about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,851 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in California and the second variable is xkcd comics published about history.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO cotton production in California grew, it led to an overabundance of historically themed xkcd comic ideas. The Boll Weevil, known for its devastation of cotton crops, inadvertently sparked a renaissance of punny historical xkcd comics.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Concept art]: Create an image of a cartoonist sitting on a stool amidst towering GMO cotton plants in a sunny California field. The cartoonist is drawing a comic strip on a large sketchpad, depicting historical figures working in a cotton field. The xkcd comic strip prominently features the historical figures and a label that reads "GMO Cotton in California." The surroundings should capture the vast expanse of the cotton field, with the cartoonist as the focal point of the scene. The style should reflect the playful and imaginative essence of xkcd comics. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Woodblock painting Magic realism Psychedelic Concept art
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A cartoonist in California is drawing a comic strip about the history of cotton while surrounded by towering GMO cotton plants. The xkcd comic features historical figures working in a cotton field, with a small label that reads "GMO Cotton in California" below.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: A cartoonist in California is drawing a comic strip about the history of cotton while surrounded by towering GMO cotton plants. The xkcd comic features historical figures working in a cotton field, with a small label that reads "GMO Cotton in California" below. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Concept art]: Create an image of a cartoonist sitting on a stool amidst towering GMO cotton plants in a sunny California field. The cartoonist is drawing a comic strip on a large sketchpad, depicting historical figures working in a cotton field. The xkcd comic strip prominently features the historical figures and a label that reads "GMO Cotton in California." The surroundings should capture the vast expanse of the cotton field, with the cartoonist as the focal point of the scene. The style should reflect the playful and imaginative essence of xkcd comics.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in California caused xkcd comics published about history to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene

The Journal of Genetic Giggle Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic linkage between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. Leveraging data from the USDA and employing advanced AI analysis on a curated collection of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this conundrum. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 with a statistically significant p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022.

Our rigorous investigation unveils a peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming and the content of xkcd comics focusing on historical narratives, leaving one to ponder whether it is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy. The idiosyncrasies of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the saying goes, "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta." In a similar vein, the unexpected connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events adds a dash of whimsical intrigue to the scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic linkage between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. Leveraging data from the USDA and employing advanced AI analysis on a curated collection of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this conundrum. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 with a statistically significant p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022.

Our rigorous investigation unveils a peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming and the content of xkcd comics focusing on historical narratives, leaving one to ponder whether it is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy. The idiosyncrasies of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the saying goes, "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta." In a similar vein, the unexpected connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events adds a dash of whimsical intrigue to the scholarly discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has become a prevalent practice, particularly in regions like California, where the climate is conducive to its growth. Simultaneously, the internet has witnessed an upsurge in the popularity of xkcd comics, a webcomic created by Randall Munroe that delves into a diverse array of topics, including historical events. The convergence of these seemingly disparate domains, GMO cotton and xkcd historical comics, has piqued the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. As the investigation unfolded, it became evident that these two entities, from different realms, exhibited a surprising connection. It's as if GMO cotton and xkcd comics entered a genetic modification of their own, intertwining their fates in a manner befitting a classic "dad joke."

The interplay between agricultural practices and artistic expressions is often overlooked, as if it were the punchline of an arcane agricultural pun that only a dad at a farmer's market would appreciate. Nonetheless, the correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and the content of xkcd comics is as clear as a well-timed punchline - statistically significant and brimming with intrigue.

The aim of this study is to unravel this unforeseen linkage and to illuminate the underlying factors contributing to it. Much like the punchline of a joke, the correlation between GMO cotton and the themes explored in xkcd comics offers an intellectual puzzle that merits thorough investigation, all while keeping an eye out for any hidden comedic twists.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic linkage between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. Leveraging data from the USDA and employing advanced AI analysis on a curated collection of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this conundrum. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 with a statistically significant p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022.

