about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,744 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and the second variable is The number of postmasters in Kansas.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use in Kansas corn decreased, the size of corn cobs also decreased, leading to a nationwide corn shortage. With fewer corn shipments requiring postal services, the demand for postmasters in Kansas plummeted. Who knew that small corn could lead to even smaller postmaster populations?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a vast Kansas cornfield with towering genetically modified corn stalks as far as the eye can see. Among the rows of corn, a small post office stands with a few postmasters busy sorting mail and packages. Capture the contrast between the bustling activity of the post office and the peaceful serenity of the cornfield to symbolize the coexistence of modern agricultural practices and traditional small-town life in Kansas. The scene should highlight the harmonious blending of nature and human activity in the heartland of the United States. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Cybernetic art Magic realism Low poly A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield in Kansas, towering stalks of genetically modified corn stretch as far as the eye can see. Among the rows of corn, a small post office stands with a few postmasters busy sorting mail and packages. The bustling activity of the post office contrasts with the peaceful serenity of the cornfield, symbolizing the coexistence of modern agricultural practices and traditional small-town life in Kansas.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield in Kansas, towering stalks of genetically modified corn stretch as far as the eye can see. Among the rows of corn, a small post office stands with a few postmasters busy sorting mail and packages. The bustling activity of the post office contrasts with the peaceful serenity of the cornfield, symbolizing the coexistence of modern agricultural practices and traditional small-town life in Kansas. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a vast Kansas cornfield with towering genetically modified corn stalks as far as the eye can see. Among the rows of corn, a small post office stands with a few postmasters busy sorting mail and packages. Capture the contrast between the bustling activity of the post office and the peaceful serenity of the cornfield to symbolize the coexistence of modern agricultural practices and traditional small-town life in Kansas. The scene should highlight the harmonious blending of nature and human activity in the heartland of the United States.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Kansas caused The number of postmasters in Kansas to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas

The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the sunflower state of Kansas and the fluctuating number of postmasters in the same region. While the topic of GMOs has been subject to heated debate, we sought to unravel a more amusing aspect – the potential influence of this controversial agricultural practice on the presence of postmasters. Leveraging comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning nearly two decades, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the interplay between biotechnology and rural postal infrastructure but also provide a lighthearted dimension to the discourse on GMOs. This investigation underscores the need for further exploration of unconventional ramifications stemming from agricultural innovations and their unexpected implications on local administrative positions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the sunflower state of Kansas and the fluctuating number of postmasters in the same region. While the topic of GMOs has been subject to heated debate, we sought to unravel a more amusing aspect – the potential influence of this controversial agricultural practice on the presence of postmasters. Leveraging comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning nearly two decades, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the interplay between biotechnology and rural postal infrastructure but also provide a lighthearted dimension to the discourse on GMOs. This investigation underscores the need for further exploration of unconventional ramifications stemming from agricultural innovations and their unexpected implications on local administrative positions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The study of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a kernel of controversy in the agricultural landscape. As the debate over GMO usage in corn cultivation continues to sprout, the relationship between this contentious practice and the proliferation of postmasters in Kansas has cultivated a growing curiosity. In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a good sense of humor, we embarked on this investigation, eager to uncover any corny connections between biotechnology and postal services.

While many have fixated on the potential health and environmental impacts of GMOs, we set our sights on a more whimsical and unusual angle – the potential influence of GMO corn on the presence and persistence of postmasters in Kansas. This, we must admit, presented an ear-resistible opportunity to delve into the unexplored dynamics of rural infrastructure, not to mention the pun-tential for wordplay within scholarly discourse.

With our curiosity piqued and a kernel of inspiration driving our investigation, we harnessed comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, hoping to glean insights from the stalks of statistical analysis. What we unearthed left us surprised, if not a-maize-d, as our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022 – a-maize-ing, indeed!

In the great tradition of academic research, our results not only add a whimsical twist to the ongoing discussion about GMOs but also shine a light on the often-overlooked interplay between agricultural innovation and administrative positions in rural areas. As we delve into the findings of this study, we aim to offer a light-hearted perspective that not only raises eyebrows but also plants the seed for further unexpected explorations into the ramifications of agricultural practices.

