about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,830 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Cruz and the second variable is Associates degrees awarded in Nursing.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

More people named Cruz inspired by 70s and 80s TV detective shows. Chose the nursing field to crack the case of the mysterious ailments and solve the riddles of the human body.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a Polaroid photo capturing a bustling graduation ceremony. In the scene, a sea of graduates wearing caps and gowns fills the room. The name "Cruz" is called out, and a wave of cheers erupts, indicating the name's popularity. The majority of the graduates are holding degrees in nursing, some with "Registered Nurse" and "Other" disciplines clearly printed on their certificates, showcasing the high number of associate degrees awarded in the nursing field. The atmosphere is one of joy and accomplishment as the graduates celebrate their achievements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Surrealism a Polaroid photo Scalar art Macabre
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling graduation ceremony, a sea of graduates wearing caps and gowns fills the room. The name "Cruz" is called out and a wave of cheers erupts, indicating the name's popularity. At the same time, the majority of the graduates are holding degrees in nursing, some with "Registered Nurse" and "Other" disciplines clearly printed on their certificates, showcasing the high number of associate degrees awarded in the nursing field.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling graduation ceremony, a sea of graduates wearing caps and gowns fills the room. The name "Cruz" is called out and a wave of cheers erupts, indicating the name's popularity. At the same time, the majority of the graduates are holding degrees in nursing, some with "Registered Nurse" and "Other" disciplines clearly printed on their certificates, showcasing the high number of associate degrees awarded in the nursing field. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a Polaroid photo capturing a bustling graduation ceremony. In the scene, a sea of graduates wearing caps and gowns fills the room. The name "Cruz" is called out, and a wave of cheers erupts, indicating the name's popularity. The majority of the graduates are holding degrees in nursing, some with "Registered Nurse" and "Other" disciplines clearly printed on their certificates, showcasing the high number of associate degrees awarded in the nursing field. The atmosphere is one of joy and accomplishment as the graduates celebrate their achievements.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Cruz positively influenced Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards

The Journal of Irreverent Sociolinguistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and National Center for Education Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing link between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. Employing data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the timeframe of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this investigation extend far beyond mere statistical analysis, with potentially profound implications for the intersection of nomenclature, education, and professional pursuits. Indeed, this jocularly named inquiry sheds light on the unassuming impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing link between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. Employing data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the timeframe of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this investigation extend far beyond mere statistical analysis, with potentially profound implications for the intersection of nomenclature, education, and professional pursuits. Indeed, this jocularly named inquiry sheds light on the unassuming impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of nomenclature, one cannot disregard the influence of names on various aspects of life. From their phonetic resonances to their historical significances, names have the uncanny ability to captivate our attention and leave an indelible mark on society. This study aims to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. While the prospect of such an association may initially appear whimsical, our rigorous analysis has unearthed a remarkably robust correlation that defies mere happenstance.

The etymological significance of the name "Cruz," derived from the Latin word for "cross," may seem tangential to the domain of nursing education. However, as we delve into the statistical underpinnings of this inquiry, we are compelled to contemplate whether there might be deeper, more subtle forces at play. Could it be that individuals who bear this distinctive appellation are drawn, consciously or otherwise, to the noble pursuit of nursing? Or does the resonance of "Cruz" exude an ineffable charm that compels educational institutions to confer nursing degrees upon its bearers?

Our analysis, drawing upon data meticulously compiled from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, has yielded a correlation coefficient that attests to the intriguing coupling of nomenclature trends and academic accolades. The unassuming ascendancy of the name "Cruz" and the commendation of associate degrees in nursing and related fields are inextricably linked, as evidenced by the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the temporal confines of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the mere interplay of numbers and trends, traversing into the realm of societal influences on professional pathways.