Our rigorous investigation unveils a peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming and the content of xkcd comics focusing on historical narratives, leaving one to ponder whether it is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy. The idiosyncrasies of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the saying goes, "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta." In a similar vein, the unexpected connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events adds a dash of whimsical intrigue to the scholarly discourse.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has become a prevalent practice, particularly in regions like California, where the climate is conducive to its growth. Simultaneously, the internet has witnessed an upsurge in the popularity of xkcd comics, a webcomic created by Randall Munroe that delves into a diverse array of topics, including historical events. The convergence of these seemingly disparate domains, GMO cotton and xkcd historical comics, has piqued the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. As the investigation unfolded, it became evident that these two entities, from different realms, exhibited a surprising connection. It's as if GMO cotton and xkcd comics entered a genetic modification of their own, intertwining their fates in a manner befitting a classic "dad joke."
The interplay between agricultural practices and artistic expressions is often overlooked, as if it were the punchline of an arcane agricultural pun that only a dad at a farmer's market would appreciate. Nonetheless, the correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and the content of xkcd comics is as clear as a well-timed punchline - statistically significant and brimming with intrigue.
The aim of this study is to unravel this unforeseen linkage and to illuminate the underlying factors contributing to it. Much like the punchline of a joke, the correlation between GMO cotton and the themes explored in xkcd comics offers an intellectual puzzle that merits thorough investigation, all while keeping an eye out for any hidden comedic twists.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The foundations for understanding the interconnection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the production of xkcd comics center around the exploration of biotechnological influences and their impact on creative content creation. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive review of the implications of GMO cotton on agricultural practices, emphasizing the transformative effects on yield and pest resistance. Meanwhile, Doe (2017) delved into the cultural influence of webcomics and their representation of historical narratives, providing a nuanced analysis of the thematic elements that captivate readers.

Nevertheless, the comedic link between GMO cotton and xkcd comics heralds a departure from conventional scholarly discourse, as if a pun on crop rotation patterns suddenly caught the academia's attention. Jones (2020) posited a compelling theoretical framework for unexpected correlations in seemingly unrelated domains, prompting a reconsideration of the boundaries between agriculture and digital creativity. In "Farm to Frame: The Art of Agricultural Expression," the authors contemplate the artist's engagement with agrarian symbolism, offering insights into the intersection of organic and inorganic influences on visual narratives.

The curious synergy observed between the use of GMOs in cotton farming in California and the thematic elements in xkcd comics unveils a realm of inquiry that straddles the line between serendipity and design, not unlike a cleverly crafted dad joke. The playful dynamics of this correlation serve as a testament to the whimsy of the universe, akin to stumbling upon a field of genetically modified cotton and encountering a plot twist in a historical webcomic where Napoleon Bonaparte inexplicably quotes popular modern-day celebrities.

As "The Great Cotton Caper" elucidates, the enigmatic connection between biotechnological agricultural practices and the portrayal of historical events in digital comic strips presents a fertile ground for interdisciplinary investigations. This unprecedented juxtaposition invokes a sense of wonder not unlike discovering a hidden easter egg in a digital landscape, prompting contemplation of the intricate dance between human ingenuity and the capricious forces of chance. It’s as if the universe itself is an avid jokester, seeding the fabric of agricultural progress with easter eggs of historical humor, leaving researchers to unravel its witticisms with each crop harvest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic linkage between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. Leveraging data from the USDA and employing advanced AI analysis on a curated collection of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this conundrum. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 with a statistically significant p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022.

Our rigorous investigation unveils a peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming and the content of xkcd comics focusing on historical narratives, leaving one to ponder whether it is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy. The idiosyncrasies of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the saying goes, "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta." In a similar vein, the unexpected connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events adds a dash of whimsical intrigue to the scholarly discourse.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has become a prevalent practice, particularly in regions like California, where the climate is conducive to its growth. Simultaneously, the internet has witnessed an upsurge in the popularity of xkcd comics, a webcomic created by Randall Munroe that delves into a diverse array of topics, including historical events. The convergence of these seemingly disparate domains, GMO cotton and xkcd historical comics, has piqued the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. As the investigation unfolded, it became evident that these two entities, from different realms, exhibited a surprising connection. It's as if GMO cotton and xkcd comics entered a genetic modification of their own, intertwining their fates in a manner befitting a classic "dad joke."
The interplay between agricultural practices and artistic expressions is often overlooked, as if it were the punchline of an arcane agricultural pun that only a dad at a farmer's market would appreciate. Nonetheless, the correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and the content of xkcd comics is as clear as a well-timed punchline - statistically significant and brimming with intrigue.
The aim of this study is to unravel this unforeseen linkage and to illuminate the underlying factors contributing to it. Much like the punchline of a joke, the correlation between GMO cotton and the themes explored in xkcd comics offers an intellectual puzzle that merits thorough investigation, all while keeping an eye out for any hidden comedic twists.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The research team engaged in a comprehensive and exhaustive data collection process, scouring the vast expanse of the internet to amass information pertinent to GMO cotton cultivation in California and the corpus of xkcd comics focused on historical events. The primary sources of data included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for agricultural statistics related to GMO cotton production in California, as well as the extensive archive of xkcd comics, where AI analysis was employed to identify and categorize comics pertaining to historical narratives. This process ensured a robust and representative dataset for subsequent analysis. It's important to note that we didn't just Google "GMO cotton and xkcd comics" - we took our data collection as seriously as a farmer takes his crop rotation.

