about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,766 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Well, with more transportation inspectors in Montana, there's a higher demand for inspections overall. This has led to a shortage of qualified inspectors in other areas. As a result, Congo-Brazzaville has seen an influx of jet fuel shipments that are now going uninspected, because all the inspectors are being drawn to Montana. It's a classic case of fueling the inspector job market, and the skies of Congo-Brazzaville are bearing the brunt of it!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ inspired by bauhaus ] Generate an image of a futuristic transportation hub, with sleek geometric structures and bold primary colors, reminiscent of the bauhaus style. In the foreground, depict a team of transportation inspectors diligently reviewing maintenance records of various vehicles at a bustling truck stop. Meanwhile, in the background, showcase a group of workers refueling a large commercial airplane with jet fuel on the tarmac, capturing the simultaneous activities in a visually captivating manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave Steampunk inspired by bauhaus 3D Pixar Style Celtic art
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small Montana town, a team of transportation inspectors are busy checking the maintenance records of local vehicles at a bustling truck stop. Across the world in Congo-Brazzaville, a large commercial airplane is being refueled with jet fuel by a group of workers on the tarmac.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In a small Montana town, a team of transportation inspectors are busy checking the maintenance records of local vehicles at a bustling truck stop. Across the world in Congo-Brazzaville, a large commercial airplane is being refueled with jet fuel by a group of workers on the tarmac. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ inspired by bauhaus ] Generate an image of a futuristic transportation hub, with sleek geometric structures and bold primary colors, reminiscent of the bauhaus style. In the foreground, depict a team of transportation inspectors diligently reviewing maintenance records of various vehicles at a bustling truck stop. Meanwhile, in the background, showcase a group of workers refueling a large commercial airplane with jet fuel on the tarmac, capturing the simultaneous activities in a visually captivating manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of transportation inspectors in Montana caused Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville

The International Journal of Eclectic Transportation Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of transportation, the connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville has been a subject of mystery and speculation. This research delves into the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, aiming to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our study analyzed the trends from 2003 to 2021. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, indicating a strong association between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between transportation oversight in the remote expanses of Montana and aviation fuel consumption in the heart of Africa, but also underscore the interconnectedness of global transportation systems. This study is a testament to the surprising and whimsical nature of academic research, where even the most unusual pairings can unveil meaningful insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of transportation, the connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville has been a subject of mystery and speculation. This research delves into the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, aiming to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our study analyzed the trends from 2003 to 2021. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, indicating a strong association between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between transportation oversight in the remote expanses of Montana and aviation fuel consumption in the heart of Africa, but also underscore the interconnectedness of global transportation systems. This study is a testament to the surprising and whimsical nature of academic research, where even the most unusual pairings can unveil meaningful insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The world of transportation is filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding a lost sock in the dryer or discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly delicious sandwich. In this vein, our research dives headfirst into the puzzling relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in the charmingly vast state of Montana and the jet fuel consumption habits of our friends in Congo-Brazzaville. While this may seem as unlikely a pair as mismatched socks, our study aims to unravel the mysterious bond between these seemingly disparate variables and shed light on the whimsical intricacies of the global transportation network.

Some may ask, "Why Montana?" Well, outside of being home to breathtaking natural landscapes and a disproportionate number of cows, the state of Montana plays a crucial role in overseeing transportation systems, including the inspection of vehicles, equipment, and, yes, perhaps even the occasional flying saucer. On the other side of the globe, Congo-Brazzaville boasts a thriving aviation industry, where jet fuel is as essential as a bottomless cup of coffee on a Monday morning. Both locations, though vastly different, share a common thread in the intricate web of transportation, much like finding out that your favorite pizza joint and the laundromat have the same pizza delivery guy.

As we traverse the landscape of academic research, we are often greeted with the unexpected, the peculiar, and the downright inexplicable – much like finding a misplaced banana in the cutlery drawer. Yet, it is precisely these instances that enrich our understanding of the world around us and provide a dash of humor in an otherwise serious pursuit. Our study aims to not only uncover the uncanny association between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville but also to celebrate the enchanting unpredictability of the research process.

So, join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the peculiar link between transportation inspectors and jet-set fuel consumption, proving that in the complex realm of academic exploration, even the most unusual pairings can provide not only insight but also a delightful surprise akin to finding a hidden treasure in your grandmother's attic.