Presented within the ostensibly whimsical premise of this study lies a serious interrogation of the interplay between individual nomenclature and career choices. While the findings of this investigation may seem fanciful at first glance, they underscore the profound and often overlooked impacts of names on vocational trajectories. Through the lens of statistical scrutiny, we illuminate an otherwise obscured facet of the complex interplay between nomenclature, individual choices, and professional pursuits.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall expound upon the methodology employed, the precise nature of the correlation unveiled, and the broader implications of our findings. Much like the serendipitous convergence of seemingly incongruous elements, the correlation between the name "Cruz" and the conferral of nursing degrees functions as a curious enigma that invites further contemplation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing link between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. Employing data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the timeframe of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this investigation extend far beyond mere statistical analysis, with potentially profound implications for the intersection of nomenclature, education, and professional pursuits. Indeed, this jocularly named inquiry sheds light on the unassuming impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of nomenclature, one cannot disregard the influence of names on various aspects of life. From their phonetic resonances to their historical significances, names have the uncanny ability to captivate our attention and leave an indelible mark on society. This study aims to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. While the prospect of such an association may initially appear whimsical, our rigorous analysis has unearthed a remarkably robust correlation that defies mere happenstance.
The etymological significance of the name "Cruz," derived from the Latin word for "cross," may seem tangential to the domain of nursing education. However, as we delve into the statistical underpinnings of this inquiry, we are compelled to contemplate whether there might be deeper, more subtle forces at play. Could it be that individuals who bear this distinctive appellation are drawn, consciously or otherwise, to the noble pursuit of nursing? Or does the resonance of "Cruz" exude an ineffable charm that compels educational institutions to confer nursing degrees upon its bearers?
Our analysis, drawing upon data meticulously compiled from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, has yielded a correlation coefficient that attests to the intriguing coupling of nomenclature trends and academic accolades. The unassuming ascendancy of the name "Cruz" and the commendation of associate degrees in nursing and related fields are inextricably linked, as evidenced by the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the temporal confines of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the mere interplay of numbers and trends, traversing into the realm of societal influences on professional pathways.
Presented within the ostensibly whimsical premise of this study lies a serious interrogation of the interplay between individual nomenclature and career choices. While the findings of this investigation may seem fanciful at first glance, they underscore the profound and often overlooked impacts of names on vocational trajectories. Through the lens of statistical scrutiny, we illuminate an otherwise obscured facet of the complex interplay between nomenclature, individual choices, and professional pursuits.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall expound upon the methodology employed, the precise nature of the correlation unveiled, and the broader implications of our findings. Much like the serendipitous convergence of seemingly incongruous elements, the correlation between the name "Cruz" and the conferral of nursing degrees functions as a curious enigma that invites further contemplation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Researchers have long sought to uncover the mysterious ways in which nomenclature influences various aspects of human life. Academic inquiries into the relationships between names and societal phenomenon have yielded fascinating insights, from the impact of names on career success to their influence on social interactions. Smith, in "The Power of a Name," delves into the complexities of nomenclature and its far-reaching implications, shedding light on the subtle, often overlooked nuances of names in shaping our lives.

Moving on from the serious to the absurd, Doe's "The Name Game: A Comedic Exploration of Nomenclature" offers a lighthearted take on the subject, intertwining scholarly research with whimsical anecdotes. It takes a playful, yet academically informed, approach to the study of names and their peculiar influences.

Jones, in "The Name Effect: Unraveling the Enigmatic Connections," presents an intriguing exploration of the impact of names on vocational trajectories, societal perceptions, and individual choices. The author navigates through the intricate web of nomenclature influences with scholarly rigor, unearthing correlations that defy conventional wisdom.

Shifting gears from the realm of non-fiction, we encounter fictional works that whimsically brush against the edges of our present study. "Nurse Nancy and the Curious Case of Cruz," authored by J.K. Scrubs, immerses readers in a world where the eponymous protagonist navigates the complexities of nursing education and discovers unexpected connections between nomenclature and academic accolades.

In the equally captivating realm of television, the popular series "The Nursing Nomenclature Chronicles" intricately weaves together the world of nursing education and the enigmatic allure of popular names. As a research-focused sitcom, it provides both entertainment and pseudo-academic musings on the tacit influence of names on professional pursuits.

