about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,820 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of paralegals in Alabama and the second variable is Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The influx of paralegals in Alabama has led to a surge in penguin-related lawsuits. As a result, more people are seeking flights to Antarctica to attend these unconventional court cases. With penguin paternity disputes and ice theft on the rise, it's no wonder there's a sudden demand for legal representation in the South Pole. Remember, when it comes to bird law, the Antarctic legal system is truly taking flight!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Please generate an image of a Polaroid photo capturing the scene at a busy law office in Alabama. Several paralegals are engrossed in their work at their desks, surrounded by piles of legal documents. In the background, a computer screen displays a Google search for "flights to Antarctica" as one of the paralegals excitedly plans an adventurous vacation. The image should evoke a sense of professional focus juxtaposed with the yearning for exploration and adventure. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Data cyber art a Polaroid photo Cutsy graphics Steampunk
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling law office in Alabama, several paralegals are busy at their desks, diligently working on legal documents. In the background, a computer screen shows a Google search for "flights to Antarctica" as one of the paralegals eagerly plans an adventurous vacation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling law office in Alabama, several paralegals are busy at their desks, diligently working on legal documents. In the background, a computer screen shows a Google search for "flights to Antarctica" as one of the paralegals eagerly plans an adventurous vacation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Please generate an image of a Polaroid photo capturing the scene at a busy law office in Alabama. Several paralegals are engrossed in their work at their desks, surrounded by piles of legal documents. In the background, a computer screen displays a Google search for "flights to Antarctica" as one of the paralegals excitedly plans an adventurous vacation. The image should evoke a sense of professional focus juxtaposed with the yearning for exploration and adventure.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of paralegals in Alabama caused flights to Antarctica (Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'

The Journal of Quirky Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the peculiar relationship between the number of paralegals in the state of Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Our research team embarked on this exploration with a healthy curiosity and a dose of humor, knowing that unravelling this enigma could lead to some unexpected findings, akin to stumbling upon a penguin in a courtroom.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 2004 to 2020. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01, indicating a surprisingly strong connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This relationship, much like a good dad joke, may initially elicit a chuckle of disbelief, yet it persists with its intriguing statistical significance.

We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this comical quirk of statistical patterns further, and possibly uncover the reasons behind this perplexing correlation, while keeping in mind that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to a wealth of knowledge, much like paralegals and penguin-loving travelers seeking flights to the southernmost continent.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the peculiar relationship between the number of paralegals in the state of Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Our research team embarked on this exploration with a healthy curiosity and a dose of humor, knowing that unravelling this enigma could lead to some unexpected findings, akin to stumbling upon a penguin in a courtroom.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 2004 to 2020. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01, indicating a surprisingly strong connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This relationship, much like a good dad joke, may initially elicit a chuckle of disbelief, yet it persists with its intriguing statistical significance.

We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this comical quirk of statistical patterns further, and possibly uncover the reasons behind this perplexing correlation, while keeping in mind that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to a wealth of knowledge, much like paralegals and penguin-loving travelers seeking flights to the southernmost continent.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, esteemed colleagues, and anyone who's ever wondered what paralegals and penguins have in common, welcome to the oddest statistical investigation you'll encounter this year. Imagine a scenario where legal professionals of Alabama and adventurous travelers with a penchant for Antarctic exploration intersect – it sounds like the setup for a joke, but our study aims to shed light on this potentially fascinating correlation.

As the old saying goes, "Why don't penguins like talking to strangers at parties? Because they find it hard to break the ice!" Similarly, researchers often find it challenging to break through the surface of unexpected statistical phenomena. Yet, armed with curiosity and a love for uncovering statistical oddities, we embarked on this study to investigate the relationship between paralegal employment in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica.'

Our foray into this unlikely association echoes the sentiment of a dad joke – it might elicit a groan at first, but the punchline lies in the unexpected connection that unfolds. We are not merely seeking to amuse with this investigation; rather, we aim to illuminate a peculiar trend and explore its implications with the seriousness of a courtroom drama.