So, dear reader, grab a cup of corn juice, put on your thinking hat, and join us as we peck through the cornfield of data to uncover the fascinating correlation between GMO corn and the postmaster proliferation in the heart of the Great Plains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the sunflower state of Kansas and the fluctuating number of postmasters in the same region. While the topic of GMOs has been subject to heated debate, we sought to unravel a more amusing aspect – the potential influence of this controversial agricultural practice on the presence of postmasters. Leveraging comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning nearly two decades, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the interplay between biotechnology and rural postal infrastructure but also provide a lighthearted dimension to the discourse on GMOs. This investigation underscores the need for further exploration of unconventional ramifications stemming from agricultural innovations and their unexpected implications on local administrative positions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a kernel of controversy in the agricultural landscape. As the debate over GMO usage in corn cultivation continues to sprout, the relationship between this contentious practice and the proliferation of postmasters in Kansas has cultivated a growing curiosity. In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a good sense of humor, we embarked on this investigation, eager to uncover any corny connections between biotechnology and postal services.
While many have fixated on the potential health and environmental impacts of GMOs, we set our sights on a more whimsical and unusual angle – the potential influence of GMO corn on the presence and persistence of postmasters in Kansas. This, we must admit, presented an ear-resistible opportunity to delve into the unexplored dynamics of rural infrastructure, not to mention the pun-tential for wordplay within scholarly discourse.
With our curiosity piqued and a kernel of inspiration driving our investigation, we harnessed comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, hoping to glean insights from the stalks of statistical analysis. What we unearthed left us surprised, if not a-maize-d, as our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022 – a-maize-ing, indeed!
In the great tradition of academic research, our results not only add a whimsical twist to the ongoing discussion about GMOs but also shine a light on the often-overlooked interplay between agricultural innovation and administrative positions in rural areas. As we delve into the findings of this study, we aim to offer a light-hearted perspective that not only raises eyebrows but also plants the seed for further unexpected explorations into the ramifications of agricultural practices.
So, dear reader, grab a cup of corn juice, put on your thinking hat, and join us as we peck through the cornfield of data to uncover the fascinating correlation between GMO corn and the postmaster proliferation in the heart of the Great Plains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research has delved deep into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their impact on agriculture and the environment. In "The Effects of GMO Corn on Soil Health," Smith and colleagues examine the influence of GMO corn cultivation on soil microbial communities, while Doe et al. explore the economic implications of GMO corn production in "Economic Analysis of GMO Crop Adoption in the Midwest." These studies provide vital insights into the multifaceted effects of GMOs, setting the stage for our investigation into the less orthodox domain of rural postal infrastructure.

Turning to the postal service in Kansas, Jones discusses the historical development of postal infrastructure in the American Midwest in "Stamping Through the Heartland," shedding light on the often-overlooked role of postmasters in small communities. This contextual understanding provides a backdrop for our exploration of the relationship between GMO corn and the presence of postmasters in the state.

Taking a more imaginative turn, the works of fiction also offer intriguing perspectives on rural life and agricultural practices. In "The Cornfield Conspiracy," a novel by J.K. Growling, the protagonist uncovers a secret GMO experiment within a Kansas cornfield and its unexpected connection to the local postal service. Meanwhile, in "The Postmaster's Predicament" by Agatha Grainy, the protagonist navigates the challenges of maintaining a rural post office amidst the backdrop of shifting agricultural trends. Though fictional, these works stimulate the imagination and prompt us to consider the less obvious implications of GMO usage in real-world contexts.

Furthermore, the popular internet meme "Corny Corn" highlights the humorous side of agricultural practices, emphasizing the comical aspects of corn cultivation and its impact on local communities. This meme not only adds a touch of levity to the discussion but also encourages us to approach our topic with a grain of humor.