It is within this multifaceted landscape of serious research, whimsical storytelling, and quirky pop culture representations that we set the stage for our own investigation into the compelling association between the popularity of the name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and National Center for Education Statistics . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing link between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. Employing data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the timeframe of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this investigation extend far beyond mere statistical analysis, with potentially profound implications for the intersection of nomenclature, education, and professional pursuits. Indeed, this jocularly named inquiry sheds light on the unassuming impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of nomenclature, one cannot disregard the influence of names on various aspects of life. From their phonetic resonances to their historical significances, names have the uncanny ability to captivate our attention and leave an indelible mark on society. This study aims to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. While the prospect of such an association may initially appear whimsical, our rigorous analysis has unearthed a remarkably robust correlation that defies mere happenstance.
The etymological significance of the name "Cruz," derived from the Latin word for "cross," may seem tangential to the domain of nursing education. However, as we delve into the statistical underpinnings of this inquiry, we are compelled to contemplate whether there might be deeper, more subtle forces at play. Could it be that individuals who bear this distinctive appellation are drawn, consciously or otherwise, to the noble pursuit of nursing? Or does the resonance of "Cruz" exude an ineffable charm that compels educational institutions to confer nursing degrees upon its bearers?
Our analysis, drawing upon data meticulously compiled from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, has yielded a correlation coefficient that attests to the intriguing coupling of nomenclature trends and academic accolades. The unassuming ascendancy of the name "Cruz" and the commendation of associate degrees in nursing and related fields are inextricably linked, as evidenced by the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the temporal confines of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the mere interplay of numbers and trends, traversing into the realm of societal influences on professional pathways.
Presented within the ostensibly whimsical premise of this study lies a serious interrogation of the interplay between individual nomenclature and career choices. While the findings of this investigation may seem fanciful at first glance, they underscore the profound and often overlooked impacts of names on vocational trajectories. Through the lens of statistical scrutiny, we illuminate an otherwise obscured facet of the complex interplay between nomenclature, individual choices, and professional pursuits.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall expound upon the methodology employed, the precise nature of the correlation unveiled, and the broader implications of our findings. Much like the serendipitous convergence of seemingly incongruous elements, the correlation between the name "Cruz" and the conferral of nursing degrees functions as a curious enigma that invites further contemplation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the perplexing connection between the prevalence of the name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields, a multifaceted and comprehensive research methodology was employed. Data collection commenced by mining the extensive archives of the US Social Security Administration for the frequency of the first name "Cruz" across the years 2011 to 2021. Utilizing sophisticated digital tools and perhaps a bit of luck, a thorough corpus of nomenclature trends was meticulously compiled, taking into account regional variations, temporal fluctuations, and the occasional clerical error or two.

Simultaneously, the National Center for Education Statistics was tapped for information on the annual issuance of associate degrees in nursing, registered nurse, and related disciplines. This rigorous search for data on educational commendations involved navigating the labyrinthine depths of institutional records, interpreting cryptic acronyms, and occasionally navigating the perilous maze of hyperlinks.

Having accumulated these disparate, yet potentially interconnected datasets, a convoluted algorithm – concocted by a group of slightly sleep-deprived statisticians – was unleashed upon the numerical quarry. This algorithm, a blend of regression analysis, correlation computations, and the occasional secret ingredient, churned through the numbers with a fervor that can only be likened to a culinary maestro perfecting a delicate soufflé.

The correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cruz" and the awarding of associate degrees in nursing, registered nurse, and related fields was then ascertained with exacting precision, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This statistically resplendent revelation showcases a stronger association than typically encountered in the whimsical realm of nomenclature investigations, much like stumbling upon a particularly striking hybrid flower in the midst of an ordinary garden.

Certainly, while the data collection and analysis process may have harbored its fair share of arcane complexities and unforeseen challenges, the robustness of the results and the tantalizing implications of the correlation discovered underscore the efficacy of this multidimensional research methodology.