The nexus between paralegals and penguins might seem as mismatched as wearing a tuxedo to a fishing trip, but our initial analysis has unearthed a statistically significant correlation that demands further examination. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for takeoff as we delve into this statistical safari, where we promise to approach the findings with the gravity of a legal brief and the joviality of a dad at a barbecue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the peculiar relationship between the number of paralegals in the state of Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Our research team embarked on this exploration with a healthy curiosity and a dose of humor, knowing that unravelling this enigma could lead to some unexpected findings, akin to stumbling upon a penguin in a courtroom.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 2004 to 2020. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01, indicating a surprisingly strong connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This relationship, much like a good dad joke, may initially elicit a chuckle of disbelief, yet it persists with its intriguing statistical significance.

We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this comical quirk of statistical patterns further, and possibly uncover the reasons behind this perplexing correlation, while keeping in mind that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to a wealth of knowledge, much like paralegals and penguin-loving travelers seeking flights to the southernmost continent.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, esteemed colleagues, and anyone who's ever wondered what paralegals and penguins have in common, welcome to the oddest statistical investigation you'll encounter this year. Imagine a scenario where legal professionals of Alabama and adventurous travelers with a penchant for Antarctic exploration intersect – it sounds like the setup for a joke, but our study aims to shed light on this potentially fascinating correlation.
As the old saying goes, "Why don't penguins like talking to strangers at parties? Because they find it hard to break the ice!" Similarly, researchers often find it challenging to break through the surface of unexpected statistical phenomena. Yet, armed with curiosity and a love for uncovering statistical oddities, we embarked on this study to investigate the relationship between paralegal employment in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica.'
Our foray into this unlikely association echoes the sentiment of a dad joke – it might elicit a groan at first, but the punchline lies in the unexpected connection that unfolds. We are not merely seeking to amuse with this investigation; rather, we aim to illuminate a peculiar trend and explore its implications with the seriousness of a courtroom drama.
The nexus between paralegals and penguins might seem as mismatched as wearing a tuxedo to a fishing trip, but our initial analysis has unearthed a statistically significant correlation that demands further examination. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for takeoff as we delve into this statistical safari, where we promise to approach the findings with the gravity of a legal brief and the joviality of a dad at a barbecue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The curious correlation between paralegal employment in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' has piqued the interest of researchers in various fields. Smith, in "Legal Eagles and Frozen Desires," explores the intersection of legal professions and travel preferences, shedding light on the hidden aspirations of legal practitioners for polar escapades. However, the true depth of this association transcends mere professional curiosity, venturing into the realms of whimsy, surprise, and dad-joke-inspired wonder.

As we dig deeper into the mystical connection between paralegals and penguins, we encounter a plethora of unexpected findings. Doe and Jones, in "Legal Logistics and Lonely Landscapes," provide empirical evidence supporting the notion that legal professionals harbor suppressed desires for Antarctic voyages, surfacing in their incidental yet consistent searches for flights to this frosty destination.

The literature on this subject matter, much like a comedian navigating a legal labyrinth, offers moments of serious contemplation interspersed with light-hearted amusement and mind-boggling mysteries. This blending of gravity and levity mirrors our approach as we unravel the complex web of links between legalese and the lure of Antarctica.

In an unlikely turn of events, the literature meanders into the realm of non-fiction books, with titles like "Penguinology: A Legal Study" and "Flight Fever: Legal Implications of Antarctic Adventures." These works, ostensibly writing about unrelated topics, unexpectedly shed light on the intersection of legal careers and travel aspirations, much like finding a penguin in the middle of the Alabama Supreme Court.

On the fictitious front, the inexplicable bond between paralegals and penguin enthusiasts is humorously echoed in books such as "The Legal Guide to Emperor Penguins" and "To Kill a Mockingbird...and Discover Penguins." While these titles may appear whimsical and far-fetched, their subtle allusions to the intriguing correlation between legal support staff and Antarctic exploration encapsulate the essence of our research.

Following this unexpected turn, our endeavor led us to explore television shows that, on the surface, seem unrelated to legal affairs or polar adventures. Surprisingly, series such as "Better Call Saulmon: A Legal Fish Out of Water" and "CSI: Antarctica – Crimes and Cold-Blooded Creatures" resonate with our investigation, weaving subtle threads of relevance amidst their seemingly disparate premises.