[Note to self: potential image caption – "Connecting the Dots: Unraveling the Quirky Bond between Inspectors and Jet Fuel"]


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of transportation, the connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville has been a subject of mystery and speculation. This research delves into the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, aiming to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our study analyzed the trends from 2003 to 2021. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, indicating a strong association between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between transportation oversight in the remote expanses of Montana and aviation fuel consumption in the heart of Africa, but also underscore the interconnectedness of global transportation systems. This study is a testament to the surprising and whimsical nature of academic research, where even the most unusual pairings can unveil meaningful insights.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of transportation is filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding a lost sock in the dryer or discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly delicious sandwich. In this vein, our research dives headfirst into the puzzling relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in the charmingly vast state of Montana and the jet fuel consumption habits of our friends in Congo-Brazzaville. While this may seem as unlikely a pair as mismatched socks, our study aims to unravel the mysterious bond between these seemingly disparate variables and shed light on the whimsical intricacies of the global transportation network.
Some may ask, "Why Montana?" Well, outside of being home to breathtaking natural landscapes and a disproportionate number of cows, the state of Montana plays a crucial role in overseeing transportation systems, including the inspection of vehicles, equipment, and, yes, perhaps even the occasional flying saucer. On the other side of the globe, Congo-Brazzaville boasts a thriving aviation industry, where jet fuel is as essential as a bottomless cup of coffee on a Monday morning. Both locations, though vastly different, share a common thread in the intricate web of transportation, much like finding out that your favorite pizza joint and the laundromat have the same pizza delivery guy.
As we traverse the landscape of academic research, we are often greeted with the unexpected, the peculiar, and the downright inexplicable – much like finding a misplaced banana in the cutlery drawer. Yet, it is precisely these instances that enrich our understanding of the world around us and provide a dash of humor in an otherwise serious pursuit. Our study aims to not only uncover the uncanny association between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville but also to celebrate the enchanting unpredictability of the research process.
So, join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the peculiar link between transportation inspectors and jet-set fuel consumption, proving that in the complex realm of academic exploration, even the most unusual pairings can provide not only insight but also a delightful surprise akin to finding a hidden treasure in your grandmother's attic.
[Note to self: potential image caption – "Connecting the Dots: Unraveling the Quirky Bond between Inspectors and Jet Fuel"]

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
LITERATURE REVIEW

The relationship between transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville might sound as far-fetched as a penguin in the Sahara, but our investigation into this whimsical connection has uncovered a surprisingly robust body of literature, teeming with scholarly insights and, dare I say, a sprinkle of amusement.

Smith et al. (2017) delve into the nuanced world of transportation oversight, emphasizing the critical role of inspectors in maintaining safety standards across diverse modes of transport. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2019) offer a comprehensive analysis of jet fuel consumption patterns in developing economies, laying bare the intricate web of factors that influence fuel usage in the aviation sector.

Moving into the realm of non-fiction, "The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us" by Chabris and Simons (2010) presents a captivating exploration of human perception and the tendency to overlook unexpected connections—much like the conspicuous link between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville. As we wade further into the pool of literature, "The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference" by Malcolm Gladwell (2002) offers a thought-provoking reflection on the ripple effects of seemingly inconsequential occurrences, leaving us to wonder if perhaps the number of transportation inspectors in Montana might hold more sway over global jet fuel consumption than previously presumed.

Shifting gears into the world of make-believe, the classic "Around the World in Eighty Days" by Jules Verne (1873) takes us on a whimsical adventure across continents, akin to the meandering journey of our research into the tangled threads of transportation oversight and jet fuel utilization. Furthermore, the allure of mystery and unexpected connections is palpable in Agatha Christie's "Murder on the Orient Express" (1934), where seemingly disconnected events interweave to form an intricate tapestry of clues and revelations—not unlike the enigmatic bond between transportation inspectors and jet fuel consumption.

Drawing inspiration from the realm of board games, the unpredictability of "Snakes and Ladders" seems to encapsulate the serpentine path of our investigation. Just when we think we're making progress toward unraveling the correlation between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel usage in Congo-Brazzaville, a metaphorical snake sends us sliding back a few steps. However, much like the thrill of reaching the top of the ladder in the game, uncovering the underlying connection between these variables promises a euphoric sense of achievement and perhaps a dash of puzzled amusement.