In the subsequent section, the delightful intricacies of our findings will be expounded upon, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking examination of the unexpected alignment of nomenclature trends and educational accolades.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and National Center for Education Statistics .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9179723, r-squared of 0.8426732, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing link between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. Employing data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the timeframe of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this investigation extend far beyond mere statistical analysis, with potentially profound implications for the intersection of nomenclature, education, and professional pursuits. Indeed, this jocularly named inquiry sheds light on the unassuming impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of nomenclature, one cannot disregard the influence of names on various aspects of life. From their phonetic resonances to their historical significances, names have the uncanny ability to captivate our attention and leave an indelible mark on society. This study aims to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. While the prospect of such an association may initially appear whimsical, our rigorous analysis has unearthed a remarkably robust correlation that defies mere happenstance.
The etymological significance of the name "Cruz," derived from the Latin word for "cross," may seem tangential to the domain of nursing education. However, as we delve into the statistical underpinnings of this inquiry, we are compelled to contemplate whether there might be deeper, more subtle forces at play. Could it be that individuals who bear this distinctive appellation are drawn, consciously or otherwise, to the noble pursuit of nursing? Or does the resonance of "Cruz" exude an ineffable charm that compels educational institutions to confer nursing degrees upon its bearers?
Our analysis, drawing upon data meticulously compiled from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, has yielded a correlation coefficient that attests to the intriguing coupling of nomenclature trends and academic accolades. The unassuming ascendancy of the name "Cruz" and the commendation of associate degrees in nursing and related fields are inextricably linked, as evidenced by the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the temporal confines of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the mere interplay of numbers and trends, traversing into the realm of societal influences on professional pathways.
Presented within the ostensibly whimsical premise of this study lies a serious interrogation of the interplay between individual nomenclature and career choices. While the findings of this investigation may seem fanciful at first glance, they underscore the profound and often overlooked impacts of names on vocational trajectories. Through the lens of statistical scrutiny, we illuminate an otherwise obscured facet of the complex interplay between nomenclature, individual choices, and professional pursuits.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall expound upon the methodology employed, the precise nature of the correlation unveiled, and the broader implications of our findings. Much like the serendipitous convergence of seemingly incongruous elements, the correlation between the name "Cruz" and the conferral of nursing degrees functions as a curious enigma that invites further contemplation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon analyzing the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, it becomes patently clear that the popularity of the first name "Cruz" exhibits a strong correlation with the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. From the years 2011 to 2021, our research team found a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9179723, indicating a hearty relationship between the aforementioned variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.8426732, signifying that approximately 84.27% of the variation in the number of nursing degrees conferred can be attributed to the popularity of the name "Cruz." It is worth acknowledging that the p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the statistical significance of this relationship, offering compelling evidence for the association.

To visually encapsulate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, which illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the steadfast connection between the prevalence of the name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related disciplines. The salient convergence of data points on the plot unmistakably demonstrates the resolute correlation between name popularity and educational accolades, affirming the substantive nature of this linkage.

In essence, our study unearths an unexpected association between nomenclature trends and educational commendations, prompting a reevaluation of the intricate ways in which individual names may interplay with academic and professional pursuits. While these findings may seem whimsical at first blush, they underscore the undeniable impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing link between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. Employing data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the timeframe of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this investigation extend far beyond mere statistical analysis, with potentially profound implications for the intersection of nomenclature, education, and professional pursuits. Indeed, this jocularly named inquiry sheds light on the unassuming impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Researchers have long sought to uncover the mysterious ways in which nomenclature influences various aspects of human life. Academic inquiries into the relationships between names and societal phenomenon have yielded fascinating insights, from the impact of names on career success to their influence on social interactions. Smith, in "The Power of a Name," delves into the complexities of nomenclature and its far-reaching implications, shedding light on the subtle, often overlooked nuances of names in shaping our lives.
Moving on from the serious to the absurd, Doe's "The Name Game: A Comedic Exploration of Nomenclature" offers a lighthearted take on the subject, intertwining scholarly research with whimsical anecdotes. It takes a playful, yet academically informed, approach to the study of names and their peculiar influences.
Jones, in "The Name Effect: Unraveling the Enigmatic Connections," presents an intriguing exploration of the impact of names on vocational trajectories, societal perceptions, and individual choices. The author navigates through the intricate web of nomenclature influences with scholarly rigor, unearthing correlations that defy conventional wisdom.
Shifting gears from the realm of non-fiction, we encounter fictional works that whimsically brush against the edges of our present study. "Nurse Nancy and the Curious Case of Cruz," authored by J.K. Scrubs, immerses readers in a world where the eponymous protagonist navigates the complexities of nursing education and discovers unexpected connections between nomenclature and academic accolades.
In the equally captivating realm of television, the popular series "The Nursing Nomenclature Chronicles" intricately weaves together the world of nursing education and the enigmatic allure of popular names. As a research-focused sitcom, it provides both entertainment and pseudo-academic musings on the tacit influence of names on professional pursuits.
It is within this multifaceted landscape of serious research, whimsical storytelling, and quirky pop culture representations that we set the stage for our own investigation into the compelling association between the popularity of the name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, it becomes patently clear that the popularity of the first name "Cruz" exhibits a strong correlation with the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. From the years 2011 to 2021, our research team found a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9179723, indicating a hearty relationship between the aforementioned variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.8426732, signifying that approximately 84.27% of the variation in the number of nursing degrees conferred can be attributed to the popularity of the name "Cruz." It is worth acknowledging that the p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the statistical significance of this relationship, offering compelling evidence for the association.
To visually encapsulate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, which illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the steadfast connection between the prevalence of the name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related disciplines. The salient convergence of data points on the plot unmistakably demonstrates the resolute correlation between name popularity and educational accolades, affirming the substantive nature of this linkage.
In essence, our study unearths an unexpected association between nomenclature trends and educational commendations, prompting a reevaluation of the intricate ways in which individual names may interplay with academic and professional pursuits. While these findings may seem whimsical at first blush, they underscore the undeniable impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation corroborate and expand upon the previous research into the esoteric realm of nomenclature influences. While the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry may elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, our findings underscore the substantial correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in the nursing domain. This discovery tantalizingly echoes the pioneering work of Smith, who plumbed the depths of names and their nuanced impact on professional trajectories, and Jones, who deftly unravelled the enigmatic ways in which names shape societal perceptions and individual choices.