Data Filtering and Preprocessing:
To ensure the reliability and integrity of the dataset, rigorous filtering and preprocessing techniques were applied. Any outliers, anomalies, or irrelevant data points were identified and removed with the fastidiousness of a meticulous farmer meticulously plucking weeds from his fields. Additionally, data normalization and transformation methods were implemented to standardize the variables and facilitate the subsequent statistical analyses. The data preprocessing stage aimed to cultivate a dataset as pristine as organic cotton, free from any impurities that could skew the results.

Correlation Analysis:
The crux of the methodology involved conducting a correlation analysis to discern the relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton in California and the content of xkcd comics with historical themes. Employing advanced statistical techniques, including Pearson's correlation coefficient and regression analysis, the research team endeavored to unravel the intricacies of this unanticipated connection. The statistical tests were performed with a level of scrutiny reminiscent of scrutinizing the optimal irrigation levels for cotton cultivation.

Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing (NLP):
In an effort to extract nuanced insights from the xkcd comics, advanced artificial intelligence tools were utilized, including machine learning algorithms and natural language processing (NLP) models. These cutting-edge technologies allowed for the identification and categorization of historical themes within the xkcd comics corpus, enabling a granular analysis of the content. While we didn't have a machine learning algorithm specifically designed to spot "dad jokes," we still managed to extract a wealth of relevant data.

Time Series Analysis:
Given the temporal dimension of the dataset spanning from 2007 to 2022, time series analysis techniques were employed to discern any discernible patterns or trends over time. This temporal analysis sought to illuminate the evolution of the correlation between GMO cotton adoption and the thematic content of xkcd historical comics, akin to a historian tracing the evolution of a timeless joke through the annals of history.

Ethical Considerations:
Throughout the research process, ethical considerations regarding data privacy and intellectual property rights pertaining to xkcd comics were diligently upheld. The research team operated with the utmost integrity, cognizant of the significance of ethical conduct in scholarly investigations. We wanted to make sure our research was as ethical as a non-GMO label on a bag of cottonseed.

Overall, the methodological approach adopted in this study was as rigorous as a boll weevil inspection and aimed to provide a comprehensive elucidation of the peculiar association between GMO cotton adoption and the thematic content of xkcd comics focused on historical events.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6595064, r-squared of 0.4349487, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic linkage between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. Leveraging data from the USDA and employing advanced AI analysis on a curated collection of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this conundrum. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 with a statistically significant p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022.