In a world filled with unexpected twists, improbable connections, and the occasional misplaced banana, our literature review serves as a testament to the curious and amusing nature of academic inquiry, where the most unlikely pairings can hold profound implications and, of course, a hint of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of transportation, the connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville has been a subject of mystery and speculation. This research delves into the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, aiming to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our study analyzed the trends from 2003 to 2021. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, indicating a strong association between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between transportation oversight in the remote expanses of Montana and aviation fuel consumption in the heart of Africa, but also underscore the interconnectedness of global transportation systems. This study is a testament to the surprising and whimsical nature of academic research, where even the most unusual pairings can unveil meaningful insights.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of transportation is filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding a lost sock in the dryer or discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly delicious sandwich. In this vein, our research dives headfirst into the puzzling relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in the charmingly vast state of Montana and the jet fuel consumption habits of our friends in Congo-Brazzaville. While this may seem as unlikely a pair as mismatched socks, our study aims to unravel the mysterious bond between these seemingly disparate variables and shed light on the whimsical intricacies of the global transportation network.
Some may ask, "Why Montana?" Well, outside of being home to breathtaking natural landscapes and a disproportionate number of cows, the state of Montana plays a crucial role in overseeing transportation systems, including the inspection of vehicles, equipment, and, yes, perhaps even the occasional flying saucer. On the other side of the globe, Congo-Brazzaville boasts a thriving aviation industry, where jet fuel is as essential as a bottomless cup of coffee on a Monday morning. Both locations, though vastly different, share a common thread in the intricate web of transportation, much like finding out that your favorite pizza joint and the laundromat have the same pizza delivery guy.
As we traverse the landscape of academic research, we are often greeted with the unexpected, the peculiar, and the downright inexplicable – much like finding a misplaced banana in the cutlery drawer. Yet, it is precisely these instances that enrich our understanding of the world around us and provide a dash of humor in an otherwise serious pursuit. Our study aims to not only uncover the uncanny association between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville but also to celebrate the enchanting unpredictability of the research process.
So, join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the peculiar link between transportation inspectors and jet-set fuel consumption, proving that in the complex realm of academic exploration, even the most unusual pairings can provide not only insight but also a delightful surprise akin to finding a hidden treasure in your grandmother's attic.
[Note to self: potential image caption – "Connecting the Dots: Unraveling the Quirky Bond between Inspectors and Jet Fuel"]

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and the jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville, our research team embarked on a data collection journey that rivaled a scavenger hunt with cryptic clues. We scoured the depths of the internet, navigating through the digital jungle like intrepid explorers on a quest for the holy grail of transportation data. Our primary sources of information were the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, where we sifted through a plethora of datasets, much like panning for gold in a river of statistical information.

With the precision of a watchmaker and the patience of a saint, we meticulously gathered data spanning from 2003 to 2021, encompassing an expansive timeline that would make even the most seasoned historian nod in approval. We diligently cataloged the number of transportation inspectors in Montana, keeping an eye out for any lurking anomalies that might attempt to disrupt our research like unexpected plot twists in a mystery novel. Simultaneously, we delved into the depths of jet fuel consumption data in Congo-Brazzaville, navigating through a labyrinth of numbers and figures with the determination of an intrepid soul aiming to conquer a formidable puzzle.

Our data analysis techniques were as diverse as a box of crayons: we employed comprehensive statistical methods, including regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and resampling permutations, to paint a vivid picture of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Like a skilled conductor leading a harmonious orchestra, we orchestrated our data with precision, ensuring that each note played a meaningful role in composing the grand symphony of our findings.

Through rigorous statistical computations and a series of systematic tests, we aimed to excavate the buried treasure of correlation between these two distinct factors, much like unearthing a long-lost relic in the annals of history. Our analysis was conducted with a level of scrutiny that rivaled a forensic investigation, leaving no stone unturned in our pursuit of the elusive link between transportation oversight and jet fuel consumption.