As we navigate through these diverse sources, it becomes evident that the connection between paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' is not just a statistical oddity but a testament to the whimsical and wondrous interplay of human interests. Just as a courtroom drama can take unexpected comedic turns, our exploration of this correlation promises to offer both scholarly insights and lighthearted revelations, much like a dad joke delivered in a high-stakes legal debate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the peculiar relationship between the number of paralegals in the state of Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Our research team embarked on this exploration with a healthy curiosity and a dose of humor, knowing that unravelling this enigma could lead to some unexpected findings, akin to stumbling upon a penguin in a courtroom.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 2004 to 2020. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01, indicating a surprisingly strong connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This relationship, much like a good dad joke, may initially elicit a chuckle of disbelief, yet it persists with its intriguing statistical significance.

We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this comical quirk of statistical patterns further, and possibly uncover the reasons behind this perplexing correlation, while keeping in mind that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to a wealth of knowledge, much like paralegals and penguin-loving travelers seeking flights to the southernmost continent.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, esteemed colleagues, and anyone who's ever wondered what paralegals and penguins have in common, welcome to the oddest statistical investigation you'll encounter this year. Imagine a scenario where legal professionals of Alabama and adventurous travelers with a penchant for Antarctic exploration intersect – it sounds like the setup for a joke, but our study aims to shed light on this potentially fascinating correlation.
As the old saying goes, "Why don't penguins like talking to strangers at parties? Because they find it hard to break the ice!" Similarly, researchers often find it challenging to break through the surface of unexpected statistical phenomena. Yet, armed with curiosity and a love for uncovering statistical oddities, we embarked on this study to investigate the relationship between paralegal employment in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica.'
Our foray into this unlikely association echoes the sentiment of a dad joke – it might elicit a groan at first, but the punchline lies in the unexpected connection that unfolds. We are not merely seeking to amuse with this investigation; rather, we aim to illuminate a peculiar trend and explore its implications with the seriousness of a courtroom drama.
The nexus between paralegals and penguins might seem as mismatched as wearing a tuxedo to a fishing trip, but our initial analysis has unearthed a statistically significant correlation that demands further examination. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for takeoff as we delve into this statistical safari, where we promise to approach the findings with the gravity of a legal brief and the joviality of a dad at a barbecue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To scrutinize the inexplicable link between paralegals in Alabama and the urge to travel to Antarctica, we embarked on a methodological journey as adventurous as a penguin navigating the icy seas. Our research team dived into the data like intrepid explorers, employing a combination of quantitative analysis and a touch of whimsical curiosity.

First, we compiled data on paralegal employment in Alabama from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, meticulously counting the legal foot soldiers marching through the state year by year with an eagle eye, or shall we say, a penguin's precision. We crafted graphs and charts with the diligence of a legal assistant preparing for a trial, presenting the fluctuating numbers of paralegals akin to the rise and fall of tides in the Antarctic.

Next, we turned to Google Trends, tracking the frequency of searches for 'flights to Antarctica' with the tenacity of a penguin hunting for its next meal. With each search query, we witnessed the ebb and flow of wanderlust for the Southern Continent, akin to the migration patterns of our tuxedo-clad friends. But instead of seeking fish, our subjects were in search of flights, seemingly propelled by the invisible currents of the internet.

To further understand this enigmatic connection, we employed statistical analyses that danced between correlation coefficients and regression models with the finesse of a penguin performing a mating dance. We applied rigorous tests to measure the strength and significance of the relationship between paralegals and Antarctic flights, all the while maintaining our sense of wonder at the surprising alliance between legal professionals and intrepid travelers.

Finally, we conducted a qualitative analysis of our findings, sifting through the data with the precision of penguins grooming their plumage, seeking patterns and insights that could offer a glimpse into the underlying factors driving this peculiar correlation. Just as penguins communicate through distinct calls, our data spoke to us, whispering tales of an unorthodox connection waiting to be unveiled.