As we venture into the unexplored territory of GMO corn and postmaster proliferation, we are reminded of the valuable insights that may be gleaned from unconventional sources and unexpected connections. The literature, both academic and creative, serves as a rich tapestry from which we draw inspiration and a-maize-ing revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the sunflower state of Kansas and the fluctuating number of postmasters in the same region. While the topic of GMOs has been subject to heated debate, we sought to unravel a more amusing aspect – the potential influence of this controversial agricultural practice on the presence of postmasters. Leveraging comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning nearly two decades, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the interplay between biotechnology and rural postal infrastructure but also provide a lighthearted dimension to the discourse on GMOs. This investigation underscores the need for further exploration of unconventional ramifications stemming from agricultural innovations and their unexpected implications on local administrative positions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a kernel of controversy in the agricultural landscape. As the debate over GMO usage in corn cultivation continues to sprout, the relationship between this contentious practice and the proliferation of postmasters in Kansas has cultivated a growing curiosity. In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a good sense of humor, we embarked on this investigation, eager to uncover any corny connections between biotechnology and postal services.
While many have fixated on the potential health and environmental impacts of GMOs, we set our sights on a more whimsical and unusual angle – the potential influence of GMO corn on the presence and persistence of postmasters in Kansas. This, we must admit, presented an ear-resistible opportunity to delve into the unexplored dynamics of rural infrastructure, not to mention the pun-tential for wordplay within scholarly discourse.
With our curiosity piqued and a kernel of inspiration driving our investigation, we harnessed comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, hoping to glean insights from the stalks of statistical analysis. What we unearthed left us surprised, if not a-maize-d, as our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022 – a-maize-ing, indeed!
In the great tradition of academic research, our results not only add a whimsical twist to the ongoing discussion about GMOs but also shine a light on the often-overlooked interplay between agricultural innovation and administrative positions in rural areas. As we delve into the findings of this study, we aim to offer a light-hearted perspective that not only raises eyebrows but also plants the seed for further unexpected explorations into the ramifications of agricultural practices.
So, dear reader, grab a cup of corn juice, put on your thinking hat, and join us as we peck through the cornfield of data to uncover the fascinating correlation between GMO corn and the postmaster proliferation in the heart of the Great Plains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To navigate the complex web of corn-related and postal data, our research team embarked on a maize-ing journey spanning nearly two decades, unearthing insights from the hallowed grounds of the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our unconventional journey commenced with the collection of data pertaining to the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Kansas. We leveraged a robust combination of internet wizardry and unbridled curiosity to corral data from a variety of official sources, affirming that we weren't simply kernels of truth in a vast sea of digital chaff.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics served as our trusty guide in tracking the presence and fluctuations in the number of postmasters within the sunflower state, allowing us to plow through the postal landscape with statistical acumen. Harnessing these disparate datasets required a deft touch and an affinity for combing through rows and columns, akin to separating kernels from the cob.

After gathering this bountiful harvest of data, our team sought to foster understanding through methods that could sieve out insights from the proverbial cornfield. We employed a rigorous time-series analysis, where each year served as a kernel of truth in the grand scheme of our investigation. Utilizing this approach, we sought to discern patterns, correlations, and relationships that could unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn cultivation and the ebb and flow of postmasters across the sunflower state.

Our statistical toolkit encompassed a diverse array of measures, including the calculation of correlation coefficients and the determination of p-values. This facilitated the systematic examination of the relationship between the adoption of GMO corn and the presence of postmasters, bringing a whole new meaning to the term "agri-culture."

As we ventured deeper into this scholarly wilderness, we also made use of advanced graphical methods, designing visual representations that could captivate the academic eye and provide a-maize-ing glimpses into the interplay between GMOs and postal prominence. Scatterplots and time-series graphs emerged as our trusty companions, each point and line whispering secrets of correlation and causation amidst the rustling stalks of data.

While our methods may have been off the cob-path at times, we remained steadfast in our dedication to unraveling the unseen threads of connection between GMO corn and the postal infrastructure of Kansas. Our collective efforts culminated in the unveiling of a robust statistical model capable of capturing the nuanced relationship between these seemingly disparate elements, transforming a seemingly hodge-podge collection of data into a coherent and compelling narrative.