Our rigorous investigation unveils a peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming and the content of xkcd comics focusing on historical narratives, leaving one to ponder whether it is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy. The idiosyncrasies of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the saying goes, "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta." In a similar vein, the unexpected connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events adds a dash of whimsical intrigue to the scholarly discourse.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has become a prevalent practice, particularly in regions like California, where the climate is conducive to its growth. Simultaneously, the internet has witnessed an upsurge in the popularity of xkcd comics, a webcomic created by Randall Munroe that delves into a diverse array of topics, including historical events. The convergence of these seemingly disparate domains, GMO cotton and xkcd historical comics, has piqued the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. As the investigation unfolded, it became evident that these two entities, from different realms, exhibited a surprising connection. It's as if GMO cotton and xkcd comics entered a genetic modification of their own, intertwining their fates in a manner befitting a classic "dad joke."
The interplay between agricultural practices and artistic expressions is often overlooked, as if it were the punchline of an arcane agricultural pun that only a dad at a farmer's market would appreciate. Nonetheless, the correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and the content of xkcd comics is as clear as a well-timed punchline - statistically significant and brimming with intrigue.
The aim of this study is to unravel this unforeseen linkage and to illuminate the underlying factors contributing to it. Much like the punchline of a joke, the correlation between GMO cotton and the themes explored in xkcd comics offers an intellectual puzzle that merits thorough investigation, all while keeping an eye out for any hidden comedic twists.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics focusing on historical events. Over the time period from 2007 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.6595064, with an r-squared value of 0.4349487, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests a moderately strong relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton and the prevalence of historical narratives in xkcd comics.

The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the observed correlation, presenting a compelling visual representation of the connection between the variables under scrutiny. It is as clear as - dare I say - black and white, much like a classic newspaper comic, only with a twist of scientific intrigue.

The unexpected bond between GMO cotton and historical xkcd comics presents a riddle wrapped in an enigma inside a GMO cotton candy, if you will. The broader implications of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the old adage goes, "I used to play piano by ear, but now I use my hands." Similarly, unraveling the connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events demands a deft touch and a discerning ear for the unexpected.

The findings of this study unveil a fascinating association between the utilization of GMOs in cotton farming and the thematic nuances depicted in xkcd comics, providing an enticing topic for further research. Much like the punchline of a well-crafted joke, this correlation between seemingly disparate subjects impels us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship, all while savoring the intellectual and comedic quirkiness it brings to the scholarly milieu.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic linkage between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. Leveraging data from the USDA and employing advanced AI analysis on a curated collection of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this conundrum. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 with a statistically significant p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022.

Our rigorous investigation unveils a peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming and the content of xkcd comics focusing on historical narratives, leaving one to ponder whether it is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy. The idiosyncrasies of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the saying goes, "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta." In a similar vein, the unexpected connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events adds a dash of whimsical intrigue to the scholarly discourse.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The foundations for understanding the interconnection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the production of xkcd comics center around the exploration of biotechnological influences and their impact on creative content creation. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive review of the implications of GMO cotton on agricultural practices, emphasizing the transformative effects on yield and pest resistance. Meanwhile, Doe (2017) delved into the cultural influence of webcomics and their representation of historical narratives, providing a nuanced analysis of the thematic elements that captivate readers.
Nevertheless, the comedic link between GMO cotton and xkcd comics heralds a departure from conventional scholarly discourse, as if a pun on crop rotation patterns suddenly caught the academia's attention. Jones (2020) posited a compelling theoretical framework for unexpected correlations in seemingly unrelated domains, prompting a reconsideration of the boundaries between agriculture and digital creativity. In "Farm to Frame: The Art of Agricultural Expression," the authors contemplate the artist's engagement with agrarian symbolism, offering insights into the intersection of organic and inorganic influences on visual narratives.
The curious synergy observed between the use of GMOs in cotton farming in California and the thematic elements in xkcd comics unveils a realm of inquiry that straddles the line between serendipity and design, not unlike a cleverly crafted dad joke. The playful dynamics of this correlation serve as a testament to the whimsy of the universe, akin to stumbling upon a field of genetically modified cotton and encountering a plot twist in a historical webcomic where Napoleon Bonaparte inexplicably quotes popular modern-day celebrities.
As "The Great Cotton Caper" elucidates, the enigmatic connection between biotechnological agricultural practices and the portrayal of historical events in digital comic strips presents a fertile ground for interdisciplinary investigations. This unprecedented juxtaposition invokes a sense of wonder not unlike discovering a hidden easter egg in a digital landscape, prompting contemplation of the intricate dance between human ingenuity and the capricious forces of chance. It’s as if the universe itself is an avid jokester, seeding the fabric of agricultural progress with easter eggs of historical humor, leaving researchers to unravel its witticisms with each crop harvest.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics focusing on historical events. Over the time period from 2007 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.6595064, with an r-squared value of 0.4349487, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests a moderately strong relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton and the prevalence of historical narratives in xkcd comics.
The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the observed correlation, presenting a compelling visual representation of the connection between the variables under scrutiny. It is as clear as - dare I say - black and white, much like a classic newspaper comic, only with a twist of scientific intrigue.
The unexpected bond between GMO cotton and historical xkcd comics presents a riddle wrapped in an enigma inside a GMO cotton candy, if you will. The broader implications of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the old adage goes, "I used to play piano by ear, but now I use my hands." Similarly, unraveling the connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events demands a deft touch and a discerning ear for the unexpected.
The findings of this study unveil a fascinating association between the utilization of GMOs in cotton farming and the thematic nuances depicted in xkcd comics, providing an enticing topic for further research. Much like the punchline of a well-crafted joke, this correlation between seemingly disparate subjects impels us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship, all while savoring the intellectual and comedic quirkiness it brings to the scholarly milieu.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study substantiate the prior research on the unexpected correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics related to historical events. This correlation, akin to stumbling upon a field of genetically modified cotton and encountering a plot twist in a historical webcomic where Napoleon Bonaparte inexplicably quotes popular modern-day celebrities, has garnered significant attention from the scholarly community. The statistically significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.6595064, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the moderately strong relationship between the use of GMO cotton and the prevalence of historical narratives in xkcd comics.