In essence, our methodology may have traversed the terrain of statistical analysis, but our spirit remained akin to a penguin waddling through the snow – sober and steadfast, yet delightfully curious at the unexpected turns our investigation unveiled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9240203, r-squared of 0.8538136, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the peculiar relationship between the number of paralegals in the state of Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Our research team embarked on this exploration with a healthy curiosity and a dose of humor, knowing that unravelling this enigma could lead to some unexpected findings, akin to stumbling upon a penguin in a courtroom.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 2004 to 2020. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01, indicating a surprisingly strong connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This relationship, much like a good dad joke, may initially elicit a chuckle of disbelief, yet it persists with its intriguing statistical significance.

We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this comical quirk of statistical patterns further, and possibly uncover the reasons behind this perplexing correlation, while keeping in mind that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to a wealth of knowledge, much like paralegals and penguin-loving travelers seeking flights to the southernmost continent.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, esteemed colleagues, and anyone who's ever wondered what paralegals and penguins have in common, welcome to the oddest statistical investigation you'll encounter this year. Imagine a scenario where legal professionals of Alabama and adventurous travelers with a penchant for Antarctic exploration intersect – it sounds like the setup for a joke, but our study aims to shed light on this potentially fascinating correlation.
As the old saying goes, "Why don't penguins like talking to strangers at parties? Because they find it hard to break the ice!" Similarly, researchers often find it challenging to break through the surface of unexpected statistical phenomena. Yet, armed with curiosity and a love for uncovering statistical oddities, we embarked on this study to investigate the relationship between paralegal employment in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica.'
Our foray into this unlikely association echoes the sentiment of a dad joke – it might elicit a groan at first, but the punchline lies in the unexpected connection that unfolds. We are not merely seeking to amuse with this investigation; rather, we aim to illuminate a peculiar trend and explore its implications with the seriousness of a courtroom drama.
The nexus between paralegals and penguins might seem as mismatched as wearing a tuxedo to a fishing trip, but our initial analysis has unearthed a statistically significant correlation that demands further examination. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for takeoff as we delve into this statistical safari, where we promise to approach the findings with the gravity of a legal brief and the joviality of a dad at a barbecue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the number of paralegals employed in Alabama and the volume of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that as the number of paralegals in Alabama increased, so did the interest in flying to the land of ice.

Now, if we were to come up with a legal pun, we could say that this correlation is as solid as a rock in a courtroom, but we won't 'bill' you for that one!

The high r-squared value of 0.8538136 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship. This finding suggests that approximately 85% of the variability in Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' can be explained by the variation in the number of paralegals in Alabama. It's like the attorney presenting a compelling case – the evidence strongly points to a connection between these two variables.

In the words of a dad joke aficionado, "Why don't penguins like the Alabama heat? Because they prefer flights to Antarctica!" It seems our findings have uncovered a preference for cooler climates, albeit through the lens of Google searches and paralegals.

The significance level of p < 0.01 indicated that this relationship is unlikely to be a result of mere chance. It's as if the judge has ruled in favor of this unexpected correlation, and now it stands as a valid and statistically significant observation.

Figure 1 displays our findings in a scatterplot, visually representing the substantial connection between the number of paralegals in Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. The plot illustrates a clear pattern where an increase in paralegal employment is accompanied by a surge in interest in flights to the southernmost continent. It's like watching a legal case unfold – the evidence becomes more convincing with each observation.

In conclusion, our research not only unraveled a surprising statistical relationship but also introduced a novel dimension to the intersection of legal professions and distant travel aspirations. This unexpected correlation piqued our interest, and we hope it does the same for our readers – after all, who wouldn't be fascinated by the convergence of legal eagles and flights to penguin territory?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the peculiar relationship between the number of paralegals in the state of Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Our research team embarked on this exploration with a healthy curiosity and a dose of humor, knowing that unravelling this enigma could lead to some unexpected findings, akin to stumbling upon a penguin in a courtroom.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 2004 to 2020. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01, indicating a surprisingly strong connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This relationship, much like a good dad joke, may initially elicit a chuckle of disbelief, yet it persists with its intriguing statistical significance.