In the end, what emerged was not merely a numerical relationship, but an intriguing tale of interconnectedness that transcended geographical boundaries and defied conventional expectations. Our methodology, though laced with elements of whimsy and humor, encapsulated the rigorous nature of academic inquiry, proving that even the most peculiar pairings can hold profound significance in the grand tapestry of research.

So, with our metaphorical magnifying glasses in hand and a spirit of scholarly adventure, we ventured into the intriguing realm of data analysis, uncovering the unexpected bond between transportation inspectors in Montana and the jet-set world of fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville. And as we present our findings, we invite the academic community to join us in unraveling the mysteries of the transportation universe, one quirky connection at a time.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8873725, r-squared of 0.7874299, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of transportation, the connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville has been a subject of mystery and speculation. This research delves into the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, aiming to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our study analyzed the trends from 2003 to 2021. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, indicating a strong association between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between transportation oversight in the remote expanses of Montana and aviation fuel consumption in the heart of Africa, but also underscore the interconnectedness of global transportation systems. This study is a testament to the surprising and whimsical nature of academic research, where even the most unusual pairings can unveil meaningful insights.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of transportation is filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding a lost sock in the dryer or discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly delicious sandwich. In this vein, our research dives headfirst into the puzzling relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in the charmingly vast state of Montana and the jet fuel consumption habits of our friends in Congo-Brazzaville. While this may seem as unlikely a pair as mismatched socks, our study aims to unravel the mysterious bond between these seemingly disparate variables and shed light on the whimsical intricacies of the global transportation network.
Some may ask, "Why Montana?" Well, outside of being home to breathtaking natural landscapes and a disproportionate number of cows, the state of Montana plays a crucial role in overseeing transportation systems, including the inspection of vehicles, equipment, and, yes, perhaps even the occasional flying saucer. On the other side of the globe, Congo-Brazzaville boasts a thriving aviation industry, where jet fuel is as essential as a bottomless cup of coffee on a Monday morning. Both locations, though vastly different, share a common thread in the intricate web of transportation, much like finding out that your favorite pizza joint and the laundromat have the same pizza delivery guy.
As we traverse the landscape of academic research, we are often greeted with the unexpected, the peculiar, and the downright inexplicable – much like finding a misplaced banana in the cutlery drawer. Yet, it is precisely these instances that enrich our understanding of the world around us and provide a dash of humor in an otherwise serious pursuit. Our study aims to not only uncover the uncanny association between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville but also to celebrate the enchanting unpredictability of the research process.
So, join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the peculiar link between transportation inspectors and jet-set fuel consumption, proving that in the complex realm of academic exploration, even the most unusual pairings can provide not only insight but also a delightful surprise akin to finding a hidden treasure in your grandmother's attic.
[Note to self: potential image caption – "Connecting the Dots: Unraveling the Quirky Bond between Inspectors and Jet Fuel"]

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8873725 indicates a robust positive association between these two variables, akin to the reliable link between fries and ketchup, or between a weary traveler and a decent cup of coffee. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further emphasized the substantial degree of shared variance, standing at a commendable 0.7874299. This high r-squared value suggests that approximately 78.74% of the variation in jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville can be explained by the number of transportation inspectors in Montana. In other words, this relationship is as clear as a GPS signal on a cloudless day.

In examining the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points reveal a strikingly linear pattern, akin to a swooping flight path of a migrating bird or the arc of a frisbee tossed in an open field. Each data point, much like unique pieces of a puzzle, contributed to the compelling narrative of the interconnectedness between transportation oversight in a rugged American state and aviation fuel consumption in a Central African nation.

The significance of our findings is further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, denoting an exceptionally low probability that such a strong correlation could occur by chance alone. This result is as convincing as a well-documented alibi or a perfectly timed punchline. Therefore, our study provides compelling evidence of a tangible and meaningful relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville.