The illuminated association between GMO cotton and historical xkcd comics prompts a reconsideration of the boundaries between agriculture and creative expression. As "The Great Cotton Caper" explores, the enigmatic connection between biotechnological agricultural practices and the portrayal of historical events in digital comic strips presents a fertile ground for interdisciplinary investigations, much like a field primed for a bountiful harvest of minute by minute content. These results bolster the idea posited by Smith (2015) on the transformative effects of GMO cotton on agricultural practices, underscoring the profound impact of biotechnological influences across seemingly unrelated domains.

Moreover, the unexpected bond between GMO cotton and historical xkcd comics raises intriguing questions regarding the mechanisms driving this correlation. Further exploration of this unlikely relationship promises to unravel the idiosyncrasies of agricultural and creative interactions, analogous to peeling back the layers of a genetically modified onion. As the old adage goes, “I used to play piano by ear, but now I use my hands.” Similarly, unraveling the connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events demands a deft touch and a discerning ear for the unexpected. This insight aligns with Jones (2020)’s theoretical framework for unexpected correlations in seemingly unrelated domains, highlighting the need for nuanced inquiry into the unanticipated synergies that underpin the agricultural-creative dynamic.

The unexpected synergies observed in this study lend an air of whimsical intrigue and scholarly vibrancy to the discourse, reminiscent of an intriguing riddle wrapped in an enigma inside a GMO cotton candy. The scholarly community eagerly awaits further investigations into this unanticipated correlation, a conundrum that leaves us pondering, much like a physicist staring at the structures of a tangled ball of yarn, whether this unlikely alliance is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy orchestrated by the mischievous hand of fate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in California and xkcd comics published about history. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the enigmatic linkage between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. Leveraging data from the USDA and employing advanced AI analysis on a curated collection of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this conundrum. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 with a statistically significant p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022.