With our unlikely journey through the maize field of scholarly investigation now behind us, we turn our attention to the empirical fruits of our labor, poised to present the intriguing findings that emerged from this whimsical investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9779098, r-squared of 0.9563076, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the sunflower state of Kansas and the fluctuating number of postmasters in the same region. While the topic of GMOs has been subject to heated debate, we sought to unravel a more amusing aspect – the potential influence of this controversial agricultural practice on the presence of postmasters. Leveraging comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning nearly two decades, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the interplay between biotechnology and rural postal infrastructure but also provide a lighthearted dimension to the discourse on GMOs. This investigation underscores the need for further exploration of unconventional ramifications stemming from agricultural innovations and their unexpected implications on local administrative positions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a kernel of controversy in the agricultural landscape. As the debate over GMO usage in corn cultivation continues to sprout, the relationship between this contentious practice and the proliferation of postmasters in Kansas has cultivated a growing curiosity. In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a good sense of humor, we embarked on this investigation, eager to uncover any corny connections between biotechnology and postal services.
While many have fixated on the potential health and environmental impacts of GMOs, we set our sights on a more whimsical and unusual angle – the potential influence of GMO corn on the presence and persistence of postmasters in Kansas. This, we must admit, presented an ear-resistible opportunity to delve into the unexplored dynamics of rural infrastructure, not to mention the pun-tential for wordplay within scholarly discourse.
With our curiosity piqued and a kernel of inspiration driving our investigation, we harnessed comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, hoping to glean insights from the stalks of statistical analysis. What we unearthed left us surprised, if not a-maize-d, as our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022 – a-maize-ing, indeed!
In the great tradition of academic research, our results not only add a whimsical twist to the ongoing discussion about GMOs but also shine a light on the often-overlooked interplay between agricultural innovation and administrative positions in rural areas. As we delve into the findings of this study, we aim to offer a light-hearted perspective that not only raises eyebrows but also plants the seed for further unexpected explorations into the ramifications of agricultural practices.
So, dear reader, grab a cup of corn juice, put on your thinking hat, and join us as we peck through the cornfield of data to uncover the fascinating correlation between GMO corn and the postmaster proliferation in the heart of the Great Plains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Kansas and the number of postmasters in the same region during the period 2003 to 2022 yielded some rather surprising results – results that might just stalk you.

Our investigation uncovered a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9779098. In other words, the association between the two variables was as clear as day – or should we say, as clear as a bright sunny day on a Kansas cornfield. The r-squared value indicated that a whopping 95.63% of the variation in the number of postmasters could be explained by the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. It's safe to say that our findings were not just a-maize-ing but also quite ear-resistible.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated that the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance was as low as finding a needle in a cornfield – highly unlikely, indeed.

Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and the number of postmasters. This relationship was so conspicuous that one could almost see the kernels of truth sprouting from the data points.

These results not only bring amusing insights into the interplay between agricultural practices and rural administrative positions but also highlight the untapped potential of seemingly unrelated variables sprouting connections – a-maize-ing, isn't it?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the sunflower state of Kansas and the fluctuating number of postmasters in the same region. While the topic of GMOs has been subject to heated debate, we sought to unravel a more amusing aspect – the potential influence of this controversial agricultural practice on the presence of postmasters. Leveraging comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning nearly two decades, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the interplay between biotechnology and rural postal infrastructure but also provide a lighthearted dimension to the discourse on GMOs. This investigation underscores the need for further exploration of unconventional ramifications stemming from agricultural innovations and their unexpected implications on local administrative positions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has delved deep into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their impact on agriculture and the environment. In "The Effects of GMO Corn on Soil Health," Smith and colleagues examine the influence of GMO corn cultivation on soil microbial communities, while Doe et al. explore the economic implications of GMO corn production in "Economic Analysis of GMO Crop Adoption in the Midwest." These studies provide vital insights into the multifaceted effects of GMOs, setting the stage for our investigation into the less orthodox domain of rural postal infrastructure.
Turning to the postal service in Kansas, Jones discusses the historical development of postal infrastructure in the American Midwest in "Stamping Through the Heartland," shedding light on the often-overlooked role of postmasters in small communities. This contextual understanding provides a backdrop for our exploration of the relationship between GMO corn and the presence of postmasters in the state.
Taking a more imaginative turn, the works of fiction also offer intriguing perspectives on rural life and agricultural practices. In "The Cornfield Conspiracy," a novel by J.K. Growling, the protagonist uncovers a secret GMO experiment within a Kansas cornfield and its unexpected connection to the local postal service. Meanwhile, in "The Postmaster's Predicament" by Agatha Grainy, the protagonist navigates the challenges of maintaining a rural post office amidst the backdrop of shifting agricultural trends. Though fictional, these works stimulate the imagination and prompt us to consider the less obvious implications of GMO usage in real-world contexts.
Furthermore, the popular internet meme "Corny Corn" highlights the humorous side of agricultural practices, emphasizing the comical aspects of corn cultivation and its impact on local communities. This meme not only adds a touch of levity to the discussion but also encourages us to approach our topic with a grain of humor.
As we venture into the unexplored territory of GMO corn and postmaster proliferation, we are reminded of the valuable insights that may be gleaned from unconventional sources and unexpected connections. The literature, both academic and creative, serves as a rich tapestry from which we draw inspiration and a-maize-ing revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Kansas and the number of postmasters in the same region during the period 2003 to 2022 yielded some rather surprising results – results that might just stalk you.
Our investigation uncovered a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9779098. In other words, the association between the two variables was as clear as day – or should we say, as clear as a bright sunny day on a Kansas cornfield. The r-squared value indicated that a whopping 95.63% of the variation in the number of postmasters could be explained by the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. It's safe to say that our findings were not just a-maize-ing but also quite ear-resistible.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated that the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance was as low as finding a needle in a cornfield – highly unlikely, indeed.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and the number of postmasters. This relationship was so conspicuous that one could almost see the kernels of truth sprouting from the data points.
These results not only bring amusing insights into the interplay between agricultural practices and rural administrative positions but also highlight the untapped potential of seemingly unrelated variables sprouting connections – a-maize-ing, isn't it?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have unveiled a kernel of truth that may leave some scratching their heads in disbelief. The remarkable correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation and the proliferation of postmasters in Kansas from 2003 to 2022 might seem as surreal as a unicorn grazing in a cornfield, but the statistical evidence speaks for itself. Our results not only corroborate the previous investigations that have probed the multifaceted effects of GMOs but also shed light on the whimsically profound interconnectedness of seemingly disparate elements.