In aligning our study with existing scholarly endeavors, our endeavor imparts a reverberating message: there exists a profound and consequential linkage between nomenclature trends and educational accolades, a captivating revelation in its own right. The robust statistical support for this association, marked by a correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, marshals compelling evidence for the formidable intertwining of name popularity and academic commendations.

In reconciling the whimsically named "Nurse Nancy and the Curious Case of Cruz" by J.K. Scrubs and the research-focused sitcom "The Nursing Nomenclature Chronicles" with our own scholarly inquiry, we recognize that fiction and pseudo-academic musings can indeed intersect with empirical evidence. As we chart new territory in the curiously entwined realms of names and vocational pursuits, our investigation contributes to the burgeoning discourse on the sometimes surreptitious influences of nomenclature.

As we acknowledge the unexpected nature of our findings, it is important to delve further into the implications of this correlation. Our research poster-child, the scatterplot shown in Fig. 1, visually encapsulates the resolute correlation between name popularity and educational accolades, underscoring the substantive nature of this peculiarity.

In navigating through the labyrinthine pathways of nomenclature and academic pursuits, our study may indeed elicit mirth or incredulous glances. Yet, it is our earnest hope that our findings animate a newfound curiosity in the curious ways in which names subtly but assuredly interlace with the tapestry of professional and educational endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and Associates degrees awarded in Nursing, registered nurse and other. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing link between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. Employing data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the timeframe of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this investigation extend far beyond mere statistical analysis, with potentially profound implications for the intersection of nomenclature, education, and professional pursuits. Indeed, this jocularly named inquiry sheds light on the unassuming impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of nomenclature, one cannot disregard the influence of names on various aspects of life. From their phonetic resonances to their historical significances, names have the uncanny ability to captivate our attention and leave an indelible mark on society. This study aims to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. While the prospect of such an association may initially appear whimsical, our rigorous analysis has unearthed a remarkably robust correlation that defies mere happenstance.
The etymological significance of the name "Cruz," derived from the Latin word for "cross," may seem tangential to the domain of nursing education. However, as we delve into the statistical underpinnings of this inquiry, we are compelled to contemplate whether there might be deeper, more subtle forces at play. Could it be that individuals who bear this distinctive appellation are drawn, consciously or otherwise, to the noble pursuit of nursing? Or does the resonance of "Cruz" exude an ineffable charm that compels educational institutions to confer nursing degrees upon its bearers?
Our analysis, drawing upon data meticulously compiled from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, has yielded a correlation coefficient that attests to the intriguing coupling of nomenclature trends and academic accolades. The unassuming ascendancy of the name "Cruz" and the commendation of associate degrees in nursing and related fields are inextricably linked, as evidenced by the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the temporal confines of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the mere interplay of numbers and trends, traversing into the realm of societal influences on professional pathways.
Presented within the ostensibly whimsical premise of this study lies a serious interrogation of the interplay between individual nomenclature and career choices. While the findings of this investigation may seem fanciful at first glance, they underscore the profound and often overlooked impacts of names on vocational trajectories. Through the lens of statistical scrutiny, we illuminate an otherwise obscured facet of the complex interplay between nomenclature, individual choices, and professional pursuits.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we shall expound upon the methodology employed, the precise nature of the correlation unveiled, and the broader implications of our findings. Much like the serendipitous convergence of seemingly incongruous elements, the correlation between the name "Cruz" and the conferral of nursing degrees functions as a curious enigma that invites further contemplation.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, it becomes patently clear that the popularity of the first name "Cruz" exhibits a strong correlation with the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. From the years 2011 to 2021, our research team found a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9179723, indicating a hearty relationship between the aforementioned variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.8426732, signifying that approximately 84.27% of the variation in the number of nursing degrees conferred can be attributed to the popularity of the name "Cruz." It is worth acknowledging that the p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the statistical significance of this relationship, offering compelling evidence for the association.
To visually encapsulate this compelling correlation, we present Fig. 1, which illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the steadfast connection between the prevalence of the name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related disciplines. The salient convergence of data points on the plot unmistakably demonstrates the resolute correlation between name popularity and educational accolades, affirming the substantive nature of this linkage.
In essence, our study unearths an unexpected association between nomenclature trends and educational commendations, prompting a reevaluation of the intricate ways in which individual names may interplay with academic and professional pursuits. While these findings may seem whimsical at first blush, they underscore the undeniable impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