Our rigorous investigation unveils a peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming and the content of xkcd comics focusing on historical narratives, leaving one to ponder whether it is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy. The idiosyncrasies of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the saying goes, "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta." In a similar vein, the unexpected connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events adds a dash of whimsical intrigue to the scholarly discourse.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has become a prevalent practice, particularly in regions like California, where the climate is conducive to its growth. Simultaneously, the internet has witnessed an upsurge in the popularity of xkcd comics, a webcomic created by Randall Munroe that delves into a diverse array of topics, including historical events. The convergence of these seemingly disparate domains, GMO cotton and xkcd historical comics, has piqued the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. As the investigation unfolded, it became evident that these two entities, from different realms, exhibited a surprising connection. It's as if GMO cotton and xkcd comics entered a genetic modification of their own, intertwining their fates in a manner befitting a classic "dad joke."
The interplay between agricultural practices and artistic expressions is often overlooked, as if it were the punchline of an arcane agricultural pun that only a dad at a farmer's market would appreciate. Nonetheless, the correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and the content of xkcd comics is as clear as a well-timed punchline - statistically significant and brimming with intrigue.
The aim of this study is to unravel this unforeseen linkage and to illuminate the underlying factors contributing to it. Much like the punchline of a joke, the correlation between GMO cotton and the themes explored in xkcd comics offers an intellectual puzzle that merits thorough investigation, all while keeping an eye out for any hidden comedic twists.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics focusing on historical events. Over the time period from 2007 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was found to be 0.6595064, with an r-squared value of 0.4349487, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This suggests a moderately strong relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton and the prevalence of historical narratives in xkcd comics.
The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the observed correlation, presenting a compelling visual representation of the connection between the variables under scrutiny. It is as clear as - dare I say - black and white, much like a classic newspaper comic, only with a twist of scientific intrigue.
The unexpected bond between GMO cotton and historical xkcd comics presents a riddle wrapped in an enigma inside a GMO cotton candy, if you will. The broader implications of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the old adage goes, "I used to play piano by ear, but now I use my hands." Similarly, unraveling the connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events demands a deft touch and a discerning ear for the unexpected.
The findings of this study unveil a fascinating association between the utilization of GMOs in cotton farming and the thematic nuances depicted in xkcd comics, providing an enticing topic for further research. Much like the punchline of a well-crafted joke, this correlation between seemingly disparate subjects impels us to scrutinize the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship, all while savoring the intellectual and comedic quirkiness it brings to the scholarly milieu.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the research has uncovered a compelling correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming in California and the thematic content of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. The findings demonstrate a statistically significant positive relationship, indicating a moderately strong linkage between these two seemingly unrelated domains. It's as if GMO cotton and historical xkcd comics shared a genetic sequence that only a well-crafted dad joke could elucidate.

The unexpected connection between agricultural practices and creative expressions truly adds a layer of whimsy to the scholarly discourse. It's akin to the surprise punchline of a dad joke - just when you think you've figured it out, there's an unexpected twist that leaves everyone chuckling.

In light of these findings, it's clear that further exploration of this curious correlation would be both intellectually stimulating and a source of entertaining puns. However, strictly from a scientific perspective... "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." This research suggests that the correlation between GMO cotton and historical xkcd comics is a fertile ground for future inquiry, and the enigmatic interplay between these domains deserves more attention, much like a good dad joke that never gets old.

Therefore, we assert that the findings of this study are comprehensive and robust, and we adamantly declare that no further research is needed in this lighthearted realm of scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Genetic Giggle Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Innovation and Humor Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO Glee: A Correlation Between Cotton's Modified Gene and xkcd Comics Scene with an abstract of This study delves into the enigmatic linkage between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in California and the publication of xkcd comics pertaining to historical events. Leveraging data from the USDA and employing advanced AI analysis on a curated collection of xkcd comics, our research team sought to shed light on this conundrum. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.6595064 with a statistically significant p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022.
Our rigorous investigation unveils a peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMOs in cotton farming and the content of xkcd comics focusing on historical narratives, leaving one to ponder whether it is mere coincidence or a quirky synergy. The idiosyncrasies of this correlation prompt us to consider the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and creative expression. As the saying goes, "What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta." In a similar vein, the unexpected connection between biotechnology in agriculture and webcomics on historical events adds a dash of whimsical intrigue to the scholarly discourse.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified organisms, GMOs, cotton cultivation, California, xkcd comics, historical events, USDA data, AI analysis, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, GMO adoption, cotton farming, agricultural practices, biotechnology, webcomics, scholarly discourse

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in California
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in California that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in California

xkcd comics published about history
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about history
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about history

Correlation r = 0.6595064 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4349487 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 43.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about history) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in California) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0054. 0.0054459311732147890000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.66 in 0.54% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 184 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.24, 0.87 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in California (GMO cotton %)4781992191510326103310
xkcd comics published about history (xkcd comics)12151624202818272418122028251922




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,7,8,19,9,21,9,15,10,3,2,6,10,3,3,10,])
array_2 = np.array([12,15,16,24,20,28,18,27,24,18,12,20,28,25,19,22,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in California"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about history"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1851 · Black Variable ID: 769 · Red Variable ID: 20004
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0