking tickets and tow trucks. Nevertheless, our study delves into the curious overlap between these two subjects, aiming to shed some light on a correlation that may seem as unexpected as finding a crop circle in a parking lot.
With tongue firmly in cheek and a healthy dose of statistical vigor, our research team set out to investigate whether there exists a tangible relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. We embarked on this investigation with a healthy skepticism, knowing that the road ahead might be paved with more corny puns and unexpected twists than a sprawling labyrinth of maize.
Join us on this unconventional journey as we navigate through the fields of statistical analysis and kernel-based inquiry to peel back the layers of this enigmatic correlation. And remember, when it comes to unexpected statistical relationships, sometimes you just have to "stalk" the data and "corn-er" the truth!
Now, let's crack on with the study, shall we?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn production in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state revealed a surprising kernel of truth. Our analysis unveiled a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.6720172, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant connection.
From the sowing of the statistical seeds to the harvest of our findings, the data sprouted a compelling story of the intertwined fate of GMO corn and parking enforcement workers. Our figure (Fig. 1) visually depicts this correlation, demonstrating a trend as clear as sunshine on a field of maize.
As we reflect on these results, it is clear that the corn-nection between GMOs in Ohio and parking enforcement workers is not just a-maize-ing, but also fodder for further inquiry. While we cannot claim causation at this juncture, our study plants the seed for future research to unearth the underlying factors driving this improbable relationship.
In conclusion, our research stands as a testament to the unexpected links that can emerge from the fertile soil of statistical analysis. With the promise of more kernels of insight waiting to be cracked, we invite fellow researchers to join us in cultivating a deeper understanding of this curious connection. After all, when it comes to statistical investigations, sometimes the most fruitful discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of pairings!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we bring this research endeavor to a close, it's time to address the cob-elephant in the cornfield. The statistically significant correlation between GMO corn production in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state leaves us with kernels of wonder and cornfusion. Though we can't corn-firm causation, our findings suggest that perhaps there's more to GMOs than just corn on the cob - they may also have an a-maize-ing influence on the demand for parking enforcement personnel.

The a-maize-ing correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p-value less than 0.01 remind us that beneath the husk of statistical analysis, there may be unexpected kernels of truth waiting to be popped. While we may not have cracked the corn-undrum of causation in this study, the results certainly corn-firm the need for further research into this ear-resistible connection.

In the vast field of statistical inquiry, it's all too easy to become lost in the maze of variables and data, but our study demonstrates that sometimes the most corn-nected relationships emerge from the unlikeliest of pairings. Our figures (Fig. 1) paint a clear picture of this relationship, a picture as vivid as a field of sun-drenched cornstalks.

As we harvest the fruits of our labor, it's time to kick back and relish in the corn-pleting feeling of uncovering such an unexpected correlation. However, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It's time to "stalk" new statistical frontiers and "corn-er" different mysteries. After all, in the world of statistical inquiry, there are always more fields in need of exploration, and we must be ready to plow ahead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural and Urban Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kernel Connection: Unpacking the Relationship between GMO Corn and Parking Enforcement Workers in Ohio with an abstract of In this unconventional study, we peel back the layers of the seemingly disparate worlds of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state of Ohio. Using USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics data spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team embarked on a corny quest to unveil any potential kernel of truth in the connection between these two variables.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.8197666 and p < 0.01, our findings suggest a statistically significant relationship between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Ohio and the number of parking enforcement workers in the state. While the causal mechanism behind this link remains a-maize-ingly elusive, our research sheds light on this unexpected correlation and raises intriguing questions for future studies.
We invite readers to join us on this journey through the cornfields of statistical inquiry, as we navigate the stalky terrain of GMOs and uncover the cob-webbed mysteries of parking enforcement employment in Ohio.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, parking enforcement workers, Ohio, genetically modified organisms, corn production, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, causal mechanism, statistical inquiry, GMOs in Ohio, parking enforcement employment

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Ohio
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Ohio that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Ohio

The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of parking enforcement workers in Ohio
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio

Correlation r = 0.8197666 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6720172 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Ohio) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.71E-6. 0.0000097089452528475620000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.000971% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 102,998 random variables You don't actually need 102 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.59, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio (GMO corn %)6898912151324136332222351
The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio (Laborers)29027026015018020022034041035022013015016016015012012012070




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6,8,9,8,9,12,15,13,24,13,6,3,3,2,2,2,2,3,5,1,])
array_2 = np.array([290,270,260,150,180,200,220,340,410,350,220,130,150,160,160,150,120,120,120,70,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Ohio"
array_2_name = "The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 1852 · Black Variable ID: 719 · Red Variable ID: 12879
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0