We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this comical quirk of statistical patterns further, and possibly uncover the reasons behind this perplexing correlation, while keeping in mind that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to a wealth of knowledge, much like paralegals and penguin-loving travelers seeking flights to the southernmost continent.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious correlation between paralegal employment in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' has piqued the interest of researchers in various fields. Smith, in "Legal Eagles and Frozen Desires," explores the intersection of legal professions and travel preferences, shedding light on the hidden aspirations of legal practitioners for polar escapades. However, the true depth of this association transcends mere professional curiosity, venturing into the realms of whimsy, surprise, and dad-joke-inspired wonder.
As we dig deeper into the mystical connection between paralegals and penguins, we encounter a plethora of unexpected findings. Doe and Jones, in "Legal Logistics and Lonely Landscapes," provide empirical evidence supporting the notion that legal professionals harbor suppressed desires for Antarctic voyages, surfacing in their incidental yet consistent searches for flights to this frosty destination.
The literature on this subject matter, much like a comedian navigating a legal labyrinth, offers moments of serious contemplation interspersed with light-hearted amusement and mind-boggling mysteries. This blending of gravity and levity mirrors our approach as we unravel the complex web of links between legalese and the lure of Antarctica.
In an unlikely turn of events, the literature meanders into the realm of non-fiction books, with titles like "Penguinology: A Legal Study" and "Flight Fever: Legal Implications of Antarctic Adventures." These works, ostensibly writing about unrelated topics, unexpectedly shed light on the intersection of legal careers and travel aspirations, much like finding a penguin in the middle of the Alabama Supreme Court.
On the fictitious front, the inexplicable bond between paralegals and penguin enthusiasts is humorously echoed in books such as "The Legal Guide to Emperor Penguins" and "To Kill a Mockingbird...and Discover Penguins." While these titles may appear whimsical and far-fetched, their subtle allusions to the intriguing correlation between legal support staff and Antarctic exploration encapsulate the essence of our research.
Following this unexpected turn, our endeavor led us to explore television shows that, on the surface, seem unrelated to legal affairs or polar adventures. Surprisingly, series such as "Better Call Saulmon: A Legal Fish Out of Water" and "CSI: Antarctica – Crimes and Cold-Blooded Creatures" resonate with our investigation, weaving subtle threads of relevance amidst their seemingly disparate premises.
As we navigate through these diverse sources, it becomes evident that the connection between paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' is not just a statistical oddity but a testament to the whimsical and wondrous interplay of human interests. Just as a courtroom drama can take unexpected comedic turns, our exploration of this correlation promises to offer both scholarly insights and lighthearted revelations, much like a dad joke delivered in a high-stakes legal debate.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the number of paralegals employed in Alabama and the volume of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that as the number of paralegals in Alabama increased, so did the interest in flying to the land of ice.
Now, if we were to come up with a legal pun, we could say that this correlation is as solid as a rock in a courtroom, but we won't 'bill' you for that one!
The high r-squared value of 0.8538136 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship. This finding suggests that approximately 85% of the variability in Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' can be explained by the variation in the number of paralegals in Alabama. It's like the attorney presenting a compelling case – the evidence strongly points to a connection between these two variables.
In the words of a dad joke aficionado, "Why don't penguins like the Alabama heat? Because they prefer flights to Antarctica!" It seems our findings have uncovered a preference for cooler climates, albeit through the lens of Google searches and paralegals.
The significance level of p < 0.01 indicated that this relationship is unlikely to be a result of mere chance. It's as if the judge has ruled in favor of this unexpected correlation, and now it stands as a valid and statistically significant observation.
Figure 1 displays our findings in a scatterplot, visually representing the substantial connection between the number of paralegals in Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. The plot illustrates a clear pattern where an increase in paralegal employment is accompanied by a surge in interest in flights to the southernmost continent. It's like watching a legal case unfold – the evidence becomes more convincing with each observation.
In conclusion, our research not only unraveled a surprising statistical relationship but also introduced a novel dimension to the intersection of legal professions and distant travel aspirations. This unexpected correlation piqued our interest, and we hope it does the same for our readers – after all, who wouldn't be fascinated by the convergence of legal eagles and flights to penguin territory?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings offer valuable insight into the unexpected and humorous relationship between paralegal employment in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. The statistically significant connection we uncovered further corroborates the previous research, which, much like navigating a legal maze, revealed curious and amusing tidbits about legal professionals' hidden fascinations with Antarctic journeys.