In summary, the unexpected connection we uncovered is a testament to the delightful surprises that academic research can unveil, reminiscent of discovering a twenty-dollar bill in the pocket of an old coat. Furthermore, these findings emphasize the intricate and often whimsical nature of the global transportation network, highlighting that even the most unlikely pairings can harbor meaningful insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of transportation, the connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville has been a subject of mystery and speculation. This research delves into the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, aiming to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our study analyzed the trends from 2003 to 2021. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, indicating a strong association between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between transportation oversight in the remote expanses of Montana and aviation fuel consumption in the heart of Africa, but also underscore the interconnectedness of global transportation systems. This study is a testament to the surprising and whimsical nature of academic research, where even the most unusual pairings can unveil meaningful insights.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
LITERATURE REVIEW
The relationship between transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville might sound as far-fetched as a penguin in the Sahara, but our investigation into this whimsical connection has uncovered a surprisingly robust body of literature, teeming with scholarly insights and, dare I say, a sprinkle of amusement.
Smith et al. (2017) delve into the nuanced world of transportation oversight, emphasizing the critical role of inspectors in maintaining safety standards across diverse modes of transport. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2019) offer a comprehensive analysis of jet fuel consumption patterns in developing economies, laying bare the intricate web of factors that influence fuel usage in the aviation sector.
Moving into the realm of non-fiction, "The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us" by Chabris and Simons (2010) presents a captivating exploration of human perception and the tendency to overlook unexpected connections—much like the conspicuous link between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville. As we wade further into the pool of literature, "The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference" by Malcolm Gladwell (2002) offers a thought-provoking reflection on the ripple effects of seemingly inconsequential occurrences, leaving us to wonder if perhaps the number of transportation inspectors in Montana might hold more sway over global jet fuel consumption than previously presumed.
Shifting gears into the world of make-believe, the classic "Around the World in Eighty Days" by Jules Verne (1873) takes us on a whimsical adventure across continents, akin to the meandering journey of our research into the tangled threads of transportation oversight and jet fuel utilization. Furthermore, the allure of mystery and unexpected connections is palpable in Agatha Christie's "Murder on the Orient Express" (1934), where seemingly disconnected events interweave to form an intricate tapestry of clues and revelations—not unlike the enigmatic bond between transportation inspectors and jet fuel consumption.
Drawing inspiration from the realm of board games, the unpredictability of "Snakes and Ladders" seems to encapsulate the serpentine path of our investigation. Just when we think we're making progress toward unraveling the correlation between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel usage in Congo-Brazzaville, a metaphorical snake sends us sliding back a few steps. However, much like the thrill of reaching the top of the ladder in the game, uncovering the underlying connection between these variables promises a euphoric sense of achievement and perhaps a dash of puzzled amusement.
In a world filled with unexpected twists, improbable connections, and the occasional misplaced banana, our literature review serves as a testament to the curious and amusing nature of academic inquiry, where the most unlikely pairings can hold profound implications and, of course, a hint of whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8873725 indicates a robust positive association between these two variables, akin to the reliable link between fries and ketchup, or between a weary traveler and a decent cup of coffee. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further emphasized the substantial degree of shared variance, standing at a commendable 0.7874299. This high r-squared value suggests that approximately 78.74% of the variation in jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville can be explained by the number of transportation inspectors in Montana. In other words, this relationship is as clear as a GPS signal on a cloudless day.
In examining the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points reveal a strikingly linear pattern, akin to a swooping flight path of a migrating bird or the arc of a frisbee tossed in an open field. Each data point, much like unique pieces of a puzzle, contributed to the compelling narrative of the interconnectedness between transportation oversight in a rugged American state and aviation fuel consumption in a Central African nation.
The significance of our findings is further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, denoting an exceptionally low probability that such a strong correlation could occur by chance alone. This result is as convincing as a well-documented alibi or a perfectly timed punchline. Therefore, our study provides compelling evidence of a tangible and meaningful relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville.
In summary, the unexpected connection we uncovered is a testament to the delightful surprises that academic research can unveil, reminiscent of discovering a twenty-dollar bill in the pocket of an old coat. Furthermore, these findings emphasize the intricate and often whimsical nature of the global transportation network, highlighting that even the most unlikely pairings can harbor meaningful insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel usage in Congo-Brazzaville may seem as trendy as a penguin in the Sahara, yet our results echo the prior literature's unexpected insights. Smith et al. (2017) emphasized the pivotal role of transport inspectors in upholding safety standards—a role that seems to resonate across continents, as evidenced by our study's robust correlation coefficient of 0.8873725. Doe and Jones (2019) shed light on the complex web of factors influencing jet fuel consumption in developing economies, serving as a fitting companion to our findings, which unmasked the substantial association between transportation oversight and aviation fuel usage. Even Chabris and Simons (2010) would be intrigued by this inherent human tendency to overlook seemingly implausible connections, as our results emphasize the profound relationship between seemingly unrelated variables.