The a-maize-ing correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 undoubtedly reaps a harvest of intrigue. Not only does it imply a strong positive relationship between GMO corn production and the number of postmasters, but it also leaves us pondering the possibility of a potentially sprouting phenomenon. These findings, rather than being mere corn-y coincidences, point to the underlying essence of unintended consequences stemming from agricultural innovations.

Now, as we traipse through this amusing empirical landscape, it's worth acknowledging the seemingly unrelated variables that have entwined in our statistical tapestry. Who would have thought that the cultivation of GMO corn could have a reach extending into the realm of rural postal administration? This delightful revelation underscores the importance of peeling back the layers of seemingly unrelated phenomena to uncover the ear-resistible connections that lie beneath.

Moreover, the statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, raises eyebrows and generates a-husk-ment that cannot be brushed aside. The likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by sheer coincidence is as remote as stumbling upon a unicorn sipping on a caramel macchiato in a farmer's market.

In drawing inspiration from unexpected sources such as works of fiction and internet memes, we've learned not to dismiss the whimsical or seemingly ludicrous. The intriguing perspectives offered by unconventional sources have led us to explore the sillier side of the scholarly inquiry and have imparted valuable insights dressed in a cloak of humor.

The implications of our findings present prospects for further exploration into the oddest of agricultural ripple effects. Our investigation, with its light-hearted tone, undergirds the notion that scientific inquiry need not always assume a serious countenance; occasionally, it can also sashay into the realms of whimsy and bemusement. After all, a-maize-ing discoveries often sprout from the unlikeliest of soil.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and The number of postmasters in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the sunflower state of Kansas and the fluctuating number of postmasters in the same region. While the topic of GMOs has been subject to heated debate, we sought to unravel a more amusing aspect – the potential influence of this controversial agricultural practice on the presence of postmasters. Leveraging comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning nearly two decades, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the interplay between biotechnology and rural postal infrastructure but also provide a lighthearted dimension to the discourse on GMOs. This investigation underscores the need for further exploration of unconventional ramifications stemming from agricultural innovations and their unexpected implications on local administrative positions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a kernel of controversy in the agricultural landscape. As the debate over GMO usage in corn cultivation continues to sprout, the relationship between this contentious practice and the proliferation of postmasters in Kansas has cultivated a growing curiosity. In the spirit of scientific inquiry and a good sense of humor, we embarked on this investigation, eager to uncover any corny connections between biotechnology and postal services.
While many have fixated on the potential health and environmental impacts of GMOs, we set our sights on a more whimsical and unusual angle – the potential influence of GMO corn on the presence and persistence of postmasters in Kansas. This, we must admit, presented an ear-resistible opportunity to delve into the unexplored dynamics of rural infrastructure, not to mention the pun-tential for wordplay within scholarly discourse.
With our curiosity piqued and a kernel of inspiration driving our investigation, we harnessed comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics, hoping to glean insights from the stalks of statistical analysis. What we unearthed left us surprised, if not a-maize-d, as our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022 – a-maize-ing, indeed!
In the great tradition of academic research, our results not only add a whimsical twist to the ongoing discussion about GMOs but also shine a light on the often-overlooked interplay between agricultural innovation and administrative positions in rural areas. As we delve into the findings of this study, we aim to offer a light-hearted perspective that not only raises eyebrows but also plants the seed for further unexpected explorations into the ramifications of agricultural practices.
So, dear reader, grab a cup of corn juice, put on your thinking hat, and join us as we peck through the cornfield of data to uncover the fascinating correlation between GMO corn and the postmaster proliferation in the heart of the Great Plains.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Kansas and the number of postmasters in the same region during the period 2003 to 2022 yielded some rather surprising results – results that might just stalk you.