In our examination of the literature review, we encountered various studies and sources that humorously explored the concealed desires of legal practitioners for polar escapades. As we dove into our own analysis, we found that the correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 indeed reaffirmed the surprising strength of the link between paralegals and penguin-seeking internet users. It's as if these variables were engaged in a jocular legal banter, each playing a part in the comic courtroom drama of statistical significance.

The robustness of our results, highlighted by the high r-squared value of 0.8538136, aligns with the lighthearted musings of previous researchers and the whimsical titles of imaginary books that unexpectedly shed light on the legal world's fascination with Antarctic adventures. As we ponder the strength of this correlation, one cannot help but appreciate the sheer bizarreness of the statistical world, where courtroom dramas and dad jokes meld into a revealing portrait of human interests.

Our investigation reinforces the notion that this unexpected correlation is not a fluke – much like a penguin's dislike for Alabama heat, there seems to be a genuine preference for flights to Antarctica that resonates with the paralegal community. Our significant finding, akin to a court ruling in favor of an unexpected argument, emphasizes the validity and meaningfulness of this connection. It's a reminder that beneath the seriousness of statistical analyses lies a world of whimsy and surprise, much like a dad joke unexpectedly crammed into a legal document.

In conclusion, our study unfolds like a legal case with unexpected comedic elements, offering a blend of scholarly insights and lighthearted revelations. We urge future researchers to delve into this comical quirk of statistical patterns and explore the reasons behind this peculiar correlation. After all, who wouldn't appreciate the convergence of legal eagles and flights to penguin territory, especially when it comes with a side of statistical significance and dad jokes galore?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paralegals in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the peculiar relationship between the number of paralegals in the state of Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Our research team embarked on this exploration with a healthy curiosity and a dose of humor, knowing that unravelling this enigma could lead to some unexpected findings, akin to stumbling upon a penguin in a courtroom.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 2004 to 2020. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01, indicating a surprisingly strong connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This relationship, much like a good dad joke, may initially elicit a chuckle of disbelief, yet it persists with its intriguing statistical significance.

We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this comical quirk of statistical patterns further, and possibly uncover the reasons behind this perplexing correlation, while keeping in mind that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to a wealth of knowledge, much like paralegals and penguin-loving travelers seeking flights to the southernmost continent.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, esteemed colleagues, and anyone who's ever wondered what paralegals and penguins have in common, welcome to the oddest statistical investigation you'll encounter this year. Imagine a scenario where legal professionals of Alabama and adventurous travelers with a penchant for Antarctic exploration intersect – it sounds like the setup for a joke, but our study aims to shed light on this potentially fascinating correlation.
As the old saying goes, "Why don't penguins like talking to strangers at parties? Because they find it hard to break the ice!" Similarly, researchers often find it challenging to break through the surface of unexpected statistical phenomena. Yet, armed with curiosity and a love for uncovering statistical oddities, we embarked on this study to investigate the relationship between paralegal employment in Alabama and Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica.'
Our foray into this unlikely association echoes the sentiment of a dad joke – it might elicit a groan at first, but the punchline lies in the unexpected connection that unfolds. We are not merely seeking to amuse with this investigation; rather, we aim to illuminate a peculiar trend and explore its implications with the seriousness of a courtroom drama.
The nexus between paralegals and penguins might seem as mismatched as wearing a tuxedo to a fishing trip, but our initial analysis has unearthed a statistically significant correlation that demands further examination. So, fasten your seat belts and prepare for takeoff as we delve into this statistical safari, where we promise to approach the findings with the gravity of a legal brief and the joviality of a dad at a barbecue.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the number of paralegals employed in Alabama and the volume of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that as the number of paralegals in Alabama increased, so did the interest in flying to the land of ice.
Now, if we were to come up with a legal pun, we could say that this correlation is as solid as a rock in a courtroom, but we won't 'bill' you for that one!
The high r-squared value of 0.8538136 further emphasized the robustness of this relationship. This finding suggests that approximately 85% of the variability in Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' can be explained by the variation in the number of paralegals in Alabama. It's like the attorney presenting a compelling case – the evidence strongly points to a connection between these two variables.
In the words of a dad joke aficionado, "Why don't penguins like the Alabama heat? Because they prefer flights to Antarctica!" It seems our findings have uncovered a preference for cooler climates, albeit through the lens of Google searches and paralegals.
The significance level of p < 0.01 indicated that this relationship is unlikely to be a result of mere chance. It's as if the judge has ruled in favor of this unexpected correlation, and now it stands as a valid and statistically significant observation.
Figure 1 displays our findings in a scatterplot, visually representing the substantial connection between the number of paralegals in Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. The plot illustrates a clear pattern where an increase in paralegal employment is accompanied by a surge in interest in flights to the southernmost continent. It's like watching a legal case unfold – the evidence becomes more convincing with each observation.
In conclusion, our research not only unraveled a surprising statistical relationship but also introduced a novel dimension to the intersection of legal professions and distant travel aspirations. This unexpected correlation piqued our interest, and we hope it does the same for our readers – after all, who wouldn't be fascinated by the convergence of legal eagles and flights to penguin territory?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our study has uncovered a remarkably strong and intriguing correlation between the number of paralegals employed in Alabama and the volume of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. It appears that just as legal proceedings in the courtroom fluctuate, so do the aspirations of potential travelers towards the frozen continent. This unexpected connection, much like a clever legal loophole, has opened doors to a new avenue of inquiry that pairs the world of law with the allure of Antarctic adventure.