The striking correlation coefficient and the high coefficient of determination in our study support the prior literature's suggestions that the number of transportation inspectors in Montana might indeed hold sway over global jet fuel consumption. Our findings are as solid as a well-anchored jet bridge and demonstrate a convincing linkage between these two seemingly unrelated variables, reinforcing the whimsical nature of academic research where even the most improbable pairings can reveal meaningful insights.

The linear pattern observed in the scatterplot further epitomizes the compelling narrative that stems from this curious relationship. It's reminiscent of a migrating bird's flight path, echoing the interconnectedness between seemingly distant entities – much like the amiable association between a hotdog and its trusty mustard. The exceptionally low p-value only acts as further affirmation, akin to a reliable flashlight guiding us through the labyrinth of statistical probabilities. Consequently, our study offers compelling evidence supporting the existence of a tangible and meaningful connection between transportation oversight and jet fuel consumption, proving that academic research can yield delightful surprises and meaningful correlations.

Much like a detective unraveling a vexing case, our research has peeled back the layers of this intriguing puzzle, culminating in a most unexpected yet significant revelation. This quirly relationship between transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville stands as a testament to the captivating and, at times, amusing nature of academic inquiry, where the most unlikely of pairings can offer substantial contributions to our understanding of the world around us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Montana and Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the world of transportation, the connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville has been a subject of mystery and speculation. This research delves into the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, aiming to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our study analyzed the trends from 2003 to 2021. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, indicating a strong association between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between transportation oversight in the remote expanses of Montana and aviation fuel consumption in the heart of Africa, but also underscore the interconnectedness of global transportation systems. This study is a testament to the surprising and whimsical nature of academic research, where even the most unusual pairings can unveil meaningful insights.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The world of transportation is filled with unexpected connections and surprising correlations, much like finding a lost sock in the dryer or discovering that peanut butter and pickles make a surprisingly delicious sandwich. In this vein, our research dives headfirst into the puzzling relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in the charmingly vast state of Montana and the jet fuel consumption habits of our friends in Congo-Brazzaville. While this may seem as unlikely a pair as mismatched socks, our study aims to unravel the mysterious bond between these seemingly disparate variables and shed light on the whimsical intricacies of the global transportation network.
Some may ask, "Why Montana?" Well, outside of being home to breathtaking natural landscapes and a disproportionate number of cows, the state of Montana plays a crucial role in overseeing transportation systems, including the inspection of vehicles, equipment, and, yes, perhaps even the occasional flying saucer. On the other side of the globe, Congo-Brazzaville boasts a thriving aviation industry, where jet fuel is as essential as a bottomless cup of coffee on a Monday morning. Both locations, though vastly different, share a common thread in the intricate web of transportation, much like finding out that your favorite pizza joint and the laundromat have the same pizza delivery guy.
As we traverse the landscape of academic research, we are often greeted with the unexpected, the peculiar, and the downright inexplicable – much like finding a misplaced banana in the cutlery drawer. Yet, it is precisely these instances that enrich our understanding of the world around us and provide a dash of humor in an otherwise serious pursuit. Our study aims to not only uncover the uncanny association between transportation oversight in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville but also to celebrate the enchanting unpredictability of the research process.
So, join us on this whimsical journey as we unravel the peculiar link between transportation inspectors and jet-set fuel consumption, proving that in the complex realm of academic exploration, even the most unusual pairings can provide not only insight but also a delightful surprise akin to finding a hidden treasure in your grandmother's attic.
[Note to self: potential image caption – "Connecting the Dots: Unraveling the Quirky Bond between Inspectors and Jet Fuel"]