**[[CONCLUSION]]**

The findings of this study explicate a compelling association between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields, illuminating the incisive interplay between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 elevate this inquiry beyond the realm of mere happenstance and into an arena of profound implications for nomenclature-mediated vocational pathways. Our research hints at a tantalizing prospect—that the seemingly innocuous name "Cruz" may harbor an inexplicably potent allure for nursing education, invoking a serendipitous connection between nomenclature and vocation. It begs a deeper exploration, perhaps a journey through the convoluted corridors of nomenclature's influence on professional pursuits, replete with pun-tential insights and offbeat revelations. However, it behooves us to acknowledge the inherent whimsy and intrigue of this correlation, a reminder of the capricious nature of statistical anomalies and the eyebrow-raising wonder of unanticipated findings.

In conclusion, our study underscores the compelling, albeit peculiar, correlation between the popularity of the name "Cruz" and the conferral of nursing degrees, urging contemplation of the idiosyncrasies of nomenclature's impact on academic and professional pathways. With these revelatory insights in mind, it seems this investigation ventures into a domain of inquiry where statistical analyses converge with the curious machinations of nomenclature, thereby shedding light on the capricious interplay between names and vocational choices. As such, we boldly assert that further discursive elaboration on this enthralling topic may unearth more rib-tickling revelations and offbeat observations, but it is our scholarly duty to declare, with a whimsical nod and a chuckle, that no further research may be needed in this delightfully quirky domain. After all, sometimes, the enigma of "Cruz" and nursing degrees is best appreciated with a smile and a raised eyebrow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Irreverent Sociolinguistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Name-Based Occupational Achievement Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cruisin' for an Associative Degree: The Popularity of the Name Cruz and Its Correlation with Nursing Education Awards with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing link between the prevalence of the first name "Cruz" and the conferral of associate degrees in nursing and related fields. Employing data sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between nomenclature trends and educational commendations. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9179723 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 within the timeframe of 2011 to 2021. The implications of this investigation extend far beyond mere statistical analysis, with potentially profound implications for the intersection of nomenclature, education, and professional pursuits. Indeed, this jocularly named inquiry sheds light on the unassuming impact of moniker popularity on vocational pathways.

ChatGPT:

"Cruz name popularity," "nursing education awards," "associative degree correlation," "social security administration data," "national center for education statistics," "nomenclature trends," "statistical analysis," "vocational pathways," "moniker popularity."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Cruz
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Cruz
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Cruz

Associates degrees awarded in Nursing
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Nursing, registered nurse and other
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Nursing

Correlation r = 0.9179723 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8426732 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Nursing) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Cruz) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.7E-5. 0.0000673647026451427800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.0067% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,845 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Cruz (Babies born)1127126412771251109210369941045113411211149
Associates degrees awarded in Nursing (Degrees awarded)8302184567863778637882904785187705177658810708286084117




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1127,1264,1277,1251,1092,1036,994,1045,1134,1121,1149,])
array_2 = np.array([83021,84567,86377,86378,82904,78518,77051,77658,81070,82860,84117,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Cruz"
array_2_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Nursing"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1830 · Black Variable ID: 3452 · Red Variable ID: 1235
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0