As we conclude our investigation, it's important to remember that correlation does not imply causation – just like how a good lawyer doesn't always guarantee a win in court. However, the statistical significance and robustness of this relationship cannot be dismissed, much like a dad joke that keeps resurfacing at family gatherings.

Our findings have showcased a correlation as substantial as the weight of an iceberg, yet we must caution against inferring a direct causal link between these two variables. As the legal adage goes, "It's not over until the fat lady sings," but in this case, it seems the penguins may be the ones singing their icy tunes in Alabama.

We believe this statistical oddity, like a good dad joke, holds entertainment value while also prompting further inquiry. However, with a correlation as compelling as a courtroom testimony, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. It seems that, much like a penguin in a courtroom, this statistical phenomenon will forever remain a delightful enigma for the ages.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Unconventional Research (SAUR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Paralegals to Penguins: Investigating the Relationship Between Paralegal Employment in Alabama and Google Searches for 'Flights to Antarctica' with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the peculiar relationship between the number of paralegals in the state of Alabama and the frequency of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'. Our research team embarked on this exploration with a healthy curiosity and a dose of humor, knowing that unravelling this enigma could lead to some unexpected findings, akin to stumbling upon a penguin in a courtroom.
Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the years 2004 to 2020. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9240203 and p < 0.01, indicating a surprisingly strong connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. This relationship, much like a good dad joke, may initially elicit a chuckle of disbelief, yet it persists with its intriguing statistical significance.
We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this comical quirk of statistical patterns further, and possibly uncover the reasons behind this perplexing correlation, while keeping in mind that sometimes, the most unexpected pairings can lead to a wealth of knowledge, much like paralegals and penguin-loving travelers seeking flights to the southernmost continent.

ChatGPT:

paralegals, employment, Alabama, Google searches, flights to Antarctica, correlation, statistical analysis, data analysis, unusual relationships, unexpected findings, research, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, statistical significance, statistical patterns, penguins, travelers

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of paralegals in Alabama
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of paralegals and legal assistants in Alabama
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of paralegals in Alabama

Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'

Correlation r = 0.9240203 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8538136 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of paralegals in Alabama) over the 17 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-7. 0.0000001184406456828048300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.2E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,443,048 random variables You don't actually need 8 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
The number of paralegals in Alabama (Laborers)18501890248026302350232029502800223028602870301030003780413036803770
Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' (Rel. search volume)11.16677.8333319.916713.083316.083313.7517.416715.583318.2518.666717.833322.2525.166731.535.416734.2528.4167




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1850,1890,2480,2630,2350,2320,2950,2800,2230,2860,2870,3010,3000,3780,4130,3680,3770,])
array_2 = np.array([11.1667,7.83333,19.9167,13.0833,16.0833,13.75,17.4167,15.5833,18.25,18.6667,17.8333,22.25,25.1667,31.5,35.4167,34.25,28.4167,])
array_1_name = "The number of paralegals in Alabama"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1820 · Black Variable ID: 4480 · Red Variable ID: 1373
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0