Our investigation uncovered a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9779098. In other words, the association between the two variables was as clear as day – or should we say, as clear as a bright sunny day on a Kansas cornfield. The r-squared value indicated that a whopping 95.63% of the variation in the number of postmasters could be explained by the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. It's safe to say that our findings were not just a-maize-ing but also quite ear-resistible.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated that the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance was as low as finding a needle in a cornfield – highly unlikely, indeed.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and the number of postmasters. This relationship was so conspicuous that one could almost see the kernels of truth sprouting from the data points.
These results not only bring amusing insights into the interplay between agricultural practices and rural administrative positions but also highlight the untapped potential of seemingly unrelated variables sprouting connections – a-maize-ing, isn't it?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study illuminates the surprisingly robust correlation between the utilization of GMOs in corn cultivation in Kansas and the presence of postmasters, uncovering a kernel of insight that may have been overlooked in the fields of agricultural and postal research. These findings not only add a new dimension to the ongoing discourse surrounding biotechnology but also cultivate a deeper understanding of the quirky interplay between agricultural innovations and local administrative infrastructure. As we leaf through the data, it's clear that the relationship found is not just corny but also quite cob-founding, leading us to ponder the ear-resistible complexity of rural dynamics.

We must acknowledge the limitations of our study, including the absence of a causal relationship and the potential influence of confounding variables. However, the strength of the correlation and the statistical significance point to a connection worth further examination – a stalk-worthy curiosity, one might say.

While our investigation may have sown unexpected seeds of inquiry, we firmly assert that no further research is needed in this area. The a-maize-ing correlation we have revealed speaks for itself, and it's time to let this corny tale rest in the fertile soil of scholarly novelty. As we bid adieu to this peculiar yet fascinating exploration, we hope it leaves our readers with a kernel of amusement and a fresh appreciation for the whimsical side of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Corny Connection: The Correlation Between GMO Corn and Postmaster Proliferation in Kansas with an abstract of This study explores the intriguing link between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the sunflower state of Kansas and the fluctuating number of postmasters in the same region. While the topic of GMOs has been subject to heated debate, we sought to unravel a more amusing aspect – the potential influence of this controversial agricultural practice on the presence of postmasters. Leveraging comprehensive data from the USDA and Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning nearly two decades, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9779098 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the interplay between biotechnology and rural postal infrastructure but also provide a lighthearted dimension to the discourse on GMOs. This investigation underscores the need for further exploration of unconventional ramifications stemming from agricultural innovations and their unexpected implications on local administrative positions.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, genetically modified organisms, corn cultivation, Kansas, postmasters, postal infrastructure, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, biotechnology, rural effects, agricultural innovations, administrative positions, unconventional ramifications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Kansas
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Kansas that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Kansas

The number of postmasters in Kansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of postmasters and mail superintendents in Kansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of postmasters in Kansas

Correlation r = 0.9779098 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9563076 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of postmasters in Kansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Kansas) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-13. 0.0000000000001098111506189287
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.1E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 9,106,543,318,813 random variables You don't actually need 9 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Kansas (GMO corn %)252523232525242228207544321414
The number of postmasters in Kansas (Laborers)580570570580570580550540540520340340220220200200200200170190




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([25,25,23,23,25,25,24,22,28,20,7,5,4,4,3,2,1,4,1,4,])
array_2 = np.array([580,570,570,580,570,580,550,540,540,520,340,340,220,220,200,200,200,200,170,190,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Kansas"
array_2_name = "The number of postmasters in Kansas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 1744 · Black Variable ID: 713 · Red Variable ID: 8120
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0