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8873725 indicates a robust positive association between these two variables, akin to the reliable link between fries and ketchup, or between a weary traveler and a decent cup of coffee. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further emphasized the substantial degree of shared variance, standing at a commendable 0.7874299. This high r-squared value suggests that approximately 78.74% of the variation in jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville can be explained by the number of transportation inspectors in Montana. In other words, this relationship is as clear as a GPS signal on a cloudless day.
In examining the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the data points reveal a strikingly linear pattern, akin to a swooping flight path of a migrating bird or the arc of a frisbee tossed in an open field. Each data point, much like unique pieces of a puzzle, contributed to the compelling narrative of the interconnectedness between transportation oversight in a rugged American state and aviation fuel consumption in a Central African nation.
The significance of our findings is further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, denoting an exceptionally low probability that such a strong correlation could occur by chance alone. This result is as convincing as a well-documented alibi or a perfectly timed punchline. Therefore, our study provides compelling evidence of a tangible and meaningful relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville.
In summary, the unexpected connection we uncovered is a testament to the delightful surprises that academic research can unveil, reminiscent of discovering a twenty-dollar bill in the pocket of an old coat. Furthermore, these findings emphasize the intricate and often whimsical nature of the global transportation network, highlighting that even the most unlikely pairings can harbor meaningful insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a remarkable and robust association between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville. The correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 between these seemingly disparate variables is as clear as the skid marks on a freshly-paved road. As surprising as finding a rubber chicken in your mailbox, our findings highlight the whimsical interconnectedness of global transportation systems.

The significance of this correlation, exemplified by the p-value of less than 0.01, is as convincing as a magic trick performed by a statistics-savvy rabbit. Our analysis emphasizes that approximately 78.74% of the variation in jet fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville can be explained by the number of transportation inspectors in Montana, a connection as tangible as the bond between a paperclip and a magnet.

Our whimsical journey into the world of transportation has not only unraveled the unlikely pair of inspectors and jet fuel but also demonstrated the delightful surprises that academic research can unveil. Therefore, we assert, with all seriousness and a touch of levity, that no further research is needed in this curious domain. Much like a well-delivered punchline, the connection between transportation oversight in Montana and aviation fuel consumption in Congo-Brazzaville stands as a testament to the unexpected and whimsical wonders of academic exploration.

In the words of the great Mark Twain, "The reports of the death of curiosity have been greatly exaggerated." And so, we bid ado to this charmingly peculiar investigation, confident that our findings will inspire further academic merriment and discovery.

[Note to self: potential image caption – "The Journey Ends: A Whimsical Farewell to Inspectors and Jet Fuel"]


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Eclectic Transportation Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Comparative Transportation and Fuel Inspections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Inspecting the Jet Set: The Curious Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Montana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Congo-Brazzaville with an abstract of In the world of transportation, the connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Montana and jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville has been a subject of mystery and speculation. This research delves into the correlation between these seemingly disparate factors, aiming to shed light on this enigmatic relationship. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our study analyzed the trends from 2003 to 2021. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8873725 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged, indicating a strong association between the two variables. Our findings not only highlight the unexpected connection between transportation oversight in the remote expanses of Montana and aviation fuel consumption in the heart of Africa, but also underscore the interconnectedness of global transportation systems. This study is a testament to the surprising and whimsical nature of academic research, where even the most unusual pairings can unveil meaningful insights.

ChatGPT:

transportation inspectors, Montana, jet fuel consumption, Congo-Brazzaville, correlation analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, transportation oversight, aviation fuel, global transportation systems

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of transportation inspectors in Montana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of transportation inspectors in Montana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of transportation inspectors in Montana

Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Congo-Brazzaville in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville

Correlation r = 0.8873725 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7874299 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of transportation inspectors in Montana) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.07E-7. 0.0000004073886886985960400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 4.07E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,454,658 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of transportation inspectors in Montana (Laborers)50180190190190190290280300280290270180180170130190140120
Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville (Million Barrels/Day)0.8255891.171.629451.49911.868441.562.17261.890162.063972.107421.846712.08571.520821.5070.9993970.9993971.021120.8907670.890767




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([50,180,190,190,190,190,290,280,300,280,290,270,180,180,170,130,190,140,120,])
array_2 = np.array([0.825589,1.17,1.62945,1.4991,1.86844,1.56,2.1726,1.89016,2.06397,2.10742,1.84671,2.0857,1.52082,1.507,0.999397,0.999397,1.02112,0.890767,0.890767,])
array_1_name = "The number of transportation inspectors in Montana"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Congo-Brazzaville"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 1766 · Black Variable ID: 10828 · Red Variable ID: 24311
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0